A systematic review of the drug-induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis in Indian population.

BACKGROUND: Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are rare severe cutaneous drug reactions. No large scale epidemiological data are available for this disorder in India. AIMS: To carry out a systematic review of the published evidence of the drug-induced SJS and TEN in Indian population. METHODS: Publications from 1995 to 2011 describing SJS and TEN in Indian population were searched in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and UK PUBMED Central electronic databases. Data were collected for the causative drugs and other clinical characteristics of SJS and TEN from the selected studies. RESULTS: From 225 references, 10 references were included as per selection criteria. The major causative drugs were antimicrobials (37.27%), anti-epileptics (35.73%) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (15.93%). Carbamazepine (18.25%), phenytoin (13.37%), fluoroquinolones (8.48%) and paracetamol (6.17%) were most commonly implicated drugs. Regional differences were observed for fluoroquinolones, sulfa drugs and carbamazepine. Total 62.96% of patients showed systemic complications. Most common complications were ocular (40.29%) and septicemia (17.65%). Higher mortality was observed for TEN as compared to SJS (odd ratio-7.19; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.62-31.92; p = 0.0023). Observed mortality is higher than expected as per SCORTEN score 3. Duration of hospital stay was significantly higher in TEN (20.6 days; 95% CI 14.4-26.8) as compared to SJS (9.7 days; 95% CI 5.8-13.6; p = 0.020). Cost of management was significantly higher in TEN (Rs. 7910; 95% CI 5672-10147; p < 0.0001) as compared to SJS (Rs 2460; 95% CI 1762-3158). No statistical data were described for steroid use in the studies included. CONCLUSION: Carbamazepine, phenytoin, fluoroquinolones and paracetamol were the major causative drugs. TEN is showing higher mortality, morbidity and economic burden than SJS.

An epidemiological and clinical analysis of cutaneous adverse drug reactions seen in a tertiary hospital in Johor, Malaysia.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence, clinical patterns, and causative drugs of cutaneous adverse drug reactions (cADR) vary among the different populations previously studied. AIM: To determine the prevalence, the clinical patterns of drug eruptions, and the common drugs implicated, particularly in severe cADR such as Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/Toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) and drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) in our population. METHODS: We analyzed the database established for all cADR seen by the department of Dermatology from January 2001 till December 2010. RESULTS: A total of 362 cADR were seen among 42 170 new clinic attendees, yielding an incidence rate of 0.86%. The most common reaction pattern seen was maculopapular eruption (153 cases) followed by SJS/TEN (110 cases) and DRESS (34 cases). Antibiotics was the most commonly implicated drug group (146 cases) followed by anticonvulsants (81 cases) and antigout drugs (50 cases). The most frequently implicated drug was allopurinol (50 cases). Carbamazepine, allopurinol, and cotrimoxazole were the three main causative drugs of SJS/TEN accounting for 21.8%, 20.9%, and 12.7%, respectively, of the 110 cases seen, whereas DRESS was mainly caused by allopurinol (15 cases). Mortality rates for TEN, SJS, and DRESS were 28.6%, 2.2%, and 5.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The low rate of cADR with a high proportion of severe reactions observed in this study was probably due to referral bias. Otherwise, the reaction patterns and drugs causing cADR in our population were similar to those seen in other countries. Carbamazepine, allopurinol, and cotrimoxazole were the three main causative drugs of SJS/TEN in our population.

Oral drug provocation test to generate a list of safe drugs: experience with 100 patients.

BACKGROUND: Following a drug eruption, patients and their doctors need to know which drugs can be safely administered for subsequent illnesses. Currently available laboratory tests are unable to answer this question in a clinically meaningful manner. AIMS: To describe our use of oral provocation tests to provide a list of safe drugs to patients. METHODS: We studied the records of 100 patients who underwent oral provocation testing in our department between 2003 and 2009. All patients were admitted to hospital and drugs were administered under supervision, one drug per day. A dermatologist evaluated all symptoms and signs that developed following drug intake. RESULTS: Sixty nine women and 31 men underwent provocation testing. There were 96 reactions in 61 patients, of which 44 reactions in 34 patients were judged to be true reactions. All reactions could be controlled, with treatment or spontaneously. A list of safe drugs was provided to the patient along with written instructions to avoid any drug(s) that had produced a reaction. CONCLUSIONS: Oral provocation tests are safe and effective in providing patients with a list of drugs they can take safely. These tests should preferably be undertaken after admitting the patient to hospital.

Stevens Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis and SJS-TEN overlap: a retrospective study of causative drugs and clinical outcome.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Stevens Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) and SJS-TEN overlap are serious adverse cutaneous drug reactions. Drugs are often implicated in these reactions. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of inpatients' data with these dermatological diagnoses were carried out for three years, to study the causative drugs, clinical outcome, and mortality in these conditions. RESULTS: Thirty patients (15 TEN, nine SJS-TEN overlap, and six SJS) were admitted. In 21 cases, multiple drugs were implicated whereas single drugs were responsible in nine. Anticonvulsants (35.08%) were the most commonly implicated drugs followed by antibiotics (33.33%) and NSAIDS (24.56%). Twenty-five patients recovered whereas five died (four TEN, one SJS-TEN overlap). CONCLUSION: Anticonvulsants, antibiotics and NSAIDs were the most frequently implicated drugs. TEN causes higher mortality than both SJS and SJS-TEN overlap.

Carbamazepine--the commonest cause of toxic epidermal necrolysis and Stevens-Johnson syndrome: a study of 7 years.

BACKGROUND: Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) and Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) are a group of severe life threatening drug reactions. The drugs commonly implicated as the cause of these drug reactions vary depending on host factors and the prescription pattern of drugs in that particular area. AIM: The aim of the study was to find the drugs implicated as the cause of SJS/TEN in the patients admitted in the dermatology ward at the Medical College, Thrissur and to find the clinical outcome. METHODS: It was a retrospective study of 7 years from 1997 to 2004. The case records of all patients with a clinical diagnosis of TEN or SJS were studied in detail regarding the drugs implicated as the cause, the management and the clinical outcome. RESULTS: During the study period, 41 patients in the age group ranging from 12 to 72 years were treated as inpatients, of which 20 were males and 21 were females. The commonest drug implicated as the cause of SJS/TEN was carbamazepine (44%). The indication for carbamazepine was control of pain in more than 50% of the cases. Presence of a major systemic disease before the onset of SJS/TEN was associated with a bad prognosis. CONCLUSION: The increased use of carbamazepine, especially for control of pain, may be the reason for the increased incidence of SJS/TEN due to the same drug. Awareness about the drugs implicated in life threatening drug reactions will help physicians in preventing them by judicious use of the drugs.

Adverse cutaneous reactions to thiacetazone for tuberculosis treatment in Tanzania.

Because thiacetazone has been linked with serious adverse cutaneous reactions, we undertook 1 year of systematic surveillance for cutaneous thiacetazone-associated adverse reactions within the national tuberculosis programme of Tanzania. For individual cases, we collected information on age, sex, interval between commencing thiacetazone-containing treatment and occurrence of adverse reaction, most severe clinical presentation (toxic epidermal necrolysis, rash without necrolysis, itching without rash), and outcome (dead or alive) within 2 weeks of onset. Univariate and multivariate analyses were done of variables relevant to outcome. 1273 patients with adverse reactions were reported. The frequency of fatal outcome from any cutaneous reaction was 3.1 per 1000 among all tuberculosis patients, and 19.1% among patients with toxic epidermal necrolysis. About 60% of all adverse reactions and deaths occurred within 20 days of starting thiacetazone. Case fatality from adverse cutaneous reactions was considerably less frequent than reported previously, suggesting that improved management might allow retention of thiacetazone in the armamentarium of national tuberculosis programmes even where infection with HIV is prevalent.

PIP: Thiacetazone is a useful and inexpensive companion drug in the treatment of tuberculosis (TB). Its main contribution is its ability to prevent failure and relapse in patients with initially isoniazid-resistant strains. Early toxicity studies showed that the drug was generally better tolerated in East Africa than in many other countries. Thiacetazone is an essential drug in the Tanzania National Tuberculosis/Leprosy Program. Under trial conditions in Tanzania, before the HIV epidemic, adverse reactions associated with thiacetazone were uncommon. Serious, and occasionally fatal, toxic cutaneous reactions to sulphur-containing drugs in HIV-infected patients have been recognized for several years. Recently, the use of thiacetazone in HIV-infected patients has been linked with serious adverse cutaneous reactions, including toxic epidermal necrolysis. Most reports, however, concerned only patients admitted to referral hospitals, so the Tanzania National Tuberculosis Program began a nationwide one-year systematic surveillance study to determine the frequency and severity of adverse cutaneous reactions. Individual-level data were collected on each case's age, sex, interval between commencing thiacetazone-containing treatment and occurrence of adverse reaction, most severe clinical presentation, and outcome within two weeks of onset. The study identified 1273 patients with adverse reactions. The frequency of fatal outcome from any cutaneous reaction was 3.1 per 1000 among all tuberculosis patients and 19.1% among patients with toxic epidermal necrolysis. Approximately 60% of all adverse reactions and deaths occurred within twenty days of starting thiacetazone. Case fatality from adverse cutaneous reactions was considerably less frequent than previously reported, suggesting that improved management may allow the retention of thiacetazone as a weapon against TB even where infection with HIV is prevalent.