Novel PCR primers for improved detection of Mycobacterium leprae and diagnosis of leprosy.

AIMS: Diagnosis of leprosy, a chronic infection caused by Mycobacterium leprae, predominantly depends on clinical manifestations and histopathological analysis, hampering rapid and accurate diagnostics. Our aim was to increase accuracy of leprosy diagnosis by improving M. leprae's DNA detection based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique using new specific primers for the RLEP repetitive sequence. METHODS AND RESULTS: The specific target region, RLEP, of M. leprae's genome was selected based on comparative genomics. After confirming the specificity of this region, using blastn analysis, primers were designed and tested for their in silico specificity. To evaluate the specificity and sensitivity of these primers in vitro, 184 blood samples from patients were used in qPCR. The new primer pair LYON1/LYON2 produced 91% positive samples, whereas the current primer pair LP1/LP2 produced 46%. Specificity and DNA detection limit test were carried out to compare the efficiency of the developed primer pair. The LYON1/LYON2 primer showed 100% specificity, whereas LP1/LP2 showed 64%. The DNA detection limit of LYON1/LYON2 was 10 copies of bacterial genomes per millilitre, whereas LP1/LP2 was 1000 copies of bacterial genomes per millilitre. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the developed LYON1/LYON2 primer pair presented to be a specific and sensitive new molecular marker for the diagnosis of leprosy. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The development of a specific primer pair for the detection of the M. leprae genome through qPCR technique contributes to a fast, sensitive and specific diagnosis, which is essential to prevent spreading and progression of this disease.

Development and evaluation of a droplet digital PCR assay for the diagnosis of paucibacillary leprosy in skin biopsy specimens.

BACKGROUND: The reduced amounts of Mycobacterium leprae (M. leprae) among paucibacillary (PB) patients reflect the need to further optimize methods for leprosy diagnosis. An increasing number of reports have shown that droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) is a promising tool for diagnosis of infectious disease among samples with low copy number. To date, no publications have investigated the utility of ddPCR in the detection of M. leprae. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a ddPCR assay for the diagnosis of PB leprosy. METHODOLOGY: The two most sensitive DNA targets for detection of M. leprae were selected from electronic databases for assessment of sensitivity and specificity by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and ddPCR. Control patients (n = 59) suffering from other dermatological diseases were used to define the cut-off of the duplex ddPCR assay. For comparative evaluation, qPCR and ddPCR assays were performed in 44 PB patients and 68 multibacillary (MB) patients. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: M. leprae-specific repetitive element (RLEP) and groEL (encoding the 65 kDa molecular chaperone GroEL) were used to develop the ddPCR assay by systematically analyzing specificity and sensitivity. Based on the defined cut-off value, the ddPCR assay showed greater sensitivity in detecting M. leprae DNA in PB patients compared with qPCR (79.5% vs 36.4%), while both assays have a 100% sensitivity in MB patients. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We developed and evaluated a duplex ddPCR assay for leprosy diagnosis in skin biopsy samples from leprosy patients. While still costly, ddPCR might be a promising diagnostic tool for detection of PB leprosy.

Early detection of M. leprae by qPCR in untreated patients and their contacts: results for nasal swab and palate mucosa scraping.

To verify if the hard palate mucosa can be a site of relevance in the early molecular detection of Mycobacterium leprae in leprosy cases and their household contacts and if there is a correlation of results in nasal swab with those of the scraping of the palate mucosa. The quantitative polymerase chain reaction technique was used. Sample included 78 patients with untreated leprosy (G1), their 54 household contacts (G2), and 80 healthy individuals for the negative control (G3). The presence of M. leprae in both G1 and G2 was observed with the nasal swab and the palate mucosa scrapings methods, and it was shown that the sensitivity between the qPCR exams for RLEP and 85B genes is equivalent, with no statistically significant differences (G1 positivity of 35% in the hard palate mucosa and 44% for the nasal one, p = 0.3731 and for G2 of 31 and 38%, respectively, p = 0.6774). Results support the fact that the buccal mucosa and nasal mucosa may be important sites of primary infection of leprosy with repercussion in the transmission chain and that asymptomatic household contacts are heavily harbored by the causative agent of leprosy, which has a critical significance in the prevention and control action of this disease, since the evaluation of these sites arises as of importance in the early detection of M. leprae. Close monitoring and chemoprophylaxis of household contacts appear to be critical to attain interruption of the transmission of leprosy in endemic countries.

Application of RLEP real-time PCR for detection of M. leprae DNA in paraffin-embedded skin biopsy specimens for diagnosis of paucibacillary leprosy.

The TaqMan real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay was evaluated systematically with respect to the standard curve, linear range, and used for detecting Mycobacterium leprae DNA in paraffin-embedded skin biopsy specimens from 60 confirmed leprosy patients and three healthy individuals and 29 other dermatoses and bacterial DNA from 21 different species. The test was further evaluated with 51 paucibacillary (PB) patients. The results showed that the test had good sensitivity (8 fg) and good specificity with no cross-reactivity with 21 other bacterial species and the control specimens, except one with Xanthomatosis. The real-time PCR detection rate for the 51 PB specimens was 74.5% (38 of 51). We conclude that the real-time PCR test is a useful adjunct test for diagnosing early stage or PB leprosy cases.

Visualization of pseudogenes in intracellular bacteria reveals the different tracks to gene destruction.

BACKGROUND: Pseudogenes reveal ancestral gene functions. Some obligate intracellular bacteria, such as Mycobacterium leprae and Rickettsia spp., carry substantial fractions of pseudogenes. Until recently, horizontal gene transfers were considered to be rare events in obligate host-associated bacteria. RESULTS: We present a visualization tool that displays the relationships and positions of degraded and partially overlapping gene sequences in multiple genomes. With this tool we explore the origin and deterioration patterns of the Rickettsia pseudogenes and find that variably present genes and pseudogenes tend to have been acquired more recently, are more divergent in sequence, and exhibit a different functional profile compared with genes conserved across all species. Overall, the origin of only one-quarter of the variable genes and pseudogenes can be traced back to the common ancestor of Rickettsia and the outgroup genera Orientia and Wolbachia. These sequences contain only a few disruptive mutations and show a broad functional distribution profile, much like the core genes. The remaining genes and pseudogenes are extensively degraded or solely present in a single species. Their functional profile was heavily biased toward the mobile gene pool and genes for components of the cell wall and the lipopolysaccharide. CONCLUSION: Reductive evolution of the vertically inherited genomic core accounts for 25% of the predicted genes in the variable segments of the Rickettsia genomes, whereas 75% stems from the flux of the mobile gene pool along with genes for cell surface structures. Thus, most of the variably present genes and pseudogenes in Rickettsia have arisen from recent acquisitions.

On the origin of leprosy.

Leprosy, a chronic human disease with potentially debilitating neurological consequences, results from infection with Mycobacterium leprae. This unculturable pathogen has undergone extensive reductive evolution, with half of its genome now occupied by pseudogenes. Using comparative genomics, we demonstrated that all extant cases of leprosy are attributable to a single clone whose dissemination worldwide can be retraced from analysis of very rare single-nucleotide polymorphisms. The disease seems to have originated in Eastern Africa or the Near East and spread with successive human migrations. Europeans or North Africans introduced leprosy into West Africa and the Americas within the past 500 years.