Robotics in invasive cardiac electrophysiology.

Robotic systems allow for mapping and ablation of different arrhythmia substrates replacing hand maneuvering of intracardiac catheters with machine steering. Currently there are four commercially available robotic systems. Niobe magnetic navigation system (Stereotaxis Inc., St Louis, MO) and Sensei robotic navigation system (Hansen Medical Inc., Mountain View, CA) have an established platform with at least 10 years of clinical studies looking at their efficacy and safety. AMIGO Remote Catheter System (Catheter Robotics, Inc., Mount Olive, NJ) and Catheter Guidance Control and Imaging (Magnetecs, Inglewood, CA) are in the earlier phases of implementations with ongoing feasibility and some limited clinical studies. This review discusses the advantages and limitations related to each existing system and highlights the ideal futuristic robotic system that may include the most promising features of the current ones.

Initial experience with robotic navigation for catheter ablation of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Remote robotic navigation (RRN) technology has been developed to facilitate catheter ablation of symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). Here, we assess procedural parameters of AF ablation obtained during initial use of RRN compared with a control group treated with a manual ablation approach. METHODS: Consecutive patients with symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent AF were subjected to radiofrequency catheter ablation with RRN (Sensei X [Hansen Medical, Mountain View, CA]; n = 25; mean age, 60 ± 2.3 years) or using the standard manual technique (n = 61; mean age, 62 ± 1.4 years). A circumferential pulmonary vein isolation approach guided by 3-dimensional electroanatomical mapping was followed. RESULTS: Remote robotic navigation was associated with reduction of overall fluoroscopy time by 26%. In a case-control subgroup analysis comparing 25 patients with similar clinical characteristics from each group, mean fluoroscopy time was reduced by 22%. Acute isolation of pulmonary veins was achieved in 97% (RRN) and 96% (conventional ablation), respectively. Ablation times and frequency of adverse events were not significantly different among study groups. CONCLUSIONS: The early use of RRN resulted in a significant reduction of overall fluoroscopy time and was equally effective and safe compared with manual catheter ablation.