Leprosy surveillance study in a highly endemic Brazilian area using leprosy specific serologic tests and IFNγ whole blood assay.

This surveillance study evaluated leprosy-serologic tests and the IFNγ whole-blood-assay/WBA as adjunct diagnostic tools. Previously diagnosed leprosy index cases, intradomiciliary, peridomiciliary contacts from a Brazilian endemic area were enrolled during domiciliary visits. Physical evaluation was performed by trained nurses and leprosy diagnosis confirmed by expert dermatologist. ELISA detected IgM anti-PGL-I, IgG anti-LID-1, and IgM/IgG anti-ND-O-LID antibodies. Heparinized WBA plasma stimulated with LID-1, 46f + LID-1, ML0276 + LID-1 (24 h, 37 °C, 5% CO2) was tested for human IFNγ (QuantiFERON®-TB Gold/QFT-G; Qiagen). The survey included 1731 participants: 44 leprosy index cases, 64 intradomiciliary, 1623 peridomiciliary contacts. Women represented 57.7%, median age was 32 years, 72.2% had BCG scar. Leprosy prevalence was higher in intradomiciliary (8.57%) versus peridomiciliary contacts (0.67%), p < 0.001. Among 23 suspects, five leprosy cases were confirmed: 4 multibacillary/MB and 1 paucibacillary/PB. Leprosy incidence was 0.30%: 1.56% in intradomiciliary versus 0.25% in peridomiciliary (p = 0.028). Seropositivity rates were 1.9% to PGL-I, 4.9% to LID-1, and 1.0% to ND-O-LID. LID-1 positivity was higher in all groups; incident cases were LID-1 seropositive. ND-O-LID positivity was higher in intra- versus peridomiciliary contacts (p = 0.022). IFNγ WBA (40 index cases, 19 suspects, 35 intradomiciliary, 74 peridomiciliary contacts) showed higher LID-1/WBA positivity in peridomiciliary contacts (p > 0.05); significant differences among groups were seen with 46f + LID-1 but 0276 + LID-1 induced higher IFNγ levels. Incident cases were LID-1 seropositive, while IFNγ-WBA had marginal diagnostic application. As seropositivity indicates exposed individuals at higher risk of disease development, the utility of serologic screening for surveillance and prophylactic measures remains to be demonstrated.

Evaluation of antigen-specific immune responses for leprosy diagnosis in a hyperendemic area in China.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate antigen-specific immune responses for leprosy diagnosis in a hyperendemic area in China. METHODS: Eighty-three leprosy patients and 161 non-leprosy controls were enrolled from Hani-yi Autonomous Prefecture of Honghe, Yunnan Province, China. Leprosy patients were divided into multibacillary (MB, n = 38), paucibacillary (PB, n = 23), and post-multi-drug therapy (MDT, n = 22) groups. Controls were divided into the following groups: healthy household contacts (HHC, n = 119), tuberculosis (TB, n = 11), and endemic controls (EC, n = 31). The NDO-LID Rapid Test, M. leprae antigen-specific ELISA and antigen-specific IFN-γ secretion in a whole blood assay (WBA) were used to evaluate these subjects. RESULTS: The NDO-LID Rapid Test achieved higher positive response rates in MB than in PB patients[94.7%(36/38) vs 65.2%(15/23)], and these rates were higher than those observed by ELISA using anti-LID-1[92.1%(35/38) vs 52.2%(12/23)], anti-NDO-LID[92.1%(35/38) vs 47.8% (11/23)], and anti-ND-O-BSA[89.5%(34/38) vs 60.9%(14/23)]. However, the NDO-LID Rapid Test also showed a higher positive response rate in the EC group (33.3%,10/31), which was higher than the rates observed for anti-NDO-LID (12.9%,4/31) and anti-ND-O-BSA (16.1%,5/31). M. leprae antigen-specific ELISA demonstrated relatively high specificity (86.84-97.37%) but low sensitivity (15.97-72.73%) in discriminating between leprosy patients and non-leprosy controls by ROC curve analysis. In contrast, M. leprae antigen-specific IFN-γ secretion detection achieved higher positive response rates in PB than in MB patients (positive ratio of MB vs PB: 40% vs 56% for LID-1, 28.6% vs 47.8% for ML89, 31.4% vs 60.7% for ML2044, and 31.4 vs 47.8% for ML2028) and could distinguish MB from EC when stimulated with ML89(AUC = 0.6664) and PB fromTB when stimulated with ML2044 and ML2028(AUC = 0.7549 and 0.7372, respectively). CONCLUSION: The NDO-LID Rapid Test and M. leprae antigen-specific ELISA are useful tools to assist in the diagnosis of leprosy patients, especially MB patients, although the former had higher sensitivity but lower specificity than the latter. M. leprae antigen-specific IFN-γ release assessed by WBA has diagnostic value for distinguishing PB from TB but not for distinguishing PB from HHC or EC. Screening novel M. leprae-specific antigens, combining different M. leprae antigens and a multi-cytokine analyte model may be needed for more effective diagnosis of leprosy.

Development of an improved ESAT-6 and CFP-10 peptide-based cytokine flow cytometric assay for bovine tuberculosis.

Control of bovine tuberculosis (bTB) continues to be a problem world-wide because of difficulties in identifying infected animals at all stages of infection. The use of the IFN-γ release assays (IGRA) as an ancillary test with the tuberculin skin tests has improved the ability to identify infected animals. However, infected animals may still be missed. The objective of the present study was to evaluate a rapid flow-cytometric assay based on intracellular cytokine staining as an alternative to the in vitro IFN-γ release assay (IGRA). Antigen-specific cells producing IFN-γ were identified after a 6h stimulation with PPD-B, PPD-A and ESAT-6/CFP-10. Defined groups of animals naturally infected with Mycobacterium bovis (Mbv), animals infected with non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), and uninfected control animals were analysed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the optimized assay. Both antemortem and postmortem diagnostic tests were carried out to verify the status of infection. We show that IFN-γ is induced in T cells from whole blood samples from cattle infected with Mbv 6h post stimulation with PPD-B, PPD-A and ESAT-6/CFP-10, whereas non-infected animals did not respond. Four colour flow cytometric analysis demonstrated responding cells were CD45R0(+)CD69(+)CD4(+) memory T cells. Also, the response to stimulation with ESAT-6/CFP-10 can be used to distinguish between cattle infected with Mbv and cattle exposed to NTM. Although further studies are needed, the results indicate that detection of intracellular IFN-γ may represent an important alternative approach for improved method of detection of cattle secreting IFN-γ below levels of detection in culture medium.

Quantiferon-Gold Tuberculosis Test Cannot Detect Latent Tuberculosis in Patients With Leprosy.

Five of 10 paucibacillary leprosy patients were Quantiferon Gold (Q-G) positive with negative chest X-rays. Forty multibacillary leprosy patients were negative. Reports have shown 100% cross-reactivity of ESAT6 and CFP10 between Mycobacterium leprae and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The Q-G test cannot detect latent tuberculosis in patients with leprosy.

Synergistic antigen combinations for the development of interferon gamma release assays for paucibacillary leprosy.

The development of immunodiagnostic tests for paucibacillary leprosy (PB) is based on Mycobacterium leprae specific-cell mediated immunity (CMI)/IFN-γ production. Recently, novel M. leprae protein antigens that stimulate CMI have been described. This study evaluated different M. leprae antigen combinations in whole blood assay (WBA). Five study groups were tested (20 per group): newly diagnosed, untreated PB patients and multibacillary leprosy patients (MB); household contacts of MB patients (HHC); healthy endemic controls (EC); pulmonary tuberculosis patients (TB). WBA (heparinized, 24 h 37 °C 5% CO2) were stimulated with: 10 µg/ml of each individual M. leprae recombinant protein (rML) and five combinations of rML (46f + LID-1, ML0276 + LID-1, ML2055 + ML1632 + ML2044, ML0276 + 46f, ML2055 + LID-1)-M. leprae cell sonicate (MLCS, 10 µg/ml), PHA (1 µg/ml), and PBS alone. Human IFN-γ ELISA (QuantiFERON-TB Gold/QFT-G, Cellestis) was performed using stimulated plasma (arbitrary cut-off = 50 pg/ml). Three out of five antigen combinations (46f + LID-1, ML0276 + LID-1, ML2055 + ML1632 + ML2044) were able to increase the levels of IFN-γ production in WBA in a larger number of responders among both PB leprosy and contacts. However, the magnitude of IFN-γ responses was higher among contacts. The antigen combination (46f + ML0276) stimulated IFN-γ only in symptomatic PB leprosy patients and not in asymptomatic contacts. Few controls (EC, TB) responded to combinations (0-15%), indicating the specificity of the response in an endemic area with high BCG coverage. The synergistic effect of new combinations of M. leprae proteins upon IFN-γ production in WBA indicates their potential use for the development of an interferon gamma release assay/IGRA for the diagnosis of PB leprosy.

Quantiferon-TB Gold in tube assay for the screening of tuberculosis before and during treatment with tumor necrosis factor alpha antagonists.

INTRODUCTION: The usefulness of interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) release assays for tuberculosis screening before tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) antagonists and for monitoring during treatment is a contraversial issue. The aims of this study were to determine whether TNF-α antagonists affect the results of the Quantiferon-TB Gold in-tube assay (QTF); to assess how QTF performs in comparison with the tuberculin skin test (TST) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who are about to start treatment with TNF-α antagonists, RA patients who are not candidates for treatment with TNF-α antagonists, rheumatology patients with confirmed current or past tuberculosis infection, and healthy controls, and to determine the specificity of the QTF test to differentiate leprosy patients, another group of patients infected with mycobacteria. METHODS: The 38 RA patients who were prescribed TNF-α antagonists, 40 RA patients who were not considered for TNF-α antagonist use, 30 rheumatology patients with a history or new diagnosis of tuberculosis, 23 leprosy patients, and 41 healthy controls were studied. QTF and TST were done on the same day, and both were repeated after a mean of 3.6 ± 0.2 months in patients who used TNF-α antagonists. RESULTS: Treatment with TNF-α antagonists did not cause a significant change in the QTF or TST positivity rate (34% versus 42%; P = 0.64; and 24% versus 37%; P = 0.22). Patients with leprosy had a trend for a higher mean IFN-γ level (7.3 ± 8.0) and QTF positivity (61%) than did the other groups; however, the difference was not significant (P = 0.09 and P = 0.43). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with TNF-α antagonists does not seem to affect the QTF test to an appreciable degree. The higher IFN-γ levels in leprosy patients deserves further attention.

Pathogen-specific epitopes as epidemiological tools for defining the magnitude of Mycobacterium leprae transmission in areas endemic for leprosy.

During recent years, comparative genomic analysis has allowed the identification of Mycobacterium leprae-specific genes with potential application for the diagnosis of leprosy. In a previous study, 58 synthetic peptides derived from these sequences were tested for their ability to induce production of IFN-γ in PBMC from endemic controls (EC) with unknown exposure to M. leprae, household contacts of leprosy patients and patients, indicating the potential of these synthetic peptides for the diagnosis of sub- or preclinical forms of leprosy. In the present study, the patterns of IFN-γ release of the individuals exposed or non-exposed to M. leprae were compared using an Artificial Neural Network algorithm, and the most promising M. leprae peptides for the identification of exposed people were selected. This subset of M. leprae-specific peptides allowed the differentiation of groups of individuals from sites hyperendemic for leprosy versus those from areas with lower level detection rates. A progressive reduction in the IFN-γ levels in response to the peptides was seen when contacts of multibacillary (MB) patients were compared to other less exposed groups, suggesting a down modulation of IFN-γ production with an increase in bacillary load or exposure to M. leprae. The data generated indicate that an IFN-γ assay based on these peptides applied individually or as a pool can be used as a new tool for predicting the magnitude of M. leprae transmission in a given population.