ABSTRACT
For patients with localized pancreatic cancer with minimal vascular involvement, optimal survivability requires a multidisciplinary approach of surgical resection and systemic chemotherapy. FOLFIRINOX is a combination chemotherapy regimen that offers promising results in the perioperative and metastatic settings; however, it can cause significant adverse effects. Such toxicity can negatively impact some patients, resulting in chemotherapy discontinuation or surgical unsuitability. In an effort to reduce toxicities and optimize outcomes, this investigation explores the safety and feasibility of substituting liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) for nonliposomal irinotecan to improve tumor drug delivery and potentially reduce toxicity. This regimen, NALIRIFOX, has the potential to be both safer and more effective when administered in the preoperative setting.
For patients with pancreatic cancer with little to no cancer near the blood vessels, the best life expectancy usually requires surgery and chemotherapy. FOLFIRINOX is a chemotherapy medicine that offers promising results for both patients getting surgery and for patients with widespread disease. However, it can cause harmful side effects. The side effects can be so bad that the chemotherapy has to be stopped or that surgery is no longer possible. In order to reduce the harmful side effects and improve outcomes, this investigation looks into the safety and practicality of using a different version of one of the medicines. The different version hopes to improve drug delivery and reduce harmful side effects. This regimen, NALIRIFOX, can be safer and more effective in patients awaiting surgery. Clinical Trial Registration: UF-STO-PANC-004 (NCT03483038) (ClinicalTrials.gov).
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Radiation-Sensitizing Agents , Humans , Irinotecan/therapeutic use , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Oxaliplatin/therapeutic use , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Fluorouracil/adverse effects , Leucovorin/adverse effects , Radiation-Sensitizing Agents/therapeutic use , Clinical Trials, Phase II as TopicABSTRACT
Soft tissue sarcoma is a rare malignancy, with approximately 11,000 cases per year encountered in the United States. It is primarily encountered in adults but can affect patients of any age. There are many histologic subtypes and the malignancy can be low or high grade. Appropriate staging work up includes a physical exam, advanced imaging, and a carefully planned biopsy. This information is then used to guide the discussion of definitive treatment of the tumor which typically involves surgical resection with a negative margin in addition to neoadjuvant or adjuvant external beam radiation. Advances in imaging and radiation therapy have made limb salvage surgery the standard of care, with local control rates greater than 90% in most modern series. Currently, the role of chemotherapy is not well defined and this treatment is typically reserved for patients with metastatic or recurrent disease and for certain histologic subtypes. The goal of this paper is to review the current state of the art in multidisciplinary management of soft tissue sarcoma.
Subject(s)
Combined Modality Therapy , Sarcoma/therapy , HumansABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Marginal excision of soft tissue sarcoma (STS), defined as resection through the tumor pseudocapsule or surrounding reactive tissue, increases the likelihood of local recurrence and necessitates re-excision or postoperative radiation. However, its impact after preoperative radiation therapy (RT) remains unclear. This study therefore investigated the significance of marginal margins in patients treated with preoperative RT for extremity STS, reporting long-term local control and limb preservation endpoints. METHODS: The records of 317 adults at the University of Florida with nonmetastatic extremity STS treated from 1980 to 2008 with preoperative RT as part of a limb conservation strategy were reviewed. The median follow-up was 4.7 years (8.3 years for living patients). The median tumor size was 10 cm (range, 2-36 cm), and 86% were high grade. The median RT dose was 50.4 Gy (range, 12.5-57.6 Gy). Margins were classified as wide/radical (n = 105), marginal (n = 179), contaminated (n = 15), positive (n = 17), or unknown (n = 1). Endpoints were local control (LC), amputation-free survival (AFS), cause-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Five-year CSS and OS rates were 62% and 59%, respectively. Five-year LC and AFS was 93% and 89%, respectively. AFS by margin status was 64%, 83%, 97%, and 92% for positive, contaminated, marginal, and wide/radical margins, respectively (P<.005). Marginal excision following preoperative RT resulted in equivalent LC and AFS compared with wide/radical margins. CONCLUSIONS: Marginal resection after preoperative RT does not compromise LC or AFS in extremity STS. This finding may be related to radiosterilization of tumor cells within the reactive zone following preoperative RT.
Subject(s)
Sarcoma/radiotherapy , Sarcoma/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Combined Modality Therapy , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of transanal excision (TAE) combined with radiotherapy for rectal adenocarcinoma, assess the ability of pretreatment endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) to predict failures, and determine the prognostic value of downstaging and complete pathological response. DESIGN: Retrospective outcomes study. SETTING: Radiation oncology clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-eight patients with rectal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: The medical records of patients treated with radiotherapy from 1998 to 2008 and followed for a median of 5.9 years were reviewed. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier estimates of freedom from selected endpoints at 5 years after treatment were: overall survival, 79%; cause-specific survival, 91%; local control, 90%; and freedom from distant metastasis, 76%. Seven patients (21%) had eventual abdominoperineal resection or lower anterior resection, four patients had local recurrence, and three patients had incomplete treatment or poor margins. T3 lesions clinically staged by EUS were a predictor of local failure (P=0.0110), but not distant metastasis (P=0.35). Patients with either a pathological or clinical T3 lesion did not have a significantly greater rate of metastasis (P=0.096). Patients who were downstaged did not have a significantly different rate of local recurrence or metastasis. Patients who experienced a complete pathological response did not have a significantly different rate of local control or distant metastasis. CONCLUSION: Patients with early-stage rectal lesions who undergo preoperative or postoperative radiation and TAE have similar outcomes to those who undergo abdominoperineal resection; local recurrence was higher for patients with T3 lesions when both were compared. Abdominal surgery should be considered for these patients. TAE is reasonable when patients are unwilling or unable to tolerate the morbidity of traditional transabdominal surgery.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/radiotherapy , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Rectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Adenocarcinoma/diagnostic imaging , Adenocarcinoma/secondary , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anal Canal , Endosonography , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Neoplasm, Residual , Predictive Value of Tests , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Rectal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Survival RateABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: After radiation therapy (RT), circulating plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) released in response to RT damage to tissue can be measured within hours. We examined for a correlation between cfDNA measured during the first week of therapy and early and late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients were eligible for enrollment if they planned to receive proton or photon RT for nonmetastatic prostate cancer in the setting of an intact prostate or after prostatectomy. Blood was collected before treatment and on sequential treatment days for the first full week of therapy. Toxicity assessments were performed at baseline, weekly during RT, and 6 months and 12 months after RT. Data were analyzed to examine correlations among patient-reported GI and GU toxicities. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were evaluable for this study. Four (7%) and 3 (6%) patients experienced acute and late grade 2 GI toxicity, respectively. Twenty-two (41%) and 18 (35%) patients experienced acute and late grade 2 GU toxicity, respectively. No patients developed grade 3 or higher toxicity. Grade 2 acute GI toxicity, but not grade 2 acute GU toxicity, was significantly correlated with pre-RT cfDNA levels and on all days 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 of RT (P < .005). Grade 2 late GI toxicity, but not GU toxicity, was significantly correlated with pre-RT cfDNA levels (P = .021). CONCLUSIONS: Based on this preliminary study, cfDNA levels can potentially predict the subset of patients destined to develop GI toxicity during prostate cancer treatment. Given that the toxicity profiles of the various fractionations and modalities are highly similar, the data support the expectation that cfDNA could provide a biological estimate to complement the dose-volume histogram. A test of this hypothesis is under evaluation in a National Cancer Institute-funded multi-institutional study.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is technically demanding, and implementation has been hindered by a steep learning curve. Despite widespread concern about the successful performance of this procedure following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACR) treatment, we hypothesized that safe and effective MIE could be performed in this setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed our prospective database of patients undergoing MIE for esophageal cancer at our institution between January 2008 and February 2010. We analyzed the association of NACR on perioperative outcomes and compared them with those patients undergoing MIE without NACR. NACR was used in ≥T2 or N+ tumors. RESULTS: A total of 61 consecutive patients underwent a planned MIE. A complete MIE or hybrid procedure was performed in 58 patients (95%), while 3 patients were unresectable. Median age was 67 years (range 38-85). Anastomoses were performed in the cervical region in 47 patients (81%) while 11 patients had an anastomosis in the right chest. Serious complications included: 3 cervical anastomotic leaks (5%), 2 thoracic duct leaks (4%), 12 pneumonias (21%), 10 atrial fibrillations (18%), and 1 death in a patient not undergoing NACR. NACR was used in 41 patients. There was no significant difference in estimated blood loss (EBL), complications, or negative pathologic margins in patients undergoing NACR with MIE vs. MIE alone (P=NS). Median number of lymph nodes excised and PostOp LOS was 15 and 11 in patients undergoing NACR compared with 13 and 9 in those undergoing MIE alone (P=NS). CONCLUSION: MIE is safe following NACR. Excellent results can be achieved with this operation in patients with advanced tumors.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Chemoradiotherapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Esophagectomy , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/therapy , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Combined Modality Therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Survival RateABSTRACT
Antiangiogenic therapy has shown promise in the treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Two classes of antiangiogenic drugs, the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody bevacizumab and the tyrosine kinase inhibitors sorafenib, sunitinib and pazopanib, have shown efficacy in patients with RCC and are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for treatment of this cancer. In practice, the clinical benefit of antiangiogenic drugs in RCC has been heterogeneous, and in patients who do respond, benefits are modest and/or short-lived. To improve efficacy, combination targeted therapy has been attempted, but with either very limited additional efficacy or nontolerable toxicities. Recent advances in the molecular understanding of tumor angiogenesis and mechanism of resistance, along with the rapid development of targeted drug discovery, have made it possible to further explore novel combination therapy for RCC.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/blood supply , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/blood supply , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Humans , Neovascularization, Pathologic/drug therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To report long-term outcomes following radiotherapy for desmoid tumors in children and young adults and identify variables impacting local-regional control and treatment complications. PROCEDURE: From 1978 to 2008, 30 patients <30 years old were treated with radiotherapy for a pathologically confirmed desmoid tumor. The median age at radiotherapy was 23.7 years old (range, 10.3-29.9). Fifteen patients underwent definitive radiotherapy, 14 received radiotherapy after gross total resection, and 1 received preoperative radiotherapy. Sixteen patients received 1.8 Gy once daily and 14 received 1.2 Gy twice daily. Variables analyzed for prognostic value included gender, age at diagnosis, primary or recurrent presentation, age at radiotherapy, tumor site, tumor size, extent of resection, fractionation schedule, and radiotherapy dose. RESULTS: The actuarial 15-year overall survival and local-regional control rates were 96% and 55%, respectively. Local-regional control in patients <18 years old at the time of radiotherapy was 20% versus 63% in those 18-30 years old (P = 0.08). Local-regional control rates for tumors receiving ≥ 55 Gy and < 55 Gy were 79% and 30%, respectively (P = 0.02). No other factors had a statistically significant association with local-regional control by univariate analysis. Twelve of 30 patients experienced grade 3-4 complications, including pathologic fractures, impaired range of motion, pain, and in-field skin cancers. CONCLUSIONS: The role of radiotherapy in managing young patients with desmoid tumors remains unclear. Younger patient age is associated with inferior local-regional control following RT. In children and young adults, doses ≥55 Gy were associated with improved tumor control, but also lead to increased risk of complications.
Subject(s)
Fibromatosis, Aggressive/radiotherapy , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Child , Fibromatosis, Aggressive/complications , Fibromatosis, Aggressive/mortality , Humans , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Radiotherapy/methods , Radiotherapy Dosage , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Few published articles describe outcomes following definitive radiation for unresectable pediatric and young adult nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma (NRSTS). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prognostic factors, outcomes, and complications in patients age 30 years or younger with NRSTS treated at the University of Florida from 1973 to 2002. PROCEDURE: Nineteen pediatric and young adult patients with NRSTS were treated with radiotherapy after biopsy. Thirteen patients had high-grade tumors. The median age at radiotherapy was 19.6 years; the median dose was 55.2 Gy. Twelve patients received chemotherapy. Prognostic factors for local recurrence, distant metastases, and survival were analyzed. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 2.6 years. The 5-year local-control rate was 40%. Nine out of 13 local failures occurred in the absence of metastatic disease. All patients with local failures died of their cancer, and 8 patients died without evidence of distant metastases. There was a trend toward improved local control with low/intermediate-grade tumors. Freedom from distant metastases at 5 years was 68%. Fourteen patients died of their disease. The 5-year overall survival was 37%. There was one grade 4 complication based on NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3. CONCLUSION: Young patients with unresectable NRSTS have a poor outcome thereby justifying current study efforts focused on treatment intensification. By demonstrating that all patients with local recurrence died of disease and more than half of these deaths occurred in the absence of distant spread, these results suggests that improved means of local control may translate into improvement in survival.
Subject(s)
Sarcoma/radiotherapy , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Neoplasm Metastasis , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Radiotherapy Dosage , Retrospective Studies , Sarcoma/pathology , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/pathology , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Compared with radical resection alone, perioperative radiation therapy (RT) combined with neurovascular preserving surgery is the standard for the management of virgin soft-tissue sarcomas. Yet, the optimal management of a local recurrence remains unclear. We report outcomes of patients with locally recurrent soft-tissue sarcoma treated with resection and reirradiation at the University of Florida. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of patients treated with primary conservative surgery and radiation for soft-tissue sarcoma followed by salvage resection and reirradiation for a local recurrence at our institution. RESULTS: We analyzed 23 patients treated between 1976 and 2014 (median follow-up, 46 mo). Tumor sites included: proximal extremity, 11 patients; trunk, 6; distal extremity, 5; and head and neck, 1. All patients had conservative gross total resection of their recurrent tumor, without amputation. For reirradiation, 16 patients received external-beam RT alone, 6 received external-beam RT and brachytherapy, and 1 received brachytherapy alone. Two patients received chemotherapy. After retreatment, the 5-year overall survival, cause-specific survival, local control, and distant control rates were 39%, 42%, 46%, and 60%, respectively. Ten patients experienced local recurrences, 1 experienced regional recurrence, and 9 developed distant metastases. Retreatment-related complications ranged from delayed wound healing to limb amputation; 8 patients required amputation. Only 3 patients remained disease-free at last follow-up. No statistically significant associations were found between treatment factors (eg, RT dose) and local control. CONCLUSIONS: Achieving local control of recurrent soft-tissue sarcoma is challenging. Treatment with reoperation and reirradiation can lead to debilitating complications affecting function and quality of life.
Subject(s)
Re-Irradiation/adverse effects , Sarcoma/radiotherapy , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Brachytherapy/adverse effects , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Salvage Therapy , Sarcoma/mortality , Sarcoma/pathology , Sarcoma/surgery , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/mortality , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/pathology , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This article in the Users' Guide to the Urological Literature series examines studies that provide information about prognosis for evidence-based clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Studies of prognosis are introduced to the reader in the context of a clinical scenario that raises questions about the expected outcome for a patient. Critical appraisal of prognostic studies addresses the 3 questions. 1) Are the results valid? 2) What are the results? 3) Can I apply the results to the care of my patients? RESULTS: To assess the validity of a cohort study that addresses a question of prognosis, the reader should first ask whether the sample of patients under investigation were representative and sufficiently homogeneous with respect to prognostic risk. Investigators should measure all plausible determinants of outcome (prognostic or risk factors) and present results for all subgroups in which the prognosis differs substantially. The reader should ask whether followup was sufficiently complete, and whether investigators used objective, unbiased and patient relevant outcomes. The results should address the likelihood of the outcomes of interest and the precision of the estimates. Finally the reader should ask how similar the study patients and treatment are to his/her patients, and whether followup was sufficiently long. CONCLUSIONS: Questions of prognosis have an important role in the practice of urology and are usually best answered by nonrandomized, observational studies. Urologists should critically appraise these studies for validity, impact and applicability before using the results to guide patient care.
Subject(s)
Evidence-Based Medicine , Prognosis , Publishing , Urologic Diseases , Urology , Humans , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
Langerhans cell sarcoma (LCS) is a rare, malignant neoplastic disorder of Langerhans cells thought to arise from antecedent Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) or de novo. There are less than 70 cases of LCS reported in the medical literature, with this case being the first report of primary vulvar LCS. We present the case of a 73-year-old female with a painful 2â¯cm ulcerated lesion of the right labia majora. The patient was treated with oral antibiotics without resolution. On referral to gynecologic oncology an office biopsy showed LCS. Surgical excision was performed with clear margins and diagnostic confirmation of LCS by histopathological features and immunohistochemical evaluation. The patient received adjuvant radiation therapy (45.6â¯Gy). After 33â¯months of surveillance, the patient remains with no evidence of disease. Due to the rarity of this disease, there is a lack of standardized recommendations for adjuvant therapy, including radiotherapy and chemotherapy regimens for both localized and systemic LCS. This case report supports the management of localized disease by surgical excision followed by radiotherapy as effective for preventing recurrence and metastatic progression. Early recognition and treatment are critical for cure, and can be accomplished by prompt referral to a specialist as well as low threshold for biopsy. Further investigation is needed for establishing a standardized management guideline for LCS.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The RadTox assay measures circulating cell-free DNA released in response to radiotherapy (RT)-induced tissue damage. The primary objectives for this clinical trial were to determine whether cell-free DNA numbers measured by the RadTox assay are (1) correlated with body integral dose, (2) lower with proton RT compared with photon RT, and (3) higher with larger prostate cancer RT fields. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients planned to receive proton or photon RT for nonmetastatic prostate cancer in the setting of an intact prostate or postprostatectomy were eligible for the trial. Plasma was collected pre-RT and at 5 additional daily collection points beginning 24 hours after the initiation of RT. Data from 54 evaluable patients were analyzed to examine any correlations among RadTox scores with body-integral dose, RT modality (photon versus proton), and RT field size (prostate or prostate bed versus whole pelvis). RESULTS: Body integral dose was significantly associated with the peak post-RT RadTox score (P = .04). Patients who received photon RT had a significant increase in peak post-RT RadTox score (P = .04), average post-RT RadTox score (P = .04), and day-2 RadTox score (all minus the pre-RT values for each patient) as compared with patients who received proton RT. Field size was not significantly associated with RadTox score. CONCLUSION: RadTox is correlated with body integral dose and correctly predicts which patients receive proton versus photon RT. Data collection remains ongoing for patient-reported RT toxicity outcomes to determine whether RadTox scores are correlated with toxicity.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To report prognostic factors and long-term outcomes in adults with Ewing sarcoma treated with definitive radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed patients 18 years old and above with nonmetastatic Ewing sarcoma treated with radiotherapy +/- chemotherapy or surgery. Outcomes were stratified by age (30 and above vs. younger than 30 y), soft tissue extension, tumor size (≥8.5 vs. <8.5 cm), tumor location, resection (yes vs. no), and treatment era (1970-1992 vs. 1993-2012). Toxicities were scored using the RTOG criteria. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients (21 women) were treated with radiotherapy. Average age at diagnosis: 26.7 years (38 patients below 30 vs. 17 patients 30 y and above). A total of 43 had soft tissue extension (78%). Median tumor size: 8.5 cm. Most tumors were in the pelvis (40%), followed by the lower (27%) and upper (24%) extremities. All but 1 patient received chemotherapy; 13 underwent resection. Median dose: 55 Gy. Median follow-up: 3.6 years; 17.5 years for living patients. The 5-year overall (OS) and cause-specific survival (CSS) rates were both 46%. OS and CSS rates were unaffected by age (P=0.97), tumor size (P=0.12), or tumor location (P=0.99). Soft tissue extension portended a significantly poorer prognosis for 5-year OS and CSS: 37% vs. 82% (with and without, respectively; P=0.04). Patients who underwent resection had improved 5-year OS and CSS: 77% vs. 37%, respectively (P=0.01). Patients treated after 1993 had improved 5-year OS: 58% vs. 37% (P=0.0264). CONCLUSIONS: Adult patients with Ewing sarcoma experience similar treatment outcomes regardless of age at diagnosis. Soft tissue extension represents a poor prognostic factor. Aggressive trimodality therapy achieved the highest OS and CSS.
Subject(s)
Bone Neoplasms/mortality , Bone Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality , Sarcoma, Ewing/mortality , Sarcoma, Ewing/radiotherapy , Academic Medical Centers , Adolescent , Adult , Bone Neoplasms/pathology , Bone Neoplasms/surgery , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Cohort Studies , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/therapy , Orthopedic Procedures/methods , Prognosis , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Sarcoma, Ewing/pathology , Sarcoma, Ewing/surgery , Statistics, Nonparametric , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome , United States , Young AdultABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective outcomes review. OBJECTIVE: To analyze and report long-term outcomes in a cohort of patients treated with radiotherapy (RT) for symptomatic hemangioma of a vertebral body. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Data are scarce on the rate of tumor control with long-term (>5 yr) follow-up after RT for symptomatic hemangioma of a vertebral body. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients treated at our institution between 1971 and 2008 for symptomatic hemangioma of a vertebral body, updated their follow-up, analyzed complications, and calculated the tumor control rate. Tumor control by imaging was defined as no increase in tumor size on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) scan. Clinical tumor control was defined as no symptoms of recurrent tumor. RESULTS: Ten patients were eligible for analysis. All patients had pain from visible hemangioma at the time of radiotherapy for which surgical resection or interventional radiology procedures were likely to result in high morbidity. Tumors were located in the lumbar (40%), thoracic (50%), or cervical (10%) areas of the spine. The mean radiotherapy dose delivered was 47âGy.Mean imaging follow-up after completion of radiotherapy was 8.1 years; mean clinical follow-up was 21.2 years. The tumor control rate was 90% (9/10). One patient who may have developed a tumor recurrence had radiographic and clinical evidence of tumor progression 30 years after radiotherapy. The actuarial rate of tumor control was 100% at 5, 10, 20, and 25 years. There was no grade more than or equal to three treatment toxicities, no evidence of malignant transformation, and no evidence of second tumors in treatment area (with the possible exception of the one tumor recurrence). CONCLUSION: RT for symptomatic hemangioma of the spine provides long-term tumor control with a low risk of serious complications. Radiotherapy is a good option when surgery or an interventional radiology procedure is high-risk. Our preferred dose is 45âGy at 1.8âGy/fraction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
Subject(s)
Hemangioma/diagnostic imaging , Hemangioma/radiotherapy , Spinal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adolescent , Adult , Cervical Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hemangioma/surgery , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/radiotherapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Neoplasms/surgery , Thoracic Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Thoracic Vertebrae/surgery , Time Factors , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The most common site of sarcoma metastasis is the lung. Surgical resection of pulmonary metastases and chemotherapy are treatment options that have been employed, but many patients are poor candidates for these treatments for multiple host or tumor-related reasons. In this group of patients, radiation might provide a less morbid treatment alternative. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of radiotherapy in the treatment of metastatic sarcoma to the lung. METHODS: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) was used to treat 117 pulmonary metastases in 44 patients. Patients were followed with serial computed tomography imaging of the chest. The primary endpoint was failure of control of a pulmonary lesion as measured by continued growth. Radiation-associated complications were recorded. RESULTS: The majority of patients (84%) received a total dose of 50 Gy per metastatic nodule utilizing an image-guided SBRT technique. The median interval follow-up was 14.2 months (range 1.6-98.6 months). Overall survival was 82% at two years and 50% at five years. Of 117 metastatic nodules treated, six nodules showed failure of treatment (95% control rate). Twenty patients (27%) developed new metastatic lesions and underwent further SBRT. The side effects of SBRT included transient radiation pneumonitis (n=6), cough (n=2), rib fracture (n=1), chronic pain (n=1), dermatitis (n=1), and dyspnea (n=1). CONCLUSION: Stereotactic body radiotherapy is an effective and safe treatment for the ablation of pulmonary metastasis from sarcoma. Further work is needed to evaluate the optimal role of SBRT relative to surgery or chemotherapy for treatment of metastatic sarcoma.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Radiation therapy (RT) is often used in the treatment of unresectable or recurrent aggressive fibromatosis (also known as desmoid tumor) typically with excellent local control. Prior reports have suggested that local control in pediatric patients with aggressive fibromatosis is poor. We aimed to report a long-term single-institution experience with the radiotherapeutic treatment of these tumors with a focus on age-dependent outcomes. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 101 patients treated with RT for aggressive fibromatosis between 1975 and 2015 at a single institution were identified. A variety of demographic and treatment-related variables were abstracted from patients' medical records. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to investigate the relationship between these variables and local control. RESULTS: Overall survival was excellent (98% and 95% at 5 and 10 years, respectively); local control was likewise excellent (82% and 78% at 5 and 10 years, respectively). Patients aged <20 years at diagnosis had significantly worse 5-year local control than those aged >40 years at diagnosis (72% vs 97%; hazard ratio, 9.0; P = .009). Patients treated with once-daily fractionation had significantly improved 5-year local control compared with those treated with twice-daily fractionation (90% vs 73%; hazard ratio, 0.3; P = .008). Neither the presence of gross versus microscopic residual disease, initial versus recurrent presentation, number of prior surgical procedures, nor tumor size had any effect on 5-year local control. In a total of 36.6% of patients, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 or 4 toxicity developed following treatment; the frequency of toxicities was reduced in patients treated during or after 1995 (24.5%) relative to those treated prior to 1995 (51.9%, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: RT for aggressive fibromatosis offers excellent local control and should remain the standard of care for patients with unresectable or recurrent disease. Younger patients have diminished local control relative to older patients, suggesting possible biological differences contributing to radioresistance in the pediatric and young adult population.
Subject(s)
Age Factors , Fibromatosis, Aggressive/radiotherapy , Adolescent , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Child , Child, Preschool , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Female , Fibromatosis, Aggressive/mortality , Fibromatosis, Aggressive/pathology , Humans , Infant , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/radiotherapy , Neoplasm, Residual , Radiation Injuries/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Tumor Burden , Young AdultABSTRACT
Castration-resistant prostate cancer is an incurable disease. To date, six agents-abiraterone, enzalutamide, docetaxel, cabazitaxel, radium-223 and sipuleucel-T- have shown clinical efficacy in phase III clinical trials, leading to their FDA approval. Patients are typically sequenced through most or all of these agents, and then eventually succumb to their disease. Development of new treatments remains an unmet need. We report a case of a patient who progressed on enzalutamide with a single enlarging metastatic lesion, was treated with ablative stereotactic body radiation therapy while maintaining the same systemic treatment, who then had durable complete remission. Our findings have important clinical implications and suggest novel clinical trials for this difficult to treat disease.
ABSTRACT
Chemotherapy and targeted therapies are effective palliative options for numerous unresectable or metastatic cancers. However, treatment resistance inevitably develops leading to mortality. In a subset of patients, systemic therapy appears to control the majority of tumors leaving 5 or less to progress, a phenomenon described as oligoprogression. Reasoning that the majority of lesions remain responsive to ongoing systemic chemotherapy, we hypothesized that local treatment of the progressing lesions would confer a benefit. The present study describes the cases of 5 patients whose metastatic disease was largely controlled by chemotherapy. The oligoprogressive lesions (≤5) were treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), justifying continued use of an effective systemic regimen. A total of 5 patients with metastatic disease on chemotherapy, with ≤5 progressing lesions amenable to SBRT, were treated with ablative intent. Primary tumor site and histology were as follows: 2 with metastatic colon adenocarcinoma, 2 with metastatic rectal adenocarcinoma and 1 with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Imaging was performed prior to SBRT and every 3 months after SBRT. In total, 4 out of the 5 patients achieved disease control for >7 months with SBRT, without changing chemotherapy regimen. The median time to chemotherapy change was 9 months, with a median follow-up time of 9 months. The patient who failed to respond developed progressive disease outside of the SBRT field at 3 months. In conclusion, the addition of SBRT to chemotherapy is an option for the overall systemic control of oligoprogressive disease.