Pancreatectomy Induces Cancer-Promoting Neutrophil Extracellular Traps.

BACKGROUND: Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) occur when neutrophil chromatin is decondensed and extruded into the extracellular space in a web-like structure. Originally described as an anti-microbial function, this process has been implicated in the pathogenesis of pancreatic disease. In addition, NETs are upregulated during physiologic wound-healing and coagulation. This study evaluated how the inflammatory response to pancreatic surgery influences NET formation. METHODS: For this study, 126 patients undergoing pancreatectomy gave consent before participation. Plasma was collected at several time points (preoperatively and through the postoperative outpatient visit). Plasma levels of NET markers, including cell-free DNA (cfDNA), citrullinated histone H3 (CitH3), interleukin (IL)-8, IL-6, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Patient clinical data were retrospectively collected from a prospectively maintained database. RESULTS: After pancreatic resection, NET markers (cfDNA and CitH3) were elevated, peaking on postoperative days 3 and 4. This increase in NETs was due to an inherent change in neutrophil biology. Postoperatively, NET-inducing cytokines (IL-8, IL-6, and G-CSF) were increased, peaking early in the postoperative course. The patients undergoing the robotic approach had a reduction in NETs during the postoperative period compared with those who underwent the open approach. The patients who experienced a pancreatic leak had an increase in NET markers during the postoperative period. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatectomy induces cancer-promoting NET formation. The minimally invasive robotic approach may induce fewer NETs, although the current analysis was limited by selection bias. Pancreatic leak resulted in increased NETs. Further study into the potential for NET inhibition during the perioperative period is warranted.

Postoperative Hypophosphatemia as a Prognostic Factor for Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: A Systematic Review.

Background and Objectives: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is one of the most challenging complications after pancreatic resections, associated with prolonged hospital stay and high mortality. Early identification of pancreatic fistula is necessary for the treatment to be effective. Several prognostic factors have been identified, although it is unclear which one is the most crucial. Some studies show that post-pancreatectomy hypophosphatemia may be associated with the development of POPF. The aim of this systematic review was to determine whether postoperative hypophosphatemia can be used as a prognostic factor for postoperative pancreatic fistula. Materials and Methods: The systematic literature review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations (PRISMA) and was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). The PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched up to the 31st of January 2022 for studies analyzing postoperative hypophosphatemia as a prognostic factor for POPF. Data including study characteristics, patient characteristics, operation type, definitions of postoperative hypophosphatemia and postoperative pancreatic fistula were extracted. Results: Initially, 149 articles were retrieved. After screening and final assessment, 3 retrospective studies with 2893 patients were included in this review. An association between postoperative hypophosphatemia and POPF was found in all included studies. Patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy were more likely to develop severe hypophosphatemia compared to patients undergoing proximal pancreatectomy. Serum phosphate levels on postoperative day 4 (POD 4) and postoperative day 5 (POD 5) remained significantly lower in patients who developed leak-related complications showing a slower recovery of hypophosphatemia from postoperative day 3 (POD 3) through postoperative day 7 (POD 7). Moreover, body mass index (BMI) higher than 30 kg/m2, soft pancreatic tissue, abnormal white blood cell count on postoperative day 3 (POD 3), and shorter surgery time were associated with leak-related complications (LRC) and lower phosphate levels. Conclusions: Early postoperative hypophosphatemia might be used as a prognostic biomarker for early identification of postoperative pancreatic fistula. However, more studies are needed to better identify significant cut-off levels of postoperative hypophosphatemia and development of hypophosphatemia in the postoperative period.

Effect of intraoperative secretin on operative outcomes in pancreatic resection: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Objectives: We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to determine if using Secretin intra-operatively to identify leaks and subsequently target operative intervention would decrease the frequency of clinically significant post-operative pancreatic fistula formation. METHODS: Patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy were randomized to receive intra-operative Secretin or placebo intra-operatively following the completed pancreaticojejunostomy or closure of the cut remnant stump. If a potential leak was identified, targeted therapy with directed suture placement was performed. RESULTS: 170 patients were randomized; 83 receiving placebo and 87 receiving Secretin. The rate of clinically significant fistula formation was 3% (3/87) in the Secretin group and 6% (5/83) in the placebo group (p = 0.489). The rate of biochemical leak was 29% (25/87) in the Secretin group and 19% (16/83) in the placebo group (p = 0.157). There were no Grade C post-operative fistula in either group. Of the 9% of patients in the Secretin group who had a targeted intra-operative intervention, none developed a clinically significant fistula. Adverse events were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to placebo, intra-operative Secretin administration was not associated with an overall reduction in clinically significant pancreatic fistula formation. However, patients with an intra-operative leak identified by Secretin may benefit from intervention (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02160808).

Blumgart's technique of pancreaticojejunostomy: Analysis of safety and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Blumgart's pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) has been described with low pancreatic leak rates. This study aimed to evaluate our experience with this technique regarding the pancreatic leak and other perioperative outcomes. METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of a cohort of 81 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy in our department from January 2011 to February 2018. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of a clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) and analysis of its risk factors. RESULTS: The CR-POPF rate was 12.3%. Fistula risk score (FRS) was the only significant risk factor for the occurrence of overall POPF in multivariate analysis. However, none of the other factors including FRS was found to be significantly associated with CR-POPF risk. A strong positive correlation was found between the CR-POPF and the incidence of delayed gastric emptying, post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage and increased length of hospital stay. CONCLUSION: Blumgart's technique is a safe technique of pancreatico-enteric anastomosis with low rates of CR-POPF. CR-POPF with this technique is independent of most of the preoperative and intraoperative factors. Therefore, this technique can be used for all types of the pancreas with consistently good results.

Pancreaticogastrostomy - an alternate for dealing with pancreatic remnant after pancreaticoduodenectomy - experience from a tertiary care center of Pakistan.

Whipple's pancreaticoduodenectomy has been refined over the years to be a safe operation though the morbidity rate still remains high (30-50%). Pancreatic fistula is the most important cause of mortality following pancreaticoduodenectomy. To prevent it, surgeons have used two anastomotic techniques: pancreaticojejunostomy and pancreaticogastrostomy. Recent studies found that pancreaticogastrostomy is associated with fewer overall complications than pancreaticojejunostomy. This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent Whipple's at Aga Khan University Hospital and had pancreaticogastrostomy as a preferred anastomosis for pancreatic stump. Forty four patients met the inclusion criteria, 27 were male. No patient developed post-operative pancreatic fistula, 13 (31%) patients had morbidities including delayed gastric emptying 4(9.1%), wound infection 3(6.8%), and haemorrhage 6(13.6%). Mortality is reported to be 5 (11.9%). Pancreaticogastrostomy seems to be a safe alternative and easier anastomosis to perform with less post-operative morbidity and mortality. Further data should become available with greater numbers in the future. .

Prophylactic pasireotide administration following pancreatic resection reduces cost while improving outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pasireotide decreases leak rates after pancreatic resection, though significant drug cost may be prohibitive. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis to determine whether prophylactic pasireotide possesses a reasonable cost profile. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness model compared pasireotide administration after pancreatic resection versus usual care, populated by probabilities of clinical outcomes from a randomized trial and hospital costs (2013 US$) from a university pancreatic disease center. Sensitivity analyses were performed to identify influential clinical components of the model. RESULTS: With the cost of pasireotide included, per patient costs of pancreatectomy, including those for readmission, were lower in the intervention arm (41,769 versus 42,159$; net savings of 390$, or 1%). This was associated with a 56% reduction in pancreatic fistula/pancreatic leak/abscess (PF/PL/A; 21.9-9.2%). Pasireotide cost would need to increase by over 15.4% to make the intervention strategy more costly than usual care. Sensitivity analyses exploring variability of key model inputs demonstrated that the three strongest drivers of cost were (i) cost of pasireotide; (ii) probability of readmission; and (iii) probability of PF/PL/A. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic pasireotide administration following pancreatectomy is cost savings, reducing expensive post-operative sequealae (major complications and readmissions). Pasireotide should be utilized as a cost-saving measure in pancreatic resection. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;113:784-788. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Management of pancreatic ductal leaks and fistulae.

Pancreatic duct leaks can occur as a result of both acute and chronic pancreatitis or in the setting of pancreatic trauma. Manifestations of leaks include pseudocysts, pancreatic ascites, high amylase pleural effusions, disconnected duct syndrome, and internal and external pancreatic fistulas. Patient presentations are highly variable and range from asymptomatic pancreatic cysts to patients with severe abdominal pain and sepsis from infected fluid collections. The diagnosis can often be made by high-quality cross-sectional imaging or during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Because of their complexity, pancreatic leak patients are best managed by a multidisciplinary team comprised of therapeutic endoscopists, interventional radiologists, and surgeons in the field of pancreatic interventions. Minor leaks will often resolve with conservative management while severe leaks will frequently require interventions. Endoscopic treatments for pancreatic duct leaks have replaced surgical interventions in many situations. Interventional radiologists also have the ability to offer therapeutic interventions for many leak patients. The mainstay of endotherapy for pancreatic leaks is transpapillary pancreatic duct stenting with a stent that bridges the leak if possible, but varies based on the manifestation and clinical presentation. Fluid collections that result from leaks, such as pseudocysts, can often be treated by endoscopic transluminal drainage with or without endoscopic ultrasound or by percutaneous drainage. Endoscopic interventions have been shown to be effective and have an acceptable complication rate.

Evaluation and Recalibration of Risk-Stratified Pancreatoduodenectomy Drain Fluid Amylase Removal Criteria.

BACKGROUND: Risk-stratified drain fluid amylase cutoff values for postoperative day 1 (POD1) (DFA1) and POD3 (DFA3) can guide early drain removal after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). The aim of this study was to evaluate and recalibrate cutoff values instituted in Feb 2019 using a prospective sequential cohort. METHODS: We performed a single-institution prospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy following implementation of institution-specific DFA cutoffs in February 2019 through April 2022. DFA values, drain removal, and clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistulas (CR-POPF) were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis determined optimal cutoff values. RESULTS: In total, 267 patients, 173 (65%) low-risk and 94 (35%) high-risk, underwent 228 (85%) open and 39 (15%) robotic pancreatoduodenectomies. Seven (4%) low-risk patients and 21 (22%) high-risk patients developed CR-POPF. Drains were removed in 147 (55%) patients before/on POD3, with 1 (0.7%) CR-POPF. In low-risk patients, CR-POPF was excluded with 100% sensitivity if DFA1 < 286 (area under curve, AUC = 0.893, p = 0.001) or DFA3 < 97 (AUC = 0.856, p = 0.002). DFA1 < 137 (AUC = 0.786, p < 0.001) or DFA3 < 56 (AUC = 0.819, p < 0.001) were 100% sensitive in high-risk patients. Previously established DFA1 cutoffs of 100 (low-risk) and < 26 (high-risk) were 100% sensitive, while DFA3 cutoffs of 300 (low-risk) and 200 (high-risk) had 57% and 91% sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: Within a learning health system, we recalibrated post-PD drain removal thresholds to DFA1 ≤ 300 and DFA3 ≤ 100 for low-risk and DFA1 ≤ 100 and DFA3 ≤ 50 for high-risk patients. This methodology is generalizable to other centers for developing institution-specific criteria to optimize safe early drain removal.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Pancreatic Duct Interventions.

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided pancreatic duct drainage is one of the most challenging procedures in therapeutic endoscopy. Technical success is lower than for other therapeutic EUS procedures. However, when successful in a clear clinical indication, this procedure can offer a useful therapeutic alternative and improves the overall clinical success of the endoscopic approach. Current challenges include the standardization of clinical indications and of the techniques used for accessing the pancreatic duct, the strategy for mid-term and long-term management, and definition of the scope of the training that should be offered to a few highly experienced endoscopists.

A Rare Case of Paraesophageal Hernia Repair Complicated by Pancreatic Injury.

Esophageal hernias are anatomical defect that affects up to 50% of the population. While they may be asymptomatic, hernias may also result in reflux and dysphagia, among other symptoms. In such cases, hernia repair is warranted. The most common type of repair is laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication, which is usually well-tolerated. Herein, we present a rare case of paraesophageal hernia repair complicated by pancreatic injury and pancreatic leak.

Pancreatic Leak After a Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Severe adhesions in patients with previous abdominal operations may lead to a more challenging subsequent bariatric surgery [1, 2]. In this context, sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the preferred weight loss surgery since it solely involves stomach resection (without bowel involvement) in one abdominal compartment. Additionally, SG has lower complication rates and a shorter operative time than other bariatric procedures [3, 4]. In this paper, we present a multimedia video of the management of a pancreatic leak after SG in a patient with multiple previous abdominal surgeries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 40-year-old female with a BMI of 36 kg/m2 and obesity-related comorbidities presented to our clinic for bariatric surgery evaluation. The patient had a history of a motor vehicle accident requiring a splenectomy, a liver laceration requiring packing and reoperation with an open abdomen for more than a month. This was followed by a hernia repair with component separation. Preoperative workup was completed, including an upper endoscopy (EGD) that was negative for esophagitis. The computed tomography (CT) scan showed an area in the left upper quadrant with no bowel loops adherent to the abdominal wall, thus a safer area for accessing the abdominal cavity (Fig. 1). The SG itself was challenging due to severe adhesions. These adhesions were between the bowel and abdominal wall, bowel and bowel, stomach and liver, and posterior stomach and pancreas (video). Once adhesiolysis was completed, the stomach was tailored successfully without intraoperative complications. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 1 with stable vitals and laboratory exams while tolerating a liquid diet. RESULTS: On postoperative day 2, the patient returned to the emergency department with abdominal pain, increased heart rate (120 per minute), and a white blood cell count (WBC) of 20,000 th/µL. The CT scan showed a left upper quadrant collection with no evidence of air or contrast extravasation from the sleeve, as shown in Fig. 2. The patient became unstable and did not respond adequately to resuscitation efforts. Due to the extensive dissection in the primary operation, we elected to perform a laparoscopic exploration on an urgent basis. A collection (dark fluid) was noted in the left upper quadrant, but no sleeve staple line leak was found even with the air leak test (Fig. 2). Drainage and wash out were completed, and 2 abdominal drains were placed. Although the patient had symptomatic improvement postoperatively, an EGD with fluoroscopy was repeated, and no leak was noted (Fig. 3). The fluid evaluation showed increased lipase suggesting the diagnosis of a pancreatic leak. A liquid diet was initiated, and the initial drain in the left upper quadrant was exchanged to a higher caliber one (16F 40 cm locking loop drain). The patient was stable and eventually discharged home on postoperative day 6. Eventually, the drains were draining less than 10 mL and then downsized and removed. The patient's weight loss journey continued afterward with no other complications at 10-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic leak is a rare but potentially severe complication after SG, especially in the difficult abdomen.

Closure and anastomosis of the pancreas using a four-needle three-loop suture device.

Pancreatic juice can leak not only from the main pancreatic duct but also from unclosed ductal branches appearing on the pancreatic stump. We have developed a suture device consisting of three loops of suture attached to four small-curvature needles with the aim to maximize the area of pancreatic parenchyma to be ligated and reduce the number of punctures made on the pancreas during pancreatic closure or anastomosis. In pancreatojejunostomy, the dorsal wall of the jejunum and then the pancreatic parenchyma are sutured using the four needles. Following duct-to-mucosa anastomosis, the ventral jejunal wall is sutured, and the three threads are finally tied sequentially to complete the reconstruction following the Blumgart method. In distal pancreatectomy, the pancreatic stump is sutured from the dorsal aspect sequentially using the four needles, before or after the pancreatic transection. The three threads are then respectively tied on the ventral surface of the pancreas. This device was used in six pancreatoduodenectomies (including two minimally invasive procedures) and five distal pancreatectomies. A postoperative pancreatic fistula requiring additional drainage or repositioning of abdominal drains developed in two patients. No adverse events associated with this device were encountered. The four-needle three-loop suture device can be an alternative to conventional staplers or sutures for closure and anastomosis of the pancreatic stump.

A Novel Radiological Predictor for Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula After Stapled Distal Pancreatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Distal pancreatectomy (DP) is the main surgical treatment of benign and malignant lesions located in pancreatic body and tail. Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) following DP is still a considerable cause of morbidity. Identification of risk factors for POPF after DP might provide some preventive applications. We aimed to evaluate the factors affecting POPF after DP and to present a new and easy radiological predictive factor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients underwent DP with stapler closure were included. Several risk factors for clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF) were analyzed. Additionally, computed tomography findings of pancreatic thickness (PT), main pancreatic duct diameter (MPDD), and PT/MPDD ratio were evaluated for POPF. RESULTS: CR-POPF was observed in 10 patients (29.4%). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that previous abdominal surgery and PT/MPDD ratio were predictive factors for CR-POPF after DP (P = 0.040, P = 0.034, respectively). The cutoff value for the PT/MPDD ratio was 8. CONCLUSION: A PT/MPDD ratio greater than 8 (a wide pancreas with a narrow duct) is a significant predictive factor for CR-POPF following DP.

Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Is Associated with Decreased Clinically Relevant Pancreatic Fistulas: a Propensity-Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is a major complication that adversely affects recovery. The robotic approach may decrease the incidence of this complication. This propensity-matched analysis evaluates the impact of robotic PD (RPD) on CR-POPF. METHODS: Patients undergoing PD after the learning curve at a high-volume academic medical center were reviewed. CR-POPF outcomes after open PD (OPD) and RPD were compared. Logistic regression and propensity score matching (PSM) were used to define the independent effect of RPD on CR-POPF. RESULTS: Of 865 PDs performed over the study period, 405 (46.8%) were OPD and 460 (53.2%) were RPD. RPD was associated with a similar overall POPF rate, but a lower incidence of CR-POPF (6.7% vs. 15.8%, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, RPD was an independent predictor of lower CR-POPF (OR 0.278, p < 0.001). Following propensity matching, RPD continued to be protective against the occurrence of CR-POPF (coefficient = - 0.113, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest single-center PSM analysis to evaluate the impact of robotic approach on pancreatoduodenectomy and suggests that RPD can minimize the clinical impact of pancreatic leaks after PD.

Management of intractable pancreatic leak from iatrogenic pancreatic duct injury following resection of choledochal cyst in an adult patient.

Iatrogenic pancreatic duct injury can occur during resection of the choledochal cyst (CC). We herein present a case of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) developed after resection of the CC in an adult patient with variant anomalous union of pancreatobiliary duct. The 55-year-old female patient underwent surgery after the diagnosis of CC-associated gallbladder cancer. During surgery, the CC mass was accidentally pulled out, by which the intrapancreatic CC portion was torn out from the main pancreatic duct. Since the pancreatic duct stump was not identified due to its small size, repair was not possible. The excavated defect at the pancreas head was closed securely combined with insertion of multiple drains. Postoperative POPF and peripancreatic fluid collection developed and the patient had to be fasted for 4 weeks. She was first discharged at 6 weeks after surgery. At 10 weeks, she was readmitted due to progression of peripancreatic fluid collection, which was controlled by percutaneous drain insertion. At 6 months, she was readmitted again due to repeated progression of peripancreatic fluid collection, which were controlled by endoscopic transmural duodenocystostomy. It took 8 months to resolve the pancreatic duct injury-associated pancreatitis. The experience in this case suggests that iatrogenic pancreatic duct injury during resection of CC can induce catastrophic complications, thus special attention should be paid to prevent pancreatic duct injury.

Management of morbidity associated with pancreatic resection during cytoreductive surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer: A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: In ovarian cancer (OC), survival benefit in case of complete cytoreduction with absence of residual tumor has been clearly demonstrated; however, it often requires extensive surgery. Particularly, pancreatic resection during cytoreduction, may severely impact perioperative morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate complication rates and related optimal management of ovarian cancer patients undergoing pancreatic resection as part of cytoreductive surgery. METHODS: Literature was searched for relevant records reporting distal pancreatectomy for advanced ovarian cancer. All cohorts were rated for quality. We focused our analysis on complications related to pancreatic surgical procedures evaluating the following outcomes: pancreatic fistula (PF), abdominal abscess, pancreatitis, iatrogenic diabetes, hemorrhage from splenic vessels and pancreatic-surgery-related mortality. RESULTS: The most frequent complication reported was PF. Similar rates of PF were reported after hand-sewn (20%) or stapled closure (24%). Continued drainage is the standard treatment, and often, the leak can be managed conservatively and does not require re-intervention. Abdominal abscess is the second most frequent complication and generally follows a non-adequately drained PF and often required re-laparotomy. Pancreatitis is a rare event that could be treated conservatively; however, death can occur in case of necrotic evolution. Cases of post-operative hemorrhage due to splenic vessel bleeding have been described and represent an emergency. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of pancreatic surgery and management of possible complications ought to be present in the oncologic-gynecologic armamentarium. All patients should be referred to specialized, dedicated, tertiary centers in order to reduce, promptly recognize and optimally manage complications.

A study on outcome of binding pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy: A prospective observational study.

INTRODUCTION: The type of anastomosis of the pancreas following pancreaticoduodenectomy is often attributed to the reason for pancreatic leak. Results of various randomized trials comparing pancreaticojejunostomy and pancreaticogastrostomy are conflicting one suggesting advantage over the other and vice versa. In this study we intend to critically analyze a novel technique of binding pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to see the outcome of binding pancreaticogastrostomy by evaluating the technical aspects of binding PG and study the incidence of post-operative complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included all patients who had undergone binding pancreaticogastrostomy from Mar 2012 to Mar 2016 at a tertiary care hospital. Patients' data, including patients demographics, type of procedure performed, complications, mortality, hospital stay, postoperative interventional procedures or reoperations were all documented. RESULTS: There were 60 men and 37 women (mean age was 55.4 ±â€¯11.6 years) with a mean BMI of 22.6 Kg/M2. 16% of the patients had evidence of cholangitis and 14 of them had to be stented preoperatively. Ninety-four percent of the patients were operated for malignant cause of obstructive jaundice. The mean operative time was 283 min s and average blood loss during surgery was 352 ml. 36% of the patients were operated by the senior residents undergoing training in Gastro intestinal surgery with the assistance of the available faculty. 60% of the patients had a pancreatic duct diameter less than 3 mm. 72% of the pancreatic stump were soft in consistency. In our study we had 3% patients with pancreatic leak. The most frequent complication was DGE, which was seen in 22% patients. The mean duration of DGE was 13.5 ±â€¯2.6 days. We had 2 deaths within 30 days of surgery of which one was due to massive intraabdominal bleed due to pancreatic leak. None of the parameters like pre-operative and operative parameters like age, bilirubin, total leucocyte count, preoperative stenting, pancreatic duct diameter, texture of pancreas and surgery performed by residents were found to be responsible for pancreatic leak. CONCLUSION: This novel method of binding PG is simple, secure, and reproducible. It possesses several advantages over the conventional PG: it is very easy to perform, it is less traumatic to the pancreatic stump, can be performed in all types of pancreatic stump irrespective of the texture and diameter of the pancreatic duct without any statistically significant adverse outcomes.

The impact of intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy on complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Optimal fluid balance is critical to minimize anastomotic edema in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. We examined the effects of decreased fluid administration on rates of postoperative pancreatic leak and delayed gastric emptying. METHODS: Retrospective study of 105 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy at a single institution from January 2015 through July 2016. Stroke volume variation (SVV) was tracked and titrated during the procedure. A comparative analysis of postoperative complications was performed between patients with a median SVV < 12 during the extirpative and reconstructive phases of the procedure compared with patients with an SVV ≥ 12. RESULTS: Of 64 patients who met selection criteria, 42 (65.6%) had a SVV < 12 and 22 (34.4%) had a SVV ≥ 12. Patients with an SVV ≥ 12 during the extirpative phase of the procedure had lower rates of postoperative pancreatic leaks compared to patients with an SVV < 12 (5.9% vs 21.3%)). Patients with an SVV ≥ 12 during the extirpative phase had lower rates of postoperative delayed gastric emptying compared to patients with an SVV < 12 (41.2% vs 46.8%). CONCLUSION: Goal-directed fluid restriction before the reconstructive phase of pancreaticoduodenectomy may contribute to lower postoperative rates of pancreatic leak and delayed gastric emptying.

Extended pancreatic transection for secure pancreatic reconstruction during pancreaticoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is associated with various surgical complications including healing failure of the pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ). This study intended to ensure blood supply to the pancreatic stump through extended pancreatic transection (EPT). METHODS: This study assessed whether EPT reduces PJ-associated complications and whether EPT is harmful on the remnant pancreatic function. The EPT group included 19 patients undergoing PD, pylorus-preserving PD (PPPD) or hepatopancreaticoduodenectomy. The propensity score matched control group included 45 patients who had undergone PPPD. Pancreatic transection was performed at the level of the celiac axis in the EPT group, by which the pancreatic body was additionally removed by 3 cm in length comparing with the conventional pancreatic transection. RESULTS: A small invagination fissure suspected as the embryonic fusion site was identified at the ventro-caudal edge of the pancreatic body in all patients undergoing EPT. A sizable fissure permitting easy separation of the pancreatic parenchyma was identified in 15 of 19 patients (78.9%). The incidence of significant postoperative pancreatic fistula was significantly lower in the EPT group than in the control group (p=0.047). There was no significant increase in the postoperative de novo diabetes mellitus in EPT group (p=0.60). CONCLUSIONS: The EPT technique contributes to the prevention of major pancreatic fistula without impairing remnant pancreatic function. EPT is feasible for routine clinical application or at least in patients with any known risk of PJ leak.

Therapeutic effect of trans-drain administration of antibiotics in patients showing intractable pancreatic leak-associated pus drainage after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: To cope with intractable pus drainage from persistent pancreatic leak after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), we have empirically performed local administration of high-concentration antibiotics cocktail solution into abdominal drains. The purpose of this study was to assess its therapeutic effect in patients showing intractable pus drainage after PD. METHODS: The study group was 10 patients who underwent trans-drain administration of high-concentration antibiotics cocktail solution. Another 10 patients were selected through propensity score matching for the control group. Their medical records were retrospectively reviewed with focus on comparison of pancreatic fistula (PF)-associated clinical sequences. RESULTS: Postoperative PF of grade B and C occurred in 7 and 3 patients in the study group and 9 and 1 patient in the control group, respectively (p=0.58). In the study group, a mean of 1.8 sessions of antibiotics cocktail solution (imipenem 500 mg and vancomycin 500 mg dissolved in 20 ml of normal saline) was administered. Two patients showed procedure-associated febrile episodes that were spontaneously controlled within 48 hours. At 2-4 days after the first-session of antibiotics administration, pus-like drain discharge turned to be serous with significantly decreased amount. The study group showed shortened postoperative hospital stay comparing to the control group (25.2±4.6 vs. 31.8±5.6 days, p=0.011). In both groups, no patient received radiological or surgical intervention due to PF-associated complications. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study demonstrated that trans-drain administration of antibiotics could be an effective therapeutic option for pancreaticojejunostomy leak-associated infection. Further validation of our result is necessary in large patient populations from multiple centers.