ABSTRACT
Mangoes (Mangifera indica) are widely prized for their abundant nutritional content and variety of beneficial bioactive compounds and are popularly utilized in various foods, pharmaceuticals, and cosmetics industries. However, it is important to note that certain proteins present in mango can trigger various allergic reactions, ranging from mild oral allergy syndrome to severe life-threatening anaphylaxis. The immunoglobulin E-mediated hypersensitivity of mango is mainly associated with three major allergenic proteins: Man i 1 (class IV chitinase), Man i 2 (pathogenesis-related-10 protein; Bet v 1-related protein), and Man i 4 (profilin). Food processing techniques can significantly affect the structure of mango allergens, reducing their potential to cause allergies. However, it is worth mentioning that complete elimination of mango allergen immunoreactivity has not been achieved. The protection of individuals sensitized to mango should be carefully managed through an avoidance diet, immediate medical care, and long-term oral immunotherapy. This review covers various aspects related to mango allergy, including prevalence, pathogenesis, symptoms, and diagnosis. Furthermore, the characterization of mango allergens and their potential cross-reactivity with other fruits, vegetables, plant pollen, and seeds were discussed. The review also highlights the effects of food processing on mango and emphasizes the available strategies for managing mango allergy.
Subject(s)
Food Hypersensitivity , Mangifera , Humans , Allergens/adverse effects , Clinical Relevance , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Food Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Food Hypersensitivity/etiology , PollenABSTRACT
The symptoms of celery allergy are mainly presented as oral allergy symptom, but there are several case reports of patients who experienced anaphylaxis. Defensin (Api g 7), as a novel allergen in celery root, was described in 2022 r. The female patient had a history of several episodes of dyspnea and cough, associated with ingestion of spice mixes containing dried celery. Up to the point of hospitalization, there were no objective tests, either sIgE or skin prick tests, that would confirm celery sensitization. During hospitalization, patient had a positive double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge with cooked celery. The patient was sensitized to mugwort defensin Art v 1. An inhibition assay with celery allergen extract was performed to prove cross-sensitization between Art v 1 and celery allergen responsible for symptoms in the patient. In conclusion, Api g 7 is an important celery allergen that can be responsible for severe reactions. Its cross-reactivity with Art v 1 is characteristic. Negative diagnostic tests with celery do not exclude Api g 7 sensitization.
Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Food Hypersensitivity , Humans , Female , Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Pollen , Plant Proteins/adverse effects , Allergens , Defensins , Skin Tests/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Background: Allergens from Fagales trees frequently cause spring allergy in Europe, North America, and some parts of Asia. The definition of the birch homologous group, which includes birch (Bet v), oak (Que a), alder (Aln g), hazel (Cor a), hornbeam (Car b), beech (Fag s), and chestnut (Cas s), is based on high allergen sequence identity and extensive IgE cross-reactivity. Clinical effect was seen during the alder/hazel, birch, and oak pollen seasons after treatment with tree SLIT-tablets containing only birch allergen extract. Here, we characterize T-cell reactivity with respect to epitope specificities and cross-reactivity toward various Bet v 1 family members, (PR-10/group 1 major allergens). This cross-reactivity may be part of the immunological basis of clinical effect or cross-protection when exposed to birch homologous tree species. Method: T-cell lines were generated from 29 birch-allergic individuals through stimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) with birch/Bet v or oak/Que a allergen extracts. T-cell responses to allergen extracts, purified group 1 allergens, and overlapping 20-mer peptides (Bet v 1, Aln g 1, Cor a 1, and Que a 1) were investigated by T-cell proliferation and cytokine production. Cross-reactivity was evaluated based on Pearson's correlations of response strength and further investigated by flow cytometry using tetramer staining for homologous peptide pairs. Results: T-cell reactivity toward extracts and group 1 allergens from across the birch homologous group was observed for birch/Bet v as well as oak/Que a T-cell lines. T-cell lines responded to multiple Bet v 1 homologous peptides from Aln g 1 and Cor a 1 and a subset of Que a 1 peptides. Significant Pearson's correlations between frequently recognized peptides derived from Bet v 1 and the corresponding peptides derived from alder, hazel, and oak strongly supported the T-cell cross-reactivity toward these allergens. Cross-reactivity between birch and birch homologous peptides was confirmed by pMHCII tetramer staining. Conclusion: T cells from birch tree pollen allergic individuals respond to multiple trees within the birch homologous group in accordance with the level of sequence homology between Bet v 1 family members, (PR-10 allergens) from these allergen sources, confirming the basis for clinical cross-protection.
Subject(s)
Hypersensitivity , Trees , Humans , T-Lymphocytes , Leukocytes, Mononuclear , Antigens, Plant , Pollen , Allergens , Peptides/analysis , BetulaABSTRACT
Cross-reactivity between mammalian proteins, such as that in Pork Cat Syndrome, remains a topic of great interest. This syndrome, characterized by an immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated response to porcine albumin triggered by sensitization through cat epithelium, has been sparsely documented. We discuss a 41-year-old female who developed a pruritic rash within 30 minutes of consuming pork. Notably, she exhibited elevated serum IgE levels with specific reactions to cat dander, dog dander, and pork. A skin prick test for pork was positive. The patient was treated conservatively with allergen avoidance, vitamin D supplementation, fexofenadine, and doxycycline for systemic reactions, and topical corticosteroids for localized skin reactions, yielding a resolution of symptoms. This case underscores the significance of recognizing rare cross-reactivities in allergy and immunology and the manifestations of Pork Cat Syndrome, necessitating a comprehensive patient history and awareness for improved diagnosis and management.
ABSTRACT
Kiwifruit allergy is an emerging pathological condition in both general and pediatric populations with a wide range of symptoms linked to variable molecular patterns, justifying systemic and cross-reactions with other allergens (i.e., latex, pollen, and fruit). Skin prick test (SPT), specific serum IgE (Act d 1, Act d 2, Act d 5, Act d 8, and Act d 10) directed against five out of thirteen molecular allergens described in the literature, and oral test challenge with kiwifruit are available for defining diagnosis. The management is similar to that of other food allergies, mostly based on an elimination diet. Although kiwi allergy has been on the rise in recent years, few studies have evaluated the clinical characteristics and methods of investigating this form of allergy. Data collected so far show severe allergic reaction to be more frequent in children compared to adults. Therefore, the aim of this review is to collect the reported clinical features and the available association with specific molecular patterns of recognition to better understand how to manage these patients and improve daily clinical practice.
Subject(s)
Actinidia , Food Hypersensitivity , Adult , Humans , Child , Immunoglobulin E , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Allergens , Fruit , PollenABSTRACT
The increasing exposure of the population to Cannabis sativa has revealed allergies to different parts of the plant, among which hemp seed. Nonetheless, the major hemp seed allergens remain to be identified. Several known families of allergens are present in hemp seed, including notably seed storage proteins. We therefore aimed to investigate the potential allergenicity of the hemp seed storage proteins and their potential cross-reactivity to different seeds and nuts. For this, we extracted hemp seed proteins sequentially using buffers with increasing levels of salinity (H2O, T2 and T3) to yield extracts differentially enriched in storage proteins. We used these extracts to perform immunoblots and ELISAs using sera of patients either sensitized to hemp seeds or sensitized/allergic to other seeds and nuts. Immunoblots and proteomics analyses identified vicilins and edestins as potential hemp seed allergens. Moreover, ELISA analyses revealed a correlation between sensitization to hazelnut and the hemp seed T3 extract (enriched in storage proteins). The possible cross-reactivity between hazelnut and hemp seed proteins was further strengthened by the results from inhibition ELISAs: the incubation of sera from hazelnut-sensitized individuals with increasing concentrations of the T3 extract inhibited serum IgE binding to the hazelnut extract by about 25-30%. Our study thus identifies vicilins and edestins as potential hemp seed allergens and highlights a possible cross-reactivity with hazelnut. The clinical relevance of this cross-reactivity between hemp seed and hazelnut needs to be further investigated in hazelnut-allergic individuals.
Subject(s)
Cannabis , Corylus , Nut Hypersensitivity , Humans , Allergens , Antigens, Plant , Immunoglobulin E , Seed Storage Proteins , Seeds , Plant ExtractsABSTRACT
Ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) pollen is a major endemic allergen source responsible for severe allergic manifestations in IgE-sensitized allergic patients. It contains the major allergen Amb a 1 and cross-reactive allergen molecules, such as the cytoskeletal protein profilin, Amb a 8 and calcium-binding allergens Amb a 9 and Amb a 10. To assess the importance of Amb a 1, profilin and calcium-binding allergen, the IgE reactivity profiles of clinically well-characterized 150 ragweed pollen-allergic patients were analysed regarding specific IgE levels for Amb a 1 and cross-reactive allergen molecules by quantitative ImmunoCAP measurements, IgE ELISA and by basophil activation experiments. By quantifying allergen-specific IgE levels we found that Amb a 1-specific IgE levels accounted for more than 50% of ragweed pollen-specific IgE in the majority of ragweed pollen-allergic patients. However, approximately 20% of patients were sensitized to profilin and the calcium-binding allergens, Amb a 9 and Amb a 10, respectively. As shown by IgE inhibition experiments, Amb a 8 showed extensive cross-reactivity with profilins from birch (Bet v 2), timothy grass (Phl p 12) and mugwort pollen (Art v 4) and was identified as a highly allergenic molecule by basophil activation testing. Our study indicates that molecular diagnosis performed by the quantification of specific IgE to Amb a 1, Amb a 8, Amb a 9 and Amb a 10 is useful to diagnose genuine sensitization to ragweed pollen and to identify patients who are sensitized to highly cross-reactive allergen molecules present in pollen from unrelated plants, in order to enable precision medicine-based approaches for the treatment and prevention of pollen allergy in areas with complex pollen sensitization.
Subject(s)
Allergens , Hypersensitivity , Humans , Allergens/chemistry , Profilins , Calcium , Plant Proteins , Antigens, Plant , Plant Extracts , Cross Reactions , Immunoglobulin E/metabolism , Ambrosia/metabolismSubject(s)
Cryptomeria , Cupressus , Rhinitis, Allergic , Sublingual Immunotherapy , Humans , Pollen , Rhinitis, Allergic/therapy , Tablets , AllergensABSTRACT
Birch belongs to the order Fagales and the family Betulaceae. Birch pollen is one of the most important airborne inhaled allergens in the north temperate zone, leading to allergic rhinitis, asthma and pollen-related food allergy. The sensitization rate to birch pollen is about 8-16% in the general population and 7-57% in patients seen at various allergy centers. Seven birch pollen allergens have been recognized by the International Allergen Nomenclature Sub-committee, with Bet v 1 as the sole major allergen. Component-resolved diagnostics can help to discriminate broad cross-reactivity and false-positive diagnoses of pollen allergy caused by specific IgE to pan-allergens such as Bet v 2, 4 or Bet v 7 from true birch allergy represented by the major allergen Bet v 1-specific IgE. Patients with allergic symptoms to birch pollen showed significantly higher serum anti-Bet v 1 IgE concentrations than asymptomatic individuals with birch sensitization. A higher level of IgE to Bet v 1 also predicted oral allergy syndrome after the ingestion of Rosaceae fruits, nuts, or Apiaceae vegetables, which have cross-reactive homologous allergens with birch allergens. Bet v 1 is one of the first allergens developed using recombinant technology. Many forms of genetically modified Bet v 1 hypo-allergens have been developed and have shown benefit in animal models or even clinical trials of allergen immunotherapy.
Subject(s)
Allergens , Food Hypersensitivity , Animals , Humans , Betula , Antigens, Plant/genetics , Pollen , Immunoglobulin E , Cross Reactions , Plant Proteins/geneticsABSTRACT
Gly m 4 is the major soybean allergen, causing birch pollen cross allergic reactions. In some cases, Gly m 4-mediated anaphylaxis takes place, but the causative factors are still unknown. Here, we studied the structural and immunologic properties of Gly m 4 to shed light on this phenomenon. We showed that Gly m 4 retained its structure and IgE-binding capacity after heating. Gly m 4 was cleaved slowly under nonoptimal gastric conditions mimicking duodenal digestion, and IgE from the sera of allergic patients interacted with the intact allergen rather than with its proteolytic fragments. Similar peptide clusters of Bet v 1 and Gly m 4 were formed during allergen endolysosomal degradation in vitro, but their sequence identity was insignificant. Animal polyclonal anti-Gly m 4 and anti-Bet v 1 IgG weakly cross-reacted with Bet v 1 and Gly m 4, respectively. Thus, we supposed that not only conserved epitopes elicited cross-reactivity with Bet v 1, but also variable epitopes were present in the Gly m 4 structure. Our data suggests that consumption of moderately processed soybean-based drinks may lead to the neutralizing of gastric pH as a result of which intact Gly m 4 can reach the human intestine and cause IgE-mediated system allergic reactions.
Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Food Hypersensitivity , Animals , Humans , Glycine max/metabolism , Immunoglobulin E , Pollen/metabolism , Allergens , Cross Reactions , Anaphylaxis/etiology , Antigens, Plant , Plant ProteinsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Several studies have reported in vitro cross-reactivity between wheat and barley. However, evidence regarding the clinical cross-reactivity of wheat and barley is limited. This study examined the clinical cross-reactivity of barley and wheat among children with immediate-type wheat allergies. METHODS: We examined the threshold dose of a wheat oral food challenge for wheat-allergic children. We examined the reactivity of barley, and the oral food challenges of barley tea and barley rice were implemented as needed. We measured the specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) levels in wheat, ω-5 gliadin, and barley. RESULTS: We evaluated 53 children (39 [74%] boys) with a median age of 6.6 years. Among them, 39 (74%) patients had a history of anaphylaxis to wheat. The median wheat-, barley-, and ω-5 gliadin-sIgE levels were 57.3, 12.1, and 3.2 kUA /L, respectively. Twelve patients reacted to barley tea (1.8 mg), 14 reacted to barley rice (220-440 mg), and 27 were tolerant to barley tea and barley rice. Barley-allergic patients had significantly higher wheat- and ω-5 gliadin- and barley-sIgE levels and significantly lower threshold doses of wheat than barley-tolerant patients. Omega-5 gliadin-sIgE was the most useful predictor of barley allergy among wheat-allergic patients; the ω-5 gliadin-sIgE 95% positive predictive value for barley allergy was 4.6 kUA /L. CONCLUSIONS: Half of wheat-allergic children reacted to barley. A lower threshold dose of wheat is related to cross-reactive barley allergies. Omega-5 gliadin-sIgE predicts cross-reactive barley allergy in children allergic to wheat. Clinical cross-reactivity to barley should be considered in the management of wheat-allergic children.
Subject(s)
Hordeum , Wheat Hypersensitivity , Child , Male , Humans , Female , Wheat Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Gliadin , Allergens , Immunoglobulin E , TeaABSTRACT
Sensors capable for online continuous monitoring of total sulfonamides in environmental waters are highly desired due to their adverse effects on ecosystem, unexpected concentration fluctuation, and diversity. At present, no sensor with this capability has been reported. In this study, we evaluated the cross reactivity (CR) of the previously reported sulfadimethoxine-binding aptamer using DNase I assay and found that the aptamer was type-specific to sulfonamides. We then fabricated the first type-specific sulfonamide sensor, where the aptamer was immobilized on the optical fiber of the evanescent wave sensor, followed by the surface coating with Tween 80. The competitive binding of sulfonamides and Cy5.5 labeled complementary DNA enabled the low femtomolar to picomolar sensitivity and the detection of total 14 sulfonamides spiked in the lake water. The sensor also exhibited high selectivity, regeneration capability (40 cycles), stability (65 days), and short detection time (5 min). In addition, we found that the CRs were greatly dependent on the buffer composition. By performing the parallel detections in two buffers, the sensors detected 18 out of the 24 sulfonamides with the diversity coverage higher than commercial ELISA kits. Our aptasensor fills the technical gap for continuous monitoring of total sulfonamides in environmental waters.
Subject(s)
Aptamers, Nucleotide , Biosensing Techniques , Optical Fibers , Aptamers, Nucleotide/chemistry , Limit of Detection , Water , Sulfonamides , Sulfadimethoxine , Ecosystem , DNA, Complementary , Polysorbates , Sulfanilamide , Deoxyribonuclease IABSTRACT
Oral allergy syndrome (OAS) is an IgE-mediated immediate food allergy that is localized to the oral mucosa. Pollen food allergy syndrome (PFAS), a pollinosis-associated OAS, is caused by cross-reactivity between food and pollen allergens. However, we need to more precisely understand the underlying pathogenesis of OAS/PFAS. In the present study, we developed a method to comprehensively identify cross-reactive allergens by using murine model of OAS and protein microarray technology. We focused on lip angioedema, which is one of the most common symptoms of OAS, and confirmed that mast cells reside in the tissues inside the lower lip of the mice. Interestingly, when the food allergen ovalbumin (OVA) was injected inside the lower lip of mice with high levels of OVA-specific IgE followed by an intravenous injection of the Evans blue dye, we found immediate dye extravasation in the skin of the neck in a mast cell-dependent manner. In addition, the degree of mast cell degranulation in the oral cavity, reflecting the severity of oral allergic responses, can be estimated by measuring the amount of extravasated dye in the skin. Therefore, we used this model of OAS to examine IgE cross-reactive allergens in vivo. Protein microarray analysis showed that serum IgE from mice intraperitoneally sensitized with ragweed pollen, one of the major pollens causing pollinosis, bound highly to protein extracts from several edible plants including black peppercorn and fennel. We confirmed that the levels of black pepper-specific IgE and fennel-specific IgE were significantly higher in the serum from ragweed pollen-sensitized mice than in the serum from non-sensitized control mice. Importantly, analysis of murine model of OAS showed that the injection of black pepper or fennel extract induced apparent oral allergic responses in ragweed pollen-sensitized mice. These results indicate IgE cross-reactivity of ragweed pollen with black pepper and fennel. In conclusion, we developed mouse model of OAS to identify IgE cross-reactive pollen and food allergens, which will help understand the pathogenesis of OAS/PFAS.
Subject(s)
Fluorocarbons , Foeniculum , Food Hypersensitivity , Piper nigrum , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal , Allergens/analysis , Animals , Antigens, Plant , Disease Models, Animal , Food Hypersensitivity/etiology , Immunoglobulin E , Mice , Plant Extracts , PollenABSTRACT
Synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs) are compounds that mimic the pharmacology of the psychoactive components in cannabis. These compounds are structurally diverse, inexpensive, commercially available, and difficult to identify with modern analytical methods, making them highly accessible for recreational use. Suspected SCRA toxicity, which can present with a breadth of cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and neurological disturbances, is currently addressed through symptom management followed by a toxicological screening that often occurs long after patient discharge. Here, we report the development of four cross-reactive anti-SCRA bioconjugate vaccines as a platform for developing improved diagnostic and therapeutic interventions against SCRA intoxication, using SCRA-resembling small molecule haptens that combine common subregional motifs occurring within and across different generations of SCRA molecules. Using a combination of multiplexed competitive ELISA screening and chemoinformatic analyses, it was found that the antibodies resulting from vaccination with these bioconjugates demonstrated their ability to detect multiple SCRAs with a Tanimoto minimum common structure score of 0.6 or greater, at concentrations below 8 ng/mL. The scope of SCRAs detectable using these haptens was found to include both bioisosteric and non-bioisosteric variants within the core and tail subregions, as well as SCRAs bearing valine-like head subregions, which are not addressed by commercially available ELISA screening approaches. Vaccination with these bioconjugates was also found to prevent the changes in locomotion and body temperature that were induced by a panel of SCRAs at doses of 1 and 3 mg/kg. Further refinement of this genericized hapten design and cross-reactivity-prioritizing approach may enable the rapid detection of otherwise cryptic SCRAs that arise during overdose outbreaks, and could ultimately lead to identification of monoclonal antibody species applicable for overdose reversal.
ABSTRACT
Vaccine safety is measured by the disease protection it confers compared to the harm it may cause; both factors and their relative numbers have been the subject of disagreement. Cross-reactive attack of analogous self-antigens modified by dietary and microbiome factors is one of the poorly explored likely causes of harm. Screening for that and other risk factors might point out those most likely to develop severe vaccine reactions. Cooperation from those with opinions for and against vaccination in data gathering and vetting will lead to greater safety. Screening should include an integrative medical perspective regarding diet, microbiome, leaky gut, and other antigen sources. It might include emerging electronic technology or integrative energetic techniques vetted ultimately by cross-reactive lymphocyte testing or genetic evaluation. The knowledge gained from evaluating those with reactions could enhance the screening process and, since similar antigenic stimuli and reactions are involved, help long COVID sufferers. Centers for early identification and rescue from vaccine reactions could lower morbidity and mortality, and increase the percentage of people choosing to be vaccinated. Additional platforms for boosting; using lower dosage; other routes of administration, such as intranasal or intradermal needles; and possibly different antigens could make it easier to vaccinate globally to address the new variants of viruses rapidly arising.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Some patients with wheat allergy have been reported to show clinical cross-reactivity to barley. However, it is not clear whether the development of barley allergy in patients with wheat allergy is due to cross-antigenicity between wheat and barley. This study aimed to determine the clinical cross-reactivity and immunological cross-antigenicity of wheat and barley. METHODS: The results of barley oral food challenges (OFCs) were compared before and after oral immunotherapy (OIT) for wheat in nine patients with wheat allergy to estimate the clinical cross-reactivity of wheat and barley. Moreover, we performed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) inhibition and immunoblotting inhibition using serum from seven patients allergic to wheat and barley. RESULTS: Nine patients who had positive barley-OFC results performed before OIT for wheat were all negative on barley-OFC performed after OIT. In ELISA inhibition, preincubation of serum from patients allergic to wheat and barley with a high barley extract concentration inhibited binding of IgE to wheat extract by less than 10%. On the other hand, wheat and barley extracts equally inhibited binding to barley sIgE at high concentrations. In the immunoblotting inhibition test, the spots of wheat were inhibited but weakly by barley extracts, and most of the spots of barley were inhibited even by low concentrations of the wheat and barley extract. CONCLUSIONS: We showed that barley allergy associated with wheat allergy is caused by cross-reactivity from wheat. The OIT for wheat is one of the promising options for barley allergy.
Subject(s)
Hordeum , Wheat Hypersensitivity , Allergens , Humans , Immunoglobulin E , Plant ExtractsABSTRACT
Oak pollen allergy is common all over the world and an important cause of pollinosis. The molecular properties of some component allergens have been clearly characterized, while some of them are still waiting for characterization. Studies on some oak component allergens are neglected, possibly because of its high cross-reactivity to birch. However, the utilization of culprit allergen molecules is expected to increase the diagnostic sensitivity and efficacy of immunotherapy. Sensitization to oak pollen along with birch often causes pollen food allergy syndrome to fruits and vegetables. Acorn and wood dust from oak can cause allergic disease. We summarize the distribution and taxonomic classification of oak trees of allergenic importance. Molecular characteristics of the identified component allergens, cross-reactivity, and clinical aspects for diagnosis and immunotherapy are also described with an emphasis on Korean situations.
Subject(s)
Food Hypersensitivity , Quercus , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal , Humans , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/complications , Pollen , Immunoglobulin E , Allergens , Cross Reactions , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Republic of Korea/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Summary: Background.Based on the cross-reactivity between pollen lipid transfer proteins (LTPs) and the peach LTP, Pru p 3, it has been suggested that the pollen might initiate the LTP sensitization process. Objective. To establish whether LTP allergy can be considered as a pollen-food syndrome. Methods. The literature was reviewed and new data of component-resolved diagnosis from Italy obtained by both ISAC immunoassay and ImmunoCAP on large populations of LTP hypersensitive patients were provided and analyzed. Results. Among Pru p 3 reactors, patients positive for Art v 3 and Pla a 3 largely exceeded those sensitized to the respective major pollen allergens, Art v 1 and Pla a 1/Pla a 2. Pru p 3 reactivity remained stable around 80-90% at all ages, whereas Art v 3 and Ole e 7 recognition was missing in younger patients. Pru p 3 IgE exceeded IgE specific for pollen LTP at all ages. Inhibition studies carried out on LTP reactors showed that commercial extracts of mugwort and plane pollen were unable to inhibit significantly Pru p 3 IgE reactivity. In follow-up studies, baseline Pru p 3 IgE levels exceeded Art v 3 IgE levels in 84% of those sensitized to both allergens, and all patients positive to only one LTP allergen at baseline were sensitized to Pru p 3. Further, most of the patients who did not show any LTP reactivity at baseline became exclusive Pru p 3 reactors. On ImmunoCAP singleplex Pru p 3 IgE levels exceeded Art v 3 IgE levels in 89% of cases (p less than 0.0001). Most literature data were in keeping with these new observations. Conclusions. The evidence for LTP syndrome being a pollen-food syndrome is presently very thin. Our data do not rule out the possible sensitization to the protein, via the airways or the skin.
Subject(s)
Antigens, Plant , Food Hypersensitivity , Allergens , Carrier Proteins , Cross Reactions , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Humans , Immunoglobulin E , Plant Proteins , Pollen , SyndromeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Given the increased popularity of flaxseed in meals, several cases of allergy to these seeds have been reported. Little is known about the allergens implicated in hypersensitivity reactions to flaxseed. The present study aimed to identify the allergens involved in IgE-mediated reactions in 5 patients with a clinical history of severe systemic symptoms after flaxseed consumption. METHODS: Proteins that were potential allergens with IgE-binding capacity were purified from flaxseed extract using chromatography and identified via MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Immunoassays were performed using the 5 allergic patients' sera tested individually and as a pool. RESULTS: Immunoblotting of the flaxseed extract revealed a low-molecular-mass protein (around 13 kDa) in 4 of the 5 patients, while a protein of approximately 55 kDa was detected in 2 patients. The proteins were identified by mass spectrometry as flaxseed 2S albumin, which is included in the WHO/IUIS allergen nomenclature as Lin u 1, and 11S globulin. Inhibition assays revealed in vitro IgE-mediated cross-reactivity between Lin u 1 and peanut and cashew nut proteins, while IgE-mediated recognition of 11S globulin by patients' sera was partially inhibited by several plant-derived sources. CONCLUSIONS: Seed storage proteins from flaxseed were involved in the development of severe symptoms in the 5 patients studied and exhibited cross-reactivity with other allergenic sources. Besides the severity of flaxseed allergy in patients sensitized to 2S albumin, this is the first time that 11S globulin has been identified as a potential allergen. Taking these data into account should ensure a more accurate diagnosis.
Subject(s)
Flax , Globulins , Nut Hypersensitivity , Nut Proteins , Albumins , Allergens/adverse effects , Amino Acid Sequence , Antigens, Plant , Cross Reactions , Flax/adverse effects , Humans , Immunoglobulin E/metabolism , Plant Extracts , Plant Proteins/adverse effects , Seed Storage Proteins/metabolismABSTRACT
Background: According to recent findings, mugwort and birch pollen-allergic patients represent a high-risk group for developing adverse allergic reactions to herbal spices due to cross-reacting allergens found in both pollen and raw herbs. Such associations are known as a pollen-plant food allergy syndrome. Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the extent of sensitization to commonly consumed herb species representing Lamiaceae, Apiaceae and Brassicaceae families in Polish patients with suspected birch, mugwort or grass pollen allergy. Materials and Methods: Data were obtained from 180 patients, adults and children with suspected allergy to aeroallergens. Skin prick tests (SPT) were performed with standard birch, mugwort, grass mixture or dust mite extracts. Prick by prick tests were performed with fresh extracts of popular herbs: basil, oregano, lemon balm, mint, salvia, rosemary, thyme, anise, caraway and mustard. Results: Twenty-nine percent of patients were characterized by concomitant positive skin prick reactions to both herbs and pollens extracts. The concomitant pollinosis significantly increased the risk of SPT reaction to all tested herbs in adults (odds ratio, OR = 2.15−7.35) and children (OR = 5.3−28). The extent of SPT responses to herbs from Lamiaceae + Apiaceae were strongly correlated with SPT responses to pollens in the pediatric group (r = 0.685/p < 0.001). Conclusion: The study demonstrates that youngsters suffering from pollinosis are at high risk of developing allergic reactions to herbs and highlights the importance of including native skin prick tests with herbs in the diagnostic work-up for suspected food allergy.