Low-Energy Dense Potato- and Bean-Based Diets Reduce Body Weight and Insulin Resistance: A Randomized, Feeding, Equivalence Trial.

We evaluated the effect of diets low in energy density (1 kcal/g) and high in either potatoes (Potato) or pulses (Bean) on blood glucose control in participants with insulin resistance. We hypothesized that the Potato and Bean diets would have equivalent effects. This was an 8-week randomized, parallel design, controlled feeding study comparing Potato and Bean diets (50-55% carbohydrate, 30-35% fat, 15-20% protein). Equivalence was prespecified as the mean change in the blood glucose concentration for Potato that was within ±20% of the Bean diet. Thirty-six participants (age: 18-60 years, body mass index: 25-40 kg/m2) with insulin resistance (homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance [HOMA-IR] >2) were enrolled. Body weight was measured, and subjects underwent a mixed meal tolerance test at baseline and after 8 weeks. Intent-to-treat (ITT) and completer analyses were conducted. Equivalence between the two diets in the area under the curve for serum glucose was attained within ±10%, but the reduction from baseline was not statistically significant. For the Bean diet, insulin (area under the response curve: -2136.3 ± 955.5 mg/[dL∙min], P = .03) and HOMA-IR (-1.4 ± 0.6, P = .02) were lower compared with baseline. ITT and completer analyses were similar, except that HOMA-IR was also reduced by the Potato diet (-1.3 ± 0.6, P < .05). Compliance with the diets was 87-88%, and body weight was reduced in both diets (Potato: -5.6% ± 0.6%; Bean: -4.1% ± 0.6%, P < .001) with no significant difference between the two diets. Potato and Bean diets low in energy density were equally effective in reducing insulin resistance and promoting weight loss in individuals with impaired blood glucose control. Clinical Trial: The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04203238.

Effects of acute arginine supplementation on neuroendocrine, metabolic, cardiovascular, and mood outcomes in younger men: A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: Arginine is an amino-acid supplement and precursor for nitric-oxide synthesis, which affects various biologic processes. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of arginine supplementation on growth hormone (GH) and metabolic parameters. METHODS: Thirty physically active, healthy men (age 18-39 y; body mass index: 18.5-25 kg/m2) were randomized in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Arginine (10 g) and placebo (0 g) beverages were consumed after an overnight fast. Blood samples were collected at baseline and 1.5, 3.0, and 24 h after supplementation. The primary outcomes were serum GH and metabolomics. Also, amino acids, glucose, insulin, triacylglycerols, thyroid hormones, testosterone, cortisol, dehydroepiandrosterone, and mood state were assessed. Individuals with detectable increases in GH were analyzed separately (responders: n = 16; < 0.05 ng/mL at 1.5 h). Repeated-measure analyses of variance estimated the treatment effects at each timepoint. RESULTS: Arginine levels increased at 1.5 h (146%) and 3.0 h (95%; P ≤ 0.001) and GH (193%) and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH; 10%) levels at 24 h (P < 0.05) after arginine versus placebo consumption. Arginine versus placebo increased glucose levels at 1.5 h (5%) and 3.0 h (3%; P ≤ 0.001). Arginine versus placebo did not affect other dependent measures, including mood state (P > 0.05), but changes in the urea, glutamate, and citric-acid pathways were observed. Among responders, arginine versus placebo increased GH at 1.5 h (37%), glucose at 1.5 h (4%) and 3.0 h (4%), and TSH at 24 h (9%; P < 0.05). Responders had higher levels of benzoate metabolites at baseline and 1.5 h, and an unknown compound (X-16124) at baseline, 1.5 h, and 24 h that corresponds to a class of gut microbes (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Arginine supplementation modestly increased GH, glucose, and TSH levels in younger men. Responders had higher benzoate metabolites and an unknown analyte attributed to the gut microbiome. Future studies should examine whether the increased prevalence of these gut microorganisms corresponds with GH response after arginine supplementation.

Resistant Starch Has No Effect on Appetite and Food Intake in Individuals with Prediabetes.

BACKGROUND: Type 2 resistant starch (RS2) has been shown to improve metabolic health outcomes and may increase satiety and suppress appetite and food intake in humans. OBJECTIVE: This study assessed whether 12 weeks of daily RS2 supplementation could influence appetite perception, food intake, and appetite-related gut hormones in adults with prediabetes, relative to the control (CTL) group. DESIGN: The study was a randomized controlled trial and analysis of secondary study end points. PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: Sixty-eight adults (body mass index ≥27) aged 35 to 75 years with prediabetes were enrolled in the study at Pennington Biomedical Research Center (2012 to 2016). Fifty-nine subjects were included in the analysis. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomized to consume 45 g/day of high-amylose maize (RS2) or an isocaloric amount of the rapidly digestible starch amylopectin (CTL) for 12 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Subjective appetite measures were assessed via visual analogue scale and the Eating Inventory; appetite-related gut hormones (glucagon-like peptide 1, peptide YY, and ghrelin) were measured during a standard mixed-meal test; and energy and macronutrient intake were assessed by a laboratory food intake (buffet) test, the Remote Food Photography Method, and SmartIntake app. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Data were analyzed using linear mixed models, adjusting for treatment group and time as fixed effects, with a significance level of α=.05. RESULTS: RS2 had no effect on subjective measures of appetite, as assessed by visual analogue scale (P>0.05) and the Eating Inventory (P≥0.24), relative to the CTL group. There were no effects of RS2 supplementation on appetite-related gut hormones, including glucagon-like peptide 1 (P=0.61), peptide YY (P=0.34), and both total (P=0.26) and active (P=0.47) ghrelin compared with the CTL. RS2 had no effect on total energy (P=0.30), carbohydrate (P=0.11), protein (P=0.64), or fat (P=0.37) consumption in response to a buffet meal test, relative to the CTL. In addition, total energy (P=0.40), carbohydrate (P=0.15), protein (P=0.46), and fat (P=0.53) intake, as quantified by the Remote Food Photography Method, were also unaffected by RS2, relative to the CTL. CONCLUSIONS: RS2 supplementation did not increase satiety or reduce appetite and food intake in adults with prediabetes.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of naringenin: A randomized, controlled, single-ascending-dose clinical trial.

AIMS: To evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of naringenin in healthy adults consuming whole-orange (Citrus sinensis) extract. METHODS AND METHODS: In a single-ascending-dose randomized crossover trial, 18 adults ingested doses of 150 mg (NAR150), 300 mg (NAR300), 600 mg (NAR600) and 900 mg (NAR900) naringenin or placebo. Each dose or placebo was followed by a wash-out period of at least 1 week. Blood safety markers were evaluated pre-dose and 24 hours post-dose. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded. Serum naringenin concentrations were measured before and over 24 hours following ingestion of placebo, NAR150 and NAR600. Four- and 24-hour serum measurements were obtained after placebo, NAR300 and NAR900 ingestion. Data were analysed using a mixed-effects linear model. RESULTS: There were no relevant AEs or changes in blood safety markers following ingestion of any of the naringenin doses. The pharmacokinetic variables were: maximal concentration: 15.76 ± 7.88 µM (NAR150) and 48.45 ± 7.88 µM (NAR600); time to peak: 3.17 ± 0.74 hours (NAR150) and 2.41 ± 0.74 hours (NAR600); area under the 24-hour concentration-time curve: 67.61 ± 24.36 µM × h (NAR150) and 199.05 ± 24.36 µM × h (NAR600); and apparent oral clearance: 10.21 ± 2.34 L/h (NAR150) and 13.70 ± 2.34 L/h (NAR600). Naringenin half-life was 3.0 hours (NAR150) and 2.65 hours (NAR600). After NAR300 ingestion, serum concentrations were 10.67 ± 5.74 µM (4 hours) and 0.35 ± 0.30 µM (24 hours). After NAR900 ingestion, serum concentrations were 43.11 ± 5.26 µM (4 hours) and 0.24 ± 0.30 µM (24 hours). CONCLUSIONS: Ingestion of 150 to 900 mg doses of naringenin is safe in healthy adults, and serum concentrations are proportional to the dose administered. Since naringenin (8 µM) is effective in primary human adipocytes, ingestion of 300 mg naringenin twice/d will likely elicit a physiological effect.

Effects of testosterone supplementation on body composition and lower-body muscle function during severe exercise- and diet-induced energy deficit: A proof-of-concept, single centre, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Severe energy deficits during military operations, produced by significant increases in exercise and limited dietary intake, result in conditions that degrade lean body mass and lower-body muscle function, which may be mediated by concomitant reductions in circulating testosterone. METHODS: We conducted a three-phase, proof-of-concept, single centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (CinicalTrials.gov, NCT02734238) of non-obese men: 14-d run-in, free-living, eucaloric diet phase; 28-d live-in, 55% exercise- and diet-induced energy deficit phase with (200 mg testosterone enanthate per week, Testosterone, n = 24) or without (Placebo, n = 26) exogenous testosterone; and 14-d recovery, free-living, ad libitum diet phase. Body composition was the primary end point; secondary endpoints included lower-body muscle function and health-related biomarkers. FINDINGS: Following energy deficit, lean body mass increased in Testosterone and remained stable in Placebo, such that lean body mass significantly differed between groups [mean difference between groups (95% CI), 2.5 kg (3.3, 1.6); P < .0001]. Fat mass decreased similarly in both treatment groups [0.2 (-0.4, 0.7), P = 1]. Change in lean body mass was associated with change in total testosterone (r = 0.71, P < .0001). Supplemental testosterone had no effect on lower-body muscle function or health-related biomarkers. INTERPRETATION: Findings suggest that supplemental testosterone may increase lean body mass during short-term severe energy deficit in non-obese, young men, but it does not appear to attenuate lower-body functional decline. FUNDING: Collaborative Research to Optimize Warfighter Nutrition projects I and II, Joint Program Committee-5, funded by the US Department of Defence.

A qualitative assessment of health behaviors and experiences during menopause: A cross-sectional, observational study.

OBJECTIVES: A qualitative research study was performed to assess the health and lifestyle behaviors of middle-aged women during the menopause transition, as well as to inform the development of interventions designed to combat menopause symptoms and improve quality of life during and after menopause. STUDY DESIGN: Data were collected from 1611 women via a 21-item questionnaire distributed electronically. Only women who self-reported age ≥40 years and who were either peri-menopausal or post-menopausal were included in the analyses. OUTCOME MEASURES: Women responded to questions about their health behaviors and experiences during menopause, including use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT), symptom ratings, and use of diet/lifestyle, exercise, and holistic remedies to relieve menopause symptoms. RESULTS: More than 80% of women were interested in a structured lifestyle program to alleviate menopause symptoms, with 72% of these women wanting targeted strategies for weight loss or weight maintenance. Insomnia and hot flashes were the most severe symptoms reported. Although HRT is a well-established treatment of menopausal symptoms, more than 60% of women denied use of HRT, stating that they 'never considered HRT' as a treatment option or 'preferred to not take HRT'. Most women (65%) did not feel prepared for menopause. CONCLUSIONS: Women do not feel prepared for menopause and report interest in a structured lifestyle program containing weight-loss and weight-maintenance strategies to combat menopause symptoms.

Step Tracking with Goals Increases Children's Weight Loss in Behavioral Intervention.

BACKGROUND: This study examined the influence of step goals with pedometers to improve children's weight loss, physical activity, and psychosocial health during obesity treatment. METHODS: Overweight and obese children ages 8-17 years (n = 105) participated in a 10-week family-based weight management intervention, including physical activity, nutrition, and behavioral modification. A quasi-experimental design was used to group eight cohorts into three conditions: no pedometer (n = 24), pedometer only (n = 25), and pedometer with step goals (i.e., 500 steps/day weekly increase above baseline; n = 56). Height and weight were measured at baseline and week 10 and used to calculate BMI. Analysis of covariance was performed to examine difference by condition for change in weight, BMI, and BMI z-score, controlling for age and baseline value. Differences in steps per day and psychosocial health were compared between the two pedometer conditions. RESULTS: Participants were 12.4 ± 2.5 years of age, including 70% girls and 64% African Americans. The pedometer with goals condition significantly reduced BMI (p = 0.02) and BMI z-score (p = 0.01) compared with the no-pedometer group. The pedometer with goals condition significantly increased steps per day (+1185 ± 425 steps/day) compared with the pedometer-only condition (-162 ± 620 steps/day; p < 0.05). Both pedometer groups similarly increased in subjective health and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Providing children with pedometers and individualized step goals was an effective approach to produce weight loss. Further work is needed to increase the strength of interventions to achieve clinically meaningful weight reduction for children with obesity.