Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 126: 105029, 2021 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34455009

RESUMEN

In drug development, nonclinical safety assessment is pivotal for human risk assessment and support of clinical development. Selecting the relevant/appropriate animal species for toxicity testing increases the likelihood of detecting potential effects in humans, and although recent regulatory guidelines state the need to justify or dis-qualify animal species for toxicity testing, individual companies have developed decision-processes most appropriate for their molecules, experience and 3Rs policies. These generally revolve around similarity of metabolic profiles between toxicology species/humans and relevant pharmacological activity in at least one species for New Chemical Entities (NCEs), whilst for large molecules (biologics) the key aspect is similarity/presence of the intended human target epitope. To explore current industry practice, a questionnaire was developed to capture relevant information around process, documentation and tools/factors used for species selection. Collated results from 14 companies (Contract Research Organisations and pharmaceutical companies) are presented, along with some case-examples or over-riding principles from individual companies. As the process and justification of species selection is expected to be a topic for continued emphasis, this information could be adapted towards a harmonized approach or best practice for industry consideration.


Asunto(s)
Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos/métodos , Industria Farmacéutica/métodos , Modelos Animales , Pruebas de Toxicidad/métodos , Productos Biológicos/toxicidad , Industria Farmacéutica/normas , Especificidad de la Especie , Pruebas de Toxicidad/normas
2.
PLoS One ; 15(6): e0233910, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32502215

RESUMEN

Farmers face difficulties in redeeming their investment in larger litter sizes since this comes with larger litter heterogenicity, lower litter resilience and risk of higher mortality. Dietary oligosaccharides, given to the sow, proved beneficial for the offspring's performance. However, giving oligosaccharides to the suckling piglet is poorly explored. Therefore, this field trial studied the effect of dietary short-chain fructo-oligosaccharides (scFOS; 1g/day; drenched) supplementation to low (LBW, lower quartile), normal (NBW, two intermediate quartiles) and high (HBW, upper quartile) birth weight piglets from birth until 7 or 21 days of age. Performance parameters, gut microbiome and short-chain fatty acids profile of feces and digesta were assessed at birth (d 0), d 7, weaning (d 21.5) and 2 weeks post-weaning (d 36.5). Additional parameters reflecting gut health (intestinal integrity and morphology, mucosal immune system) were analysed at d 36.5. Most parameters changed with age or differed with the piglet's birth weight. Drenching with scFOS increased body weight by 1 kg in NBW suckling piglets and reduced the post-weaning mortality rate by a 100%. No clear difference in the IgG level, the microbiota composition and fermentative activity between the treatment groups was observed. Additionnally, intestinal integrity, determined by measuring intestinal permeability and regenerative capacity, was similar between the treatment groups. Also, intestinal architecture (villus lenght, crypt depth) was not affected by scFOS supplementation. The density of intra-epithelial lymphocytes and the expression profiles (real-time qPCR) for immune system-related genes (IL-10, IL-1ß, IL-6, TNFα and IFNγ) were used to assess mucosal immunity. Only IFNγ expression, was upregulated in piglets that received scFOS for 7 days. The improved body weight and the reduced post-weaning mortality seen in piglets supplemented with scFOS support the view that scFOS positively impact piglet's health and resilience. However, the modes of action for these effects are not yet fully elucidated and its potential to improve other performance parameters needs further investigation.


Asunto(s)
Alimentación Animal , Crianza de Animales Domésticos/métodos , Suplementos Dietéticos , Oligosacáridos/administración & dosificación , Sus scrofa/fisiología , Fenómenos Fisiológicos Nutricionales de los Animales/inmunología , Animales , Animales Lactantes/fisiología , Peso Corporal/fisiología , Heces/microbiología , Femenino , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/inmunología , Inmunidad Mucosa , Mucosa Intestinal/inmunología , Mucosa Intestinal/microbiología , Sus scrofa/microbiología , Destete
3.
Environ Toxicol Chem ; 38(3): 533-547, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30569562

RESUMEN

Fish (embryo) toxicity test guidelines are mostly based on aquatic exposures. However, in some cases, other exposure routes can be more practical and relevant. Micro-injection into the yolk of fish embryos could offer a particular advantage for administering hydrophobic compounds, such as many endocrine disruptors. Single-dose micro-injection was compared with continuous aquatic exposure in terms of compound accumulation and biological responses. 17α-Ethinyl estradiol (EE2) was used as a model compound. First, the optimal solvent and droplet size were optimized, and needle variation was assessed. Next, biological endpoints were evaluated. The accumulated internal dose of EE2 decreased over time in both exposure scenarios. Estrogen receptor activation was concentration/injected dose dependent, increased daily, and was related to esr2b transcription. Transcription of vitellogenin 1 (vtg1) and brain aromatase (cyp19a1b) was induced in both scenarios, but the cyp19a1b transcription pattern differed between routes. Injection caused an increase in cyp19a1b transcripts from 48 hours post fertilization (hpf) onward, whereas after aquatic exposure the main increase occurred between 96 and 120 hpf. Some malformations only occurred after injection, whereas others were present for both scenarios. We conclude that responses can differ between exposure routes and therefore micro-injection is not a direct substitute for, but can be complementary to aquatic exposure. Nevertheless, vtg1and cyp19a1b transcription and estrogen receptor activation are suitable biomarkers for endocrine disruptor screening in both scenarios. Environ Toxicol Chem 2019;38:533-547. © 2018 SETAC.


Asunto(s)
Disruptores Endocrinos/administración & dosificación , Pruebas de Toxicidad/métodos , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua/administración & dosificación , Animales , Aromatasa/genética , Aromatasa/metabolismo , Embrión no Mamífero/efectos de los fármacos , Disruptores Endocrinos/toxicidad , Etinilestradiol/administración & dosificación , Etinilestradiol/toxicidad , Masculino , Microinyecciones/métodos , Receptores de Estrógenos/metabolismo , Vitelogeninas/genética , Vitelogeninas/metabolismo , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua/toxicidad , Pez Cebra/embriología , Pez Cebra/metabolismo , Proteínas de Pez Cebra/genética , Proteínas de Pez Cebra/metabolismo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA