Delafloxacin for the treatment of adult patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia.

INTRODUCTION: Delafloxacin is a novel fluoroquinolone with peculiar characteristics such as a weak acid character, frequent in vitro activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and a low potential for resistance selection compared with other fluoroquinolones. AREAS COVERED: The present narrative review summarizes the available data on the use of delafloxacin for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). EXPERT OPINION: Delafloxacin is a novel fluoroquinolone with a unique profile and some interesting characteristics for the treatment of CABP, such as its marked activity against gram-positive bacteria, including MRSA, the possible use as monotherapy (owing to anti-Gram-negative and anti-atypical bacteria activity), the retained activity against many Gram-positive organisms resistant to other fluoroquinolones, and the availability of both oral and intravenous formulations. The results of the DEFINE-CABP phase-3 randomized controlled trial have shown noninferiority of delafloxacin vs. moxifloxacin for the treatment of CABP, thereby providing a further option for this indication. Against this background, future post-marketing experiences remain of crucial importance for further refining the place in therapy of delafloxacin in the real-life management algorithms of CABP, either as first-line option or step-down/outpatient treatment.

Delafloxacin--A novel fluoroquinolone for the treatment of ciprofloxacin-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in patients with cystic fibrosis.

INTRODUCTION: Fluoroquinolone antibiotics, namely ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin, play an important role in treating infection in cystic fibrosis (CF) and ciprofloxacin remains the last widely used and orally available antipseudomonal agent. Recently, a new fluoroquinolone, delafloxacin, has been approved by the FDA for the indication of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI). This antibiotic is a novel dual-targeting anionic fluoroquinolone and differs from previous agents in its class, as it lacks a protonatable substituent. To date, there are no reports of its use or activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in CF. Alarmingly, fluoroquinolone resistance is increasing among CF P aeruginosa isolates. The aims of the study were to (a) examine in vitro susceptibility of delafloxacin against a population of P. aeruginosa (n = 52) isolated from adult CF patients at our CF centre, (b) to compare delafloxacin and ciprofloxacin in vitro susceptibilities against CF P. aeruginosa and (c) to evaluate where delafloxacin may add benefit in treating CF P aeruginosa. METHODS: In vitro susceptibilities were examined on 52 non-mucoid P. aeruginosa and P. aeruginosa ATCC™ 27853 reference strain, by employing Etest® gradient test strips for delafloxacin (range:0.002 - 32 mg/L) and ciprofloxacin (0.002 - 32 mg/L), as per manufacturer's instructions (Biomerieux). RESULTS: MIC range, MIC50 and MIC90 for delafloxacin were 0.064 â†’ 32 mg/L, 0.56 mg/L and 2.19 mg/L, respectively. For ciprofloxacin, these were 0.047 â†’ 32 mg/L, 1.69 mg/L and 8.0 mg/L, respectively. Overall, isolates were statistically more sensitive to delafloxacin (p = 0.0005) than ciprofloxacin. Of note, 4/12 (33.3%) isolates with intermediate resistance to ciprofloxacin were sensitive to delafloxacin. Similarly, 10/28 (35.7%) isolates resistant to ciprofloxacin were sensitive to delafloxacin, with only 17.9% isolates resistant to ciprofloxacin, resistant to delafloxacin. CONCLUSION: Given similar breakpoints of these fluoroquinolones, these data show that delafloxacin has greater activity than ciprofloxacin. While delafloxacin and ciprofloxacin were equally effective with sensitive isolates, the value of delafloxacin was noted with more resistant isolates to ciprofloxacin. While ciprofloxacin should remain the first line fluoroquinolone for treating CF P aeruginosa, delafloxacin shows potential in treating ciprofloxacin-resistant P aeruginosa.

Delafloxacin against Helicobacter pylori, a potential option for improving eradication success?

Increase in Helicobacter pylori resistance to fluoroquinolones has been reported in many countries. The aim of the study was to compare, for the first time to our knowledge, levofloxacin and delafloxacin activities against H. pylori, including numerous levofloxacin- and multidrug resistant strains. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of six antibiotics against 71 consecutive clinical strains were determined. Delafloxacin MIC50 and MIC90 were 0.016 and 0.125 µg/mL versus 0.125 and ≥32 µg/mL, respectively, for levofloxacin. Against the 19 levofloxacin resistant strains, delafloxacin MICs50 and MICs90 were 0.094 and 0.38 µg/mL, respectively. Delafloxacin MICs against the 21 strains with double or multidrug resistance were ≤0.75 µg/mL. The low MICs, the activity against levofloxacin resistant and multidrug resistant H. pylori strains and the increased activity of the agent in acidic conditions make delafloxacin worthy of further investigation, aiming at optimizing fluoroquinolone-based eradication regimens.

Efficacy of Delafloxacin versus Moxifloxacin against Bacterial Respiratory Pathogens in Adults with Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (CABP): Microbiology Results from the Delafloxacin Phase 3 CABP Trial.

Delafloxacin is a novel fluoroquinolone with activity against Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and atypical pathogens, including fluoroquinolone-nonsusceptible methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The microbiological results of a phase 3 clinical trial in adults with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) comparing delafloxacin (300 mg intravenously [i.v.] with the option to switch to 450 mg orally every 12 h) to moxifloxacin (400 mg i.v. with the option to switch to 400 mg orally once a day [QD]) were determined. Patients from 4 continents, predominately Europe but also South America and Asia, were enrolled. The microbiological intent-to-treat (MITT) population included 520 patients, and 60.5% of these patients had a bacterial pathogen identified. Multiple diagnostic methods were employed, including culture, serology, PCR, and urinary antigen tests. Based on baseline MIC90 values, delafloxacin exhibited at least 16-fold greater activity than moxifloxacin for Gram-positive and fastidious Gram-negative pathogens. Delafloxacin retained activity against resistant phenotypes found in Streptococcus pneumoniae (penicillin-, macrolide-, and multiple-drug resistant), Haemophilus species (ß-lactamase producing and macrolide nonsusceptible), and S. aureus (MRSA and fluoroquinolone-nonsusceptible methicillin-susceptible S. aureus [MSSA]). The microbiological success rates were 92.7% for S. pneumoniae (87.5% for penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae [PRSP]), 92.6% for S. aureus (100% for MRSA), 100% for Escherichia coli, 82.4% for Klebsiella pneumoniae, 100% for Klebsiella oxytoca, 100% for Moraxella catarrhalis, 91.7% for Haemophilus influenzae, 88.6% for Haemophilus parainfluenzae, 96.7% for Mycoplasma pneumoniae, 93.1% for Legionella pneumophila, and 100% for Chlamydia pneumoniae There was little correlation between MICs and outcomes, with a high proportion of favorable outcomes observed across all delafloxacin baseline MIC values. Delafloxacin may be considered a treatment option as monotherapy for CAP in adults, where broad-spectrum coverage including MRSA activity is desirable.

Activity of Potential Alternative Treatment Agents for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Isolates Nonsusceptible to Levofloxacin and/or Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole.

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is difficult to treat due to the production of multiple intrinsic and acquired mechanisms of resistance. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) and the fluoroquinolones have traditionally been considered the drugs of choice but are plagued by increasing resistance and adverse drug effects. The objective of this study was to evaluate the in vitro activities of 12 clinically relevant antimicrobials against clinical S. maltophilia isolates nonsusceptible to levofloxacin and/or TMP-SMZ. A diverse panel of 41 clinical S. maltophilia isolates collected through the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program from 2008 to 2018 was evaluated against ceftazidime, ceftazidime-avibactam, chloramphenicol, delafloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, eravacycline, minocycline, omadacycline, polymyxin B, and tigecycline. MICs were determined in triplicate via reference broth microdilution and interpreted according to CLSI guidelines where available. MIC distributions and susceptibilities were also compared across infection type, acquisition setting, and geographic origin. Susceptibilities to levofloxacin and TMP-SMZ were 29.3% and 36.6%, respectively. Minocycline displayed the highest susceptibility rate overall (92.7%) and the lowest MIC90 value (4 mg/liter) of any of the 12 agents tested. Only 3 isolates were resistant to levofloxacin, TMP-SMZ, and minocycline. Polymyxin B and tigecycline were the second most active agents. No significant differences were observed in MIC distributions across the 3 strata evaluated. These data demonstrate that few antimicrobials, old or new, maintain reliable activity against resistant S. maltophilia The role of minocycline in the treatment of infections due to S. maltophilia warrants further clinical investigation given its potent in vitro activity and favorable adverse effect profile.

In Vivo Pharmacodynamic Target Determination for Delafloxacin against Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the Neutropenic Murine Pneumonia Model.

Delafloxacin is a broad-spectrum anionic fluoroquinolone that has completed a phase 3 study for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. We investigated the pharmacodynamic target for delafloxacin against 12 Klebsiella pneumoniae and 5 Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains in the neutropenic murine lung infection model. The median 24-h free-drug area under the curve (fAUC)/MIC values associated with net stasis and 1-log kill were 28.6 and 64.1 for K. pneumoniae, respectively. The 24-h fAUC/MIC values associated with net stasis and 1-log kill for P. aeruginosa were 5.66 and 14.3, respectively.

Comparative In Vitro Activities of New Antibiotics for the Treatment of Skin Infections.

Bacterial skin infections result in significant morbidity and have contributed to enhanced health-care resource utilization. The problem is heightened by emerging antimicrobial resistance. Multiple novel agents active against resistant pathogens that cause skin infections-including dalbavancin, tedizolid phosphate, oritavancin, and delafloxacin-have been approved over the past 5 years. Common features of these agents include gram-positive activity and favorable safety. Of these agents, delafloxacin is unique in being active against both gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens that cause skin infections, including those resistant to other antimicrobial agents. It is, therefore, an effective option for the treatment of skin infections.

Delafloxacin: A New Anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Fluoroquinolone.

Delafloxacin (ABT 492) is a new fluoroquinolone available in both oral and parenteral formulations. It has recently been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the management of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. When compared to combination therapy of vancomycin and aztreonam, delafloxacin was not inferior and had a favorable adverse event profile. Furthermore, its anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) activity and favorable clinical response in MRSA infections distinguishes it from other fluoroquinolones. This review focuses on the mode of action, antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, clinical indications, and safety profile of this drug. Considerations for formulary addition and its place in therapy are also discussed.

Clinical and pharmacokinetic drug evaluation of delafloxacin for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections.

INTRODUCTION: In the era of multi-drug resistant pathogens, the adequate treatment of skin and skin structure infections remains a challenge for clinicians. Delafloxacin, with its broad spectrum against Gram-positive, Gram-negative and anaerobic organisms, represents a new therapeutic option in this setting, especially when coverage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is required in the empirical or targeted approach. Areas covered: In this drug evaluation, the Authors have reviewed the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of delafloxacin. In addition, recent data on clinical efficacy and safety from clinical trials have been included. Expert opinion: Delafloxacin represents an attractive therapeutic option due to a broad antimicrobial and favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile. Several in vitro studies have demonstrated the low potential for resistance selection if used in empirical regimens. Delafloxacin is a promising candidate for the treatment of Gram-positive infections, especially if co-infection with other pathogens is suspected. This is because of the very low MIC of the agent for Gram-positive (including MRSA) and anaerobic bacteria and because of the wide spectrum of activity against Gram-negative organisms. For these interesting microbiological and PK/PD characteristics we expect future uses of this drug in other indications such as diabetic foot infection, osteomyelitis, prosthetic joint infections, abdominal infections and central nervous system infections.