Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Otol Neurotol ; 36(8): 1349-56, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26171672

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Cochlear implantation (CI) is a common intervention for severe-to-profound hearing loss in high-income countries, but is not commonly available to children in low resource environments. Owing in part to the device costs, CI has been assumed to be less economical than deaf education for low resource countries. The purpose of this study is to compare the cost effectiveness of the two interventions for children with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) in a model using disability adjusted life years (DALYs). METHODS: Cost estimates were derived from published data, expert opinion, and known costs of services in Nicaragua. Individual costs and lifetime DALY estimates with a 3% discounting rate were applied to both two interventions. Sensitivity analysis was implemented to evaluate the effect on the discounted cost of five key components: implant cost, audiology salary, speech therapy salary, number of children implanted per year, and device failure probability. RESULTS: The costs per DALY averted are $5,898 and $5,529 for CI and deaf education, respectively. Using standards set by the WHO, both interventions are cost effective. Sensitivity analysis shows that when all costs set to maximum estimates, CI is still cost effective. CONCLUSION: Using a conservative DALY analysis, both CI and deaf education are cost-effective treatment alternatives for severe-to-profound SNHL. CI intervention costs are not only influenced by the initial surgery and device costs but also by rehabilitation costs and the lifetime maintenance, device replacement, and battery costs. The major CI cost differences in this low resource setting were increased initial training and infrastructure costs, but lower medical personnel and surgery costs.


Asunto(s)
Implantación Coclear/economía , Implantes Cocleares/economía , Sordera/economía , Sordera/terapia , Educación/economía , Audiología/economía , Preescolar , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Sordera/rehabilitación , Falla de Equipo/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Pérdida Auditiva Sensorineural/economía , Pérdida Auditiva Sensorineural/terapia , Humanos , Lactante , Nicaragua/epidemiología , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Logopedia/economía , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
La Paz; UNICEF; 1997. 23 p. tab.
Monografía en Español | LILACS, LIBOCS, LIBOSP | ID: lil-331855

RESUMEN

La subsecretaria de Educacion Alternativa,con el apoyo de UNICEF,ha definido lineas programaticas de accion en el marco de la construccion de politicas publicas,en relacion al apoyo a la alfabetizacion y educacion basica de jovenes y adultos,mismas que contemplan el objetivo de contribuir a la reduccion del 42 por ciento de la tasa actual de analfabetismo absoluto en los departamentos de La Paz,Oruro,Cochabamba,Santa Cruz,Beni y Pando,atendiendo con prioridad a la poblacion femenina,indigena y rural.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Mujeres , Educación/economía , Educación/estadística & datos numéricos , Educación/métodos , Educación , Bolivia
7.
Med Decis Making ; 15(1): 13-24, 1995.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7898292

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: No consensus exists regarding the preferred treatment of childhood lead poisoning. The authors used decision analysis to compare the clinical impacts and cost-effectiveness of four management strategies for childhood lead poisoning, and to investigate how effective chelation therapy must be in reducing neuropsychologic sequelae to warrant its use. METHODS: The model was based on a 2-year-old child with moderate lead poisoning [blood lead level 1.21 to 1.88 mumol/L (25 to 39 micrograms/dL)]. The following strategies were compared: 1) no treatment; 2) EDTA provocation testing, followed by chelation if testing is positive (PROV); 3) penicillamine chelation with crossover to EDTA provocation testing if toxicity occurs (PCA); 4) EDTA provocation testing with crossover to penicillamine chelation if testing is negative (EDTA). RESULTS: The EDTA and PCA strategies prevented 22.5% of the cases of reading disability and resulted in an increase of 1.02 quality-adjusted life years compared with no treatment. When the costs of outpatient EDTA testing and chelation are considered, the EDTA strategy is more cost-effective than the PCA strategy; when inpatient costs are considered, the PCA strategy becomes more cost-effective. When costs of remedial education are considered, all strategies are cost-saving compared with no treatment if chelation reduces the risk of lead-induced reading disability by more than 20%. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment strategies for childhood lead poisoning vary in clinical impact, cost, and cost-effectiveness. Chelation of the 1.4% of United States preschoolers whose blood lead levels are 2.21 mumol/L (25 micrograms/dL) or higher could prevent more than 45,000 cases of reading disability, and save more than $900 million per year in overall costs when the costs of remedial education are considered.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Quelación/economía , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Ácido Edético/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Intoxicación por Plomo/economía , Intoxicación por Plomo/terapia , Terapia Asistida por Computador , Terapia por Quelación/efectos adversos , Preescolar , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Árboles de Decisión , Dislexia Adquirida/economía , Dislexia Adquirida/etiología , Dislexia Adquirida/rehabilitación , Ácido Edético/uso terapéutico , Educación/economía , Humanos , Intoxicación por Plomo/complicaciones , Intoxicación por Plomo/diagnóstico , Modelos Económicos , Oportunidad Relativa , Penicilamina/efectos adversos , Penicilamina/economía , Penicilamina/uso terapéutico , Calidad de Vida , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA