Synthesis of gemifloxacin conjugated silver nanoparticles, their amplified bacterial efficacy against human pathogen and their morphological study via TEM analysis.

Drug-loaded nanoparticles (NPs) allow specific accumulation and controlled release of drugs to infected tissues with minimal cytotoxicity. In this study, gemifloxacin conjugated silver nanoparticles (Gemi-AgNPs) were synthesized, and the amplification of their antibacterial potential against the human pathogen as well as their stability was monitored under physiological conditions. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis demonstrated the interaction between -NH2 and -OH functional moiety and the metal surface. The morphological analyses via transmission electron microscopy revealed that Gemi-AgNPs has a round oval shape and average particle size of 22.23 ± 2 nm. The antibacterial and antibiofilm activities of these NPS showed that Gemi-AgNPs exhibit excellent antimicrobial and biofilm inhibition activity against human pathogens, namely, Proteus mirabilis (P. mirabilis) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). A significant increase in the antibiofilm activity of Gemi-AgNPs was confirmed by crystal violet, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) staining, and microscopic analysis. Gemi-AgNPs exhibited the ability to inhibit urease with an IC50 value of 57.4 ± 0.72 µg/mL. The changes in the bacterial cell morphology were analyzed via TEM, which revealed that cell membranes disrupted and completely destroyed the cell morphology by the treatment of Gemi-AgNPs.

Identify old drugs as selective bacterial ß-GUS inhibitors by structural-based virtual screening and bio-evaluations.

Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a cytotoxic drug that has wide applicability and usage in cancer treatment. Despite its success, patients suffer dose-dependent diarrhea, limiting the drug's efficacy. No effective therapy is available for this unmet medical need. The bacterial ß-glucuronidase (ß-GUS) plays pivotal role in CPT-11-induced diarrhea (CID) via activating the non-toxic SN-38G to toxic SN-38 inside intestine. By using structural-based virtual screening, three old drugs (N-Desmethylclozapine, Aspartame, and Gemifloxacin) were firstly identified as selective bacterial ß-GUS inhibitors. The IC50 values of the compounds in the enzyme-based and cell-based assays range from 0.0389 to 3.6040 and 0.0105 to 5.3730 µM, respectively. The compounds also showed good selectivity against mammalian ß-GUS and no significant cytotoxicity in bacteria. Molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations were performed to further investigate the binding modes of compounds with bacterial ß-GUS. Binding free energy decomposition revealed that the compounds formed strong interactions with E413 in catalytic trail from primary monomer and F365' on the bacterial loop from the other monomer of bacterial ß-GUS, explaining the selectivity against mammalian ß-GUS. The old drugs identified here may be used as bacterial ß-GUS inhibitors for CID or other bacterial ß-GUS-related disorders.

Ciprofloxacin-induced immune-mediated thrombocytopenia: No cross-reactivity with gemifloxacin.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Fluoroquinolone-induced immune-mediated thrombocytopenia is uncommon, and no reports of cross-reactivity among fluoroquinolones exist. Here, we describe a case of ciprofloxacin-induced immune thrombocytopenia with no cross-reactivity with gemifloxacin. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 77-year-old woman showed profound thrombocytopenia immediately after two ciprofloxacin injections for pneumonia. Platelet counts recovered rapidly after ciprofloxacin discontinuation. She had experienced thrombocytopenia after ciprofloxacin administration 4 years earlier, which was assumed to be ciprofloxacin-induced immune-related. Interestingly, no thrombocytopenia occurred following the subsequent exposure to another fluoroquinolone, gemifloxacin. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: No cross-reactivity occurred between ciprofloxacin and gemifloxacin in this fluoroquinolone-induced immune thrombocytopenia case.

Efficacy of gemifloxacin for the treatment of experimental Staphylococcus aureus keratitis.

PURPOSE: The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of topically applied gemifloxacin for the treatment of experimental Staphylococcus aureus keratitis in a rabbit model. METHODS: Rabbit corneas were intrastromally injected with ~100 colony-forming units (CFU) of S. aureus ATCC25923. Eight hours (early treatment) or 16 h (late treatment) after the injection, 1 topical drop of balanced salt solution (BSS), gemifloxacin ophthalmic solution (0.5%), levofloxacin ophthalmic solution (0.5%), or gatifloxacin eye gel (0.3%) was applied to each eye every 15 min for 5 doses and then, every 30 min for 14 doses. The eyes were examined both before and after treatment. The corneas were harvested from treated and untreated rabbits for the quantitation of bacteria and histological observation. RESULTS: In the early-treatment groups, all 3 fluoroquinolones significantly lowered the clinical severity of infection and the median erosion area of the cornea compared with the BSS control (P=0.000). In the late-treatment groups, gemifloxacin and levofloxacin did not cause a significant reduction in clinical scores compared with the BSS control (P=0.107 and 0.531, respectively), but the gatifloxacin caused a significant reduction in clinical scores compared with the BSS control (P=0.011). The median erosion area significantly decreased with treatment with gemifloxacin, gatifloxacin, and levofloxacin in both early- and late-treatment groups, when compared with the control group (P≤0.022). In the early-treatment groups, the gemifloxacin, gatifloxacin, and levofloxacin groups had significantly lower CFU recovered from the corneas compared with the control group (P<0.01), while in the late-treatment groups, levofloxacin failed to reduce the CFU recovered from the corneas compared with the control group (P=0.695). The minimal inhibitory concentrations for gemifloxacin, gatifloxacin, and levofloxacin against S. aureus ATCC25923 were 0.0625, 0.0625, and 0.125 mg/L, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Gemifloxacin, similar to gatifloxacin and levofloxacin, can significantly lower the clinical severity and CFU per cornea observed in S. aureus keratitis when early treatment is implemented. Significantly, gemifloxacin showed a significant efficacy improvement in reducing the bacterial load recovered from the corneas in the late-treatment experiment.

Fluoroquinolones in the management of community-acquired pneumonia in primary care.

A literature search was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of the respiratory fluoroquinolones (gemifloxacin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin) and their efficacy and safety in the management of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Data show that CAP is a common presentation in primary care practice, and is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality, particularly in the elderly. Although the causative pathogens differ depending on treatment setting and patient factors, Streptococcus pneumoniae is the primary pathogen in all treatment settings. As a class, the respiratory fluoroquinolones have a very favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile. Pharmacodynamic criteria suggest that moxifloxacin and gemifloxacin are more potent against S. pneumoniae, which may have the added benefit of reducing resistance selection and enhancing bacterial eradication. The respiratory fluoroquinolones are also generally well tolerated, and are first-line options for outpatient treatment of CAP in patients with comorbidities or previous antibiotic use.

Gemifloxacin use in the treatment of acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.

The newest generation of fluoroquinolones have proven efficacy against bacterial organisms associated with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB). Gemifloxacin, as one of the quinolones in this class, exhibits many of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of the class with a few notable differences. Against Streptococccus pneumoniae it has a lower minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) than the other respiratory fluoroquinolones and it has activity against both bacterial DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV. The increased activity of gemifloxacin against both enzymes may be associated with decreased rates of resistance. Clinically, gemifloxacin has been shown to have positive effects on length of hospitalization and increased success at long-term follow-up in AECB patients. These associations were observed in noninferiority comparison studies. Although an advantage with the use of gemifloxacin in AECB is suggested, there are no comparison data is available to conclude that gemifloxacin is superior to the other respiratory fluoroquinolones. Gemifloxacin is generally well tolerated, but is associated with a characteristic rash and gastrointestinal upset as its most common observed side effects.

[Study of efficacy of modern fluoroquinolones against agent of glanders in experiments in vivo].

AIM: Efficacy of modern fluoroquinolones for urgent prophylaxis and treatment of experimental glanders was studied. In experiments on laboratory animals in vivo, it was shown that sparfloxacin, gemifloxacin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin were highly effective for urgent prophylaxis and treatment of glanders. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Golden hamsters of both sexes, with weight 80 - 100 g, were inoculated with 100 LD50 of 48-hour agar culture of Burkholderia mallei (strain ts-5). Commercial preparations of 2 - 4th generations of fluoroquinolones: sparfloxacin (Sparflo, India), gemifloxacin (Faktiv, Russia), moxifloxacin (Avelox, Germany), pefloxacin (Abactal, Slovenia), levofloxacin (Eleflox, India), lomefloxacin (Lomeflox, India), ofloxacin (Russia). Urgent prophylaxis started 3 hours after inoculation with duration of 10 days, whereas treatment started 24 hours after inoculation with duration of 15 days. Daily dose of pefloxacin, ciprofloxacin, of loxacin was divided on 2 parts, which were administered with 12-hour interval; other drugswere administered once a day. RESULTS: All studied drugs, excluding lomefloxacin, were highly effective for urgent prophylaxis and treatment of experimental glanders and provided 80 - 100% protection. CONCLUSION: Third-fourth generations of fluoroquinolones: sparfloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, gemifloxacin were highly effective against agent of glanders in in vivo experiments. They are promising drugs for the development of schemes for urgent prophylaxis and treatment of glanders in humans.

Short-course therapy of gemifloxacin effective against pneumococcal pneumonia in mice.

Standard 7-14 day (d) courses of antimicrobial therapy for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) are thought to have contributed to the emergence of resistant pneumoccoci. Consequently, short-course fluoroquinolone regimens have been proposed to minimize resistance. To test this, we examined 2-day versus 5-day regimens of gemifloxacin and levofloxacin for treatment of pneumonia in a murine model. In doing so, we also investigated whether the enhanced potency of gemifloxacin would influence outcomes. CD1 Swiss mice were infected intratracheally with 10(5)-CFU of a virulent Streptococcus pneumoniae strain. Drugs were administered every 8 h for 2 d and 5 d, starting at 24 h postinfection. Temperature was used to assess disease progression. Gemifloxacin remained effective for 2 d and 5 d, with survival rates of 100%-83% compared with 40%-58% for levofloxacin. Eighty-nine to 100% of gemifloxacin-treated mice were clear of pulmonary bacteria compared with only 0%-20% for levofloxacin. For levofloxacin-treated mice, 2 of 7 (29%) isolates with a levofloxacin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) 4 times that of the infecting parent strain had ParC mutations. By contrast, no isolates recovered from gemifloxacin-treated mice were reduced in susceptibility. Gemifloxacin could be effective in shortening duration of therapy for CAP treatment as well as minimize resistance development.

In vivo activity of gemifloxacin, moxifloxacin and levofloxacin against pneumococci with gyrA and parC point mutations in a sepsis mouse model measured with the all or nothing mortality end-point.

A dose-decreasing immunocompetent sepsis mouse model was used to evaluate the in vivo effect of levofloxacin, moxifloxacin and gemifloxacin, using a ciprofloxacin/levofloxacin susceptible serotype 6B strain (ciprofloxacin MIC: 1 mg/l) and two resistant serotype 14 and 19F strains with gyrA and parC point mutations (ciprofloxacin MICs of 32 and 64 mg/l, respectively). Significant higher in vivo activity was found for moxifloxacin and gemifloxacin than for levofloxacin against strains 1 and 2, and for gemifloxacin versus moxifloxacin or levofloxacin against strain 3. Gemifloxacin treatment resulted in 100% survival against strains 1 and 2(AUC0-24 h/MIC of 30 and 62) but against strain 3, survival was 60-80% (AUC0-24 h/MIC of 93). Similar AUC0-24 h/MIC values produced different therapeutic results suggesting that in vitro parameters other than the MIC could influence efficacy predictions based on in vitro susceptibility tests (MICs) or pharmacodynamic parameters (AUC0-24 h/MIC).

Gemifloxacin once daily for 7 days compared to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid thrice daily for 10 days for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia of suspected pneumococcal origin.

CONTEXT: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is common among adults and contributes considerably to morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of gemifloxacin to high-dose amoxicillin/clavulanate for the treatment of CAP of suspected pneumococcal origin. DESIGN: Randomized, multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group Phase III study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: From September 1998 to July 1999, 324 patients with CAP were randomized at 102 centers in France, Poland and the Republic of South Africa. INTERVENTION: Patients were double-blind randomized to receive either oral gemifloxacin 320 mg once daily for 7 days or oral amoxicillin/clavulanate 1 g/125 mg three times daily for 10 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures were clinical, bacteriological, and radiological responses at the end of therapy (day 12-14) and follow-up (day 24-30) visits. RESULTS: In 228 PP patients, clinical resolution at follow-up was 88.7% for 7-day gemifloxacin and 87.6% for 10-day amoxicillin/clavulanate [95% CI, -7.3, 9.5]. In 249 PP patients, clinical resolution at end of therapy was 95.3% for 7-day gemifloxacin vs. 90.1% for 10-day amoxicillin/clavulanate [95% CI, -1.2, 11.7]. Bacteriologic response rates for the PP patients at end of therapy were 96.3% for 7-day gemifloxacin and 91.8% for the amoxicillin/clavulanate group [95% CI, -4.7, 13.6]. Bacteriologic response rates at follow-up were 87.2% for 7-day gemifloxacin and 89.1% for the amoxicillin/clavulanate group [95% CI, -15.0, 11.2]. Specifically gemifloxacin eradicated 95.7% of Streptococcus pneumoniae including penicillin and macrolide resistant strains. Radiological response rates for the PP patients at end of therapy were 89.1% for 7-day gemifloxacin and 87.6% for the amoxicillin/clavulanate group. The most frequently reported drug-related events were in the gemifloxacin group, diarrhea (6.0%) and rash (3.0%) and in the amoxicillin/clavulanate group, diarrhea (11.1%) and fungal infection, vaginitis and vomiting (each 2.0%). Overall there were statistically fewer withdrawals due to lack of therapeutic effect in the gemifloxacin group compared with the amoxicillin/clavulanate cohort, (95% CI, -8.8;0.6; P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Gemifloxacin 320 mg once daily for 7 days was found to be clinically, bacteriologically, and radiologically as effective as 10 days of amoxicillin/clavulanate 1 g/125 mg three times daily for the treatment of suspected pneumococcal CAP.

Gemifloxacin: a new fluoroquinolone approved for treatment of respiratory infections.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the microbiology, pharmacokinetic parameters, drug interactions, and results of the available clinical trials of gemifloxacin for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB). DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (1966-September 2003) was searched for primary and review articles. Data from the manufacturer were also included. Key words included adverse effects, clinical trials, drug interactions, gemifloxacin, and pharmacokinetic parameters. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All articles and product labeling concerning gemifloxacin, a fluoroquinolone antibiotic recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of CAP and AECB, were included for review. DATA SYNTHESIS: Compared with currently available fluoroquinolones, gemifloxacin demonstrated improved in vitro activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae (minimum inhibitory concentration for 90% eradication 0.03 microg/mL) and similar activity against gram-negative respiratory pathogens (Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis) and atypical pathogens such as Chlamydia pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Gemifloxacin, consistent with other available fluoroquinolones, has insufficient activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus to allow clinical use for such infections. Gemifloxacin has adequate bioavailability and a favorable drug interaction profile. Gemifloxacin was comparable to commonly employed nonfluoroquinolone regimens for treatment of CAP and AECB, although the studies were designed to demonstrate equivalence. Gemifloxacin once daily for 5-7 days was well tolerated in controlled and uncontrolled clinical studies. Available clinical data, however, are insufficient to draw clinical or toxicologic distinctions between gemifloxacin and other fluoroquinolones. CONCLUSIONS: Gemifloxacin may be a suitable choice for empiric treatment of CAP or AECB. However, due to the significant history of fluoroquinolone-induced hepatic failure and dermatologic complications, the use of this drug should be closely monitored.

Monotherapy versus dual therapy for community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized patients.

Several medical-specialty professional societies have suggested that combination therapy with a beta -lactam plus a macrolide or doxycycline or monotherapy with a "respiratory quinolone" (i.e., levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, or gemifloxacin) are optimal first-line therapy for patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia. These recommendations are based predominantly on retrospective studies that suggest improved rates of morbidity and mortality and hospital length of stay among patients treated in such a fashion. Well-designed, prospective, randomized studies confirming this tenet of therapy have not been published, although numerous prospective studies have provided indirect confirmation. The biological rationale for such a differential response (i.e., favoring combination therapy or fluoroquinolone therapy) includes the immunomodulatory effects of macrolides or more-optimal treatment of primary infection or coinfection with atypical pathogens. Well-designed, prospective, randomized trials are required to best define the effectiveness of combination therapy with a beta -lactam plus macrolide or doxycycline or with a respiratory quinolone in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

Gemifloxacin: a new fluoroquinolone.

Gemifloxacin is a dual targeted fluoroquinolone with potent in vitro activity against Gram-positive, -negative and atypical human pathogens--pathogens considered to be important causes of community-acquired respiratory tract infections. Gemifloxacin demonstrates impressive minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC 90 ) values against clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Chlamydia pneumoniae and Legionella spp., with MIC 90 values reported to be 0.016-0.06, < 0.0008-0.06, 0.008-0.3, 0.25, 0.125 and 0.016-0.07 microg/ml, respectively. Gemifloxacin is also active in vitro against a broad range of Gram-negative bacilli with MIC 90 values against the Enterobacteriaceae in the range of 0.016 to > 16 microg/ml ( Escherichia coli and Providencia stuartii, respectively), with the majority of the genus having MIC 90 drug concentrations < 0.5 microg/ml. The in vitro activity of gemifloxacin against anaerobic organisms is variable. The MIC values for gemifloxacin are not affected by beta-lactamase production nor by penicillin or macrolide resistance in S. pneumoniae. Gemifloxacin is approved by the FDA to be clinically efficacious against multi-drug resistant S. pneumoniae. The pharmacokinetics of gemifloxacin are such that the drug can be administered orally once-daily to yield or achieve sustainable drug concentrations exceeding the MIC values of clinically important organisms. Gemifloxacin has been shown to target both DNA gyrase (preferred target) and topoisomerase IV (secondary target) - enzymes critical for DNA replication and organism survival - against clinical isolates of S. pneumoniae. This dual targeting activity is thought to be important for reducing the likelihood for selecting for quinolone resistance. Gemifloxacin has been investigated and approved for therapy in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. In one study, more patients receiving gemifloxacin compared to clarithromycin remained free of exacerbations for longer periods of time (p < 0.016) and gemifloxacin had a shorter time to eradication of H. influenzae than did clarithromycin (p < 0.02). From efficacy studies, gemifloxacin was found to have an adverse profile that was comparable with other compounds. The most frequent side effects were diarrhoea, abdominal pain and headache. Gemifloxacin is a welcomed addition to currently available agents for the treatment of community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections. Other potential indications appear to be within the spectrum of this compound.

In vitro activity of gemifloxacin against recent clinical isolates of bacteria in Korea.

Gemifloxacin is an enhanced-affinity fluoroquinolone with broad-spectrum antibacterial activity. In Korea, resistant bacteria are relatively more prevalent than in other industrialized countries. In this study, we studied the in vitro activities of gemifloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and other commonly used antimicrobial agents against 1,689 bacterial strains isolated at four Korean university hospitals during 1999-2000. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using the agar dilution method of National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Gemifloxacin had the lowest MICs for the respiratory pathogens: 90% of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Haemophilus influenzae were inhibited by 0.06, 0.03, and 0.03 mg/L, respectively. Gemifloxacin was more active than the other fluoroquinolones against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci, streptococci, and Enterococcus faecalis. The MIC90s of gemifloxacin for Klebsiella oxytoca, Proteus vulgaris, and non-typhoidal Salmonella spp. were 0.25, 1.0, and 0.12 mg/L, respectively, while those for other Gram-negative bacilli were 4-64 mg/L. In conclusion, gemifloxacin was the most active among the comparative agents against Gram-positive species, including respiratory pathogens isolated in Korea.

Intra-abdominal anaerobic infections: bacteriology and therapeutic potential of newer antimicrobial carbapenem, fluoroquinolone, and desfluoroquinolone therapeutic agents.

Intra-abdominal infections are biphasic, synergistic processes with early peritonitis and bacteremia due to aerobes and a later abscess component due to anaerobes. Although Bacteroides fragilis is the most commonly recognized pathogen, other anaerobes, including other members of the B. fragilis-group species, are major components of infection. Anaerobic bacteremia is often associated with an intra-abdominal source. New antimicrobial agents with anaerobic activity are in various stages of development for the therapy of intra-abdominal infections. The in vitro activity and the currently available sparse clinical data are reviewed for a new carbapenem (ertapenem), several fluoroquinolones (trovafloxacin, moxifloxacin, and gemifloxacin), and a desfluoroquinolone (BMS-284756).

Gemifloxacin is efficacious against penicillin-resistant and quinolone-resistant pneumococci in experimental meningitis.

In experimental rabbit meningitis, gemifloxacin penetrated inflamed meninges well (22 to 33%) and produced excellent bactericidal activity (change in log(10) [Deltalog(10)] CFU/ml/h, -0.68 +/- 0.30 [mean and standard deviation]), even superior to that of the standard regimen of ceftriaxone plus vancomycin (-0.49 +/- 0.09 deltalog(10) CFU/ml/h), in the treatment of meningitis due to a penicillin-resistant pneumococcal strain (MIC, 4 mg/liter). Even against a penicillin- and quinolone-resistant strain, gemifloxacin showed good bactericidal activity (-0.48 +/- 0.16 deltalog(10) CFU/ml/h). The excellent antibacterial activity of gemifloxacin was also confirmed by time-kill assays over 8 h in vitro.

[Third and fourth generation fluoroquinolones]. / Les fluoroquinolones de troisième et quatrième générations.

Levofloxacin, levorotatory isomer of ofloxacine, is the only FQ3G on the belgian market since the middle of 2000 and is a little more efficient than the FQ2G against S. pneumoniae. The FQ4G are in vitro active against the common and atypic respiratory pathogenes and significantly more efficient against the Gram positive cocci, principally against S. pneumoniae. Their long duration of action allows one oral administration a day sufficient to obtain bactericidal levels in the serum. Their secondary effects are located principally at the level of digestive tract, neurologic system or cutaneous area. In the U.S.A., several FQ4G (clina-, grepa-, spar-, trova-floxacin) were withdrawn from use after observance of severe toxicity, while there were being administrated on a large scale. Furthermore, two of these "respiratory" FQ4G (gemi- and moxi-floxacin) should reinforced our therapeutic armoury, moxifloxacin as of 2002 and gemifloxacin as of 2004. The position of FQ3G and 4G are in discussion. In the case of pneumonia acquired in the community and confirmed by X-Ray, our recommendation is to administer a new FQ at the first choice if the patient is allergic to penicillin, debilitated or if a penicillin resistant S. pneumoniae suspected (epidemiology, recent antibiotherapy) and at the second choice if it is resistance to penicillin or to macrolide, in case of atypic pneumonia. Today, the majority of the pneumonia acquired outside the hospital is empirically treated with a betalactam (oral or intravenous), with or without macrolide. The new FQ are important drugs. One must avoid overprescription which leads to bacterial resistance (especially S. pneumoniae).

Pharmacodynamics to combat resistance.

The ability to identify agents with the optimal combination of potency, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics should help to maximize bacteriological cure and thus minimize the potential for selection and spread of resistance. Gemifloxacin demonstrated excellent correlation between efficacy and the AUC0-24h/MIC ratio whereas there was little correlation with time above MIC. Thus, gemifloxacin is similar to other quinolones in that it is the amount of drug present, not the frequency of administration, that determines antibacterial effect. In a neutropenic murine thigh model of infection, caused by Gram-negative bacilli, a AUC0-24h/MIC ratio of approximately 100 was necessary to protect >90% of the animals, which is similar to data reported previously for other quinolones. However, in order to achieve the same protection in an immunocompetent murine infection caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae, the AUC-24h/MIC ratio was approximately 25. The magnitude of this AUC0-24h/MIC ratio did not alter for strains exhibiting penicillin or macrolide resistance. Importantly, when gemifloxacin was examined against strains of S. pneumoniae with well-characterized ciprofloxacin resistance (including mutations in gyrase, parC and parE as well as efflux strains) there was little impact on the in vivo efficacy. Overall, the data showed a trend towards a decrease in the AUC0-24h/MIC ratio for these more resistant strains. The lower AUC0-24h/MIC ratio was especially noticeable for the efflux mutants suggesting that the quinolone efflux mechanism may be down-regulated in vivo and may be of minimal relevance to the clinical activity of gemifloxacin against S. pneumoniae. The efficacy of gemifloxacin, in comparison with other oral agents used to treat respiratory infections, has also been evaluated in a rat model using doses, and therefore AUC0-24h/MIC ratios, that approximate those in man. These data confirm the excellent activity of gemifloxacin against strains of Haemophilus influenzae and S. pneumoniae, including those demonstrating penicillin, macrolide and quinolone resistance.

Gemifloxacin versus amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. The 070 Clinical Study group.

Six hundred patients were evaluated in this randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter, parallel-group study comparing the efficacy and safety of gemifloxacin (320 mg once-daily for 5 days) and amoxicillin/clavulanate (500/125 mg three-times daily for 7 days) for the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB). Of note, more than 90% of study participants had stage 2 disease at study entry. The two drugs were found to be equally effective, with clinical success rates of 93.6% for gemifloxacin and 93.2% on amoxicillin/clavulanate (95% CI -3.9 to 4.6). Bacteriological success rates favored gemifloxacin (90.9% compared with 79.5% for amoxicillin/clavulanate; 95% CI -3.3 to 26.0); however, this difference was not statistically significant. Gemifloxacin and amoxicillin/clavulanate were both well tolerated. In summary, gemifloxacin was found to be well tolerated and effective for the treatment of AECB, suggesting it is well suited for empirical treatment of this common respiratory condition in the current clinical environment.

Gemifloxacin is effective in experimental pneumococcal meningitis.

In a rabbit model of Streptococcus pneumoniae meningitis, 5 mg of gemifloxacin mesylate (SB-265805) per kg/h reduced the bacterial titers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) almost as rapidly as 10 mg of ceftriaxone per kg/h (Deltalog CFU/ml/h +/- standard deviation [SD], -0.25 +/- 0.09 versus -0.38 +/- 0.11; serum and CSF concentrations of gemifloxacin were 2.1 +/- 1.4 mg/liter and 0.59 +/- 0.38 mg/liter, respectively, at 24 h). Coadministration of 1 mg of dexamethasone per kg did not affect gemifloxacin serum and CSF levels (2.7 +/- 1.4 mg/liter and 0.75 +/- 0.34 mg/liter, respectively, at 24 h) or activity (Deltalog CFU/ml/h +/- SD, -0.26 +/- 0.11).