The Complications of Corticosteroid for Patients with Community-acquired Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reported the complications of corticosteroids for patients with community-acquired pneumonia with inconsistent results. An explicit systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in this study to evaluate the complications of corticosteroids for patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Methods: Using PubMed, Embase, the Global Index Medicus of the World Health Organization (WHO), the WHO clinical trial registry, and Clinicaltrials.gov, a thorough literature search of RCTs was carried out. Inclusion criteria included RCTs comparing the use of any kind of a specified corticosteroid with the placebo control group. The complications were analyzed, including gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, healthcare-associated infection (HAI), acute kidney injury (AKI), hospital readmission, hyperglycemia, neuropsychiatric complications, and adverse cardiac events. Results: The result can be concluded that the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, healthcare-associated infection (HAI), acute kidney injury (AKI), hospital readmission, neuropsychiatric complications, and adverse cardiac events between the intervention and control groups were not significantly different. However, corticosteroids can increase the risk of hyperglycemia as compared to the control group who did not receive corticosteroids (RR= 1.72, 95 % CI: 1.38-2.14, P < .01). In the subgroup analysis, the meta-analysis showed a significant difference in the risk of hyperglycemia between the prednisolone and control groups (RR= 1.81, 95 % CI: 1.29-2.54, P < .01). There is no heterogeneity between studies (I2= 0%). The subgroup difference was not significant (P = .11). Conclusions: Through our analysis, the use of corticosteroids can increase the risk of hyperglycemia for patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Further studies are required to be conducted to confirm the findings due to limited clinical trials.

Role of vitamin C in treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in adult patients requiring hospitalisation: a systematic review protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a leading cause of hospitalisation and is associated with a high mortality. Vitamin C is a powerful antioxidant and has been used in treatment of infections; however, its role as an adjunctive treatment in CAP is unclear. This review aims to assess the efficacy and safety of vitamin C in adults who require hospitalisation for CAP. METHODS AND ANALYSES: Searches will be conducted from inception to November 2023 on Ovid MEDLINE Daily and MEDLINE, Embase CINAHL, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov databases with the aid of a medical librarian. We will include data from randomised controlled trials reporting vitamin C supplementation in patients with CAP requiring hospitalisation. Two independent reviewers will select studies, extract data and will assess the risk of bias by use of the Risk of Bias tool. The overall certainty of evidence will be assessed by use of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework. Random-effects meta-analyses will be conducted, and effect measures will be reported as relative risks with 95% CIs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No previous ethical approval is required for this review. The findings of this review will be submitted to a scientific journal and presented at an international medical conference. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: 483860.

Target attainment of intravenous lefamulin for treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections.

OBJECTIVES: Lefamulin is a pleuromutilin antibiotic approved for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). Its spectrum of activity, good penetration into soft tissues and low rates of cross-resistance also make lefamulin a potentially valuable option for treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs). A Phase 2 trial of lefamulin for ABSSSI indicated similar efficacy of 100 and 150 mg q12h IV dosing regimens. In the present study, the potential of lefamulin for this indication was further evaluated from a translational pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic perspective. METHODS: PTA was determined for various dosages using Monte Carlo simulations of a population pharmacokinetic model of lefamulin in ABSSSI patients and preclinical exposure targets associated with bacteriostasis and a 1-log reduction in bacterial count. Overall target attainment against MSSA and MRSA was calculated using lefamulin MIC distributions. RESULTS: Overall attainment of the bacteriostasis target was 94% against MSSA and 84% against MRSA for the IV dosage approved for CABP (150 mg q12h). Using the same target, for the 100 mg q12h regimen, overall target attainment dropped to 68% against MSSA and 50% against MRSA. Using the 1-log reduction target, overall target attainment for both regimens was <40%. CONCLUSIONS: Lefamulin at the currently approved IV dosage covers most Staphylococcus aureus isolates when targeting drug exposure associated with bacteriostasis, suggesting potential of lefamulin for the treatment of ABSSSIs. Lefamulin may not be appropriate in ABSSSI when rapid bactericidal activity is warranted.

Literature Highlights.

Literature Highlights is a digest of notable papers recently published in the leading respiratory journals, allowing our readers to stay up-to-date with research advances. Coverage in this issue includes Vitamin D supplementation to prevent TB infection; network models of TB dynamics through enhanced data collection linked to active case-finding; hydrocortisone use for severe community-acquired pneumonia; and low-cost air quality sensors and individual exposure levels.

The pharmacokinetic evaluation of omadacycline (Oral Only Dosing Regimen) for the treatment of Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (CABP).

INTRODUCTION: Omadacycline is a new analog of the tetracycline class active against atypical bacteria, as well as against staphylococci, including methicillin-resistant strains, and Streptococcus pneumoniae. AREAS COVERED: This review has summarized the available clinical evidence on the use of oral omadacycline in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and described the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameters in healthy and special populations and the latest research on omadacycline. EXPERT OPINION: The available clinical evidence on oral omadacycline for the treatment of CAP shows that its properties provide reliable empirical coverage for pathogens such as Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and species of Legionella, Chlamydia, and Mycoplasma. Omadacycline is also active against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA); penicillin-resistant and multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes, and Streptococcus agalactiae; and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp. A dose of 450 mg orally once daily is recommended, followed by a maintenance dose of 300 mg orally once daily. Importantly, omadacycline does not require dose adjustment for patients based on BMI, age, gender, or renal or hepatic impairment.

The clinical efficacy of cefoperazone-sulbactam versus piperacillin-tazobactam in the treatment of severe community-acquired pneumonia.

The objective was to compare the clinical efficacy of cefoperazone-sulbactam with piperacillin-tazobactam in the treatment of severe community-acquired pneumonia (SCAP). The retrospective study was conducted from March 1, 2018 to May 30, 2019. Clinical outcomes were compared for patients who received either cefoperazone-sulbactam or piperacillin-tazobactam in the treatment of SCAP. A total of 815 SCAP patients were enrolled. Among them, 343 received cefoperazone-sulbactam, and 472 received piperacillin-tazobactam. Patients who received cefoperazone-sulbactam presented with higher Charlson Comorbidity Index scores. (6.20 ± 2.77 vs 5.72 ± 2.61; P = .009). The clinical cure rates and effectiveness for patients receiving cefoperazone-sulbactam and piperacillin-tazobactam were 84.2% versus 80.3% (P = .367) and 85.4% versus 83.3% (P = .258), respectively. In addition, the overall mortality rate of the cefoperazone-sulbactam group was 16% (n = 55), which was also comparable to the piperacillin-tazobactam group (17.8%, n = 84, P = .572). The primary clinical outcomes for patients receiving cefoperazone-sulbactam were superior compared to those receiving piperacillin-tazobactam after adjusting disease severity status. The clinical efficacy of cefoperazone-sulbactam in the treatment of adult patients with SCAP is comparable to that of piperacillin-tazobactam. After adjusting for disease severity, cefoperazone-sulbactam tended to be superior to piperacillin-tazobactam.

Current therapies and challenges for the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm-related infections.

Staphylococcus aureus is a major cause of nosocomial and community-acquired infections and contributes to significant increase in morbidity and mortality especially when associated with medical devices and in biofilm form. Biofilm structure provides a pathway for the enrichment of resistant and persistent phenotypes of S. aureus leading to relapse and recurrence of infection. Minimal diffusion of antibiotics inside biofilm structure leads to heterogeneity and distinct physiological activity. Additionally, horizontal gene transfer between cells in proximity adds to the challenges associated with eradication of biofilms. This narrative review focuses on biofilm-associated infections caused by S. aureus, the impact of environmental conditions on biofilm formation, interactions inside biofilm communities, and the clinical challenges that they present. Conclusively, potential solutions, novel treatment strategies, combination therapies, and reported alternatives are discussed.

Monitoring fluoroquinolone resistance among ESBL-positive and ESBL-negative Escherichia coli strains isolated from urinary tract infections: An alert for empirical treatment.

BACKGROUND: Bacterial resistance to extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) is present worldwide. Empirical antibiotic therapy is often needed, and the use of fluoroquinolones, such as ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin, is common. This study aimed to analyze the urine cultures from 2,680 outpatients in January 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022, with bacterial counts above 100,000 CFU/mL in which Escherichia coli was the etiological agent. METHODS: We monitored the resistance of ESBL-positive and ESBL-negative strains to ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin and evaluated resistance rates. RESULTS: Significantly higher fluoroquinolone resistance rates were observed among ESBL-positive strains in all years studied. Furthermore, a significant increase in the rate of fluoroquinolone resistance was observed between 2021 and 2022 in ESBL-positive and -negative strains, as well as from 2020 to 2021 among the ESBL-positive strains. CONCLUSIONS: The data obtained in the present study showed a tendency towards an increase in fluoroquinolone resistance among ESBL-positive and -negative E. coli strains isolated from urine cultures in Brazil. Since empirical antibiotic therapy with fluoroquinolones is commonly used to treat diverse types of infections, such as community-acquired urinary tract infections, this work highlights the need for continuous monitoring of fluoroquinolone resistance among E. coli strains circulating in the community, which can mitigate the frequency of therapeutic failures and development of widespread multidrug-resistant strains.

Clinical characteristics and pathogen analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the clinical characteristics and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid pathogens in elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). METHODS: This was a retrospective observational epidemiological study using that elderly cases diagnosed with community-acquired pneumonia receiving treatment at the Affiliated Hospital of North China University of Technology, Tangshan Hongci Hospital and Tangshan Fengnan District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine. A total of 92 cases were divided into two groups according to age. There were 44 patients over 75-year-old and 48 patients between 65 and 74-year-old. RESULTS: Compared with the elderly 65 to 74-year-old, the elderly over 75-year-old with diabetes are more likely to suffer from CAP (35.42% vs. 63.64%, p = 0.007) and are more likely to have mixed infections (6.25% vs. 22.73%, p = 0.023) or larger lesions (45.83% vs. 68.18%, p = 0.031). Their hospital stays will also be extended (39.58% vs. 63.64%, p = 0.020), and the albumin level (37.51 ± 8.92 vs. 30.93 ± 6.58, p = 0.000), the neutrophils level (9.09(6.26-10.63) vs. 7.18(5.35-9.17),p = 0.026) is significantly lower and the d-dimer (505.42 ± 197.12 vs. 611.82 ± 195.85, p = 0.011), PCT (0.08 ± 0.04 vs. 0.12 ± 0.07, p = 0.001) levels are significantly higher. CONCLUSION: The clinical symptoms and signs of elderly CAP patients are not so typical, and the infection is more serious. Attention should therefore be paid to elderly patients. Hypoalbuminemia and high d-dimer can predict the prognosis of patients.

Vitamin D as an adjunct to antibiotics for the treatment of acute childhood pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: Children with acute pneumonia may be vitamin D deficient. Clinical trials have found that prophylactic vitamin D supplementation decreases children's risk of developing pneumonia. Data on the therapeutic effects of vitamin D in acute childhood pneumonia are limited. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2018. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of vitamin D supplementation as an adjunct to antibiotics for the treatment of acute childhood pneumonia. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and two trial registries on 28 December 2021. We applied no language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared vitamin D supplementation with placebo in children (aged one month to five years) hospitalised with acute community-acquired pneumonia, as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) acute respiratory infection guidelines. For this update, we reappraised eligible trials according to research integrity criteria, excluding RCTs published from April 2018 that were not prospectively registered in a trials registry according to WHO or Clinical Trials Registry - India (CTRI) guidelines (it was not mandatory to register clinical trials in India before April 2018). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and extracted data. For dichotomous data, we extracted the number of participants experiencing the outcome and the total number of participants in each treatment group. For continuous data, we used the arithmetic mean and standard deviation (SD) for each treatment group together with number of participants in each group. We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. MAIN RESULTS: In this update, we included three new trials involving 468 children, bringing the total number of trials to seven, with 1601 children (631 with pneumonia and 970 with severe or very severe pneumonia). We categorised three previously included studies and three new studies as 'awaiting classification' based on the research integrity screen. Five trials used a single bolus dose of vitamin D (300,000 IU in one trial and 100,000 IU in four trials) at the onset of illness or within 24 hours of hospital admission; one used a daily dose of oral vitamin D (1000 IU for children aged up to one year and 2000 IU for children aged over one year) for five days; and one used variable doses (on day 1, 20,000 IU in children younger than six months, 50,000 IU in children aged six to 12 months, and 100,000 IU in children aged 13 to 59 months; followed by 10,000 IU/day for four days or until discharge). Three trials performed microbiological diagnosis of pneumonia, radiological diagnosis of pneumonia, or both. Vitamin D probably has little or no effect on the time to resolution of acute illness (mean difference (MD) -1.28 hours, 95% confidence interval (CI) -5.47 to 2.91; 5 trials, 1188 children; moderate-certainty evidence). We do not know if vitamin D has an effect on the duration of hospitalisation (MD 4.96 hours, 95% CI -8.28 to 18.21; 5 trials, 1023 children; very low-certainty evidence). We do not know if vitamin D has an effect on mortality rate (risk ratio (RR) 0.69, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.07; 3 trials, 584 children; low-certainty evidence). The trials reported no major adverse events. According to GRADE criteria, the evidence was of very low-to-moderate certainty for all outcomes, owing to serious trial limitations, inconsistency, indirectness, and imprecision. Three trials received funding: one from the New Zealand Aid Corporation, one from an institutional grant, and one from multigovernment organisations (Bangladesh, Sweden, and UK). The remaining four trials were unfunded. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Based on the available evidence, we are uncertain whether vitamin D supplementation has important effects on outcomes of acute pneumonia when used as an adjunct to antibiotics. The trials reported no major adverse events. Uncertainty in the evidence is due to imprecision, risk of bias, inconsistency, and indirectness.

Effect of pharmaceutical care on the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in the elderly: a case report.

OBJECTIVE: Elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) have more comorbidities, decreased organ function, and weakened immune function, which can easily lead to various adverse reactionsduring anti-infection treatment. Comprehensive geriatric assessment is a commonly used method to optimize the management of the clinical treatment of the elderly, of which the clinical pharmacists are the core member. However, few studies have focused on the participation of relevant clinical pharmacists of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) of elderly CAP patients. CASE PRESENTATION: A case where the clinical pharmacist participated in the entire process of medical treatment of an elderly patient with CAP. From the first day of admission to the hospital, anti-infective drugs were selected based on the condition combined with the distribution and drug-resistance of common local pathogens, paying attention to the changes of various indicators during treatment, the drug dose was adjusted in time, and targeted anticoagulation, cardiotonic, diuretic, potassium supplementation, intestinal flora regulation and anti-fungal treatment were carried out, as well as the prevention and treatment of antibiotic-related diarrhea. After 24 days of hospitalization, the patient was in a stable condition after treatment and was discharged from the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: The participation of clinical pharmacists in CGA had positive significance for the clinical treatment of elderly CAP, and it was worthy of further improvement and clinical promotion.

Etiology and efficacy of anti-microbial treatment for community-acquired pneumonia in adults requiring hospital admission in Ukraine.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Empiric therapy of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains the standard care and guidelines are mostly based on published data from the United States or Europe. In this study, we determined the bacterial etiology of CAP and evaluated the clinical outcomes under antimicrobial treatment of CAP in Ukraine. METHODS: A total of 98 adult subjects with CAP and PORT risk II-IV were recruited for the study. The sputum diagnostic samples were obtained from all patients for causative pathogen identification. Subjects were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive delafloxacin 300 mg (n=51) or moxifloxacin 400 mg (n=47) with blinding placebo. The switch to oral treatment was after a minimum of 6 IV doses according to clinical criteria. The total duration of antibacterial treatment was 5-10 days. In vitro susceptibility of pathogens to delafloxacin and other comparator antibiotics was determined. RESULTS: The most frequently isolated pathogens in adults with CAP were S. pneumoniae - 19.5%, M. pneumoniae - 15.3%, H. influenzae - 13.2%, S. aureus - 10.5%, K. pneumoniae - 10.1%, and H. parainfluenzae - 6.4%. All isolates of S. pneumoniae, S. aureus, M. pneumoniae had sufficient susceptibility to appropriate antibiotics. 9.0% of H. influenzae strains were susceptible to azithromycin. 94.8 % of patients had a successful clinical response to delafloxacin at the end of treatment and 93.9 % - at test-of-cure. CONCLUSIONS: In Ukraine, the major bacterial agents that induced CAP in adults were S. pneumoniae, M. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, S. aureus, K. pneumoniae, H. parainfluenzae, E. cloacae, L. pneumophila. Delafloxacin is a promising effective antibiotic for monotherapy for CAP in adults and could be used in cases of antimicrobial-resistant strains.

Economic Evaluation of Nemonoxacin, Moxifloxacin and Levofloxacin in the Treatment of Early Community-Acquired Pneumonia with Possible Pulmonary Tuberculosis.

The Chinese community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) Diagnosis and Treatment Guideline 2020 recommends quinolone antibiotics as the initial empirical treatment options for CAP. However, patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) are often misdiagnosed with CAP because of the similarity of symptoms. Moxifloxacin and levofloxacin have inhibitory effects on mycobacterium tuberculosis as compared with nemonoxacin, resulting in delayed diagnosis of PTB. Hence, the aim of this study is to compare the cost-effectiveness of nemonoxacin, moxifloxacin and levofloxacin in the treatment of CAP and to determine the value of these treatments in the differential diagnosis of PTB. Primary efficacy data were collected from phase II-III randomized, double-blind, multi-center clinical trials comparing nemonoxacin to moxifloxacin (CTR20130195) and nemonoxacin to levofloxacin (CTR20140439) for the treatment of Chinese CAP patients. A decision tree was constructed to compare the cost-utility among three groups under the perspective of healthcare system. The threshold for willingness to pay (WTP) is 1-3 times GDP per capita ($11,174-33,521). Scenarios including efficacy and cost for CAP patients with a total of 6% undifferentiated PTB. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed to test the robustness of basic analysis. The costs of nemonoxacin, moxifloxacin, and levofloxacin were $903.72, $1053.59, and $1212.06 and the outcomes were 188.7, 188.8, and 188.5 quality-adjusted life days (QALD), respectively. Nemonoxacin and moxifloxacin were dominant compared with levofloxacin, and the ICER of moxifloxacin compared with nemonoxacin was $551,643, which was much greater than WTP; therefore, nemonoxacin was the most cost-effective option. Regarding patients with PTB who were misdiagnosed with CAP, taking nemonoxacin could save $290.76 and $205.51 when compared with moxifloxacin and levofloxacin and resulted in a gain of 2.83 QALDs. Our findings demonstrate that nemonoxacin is the more economical compared with moxifloxacin and levofloxacin, and non-fluoroquinolone antibiotics are cost-saving and utility-increasing compared to fluoroquinolones in the differential diagnosis of PTB, which can help healthcare system in making optimal policies and help clinicians in the medication of patients.

Rationalising empirical antibiotics for bloodstream infections: A retrospective study at a South African district-level hospital.

BACKGROUND: Incorrect empirical antibiotic therapy is one of the factors that contribute to poor clinical outcomes and the development of antimicrobial resistance. Knowledge of the local infectious disease burden and antibiotic resistance patterns can assist with development of strategies, updating of guidelines and subsequent improvement in initial empirical therapy. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the empirical antibiotic choice for treatment of septic episodes at a district-level hospital was appropriate according to national guidelines, and to describe the epidemiological features of the septic episode population being studied and depict their antibiotic susceptibility profile. METHODS: This was a retrospective, descriptive study of adult inpatients with bloodstream infections at Karl Bremer Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa. Laboratory and clinical data were obtained and analysed for the period 1 July 2017 - 30 June 2018. Septic episodes were subdivided into community-acquired bloodstream infection (CABSI) and hospital-acquired bloodstream infection (HABSI) study populations, and empirical antibiotics for both groups were assessed and compared with the adult Standard Treatment Guidelines and Essential Medicines List for South Africa, Hospital Level Care, 2015 edition (STG and EML). RESULTS: Our study sample consisted of 184 septic episodes, isolated from 176 patients. Nearly half of the septic episodes (49.5%) were hospital acquired. Overall guideline adherence in the CABSI population was 88%, compared with 58% in the HABSI population. The reasons for guideline non-adherence in the CABSI population were lack of source-appropriate empirical antibiotics (n=7) and septic episodes where empirical antibiotics were indicated but not prescribed (n=4), while in the HABSI group the main reason was that the patients were treated by community-acquired standards (n=30; 33.0%). The in-hospital mortality rate for a septic episode in this study was 38%. Considering the typical first-line antibiotics used, 77.3% of CABSIs were found to be susceptible to co-amoxiclav (n=75) and 59.8% to ceftriaxone (n=58). With the exclusion of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Acinetobacter baumannii isolates as confounders, HABSIs had a susceptibility of 86% to the piperacillin/tazobactam plus amikacin combination, 81% to ertapenem, 90% to imipenem and 93% to meropenem. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates poor guideline adherence in HABSIs, emphasising the importance of distinguishing between CABSIs and HABSIs. The empirical antibiotics advised by the STG and EML were found to be appropriate in the majority of septic episodes. Future revision and improvement of prescribing practices can assist in rationalising empirical antibiotic decisions.

Delafloxacin for the treatment of adult patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia.

INTRODUCTION: Delafloxacin is a novel fluoroquinolone with peculiar characteristics such as a weak acid character, frequent in vitro activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and a low potential for resistance selection compared with other fluoroquinolones. AREAS COVERED: The present narrative review summarizes the available data on the use of delafloxacin for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). EXPERT OPINION: Delafloxacin is a novel fluoroquinolone with a unique profile and some interesting characteristics for the treatment of CABP, such as its marked activity against gram-positive bacteria, including MRSA, the possible use as monotherapy (owing to anti-Gram-negative and anti-atypical bacteria activity), the retained activity against many Gram-positive organisms resistant to other fluoroquinolones, and the availability of both oral and intravenous formulations. The results of the DEFINE-CABP phase-3 randomized controlled trial have shown noninferiority of delafloxacin vs. moxifloxacin for the treatment of CABP, thereby providing a further option for this indication. Against this background, future post-marketing experiences remain of crucial importance for further refining the place in therapy of delafloxacin in the real-life management algorithms of CABP, either as first-line option or step-down/outpatient treatment.

Multistep antimicrobial stewardship intervention on antibiotic prescriptions and treatment duration in children with pneumonia.

INTRODUCTION: The Italian antimicrobial prescription rate is one of the highest in Europe, and antibiotic resistance has become a serious problem with high costs and severe consequences, including prolonged illnesses, the increased period of hospitalization and mortality. Inadequate antibiotic prescriptions have been frequently reported, especially for lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI); many patients receive antibiotics for viral pneumonia or bronchiolitis or broad-spectrum antibiotics for not complicated community-acquired pneumonia. For this reason, healthcare organizations need to implement strategies to raise physicians' awareness about this kind of drug and their overall effect on the population. The implementation of antibiotic stewardship programs and the use of Clinical Pathways (CPs) are excellent solutions because they have proven to be effective tools at diagnostic and therapeutic levels. AIMS: This study evaluates the impact of CPs implementation in a Pediatric Emergency Department (PED), analyzing antibiotic prescriptions before and after the publication in 2015 and 2019. The CP developed in 2019 represents an update of the previous one with the introduction of serum procalcitonin. The study aims to evaluate the antibiotic prescriptions in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) before and after both CPs (2015 and 2019). METHODS: The periods analyzed are seven semesters (one before CP-2015 called PRE period, five post CP-2015 called POST 1-5 and 1 post CP-2019 called POST6). The patients have been split into two groups: (i) children admitted to the Pediatric Acute Care Unit (INPATIENTS), and (ii) patients evaluated in the PED and sent back home (OUTPATIENTS). We have analyzed all descriptive diagnosis of CAP (the assessment of episodes with a descriptive diagnosis were conducted independently by two pediatricians) and CAP with ICD9 classification. All antibiotic prescriptions for pediatric patients with CAP were analyzed. RESULTS: A drastic reduction of broad-spectrum antibiotics prescription for inpatients has been noticed; from 100.0% in the PRE-period to 66.7% in POST1, and up to 38.5% in POST6. Simultaneously, an increase in amoxicillin use from 33.3% in the PRE-period to 76.1% in POST1 (p-value 0.078 and 0.018) has been seen. The outpatients' group's broad-spectrum antibiotics prescriptions decreased from 54.6% PRE to 17.4% in POST6. Both for outpatients and inpatients, there was a decrease of macrolides. The inpatient group's antibiotic therapy duration decreased from 13.5 days (PRE-period) to 7.0 days in the POST6. Antibiotic therapy duration in the outpatient group decreased from 9.0 days (PRE) to 7.0 days (POST1), maintaining the same value in subsequent periods. Overlapping results were seen in the ICD9 group for both inpatients and outpatients. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that CPs are effective tools for an antibiotic stewardship program. Indeed, broad-spectrum antibiotics usage has dropped and amoxicillin prescriptions have increased after implementing the CAP CP-2015 and the 2019 update.

Development of a Weighted-Incidence Syndromic Combination Antibiogram (WISCA) to guide the choice of the empiric antibiotic treatment for urinary tract infection in paediatric patients: a Bayesian approach.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the ability of Weighted-Incidence Syndromic Combination Antibiograms (WISCA) to inform the selection of empirical antibiotic regimens for suspected paediatric community-acquired urinary tract infections. METHODS: Data were collected from outpatients (< 15 years) accessing the emergency rooms of Padua University-Hospital and Mestre Dell' Angelo-Hospital (Venice) between January 1st, 2016, and December 31st, 2018. WISCAs were developed by estimating the coverage of eight regimens using a Bayesian hierarchical model adjusted for age, sex, and previous antibiotic treatment or renal/urological comorbidities. RESULTS: 385 of 620 urine culture requests were included in the model analysis. The most frequently observed bacterium was E. coli (85% and 87%, Centre A and B). No centre effect on coverage estimates was found, and data were successfully pooled together. Coverage ranged from 77.8% (Co-trimoxazole) to 97.6% (Carbapenems). Complex cases and males had significantly lower odds of being covered by a regimen than non-complex cases and females (odds ratio (OR) 0.49 [95% HDI, 0.38-0.65], and OR: 0.73 [95% HDIs, 0.56-0.96] respectively). Children aged 3-5 years had lower odds of being covered by a regimen than other age groups, except for neonates. CONCLUSIONS: The developed WISCAs provide highly informative estimates on coverage patterns overcoming the limitation of combination antibiograms and expanding the framework of previous Bayesian WISCA algorithm.

Clinical Benefits and Cost-Effectiveness of Moxifloxacin as Initial Treatment for Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Meta-Analysis and Economic Evaluation.

PURPOSE: Moxifloxacin and levofloxacin are currently recommended as empirical initial treatment options for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in China according to guidelines. Most studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin in treating CAP as initial empirical treatment were single-centered trials assessing different clinical end points. In addition, there is limited research investigating moxifloxacin's clinical benefits in the context of health care resource utilization and reimbursement from the payer's perspective in China. Hence, this study was aimed at comparing the clinical efficacy of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin by conducting a meta-analysis and assessing their economic value from the China payer's perspective through a cost-utility analysis model. METHODS: For the meta-analysis, 6 bibliographic databases were searched for relevant publications from January 2000 to August 2020, and studies were assessed for eligibility under predetermined criteria. Meta-analysis was performed by using a random effects model when analyses included >2 trials. For the economic evaluation, a decision-tree model was constructed to investigate the cost-utility of moxifloxacin versus levofloxacin as initial regimens in the treatment of CAP inpatients. Parameter values were derived from meta-analysis, published literature, and clinician survey. The outcome was reported in the form of an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were undertaken to assess the robustness of the model. FINDINGS: Twenty-seven randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. Results indicated that the clinical response rate at the test-of-cure visit with initial treatment of moxifloxacin was significantly higher than that of levofloxacin (3441 patients; random effects model; I2 = 49%; odds ratio, 3.35; 95% CI, 2.35-4.77; P < 0.001). In terms of the safety profile, total adverse events were not significantly different between the 2 groups (2770 patients; random effects model; I2 = 40%; odds ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.56-1.06; P = 0.11). Output of the cost-utility model showed that under the willingness-to-pay threshold of one-time China gross domestic product per capita, moxifloxacin is dominant over levofloxacin, being less costly and more efficacious (0.002 quality-adjusted life year gained, CNY 844 [US$131] saved in total cost, negative incremental cost-effectiveness ratio). Sensitivity analyses indicated the robustness of the model as moxifloxacin remained dominant when model parameter values fluctuated. IMPLICATIONS: Moxifloxacin is more efficacious than levofloxacin as the initial empirical treatment for CAP. In addition, treatment of CAP with moxifloxacin instead of levofloxacin is expected to be cost-saving from the perspective of payers in China. However, for the cost-utility analysis, in the absence of a national representative database on costs for hospitalization in China, inputs in the cost-utility model could be underestimated or overestimated due to estimating errors applied to both treatment arms.