RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To describe epidemiology and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) data of bacteria causing invasive infections in Norwegian children (0-18 years). METHODS: Population-based observational study using prospectively collected AST data from the Norwegian Surveillance System of Antimicrobial Resistance from 2013 to 2017. We included all clinically relevant bacterial isolates (blood and cerebrospinal fluid), and compared incidence of invasive infections and AST data in isolates from children and adults. RESULTS: We included 1173 isolates from children and 44,561 isolates from adults. Staphylococcus aureus accounted for 220/477 (46.2%, 95% CI: 41.6-50.7) of all isolates in schoolchildren (6-18 years). Compared with Streptococcus pneumonia isolates from adults (N = 2674), we observed higher nonsusceptibility rates to penicillin in isolates from children (N = 151), 11.9% versus 5.8%, P < 0.01; also higher resistance rates to erythromycin (11.3% vs. 4.9%, P < 0.01), clindamycin (9.3% vs. 3.6%, P < 0.001), and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (17.9% vs. 6.4%, P < 0.001). Compared with Escherichia coli isolates in adults (N = 9073), we found lower rates of ESBL in isolates from children (N = 212), 2.4% versus 6.4%, P < 0.05. CONCLUSION: The study indicates the importance of microbiologic surveillance strategies in children and highlights the need for pediatric AST data. The high rates of nonsusceptibility to commonly used antibiotics among S. pneumoniae in children and the high burden of invasive S. aureus infections in schoolchildren calls for modifications of Norwegian guidelines.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bactérias/efeitos dos fármacos , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Bacterianas/epidemiologia , Resistência Microbiana a Medicamentos , Monitoramento Epidemiológico , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Noruega/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: According to Norwegian guidelines for antibiotic use in primary care, ciprofloxacin is reserved for complicated urinary tract infections (UTI). Despite these recommendations, ciprofloxacin use has increased in Norway in recent years. We aimed to reduce inappropriate ciprofloxacin prescribing in the emergency department. METHODS: An intervention study was performed by removing ciprofloxacin from the local antibiotic formulary and including a suggestion list for antibiotic use with all point of care urine dipstick testing in an emergency department. An emergency department in the neighbouring county served as the control. Prescriptions for UTI were registered 1 y prior to and 1 y after the intervention. RESULTS: In the targeted emergency department, there was a significant (p < 0.0001) reduction in ciprofloxacin prescribing for cystitis, while the use of mecillinam increased (p = 0.042). In the control department, prescribing of ciprofloxacin doubled (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: An intervention based on a therapy suggestion list and on limiting the availability of ciprofloxacin in the local formulary, resulted in treatment more in line with national guidelines by reducing ciprofloxacin and increasing mecillinam prescribing.