[Performances of breast magnetic resonance imaging in the context of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer to predict pathological complete response]. / Performances de l'imagerie par résonance magnétique au cours des chimiothérapies néoadjuvantes du cancer du sein pour prédire la réponse pathologique complète.

PURPOSE: The objective of this work was to estimate the reliability of MRI after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for breast cancer to detect a residual tumour by comparing the tumoral size measured by MRI with the histological size. We also estimated the concordance of diagnosis of complete pathological response between histological examination and MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included all the patients who received a neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer in the university hospital of Tours from January, 2008 to December 31st, 2012 and in the comprehensive cancer centre of Rennes from January, 2008 till May 31st 201. We considered that the pathological response was complete (pCR) when there was no residual invasive tumour in the mammary surgical specimen. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty-one women who received NAC for a non-metastatic breast cancer were included in the study: 103 in Tours and 148 in Rennes. Two women (0.8%) refused breast surgery whatever the type. One hundred and twenty-three (49%) women had a breast conservative surgery. One hundred and fifteen (45.8%) had a mastectomy and 11 (4.4%) had breast conservative surgery followed by mastectomy for positive margins. A complete pathological response was present in 54 cases (21.5%). We did not found any significant difference between characteristics of patients with pCR or not. CONCLUSION: Breast MRI remains the most performing examination to evaluate the initial tumoral size and the residual tumour after NAC, but does not add any value at mid or at the end of treatment for the patients to whom a mastectomy is decided at presentation. The correlation between the breast MRI and the histology size is not perfect, but at the moment, MRI stills of the most performing examination to predict the pCR.

Conservative treatment feasibility with induction chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy for patients with breast carcinoma larger than 3 cm.

BACKGROUND: The traditional surgical treatment for operable breast carcinoma larger than 3 cm is mastectomy. To avoid mutilating surgery, the authors administered primary chemotherapy to 158 patients with operable nonmetastatic large breast carcinoma with a TNM classification of T2 greater than 3 cm and T3 with a lymph node status of N0-N1. Conservative treatment was proposed for patients responding to the chemotherapy and whose tumor was reduced to 3 cm or less. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the feasibility and treatment results of this strategy. METHODS: The mean patient age was 50.4 years. Eighty-two patients had T2 carcinomas greater than 3 cm, and 76 had T3 carcinoma. Fifty-four tumors were classified as lymph node status N0, and 104 as N1. Mean tumor size was 5.6 cm. Patients were treated with three courses of the NVCF regimen (mitoxantrone, vindesin, cyclophosphamide, and 5-fluorouracil) or the EVCF regimen, in which mitoxantrone was replaced by epirubicin every 4 weeks, and then administered with a radiosurgical combination. RESULTS: The overall response rate to induction chemotherapy was 60.8% with 20.2% complete tumor regression. Twenty-one percent of the patients experienced grade 3 or 4 chemotherapy toxic effects, which were all acceptable and reversible. Breast-conserving treatment was feasible in 48.7% of patients (77 of 158). Forty-five patients (28.5%) were treated with a radiosurgical combination (tumorectomy plus radiation therapy), whereas 32 (20.2%) were treated with radiotherapy alone (external irradiation and brachytherapy). Other patients were treated with mastectomy. Age, tumor stage, histology, hormonal status, and hormonal receptor rate had no influence on the frequency of the observed regressions. Isolated recurrences occurred in 11 patients, 6 who were treated conservatively and 5 who were treated with mastectomy. Metastatic relapses were observed in 38 patients (14.6% in the chemotherapy responders and 38.7% in the nonresponders) (P < 0.02). Five-year actuarial survival was 73.2% and was significantly higher for responders to the induction treatment. CONCLUSION: These preliminary results suggest that primary chemotherapy and radiosurgical breast-conserving treatment is feasible and is an alternative to mastectomy for patients with large operable breast carcinoma who are responders to the induction treatment. The long term benefit of this strategy must be evaluated in well designed controlled trials.