Spectrophotometric determination of gold(III) in forensic and pharmaceutical samples and results complemented with ICP AES and EDXRF analysis.

Spectrophotometric method with three systems were developed here for the determination of gold(III) using o-dianisidine, aniline sulphate and catechol. Gold(III),in the system 1 it oxidizes o-dianisidine, in the system 2 it oxidizes catechol followed by its coupling with o-dianisidine, in the system 3 it oxidizes catechol followed by its coupling with aniline sulphate forming dye products with respective λmax 446nm, 540nm, and 505nm. All the three systems were optimized and analytical parameters were calculated. The molar absorptivity values were 9.27×104, 1.97×104 and 1.62×104 respectively for the systems 1, 2 and 3 with the corresponding Sandell sensitivity values (µgcm-2), 0.0021, 0.0096 and 0.011. The optimized systems were used for the determination of gold present in some forensic jewellery and pharmaceutical samples and the results obtained were compared with the results of all samples determined by Inductively Coupled Plasma - Atomic Emission Spectrometric method and a few of them were also complemented by Energy Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescent spectral analysis.

A ripening associated peroxidase from papaya having a role in defense and lignification: heterologous expression and in-silico and in-vitro experimental validation.

Fruit ripening associated full length cDNA of a peroxidase from papaya was cloned and heterologously expressed. The expressed peroxidase was activated by in-vitro re-folding in the presence of hemin and calcium. The purified recombinant peroxidase exhibited broad substrate affinity in the order of o-dianisidine>pyrogallol>guaiacol and was found to be a homotetramer of 155kDa with each subunit having a size of 38kDa. The basis of the distinctive preferences for various substrates was investigated through in-silico molecular modeling approaches. Thus, when the modeled papaya peroxidase-heme complex was docked with these substrates, the in-silico binding efficiency was found to be in agreement with those of wet lab results with the involvement of Arg37, Phe40, His41, Pro137, Asn138, His139, His167, and Phe239 as the common interacting residues in all the cases. However, the binding of the different substrates were found to be associated with conformational changes in the peroxidase. Thus, in the case of o-dianisidine (the most efficient substrate), the protein was folded in the most compact fashion when compared to guaiacol (the least efficient substrate). Protein function annotation analyses revealed that the papaya peroxidase may have biological roles in oxidation-reduction processes, stresses, defense responses etc. In order to further validate its role in lignifications, the papaya peroxidase was compared with a lignin biosynthetic peroxidase from Leucaena leucocephala, a tree legume. Thus, based on 3D structure superimposition and docking, both peroxidases exhibited a great extent of similarity suggesting the papaya peroxidase having a role in lignification (defense response) too. The predicted functions of papaya peroxidase in defense response and lignification were further validated experimentally using qRT-PCR analyses and measurement of oxidation of coniferyl alcohol.

Characterization of peroxidase in buckwheat seed.

A peroxidase (POX)-containing fraction was purified from buckwheat seed. The POX consisted of two isozymes, POX I and POX II, that were purified 6.6- and 67.4-fold, respectively. Their molecular weights were estimated to be 46.1 kDa (POX I) and 58.1 kDa (POX II) by gel filtration. While POX I and II each oxidized quercetin, o-dianisidine, ascorbic acid and guaiacol, only POX II oxidized ABTS. Kinetic studies revealed that POX I and II had lower K(m) values for quercetin (0.071 and 0.028 mM), ABTS (0.016 mM for POX II) and ascorbic acid (0.043 and 0.029 mM) than for o-dianisidine (0.229 and 0.137 mM) and guaiacol (0.288 and 0 ). The optimum pHs of POX I and II for various substrates were almost the same, except for quercetin; pH 8.0 for POX I and pH 4.5 for II. Their optimal temperatures were 30 degrees C (POX I) and 10 degrees C (POX II), and POX I was more stable than POX II above 30 degrees C.