RESUMEN
Nursing education at the undergraduate and graduate levels is undergoing a transformational curricular change that includes moving toward a competency-based curriculum. This opportunity holds promise to close the education-practice gap that has plagued nursing education for decades. A key teaching modality to achieve this outcome is simulation-based education. This article will explore the interaction between simulation and competency-based education.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Educación Basada en Competencias , Curriculum , Humanos , Competencia Clínica/normas , Curriculum/normas , Bachillerato en Enfermería/normas , Bachillerato en Enfermería/métodos , Entrenamiento Simulado/normas , Entrenamiento Simulado/métodos , Educación de Postgrado en Enfermería/normasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The intent of the PICOT (i.e., Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Time) method is to formulate focused clinical questions to facilitate the discovery of relevant evidence through systematic searching, with the components of the question serving as the foundation for the search. Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) graduates use evidence-based practices to institute changes in their organizations' systems and policies, thereby yielding positive effects on both patient and system outcomes. Given that the clinical question is the foundation of the evidence-based practice process, DNP graduates' competence in the PICOT method needs to be better understood. AIMS: This analysis aimed to describe how DNP students used the PICOT method to ask clinical questions in their DNP projects. METHODS: Project questions were retrieved from a subset (n = 129, 60.56%) of an existing national random sample of publicly available DNP projects spanning the years 2010 to 2021 from Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education-accredited schools (n = 213). Project questions using the PICOT method were further evaluated with a scoring system of 0 = no and 1 = yes for missing elements, formatting, directional outcome, and project purpose. Possible scores ranged from 0 to 8, with higher scores indicating more errors. Discussion among five researchers, until agreement was achieved, yielded consensus. RESULTS: Although the PICOT method was project author-identified in 66 (31.0%) projects, only four (6%) followed the PICOT method. All 66 (100%) were intervention questions. There were 2.74 (SD 1.55) mean errors, ranging from 0 to 6. No questions were missing P or O. Specific errors included missing I 3 (4.5%) or missing C 37 (56%), poor formatting 34 (51.5%), directional outcome 44 (66.7%), and project purpose 38 (57.6%). Thirty-three (50%) of the questions were missing T; however, T is not used for searching, so researchers recalculated the mean error without T (M = 2.24, SD = 1.28, range 0-5). LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION: Gaps in the accurate use of the PICOT method to construct clinical questions can lead to biased searches, inaccurate clinical problem identification, and, when used as the project purpose, jumping to non-evidence-based solutions. Academic faculty and clinical educators can mitigate these skewed outcomes and enhance their impact on quality outcomes by helping DNP-prepared nurses shore up this foundational skill.
Asunto(s)
Educación de Postgrado en Enfermería , Estudiantes de Enfermería , Humanos , Educación de Postgrado en Enfermería/métodos , Educación de Postgrado en Enfermería/normas , Educación de Postgrado en Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudiantes de Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
ABSTRACT: Nursing is an inseparable job with the healthy life of human beings. High-level nursing talents have a greater influence on patients. It is the future trend for schools to train Nursing Professional Degree Postgraduate, and the evaluation of their education quality is the top priority.To construct the education quality evaluation index system of Nursing Professional Degree Postgraduate and to determine the weight of each indicator.Firstly, the indicators of the evaluation index system of education quality were identified from the literature review. Meanwhile, the Delphi questionnaire was designed and 13 experts evaluated and rated the indictors who were invited to conduct two rounds of the questionnaire. The weights associated with the factors were determined using the analytic hierarchy process and percentage methods, Finally, we developed the evaluation index system of education quality for a postgraduate nursing professional degree.The evaluation system consisted of 4 first-level indicators, 17 second-level indicators, and 71 third-level indicators. According to the weights computed by analytic hierarchy process, first-level indicators are ranked as "Input quality" (0.1273), "Process quality" (0.3111), "Output quality" (0.0846), "Development quality" (0.4770). Among the secondary indicators, experts pay the most attention to career development (0.3180). The top three indicators of third-level indicators are workplace (0.2385), matching degree between personal expectations and job opportunities (0.1272), and promotion opportunities (0.0795).The quality index system of nursing postgraduate education is scientific and reliable, and the weight distribution is reasonable. It is an effective tool for evaluating the quality of nursing graduate education.
Asunto(s)
Proceso de Jerarquía Analítica , Educación de Postgrado en Enfermería/normas , Técnica Delphi , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Lugar de TrabajoRESUMEN
Statistics knowledge is essential for nursing faculty in both teaching and research roles. In the teaching role when discussing nursing research, nursing faculty are confronted with statistical concepts and statistical methods applications. Knowledge of fundamental statistical concepts is needed so that nursing faculty can understand and critically evaluate the literature. The purpose of this study was to assess nursing faculty knowledge of fundamental statistical concepts. A probability sample with a 7.7% response rate yielded participation from 164 nursing faculty from 26 accredited schools. Results showed that most faculty members (91.5%) read peer-reviewed health-related scientific journal articles. On average, nursing faculty answered 5.1 (SD = 1.6) out of 8 statistical knowledge questions correctly. Problematic concepts included randomization (43.3% correct), and interpreting a confidence interval (42.7%) and odds ratio (33.5%). The results of this study may be used to improve statistics education and training for future nursing faculty and strengthen scholarship for nursing faculty conducting research.
Asunto(s)
Educación de Postgrado en Enfermería/normas , Docentes de Enfermería/normas , Competencia Profesional/normas , Estadística como Asunto/normas , Estudios Transversales , Educación de Postgrado en Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos , Docentes de Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Competencia Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Instituciones Académicas/organización & administración , Instituciones Académicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to quantify faculty and student perceptions of scholarly activities for doctor of nursing practice (DNP) and PhD leaders. BACKGROUND: The American Association of Colleges of Nursing describes DNP as a practice-focused degree and PhD as a research-focused degree. In 2016, the Council on Graduate Education for Administration in Nursing (now Association for Leadership Science in Nursing) published in the Journal of Nursing Administration sample practice objectives for DNP and research objectives for PhD leaders. METHODS: Using the published objectives, we surveyed faculty and students to quantify congruence with the publication and consistency within groups. The data informed intraprofessional education constructed using action research. RESULTS: There was low congruence between faculty and student responses with the article. PhD faculty had the least, and PhD students, the greatest, consistency in survey responses. CONCLUSIONS: Confusion exists within our faculty and students around differentiating PhD and DNP scholarly activities. Data supported need to clarify scholarly role boundaries through intraprofessional education.
Asunto(s)
Rendimiento Académico/normas , Educación de Postgrado en Enfermería/normas , Docentes de Enfermería/psicología , Percepción , Estudiantes de Enfermería/psicología , Rendimiento Académico/psicología , Educación de Postgrado en Enfermería/métodos , Educación de Postgrado en Enfermería/tendencias , Docentes de Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Liderazgo , Estudiantes de Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To assess graduate nursing students' lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT)-specific health competencies. METHOD: Using a cross-sectional design, a 13-item multiple response survey, derived from The Joint Commission guidelines and LGBT health competencies proposed by the Association of American Medical Colleges, was administered online to 116 registered nurses enrolled in graduate study. Survey items assessed nurses' knowledge of LGBT health, professionalism, provision of patient care, communication skills, care environment, gaps in learning, and systems-based practice. Descriptive analyses were used to summarize frequencies and proportions of study variables. RESULTS: Respondent nurses' knowledge about health, prevalent conditions, and social factors that influence LGBT health was somewhat limited. Respondents did not rate their knowledge about LGBT health high (µ = 3.11 [1.1], median = 3) and did not feel qualified to educate other colleagues about LGBT health issues (µ = 2.43 [1.26], median = 2). But 58% (n = 65) indicated that they felt comfortable performing prostate exams on transgender female patients (born with male genitalia); 62% (n = 70) felt comfortable doing pap smears for transgender male patients (born with female genitalia). Sixty nurses (52%) stated that they would advocate reforms within existing health care institutions to improve the care of LGBT patients. Cultural competency training was offered in some health care settings and environmental indications of inclusivity were inconsistent. CONCLUSIONS: LGBT health competence among graduate nursing students was limited. There is a need to reevaluate LGBT health-related content in nursing curricula as well as robust assessment of competence in LGBT health.
Asunto(s)
Educación de Postgrado en Enfermería/normas , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/psicología , Minorías Sexuales y de Género/educación , Adulto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Estudios Transversales , Competencia Cultural/educación , Competencia Cultural/psicología , Educación de Postgrado en Enfermería/métodos , Educación de Postgrado en Enfermería/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/estadística & datos numéricos , Minorías Sexuales y de Género/psicología , Estudiantes de Enfermería/psicología , Estudiantes de Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
With the inception of the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) as the designated practice doctorate in nursing and ultimate acceptance of the DNP as a terminal degree in nursing by professional nursing organizations, questions have arisen about the implications for faculty appointment in the teaching-learning in nursing. Following a brief discussion of the background of the DNP and recent trends in academic nursing programs, a challenge is presented to nurse faculty and administrators to consider carefully the illuminated critical issues and concerns in planning for the future of teaching-learning in nursing.
Asunto(s)
Habilitación Profesional/tendencias , Educación de Postgrado en Enfermería/tendencias , Docentes de Enfermería/educación , Habilitación Profesional/normas , Educación de Postgrado en Enfermería/normas , Docentes de Enfermería/tendencias , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: It is important for researchers to be open and transparent about the relationship between themselves and the subjects of their enquiry. Reflexivity enables them to do this, but although there is much guidance in the literature about reflexivity in general, there is little guidance for PhD candidates on including it in their theses. AIM: To provide a practical illustration of how researchers can evidence reflexivity in their theses. DISCUSSION: The author presents the reflexive stance and journey she made when completing a PhD study that used constructivist grounded theory. It predominantly depicts the influences on the choices and decisions she made, so the reader can make sense of the journey she undertook. The author depicts how she began her journey as a novice nurse researcher and concluded it as a fully fledged researcher. CONCLUSION: There has been much debate about how to integrate reflexivity in the context of a particular study. This article highlights the importance of reflexivity in research and uses excerpts from the author's thesis to illustrate how it can be presented in a thesis. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The article provides a guide and questions for PhD candidates to consider so they can present and think more deeply about reflexivity in their theses.
Asunto(s)
Tesis Académicas como Asunto/normas , Educación de Postgrado en Enfermería/normas , Teoría Fundamentada , Guías como Asunto , Investigación en Enfermería/normas , Proyectos de Investigación , Investigadores/psicología , Adulto , Toma de Decisiones , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Investigación Metodológica en Enfermería , Investigación CualitativaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In 2004, the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) called for all nursing schools to phase out master's-level preparation for advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) and transition to doctor of nursing practice (DNP) preparation only by 2015. Today, five years after the AACN's deadline, nursing has not yet adopted a universal DNP standard for APRN practice entry. PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to examine the factors influencing the ability of nursing schools to implement a universal DNP standard for APRNs. METHODS: Deans from top-ranked nursing schools explore the current state of the DNP degree in the US. The authors draw upon their collective experience as national leaders in academic nursing, long-time influencers on this debate, and heads of DNP programs themselves. This insight is combined with a synthesis of the literature and analysis of previously unpublished data from the AACN on trends in nursing doctoral education. FINDINGS: This paper highlights issues such as the long history of inconsistency (in messaging, curricula, etc.) surrounding the DNP, certification and accreditation challenges, cost barriers, and more. The authors apply COVID-19 as a case study to help place DNP graduates within a real-world context for health system stakeholders whose buy-in is essential for the success of this professional transition. DISCUSSION: This paper describes the DNP's standing in today's professional environment and advances the conversation on key barriers to its adoption. Insights are shared regarding critical next steps to ensure national acceptance of the DNP as nursing's terminal practice degree.
Asunto(s)
Enfermería de Práctica Avanzada/educación , Educación de Postgrado en Enfermería/organización & administración , Educación de Postgrado en Enfermería/normas , Facultades de Enfermería/organización & administración , Curriculum , Humanos , Investigación en Educación de Enfermería , Sociedades de Enfermería , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Recent reports from the Institute of Medicine document the increase in the number of nurses enrolled in doctoral education preparing for nurse scientist and leadership roles in the transformation of health care. This means that many doctoral students will acquire a knowledge of the research process, learn how to review and critique relevant literature, select appropriate research designs, and with the guidance of their dissertation chair and committee, design and conduct high quality, scholarly research studies that culminate in successfully defended doctoral dissertations. The health care profession expects that these dissertations, which include quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods, will contribute to the knowledge base of the nursing profession and advance improvement in clinical and public health outcomes in the populations served by the nursing profession. This article reviews the concept of rigor in research, the rationale for rigor, various approaches that increase rigor, and the associated concepts that strengthen a research study.
Asunto(s)
Tesis Académicas como Asunto/normas , Educación de Postgrado en Enfermería/métodos , Estudiantes de Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos , Educación de Postgrado en Enfermería/normas , Educación de Postgrado en Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos , HumanosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: to analyze the technological production of three professional master programs in the area of Nursing. METHOD: documentary research on primary sources. A total of 100 graduate nurses from three professional master's programs in Nursing in the Southeastern region of Brazil were analyzed, based on the following variables: time of training, typology of products; context of products and technological and educational classification, welfare and management. The study was guided by the question: "How is the technological production of the dissertation of the professional master's degree according to typology, context and technological classification? The analysis of the data was based on the construction of a table that categorized the products according to the typology. RESULTS: development of techniques was the main type of product found, being expressed by flowcharts, protocols, guidelines and training courses. The products were mostly developed in the hospital context, in the educational technology format. CONCLUSION: the technological production of the analyzed programs is restricted, diffuse and, in its majority, of low social impact and has no relevance in the body of the dissertation. Despite the wide possibility of conclusion work, the dissertation, accompanied by an article and/or technical productions, is the main form of presentation.
Asunto(s)
Educación de Postgrado en Enfermería/normas , Investigación en Enfermería/normas , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Edición/normas , Bibliometría , Brasil , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud/normas , Humanos , Investigación en Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudiantes de Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos , TecnologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The characteristics of nursing doctoral programs and the doctoral students' experience have not been thoroughly investigated. Hence, this study aimed to describe the characteristics of nursing doctoral programs in East and South East Asian (ESEA) countries and regions from the views of doctoral program coordinators, and to explore the students' experiences of and satisfaction with their doctoral nursing program. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted using two self-designed questionnaires, one focusing on PhD program coordinators and the other on doctoral students. Characteristics of the nursing doctoral programs focused on program characteristics, faculty characteristics, career pathways for graduates, and challenges for nursing doctoral education. Doctoral students' assessment of study experiences included quality of supervision, doctoral training programs, intellectual/cultural climate of institutions, general facilities/support, and the overall study experience and satisfaction. RESULTS: In the PhD coordinators survey, 46 institutions across nine ESEA countries and regions participated. More than half of nursing departments had academic members from other health science disciplines to supervise doctoral nursing students. The majority of graduates were holding academic or research positions in higher education institutions. Faculty shortages, delays in the completion of the program and inadequate financial support were commonly reported challenges for doctoral nursing education. In the students' survey, 193 doctoral students participated. 88.3% of the students were satisfied with the supervision they received from their supervisors; however, 79% reported that their supervisors 'pushed' them to publish research papers. For doctoral training programs, 75.5% were satisfied with their curriculum; but around half reported that the teaching training components (55.9%) and mobility opportunities (54.2%) were not included in their programs. For overall satisfaction with the intellectual and cultural climate, the percentages were 76.1 and 68.1%, respectively. Only 66.7% of the students felt satisfied with the facilities provided by their universities and nursing institutions. CONCLUSION: Doctoral nursing programs in most of the ESEA countries value the importance of both research and coursework. Doctoral nursing students generally hold positive experiences of their study. However, incorporating more teaching training components, providing more opportunities for international mobility, and making more effort to improve research-related facilities may further enhance the student experience. There is also a need to have international guidelines and standards for quality indicators of doctoral programs to maintain quality and find solutions to global challenges in nursing doctoral education.
Asunto(s)
Curriculum/normas , Educación de Postgrado en Enfermería/normas , Investigación en Educación de Enfermería , Satisfacción Personal , Asia Sudoriental , Estudios Transversales , Educación en Enfermería , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudiantes de EnfermeríaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Providing end of life care (EoLC) is an important aspect of primary care, which reduces the risk of hospital admission for most patients. However, general practitioners (GPs) seem to have low confidence in their ability to provide EoLC. Little is known about an adequate volume and kind of training in EoLC among GP trainees. METHODS: We performed a before-after comparison in all post-graduate GP trainees who were registered in the vocational training program (KWBW VerbundweiterbildungPLUS). They were offered participation within a two-day seminar focussing on palliative care in 2017. Those who attended the seminar (intervention group I) completed a paper-based questionnaire directly before the intervention (T1) and 6 months after (T2). None-attendees (group C) were also asked to fill out the questionnaire once. The questionnaire covered previous experiences in palliative care, self-assessment of competencies in EoLC in the organisation of patient care as well as in control of symptoms, attitudes towards death and caring for dying patients and questions about GPs' role in EoLC. RESULTS: In total, 294 GP trainees (I: n = 219; C: n = 75) participated in the study. Of those, more than 90% had previously gained experience in EoLC mainly during vocational training in the hospital rotation. Around a third had previously gained competencies in EoLC in medical school. Between groups I (T1) and C no significant differences were observed in socio-demographic characteristics, pre-existing experience or overall expertise. At T2, 75% of participants of group I declared they have extended their competencies in EoLC after the intervention and 70% classified the intervention as helpful or very helpful. Overall, they rated their competencies significantly higher than at T1 (p < 0.01). In detail, competencies in organisation of EoLC and competencies in handling of symptoms significantly improved (p < 0.01). Due to the intervention, 66% could reflect their attitudes towards dying, death and grief and 18% changed their attitudes. Group I highlighted palliative care as one of GPs tasks (Likert 4.47/5, SD 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: The intervention fostered personal competencies, understanding and self-confidence in EoLC among GP trainees. This is crucial for the aim to broadly provide EoLC.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica/normas , Educación de Postgrado en Enfermería/normas , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Cuidado Terminal/métodos , Adulto , Educación de Postgrado en Enfermería/métodos , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To explore the teaching and learning experience of midwifery mentors and student midwives in a midwifery led unit. The aim of this paper is to discuss how a conceptual framework emerged from the findings of the study. DESIGN AND METHOD: Ethnography. Non-participant observation of the daily work of an alongside midwifery led unit (AMU) over 14 months, and direct observation of episodes of care involving ten dyads of midwifery mentors and student midwife dyads. These observations were followed by individual semi structured interviews with participants. SETTING: An alongside midwifery led unit in a Health Board in Wales, UK. This is an option for place of birth in the National Health Service in the UK. SAMPLE: Ten dyads of midwifery mentors and student midwives. FINDINGS: A conceptual framework emerged from the data in relation to the powerfully shared goals and ethos of the midwives working in this AMU. The framework gave shape and form to the particular nature of the teaching and learning experience in the midwifery led setting. The concept of a community of practice, firmly rooted in the authoritative knowledge and understanding of physiological birth, resulted in positive working practices and happy, motivated midwives who enhanced the birth experience for women. This supported the clinical and socially situated learning of student midwives and new colleagues through legitimate peripheral participation. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE, POLICY, EDUCATION AND RESEARCH: Positive, committed and autonomous midwives make for a nurturing working environment and may therefore enhance the experience of birthing women. Midwives need to be able to work in an environment and community of practice which mirrors their own philosophy of care to promote professional wellbeing, and to develop the expert knowledge and skill in that area of practice over time.
Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud Materna/normas , Cultura Organizacional , Preceptoría/normas , Estudiantes de Enfermería/psicología , Educación de Postgrado en Enfermería/métodos , Educación de Postgrado en Enfermería/normas , Humanos , Preceptoría/métodos , Investigación Cualitativa , Estudiantes de Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos , GalesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Specialist graduate emergency nursing education programs are essential to the delivery of high quality and safe healthcare to patients with complex needs in emergency care. Little is known about tertiary emergency nursing programs in Australia. This study aimed to determine the academic and professional characteristics of Australian emergency programs. METHOD: This embedded mixed-method study examined the academic and professional characteristics of Australian emergency programs in two interdependent phases: (1) document and content analysis of Australian graduate emergency nursing program websites; and (2) semi-structured interviews with the associated convenors. The data underwent framework analysis using eight pre-identified categories of (i) course entry, (ii) fee arrangement, (iii) mode of delivery, (iv) volume of learning, (v) clinical assessment, (vi) employment requirements, (vii) graduate expectations, and (viii) influence of healthcare employers and professional engagement. RESULTS: Prior clinical experience and the requirement for concurrent practising in an emergency care environment influenced were common, however fee arrangements were not clearly articulated. The College of Emergency Nursing Australasia Practice Standards for the Emergency Nursing Specialist featured in part within 12 programs, principally to guide development of clinical assessments. CONCLUSION: Establishment of emergency nursing graduate practice standards could better inform the design and delivery of emergency nurse programs, and yield benefits in terms of graduate expectations and satisfaction and improved patient care.
Asunto(s)
Éxito Académico , Educación de Postgrado en Enfermería/clasificación , Educación de Postgrado en Enfermería/normas , Australia , Educación de Postgrado en Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Profesionalismo , Facultades de Enfermería/organización & administración , Facultades de Enfermería/normas , Facultades de Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
There is a lack of standardization among evaluations completed by clinical educators of student registered nurse anesthetists (SRNAs) during their clinical education as reported by nurse anesthesia program administrators and students. To address this issue, the Council on Accreditation of Nurse Anesthesia Educational Programs (COA) Board created the Common Clinical Assessment Tool (CCAT) Special Interest Group to develop a standardized clinical evaluation instrument. The goal was to improve the consistency of clinical evaluation across nurse anesthesia programs while assisting program administrators to make programmatic changes to ensure compliance with COA standards. In May 2016, the CCAT Special Interest Group began to create an evaluation instrument that was competency based and reflective of the COA's Practice Doctorate Standards. After a review of literature, input from the communities of interest, results from the American Association of Nurse Anesthetists professional practice survey, and analysis of the National Certification Examination for Nurse Anesthetists content outline and information from other sources, a draft CCAT was completed. A Delphi study was conducted, and expert opinions from program administrators, academic and clinical faculty, and students were collected to ascertain consensus on competencies, competency descriptors, and progression indicators.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Educación de Postgrado en Enfermería/normas , Enfermeras Anestesistas/educación , Técnica Delphi , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
Master teachers are associated with achieving excellence in teaching; however, there are no research studies that describe master teachers in nursing. Based on an analysis of interview responses from eleven, experienced, full-time, undergraduate nurse educators, this qualitative study offers an empirically based description of characteristics and behaviors of master teachers in nursing. This description of master teachers provides nurse educators with characteristics and behaviors that may be needed to develop a master teacher practice. Increasing the number of master teachers in nursing could have implications for creating teaching criteria to evaluate teaching practice and develop professional development activities.
Asunto(s)
Educación de Postgrado en Enfermería/normas , Docentes de Enfermería/normas , Competencia Profesional/normas , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Curriculum/normas , Humanos , Rol de la Enfermera , Investigación en Educación de Enfermería , Enseñanza/normasRESUMEN
Introduction: Nursing programs requiring a short-term cultural diversity immersion experience can impose financial, family, and work schedule hardships for graduate students. This study aimed to measure changes in cultural practice, awareness, sensitivity, and behaviors before and after completing an online cultural diversity course without travel. Methodology: A quasi-experimental pretest/posttest design collected data from a convenience sample of graduate nursing students (n = 37) enrolled in a 16-week online course using the Cultural Competency Assessment (CAS/CCB), Culturally Congruent Care for Advanced Nursing Course Objectives (CCCAN-CLO) and Teaching/Assignment Inventory tools. Results: There was a statistically significant increase in graduate nursing students' cultural competency postcourse scores: CAS, t(36) = -5.16, p < .001; CCB, t(36) = -5.42, p < .001; CCCAN-CLO, t(36) = -6.21, p < .001. Students identified conducting cultural interviews and online discussions as the most effective teaching strategies and assignments for learning cultural diversity content. Conclusion: Effective approaches for teaching graduate nursing students' cultural diversity for practice are available for online learners.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Cultural/educación , Diversidad Cultural , Educación de Postgrado en Enfermería/métodos , Estudiantes de Enfermería/psicología , Adulto , Competencia Cultural/psicología , Educación de Postgrado en Enfermería/normas , Educación de Postgrado en Enfermería/tendencias , Evaluación Educacional/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermería Transcultural/educación , Universidades/organización & administración , Universidades/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Current doctoral degree options may not meet needs of nurses desiring educator roles in academic or health care settings. PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to assess preferences for existing terminal degree options for nurse educators and determine the need for a new doctoral degree in nursing education. METHOD: Nurses in practice, academia, and leadership nationwide (n = 826) answered a 19-item needs assessment survey regarding adequacy of and interest in terminal degree options. RESULTS: More than 60% reported current doctoral degrees available to nurse educators lack content in curriculum development and teaching-learning best practices in nursing. Most data supported a new terminal degree. CONCLUSION: A primary factor in nurses choosing not to enroll in a terminal degree program may be limited availability of education aligned with career goals. The doctor of nursing education, a practice degree parallel to the DNP, could prepare nurses for academic and practice educator roles.