Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.523
Filtrar
2.
Lancet Rheumatol ; 6(6): e352-e360, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38710192

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The adjuvanted herpes zoster subunit vaccine has shown good efficacy and safety in the general population. However, its effectiveness has not been comprehensively assessed in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). This study aimed to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of the adjuvanted herpes zoster subunit vaccine in patients with SLE. METHODS: This single-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, trial was done at the rheumatology outpatient clinic at Seoul National University Hospital, South Korea. Patients (aged ≥19 years) with clinically stable SLE and previous exposure (≥4 weeks) to immunosuppressive drugs were randomly assigned (4:1) via a central interactive web response system to receive herpes zoster subunit vaccine or placebo (0·5 mL intramuscular injection) at weeks 0 and 8. Investigators and participants were masked to intervention and group assignment. Anti-glycoprotein E antibody titres and glycoprotein E-specific cell-mediated vaccine responses were evaluated at baseline and at week 8 after the first dose, and at week 4, week 26, and week 52 after the second dose using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and flow cytometry, respectively. Reactogenicity, SLE disease activity, including Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 and British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-flare rate, were examined. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a positive humoral vaccine response 4 weeks after the second dose. The primary and safety analyses were done in a modified intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06001606. FINDINGS: Between June 14, and July 19, 2023, 65 patients with SLE were enrolled, of whom 52 were randomly assigned to the herpes zoster subunit vaccine and 13 to placebo. 49 patients in the vaccine group and 11 patients in the placebo group were included in the modified intention-to-treat population. 56 (93%) of 60 patients were women and four (7%) were men. Mean age was 48·7 years (SD 11·4). The proportion of participants with a humoral vaccine response at 4 weeks after the second dose was significantly higher in the vaccine group (48 [98%] of 49 participants) than the placebo group (none [0%] of 11 patients; p<0·0001). More patients in the vaccine group than placebo group reported injection site reactions (42 patients vs two patients), fever (ten vs none), and fatigue (26 vs two). There were no differences in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 and British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-flare rates between the groups. There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: The herpes zoster subunit vaccine induces humoral and cellular immunity against herpes zoster with a good safety profile in patients with SLE. A larger study is warranted to assess the efficacy of vaccines to prevent herpes zoster in patients with SLE. FUNDING: Ministry of Science and ICT, The Government of the Republic of Korea.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Vacunas de Subunidad , Humanos , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/inmunología , Femenino , Método Doble Ciego , Masculino , Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster/inmunología , Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster/administración & dosificación , Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster/efectos adversos , República de Corea/epidemiología , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vacunas de Subunidad/inmunología , Vacunas de Subunidad/administración & dosificación , Vacunas de Subunidad/efectos adversos , Vacunas de Subunidad/uso terapéutico , Herpes Zóster/prevención & control , Herpes Zóster/inmunología , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre
4.
J Med Virol ; 96(5): e29667, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38738524

RESUMEN

The effectiveness of herpes zoster (HZ) vaccines in patients with diabetes over the age of 50 remains an active area of research. Utilizing a real-world database from the US community, this study spanning from 2006 to 2023, aimed to evaluate the impact of HZ vaccination on newly diagnosed diabetes patients who received an HZ vaccination within 1 year of diagnosis. Exclusion criteria were established to omit patients with immune deficiencies. The cohort consisted of 53 885 patients, with an average age of 63.5 years, including 43% females and 58% whites. After implementing 1:1 propensity score matching for age, sex, race, comorbidities, diabetes medication, and hemoglobin A1c to ensure comparability, the study population was further stratified into four groups: N1 comparing any HZ vaccination to non-HZ vaccination (53 882 matched pairs), N2 for Shingrix versus non-HZ vaccination (16 665 matched pairs), N3 for Zostavax versus non-HZ vaccination (12 058 matched pairs), and N4 for Shingrix versus Zostavax (11 721 matched pairs). Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed a hazard ratio (HR) for HZ incidence post any HZ vaccination of 0.92 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83-1.01). Additional analyses yielded HRs of 1.12 (95% CI: 0.93-1.34) for Shingrix versus non-HZ vaccine, 1.02 (95% CI: 0.86-1.20) for Zostavax versus non-HZ vaccine, and 1.06 (95% CI: 0.87-1.29) for Shingrix versus Zostavax. Subgroup analyses across age, sex, and follow-up duration also showed no significant differences. These findings underscore the lack of a significant benefit from HZ vaccination in newly diagnosed diabetes patients aged over 50, highlighting the necessity for further prospective research.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster , Herpes Zóster , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster/inmunología , Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Herpes Zóster/prevención & control , Herpes Zóster/epidemiología , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Diabetes Mellitus , Eficacia de las Vacunas , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Herpesvirus Humano 3/inmunología
5.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2348839, 2024 Dec 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38804600

RESUMEN

In Singapore, population aging and rising life expectancy are increasing herpes zoster (HZ) burden, which may be reduced by vaccination. The present study modeled the public health impact of HZ vaccination in Singapore using ZOster ecoNomic Analysis (ZONA) model adapted with Singapore-specific key model inputs, where available. Base case analysis was conducted in adults ≥ 50 years of age (YOA), exploring three vaccination strategies (no vaccination, recombinant zoster vaccine [RZV], zoster vaccine live [ZVL]) under mass vaccination setting (30% coverage). Scenario and sensitivity analyses were performed. Out of 1.51 million adults in 2021 (base case population), 406,513 (27.0%) cases of HZ, 68,264 (4.5%) cases of post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN), and 54,949 (3.6%) cases of other complications were projected without vaccination. RZV was estimated to avoid 73,129 cases of HZ, 11,094 cases of PHN, and 9,205 cases of other complications over the subjects' remaining lifetime; ZVL would avoid 17,565 cases of HZ, 2,781 cases of PHN, and 1,834 cases of other complications. The number needed to vaccinate to prevent one case of HZ/PHN was lower for RZV (7/41) than ZVL (26/163). Among all five age-stratified cohorts (50-59/60-64/65-69/70-79/≥80 YOA), RZV (versus no vaccination/ZVL) avoided the largest number of cases in the youngest cohort, 50-59 YOA. Results were robust under scenario and sensitivity analyses. Mass vaccination with RZV is expected to greatly reduce the public health burden of HZ among Singapore individuals ≥ 50 YOA. Findings support value assessment and decision-making regarding public health vaccination strategies for HZ prevention in Singapore.


Risk of shingles (herpes zoster) increases with age, especially from 50 years. Shingles is a major public health concern in Singapore, given its rapidly aging population. Vaccination can prevent shingles and reduce its public health burden. Two shingles vaccines are available in Singapore: recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) since 2021, zoster vaccine live (ZVL) since 2008. To understand the value of preventing shingles via vaccination, this study assessed the public health impact of shingles vaccination. Three vaccination strategies (no vaccination, vaccination with RZV, vaccination with ZVL) were compared in 1.51 million Singapore adults aged 50 years and above. Without vaccination, public health burden of shingles would be high; an estimated 406,513 (27.0%) would have shingles, 68,264 (4.5%) would have shingles-related long-term nerve pain, 54,949 (3.6%) would have other shingles-related complications, and 17,762 (1.2%) would be hospitalized due to shingles. Shingles vaccination could reduce this public health burden: RZV avoided 73,129 cases of shingles, 11,094 cases of shingles-related long-term nerve pain, 9,205 cases of other shingles-related complications, and 2,827 hospitalizations due to shingles, which was 4­6 times that avoided with ZVL (shingles: 17,565; shingles-related long-term nerve pain: 2,781; other shingles-related complications: 1,834; hospitalizations due to shingles: 484). Shingles vaccination for adults aged 50 years and above, especially early vaccination from 50­59 years, could reduce its public health burden more than vaccination at later ages and contribute toward healthy aging, preventive care, and the Healthier SG initiative. Results support local public health value assessments and decision-making for shingles prevention.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster , Herpes Zóster , Salud Pública , Humanos , Singapur/epidemiología , Herpes Zóster/prevención & control , Herpes Zóster/epidemiología , Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster/administración & dosificación , Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster/inmunología , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neuralgia Posherpética/prevención & control , Neuralgia Posherpética/epidemiología , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunación Masiva/estadística & datos numéricos
6.
Med Arch ; 78(2): 95-99, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38566876

RESUMEN

Background: Herpes Zoster (HZ), also known as Shingles, is a commonly occurring infection especially among the elderly. It is due to the reactivation of the dormant virus in the sensory ends that were present since the primary infection with the virus. Objective: Our study aims at assessing the knowledge, attitudes practices beliefs and current barriers towards the Shingrix vaccine to fully understand where we stand and come up with proper recommendations to services these at-risk individuals and ultimately have a positive impact on the healthcare system. Methods: Questionnaire based cross sectional study using a translated version of a previously developed and tested questionnaire. Results: more than 8000 participants responded to the survey. The vast majority had chicken pox before and did hear about the vaccine from different sources. Most of the participants had minimal knowledge regarding the vaccine and were willing to take it regardless of some safety concerns. Conclusion: more efforts need to be conducted to enhance vaccine uptake in at risk populations in Saudi Arabia.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster , Herpes Zóster , Humanos , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Herpes Zóster/prevención & control , Herpesvirus Humano 3 , Vacunación
7.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 438, 2024 Apr 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38658871

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Herpes Zoster is an age dependent disease and as such it represents a problem in the Italian social context, where the demographic curve is characterized by an overrepresentation of the elderly population. Vaccines against Herpes Zoster are available, safe and effective, however coverage remains sub-optimal. This study was therefore conducted to examine the variations in Herpes Zoster vaccine uptake and confidence across different regions in Italy. METHODS: This study utilized a cross-sectional computer-assisted web interview (CAWI) methodology. The survey was conducted by Dynata, an online panel provider, and involved 10,000 respondents recruited in Italy between April 11 and May 29, 2022. The sample was stratified based on geographic region, gender, and age group. Data management adhered to European Union data protection regulations, and the survey covered demographics, living conditions, and vaccination against herpes zoster (HZ), following the BeSD framework. RESULTS: The findings indicate regional disparities in herpes zoster vaccine uptake across Italy. Notably, the Islands region exhibits a particularly low vaccination rate (2.9%), highlighting the need for targeted interventions. The multivariate regression analysis showed that sociodemographic factors, limited access to healthcare services, and inadequate awareness of vaccine eligibility contribute to the lower uptake observed in this region. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this research emphasizes regional disparities in herpes zoster (HZ) vaccination uptake in Italy. Demographic, socioeconomic, and geographic factors impact individuals' willingness to receive the vaccine. The study highlights the importance of awareness of vaccine eligibility and accessible vaccination facilities in increasing uptake rates.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster , Herpes Zóster , Cobertura de Vacunación , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Masculino , Femenino , Herpes Zóster/prevención & control , Herpes Zóster/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Adulto , Cobertura de Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Anciano de 80 o más Años
8.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2341456, 2024 12 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38650460

RESUMEN

Few papers focus their attention on VZV vaccination effectiveness among people living with HIV (PLWH). Flanking the live attenuated vaccine (VZL) available, a newly recombinant vaccine (RZV) was recently introduced and approved for HZ prevention among adults. PLWH represents a population on which a particular attention should be applied, in order to guarantee the vaccine efficacy and safety. We performed a literature search in USNLM, PubMed, PubMed Central, PMC and Cochrane Library. From all the publications found eligible, data were extracted and processed per population, vaccine type, immunogenicity and ADRs. The review of the 13 included studies shows that both RZV and VZL are immunogenic and have an acceptable safety profile in adults and children living with HIV. However, given the lack of research available about vaccine efficacy in preventing VZV and HZ in PLWH, additional studies need to be performed, in order to achieve a full completeness of data.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster , Herpes Zóster , Vacunas Atenuadas , Vacunas Sintéticas , Humanos , Vacunas Atenuadas/inmunología , Vacunas Atenuadas/efectos adversos , Vacunas Atenuadas/administración & dosificación , Infecciones por VIH/inmunología , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster/inmunología , Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster/efectos adversos , Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Sintéticas/inmunología , Vacunas Sintéticas/efectos adversos , Vacunas Sintéticas/administración & dosificación , Herpes Zóster/prevención & control , Herpes Zóster/inmunología , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/inmunología , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/efectos adversos , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/administración & dosificación , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , Eficacia de las Vacunas , Herpesvirus Humano 3/inmunología , Adulto , Niño , Vacunación , Vacuna contra la Varicela/inmunología , Vacuna contra la Varicela/administración & dosificación , Vacuna contra la Varicela/efectos adversos
9.
Clin Drug Investig ; 44(5): 293-301, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38662318

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) is approved in adults for the prevention of herpes zoster. The effect of RZV in moderating the severity of breakthrough cases of herpes zoster has been noted but not explicitly quantified before. In this study, a meta-analysis was undertaken to estimate differential utility losses between unvaccinated (Placebo) and vaccinated (RZV) subjects in breakthrough cases of herpes zoster from three RZV clinical trials. METHODS: Differential utility losses between the two groups were estimated in units of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), leveraging aggregate patient data from the ZOE-50 (NCT01165177), ZOE-70 (NCT01165229), and ZOE-HSCT (NCT01610414) clinical trials. Differential utility losses and the ratio of mean utility losses were analyzed using random-effects and fixed-effects meta-regression models. RESULTS: The mean QALY loss differences between the unvaccinated (Placebo) and vaccinated (RZV) groups were 0.008, 0.004, and 0.011 in the ZOE-50, ZOE-70, and ZOE-HSCT studies, respectively, yielding an overall estimated difference of 0.007 (95% confidence interval 0.002-0.012) QALYs. Quality-adjusted life-year loss in the vaccinated group was estimated to be 35.5% of the value in the placebo group. A sensitivity analysis estimated an overall difference of 0.005 (95% confidence interval 0.001-0.009) QALYs, corresponding to 48.6% of the QALY loss value in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Recombinant zoster vaccine is effective in alleviating disease severity in breakthrough cases of herpes zoster. The results may be useful in distinguishing QALY losses between vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts in health economics studies, particularly cost-effectiveness analyses.


Herpes zoster, also known as shingles, may cause painful rashes and persistent pain for months or even years after the initial episode. Recombinant zoster vaccine is approved for the prevention of shingles. Pivotal recombinant zoster vaccine clinical trials have reported data about the impact of shingles episodes on daily activities and overall health-related quality of life. In this work, we combined data from three recombinant zoster vaccine clinical trials and compared the loss in quality of life­measured in quality-adjusted life-years­incurred by vaccinated and unvaccinated subjects who experienced a shingles episode. We found that vaccinated patients experienced lower quality-adjusted life-year losses when they developed shingles compared with unvaccinated patients. Our results may be useful in assessing quality-adjusted life-year losses between vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts in future herpes zoster vaccination health economics analyses.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster , Herpes Zóster , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Herpes Zóster/prevención & control , Herpes Zóster/inmunología , Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster/administración & dosificación , Vacunación/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto
10.
Vaccine ; 42(12): 2966-2974, 2024 Apr 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38582693

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Since 2021 a recombinant adjuvanted anti-Herpes Zoster vaccine(Recombinant Zoster Vaccine, RZV) is offered in Italy to high-risk patients. Few real-life data about RZV safety are available in target populations. OBJECTIVES: This study investigates Adverse Events Following Immunization(AEFIs), baseline disease flare-ups, and Herpes Zoster (HZ) episodes occurring after RZV administration in a heterogeneous population of fragile patients to design its safety profile. METHODS: This is a retrospective population-based study. RZV-vaccinated patients at Bari Policlinico General Hospital vaccination clinic from October 1st, 2021, to March 31st, 2023, were enrolled. Subjects were screened for reason of RZV eligibility and baseline chronic pathologies. AEFIs occurred in the first 7-days post-vaccination period were collected, and baseline disease flare-ups and post-vaccination HZ episodes were assessed via a 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: Five-hundred-thirty-eight patients were included and total of 1,031 doses were administered. Most patients were vaccinated due to ongoing immunosuppressive therapy(54.65 %); onco-hematological and cardiovascular conditions were the most common chronic baseline pathologies. Out of 1,031 follow-ups, 441 AEFI cases were reported(42.7/100). The most common symptoms were injection site pain/itching(35.60/100), asthenia/malaise(11.44/100), and fever (10.09/100). Four serious AEFIs occurred(0.38/100). Older age, male sex, and history of cardiovascular diseases(OR:0.71; 95CI:0.52-0.98; p-value <0.05) were found to decrease AEFIs risk, while endocrine-metabolic illnesses(OR:1.61; 95CI:1.15-2.26; p-value <0.05) increased it. Twelve patients(2.23 %) reported a flare-up/worsening of their baseline chronic condition within the first three months after vaccination(mean interval 31.75 days, range 0-68 days). Patients with rheumatological illnesses had a higher risk of relapse(OR:16.56; 95CI:3.58-76.56; p-value <0.001), while male sex behaved as a protective factor. Twelve patients who completed the vaccination cycle(2.43%) had at least one HZ episode by the long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates RZV safety in a significant number of high-risk patients. Hence, RZV should be actively offered as part of tailored vaccination programs to decrease the burden of HZ in fragile populations.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster , Herpes Zóster , Humanos , Masculino , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Herpes Zóster/epidemiología , Herpes Zóster/prevención & control , Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster/efectos adversos , Herpesvirus Humano 3 , Dolor/inducido químicamente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Brote de los Síntomas , Vacunas Sintéticas/efectos adversos , Espera Vigilante , Femenino , Anciano
11.
Vaccine ; 42(13): 3166-3171, 2024 May 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38677792

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Immunisation against herpes zoster is recommended for adults aged ≥ 50 years. Two vaccines, a live attenuated (ZVL, Zostavax®) and an adjuvant recombinant subunit (HZ/su, Shingrix®), are available in Australia. Immunisation guidelines are shifting their recommendations towards HZ/su because of higher efficacy in preventing herpes zoster and associated complications. However, there are limited post-marketing data comparing the safety profiles of these vaccines. METHODS: Data from SmartVax, an active surveillance system for monitoring adverse events following immunisation (AEFIs) utilised by > 450 clinics throughout Australia, were analysed. Data from patients aged ≥ 50 years, who received ZVL or HZ/su, from 1 June 2021 to 31 May 2022, at clinics that utilised SmartVax were included. The proportion of records where patients who reported any, local, and systemic AEFIs after receiving ZVL or HZ/su were compared using multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: Data from 10,392 immunisation records (n = 8341 ZVL; n = 2051 HZ/su) were included. The proportion of AEFIs reported was higher with HZ/su (41.9 % [any], 33.8 % [local], 25.2 % [systemic]) than with ZVL (8.7 % [any], 6.2 % [local], 3.5 % [systemic]). After controlling for demographic variables, HZ/su presented a 6-fold increase in the odds (OR 6.44; 95 %CI: 5.57-7.46) of a reported AEFI compared to ZVL. Only 59 (0.6 %) of vaccinations lead to medical attention being sought due to an AEFI. CONCLUSIONS: While rates of AEFIs was higher with HZ/su than ZVL, most AEFIs were mild and did not require medical attention. Our findings support the change in vaccine recommendations and the use of HZ/su in immunisation programs.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster , Herpes Zóster , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados , Humanos , Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster/efectos adversos , Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster/administración & dosificación , Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster/inmunología , Australia/epidemiología , Herpes Zóster/prevención & control , Herpes Zóster/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Vacunas Atenuadas/efectos adversos , Vacunas Atenuadas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Atenuadas/inmunología , Herpesvirus Humano 3/inmunología , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos
13.
Brain Behav ; 14(2): e3415, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38687552

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have reported a decreased risk of dementia with herpes zoster vaccination. Given this background, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the association between herpes zoster vaccination and the risk of dementia. METHODS: We searched five databases until November 2023 for case-control, cross-sectional, or cohort studies investigating the association of herpes zoster vaccination and dementia. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were pooled in the meta-analysis. Meta-regression, subgroup, and sensitivity analysis were also conducted. RESULTS: We evaluated a total of five studies (one cross-sectional, one case-control, and four cohort studies) that included a total number of 103,615 patients who were vaccinated with herpes zoster vaccine. All the studies were of high quality, ranging from 7 to 9. Due to the high heterogeneity (I2 = 100%, p < .00001) observed in our study, a random effect model was used for the analysis. The pooled odds ratio was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.50, 1.43), p (overall effect) = .53), indicating that herpes zoster vaccination reduces the risk of dementia. CONCLUSION: Herpes zoster vaccination is associated with a reduction of the risk of dementia. More epidemiological studies are needed to confirm the association.


Asunto(s)
Demencia , Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster , Herpes Zóster , Humanos , Demencia/epidemiología , Demencia/prevención & control , Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster/administración & dosificación , Herpes Zóster/prevención & control , Herpes Zóster/epidemiología , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos
15.
J Med Virol ; 96(5): e29629, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38682607

RESUMEN

To inform surveillance, prevention, and management strategies for the varicella zoster virus (VZV) during the COVID-19 pandemic, this study aimed to evaluate the risk of herpes zoster (HZ) occurrence/recurrence following COVID-19 infection and vaccination. A comprehensive search across seven databases was conducted up to January 31, 2024, to identify studies relevant to the occurrence of HZ following COVID-19 infection and vaccination. The meta-analysis included five studies on postinfection HZ and 13 studies on postvaccination HZ. Patients infected with COVID-19 had a 2.16-fold increased risk of HZ (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.24-3.76) than uninfected individuals. However, there was no significant association between COVID-19 vaccination and the risk of HZ compared to controls, with a relative risk (RR) of 1.08 (95% CI: 0.84-1.39). Furthermore, a descriptive analysis of 74 postinfection and 153 postvaccination HZ studies found no significant differences on gender or age (<50 and ≥50 years) following COVID-19 infection. Notably, 44.0% of the HZ cases postinfection appeared within the first week, with 69.5% resolving within 10 days, predominantly presenting as skin lesions. In the postvaccination group, the majority (60.1%) developed HZ after the first dose and 66.7% occurred within 1 week. Moreover, 44.6% resolved within 10 days and 50.0% within a month, primarily exhibiting skin lesions and postherpetic neuralgia. The study found that COVID-19 infection increases the risk of HZ, but the COVID-19 vaccine does not. Further study is needed to explore the association between COVID-19 and HZ.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Herpes Zóster , Recurrencia , Vacunación , Humanos , Herpes Zóster/epidemiología , Herpes Zóster/prevención & control , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Herpesvirus Humano 3/inmunología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino
16.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2327145, 2024 Dec 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38488143

RESUMEN

We evaluated the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of two doses of recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) against herpes zoster (HZ) and postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) in Chinese adults at Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC). Chinese KPSC members were identified based on self-reported ethnicity or self-reported preferred spoken/written language. Those aged ≥50 years who received two doses of RZV 4 weeks to ≤ 6 months apart were matched 1:4 to RZV unvaccinated Chinese members and followed through June 2022; second doses were accrued 6/1/2018-12/31/2020. We estimated incidence and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing outcomes (HZ and PHN). Adjusted VE (%) was calculated as (1-aHR)×100. 3978 RZV vaccinated Chinese members were matched to 15,912 RZV unvaccinated Chinese members. The incidence per 1000 person-years (95% CI) of HZ in the vaccinated group was 1.5 (0.9-2.5) and 10.9 (9.8-12.1) in the unvaccinated group; aHR (95% CI) was 0.12 (0.07-0.21). Adjusted VE (95% CI) was 87.6% (78.9-92.7) against HZ. We identified 0 PHN cases in the vaccinated group and 19 in the unvaccinated group. Among Chinese adults aged ≥50 years, two doses of RZV provided substantial protection against HZ and PHN supporting the real-world effectiveness of the vaccine in this population.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster , Herpes Zóster , Neuralgia Posherpética , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Herpes Zóster/epidemiología , Herpes Zóster/prevención & control , Neuralgia Posherpética/epidemiología , Neuralgia Posherpética/prevención & control , Herpesvirus Humano 3 , Vacunas Sintéticas , China/epidemiología
17.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2317595, 2024 Dec 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38502342

RESUMEN

This qualitative, cross-sectional study aimed to understand the barriers and facilitators related to the adherence and completion of the recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) two-dose series in Canada, as perceived by healthcare providers (HCPs) and patients. Data collection occurred via 60-minute concept elicitation interviews with 12 HCPs (4 physicians, 2 nurse practitioners, 6 pharmacists) who had prescribed and/or administered RZV in Canada, and 21 patients aged ≥50 years who had received ≥1 dose of RZV. Patients were categorized as adherent (received both doses within the recommended 2-to-6-month timeframe; n = 11) or non-adherent (received only one dose or second dose outside the recommended timeframe; n = 10). Interview transcripts were coded and analyzed using a two-part thematic analysis approach. HCP-identified barriers to RZV adherence included high out-of-pocket cost, inconsistent/lack of health plan coverage, inconvenient processes for accessing RZV, and patient forgetfulness. HCP-identified facilitators included desire for shingles protection, HCP encouragement, and reminders. Barriers to RZV adherence identified by patients included lack of HCP knowledge/experience with RZV, receiving unreliable/confusing information, having unpleasant/severe side effects following the first dose, high out-of-pocket cost, lack of insurance coverage, and forgetfulness. Patient-identified facilitators included self-motivation, financial support, convenient processes for obtaining RZV, and reminders. In conclusion, many factors can influence RZV series completion and adherence among adults in Canada, including cost, insurance coverage, HCP knowledge and encouragement, and reminders. Awareness of these factors may inform HCPs in helping patients overcome barriers and identify opportunities for future consideration, facilitating protection against herpes zoster.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster , Herpes Zóster , Adulto , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Herpes Zóster/prevención & control , Herpesvirus Humano 3 , Vacunas Sintéticas , Personal de Salud , Canadá
18.
Vaccine ; 42(11): 2927-2932, 2024 Apr 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38548526

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The introduction of varicella vaccines into routine pediatric immunization programs has led to a considerable reduction in varicella incidence. However, there have been reports of varicella, herpes zoster, and meningitis caused by the vaccine strain of varicella-zoster virus (VZV), raising concerns. Establishing the relationship between the wild-type and vaccine strains in VZV infections among previously vaccinated individuals is crucial. Differences in the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) among vaccine strains can be utilized to identify the strain. In this study, we employed nanopore sequencing to identify VZV strains and analyzed clinical samples. METHODS: We retrospectively examined vesicle and cerebrospinal fluid samples from patients with VZV infections. One sample each of the wild-type and vaccine strains, previously identified using allelic discrimination real-time PCR and direct sequencing, served as controls. Ten samples with undetermined VZV strains were included. After DNA extraction, a long PCR targeting the VZV ORF62 region was executed. Nanopore sequencing identified SNPs, allowing discrimination between the vaccine and wild-type strains. RESULTS: Nanopore sequencing confirmed SNPs at previously reported sites (105,705, 106,262, 107,136, and 107,252), aiding in distinguishing between wild-type and vaccine strains. Among the ten unknown samples, nine were characterized as wild strains and one as a vaccine strain. Even in samples with low VZV DNA levels, nanopore sequencing was effective in strain identification. CONCLUSION: This study validates that nanopore sequencing is a reliable method for differentiating between the wild-type and vaccine strains of VZV. Its ability to produce long-read sequences is remarkable, allowing simultaneous confirmation of known SNPs and the detection of new mutations. Nanopore sequencing can serve as a valuable tool for the swift and precise identification of wild-type and vaccine strains and has potential applications in future VZV surveillance.


Asunto(s)
Varicela , Herpes Zóster , Secuenciación de Nanoporos , Humanos , Niño , Herpesvirus Humano 3/genética , Estudios Retrospectivos , Polimorfismo de Longitud del Fragmento de Restricción , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/métodos , Vacuna contra la Varicela/genética , Herpes Zóster/prevención & control , ADN Viral/genética
19.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2328955, 2024 Dec 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38517089

RESUMEN

Varicella vaccine was first licensed in Japan and South Korea in 1989 for use in healthy children and was introduced in US in 1995. So far, 29 countries have adopted varicella vaccine in their universal immunization program (UIP). No Asian country, India included, has adopted the varicella vaccine as part of their UIP. The extra-cutaneous sites for VZV diseases are central nervous system and gastrointestinal tract, the expanded disease spectrum includes vasculopathy, myelitis, inflammatory bowel disease, perforated ulcers, and gastritis. The actual disease burden of varicella is not known as most of the infected individuals may not visit the physician. The amplifiable VZV DNA will not always be detectable in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples in protracted illnesses such as vasculopathies, but demonstrable anti-VZV IgG in CSF has diagnostic value. The World Health Organization (WHO) position paper 2014 recommends two doses of varicella and zoster vaccines in targeted population. In India, varicella vaccine is not included in the UIP due to the cost and the belief that lifelong immunity occurs following primary infection. The expanded spectrum of VZV disease and the mounting body of evidence, however, suggest the need for both varicella and zoster vaccines in routine immunization schedule.


Asunto(s)
Varicela , Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster , Herpes Zóster , Niño , Humanos , Varicela/epidemiología , Varicela/prevención & control , Herpes Zóster/prevención & control , Vacuna contra la Varicela , Herpesvirus Humano 3 , Vacunación , Vacunas Atenuadas , India/epidemiología
20.
Exp Gerontol ; 190: 112411, 2024 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38548241

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Diverse pathogens (viral, bacterial, fungal) have been associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related traits in various studies. This suggests that compromised immunity, rather than specific microbes, may play a role in AD by increasing an individual's vulnerability to various infections, which could contribute to neurodegeneration. If true, then vaccines that have heterologous effects on immunity, extending beyond protection against the targeted disease, may hold a potential for AD prevention. METHODS: We evaluated the associations of common adult infections (herpes simplex, zoster (shingles), pneumonia, and recurrent mycoses), and vaccinations against shingles and pneumonia, with the risks of AD and other dementias in a pseudorandomized sample of the Health and Retirement Study (HRS). RESULTS: Shingles, pneumonia and mycoses, diagnosed between ages 65 and 75, were all associated with significantly increased risk of AD later in life, by 16 %-42 %. Pneumococcal and shingles vaccines administered between ages 65-75 were both associated with a significantly lower risk of AD, by 15 %-21 %. These effects became less pronounced when AD was combined with other dementias. DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest that both the pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine and the live attenuated zoster vaccine can offer significant protection against AD. It remains to be determined if non-live shingles vaccine has a similar beneficial effect on AD. This study also found significant associations of various infections with the risk of AD, but not with the risks of other dementias. This indicates that vulnerability to infections may play a more significant role in AD than in other types of dementia, which warrants further investigation.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer , Humanos , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/inmunología , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/prevención & control , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , Herpes Zóster/prevención & control , Herpes Zóster/inmunología , Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster/inmunología , Neumonía/prevención & control , Neumonía/inmunología , Neumonía/microbiología , Micosis/prevención & control , Micosis/inmunología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Vacunas Neumococicas/inmunología , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA