Detalles de la búsqueda
1.
Five-year clinical outcomes and intracoronary imaging findings of the COMFORTABLE AMI trial: randomized comparison of biodegradable polymer-based biolimus-eluting stents with bare-metal stents in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Eur Heart J
; 40(24): 1909-1919, 2019 06 21.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30851032
2.
Ultrathin-strut, biodegradable-polymer, sirolimus-eluting stents versus thin-strut, durable-polymer, everolimus-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary revascularisation: 5-year outcomes of the BIOSCIENCE randomised trial.
Lancet
; 392(10149): 737-746, 2018 09 01.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30170848
3.
Ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent for percutaneous coronary revascularisation (BIOSCIENCE): a randomised, single-blind, non-inferiority trial.
Lancet
; 384(9960): 2111-22, 2014 Dec 13.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25189359
4.
Effect of biolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer vs bare-metal stents on cardiovascular events among patients with acute myocardial infarction: the COMFORTABLE AMI randomized trial.
JAMA
; 308(8): 777-87, 2012 Aug 22.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22910755
5.
Five-Year Outcomes With Biodegradable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Subgroup Analysis of the BIOSCIENCE Trial.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med
; 34: 3-10, 2022 01.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33653633
6.
Five-Year Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Treated With Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents.
J Am Heart Assoc
; 8(22): e013607, 2019 11 19.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31696762
7.
Impact of Patient and Lesion Complexity on Long-Term Outcomes Following Coronary Revascularization With New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents.
Am J Cardiol
; 119(4): 501-507, 2017 02 15.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27923461
8.
Randomized comparison of a titanium-nitride-oxide-coated stent with a stainless steel stent for coronary revascularization: the TiNOX trial.
Circulation
; 111(20): 2617-22, 2005 May 24.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15883209
9.
A randomized comparison of novel bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent and durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent in patients with acute coronary syndromes: The CENTURY II high risk ACS substudy.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med
; 17(6): 355-61, 2016 Sep.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27156201
10.
Clinical outcomes according to diabetic status in patients treated with biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents: prespecified subgroup analysis of the BIOSCIENCE trial.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv
; 8(6)2015 Jun.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26043895
11.
Biolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer versus bare-metal stents in acute myocardial infarction: two-year clinical results of the COMFORTABLE AMI trial.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv
; 7(3): 355-64, 2014 Jun.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24847017
12.
Comparison of biolimus eluted from an erodible stent coating with bare metal stents in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (COMFORTABLE AMI trial): rationale and design.
EuroIntervention
; 7(12): 1435-43, 2012 Apr.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22301368
13.
Biodegradable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the 2-Year Follow-Up of the BIOSCIENCE Trial.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv
; 9(9): 981-3, 2016 05 09.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27151616
Resultados
1 -
13
de 13
1
Próxima >
>>