External applicability of SGLT2 inhibitor cardiovascular outcome trials to patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

BACKGROUND: Recent treatment guidelines support the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease based on the results of cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs). Applicability of these trials to everyday patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease is however unknown. The aim of this study is to assess the external applicability of SGLT2i CVOTs in daily clinical practice type 2 diabetes patients with established cardiovascular disease. METHODS: Trial in- and exclusion criteria from EMPA-REG OUTCOME, CANVAS, DECLARE-TIMI 58 and VERTIS-CV were applied to 1389 type 2 diabetes patients with cardiovascular disease in the Utrecht Cardiovascular Cohort-Secondary Manifestations of ARTerial disease (UCC-SMART). To evaluate the difference in cardiovascular risk (MACE) and all-cause mortality between trial eligible and ineligible patients, age and sex-adjusted Cox-regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: After applying trial in- and exclusion criteria, 48% of UCC-SMART patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease would have been eligible for DECLARE-TIMI 58, 35% for CANVAS, 29% for EMPA-REG OUTCOME and 21% for VERTIS-CV. Without the eligibility criteria of HbA1c, eligibility was 58-88%. For all trials the observed risk for cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality was similar in eligible and ineligible patients after adjustment for age and gender. CONCLUSION: A large proportion of patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease in daily clinical practice would have been eligible for participation in the SGLT2i CVOTs. Trial eligible and ineligible patients have the same risk for MACE and all-cause mortality.

Diagnostic markers for CNS lymphoma in blood and cerebrospinal fluid: a systematic review.

Diagnosing central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma remains a challenge. Most patients have to undergo brain biopsy to obtain tissue for diagnosis, with associated risks of serious complications. Diagnostic markers in blood or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) could facilitate early diagnosis with low complication rates. We performed a systematic literature search for studies on markers in blood or cerebrospinal fluid for the diagnosis CNS lymphoma and assessed the methodological quality of studies with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool (QUADAS-2). We evaluated diagnostic value of the markers at a given threshold, as well as differences between mean or median levels in patients versus control groups. Twenty-five studies were included, reporting diagnostic value for 18 markers in CSF (microRNAs -21, -19b, and -92a, RNU2-1f, CXCL13, interleukins -6, -8, and -10, soluble interleukin-2-receptor, soluble CD19, soluble CD27, tumour necrosis factor-alfa, beta-2-microglobulin, antithrombin III, soluble transmembrane activator and calcium modulator and cyclophilin ligand interactor, soluble B cell maturation antigen, neopterin and osteopontin) and three markers in blood (microRNA-21 soluble CD27, and beta-2-microglobulin). All studies were at considerable risk of bias and there were concerns regarding the applicability of 15 studies. CXCL-13, beta-2-microglobulin and neopterin have the highest potential in diagnosing CNS lymphoma, but further study is still needed before they can be used in clinical practice.

Causal chemoprophylactic activity of cabamiquine against Plasmodium falciparum in a controlled human malaria infection: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: Cabamiquine is a novel antimalarial that inhibits Plasmodium falciparum translation elongation factor 2. We investigated the causal chemoprophylactic activity and dose-exposure-response relationship of single oral doses of cabamiquine following the direct venous inoculation (DVI) of P falciparum sporozoites in malaria-naive, healthy volunteers. METHODS: This was a phase 1b, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, adaptive, dose-finding, single-centre study performed in Leiden, Netherlands. Malaria-naive, healthy adults aged 18-45 years were divided into five cohorts and randomly assigned (3:1) to receive cabamiquine or placebo. Randomisation was done by an independent statistician using codes in a permuted block schedule with a block size of four. Participants, investigators, and study personnel were masked to treatment allocation. A single, oral dose regimen of cabamiquine (200, 100, 80, 60, or 30 mg) or matching placebo was administered either at 2 h (early liver-stage) or 96 h (late liver-stage) after DVI. The primary endpoints based on a per-protocol analysis set were the number of participants who developed parasitaemia within 28 days of DVI, time to parasitaemia, number of participants with documented parasite blood-stage growth, clinical symptoms of malaria, and exposure-efficacy modelling. The impact of cabamiquine on liver stages was evaluated indirectly by the appearance of parasitaemia in the blood. The Clopper-Pearson CI (nominal 95%) was used to express the protection rate. The secondary outcomes were safety and tolerability, assessed in those who had received DVI and were administered one dose of the study intervention. The trial was prospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04250363). FINDINGS: Between Feb 17, 2020 and April 29, 2021, 39 healthy participants were enrolled (early liver-stage: 30 mg [n=3], 60 mg [n=6], 80 mg [n=6], 100 mg [n=3], 200 mg [n=3], pooled placebo [n=6]; late liver-stage: 60 mg [n=3], 100 mg [n=3], 200 mg [n=3], pooled placebo [n=3]). A dose-dependent causal chemoprophylactic effect was observed, with four (67%) of six participants in the 60 mg, five (83%) of six participants in the 80 mg, and all three participants in the 100 and 200 mg cabamiquine dose groups protected from parasitaemia up to study day 28, whereas all participants in the pooled placebo and 30 mg cabamiquine dose group developed parasitaemia. A single, oral dose of 100 mg cabamiquine or higher provided 100% protection against parasitaemia when administered during early or late liver-stage malaria. The median time to parasitaemia in those with early liver-stage malaria was prolonged to 15, 22, and 24 days for the 30, 60, and 80 mg dose of cabamiquine, respectively, compared with 10 days for the pooled placebo. All participants with positive parasitaemia showed documented blood-stage parasite growth, apart from one participant in the pooled placebo group and one participant in the 30 mg cabamiquine group. Most participants did not exhibit any malaria symptoms in both the early and late liver-stage groups, and those reported were mild in severity. A positive dose-exposure-efficacy relationship was established across exposure metrics. The median maximum concentration time was 1-6 h, with a secondary peak observed between 6 h and 12 h in all cabamiquine dose groups (early liver-stage). All cabamiquine doses were safe and well tolerated. Overall, 26 (96%) of 27 participants in the early liver-stage group and ten (83·3%) of 12 participants in the late liver-stage group reported at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) with cabamiquine or placebo. Most TEAEs were of mild severity, transient, and resolved without sequelae. The most frequently reported cabamiquine-related TEAE was headache. No dose-related trends were observed in the incidence, severity, or causality of TEAEs. INTERPRETATION: The results from this study show that cabamiquine has a dose-dependent causal chemoprophylactic activity. Together with previously demonstrated activity against the blood stages combined with a half-life of more than 150 h, these results indicate that cabamiquine could be developed as a single-dose monthly regimen for malaria prevention. FUNDING: The healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.

Predictors of Outcomes in Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy following Hypothermia: A Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Prediction of neurodevelopmental outcome in infants with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy remains an important challenge. Various studies have shown that the predictive ability of different modalities changed after the introduction of therapeutic hypothermia. This paper reviews the diagnostic test accuracy of the different modalities that are being used to predict neurodevelopmental outcomes following therapeutic hypothermia. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed using Embase and PubMed. Two reviewers independently included eligible studies and extracted data. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies Tool. Meta-analyses were performed where possible. RESULTS: Forty-seven articles and 3 conference abstracts were included, reporting on 3,072infants of whom 39% died or had an adverse neurodevelopmental outcome. A meta-analysis could be performed using 37 articles on (amplitude-integrated) electroencephalography (EEG), conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS). Amplitude-integrated EEG (aEEG) at 24 and 72 h showed similar high diagnostic OR, while aEEG at 6 h and EEG performed less, both due to a low specificity. For MRI, most studies reported scoring systems in which early (<8 days) MRI performed better than late (≥8 days) MRI. Injury to the posterior limb of the internal capsule on MRI or to the thalami on DWI were strong individual predictors, as was an increased lactate/N-acetylaspartate peak on 1H-MRS. CONCLUSIONS: In the era of therapeutic hypothermia, the different modalities remain good predictors of neurodevelopmental outcome. However, timing should be taken into account. aEEG may initially be false positive and gets more reliable after 24 h. In contrast, MRI should be used during the first week, as its predictive value decreases afterwards.