Impact of treatment interval between neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy and surgery in lung squamous cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The optimal timing for surgery following neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy for lung squamous cell carcinoma appears to be a topic of limited data. Many clinical studies lack stringent guidelines regarding this timing. The objective of this study is to explore the effect of the interval between neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy and surgery on survival outcomes in patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS: This study conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma who underwent neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy between January 2019 and October 2022 at The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine. Patients were divided into two groups based on the treatment interval: ≤33 days and > 33 days. The primary observational endpoints of the study were Disease-Free Survival (DFS) and Overall Survival (OS). Secondary observational endpoints included Objective response rate (ORR), Major Pathological Response (MPR), and Pathological Complete Remission (pCR). RESULTS: Using the Kaplan-Meier methods, the ≤ 33d group demonstrated a superior DFS curve compared to the > 33d group (p = 0.0015). The median DFS for the two groups was 952 days and 590 days, respectively. There was no statistical difference in the OS curves between the groups (p = 0.66), and the median OS was not reached for either group. The treatment interval did not influence the pathologic response of the tumor or lymph nodes. CONCLUSIONS: The study observed that shorter treatment intervals were associated with improved DFS, without influencing OS, pathologic response, or surgical safety. Patients should avoid having a prolonged treatment interval between neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy and surgery.

Tumor micronecrosis predicts poor prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Tumor micronecrosis is a histopathological feature predicting poor prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who underwent liver resection. However, the role of tumor micronecrosis in liver transplantation remains unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with HCC who underwent liver transplantation between January 2015 and December 2021 at our center. We then classified them into micronecrosis(-) and micronecrosis(+) groups and compared their recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). We identified independent prognostic factors using Cox regression analysis and calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to evaluate the predictive value of RFS for patients with HCC after liver transplantation. RESULTS: A total of 370 cases with evaluable histological sections were included. Patients of the micronecrosis(+) group had a significantly shorter RFS than those of the micronecrosis(-) group (P = 0.037). Shorter RFS and OS were observed in micronecrosis(+) patients without bridging treatments before liver transplantation (P = 0.002 and P = 0.007), while no differences were detected in those with preoperative antitumor therapies that could cause iatrogenic tumor necrosis. Tumor micronecrosis improved the AUC of Milan criteria (0.77-0.79), the model for end-stage liver disease score (0.70-0.76), and serum alpha-fetoprotein (0.63-0.71) for the prediction of prognosis after liver transplantation. CONCLUSION: Patients with HCC with tumor micronecrosis suffer from a worse prognosis than those without this feature. Tumor micronecrosis can help predict RFS after liver transplantation. Therefore, patients with HCC with tumor micronecrosis should be treated with adjuvant therapy and closely followed after liver transplantation. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: Not Applicable.

Real-world efficiency of lenvatinib plus PD-1 blockades in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: an exploration for expanded indications.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency and prognostic factors of lenvatinib plus programmed death 1 (PD-1) blockades in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), especially for those with tumor occupation ≥50% volume of liver (TO ≥50%) or invasion in Vp4, who were excluded from the trial KEYNOTE-524. METHODS: We reviewed the clinical data of patients with unresectable HCC who received lenvatinib plus PD-1 blockades. The Kaplan-Meier method was performed to compare the progression-free survival (PFS) and the overall survival (OS). Cox proportional hazards model was adopted to identify independent prognostic factors. RESULTS: The median PFS and OS of the enrolled 84 HCC patients (31 patients with TO ≥50% and 30 patients with Vp4 invasion) were 6.6 and 11.4 months respectively. TO ≥50% had significantly negative impact on the objective response rates (ORR) (p = 0.015). HCC patients with TO ≥50% had significantly worse PFS and OS than those with TO < 50% (both p value < 0.001). Conversely, invasion in Vp4 did not significantly affect the ORR, PFS or OS for HCC patients receiving lenvatinib plus PD-1 blockades (p = 0.419, 0.528 and 0.855). After multivariate analyses, TO ≥50% was the independent predictor for PFS and OS (both p value < 0.001). No significant correlation was found between any kind of AEs and TO ≥50% or invasion in Vp4. CONCLUSION: Lenvatinib plus PD-1 blockades can provide survival benefits for HCC patients with invasion in Vp4 and the indications of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab may be further expanded. Locoregional treatments should be considered for patients with TO ≥50% during systemic therapy.

Reductions in AFP and PIVKA-II can predict the efficiency of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in HCC patients.

BACKGROUND: Few biomarkers can predict the efficiency of PD-1 blockade in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to investigate the prognostic role of AFP and PIVKA-II in HCC patients receiving anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. METHODS: A total of 235 HCC patients treated with PD-1 blockade were enrolled. Serum AFP and PIVKA-II levels were collected before and after treatments. The patients were divided into groups based on the reduction in AFP and PIVKA-II: AFP reduction ≤50% vs AFP reduction > 50% and PIVKA-II reduction ≤50% vs PIVKA-II reduction > 50%. The primary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Binary logistic regression analyses were used to explore the related factors of ORR. A Cox proportional hazards model was employed to identify the potential prognostic factors of PFS and OS. RESULTS: Among all the patients, 34.9% (82/235) achieved a complete or partial response. There was a positive correlation between AFP reduction > 50% or PIVKA-II reduction> 50% and the ORR of PD-1 blockade (P < 0.001 and = 0.003). PFS was significantly improved in patients with AFP reduction > 50% and PIVKA-II reduction > 50% (p < 0.001 and = 0.021). In addition, AFP reduction > 50% and PIVKA-II reduction> 50% were positively correlated with longer OS (p = 0.003 and 0.006). CONCLUSION: Early reductions in AFP and PIVKA-II can be predictors of the efficacy of PD-1 blockade in HCC patients.

Effect of prior cancer on survival of hepatocellular carcinoma: implications for clinical trial eligibility criteria.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer history are usually excluded from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) clinical trials. However, whether previous malignancy affects the oncological outcomes of HCC patients has not been fully assessed. This study aimed to evaluate whether prior cancer compromised the survival of HCC patients. METHODS: Patients with HCC were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2004 and 2015, and then they were classified into groups with and without prior cancer. The Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression analysis were adopted to evaluate whether prior cancer impacted clinical outcomes after propensity score matching (PSM) adjusting baseline differences. Validation was performed in the cohort from our institution. RESULTS: We identified 2642 HCC patients with prior cancer. After PSM, the median overall survival (OS) time were 14.5 and 12.0 months respectively for groups with and without prior cancer. Prior cancer did not compromise prognosis in patients with HCC (p = 0.49). The same tendency was found in subgroups stratified by tumor stages and cancer interval period: OS was similar between groups with and without prior cancer (both p values> 0.1). In the multivariate Cox regression model, prior cancer did not adversely impact patients' survival (HR: 1.024; 95% CI: 0.961-1.092). In the validation cohort from our institution, prior cancer had no significant association with worse outcomes (p = 0.48). CONCLUSION: For HCC patients, prior cancer did not compromise their survival, regardless of tumor stage and cancer interval period. Exclusion criteria for HCC clinical trials could be reconsidered.

The guiding value of microvascular invasion for treating early recurrent small hepatocellular carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with microvascular invasion (MVI) have worse survival. Whether the presence of MVI indicates the necessity of more aggressive locoregional treatments for recurrences remains to be elucidated. METHODS: We reviewed patients who underwent curative hepatectomy for primary HCC in our institution, and 379 patients with recurrent HCC up to three nodules smaller than 3 cm were enrolled. The Kaplan-Meier method was adopted to compare the secondary recurrence-free survival (sRFS) and post-recurrence survival (PRS) among patients undergoing hepatectomy, RFA and transarterial chemoembolization plus RFA (TACE-RFA). Cox regression analyses were performed to identify independent prognostic factors. RESULTS: Both the sRFS and PRS of the MVI (-) group were significantly longer than those of the MVI (+) group (p = 0.001 and 0.011). For patients with MVI (-), no significant difference was found in sRFS or PRS among recurrent HCC patients receiving hepatectomy, RFA or TACE-RFA (p = 0.149 and 0.821). A similar trend was found in patients with MVI (+) (p = 0.851 and 0.960). Further analysis found that TACE-RFA provided better sRFS than hepatectomy or RFA alone in patients with MVI (+) and early recurrence within two years (p = 0.036 and 0.044). CONCLUSION: For HCC patients with MVI (+) and early small recurrence, TACE-RFA could achieve better prognosis than hepatectomy or RFA alone, while RFA alone provided comparable survival benefits compared with hepatectomy or TACE-RFA in other HCC patients with small recurrence.

Survival benefits of computed tomography-guided thermal ablation for adrenal metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma.

Purpose: To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and survival outcomes of computed tomography (CT)-guided thermal ablation for adrenal metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: This long-term retrospective study included 27 male patients (median age, 50 years; range, 34-77 years) with 29 adrenal metastatic tumors associated with HCC who underwent ablation between January 2004 and December 2015. The technical success rate, effectiveness rate, complications, and survival were recorded. Complications were assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox regression model was used for the evaluation of factors predicting survival. Results: A total of 33 ablation sessions were performed for the 29 tumors. No ablation-related death was observed, and the incidence of complications was 87.9%. Grade 1-2 complications occurred in 23 of the 33 sessions (69.7%), and grade 3 hypertension was the only major complication, occurring in eight sessions (24.2%). The technical success and effectiveness rates were 93.1% (27 of 29 tumors) and 92.6% (25 of 27 patients), respectively. The median progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) durations for the 27 patients were 6.9 months and 16.8 months, respectively. The median OS duration was longer for patients with adrenal oligometastases (21.8 months) than for those with (12.8 months) multiple metastases (p = .037). Adrenal oligometastases were the only significant predictor of OS (p = .043). Conclusions: CT-guided ablation is a feasible and safe procedure for adrenal metastases from HCC, and it may be more beneficial for patients with adrenal oligometastases.

The Optimal Management for Sub-Centimeter Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Curative Treatments or Follow-Up?

BACKGROUND The optimal strategy for dealing with sub-centimeter hepatic nodules has not yet been established. This study aimed to assess whether there was a need to provide curative treatments for sub-centimeter hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) to patients at risk for high false positives. MATERIAL AND METHODS We identified patients with primary pathologically diagnosed HCC ≤2 cm from 2004 to 2015 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. They were divided according to the interventions they received: local ablation, surgical resection, or liver transplantation. In each group, overall survival and cancer-specific survival were used as endpoints to compare the prognoses between patients with sub-centimeter HCC and patients with HCC measuring 1 to 2 cm by Kaplan-Meier. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce bias. We also compared the survival of patients with a primary solitary HCC based on interventions, in the different tumor size groups. Bootstrapping was performed to validate the findings. RESULTS Overall, 10.4% of patients (197 out of 1894) had HCCs <1 cm, and 89.6% of patients (1697 out of 1894) had HCCs in the 1 to 2 cm range. There was no significant difference in overall and cancer-specific survival between patients with HCCs <1 cm and those with HCCs in the 1 to 2 cm range, in all treatment groups. After adjusting confounding factors, no significant correlation was found between tumor size and survival time. In patients with HCCs measuring ≤2 cm, overall survival and cancer-specific survival were superior in liver transplantation compared with surgical resection and local ablation. Surgical resection provided better survival than local ablation. CONCLUSIONS Compared to patients with HCCs measuring 1 to 2 cm, the survival rates of patients with sub-centimeter HCCs was not improved through curative treatments, risking high false positives.

Optimal therapeutic strategy for non-small cell lung cancer with thoracic extrathoracic metastasis: a study based on SEER database.

Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with extrathoracic metastasis (EM) are a highly heterogeneous cohort. Some of these patients could benefit from primary tumor surgery. This study aimed to identify potential NSCLC patients with EM suitable for primary tumor resection and to determine the optimal therapeutic strategy. Methods: NSCLC patients with EM were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database between 2010 and 2015. They were stratified into subgroups with single and multi-EMs. Cox regression analysis was adopted to identify prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the OS among patients who received different treatment modalities. Results: The univariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that advanced age, male sex, race (black), married status, squamous cell carcinoma, higher histological grade, advanced T or N stage, contralateral lung metastasis, multi-EMs, tumor size >2 cm, and lack of treatment were associated with poorer OS in patients with NSCLC (P<0.05). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that the number of EM and treatment modalities were independent prognostic factors affecting OS (P<0.001). For patients with single EM, those who did not receive treatment and those who underwent single-agent chemotherapy, single-agent surgery, surgery combined with chemotherapy, surgery combined with radiotherapy, or surgery combined with chemoradiotherapy had median OS times of 3.0, 11.0, 12.0, 26.0, 11.0, and 25.0 months, respectively. Compared to monotherapy, combination therapy showed significant benefits for patients with single EM in NSCLC. Furthermore, patients with single EM who underwent lobectomy, bilobectomy, or pneumonectomy had significantly longer survival than those who underwent sublobar resection, even when the primary tumor size was ≤2 cm (P=0.04). Conclusions: Primary tumor surgery could benefit NSCLC patients with single EM; lobectomy was at least warranted to improve survival even for primary tumors with size ≤2 cm.

A Pathologically Friendly Strategy for Determining the Organ-specific Spatial Tumor Microenvironment Topology in Lung Adenocarcinoma Through the Integration of snRandom-seq and Imaging Mass Cytometry.

Heterogeneous organ-specific responses to immunotherapy exist in lung cancer. Dissecting tumor microenvironment (TME) can provide new insights into the mechanisms of divergent responses, the process of which remains poor, partly due to the challenges associated with single-cell profiling using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) materials. In this study, single-cell nuclei RNA sequencing and imaging mass cytometry (IMC) are used to dissect organ-specific cellular and spatial TME based on FFPE samples from paired primary lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and metastases. Single-cell analyses of 84 294 cells from sequencing and 250 600 cells from IMC reveal divergent organ-specific immune niches. For sites of LUAD responding well to immunotherapy, including primary LUAD and adrenal gland metastases, a significant enrichment of B, plasma, and T cells is detected. Spatially resolved maps reveal cellular neighborhoods recapitulating functional units of the tumor ecosystem and the spatial proximity of B and CD4+ T cells at immunogenic sites. Various organ-specific densities of tertiary lymphoid structures are observed. Immunosuppressive sites, including brain and liver metastases, are deposited with collagen I, and T cells at these sites highly express TIM-3. This study originally deciphers the single-cell landscape of the organ-specific TME at both cellular and spatial levels for LUAD, indicating the necessity for organ-specific treatment approaches.

A novel molecular subtyping based on multi-omics analysis for prognosis predicting in colorectal melanoma: A 16-year prospective multicentric study.

Colorectal melanoma (CRM) is a rare malignant tumor with severe complications, and there is currently a lack of systematic research. We conducted a study that combined proteomics and mutation data of CRM from a cohort of three centers over a 16-years period (2005-2021). The patients were divided into a training set consisting of two centers and a testing set comprising the other center. Unsupervised clustering was conducted on the training set to form two molecular subtypes for clinical characterization and functional analysis. The testing set was used to validate the survival differences between the two subtypes. The comprehensive analysis identified two subtypes of CRM: immune exhausted C1 cluster and DNA repair C2 cluster. The former subtype exhibited characteristics of metabolic disturbance, immune suppression, and poor prognosis, along with APC mutations. A machine learning algorithm named Support Vector Machine (SVM) was applied to predict the classification of CRM patients based on protein expression in the external testing cohort. Two subtypes of primary CRM with clinical and proteomic characteristics provides a reference for subsequent diagnosis and treatments.

Optimizing hepatocellular carcinoma disease staging systems by incorporating tumor micronecrosis: A multi-institutional retrospective study.

Tumor micronecrosis is a pathological feature that reflects malignant biological behavior in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, whether micronecrosis can optimize HCC staging systems remains unilluminated. A total of 1632 HCC patients who underwent curative hepatectomy in four institutions from January 2014 to December 2021 were enrolled in this study. Independent prognostic factors were identified, and optimized staging models were established using a training cohort (n = 934). The performance of optimized staging models was validated using an external cohort consisting of cases from three other institutions (n = 232). In addition, patients from our prospectively collected database (n = 379) tested the application effectiveness of the models. Harrel's c-statistics and the corrected Akaike information criterion (AICc) were used to assess the performance of staging models. In most of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) and tumor (T) stages, HCC patients with tumor micronecrosis showed poorer prognosis than those without. Tumor micronecrosis, microvascular invasion, multiple tumors and tumor size >2 cm were independent prognostic-related factors. The BCLC and T staging models incorporating tumor micronecrosis showed better performance than the original systems (c-statistic, 0.712 and 0.711 vs. 0.664 and 0.679; AICc, 2314.8 and 2322.3 vs. 2338.2 and 2338.1; respectively). Furthermore, the external validation cohort confirmed that the optimized staging models had improved efficiency compared with the original ones. Moreover, the prospective cohort demonstrated the applicability of the optimized staging systems. Tumor micronecrosis plays a stage-ascending role in HCC patients. The BCLC and T staging systems incorporating tumor micronecrosis can improve the prognosis stratification efficiency of patients.

Pathological complete response to neoadjuvant alectinib in unresectable anaplastic lymphoma kinase positive non-small cell lung cancer: A case report.

BACKGROUND: The development of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has remarkably improved the prognosis of patients with ALK-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Alectinib, the second-generation ALK-TKI, has been approved as first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients with ALK rearrangement. Neoadjuvant therapy can achieve tumor downstaging and eradicate occult lesions in patients with potentially resectable disease. Whether neoadjuvant alectinib can be a conversion therapy in ALK-positive advanced NSCLC patients remains unclear. CASE SUMMARY: A 41-year-old man was pathologically diagnosed with locally advanced ALK-positive stage IIIB NSCLC. Alectinib was prescribed to induce tumor downstaging and facilitate the subsequent surgical resection. The tumor was successfully downstaged and pathological complete response was achieved. Left upper lobectomy with mediastinal lymphadenectomy was performed after tumor downstaging. The patient has continued to receive alectinib as adjuvant therapy during postoperative follow-up with a recurrence-free survival of 29 mo as of writing this report. CONCLUSION: This case sheds light on the feasibility and safety of alectinib as a neoadjuvant treatment for stage IIIB NSCLC patients with ALK rearrangement. Its efficacy needs to be validated in prospective clinical trials.

Development and Validation of Novel Models Including Tumor Micronecrosis for Predicting the Postoperative Survival of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Background: The heterogeneity of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) leads to the unsatisfying predictive performance of current staging systems. HCC patients with pathological tumor micronecrosis have an immunosuppressive microenvironment. We aimed to develop novel prognostic models by integrating micronecrosis to predict the survival of HCC patients after hepatectomy more precisely. Methods: We enrolled 765 HCC patients receiving curative hepatic resection. They were randomly divided into a training cohort (n= 536) and a validation cohort (n = 229). We developed two prognostic models for postoperative recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) based on independent factors identified through multivariate Cox regression analyses. The predictive performance was assessed using the Harrell concordance index (C-index) and the time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, compared with six conventional staging systems. Results: The RFS and OS nomograms were developed based on tumor micronecrosis, tumor size, albumin-bilirubin grade, tumor number and prothrombin time. The C-indexes for the RFS nomogram and OS nomogram were respectively 0.66 (95% CI, 0.62-0.69) and 0.74 (95% CI, 0.69-0.79) in the training cohort, which was significantly better than those of the six common staging systems (0.52-0.61 for RFS and 0.53-0.63 for OS). The results were further confirmed in the validation group, with the C-indexes being 0.66 and 0.77 for the RFS and OS nomograms, respectively. Conclusion: The two nomograms could more accurately predict RFS and OS in HCC patients receiving curative hepatic resection, thereby aiding in formulating personalized postoperative follow-up plans.

Comparison of stereotactic body radiation therapy with hepatic resection and radiofrequency ablation as initial treatment in patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma.

Background: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a novel intervention for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The outcomes of SBRT, liver resection (LR), and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) as the initial treatment for AJCC stage I HCC patients remain unclear. Methods: Patients with AJCC stage I HCC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database were analyzed for survival rates using the Kaplan-Meier method and stratified according to tumor size: S subgroup (≤2 cm), M subgroup (>2-3 cm), and L subgroup (>3 cm). For factors including age, year of diagnosis, sex, race, grade, tumor size, AFP, and fibrosis score, propensity score matching was performed to eliminate the imbalance of baseline features and selection bias during groups. Results: A total of 4,002 patients were included; the difference in median overall survival (mOS) between the SBRT group and the LR or RFA group in the S subgroup was statistically insignificant (p=0.109 and p=0.744), while that of the RFA group was significantly worse than that of the LR group (p <0.001). In the M and L subgroups, the mOS of the SBRT group was worse than that of the RFA group (p=0.040 and p<0.001, respectively). The mOS of LR was the best when compared with either the SBRT or RFA group regardless of the subgroup M or L (all p<0.001). Conclusion: For HCC ≤ 2 cm, SBRT can be used as an alternative treatment for RFA. For patients with HCC larger than 2 cm, RFA can provide better long-term survival than SBRT, while LR remains the best choice.

Antiviral Treatments Eliminate the Adverse Impacts of High Baseline HBV Loads on the Survival of HBV-Related HCC Patients.

Background: In consideration of no standard exclusion criteria for hepatitis B virus (HBV) loads in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)-related clinical trials, this study aimed to investigate the prevalence of HBV-related exclusion criteria among current clinical trials and evaluate whether antiviral treatments could eliminate the adverse effects from high HBV loads for HCC patients. Methods: This is a retrospective study including 772 HCC clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov and 1784 HCC patients receiving antiviral treatment. The Kaplan-Meier (K-M) method was used to compare the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between different groups, and Cox regression analyses were performed to validate possible risk factors on PFS and overall survival OS. Results: Among 772 clinical trials, 58.3% did not adopt baseline HBV loads as exclusion criteria, 18.0% was 2000 IU/mL, and 10.5% was receiving antiviral therapy. We observed baseline HBV loads had no significant impact on PFS (p = 0.491, 0.155, 0.119, 0.788, 0.280, 0.683 respectively) and OS (p = 0.478, 0.741, 0.263, 0.039, 0.999, 0.581 respectively) in all patients or each treatment group including hepatectomy, radiofrequency ablation, interventional therapy, targeted drugs and anti-programmed cell death immunotherapy, except for the OS of interventional therapy group, where patients with high HBV loads had higher BCLC stage, serum AFP level and ALBI grade (p = 0.009, 0.015 and 0.003, respectively). Conclusion: Antiviral treatments could eliminate the adverse impacts of high HBV loads on the survival of HCC patients. Simplified eligibility criteria can be adopted for HCC patients with HBV infection where regular antiviral therapy should be enough.

Development and Validation of Prognostic Nomograms for Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Hepatectomy Based on Inflammatory Markers.

Background: The value of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) compared with other inflammation-based scores in predicting the outcomes of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients after curative resection remains unknown. This study aims to evaluate the predictive value of LDH and develop novel nomograms to predict postoperative recurrence and survival in these patients. Methods: This study retrospectively collected 1560 patients with HBV-related HCC who underwent curative resection from four institutions in China. In total, 924 patients were recruited from our center and randomly divided into the training cohort (n = 616) and internal validation (n = 308) cohorts. Additionally, 636 patients were selected from three other centers as the external validation cohort. The C index of inflammation-based scores was calculated and compared in the training cohort. Novel models were developed according to multivariable Cox regression analysis in the training cohort and validated in the internal and external validation cohorts. Results: LDH showed a higher C-index than other inflammation-based scores for recurrence survival (RFS, 0.60, 95% CI, 0.58-0.61) and overall survival (OS, 0.65, 95% CI, 0.63-0.68). The nomograms of RFS and OS were developed based on tumor diameter, macrovascular invasion, AFP, operative hemorrhage, tumor differentiation, tumor number and LDH and achieved a high C-index (0.78, 95% CI, 0.76-0.79 and 0.81, 95% CI, 0.79-0.83), which were remarkably higher than the C-indexes of the five conventional HCC staging systems (0.52-0.62 for RFS and 0.53-0.67 for OS). The nomograms were validated in the internal validation cohort (0.77 for RFS, 0.78 for OS) and external validation cohort (0.80 for RFS, 0.81 for OS) and performed well-fitted calibration curves. Conclusion: The two nomograms based on inflammatory markers achieved optimal prediction for RFS and OS of patients with HBV-related HCC after hepatectomy.

Comparison of the Prognostic Value of Inflammation-Based Scores in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Anti-PD-1 Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory response is related to cancer progression and patient survival. However, the value in predicting survival in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who received anti-PD-1 therapy has not been elucidated. This study aimed to compare the predictive ability of inflammation-based scores for the prognosis of HCC patients after anti-PD-1 therapy. METHODS: A total of 442 patients who received anti-PD-1 therapy were included in the study. Representative inflammation-based prognostic scores, including the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein (CRP) ratio (LCR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), systemic immune inflammation index (SII), CRP-to-albumin ratio (CAR), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS), and prognostic index (PI), were assessed for prediction accuracy using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and Harrell's concordance index (C-index) analyses. RESULTS: All the inflammation-based prognostic scores exhibited good discriminatory ability in overall survival (OS) (all P < 0.01), while the PNI score was a unique independent predictor for OS in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 1.770; confidence interval, 1.309-2.393; P < 0.001). The areas under the ROC curves at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months and the C-index (0.65) demonstrated that the predictive accuracy of the PNI score was superior to that of the other inflammation-based scores. CONCLUSION: The PNI score is a discriminatory prognostic indicator for OS in HCC patients with anti-PD-1 therapy and is superior to the other inflammation-based prognostic scores in terms of predictive ability.

Optimal subsequent treatments for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma resistant to anti-PD-1 treatment.

Aim: The subsequent treatments for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) resistant to immunotherapy remain unclear. This study aimed to identify optimal treatments for HCC patients with progression after anti-PD-1 therapy. Methods: The authors retrospectively analyzed 197 HCC patients with progressive disease after anti-PD-1 treatment. These patients were classified into initial resistant and secondary resistant groups. Results: In the initial resistant group, subsequent treatment with PD-1 antibody plus locoregional therapy prolonged post-progression survival and overall survival (p = 0.025 and 0.029, respectively). In the secondary resistant group, subsequent treatment did not improve the prognosis of patients. Conclusion: Subsequent PD-1 antibody plus locoregional therapy could achieve survival benefits in HCC patients initially resistant to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy.

Lay abstract This study explored the optimal subsequent treatments for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma resistant to anti-PD-1 therapy. Patients were classified into initial resistant and secondary resistant groups according to whether they had responses to previous anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. By evaluating the prognosis of different treatment modalities in the initial and secondary resistant groups, the authors found that subsequent PD-1 antibody plus locoregional therapy provided survival benefits for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma initially resistant to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. As for patients with secondary resistance, the optimal subsequent treatments need to be further explored.

Anti-PD-1 Immunotherapy Improves the Efficacy of Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) immunotherapy have shown promising outcomes in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), respectively. However, the combination of the two treatments has not been reported. In this study, we compared the efficacy of HAIC combined with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy (HAICAP) and HAIC in patients with advanced HCC. METHODS: Between November 2018 and December 2019, advanced HCC patients that were treated with either HAICAP or HAIC were retrospectively recruited and reviewed for eligibility. Efficacy was evaluated according to tumor response and survival. RESULTS: As a result, 229 patients were included in this study. Patients were divided into HAICAP group (n = 81) and HAIC group (n = 148) accordingly. The follow-up time ranged from 1.0 to 21.6 months, with a median of 11.0 months. The median overall survival was 18.0 months in the HAICAP group and 14.6 months in the HAIC group (p = 0.018; HR = 0.62; 95% CI 0.34-0.91). The median progression-free survival was 10.0 months in the HAICAP group and 5.6 months in the HAIC group (p = 0.006; HR = 0.65; 95% CI 0.43-0.87). The disease control rate in overall response (83% vs 66%; p = 0.006) and intrahepatic response (85% vs 74%, respectively; p = 0.045) were higher in the HAICAP group than in the HAIC group. CONCLUSION: In comparison to HAIC, HAICAP was associated with a better treatment response and survival benefits for patients with advanced HCC.