Antibody-mediated antigen loss switches augmented immunity to antibody-mediated immunosuppression.

Antibodies against fetal red blood cell (RBC) antigens can cause hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). Reductions in HDFN due to anti-RhD antibodies have been achieved through use of Rh immune globulin (RhIg), a polyclonal antibody preparation that causes antibody-mediated immunosuppression (AMIS), thereby preventing maternal immune responses against fetal RBCs. Despite the success of RhIg, it is only effective against 1 alloantigen. The lack of similar interventions that mitigate immune responses toward other RBC alloantigens reflects an incomplete understanding of AMIS mechanisms. AMIS has been previously attributed to rapid antibody-mediated RBC removal, resulting in B-cell ignorance of the RBC alloantigen. However, our data demonstrate that antibody-mediated RBC removal can enhance de novo alloimmunization. In contrast, inclusion of antibodies that possess the ability to rapidly remove the target antigen in the absence of detectable RBC clearance can convert an augmented antibody response to AMIS. These results suggest that the ability of antibodies to remove target antigens from the RBC surface can trigger AMIS in situations in which enhanced immunity may otherwise occur. In doing so, these results hold promise in identifying key antibody characteristics that can drive AMIS, thereby facilitating the design of AMIS approaches toward other RBC antigens to eliminate all forms of HDFN.

Rh immune globulin immunoprophylaxis after RhD-positive red cell exposure in RhD-negative patients via transfusion: A survey of practices.

BACKGROUND: Current Association for the Advancement of Blood & Biotherapies (AABB) standards require transfusion services to have a policy on Rh immune globulin (RhIG) immunoprophylaxis for when RhD-negative patients are exposed to RhD-positive red cells. This is a survey of AABB-accredited transfusion services in the United States (US) regarding institutional policies and practices on RhIG immunoprophylaxis after RhD-negative patients receive RhD-positive (i.e., RhD-incompatible) packed red blood cell (pRBC) and platelet transfusions. RESULTS: Approximately half of the respondents (50.4%, 116/230) have policies on RhIG administration after RhD-incompatible pRBC and platelet transfusions, while others had policies for only pRBC (13.5%, 31/230) or only platelet (17.8%, 41/230) transfusions, but not both. In contrast, 18.3% (42/230) report that their institution has no written policies on RhIG immunoprophylaxis after RhD-incompatible transfusions. Most institutions (70.2%, 99/141) do not have policies addressing safety parameters to mitigate the risk of hemolysis associated with the high dose of RhIG required to prevent RhD alloimmunization after RhD-incompatible pRBC transfusions. DISCUSSION: With approximately half of US AABB-accredited institutions report having policies on RhIG immunoprophylaxis after both RhD-incompatible pRBC and platelet transfusions, some institutions may not be in compliance with AABB standards. Further, most with policies on RhIG immunoprophylaxis after RhD-incompatible pRBC transfusion do not have written safeguards to mitigate the risk of hemolysis associated with the high dose of RhIG required. CONCLUSION: This survey underscores the diverse and inadequate institutional policies on RhIG immunoprophylaxis after RhD exposure in Rh-negative patients via transfusion. This observation identifies an opportunity to improve transfusion safety.

Receipt of RhD-positive whole blood for life-threatening bleeding in female children: A survey in alloimmunized mothers regarding minimum acceptable survival benefit relative to risk of maternal alloimmunization to anti-D.

BACKGROUND: Low-titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) for treatment of hemorrhagic shock sometimes necessitates transfusion of RhD-positive units due to short supply of RhD-negative LTOWB. Practitioners must choose between using RhD-positive LTOWB when RhD-negative is unavailable against the risk to a female of childbearing potential of becoming RhD-alloimmunized, risking hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) in future children, or using component therapy with RhD-negative red cells. This survey asked females with a history of red blood cell (RBC) alloimmunization about their risk tolerance of RhD alloimmunization compared to the potential for improved survival following transfusion of RhD-positive blood for an injured RhD negative female child. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A survey was administered to RBC alloimmunized mothers. Respondents were eligible if they were living in the United States with at least one red cell antibody known to cause HDFN and if they had at least one RBC alloimmunized pregnancy. RESULTS: Responses from 107 RBC alloimmmunized females were analyzed. There were 32/107 (30%) with a history of severe HDFN; 12/107 (11%) had a history of fetal or neonatal loss due to HDFN. The median (interquartile range) absolute improvement in survival at which the respondents would accept RhD-positive transfusions for a female child was 4% (1%-14%). This was not different between females with and without a history of severe or fatal HDFN (p = .08 and 0.38, respectively). CONCLUSION: Alloimmunized mothers would accept the risk of D-alloimmunization in a RhD-negative female child for improved survival in cases of life-threatening bleeding.

Anti-D immunization after D positive platelet transfusions in D negative recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Anti-D can be formed after D-incompatible platelet transfusions due to contaminating D+ red blood cells. These antibodies are of particular importance in women of childbearing potential, because anti-D is most often involved in severe cases of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. This systematic review determined the frequency of anti-D after D+ platelet transfusions and risk factors for D alloimmunization. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Relevant literature was searched using PubMed, Embase and Web of Science until December 2022. Overall anti-D frequency and risk factors were estimated using a random effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: In 22 studies, a total of 3028 D- patients received a mean of six D+ platelet transfusions. After a mean follow-up of seven months 106 of 2808 eligible patients formed anti-D. The pooled anti-D frequency was 3.3% (95% CI 2.0-5.0%; I2 71%). After including only patients with an undoubtable follow-up of at least 4 weeks, 29 of 1497 patients formed anti-D with a pooled primary anti-D rate of 1.9% (95% CI 0.9-3.2%, I2 44%). Women and patients receiving whole blood derived platelets had two and five times higher anti-D rates compared with men and patients receiving apheresis derived platelets, respectively. DISCUSSION: Anti-D immunization is low after D incompatible platelet transfusions and dependent on recipients' sex and platelet source. We propose anti-D prophylaxis in girls and women, capable of becoming pregnant in the future, that received D+ platelets, regardless of platelet source, to reduce the risk of anti-D induced hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn.

Incidence of formation of anti-D between patients with and without a history of solid organ transplant.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Solid organ transplant surgeries including liver transplants constitute a substantial risk of bleeding complications and given frequent national blood shortages, supporting D-negative transplant recipients with D-negative red blood cell products perioperatively can be difficult for the transfusion services. This study was designed to compare the incidence of alloimmunization after D-mismatched red cell transfusions between patients with and without a history of solid organ transplant at a single tertiary care hospital. The patients undergoing solid organ transplants are on strong immunosuppressive regimens perioperatively to help reduce the risk of rejection. We hypothesized that the use of these immunosuppressive agents makes these patients very less likely to mount an immune response and form anti-D antibodies when exposed to the D-positive red blood cell products perioperatively. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: At our center, D-negative patients who received ≥1 unit of D-positive red blood cell products were identified using historical transfusion records. Antibody testing results were examined to determine the incidence of the formation of anti-D and any other red cell alloantibodies after transfusion and these results were compared between patients with and without a history of solid organ transplant. RESULTS: We were able to identify a total of 22 patients over 10 years with D-negative phenotype who had undergone a solid organ transplant and had received D-positive red blood cell products during the transplant surgeries. We also identified a second group of 54 patients with D-negative phenotype who had received D-positive red blood cell products for other indications including medical and surgical. A comparison of the data showed no new anti-D formation among patients with a history of D mismatched transfusion during solid organ transplant surgeries. CONCLUSION: Among our limited study population, we observed a very low likelihood of D alloimmunization among solid organ transplant recipients. A larger, prospective study could help further evaluate the need for prophylactic D matching for red cell transfusions during solid organ transplant surgeries.

Autoimmune anti-D in an RhD-positive young infant: Learning from a rare case.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Anti-D is usually immune in nature and is formed in individuals lacking D antigen or having variants/altered D phenotypes. In the Indian population, 93.8% are RhD positive, and R1 R1 is the commonest Rh phenotype. Here we report a rare and interesting case of autoimmune anti-D in an RhD-positive 3-month-old infant leading to warm autoimmune haemolytic anaemia. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Auto-anti-D was detected serologically by immunohaematological techniques such as direct antiglobulin test, antibody detection and identification, dithiothreitol, enzyme treatment, antibody titration and elution. Molecular studies were performed to rule out genetic variants of RhD. RESULTS: Anti-D was confirmed in eluate and blood group post elution was B RhD positive. On genotyping using the Indian-specific RHD genotyping assay, the sample was found to be negative for the RHD*01W.150 (most common RhD variant in Indians) but positive for RHD exon 5 and RHD exon 10 along with glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). The sample was further sequenced for RHD exons 1-10 by Sanger sequencing and found to be a wild type, thus, ruling out the presence of an RhD variant. CONCLUSION: This case is of interest because of the rare occurrence of autoimmune anti-D in an RhD-positive patient of such a young age (3 months). To the best of our knowledge, only two case reports have been published on autoimmune anti-D in infancy (in 1961 and 1964).

Guideline No. 448: Prevention of Rh D Alloimmunization.

OBJECTIVE: This guideline provides recommendations for the prevention of Rh D alloimmunization (isoimmunization) in pregnancy, including parental testing, routine postpartum and antepartum prophylaxis, and other clinical indications for prophylaxis. Prevention of red cell alloimmunization in pregnancy with atypical antigens (other than the D antigen), for which immunoprophylaxis is not currently available, is not addressed in this guideline. TARGET POPULATION: All Rh D-negative pregnant individuals at risk for Rh D alloimmunization due to potential exposure to a paternally derived fetal Rh D antigen. OUTCOMES: Routine postpartum and antepartum Rh D immunoprophylaxis reduces the risk of Rh D alloimmunization at 6 months postpartum and in a subsequent pregnancy. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: This guideline details the population of pregnant individuals who may benefit from Rho(D) immune globulin (RhIG) immunoprophylaxis. Thus, those for whom the intervention is not required may avoid adverse effects, while those who are at risk of alloimmunization may mitigate this risk for themselves and/or their fetus. EVIDENCE: For recommendations regarding use of RhIG, Medline and Medline in Process via Ovid and Embase Classic + Embase via Ovid were searched using both the trials and observational studies search strategies with study design filters. For trials, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects via Ovid were also searched. All databases were searched from January 2000 to November 26, 2019. Studies published before 2000 were captured from the grey literature of national obstetrics and gynaecology specialty societies, luminary specialty journals, and bibliographic searching. A formal process for the systematic review was undertaken for this update, as described in the systematic review manuscript published separately. VALIDATION METHODS: The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the SOGC's modified GRADE approach. See Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and conditional [weak] recommendations). INTENDED AUDIENCE: The intended users of this guideline include prenatal care providers such as obstetricians, midwives, family physicians, emergency room physicians, and residents, as well as registered nurses and nurse practitioners. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: An updated Canadian guideline for prevention of Rh D alloimmunization addresses D variants, cffDNA for fetal Rh type, and updates recommendations on timing of RhIG administration. SUMMARY STATEMENTS: RECOMMENDATIONS.

Antenatal RHD screening to guide antenatal anti-D immunoprophylaxis in non-immunized D- pregnant women.

In pregnancy, D- pregnant women may be at risk of becoming immunized against D when carrying a D+ fetus, which may eventually lead to hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Administrating antenatal and postnatal anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis decreases the risk of immunization substantially. Noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping, based on testing cell-free DNA extracted from maternal plasma, offers a reliable tool to predict the fetal RhD phenotype during pregnancy. Used as a screening program, antenatal RHD screening can guide the administration of antenatal prophylaxis in non-immunized D- pregnant women so that unnecessary prophylaxis is avoided in those women who carry a D- fetus. In Europe, antenatal RHD screening programs have been running since 2009, demonstrating high test accuracies and program feasibility. In this review, an overview is provided of current state-of-the-art antenatal RHD screening, which includes discussions on the rationale for its implementation, methodology, detection strategies, and test performance. The performance of antenatal RHD screening in a routine setting is characterized by high accuracy, with a high diagnostic sensitivity of ≥99.9 percent. The result of using antenatal RHD screening is that 97-99 percent of the women who carry a D- fetus avoid unnecessary prophylaxis. As such, this activity contributes to avoiding unnecessary treatment and saves valuable anti-D immunoglobulin, which has a shortage worldwide. The main challenges for a reliable noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping assay are low cell-free DNA levels, the genetics of the Rh blood group system, and choosing an appropriate detection strategy for an admixed population. In many parts of the world, however, the main challenge is to improve the basic care for D- pregnant women.

Serologic profiling of D variants in donor routine: unveiling the impact on false-negative results and alloimmunization.

The high number of D variants can lead to the unnecessary use of Rh immune globulin, overuse of D- RBC units, and anti-D allommunization. D variant prevalence varies among ethnic groups, and knowledge of the main variants present in a specific population, their behavior in serologic tests, and their impact on clinical practice is crucial to define the best serologic tests for routine use. The present study aimed to explore the serologic profile of D variants and to determine which variants are most associated with false-negative D typing results and alloimmunization. Donor samples were selected in two study periods. During the first period, D typing was performed on a semi-automated instrument in microplates, and weak D tests were conducted in tube or gel tests. In the second period, D typing was carried out using an automated instrument with microplates, and weak D tests were performed in solid phase. Samples from patients typed as D+ with anti-D were also selected. All samples were characterized by molecular testing. A total of 37 RHD variants were identified. Discrepancies and atypical reactivity without anti-D formation were observed in 83.4 percent of the samples, discrepant D typing results between donations were seen in 12.3 percent, and D+ patients with anti-D comprised 4.3 percent. DAR1.2 was the most prevalent variant. Weak D type 38 was responsible for 75 percent of discrepant samples, followed by weak D type 11, predominantly detected by solid phase. Among the D variants related to alloimmunization, DIVa was the most prevalent, which was not recognized by serologic testing; the same was true for DIIIc. The results highlight the importance of selecting tests for donor screening capable of detecting weak D types 38 and 11, especially in populations where these variants are more prevalent. In pre-transfusion testing, it is crucial that D typing reagents demonstrate weak reactivity with DAR variants; having a serologic strategy to recognize DIVa and DIIIc is also valuable.

Why should intramuscular anti-D be different from intravenous anti-D?

For reasons of safety the use of intravenous anti D to treat ITP has largely been abandoned because of the risk it incurs of intravascular haemolysis. Intramuscular delivery of anti-D could be a safer approach and deserves to be further evaluated. IV anti-D was a mainstay of ITP treatment in the United States in the 1990's until the development of intravascular hemolysis (IVH) and its serious even fatal consequences was appreciated. Subsequently, treatment of patients with ITP with IV anti-D has become very rare given other alternatives and the IVH risk. IM anti-D does not carry a risk for IVH and it should be re-evaluated and reconsidered as an option for D+ DAT-negative not splenectomized adults who do not have a long duration of ITP and require maintenance treatment. Commentary on: Lakhwani, et al. Intramuscular Anti-D treatment for immune thrombocytopenia: A single centre experience. Br J Haematol 2023;200:353-357.

Intramuscular Anti-D treatment for immune thrombocytopenia: A single centre experience.

Intravenous Anti-Rhesus-D immunoglobulin (Anti-D) is a first-line treatment option for immune thrombocytopenia in non-splenectomised and RhD-positive patients. In this report, we retrospectively review our experience with intramuscular (IM) Anti-D treatment in 74 adult patients between 1990 and 2018. We found that 73% of patients showed a response; almost all of them had complete responses (68.9%), and 26% achieved complete responses sustained at least 6 months after treatment discontinuation. [Correction added on 02 December 2022, after first online publication: In the preceding sentence, '(68.89%)' has been corrected to '(68.9%)' in this version.] No significant side effects were observed with no cases of acute haemolysis or anaemia reported. We conclude from this study that IM Anti-D is an effective and safe treatment for immune thrombocytopenia.

Asian-type DEL (RHD*DEL1) with an allo-anti-D: A paradoxical observation in a healthy multiparous woman.

BACKGROUND: The DEL phenotype is the D variant expressing the least amounts of D antigen per red cell. Asian-type DEL (RHD:c:1227G > A) is the most prevalent DEL in East Asia without any anti-D alloimmunization reported before. We investigated the first observation of an anti-D in any DEL phenotype, reported in the Japanese language at a 1987 conference, only 3 years after the discovery of DEL. METHODS: We contacted the proband 35 years after the initial report. Standard hemagglutination, adsorption/elution, and flow cytometry tests were performed, as was nucleotide sequencing for the RHD, RHCE, and HLA class I and class II genes. RESULTS: The healthy multiparous Japanese woman, a regular blood donor, still had the anti-D of titer 8 representing an alloantibody by standard serologic methods. Unexpectedly, she carried an Asian-type DEL without any additional RHD gene variation. All 12 HLA alleles identified were known in the Japanese population. Interestingly, one of her HLA-DRB1 and a variant of her HLA-DQB1 alleles had previously been associated with anti-D immunization. CONCLUSION: We described an allo-anti-D, maintained for more than three decades, in an Asian-type DEL. The combination of two implicated HLA alleles were rare and could have contributed to the anti-D immunization. Continued monitoring of anti-D immunization events in patients with DEL is warranted, and we discuss possible mechanisms for further study. As only this single observation has been recognized in the last 35 years, the current recommendation is affirmed: Individuals with Asian-type DEL should be treated as Rh D-positive for transfusion and Rh immune prophylaxis purposes.

Association of HLA-DRB1 alleles with anti-D alloimmunization in RhD negative pregnant women in India.

BACKGROUND: Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) restriction plays an important role in the susceptibility to alloimmunization against red blood cell (RBC) antigens. The prevalence of anti-D alloimmunization in RhD negative pregnancy is still quite high in our population. Thus, we planned this study to determine the association of HLA-DRB1 alleles with anti-D alloimmunization in RhD negative pregnant women. MATERIAL AND METHODS: RBC antibody screen (ABS) was performed for RhD negative pregnant women attending the antenatal clinic our institute. Those with a negative result were included in the 'non-alloimmunized' (NAL) group ('Control' group), while those with anti-D alloantibody on performing antibody identification were included in the alloimmunized (AL) group of the study (n = 50 each). ABS and identification were done using column agglutination technique. The HLA-DRB1 typing was done by Luminex based reverse sequence specific oligonucleotide probing (SSOP) using commercial kits. The HLA-DRB1 allele frequency was compared in both the groups. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of gravida (p < 0.001) and history of anti-D immunoprophylaxis (p < 0.001). The frequency of HLA-DRB1*03 and HLA-DRB1*04 alleles was significantly higher in the AL group than the NAL group: 40 % versus 18 % [Odds Ratio (OR): 3.04, 95 % CI: 1.21-7.6; p = 0.015] for HLA-DRB1*03 alleles and 18 % versus 4 % (OR: 5.27, 95 % CI: 1.08-25.78, p = 0.025) for HLA-DRB1*04 alleles. CONCLUSION: The frequency of HLADRB1*03 and HLADRB1*04 alleles was significantly higher in RhD negative pregnant women alloimmunized with anti-D alloantibody.

Rh(D) immune globulin administration in pregnancy: Retrospective audit of patient safety events followed by targeted educational intervention with Bayesian analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To examine local patient safety events related to the administration of anti-Rh(D) immune globin (RhIG) during pregnancy, and to follow-up with targeted educational intervention to improve knowledge of this process. BACKGROUND: Administration RhIG is established treatment for the prevention of haemolytic disease of the foetus and newborn (HDFN). However, patient safety events in relation to its correct use continue to occur. METHODS: A retrospective audit of patient safety events related to RhIG administration during pregnancy was performed. Targeted educational intervention in the form of PowerPoint® presentation were given to nursing staff, laboratory staff and physicians and evaluated with pre- and post-tests using multiple-choice questions given immediately before and after the presentation. RESULTS: An annual incidence of 0.24% of patient safety events related to the administration of RhIG during pregnancy was found. These events were mostly in the preanalytical phase, for example mislabelled samples or samples for D-rosette/Kleihauer-Betke testing drawn from the baby, not the mother. Using Bayesian analysis, the probability of positive effect for the targeted educational intervention was 100% with a median improved score of 29%. This was compared with a control group using standard curriculum education intervention based on the current curriculum for nursing, laboratory and medical students which showed a median improved score of only 4.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of RhIG during pregnancy is a multistep process involving health care professionals of several disciplines providing opportunities to enhance the curriculum for nursing, laboratory and medical students and to ensure on-going education.

Terminating Routine Cord Blood RhD Typing of the Newborns to Guide Postnatal Anti-D Immunoglobulin Prophylaxis Based on the Results of Fetal RHD Genotyping.

INTRODUCTION: Targeted routine antenatal prophylaxis with anti-D immunoglobulin (Ig) only to RhD-negative pregnant women who carry RhD-positive fetuses (determined by fetal RHD genotyping) has reduced D-alloimmunization significantly when administered in addition to postnatal prophylaxis. Achieving high analysis sensitivity and few false-negative fetal RHD results will make RhD typing of the newborn redundant. Postnatal prophylaxis can then be given based on the result of fetal RHD genotyping. Terminating routine RhD typing of the newborns in cord blood will streamline maternity care. Accordingly, we compared the results of fetal RHD genotyping with RhD typing of the newborns. METHODS: Fetal RHD genotyping was performed, and antenatal anti-D Ig was administered at gestational week 24 and 28, respectively. Data for 2017-2020 are reported. RESULTS: Ten laboratories reported 18,536 fetal RHD genotypings, and 16,378 RhD typing results of newborns. We found 46 false-positive (0.28%) and seven false-negative (0.04%) results. Sensitivity of the assays was 99.93%, while specificity was 99.24%. CONCLUSION: Few false-negative results support the good analysis quality of fetal RHD genotyping. Routine cord blood RhD typing will therefore be discontinued nationwide and postnatal anti-D Ig will now be given based on the result of fetal RHD genotyping.

Outcome predictors for maternal red blood cell alloimmunisation with anti-K and anti-D managed with intrauterine blood transfusion.

Red blood cell (RBC) alloimmunisation with anti-D and anti-K comprise the majority of cases of fetal haemolytic disease requiring intrauterine red cell transfusion (IUT). Few studies have investigated which haematological parameters can predict adverse fetal or neonatal outcomes. The aim of the present study was to identify predictors of adverse outcome, including preterm birth, intrauterine fetal demise (IUFD), neonatal death (NND) and/or neonatal transfusion. We reviewed the records of all pregnancies alloimmunised with anti-K and anti-D, requiring IUT over 27 years at a quaternary fetal centre. We reviewed data for 128 pregnancies in 116 women undergoing 425 IUTs. The median gestational age (GA) at first IUT was significantly earlier for anti-K than for anti-D (24·3 vs. 28·7 weeks, P = 0·004). Women with anti-K required more IUTs than women with anti-D (3·84 vs. 3·12 mean IUTs, P = 0·036) and the fetal haemoglobin (Hb) at first IUT was significantly lower (51.0 vs. 70.5 g/l, P = 0·001). The mean estimated daily decrease in Hb did not differ between the two groups. A greater number of IUTs and a slower daily decrease in Hb (g/l/day) between first and second IUTs were predictive of a longer period in utero. Earlier GA at first IUT and a shorter interval from the first IUT until delivery predicted IUFD/NND. Earlier GA and lower Hb at first IUT significantly predicted need for phototherapy and/or blood product use in the neonate. In the anti-K group, a greater number of IUTs was required in women with a higher titre. Furthermore, the higher the titre, the earlier the GA at which an IUT was required in both groups. The rate of fall in fetal Hb between IUTs decreased, as the number of transfusions increased. Our present study identified pregnancies at considerable risk of an unfavourable outcome with anti-D and anti-K RBC alloimmunisation. Identifying such patients can guide pregnancy management, facilitates patient counselling, and can optimise resource use. Prospective studies can also incorporate these characteristics, in addition to laboratory markers, to further identify and improve the outcomes of these pregnancies.

Cost-effectiveness of noninvasive fetal RhD blood group genotyping in nonalloimmunized and alloimmunized pregnancies.

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the cost-effectiveness of noninvasive fetal RhD blood group genotyping in nonalloimmunized and alloimmunized pregnancies in Canada. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We developed two probabilistic state-transition (Markov) microsimulation models to compare fetal genotyping followed by targeted management versus usual care (i.e., universal Rh immunoglobulin [RhIG] prophylaxis in nonalloimmunized RhD-negative pregnancies, or universal intensive monitoring in alloimmunized pregnancies). The reference case considered a healthcare payer perspective and a 10-year time horizon. Sensitivity analysis examined assumptions related to test cost, paternal screening, subsequent pregnancies, other alloantibodies (e.g., K, Rh c/C/E), societal perspective, and lifetime horizon. RESULTS: Fetal genotyping in nonalloimmunized pregnancies (at per-sample test cost of C$247/US$311) was associated with a slightly higher probability of maternal alloimmunization (22 vs. 21 per 10,000) and a reduced number of RhIG injections (1.427 vs. 1.795) than usual care. It was more expensive (C$154/US$194, 95% Credible Interval [CrI]: C$139/US$175-C$169/US$213) and had little impact on QALYs (0.0007, 95%CrI: -0.01-0.01). These results were sensitive to the test cost (threshold achieved at C$88/US$111), and inclusion of paternal screening. Fetal genotyping in alloimmunized pregnancies (at test cost of C$328/US$413) was less expensive (-C$6280/US$7903, 95% CrI: -C$6325/US$7959 to -C$6229/US$7838) and more effective (0.19 QALYs, 95% CrI 0.17-0.20) than usual care. These cost savings remained robust in sensitivity analyses. DISCUSSION: Noninvasive fetal RhD genotyping saves resources and represents good value for the management of alloimmunized pregnancies. If the cost of genotyping is substantially decreased, the targeted intervention can become a viable option for nonalloimmunized pregnancies.

Routine noninvasive prenatal screening for fetal Rh D in maternal plasma-A 2-year experience from a single center in Belgium.

BACKGROUND: Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) due to rhesus D (RhD) immunization is a potentially life-threatening situation for which use of Rh Immunoglobulin (RhIg) has decreased risk drastically. Determination of fetal RHD on maternal plasma can be used to restrict prenatal RhIg administration to women carrying an RhD-positive child, avoiding unnecessary administration of blood-derived products. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The aim of this study is to determine the performance of fetal RHD typing in our center. We prospectively collected 205 fetal RHD and 127 serological cord blood RhD data from RhD-negative women starting at 11 weeks of pregnancy (from October 2019 to October 2021). Real-time polymerase chain reaction targeting RHD exon 5 and 7 was used, similar to the screening program in The Netherlands, supplemented with an amplification control (beta-actin; ACTB) and a sex determination marker located on the Y-chromosome (SRY gene). RESULTS: Fetal RHD testing reached a sensitivity and specificity of 100%. No false-negative nor false-positive results were reported. Inconclusive results (6%, 13/205) were due to weak amplification in 10 cases, a maternal RHD variant in 2 cases (RHD*01N.71 and partial DVI), and a fetal RHD variant (partial DVI) in 1 case. Unnecessary administration of RhIg prophylaxis was avoided in 33% of cases and on the other hand was administered in one case (fetal partial DVI) which would have been missed with cord blood serology. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrates the high accuracy of routine prenatal fetal RHD gene screening after 11 weeks of pregnancy, encouraging routine clinical practice.

Real-world experience of anti-D immunoglobulin in immune thrombocytopenia.

In developing countries, anti-D has been used in immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) as a cheaper alternative to human immunoglobulin. We aim to analyze the response and safety profile of anti-D in patients with severe ITP. A retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Northern India. Patients received a single intravenous infusion of 75 µg/kg anti-D. In total, 36 patients (20 females) were included in this study. The median duration from ITP diagnosis to anti-D therapy was 235 days (range 1-1613 days). Four (11.1%) patients received anti-D as an upfront treatment. The patients' platelet counts rose significantly by the end of day three and continued to be significantly high until day 30 of receiving anti-D (p ≤ 0.001). The overall response rate (ORR) by day seven was 88.89%. There was no effect of age, sex, duration of disease, prior therapy, and platelet count on the ORR. Patients were followed up for a median duration of 52 days (longest follow-up: 3080 days). Six (6/36, 16.67%) patients continued to be in remission till the last follow-up. The hemoglobin fall was statistically significant on day three and day seven (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001) and got normalized by day 30. We observed equally good ORR in mixed populations and different phases of ITP along with long-term sustained response. The study demonstrates a quick and high response rate along with good safety profile to anti-D in all forms of ITP.

It is about who you know (and how you help them): Insights from staff and donors about how to recruit and retain a panel of committed anti-D donors.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Maintaining a panel of committed anti-D donors is crucial for the production of anti-D immunoglobulin to prevent haemolytic disease of the foetus and newborn. Given low numbers of donors in the Australian panel, there is a need to better understand motivators and barriers specific to anti-D donors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A qualitative approach was used to gather perspectives of staff and current anti-D donors in Australia. Focus groups were held with staff involved with the anti-D programme. An asynchronous online discussion forum and interviews were conducted with donors. All data were coded using deductive and inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Staff stressed the importance of recruiting donors who met their own informal criteria as well as the formal selection criteria in order to maximize the chances of donors committing to making regular plasma donations. In contrast, donors were motivated by having a personal connection to anti-D, the recipient group and being eligible to join the programme. Support from staff and understanding the value of their donations also helped donors overcome concerns about the risks of joining the programme and reduced barriers to remaining in the programme. CONCLUSION: Anti-D donors in Australia are motivated by multiple factors, including knowing who the recipient is, and dedicated staff are integral to building donors' commitment through education and support. Findings suggest the current approach to recruitment could be broadened to include all donors who meet formal selection criteria, with retention enhanced by reinforcing and rewarding the motives identified by donors for donating.