Interaction of Cardiovascular Nonmodifiable Risk Factors, Comorbidities and Comedications With Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury and Cardioprotection by Pharmacological Treatments and Ischemic Conditioning.

Preconditioning, postconditioning, and remote conditioning of the myocardium enhance the ability of the heart to withstand a prolonged ischemia/reperfusion insult and the potential to provide novel therapeutic paradigms for cardioprotection. While many signaling pathways leading to endogenous cardioprotection have been elucidated in experimental studies over the past 30 years, no cardioprotective drug is on the market yet for that indication. One likely major reason for this failure to translate cardioprotection into patient benefit is the lack of rigorous and systematic preclinical evaluation of promising cardioprotective therapies prior to their clinical evaluation, since ischemic heart disease in humans is a complex disorder caused by or associated with cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities. These risk factors and comorbidities induce fundamental alterations in cellular signaling cascades that affect the development of ischemia/reperfusion injury and responses to cardioprotective interventions. Moreover, some of the medications used to treat these comorbidities may impact on cardioprotection by again modifying cellular signaling pathways. The aim of this article is to review the recent evidence that cardiovascular risk factors as well as comorbidities and their medications may modify the response to cardioprotective interventions. We emphasize the critical need for taking into account the presence of cardiovascular risk factors as well as comorbidities and their concomitant medications when designing preclinical studies for the identification and validation of cardioprotective drug targets and clinical studies. This will hopefully maximize the success rate of developing rational approaches to effective cardioprotective therapies for the majority of patients with multiple comorbidities. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Ischemic heart disease is a major cause of mortality; however, there are still no cardioprotective drugs on the market. Most studies on cardioprotection have been undertaken in animal models of ischemia/reperfusion in the absence of comorbidities; however, ischemic heart disease develops with other systemic disorders (e.g., hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, atherosclerosis). Here we focus on the preclinical and clinical evidence showing how these comorbidities and their routine medications affect ischemia/reperfusion injury and interfere with cardioprotective strategies.

Percutaneous Revascularization for Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Whether revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can improve event-free survival and left ventricular function in patients with severe ischemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction, as compared with optimal medical therapy (i.e., individually adjusted pharmacologic and device therapy for heart failure) alone, is unknown. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 35% or less, extensive coronary artery disease amenable to PCI, and demonstrable myocardial viability to a strategy of either PCI plus optimal medical therapy (PCI group) or optimal medical therapy alone (optimal-medical-therapy group). The primary composite outcome was death from any cause or hospitalization for heart failure. Major secondary outcomes were left ventricular ejection fraction at 6 and 12 months and quality-of-life scores. RESULTS: A total of 700 patients underwent randomization - 347 were assigned to the PCI group and 353 to the optimal-medical-therapy group. Over a median of 41 months, a primary-outcome event occurred in 129 patients (37.2%) in the PCI group and in 134 patients (38.0%) in the optimal-medical-therapy group (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78 to 1.27; P = 0.96). The left ventricular ejection fraction was similar in the two groups at 6 months (mean difference, -1.6 percentage points; 95% CI, -3.7 to 0.5) and at 12 months (mean difference, 0.9 percentage points; 95% CI, -1.7 to 3.4). Quality-of-life scores at 6 and 12 months appeared to favor the PCI group, but the difference had diminished at 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with severe ischemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction who received optimal medical therapy, revascularization by PCI did not result in a lower incidence of death from any cause or hospitalization for heart failure. (Funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment Program; REVIVED-BCIS2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01920048.).

A simulation study on the antiarrhythmic mechanisms of established agents in myocardial ischemia and infarction.

Patients with myocardial ischemia and infarction are at increased risk of arrhythmias, which in turn, can exacerbate the overall risk of mortality. Despite the observed reduction in recurrent arrhythmias through antiarrhythmic drug therapy, the precise mechanisms underlying their effectiveness in treating ischemic heart disease remain unclear. Moreover, there is a lack of specialized drugs designed explicitly for the treatment of myocardial ischemic arrhythmia. This study employs an electrophysiological simulation approach to investigate the potential antiarrhythmic effects and underlying mechanisms of various pharmacological agents in the context of ischemia and myocardial infarction (MI). Based on physiological experimental data, computational models are developed to simulate the effects of a series of pharmacological agents (amiodarone, telmisartan, E-4031, chromanol 293B, and glibenclamide) on cellular electrophysiology and utilized to further evaluate their antiarrhythmic effectiveness during ischemia. On 2D and 3D tissues with multiple pathological conditions, the simulation results indicate that the antiarrhythmic effect of glibenclamide is primarily attributed to the suppression of efflux of potassium ion to facilitate the restitution of [K+]o, as opposed to recovery of IKATP during myocardial ischemia. This discovery implies that, during acute cardiac ischemia, pro-arrhythmogenic alterations in cardiac tissue's excitability and conduction properties are more significantly influenced by electrophysiological changes in the depolarization rate, as opposed to variations in the action potential duration (APD). These findings offer specific insights into potentially effective targets for investigating ischemic arrhythmias, providing significant guidance for clinical interventions in acute coronary syndrome.

Role of arachidonic acid in ischemic heart disease under different comorbidities: risk or protection?

In a translational study involving animal models and human subjects, Lv et al. demonstrate that arachidonic acid (AA) exhibits cardioprotective effects in diabetic myocardial ischemia, suggesting a departure from its known role in promoting ferroptosis-a form of cell death characterized by iron-dependent lipid peroxidation. However, the study does not address how underlying diabetic conditions might influence the metabolic pathways of AA, which are critical for fully understanding its impact on heart disease. Diabetes can significantly alter lipid metabolism, which in turn might affect the enzymatic processes involved in AA's metabolism, leading to different outcomes in the disease process. Further examination of the role of diabetes in modulating AA's effects could enhance the understanding of its protective mechanism in ischemic conditions. This could also lead to more targeted and effective therapeutic strategies for managing myocardial ischemia in diabetic patients, such as optimizing AA levels to prevent heart damage while avoiding exacerbating factors like ferroptosis.

Ischemia but no obstructive coronary artery disease: more than meets the eye.

Symptomatic women with angina are more likely to have ischemia with no obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) compared to men. In both men and women, the finding of INOCA is not benign and is associated with adverse cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction, heart failure and angina hospitalizations. Women with INOCA have more angina and a lower quality of life compared to men, but they are often falsely reassured because of a lack of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and a perception of low risk. Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is a key pathophysiologic contributor to INOCA, and non-invasive imaging methods are used to detect impaired microvascular flow. Coronary vasospasm is another mechanism of INOCA, and can co-exist with CMD, but usually requires invasive coronary function testing (CFT) with provocation testing for a definitive diagnosis. In addition to traditional heart disease risk factors, inflammatory, hormonal and psychological risk factors that impact microvascular tone are implicated in INOCA. Treatment of risk factors and use of anti-atherosclerotic and anti-anginal medications offer benefit. Increasing awareness and early referral to specialized centers that focus on INOCA management can improve patient-oriented outcomes. However, large, randomized treatment trials to investigate the impact on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) are needed. In this focused review, we discuss the prevalence, pathophysiology, presentation, diagnosis and treatment of INOCA.

Potential Targets of Natural Products for Improving Cardiac Ischemic Injury: The Role of Nrf2 Signaling Transduction.

Myocardial ischemia is the leading cause of health loss from cardiovascular disease worldwide. Myocardial ischemia and hypoxia during exercise trigger the risk of sudden exercise death which, in severe cases, will further lead to myocardial infarction. The Nrf2 transcription factor is an important antioxidant regulator that is extensively engaged in biological processes such as oxidative stress, inflammatory response, apoptosis, and mitochondrial malfunction. It has a significant role in the prevention and treatment of several cardiovascular illnesses, since it can control not only the expression of several antioxidant genes, but also the target genes of associated pathological processes. Therefore, targeting Nrf2 will have great potential in the treatment of myocardial ischemic injury. Natural products are widely used to treat myocardial ischemic diseases because of their few side effects. A large number of studies have shown that the Nrf2 transcription factor can be used as an important way for natural products to alleviate myocardial ischemia. However, the specific role and related mechanism of Nrf2 in mediating natural products in the treatment of myocardial ischemia is still unclear. Therefore, this review combs the key role and possible mechanism of Nrf2 in myocardial ischemic injury, and emphatically summarizes the significant role of natural products in treating myocardial ischemic symptoms, thus providing a broad foundation for clinical transformation.

[Compatibility mechanism of Qishen Yiqi Dripping Pills for treatment of myocardial ischemia based on UPLC-Q-Exactive Orbitrap-MS and network pharmacology].

Clinical efficacy and mechanism of Qishen Yiqi Dripping Pills(QSYQ) have been well researched, but the compatibility mechanism underlying its therapeutic effect still requires further analysis. This study aims to explore the compatibility mechanism of QSYQ in treating myocardial ischemia. UPLC-Q-Exactive Orbitrap-MS technique was used to obtain the absorbed blood components of QSYQ. Target proteins of the absorbed components were collected and screened using TCMSP, TCMIP, and SwissTargetPrediction databases. Disease proteins related to myocardial ischemia were obtained through GeneCards, OMIM, and DisGeNET databases. Core targets and core components were obtained using online plotting software Venny 2.1.0, STRING, and Cytoscape 3.9.1 software. David database was used for GO functional annotation and KEGG pathway enrichment of core targets, obtaining the main pathways of QSYQ in treating myocardial ischemia and drawing visualized network diagrams. The compatibility mechanism was analyzed based on "component-target", "drug-pathway", and "PI3K-AKT" characteristic pathways, and molecular docking was used for validation. This study obtained 42 absorbed blood components of QSYQ, 556 component targets, 1 980 disease targets, 69 core targets, and 15 core components. QSYQ can exert therapeutic effects on myocardial ischemia by regulating proteins such as MAPK1, RELA, SRC, JUN, and STAT3, acting on signaling pathways such as HIF-1, PI3K-AKT, Toll-like, MAPK, VEGF, etc. The interaction network diagrams of "component-target" and "drug-pathway" preliminarily elucidated the synergy among the four drugs in this prescription at the level of targets and pathways. The PI3K-AKT characteristic pathway indicated that the sovereign drug Huangqi(Astragali Radix) and minister drug Danshen(Salviae Miltiorrhizae Radix et Rhizoma) could regulate most targets in this pathway, while the assistant drug Sanqi(Notoginseng Radix et Rhizoma) cooperated with Huangqi and Danshen on IL6 and AKT proteins, and the envoy drug Jiangxiang(Dalbergiae Odoriferae Lignum) acted on AKT and RXRA proteins, with all drugs acting synergistically on proteins such as AKT, RXRA, NFKB to regulate cell survival and promote angiogenesis. Molecular docking indicated that hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions might be the main forms of action, also validating the distribution of binding energy of the PI3K-AKT signaling pathway. This study analyzed the compatibility connotation of QSYQ from multiple dimensions including drugs, components, targets, and pathways, providing reference basis for the study of the mechanism of action and compatibility rules of QSYQ.

[Anti-myocardial ischemic injury effects and mechanisms of cryptotanshinone in regulating macrophage polarisation through Dectin-1 signalling pathway].

The aim of this study was to investigate the potential mechanism by which cryptotanshinone(CTS) may exert its anti-myo-cardial ischemic effect through the regulation of macrophage polarization via the dendritic cell-associated C-type lectin 1(Dectin-1) signaling pathway. Male C57BL/6 mice, aged six weeks, were utilized to establish myocardial ischemia models and were subsequently divided into five groups: sham, model, CTS low-dose(21 mg·kg~(-1)·d~(-1)), CTS high-dose(84 mg·kg~(-1)·d~(-1)), and dapagliflozin(0.14 mg·kg~(-1)·d~(-1)). The cardiac function, serum enzyme levels, Dectin-1 expression, macrophage polarization, and neutrophil infiltration in the myocardial infarction area were assessed in each group. An in vitro model of M1-type macrophages was constructed using lipopolysaccharide/interfe-ron-γ(LPS/IFN-γ) stimulated RAW264.7 cells to investigate the impact of CTS on macrophage polarization and to examine alterations in key proteins within the Dectin-1 signaling pathway. In the CTS group, compared to the model group mice, there was a significant improvement in the cardiac function and myocardial injury, along with a notable increase in the ratio of M2/M1-type macrophages in the myocardial infarcted area and a decrease in neutrophil infiltration. Additionally, Dectin-1 exhibited low expression. The results of in vitro experiments demonstrated that CTS can decrease the expression of M1-type marker genes and increase the expression of M2-type marker genes. Besides, it can decrease the levels of Dectin-1 and the phosphorylation of its associated proteins, including spleen tyrosine kinase(Syk), protein kinase B(Akt), nuclear factor-kappaB p65(NF-κB p65), and extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases(ERK1/2). Additionally, CTS was found to enhance the phosphorylation of signal transducer and activator of transcription-6(STAT6). The above results suggest that CTS exerts its anti-myocardial ischemic injury effect by regulating macrophage polarization through the Dectin-1 signaling pathway.

RyR2 inhibition with dantrolene is antiarrhythmic, prevents further pathological remodeling, and improves cardiac function in chronic ischemic heart disease.

Diastolic Ca2+ leak due to cardiac ryanodine receptor (RyR2) hyperactivity has been widely documented in chronic ischemic heart disease (CIHD) and may contribute to ventricular tachycardia (VT) risk and progressive left-ventricular (LV) remodeling. Here we test the hypothesis that targeting RyR2 hyperactivity can suppress VT inducibility and progressive heart failure in CIHD by the RyR2 inhibitor dantrolene. METHODS AND RESULTS: CIHD was induced in C57BL/6 J mice by left coronary artery ligation. Four weeks later, mice were randomized to either acute or chronic (6 weeks via implanted osmotic pump) treatment with dantrolene or vehicle. VT inducibility was assessed by programmed stimulation in vivo and in isolated hearts. Electrical substrate remodeling was assessed by optical mapping. Ca2+ sparks and spontaneous Ca2+ releases were measured in isolated cardiomyocytes. Cardiac remodeling was quantified by histology and qRT-PCR. Cardiac function and contractility were measured using echocardiography. Compared to vehicle, acute dantrolene treatment reduced VT inducibility. Optical mapping demonstrated reentrant VT prevention by dantrolene, which normalized the shortened refractory period (VERP) and prolonged action potential duration (APD), preventing APD alternans. In single CIHD cardiomyocytes, dantrolene normalized RyR2 hyperactivity and prevented spontaneous intracellular Ca2+ release. Chronic dantrolene treatment not only reduced VT inducibility but also reduced peri-infarct fibrosis and prevented further progression of LV dysfunction in CIHD mice. CONCLUSIONS: RyR2 hyperactivity plays a mechanistic role for VT risk, post-infarct remodeling, and contractile dysfunction in CIHD mice. Our data provide proof of concept for the anti-arrhythmic and anti-remodeling efficacy of dantrolene in CIHD.

Allopurinol versus usual care in UK patients with ischaemic heart disease (ALL-HEART): a multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial.

BACKGROUND: Allopurinol is a urate-lowering therapy used to treat patients with gout. Previous studies have shown that allopurinol has positive effects on several cardiovascular parameters. The ALL-HEART study aimed to determine whether allopurinol therapy improves major cardiovascular outcomes in patients with ischaemic heart disease. METHODS: ALL-HEART was a multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial done in 18 regional centres in England and Scotland, with patients recruited from 424 primary care practices. Eligible patients were aged 60 years or older, with ischaemic heart disease but no history of gout. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1), using a central web-based randomisation system accessed via a web-based application or an interactive voice response system, to receive oral allopurinol up-titrated to a dose of 600 mg daily (300 mg daily in participants with moderate renal impairment at baseline) or to continue usual care. The primary outcome was the composite cardiovascular endpoint of non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or cardiovascular death. The hazard ratio (allopurinol vs usual care) in a Cox proportional hazards model was assessed for superiority in a modified intention-to-treat analysis (excluding randomly assigned patients later found to have met one of the exclusion criteria). The safety analysis population included all patients in the modified intention-to-treat usual care group and those who took at least one dose of randomised medication in the allopurinol group. This study is registered with the EU Clinical Trials Register, EudraCT 2013-003559-39, and ISRCTN, ISRCTN32017426. FINDINGS: Between Feb 7, 2014, and Oct 2, 2017, 5937 participants were enrolled and then randomly assigned to receive allopurinol or usual care. After exclusion of 216 patients after randomisation, 5721 participants (mean age 72·0 years [SD 6·8], 4321 [75·5%] males, and 5676 [99·2%] white) were included in the modified intention-to-treat population, with 2853 in the allopurinol group and 2868 in the usual care group. Mean follow-up time in the study was 4·8 years (1·5). There was no evidence of a difference between the randomised treatment groups in the rates of the primary endpoint. 314 (11·0%) participants in the allopurinol group (2·47 events per 100 patient-years) and 325 (11·3%) in the usual care group (2·37 events per 100 patient-years) had a primary endpoint (hazard ratio [HR] 1·04 [95% CI 0·89-1·21], p=0·65). 288 (10·1%) participants in the allopurinol group and 303 (10·6%) participants in the usual care group died from any cause (HR 1·02 [95% CI 0·87-1·20], p=0·77). INTERPRETATION: In this large, randomised clinical trial in patients aged 60 years or older with ischaemic heart disease but no history of gout, there was no difference in the primary outcome of non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or cardiovascular death between participants randomised to allopurinol therapy and those randomised to usual care. FUNDING: UK National Institute for Health and Care Research.

Health Status after Invasive or Conservative Care in Coronary and Advanced Kidney Disease.

BACKGROUND: In the ISCHEMIA-CKD trial, the primary analysis showed no significant difference in the risk of death or myocardial infarction with initial angiography and revascularization plus guideline-based medical therapy (invasive strategy) as compared with guideline-based medical therapy alone (conservative strategy) in participants with stable ischemic heart disease, moderate or severe ischemia, and advanced chronic kidney disease (an estimated glomerular filtration rate of <30 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 or receipt of dialysis). A secondary objective of the trial was to assess angina-related health status. METHODS: We assessed health status with the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) before randomization and at 1.5, 3, and 6 months and every 6 months thereafter. The primary outcome of this analysis was the SAQ Summary score (ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating less frequent angina and better function and quality of life). Mixed-effects cumulative probability models within a Bayesian framework were used to estimate the treatment effect with the invasive strategy. RESULTS: Health status was assessed in 705 of 777 participants. Nearly half the participants (49%) had had no angina during the month before randomization. At 3 months, the estimated mean difference between the invasive-strategy group and the conservative-strategy group in the SAQ Summary score was 2.1 points (95% credible interval, -0.4 to 4.6), a result that favored the invasive strategy. The mean difference in score at 3 months was largest among participants with daily or weekly angina at baseline (10.1 points; 95% credible interval, 0.0 to 19.9), smaller among those with monthly angina at baseline (2.2 points; 95% credible interval, -2.0 to 6.2), and nearly absent among those without angina at baseline (0.6 points; 95% credible interval, -1.9 to 3.3). By 6 months, the between-group difference in the overall trial population was attenuated (0.5 points; 95% credible interval, -2.2 to 3.4). CONCLUSIONS: Participants with stable ischemic heart disease, moderate or severe ischemia, and advanced chronic kidney disease did not have substantial or sustained benefits with regard to angina-related health status with an initially invasive strategy as compared with a conservative strategy. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; ISCHEMIA-CKD ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01985360.).

Management of Coronary Disease in Patients with Advanced Kidney Disease.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials that have assessed the effect of revascularization in patients with stable coronary disease have routinely excluded those with advanced chronic kidney disease. METHODS: We randomly assigned 777 patients with advanced kidney disease and moderate or severe ischemia on stress testing to be treated with an initial invasive strategy consisting of coronary angiography and revascularization (if appropriate) added to medical therapy or an initial conservative strategy consisting of medical therapy alone and angiography reserved for those in whom medical therapy had failed. The primary outcome was a composite of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction. A key secondary outcome was a composite of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure, or resuscitated cardiac arrest. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 2.2 years, a primary outcome event had occurred in 123 patients in the invasive-strategy group and in 129 patients in the conservative-strategy group (estimated 3-year event rate, 36.4% vs. 36.7%; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79 to 1.29; P = 0.95). Results for the key secondary outcome were similar (38.5% vs. 39.7%; hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.29). The invasive strategy was associated with a higher incidence of stroke than the conservative strategy (hazard ratio, 3.76; 95% CI, 1.52 to 9.32; P = 0.004) and with a higher incidence of death or initiation of dialysis (hazard ratio, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.11; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with stable coronary disease, advanced chronic kidney disease, and moderate or severe ischemia, we did not find evidence that an initial invasive strategy, as compared with an initial conservative strategy, reduced the risk of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others; ISCHEMIA-CKD ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01985360.).

No robust reduction of infarct size and no-reflow by metoprolol pretreatment in adult Göttingen minipigs.

Whereas prior experiments in juvenile pigs had reported infarct size reduction by intravenous metoprolol early during myocardial ischaemia, two major clinical trials in patients with reperfused acute myocardial infarction were equivocal. We, therefore, went back and tested the translational robustness of infarct size reduction by metoprolol in minipigs. Using a power analysis-based prospective design, we pretreated 20 anaesthetised adult Göttingen minipigs with 1 mg kg-1 metoprolol or placebo and subjected them to 60-min coronary occlusion and 180-min reperfusion. Primary endpoint was infarct size (triphenyl tetrazolium chloride staining) as a fraction of area at risk; no-reflow area (thioflavin-S staining) was a secondary endpoint. There was no significant reduction in infarct size (46 ± 8% of area at risk with metoprolol vs. 42 ± 8% with placebo) or area of no-reflow (19 ± 21% of infarct size with metoprolol vs. 15 ± 23% with placebo). However, the inverse relationship between infarct size and ischaemic regional myocardial blood flow was modestly, but significantly shifted downwards with metoprolol, whereas ischaemic blood flow tended to be reduced by metoprolol. With an additional dose of 1 mg kg-1 metoprolol after 30-min ischaemia in 4 additional pigs, infarct size was also not reduced (54 ± 9% vs. 46 ± 8% in 3 contemporary placebo, n.s.), and area of no-reflow tended to be increased (59 ± 20% vs. 29 ± 12%, n.s.).Infarct size reduction by metoprolol in pigs is not robust, and this result reflects the equivocal clinical trials. The lack of infarct size reduction may be the result of opposite effects of reduced infarct size at any given blood flow and reduced blood flow, possibly through unopposed alpha-adrenergic coronary vasoconstriction.

SGLT2-inhibitors effects on the coronary fibrous cap thickness and MACEs in diabetic patients with inducible myocardial ischemia and multi vessels non-obstructive coronary artery stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2-I) could modulate atherosclerotic plaque progression, via down-regulation of inflammatory burden, and lead to reduction of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD). T2DM patients with multivessel non-obstructive coronary stenosis (Mv-NOCS) have over-inflammation and over-lipids' plaque accumulation. This could reduce fibrous cap thickness (FCT), favoring plaque rupture and MACEs. Despite this, there is not conclusive data about the effects of SGLT2-I on atherosclerotic plaque phenotype and MACEs in Mv-NOCS patients with T2DM. Thus, in the current study, we evaluated SGLT2-I effects on Mv-NOCS patients with T2DM in terms of FCT increase, reduction of systemic and coronary plaque inflammation, and MACEs at 1 year of follow-up. METHODS: In a multi-center study, we evaluated 369 T2DM patients with Mv-NOCS divided in 258 (69.9%) patients that did not receive the SGLT2-I therapy (Non-SGLT2-I users), and 111 (30.1%) patients that were treated with SGLT2-I therapy (SGLT2-I users) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) evaluation. As the primary study endpoint, we evaluated the effects of SGLT2-I on FCT changes at 1 year of follow-up. As secondary endpoints, we evaluated at baseline and at 12 months follow-up the inflammatory systemic and plaque burden and rate of MACEs, and predictors of MACE through multivariable analysis. RESULTS: At 6 and 12 months of follow-up, SGLT2-I users vs. Non-SGLT2-I users showed lower body mass index (BMI), glycemia, glycated hemoglobin, B-type natriuretic peptide, and inflammatory cells/molecules values (p < 0.05). SGLT2-I users vs. Non-SGLT2-I users, as evaluated by OCT, evidenced the highest values of minimum FCT, and lowest values of lipid arc degree and macrophage grade (p < 0.05). At the follow-up end, SGLT2-I users vs. Non-SGLT2-I users had a lower rate of MACEs [n 12 (10.8%) vs. n 57 (22.1%); p < 0.05]. Finally, Hb1Ac values (1.930, [CI 95%: 1.149-2.176]), macrophage grade (1.188, [CI 95%: 1.073-1.315]), and SGLT2-I therapy (0.342, [CI 95%: 0.180-0.651]) were independent predictors of MACEs at 1 year of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: SGLT2-I therapy may reduce about 65% the risk to have MACEs at 1 year of follow-up, via ameliorative effects on glucose homeostasis, and by the reduction of systemic inflammatory burden, and local effects on the atherosclerotic plaque inflammation, lipids' deposit, and FCT in Mv-NOCS patients with T2DM.

Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction: What Clinicians and Investigators Should Know.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Abnormal structure and function of the coronary microvasculature have been implicated in the pathophysiology of multiple cardiovascular disease processes. This article reviews recent research progress related to coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) and salient clinical takeaways. RECENT FINDINGS: CMD is prevalent in patients with signs and symptoms of ischemia and no obstructive epicardial coronary artery disease (INOCA), particularly in women. CMD is associated with adverse outcomes, including most frequently the development of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. It is also associated with adverse outcomes in patient populations including hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, dilated cardiomyopathy, and acute coronary syndromes. In patients with INOCA, stratified medical therapy guided by invasive coronary function testing to define the subtype of CMD leads to improved symptoms. There are invasive and non-invasive methodologies to diagnose CMD that provide prognostic information and mechanistic information to direct treatment. Available treatments improve symptoms and myocardial blood flow; ongoing investigations aim to develop therapy to improve adverse outcomes related to CMD.

Trimetazidine Affects Mitochondrial Calcium Uniporter Expression to Restore Ischemic Heart Function via Reactive Oxygen Species/NFκB Pathway Inhibition.

ABSTRACT: Studies have demonstrated the roles of trimetazidine beyond being an antianginal agent in ischemic heart disease (IHD) treatment associated with mechanisms of calcium regulation. Our recent studies revealed that mitochondrial calcium uniporter (MCU, the pore-forming unit responsible for mitochondrial calcium entrance) inhibition provided cardioprotective effects for failing hearts. Because trimetazidine and MCU are associated with calcium homeostasis, we hypothesized that trimetazidine may affect MCU to restore the failing heart function. In the present study, we tested this hypothesis in the context of cardiac ischemia in vivo and in vitro. The IHD model was established in male C57BL/6 mice followed by trimetazidine administration intraperitoneally at 20 mg/kg q.o.d for 8 weeks. In vitro studies were performed in a hypoxia model using primary rat neonate cardiomyocytes. The mice survival outcomes and heart function, pathohistologic, and biological changes were analyzed. The results demonstrated that trimetazidine treatment resulted in longer life spans and heart function improvement accompanied by restoration of mitochondrial calcium levels and increase in ATP production via MCU down-regulation. Studies in vitro further showed that trimetazidine treatment and MCU inhibition decreased reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, inhibited the NFκB pathway, and protected the cardiomyocytes from hypoxic injury, and vice versa. Thus, the present study unveils a unique mechanism in which trimetazidine is involved in ameliorating the ischemic failing heart via MCU down-regulation and the following mitochondrial calcium homeostasis restoration, ROS reduction, and cardiomyocyte protection through NFκB pathway inhibition. This mechanism provides a novel explanation for the treatment effects of trimetazidine on IHD.

Nicorandil Suppresses Ischemia-Induced Norepinephrine Release and Ventricular Arrhythmias in Hypertrophic Hearts.

PURPOSE: Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are a common cause of sudden death in acute myocardial infarction (MI), for which hypertension is a major risk factor. Nicorandil opens ATP-sensitive potassium (KATP) channels, which are expressed by nerve terminals and cardiomyocytes and regulate the release of norepinephrine (NE). However, the effects of nicorandil on ischemic NE release in cardiac tissue remain unclear. Therefore, we herein investigated whether nicorandil suppressed interstitial NE concentrations and VAs during acute MI in pressure overload-induced hypertrophic hearts. METHODS: Rats were divided into two groups: an abdominal aortic constriction (AAC) group and sham-operated (Sham) group. Four weeks after constriction, cardiac geometry and functions were examined using echocardiography and hemodynamic analyses. Myocardial ischemia was induced by coronary artery occlusion for 100 min with or without the administration of nicorandil. VAs were assessed by electrocardiography, and NE concentrations in the ischemic region were measured using a micro-dialysis method. RESULTS: AAC induced left ventricular hypertrophy with diastolic dysfunction. VAs markedly increased in the early phase (0-20 min) of ischemia in both groups and were more frequent in the AAC group. Cardiac interstitial NE concentrations were higher in the AAC group before ischemia and significantly increased during ischemia in both groups. Nicorandil significantly suppressed ischemia-induced VAs and NE increases in the AAC group. CONCLUSION: Ischemia-induced VAs were more frequent in hypertrophic hearts and associated with high interstitial concentrations of NE. The attenuation of ischemia-induced increases in NE through neuronal KATP opening by nicorandil may suppress ischemia-induced VAs in hypertrophic hearts.

Treatment inequity in antiplatelet therapy for ischaemic heart disease in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease: releasing the evidence vacuum.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a global health problem and an independent risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Despite evidence-based therapies significantly improving cardiovascular mortality outcomes in the general population and those with non-dialysis-dependent CKD, this risk reduction has not translated to patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Absent from all major antiplatelet trials, this has led to insufficient safety data for P2Y12 inhibitor prescriptions and treatment inequity in this subpopulation. This review article presents an overview of the progression of research in understanding antiplatelet therapy for ischaemic heart disease in patients with advanced CKD (defined as eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2). Beyond trial recruitment strategies, new approaches should focus on registry documentation by CKD stage, risk stratification with biomarkers associated with inflammation and haemorrhage and building a knowledge base on optimal duration of dual and single antiplatelet therapies.

What is the context? Patients with kidney disease are more likely to experience a heart attack than those without.Those with advanced kidney disease have a higher risk of death following a heart attack.Over the past two decades, advances in treatment following a heart attack have reduced the risk of death, however this has not translated to those with advanced kidney disease.Progression of kidney disease influences antiplatelet (e.g. clopidogrel) treatment efficacy.What is new?This contemporary review analyses registry and trial data to highlight some of the issues surrounding treatment inequity in patients with advanced kidney disease.This article describes potential mechanisms by which progression of kidney disease can influence clotting, bleeding and antiplatelet treatments.What is the impact?Further research into antiplatelet therapy for patients with advanced kidney disease is required.Registry and trial data can improve upon classification of kidney disease for future research.Future trials in antiplatelet therapy for advanced kidney disease are anticipated.

Adverse Events Associated With Coprescription of Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors and Oral Organic Nitrates in Male Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease : A Case-Crossover Study.

BACKGROUND: Concomitant use of oral organic nitrates (nitrates) and phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors is contraindicated. OBJECTIVE: To measure temporal trends in the coprescription of nitrates and PDE5 inhibitors and to measure the association between cardiovascular outcomes and the coprescription of nitrates with PDE5 inhibitors. DESIGN: Case-crossover design. SETTING: Nationwide study of Danish patients from 2000 to 2018. PATIENTS: Male patients with International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes for ischemic heart disease (IHD), including those who had a continuing prescription for nitrates and a new, filled prescription for PDE5 inhibitors. MEASUREMENTS: Two composite outcomes were measured: 1) cardiac arrest, shock, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or acute coronary arteriography and 2) syncope, angina pectoris, or drug-related adverse event. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2018, 249 541 male patients with IHD were identified. Of these, 42 073 patients had continuing prescriptions for nitrates. During this period, the prescription rate for PDE5 inhibitors in patients with IHD who were taking nitrates increased from an average of 0.9 prescriptions (95% CI, 0.5 to 1.2 prescriptions) per 100 persons per year in 2000 to 19.5 prescriptions (CI, 18.0 to 21.1 prescriptions) in 2018. No statistically significant association was found between the coprescription of nitrates with PDE5 inhibitors and the risk for either composite outcome (odds ratio [OR], 0.58 [CI, 0.28 to 1.13] for the first outcome and OR, 0.73 [CI, 0.40 to 1.32] for the second outcome). LIMITATION: An assumption was made that concurrently filled prescriptions for nitrates and PDE5 inhibitors equaled concomitant use. CONCLUSION: From 2000 to 2018, the use of PDE5 inhibitors increased 20-fold among Danish patients with IHD who were taking nitrates. A statistically significant association between concomitant use of these medications and cardiovascular adverse events could not be identified. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Ib Mogens Kristiansens Almene Fond and Helsefonden.

Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors and Oral Nitrates in Male Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review sought to define the mechanism of the drug-drug interaction between phosphodiesterase-type-5 (PDE-5) inhibitors and organic nitrates as well as the clinical impact and recommended management across different clinical scenarios. RECENT FINDINGS: This drug-drug interaction results in hemodynamically significant hypotension during episodic PDE-5 use and acute nitrate administration mainly during cardiovascular emergencies with multiple studies describing the expected impact. Chronic co-administration of long-acting nitrates and PDE-5 inhibitors has been observed in practice in a small percentage of patients despite the labeled contraindication without noted adverse effects. Acute nitrate therapy should be avoided in the context of episodic PDE-5 exposure, likely identified through systematic processes. Few data exist defining risk with lower-intensity daily PDE-5 administration. Chronic co-administration is not recommended but may be navigated with careful risk-benefit determination. Future directions also aim to identify potential areas where nitrate synergy may achieve clinical benefit.