Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 160
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
Occup Environ Med ; 80(12): 694-701, 2023 Nov 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37984917

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to present an overview of the formal recognition of COVID-19 as occupational disease (OD) or injury (OI) across Europe. METHODS: A COVID-19 questionnaire was designed by a task group within COST-funded OMEGA-NET and sent to occupational health experts of 37 countries in WHO European region, with a last update in April 2022. RESULTS: The questionnaire was filled out by experts from 35 countries. There are large differences between national systems regarding the recognition of OD and OI: 40% of countries have a list system, 57% a mixed system and one country an open system. In most countries, COVID-19 can be recognised as an OD (57%). In four countries, COVID-19 can be recognised as OI (11%) and in seven countries as either OD or OI (20%). In two countries, there is no recognition possible to date. Thirty-two countries (91%) recognise COVID-19 as OD/OI among healthcare workers. Working in certain jobs is considered proof of occupational exposure in 25 countries, contact with a colleague with confirmed infection in 19 countries, and contact with clients with confirmed infection in 21 countries. In most countries (57%), a positive PCR test is considered proof of disease. The three most common compensation benefits for COVID-19 as OI/OD are disability pension, treatment and rehabilitation. Long COVID is included in 26 countries. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 can be recognised as OD or OI in 94% of the European countries completing this survey, across different social security and embedded occupational health systems.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Occupational Diseases , Occupational Exposure , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome , Europe/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/therapy , Occupations , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects
2.
Am J Ind Med ; 63(3): 240-248, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31828843

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Night shift work is associated with cardiovascular disease, but its associations with cardiovascular disease biomarkers are unclear. We investigated these associations in a study of female nurses. METHODS: We used data from the Nurses' Health Study II for total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, C-reactive protein (CRP), and fibrinogen. The sample sizes for our analysis ranged from 458 (fibrinogen) to 3574 (total cholesterol). From questionnaires, we determined the number of night shifts worked in the 2 weeks before blood collection and total years of rotating night shift work. We used quantile regression to estimate differences in biomarker levels by shift work history, adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: Nurses working 1 to 4 recent night shifts had median HDL cholesterol levels 4.4 mg/dL (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.3, 7.5) lower than nurses without recent night shifts. However, working ≥5 recent night shifts and years of rotating night shift work were not associated with HDL cholesterol. There was no association between recent night shifts and CRP, but median CRP levels were 0.1 (95% CI: 0.0, 0.2), 0.2 (95% CI: 0.1, 0.4), and 0.2 (95% CI: 0.0, 0.4) mg/L higher among nurses working rotating night shifts for 1 to 5, 6 to 9, and ≥10 years compared with nurses never working rotating night shifts. These associations were attenuated when excluding postmenopausal women and women taking statins. We observed no associations between night shift work and other biomarkers. CONCLUSIONS: We found suggestive evidence of adverse short-term and long-term effects of night shift work on select cardiovascular disease biomarkers.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Chronobiology Disorders/blood , Nurses/statistics & numerical data , Occupational Diseases/blood , Shift Work Schedule/adverse effects , Adult , Biomarkers/blood , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Cholesterol/blood , Cholesterol, HDL/blood , Cholesterol, LDL/blood , Chronobiology Disorders/etiology , Female , Fibrinogen/analysis , Heart Disease Risk Factors , Humans , Middle Aged , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Triglycerides/blood , Work Schedule Tolerance/physiology
3.
Int J Neurosci ; 130(7): 727-735, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31870202

ABSTRACT

Aim of the study: We conducted a systematic review on existing literature in humans and animals, linking the gut microbiome with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Additionally, we sought to explore the role of the bacterially produced metabolite butyrate as well as of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in these associations.Materials and methods: Following PRISMA guidelines for systematic literature reviews, four databases (Medline, Scopus, Embase and Web of Science) were searched and screened by two independent reviewers against defined inclusion criteria. Six studies in humans and six animal studies were identified, summarized and reviewed.Results: Overall, the evidence accrued to date is supportive of changes in the gut microbiome being associated with ALS risk, and potentially progression, though observational studies are small (describing a total of 145 patients with ALS across all published studies), and not entirely conclusive.Conclusions: With emerging studies beginning to apply metagenome sequencing, more clarity regarding the importance and promise of the gut microbiome in ALS can be expected. Future studies may also help establish the therapeutic potential of butyrate, and the role of PPIs in these associations.


Subject(s)
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis , Butyrates/metabolism , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/physiology , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/drug therapy , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/metabolism , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/microbiology , Animals , Disease Progression , Humans
4.
Eur J Epidemiol ; 34(7): 625-635, 2019 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31081539

ABSTRACT

We investigated the relationship between maternal history of nightshift work before and shift work during pregnancy and offspring risk of depression and anxiety, among mothers participating in the Nurses Health Study II and in their offspring enrolled in the Growing Up Today Study 2 between 2004 and 2013. Case definitions were based on offspring self-reports of physician/clinician-diagnosed depression and/or anxiety, regular antidepressant use and depressive symptoms assessed using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. Multivariable-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using generalized estimating equation models. We found no associations between maternal nightshift work before pregnancy or during pregnancy and offspring mental health disorders (e.g., nightshift work before pregnancy: depression (based on physician/clinician diagnosis): ORever nightwork = 1.14; 95% CI, 0.88-1.47; either depression or anxiety: ORever nightwork = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.81-1.08; nightshift work during pregnancy: depression: ORever nightwork = 1.14; 95% CI, 0.68-1.94; depression or anxiety: ORever nightwork =1.17; 95% CI, 0.70-1.98) and no dose-response relationship with longer history of nightshift work (all PTrend >0.10). Stratifying by maternal chronotype revealed a higher risk of depression for offspring whose mothers worked nightshifts before pregnancy and reported being definite morning chronotypes (a proxy for circadian strain) (ORever nightwork = 1.95; 95% CI, 1.17, 3.24 vs. ORever nightwork = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.68, 1.28 for any other chronotype; PInteraction = 0.03). Further studies replicating our findings and refined understanding regarding the interplay of nightshift work and chronotype and its potential influences on offspring mental health are needed.


Subject(s)
Adult Children/psychology , Anxiety/epidemiology , Chronobiology Disorders , Depression/epidemiology , Mothers/psychology , Shift Work Schedule/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Anxiety/physiopathology , Depression/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Male , Pregnancy , Risk Factors , Young Adult
5.
Occup Environ Med ; 76(10): 733-738, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31405910

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Night shift work has been suggested as a possible risk factor for multiple sclerosis (MS). The objective of the present analysis was to prospectively evaluate the association of rotating night shift work history and MS risk in two female cohorts, the Nurses' Health Study (NHS) and NHSII. METHODS: A total of 83 992 (NHS) and 114 427 (NHSII) women were included in this analysis. We documented 579 (109 in NHS and 470 in NHSII) incident physician-confirmed MS cases (moderate and definite diagnosis), including 407 definite MS cases. The history (cumulative years) of rotating night shifts (≥3 nights/month) was assessed at baseline and updated throughout follow-up. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate HRs and 95% CIs for the association between rotating night shift work and MS risk adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: We observed no association between history of rotating night shift work and MS risk in NHS (1-9 years: HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.54; 10+ years: 1.15, 0.62 to 2.15) and NHSII (1-9 years: HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.09; 10+ years: 1.03, 0.72 to 1.49). In NHSII, rotating night shift work history of 20+ years was significantly associated with MS risk, when restricting to definite MS cases (1-9 years: HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.11; 10-19 years: 0.98, 0.62 to 1.55; 20+ years: 2.62, 1.06 to 6.46). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, we found no association between rotating night shift work history and MS risk in these two large cohorts of nurses. In NHSII, shift work history of 20 or more years was associated with an increased risk of definite MS diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Multiple Sclerosis/epidemiology , Nurses/statistics & numerical data , Shift Work Schedule/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Time Factors , United States/epidemiology
6.
Int J Cancer ; 143(11): 2709-2717, 2018 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29978466

ABSTRACT

Animal and human data have suggested that shift work involving circadian disruption may be carcinogenic for humans, but epidemiological evidence for colorectal cancer remains limited. We investigated the association of rotating night shift work and colorectal cancer risk in two prospective female cohorts, the Nurses' Health Study (NHS) and NHS2, with 24 years of follow-up. In total, 190,810 women (NHS = 77,439; NHS2 = 113,371) were included in this analysis, and 1,965 incident colorectal cancer cases (NHS = 1,527; NHS2 = 438) were reported during followup (NHS: 1988-2012, NHS2: 1989-2013). We used Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for a wide range of potential confounders. We did not observe an association between rotating night work duration and colorectal cancer risk in these cohorts (NHS: 1-14 years: Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.04, 95% CI: 0.94, 1.16; 15+ years: HR 1.15, 95% CI: 0.95, 1.39; Ptrend = 0.14 and NHS2: 1-14 years: HR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.66, 0.99; 15+ years: HR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.56, 1.64 and Ptrend = 0.88). In subsite analysis in NHS, rectal cancer risk increased after long-term (15+ years) rotating night shift work (proximal colon cancer: HR 1.00, 95% CI: 0.75, 1.34, Ptrend = 0.90; distal colon cancer: HR 1.27, 95% CI: 0.87, 1.85, Ptrend = 0.32; rectal cancer: HR 1.60, 95% CI: 1.09, 2.34, Ptrend = 0.02). We found no overall evidence of an association between rotating night shift work and colorectal cancer risk in these two large cohorts of nurses. Risk for rectal cancer significantly increased with shift work duration, suggesting that long-term circadian disruption may play a role in rectal cancer development.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/etiology , Shift Work Schedule/adverse effects , Work Schedule Tolerance/physiology , Adult , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Nurses , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors
8.
Am J Epidemiol ; 186(5): 532-540, 2017 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28541391

ABSTRACT

In 2007, the International Agency for Research on Cancer declared shift work that involved circadian disruption to be a "probable" carcinogen (group 2A), noting that human evidence was limited. Using data from 2 prospective cohort studies, the Nurses' Health Study (1988-2012; n = 78,516) and Nurses' Health Study II (1989-2013; n = 114,559), we examined associations between rotating night-shift work and breast cancer risk. In the 2 cohorts, there were a total of 9,541 incident invasive breast malignancies and 24 years of follow-up. In the Nurses' Health Study, women with 30 years or more of shift work did not have a higher risk of breast cancer (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.95, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.77, 1.17; P for trend = 0.63) compared with those who never did shift work, although follow-up occurred primarily after retirement from shift work. Among participants in the Nurses' Health Study II, who were younger than participants in the other cohort, the risk of breast cancer was significantly higher in women with 20 years or more of shift work at baseline, reflecting young-adult exposure (HR = 2.15, 95% CI: 1.23, 3.73; P for trend = 0.23), and was marginally significantly higher for women with 20 years or more of cumulative shift work when we used updated exposure information (HR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.97; P for trend = 0.74). In conclusion, long-term rotating night-shift work was associated with a higher risk of breast cancer, particularly among women who performed shift work during young adulthood. Further studies should explore the role of shift work timing on breast cancer risk.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Circadian Rhythm , Work Schedule Tolerance , Adult , Breast Neoplasms/etiology , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Nurses/statistics & numerical data , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States/epidemiology
9.
Br J Cancer ; 116(9): 1239-1246, 2017 04 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28359077

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is a leading cause of cancer death in women. Sleep has been linked with mortality among cancer-free population; however, its association with survival among women with breast cancer is understudied. METHODS: Breast cancer patients (N=3682) reported their average sleep duration post diagnosis. Subsamples also provided their pre-diagnosis sleep duration (n=1949) and post-diagnosis sleep difficulties (n=1353). Multivariate Cox models estimated hazard ratios (HR) and confidence intervals (CI) of all-cause, breast cancer, and non-breast cancer mortality. RESULTS: At diagnosis, the mean age was 64.9 years and 91.7% were stage I or II. Women sleeping ⩾9 h per night post diagnosis had a strong higher risk of all-cause (multivariate HRs: MV-HR=1.37, CI=1.10-1.71), breast cancer (MV-HR=1.46, CI=1.02-2.07), and non-breast cancer mortality (MV-HR=1.34, CI=1.01-1.79), compared to women sleeping 8 h per night. Increased sleep duration post diagnosis (vs unchanged) and regular sleep difficulties (vs rare/none) were associated with a strong elevated risk of all-cause mortality (MV-HRincreased duration=1.35, CI=1.04-1.74; MV-HRregular difficulties=1.49, CI=1.02-2.19) and a moderate greater risk of breast cancer and non-breast cancer mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Various facets of sleep were associated with higher all-cause mortality risk. If replicated, these findings support evaluation of breast cancer patients' sleep duration and difficulties to identify those at risk for poorer outcomes.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/physiopathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/physiopathology , Sleep/physiology , Adult , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Proportional Hazards Models , Risk Factors , Time Factors
10.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 32(7): 1013-1018, 2017 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28097381

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study aims to investigate the associations of rotating night shift work history and sleep duration with risk of colorectal adenoma. METHODS: We evaluated 56,275 cancer-free participants of the Nurses' Health Study II, who had their first colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy between 1991 and 2011; rotating night shift work and sleep duration were reported by mailed questionnaire. Multivariable-adjusted logistic regression was used to estimate relative risks (RR) of colorectal adenoma, with 95% confidence intervals (CI), across categories of rotating night shift work history (none, 1-4, 5-9, and ≥10 years) and sleep duration (≤5, 6, 7, 8, and ≥9 h/day). RESULTS: We found no association between duration of rotating night shift work and occurrence of colorectal adenoma (p-trend across shift work categories = 0.5). Women with the longest durations of rotating night shift work (≥10 years) had a similar risk of adenoma compared to women without a history of rotating night shift work (multivariable-adjusted RR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.83-1.11). Similarly, there were no associations of shorter or longer sleep durations with adenoma risk (p-trend = 0.2 across sleep durations of ≤5 through 7 h/day and p-trend = 0.5 across sleep durations of 7 through ≥9 h/day). Results were similar when we examined associations according to adenoma location and subtype. CONCLUSIONS: Our results do not support an association between rotating night shift work or sleep duration and risk of colorectal adenoma in women.


Subject(s)
Adenoma/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Shift Work Schedule/statistics & numerical data , Sleep , Adult , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Risk , Risk Factors
11.
Occup Environ Med ; 74(3): 169-175, 2017 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27663986

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Night shift work and sleep duration have been associated with breast and other cancers. Results from the few prior studies of night shift work and skin cancer risk have been mixed and not fully accounted for other potentially important health-related variables (eg, sleep characteristics). This study evaluated the relationship between rotating night shift work and skin cancer risk and included additional skin cancer risk factors and sleep-related variables. METHODS: The current study used data from 74 323 Nurses' Health Study (NHS) II participants. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate multivariable-adjusted HRs and 95% CIs for skin cancers across categories of shift work and sleep duration. RESULTS: Over 10 years of follow-up, 4308 basal cell carcinoma (BCC), 334 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and 212 melanoma cases were identified. Longer duration of rotating night shifts was associated with a linear decline in risk of BCC (HR=0.93, 95% CI 0.90 to 0.97 per 5-year increase). Shift work was not significantly associated with either melanoma (HR=1.02, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.21) or SCC (HR=0.92, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.06). A short sleep duration (≤6 hours per day) was associated with lower risks of melanoma (HR=0.68, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.98) and BCC (HR=0.93, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.00) compared with the most common report of 7 hours. SCC was not associated with duration of sleep (HR=0.94, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.06). CONCLUSIONS: Longer duration of rotating night shift work and shorter sleep duration were associated with lower risk of some skin cancers. Further research is needed to confirm and identify the mechanisms underlying these associations.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Basal Cell/etiology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/etiology , Melanoma/etiology , Skin Neoplasms/etiology , Sleep , Work Schedule Tolerance , Adult , Carcinoma, Basal Cell/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Melanoma/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Nurses , Proportional Hazards Models , Risk Factors , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Sleep/physiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , United States/epidemiology
12.
Neuroepidemiology ; 46(1): 57-78, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26735553

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Increasing evidence suggests that circadian and sleep parameters influence cognitive function with aging. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate observational studies of sleep duration and cognition in older adults. DATA SOURCES: A systematic review of OVID Medline and PsycINFO through September 2015, and review of bibliographies from studies identified. STUDY SELECTION: English-language articles reporting observational studies of sleep duration and cognitive function in older populations. DATA EXTRACTION: Data extraction by 2 authors using predefined categories of desired information. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies met our inclusion criteria, with nearly two-thirds published in the past 4 years. One-third of studies indicated that extreme sleep durations were associated with worse cognition in older adults. More studies favored an association with long vs. short sleep durations (35 vs. 26% of studies, respectively). Four studies found that greater changes in sleep duration over time were related to lower cognition. Study design and analytic methods were very heterogeneous across studies; therefore, meta-analysis was not undertaken. LIMITATIONS: We reviewed English-language manuscripts only, with a qualitative summary of studies identified. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS: Observational studies of sleep duration and cognitive function in older adults have produced mixed results, with more studies suggesting that long (rather than short) sleep durations are related to worse cognition. Studies more consistently indicate that greater changes in sleep duration are associated with poor cognition. Future studies should be prospectively designed, with objective sleep assessment and longer follow-up periods; intervention studies are also needed to identify strategies for promoting cognitive health with aging.


Subject(s)
Aging/psychology , Cognition Disorders/complications , Cognition/physiology , Sleep Wake Disorders/complications , Sleep/physiology , Aged , Humans
13.
JAMA ; 315(16): 1726-34, 2016 Apr 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27115377

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: Prospective studies linking shift work to coronary heart disease (CHD) have been inconsistent and limited by short follow-up. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether rotating night shift work is associated with CHD risk. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective cohort study of 189,158 initially healthy women followed up over 24 years in the Nurses' Health Studies (NHS [1988-2012]: N = 73,623 and NHS2 [1989-2013]: N = 115,535). EXPOSURES: Lifetime history of rotating night shift work (≥3 night shifts per month in addition to day and evening shifts) at baseline (updated every 2 to 4 years in the NHS2). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Incident CHD; ie, nonfatal myocardial infarction, CHD death, angiogram-confirmed angina pectoris, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, stents, and angioplasty. RESULTS: During follow-up, 7303 incident CHD cases occurred in the NHS (mean age at baseline, 54.5 years) and 3519 in the NHS2 (mean age, 34.8 years). In multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models, increasing years of baseline rotating night shift work was associated with significantly higher CHD risk in both cohorts. In the NHS, the association between duration of shift work and CHD was stronger in the first half of follow-up than in the second half (P=.02 for interaction), suggesting waning risk after cessation of shift work. Longer time since quitting shift work was associated with decreased CHD risk among ever shift workers in the NHS2 (P<.001 for trend). [table: see text] CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among women who worked as registered nurses, longer duration of rotating night shift work was associated with a statistically significant but small absolute increase in CHD risk. Further research is needed to explore whether the association is related to specific work hours and individual characteristics.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease/epidemiology , Nurses/statistics & numerical data , Work Schedule Tolerance , Adult , Coronary Artery Disease/etiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Middle Aged , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling/statistics & numerical data , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , United States/epidemiology
14.
Am J Epidemiol ; 181(3): 155-62, 2015 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25587174

ABSTRACT

Experimental and epidemiologic data support a protective role for melatonin in breast cancer etiology, yet studies in premenopausal women are scarce. In a case-control study nested within the Nurses' Health Study II cohort, we measured the concentration of melatonin's major urinary metabolite, 6-sulfatoxymelatonin (aMT6s), in urine samples collected between 1996 and 1999 among 600 breast cancer cases and 786 matched controls. Cases were predominantly premenopausal women who were diagnosed with incident breast cancer after urine collection and before June 1, 2007. Using multivariable conditional logistic regression, we computed odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Melatonin levels were not significantly associated with total breast cancer risk (for the fourth (top) quartile (Q4) of aMT6s vs. the first (bottom) quartile (Q1), odds ratio (OR) = 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.64, 1.28; Ptrend = 0.38) or risk of invasive or in situ breast cancer. Findings did not vary by body mass index, smoking status, menopausal status, or time between urine collection and diagnosis (all Pinteraction values ≥ 0.12). For example, the odds ratio for total breast cancer among women with ≤5 years between urine collection and diagnosis was 0.74 (Q4 vs. Q1; 95% CI: 0.45, 1.20; Ptrend = 0.09), and it was 1.20 (Q4 vs. Q1; 95% CI: 0.72, 1.98; Ptrend = 0.70) for women with >5 years. Our data do not support an overall association between urinary melatonin levels and breast cancer risk.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/urine , Melatonin/analogs & derivatives , Adult , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Melatonin/urine , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , United States/epidemiology
15.
Am J Epidemiol ; 181(10): 808-16, 2015 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25925389

ABSTRACT

The relationship between Parkinson disease (PD) and smoking has been examined in several studies, but little is known about smoking in conjunction with other behaviors and a family history of PD. Using unconditional logistic regression analysis, we studied individual and joint associations of these factors with idiopathic PD among 1,808 Danish patients who were diagnosed in 1996-2009 and matched to 1,876 randomly selected population controls. Although there was a downward trend in duration of smoking, this was not observed for daily tobacco consumption. A moderate intake of caffeine (3.1-5 cups/day) was associated with a lower odds ratio for PD (0.45, 95% confidence interval: 0.34, 0.62), as was a moderate intake of alcohol (3.1-7 units/week) (odds ratio = 0.60, 95% confidence interval: 0.58, 0.84); a higher daily intake did not reduce the odds further. When these behaviors were studied in combination with smoking, the odds ratios were lower than those for each one alone. Compared with never smokers with no family history of PD, never smokers who did have a family history had an odds ratio of 2.81 (95% confidence interval: 1.91, 4.13); for smokers with a family history, the odds ratio was 1.60 (95% confidence interval: 1.15, 2.23). In conclusion, duration of smoking seems to be more important than intensity in the relationship between smoking and idiopathic PD. The finding of lower risk estimates for smoking in combination with caffeine or alcohol requires further confirmation.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking , Caffeine , Parkinson Disease/epidemiology , Smoking , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Denmark/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Parkinson Disease/prevention & control , Risk , Smoking/adverse effects , Smoking/epidemiology
16.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 150(1): 219-29, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25701121

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether antihypertensive medication use, including long-term use, is associated with increased breast cancer incidence in women. We studied 210,641 U.S. registered nurses participating in the Nurses' Health Study (NHS) and Nurses' Health Study II (NHS II). Information on antihypertensive medication use was collected on biennial questionnaires in both cohorts, and breast cancer cases were ascertained during this period. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate relative risks of invasive breast cancer over follow-up (1988-2012 in NHS, 1989-2011 in NHS II) across categories of overall antihypertensive medication use and use of specific classes (diuretics, beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors). During follow-up, 10,012 cases of invasive breast cancer developed (6718 cases in NHS and 3294 in the NHS II). Overall, current use of any antihypertensive medication was not associated with breast cancer risk compared with past/never use in NHS (multivariable-adjusted relative risk = 1.00, 95 % CI = 0.95-1.06) or NHS II (multivariable-adjusted relative risk = 0.94, 95 % CI = 0.86-1.03). Furthermore, no specific class of antihypertensive medication was consistently associated with breast cancer risk. Results were similar when we considered hypertensive women only, and when we evaluated consistency and duration of medication use over time. Overall, antihypertensive medication use was largely unrelated to the risk of invasive breast cancer among women in the NHS cohorts.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/etiology , Adult , Female , Humans , Incidence , Middle Aged , Nurses , Odds Ratio , Population Surveillance , Registries , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology
17.
Occup Environ Med ; 72(2): 100-7, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25261528

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We examined the association of night shift work history and age when night shift work was performed with cancer and cardiovascular disease risk factors among 54 724 women in the Nurses' Health Study (NHS) II. METHODS: We calculated age-adjusted and socioeconomic status-adjusted means and percentages for cancer and cardiovascular risk factors in 2009 across categories of night shift work history. We used multivariable-adjusted logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs for key risk factors among 54 724 participants (72% ever shift workers). We further examined these associations by age (20-25, 26-35, 36-45 and 46+ years) at which shift work was performed. RESULTS: Ever night shift workers had increased odds of obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m(2); OR=1.37, 95% CI 1.31 to 1.43); higher caffeine intake (≥131 mg/day; OR=1.16, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.22) and total calorie intake (≥1715 kcal/day; OR=1.09, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.13); current smoking (OR=1.30, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.42); and shorter sleep durations (≤7 h of sleep/day; OR=1.19, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.24) compared to never night shift workers. These estimates varied depending on age at which night work was performed, with a suggestion that night shift work before age 25 was associated with fewer risk factors compared to night shift work at older ages. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that night shift work may contribute to an adverse chronic disease risk profile, and that risk factors may vary depending on the age at which night shift work was performed.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Energy Intake , Neoplasms/etiology , Obesity , Sleep , Smoking , Work Schedule Tolerance , Adult , Age Factors , Body Mass Index , Caffeine/administration & dosage , Chronic Disease , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Nurses , Obesity/complications , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Odds Ratio , Risk Factors , Smoking/adverse effects , Young Adult
18.
Occup Environ Med ; 72(11): 777-83, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26251064

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association of work schedule and physical factors with fecundity. METHODS: Women currently employed outside the home and trying to get pregnant (n=1739) in the Nurses' Health Study 3 cohort (2010-2014) were included in this analysis. Work schedule and physical labour were self-reported on the baseline questionnaire, and every 6 months thereafter the women reported the duration of their ongoing pregnancy attempt. Multivariable accelerated failure time models were used to estimate time ratios (TR) and 95% CIs. RESULTS: Among the 1739 women (median age=33 years, 93% Caucasian) the estimated proportions of women not pregnant after 12 and 24 months were 16% and 5%, respectively. None of the various shift work patterns were associated with duration of pregnancy attempt (as a surrogate for fecundity). However, women working >40 h/week had a 20% (95% CI 7 to 35%) longer median duration of pregnancy attempt compared to women working 21-40 h/week (p-trend=0.005). Women whose work entailed heavy lifting or moving (ie, 25+ pounds) >15 times/day also had a longer median duration of pregnancy attempt (adjusted TR=1.49; 95% CI 1.20 to 1.85) compared to women who never lifted or moved heavy loads (p-trend=0.002). The association between heavy moving and lifting and duration of pregnancy attempt was more pronounced among overweight or obese women (body mass index, BMI<25: TR=1.17; 95% CI 0.88 to 1.56; BMI≥25: TR=2.03, 95% CI 1.48 to 2.79; p-interaction=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Working greater than 40 h per week and greater frequency of lifting or moving a heavy load were associated with reduced fecundity in a cohort of nurses planning pregnancy.


Subject(s)
Fertility , Infertility, Female/etiology , Lifting/adverse effects , Nurses , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Work Schedule Tolerance , Work , Adult , Body Mass Index , Female , Humans , Obesity/complications , Pregnancy , Surveys and Questionnaires
19.
BMC Public Health ; 15: 467, 2015 May 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25943349

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Adult body mass index (BMI) has been associated with urinary melatonin levels in humans; however, whether earlier-life body size is associated with melatonin, particularly among night shift workers, remains unknown. METHODS: We evaluated associations of birth weight, body shape (or somatotype) at ages 5 and 10, BMI at age 18 and adulthood, weight change since age 18, waist circumference, waist to hip ratio, and height with creatinine-adjusted morning urinary melatonin (6-sulfatoxymelatonin, aMT6s) levels among 1,343 healthy women (aged 32-53 at urine collection, 1996-1999) in the Nurses' Health Study (NHS) II cohort. Using multivariable linear regression, we computed least-square mean aMT6s levels across categories of body size, and evaluated whether these associations were modified by night shift work. RESULTS: Adult BMI was inversely associated with aMT6s levels (mean aMT6s levels = 34 vs. 50 ng/mg creatinine, comparing adult BMI ≥ 30 vs. <20 kg/m(2); P trend < 0.0001); however, other measures of body size were not related to aMT6s levels after accounting for adult BMI. Night shifts worked prior to urine collection, whether recent or cumulatively over time, did not modify the association between adult BMI and aMT6s levels (e.g., P interaction = 0.72 for night shifts worked within two weeks of urine collection). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that adult BMI, but not earlier measures of body size, is associated with urinary aMT6s levels in adulthood. These observations did not vary by night shift work status, and suggest that adult BMI may be an important mechanism by which melatonin levels are altered and subsequently influence chronic disease risk.


Subject(s)
Body Size , Circadian Rhythm/physiology , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Melatonin/analogs & derivatives , Work Schedule Tolerance/physiology , Adult , Body Mass Index , Cohort Studies , Creatinine/urine , Female , Humans , Melatonin/urine , Middle Aged , Waist-Hip Ratio , Workload , Young Adult
20.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 12(11): 1879-86, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24780288

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Sleep deprivation is associated with production of inflammatory cytokines. Disturbed sleep quality has been associated with increased risk of disease flare in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC). However, the association between sleep and risk of incident CD and UC has not been previously examined. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of women who were enrolled in the Nurses' Health Study (NHS) I since 1976 and NHS II since 1989 and followed through detailed biennial questionnaires with >90% follow-up. We examined the association of sleep duration reported in 1986 in NHS I and 2001 in NHS II with incident CD and UC, diagnosed through 2010, in NHS I and 2009 in NHS II. Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for potential confounders were used to calculate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Among 151,871 women, we confirmed 191 cases of CD (incidence, 8/100,000 person-years) and 230 cases of UC (incidence, 10/100,000 person-years) over 2,292,849 person-years. Compared with women with reported usual sleep durations of 7-8 h/day (incidence, 8/100,000 person-years), women with reported sleep duration <6 h/day (11/100,000 person-years) or >9 h/day (20/100,000 person-years) had a higher incidence of UC (P < .05). The multivariate hazard ratios for UC were 1.51 (95% CI, 1.10-2.09) for sleep durations <6 h/day and 2.05 (95% CI, 1.44-2.92) for sleep durations >9 h/day, compared with sleep durations of 7-8 h/day. In contrast, sleep duration did not modify risk of CD. Duration of rotating night shift work was not associated with CD or UC. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of data from the NHS I and II, less than 6 hours sleep/day and more than 9 hours sleep/day are each associated with an increased risk of UC. Further studies are needed to evaluate sleep as a modifiable risk factor in the pathogenesis and progression of IBD.


Subject(s)
Colitis, Ulcerative/epidemiology , Sleep , Adult , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL