Development of Machine Learning Models for Predicting the 1-Year Risk of Reoperation After Lower Limb Oncological Resection and Endoprosthetic Reconstruction Based on Data From the PARITY Trial.

BACKGROUND: Oncological resection and reconstruction involving the lower extremities commonly lead to reoperations that impact patient outcomes and healthcare resources. This study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) model to predict this reoperation risk. METHODS: This study was conducted according to TRIPOD + AI. Data from the PARITY trial was used to develop ML models to predict the 1-year reoperation risk following lower extremity oncological resection and reconstruction. Six ML algorithms were tuned and calibrated based on fivefold cross-validation. The best-performing model was identified using classification and calibration metrics. RESULTS: The polynomial support vector machine (SVM) model was chosen as the best-performing model. During internal validation, the SVM exhibited an AUC-ROC of 0.73 and a Brier score of 0.17. Using an optimal threshold that balances all quadrants of the confusion matrix, the SVM exhibited a sensitivity of 0.45 and a specificity of 0.81. Using a high-sensitivity threshold, the SVM exhibited a sensitivity of 0.68 and a specificity of 0.68. Total operative time was the most important feature for reoperation risk prediction. CONCLUSION: The models may facilitate reoperation risk stratification, allowing for better patient counseling and for physicians to implement measures that reduce surgical risks.

Taper Junction Subsidence Occurs in Modular Tumor Endoprostheses: How Concerned Should We Be?

BACKGROUND: Advancements in musculoskeletal oncologic treatment have allowed for longer survival of patients with malignant bone tumors and the associated longer use of tumor endoprostheses in those who have had such reconstructions. Several studies have reported on increased serum metal ions with the use of such implants. Modularity in these implants introduces the risk of taper junction corrosion and subsidence resulting in metal wear particle release that may cause an adverse local tissue reaction or systemic toxicity. Additionally, these implants contain a large surface area of cobalt and chromium. It is unclear whether the source of the increased serum ion levels was due to the taper junction corrosion or the implant itself. To our knowledge, no prior study has reported on taper junction subsidence. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: In this study we sought (1) to determine survivorship free from radiographic taper junction subsidence in a femoral modular tumor endoprosthesis, and (2) to identify the implant characteristics in the endoprostheses associated with taper subsidence. METHODS: Between January 1996 and February 2020, the senior author performed 150 proximal or distal femur replacements following resections of soft tissue or bone tumors of the thigh and femur. Of those, 6% (9 of 150) of patients were lost to follow-up before 2 years, 25% (37 of 150) could not be analyzed due to absence of plain radiographs during follow-up, and 13% (20 of 150) died before 2 years follow-up, leaving 56% (84 of 150) for analysis in this retrospective study, with a median time for analysis of 14 years (range 2 to 31 years) after the index resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction for patients with distal femur replacements and 5 years (range 2 to 19 years) for patients with proximal femur replacement. Radiographs involving the entire implant were evaluated for the presence or absence of subsidence of the taper junction that was evident and clear to see if present. The association between the number of taper junctions, the length of resection, the number of collapsed junctions, and the time to collapse from the initial surgery were examined using regression analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 14% (12 of 84) patients with a distal femur replacement had radiographic collapse of at least one of the modular tapers. Survivorship free from taper subsidence was 91% (95% CI 86% to 96%) at 10 years and 84% (95% CI 78% to 90%) at 20 years. All patients were in the distal femur replacement group. The median follow-up of patients with subsidence was 15 years (range 5 to 26). Fifty-eight percent (7 of 12) of patients had two junctions involved, 25% (3 of 12) had three junctions, and 17% (2 of 12) had one junction involved. All but one patient had subsidence in a single junction. The median time to subsidence was 15 years (range 4.5 to 24.0 years). The subsidence was progressive in all patients who demonstrated it. The taper junction subsidence was complete in 75% (9 of 12) of patients and partial in 25% (3 of 12). Univariate and multivariable regression analyses did not show that the risk factors we studied were associated with subsidence. Two patients with junction subsidence were revised, one for taper fracture and one during busing exchange for distal junction subsidence. CONCLUSION: Taper damage with late and progressive subsidence of the intervening junction is not uncommon after distal femur replacement. The impact of such a complication is still unknown. Further studies should examine the long-term outcomes and correlate them with metal ion levels. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

A Case Report of Traumatic Partial Extensor Carpi Ulnaris Subluxation in an Elite Hockey Player With Review of the Literature.

In this article, we present a unique case of traumatic partial recurrent extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) subluxation in an elite hockey player. To the best of our knowledge, this is the only report of partial ECU subluxation due to a split in the ECU tendon presented in the literature. This case illustrates the importance of proper diagnosis and treatment of such a lesion. We also emphasize that dynamic ultrasound is an excellent and cost-effective imaging modality that can help with the diagnosis of partial ECU subluxation. Finally, surgical treatment for failed conservative management showed excellent results in an elite athlete.

Traumatic posterior shoulder dislocation with a large engaging Hill-Sachs lesion: splinting technique.

Posterior shoulder dislocations are rare and are often associated with seizures, electrocution, and high-energy trauma. They can be missed and, therefore, left untreated. Early diagnosis and treatment can help avoid future complications and surgical intervention.

Thirty-Day Complications of Conventional and Computer-Assisted Total Knee and Total Hip Arthroplasty: Analysis of 103,855 Patients in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.

BACKGROUND: Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) has gained popularity in orthopedics for both total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the past decades. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify patients who underwent a primary, unilateral THA and TKA from 2011 to 2013. Multivariate analysis was conducted to compare the postoperative complications in patients whose surgery involved the use of CAS with those by conventional techniques. RESULTS: We identified 103,855 patients who had THA and TKA in the database between 2011 and 2013. There were higher overall adverse events (odds ratio [OR], 1.40; CI, 1.22-1.59), minor events (OR, 1.38; CI, 1.21-1.58), and requirements for blood transfusion (OR, 1.44; CI, 1.25-1.67) in the conventional group when compared with CAS for TKA. However, rate of reoperation was higher in the CAS group for TKA (OR, 1.60; CI, 1.15-2.25). The results also showed higher overall adverse events (OR, 2.61; CI, 2.09-3.26), minor events (OR, 2.82; CI, 2.24-3.42), and requirements for blood transfusion (OR, 3.41; CI, 2.62-4.44) in the conventional group when compared to CAS for THA. Nevertheless, superficial wound infections (OR, 0.46; CI, 0.26-0.81) were shown to be higher in the CAS group undergoing THA. CONCLUSION: The use of CAS in THA and TKA reduced the number of minor adverse events in the first 30 days postoperatively. However, CAS was associated with an increased number of reoperations and superficial infections. The clinical benefits and disadvantages of CAS should be considered when determining the potential benefit-cost ratio of this technology.

Favorable Results of a Short, Tapered, Highly Porous, Proximally Coated Cementless Femoral Stem at a Minimum 4-Year Follow-Up.

BACKGROUND: Shorter femoral stems have been increasingly used in total hip arthroplasty. However, there are few clinical studies evaluating the outcomes of these stems and comparing them to their regular-sized counterparts. METHODS: Our study provides radiologic and functional outcomes at 5-year mean follow-up of 131 cementless Tri-Lock Bone Preservation Stems, a short tapered stem with a proximal porous coating. RESULTS: Stem-related complications were low with one revision for stem aseptic loosening. Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated 99.2% stem survival rate at 5 years, comparable to conventional length Tri-Lock stems (99.8% at 8.9 years). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the Tri-Lock Bone Preservation Stem can provide successful outcomes at 5-year follow-up. Further studies are required to determine the long-term outcome of these implants in patients with poor bone stock.

The use of computer-assisted surgery as an educational tool for the training of orthopedic surgery residents in pedicle screw placement: a pilot study and survey among orthopedic residents.

BACKGROUND: The training of orthopedic residents in adequate pedicle screw placement is very important. We sought to investigate orthopedic residents' perspectives on the use of computer-assisted surgery (CAS) in a training trial. METHODS: Orthopedic residents were randomly assigned to independently place a screw using the free-hand technique and the CAS technique on 1 of 3 cadavers (Cobb angles 5º, 15º and 67º) at randomly selected thoracolumbar vertebral levels. All residents were blinded to their colleagues' pedicle screw placements and were asked to complete a short questionnaire at the end of the session to evaluate their experience with CAS. We obtained CT images for each cadaver to assess pedicle screw placement accuracy and classified placement as A) screw completely in pedicle, B) screw < 2 mm outside pedicle, C) screw 2-4 mm outside pedicle, or D) screw > 4 mm outside pedicle. RESULTS: Twenty-four orthopedic residents participated in this trial study. In total, 65% preferred using the free-hand technique in an educational setting even though most (60%) said that CAS is safer. The main reason for free-hand technique preference was the difficult technical aspects encountered with CAS. In addition, accuracy of pedicle screw placement in this trial showed that 5 screws were classified as A or B (safe zone) and 19 as grade C or D (unsafe zone) using the free-hand technique compared with 15 and 9, respectively, using CAS (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Orthopedic residents perceived CAS as safe and demonstrated improved accuracy in pedicle screw placement in a single setting. However, the residents preferred the free-hand technique in an educational stetting owing to the difficult technical aspects of CAS.

CONTEXTE: Il est très important d'apprendre aux médecins résidents en chirurgie orthopédique comment positionner adéquatement une vis pédiculaire. Notre objectif était d'obtenir l'opinion des médecins résidents sur le recours à la chirurgie assistée par ordinateur (CAO) dans un essai sur la formation. MÉTHODES: Des médecins résidents en chirurgie orthopédique répartis aléatoirement ont placé indépendamment une vis à l'aide d'une technique à main libre basée sur les repères topographiques et la palpation, et de la CAO dans 1 de 3 cadavres (angles de Cobb de 5°, 15° et 67°) dans une vertèbre dorsolombaire sélectionnée aléatoirement. Aucun des médecins résidents n'a pu observer le positionnement de la vis de ses collègues, et les participants ont rempli un court questionnaire à la fin de la séance pour évaluer leur expérience de la CAO. Nous avons obtenu un tomodensitogramme pour chaque cadavre afin d'évaluer la précision du positionnement de la vis pédiculaire, classée selon 4 catégories : A) vis entièrement dans le pédicule, B) vis < 2 mm hors du pédicule, C) vis de 2­4 mm hors du pédicule, ou D) vis > 4 mm hors du pédicule. RÉSULTATS: Vingt-quatre médecins résidents en chirurgie orthopédique ont participé à l'étude clinique. Au total, 65 % d'entre eux ont préféré utiliser la technique à main libre dans un contexte de formation, même si la plupart (60 %) considéraient que la CAO était plus sécuritaire. La principale raison justifiant cette préférence était le degré de difficulté technique associé à la CAO. De plus, une évaluation de la précision du positionnement a montré qu'avec la technique à main libre, 5 des vis posées se classaient dans les catégories A ou B (sécuritaire) et 19 dans les catégories C ou D (non sécuritaire), alors que la CAO a permis de positionner 15 vis dans les catégories A ou B et 9 dans les catégories C ou D (p = 0,008). CONCLUSION: Chez un sous-groupe de patients souffrant de traumatismes abdominaux pénétrants, le traitement conservateur est sécuritaire et se traduit par une durée de séjour inférieure de 1,9 jour. La présence de fluide détectée par tomodensitographie est un indicateur de l'échec du traitement.

Methods to determine pedicle screw placement accuracy in spine surgery: a systematic review.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this systematic review were: (1) to determine the most commonly used methods for assessing pedicle screw placement accuracy, and (2) assess the difference in pedicle screw placement accuracy between navigation and free-hand techniques according to the classification method. BACKGROUND DATA: Pedicle screw fixation and spine surgery have almost become synonymous. However, there is currently no gold standard method to assess pedicle screw placement accuracy. We reviewed the literature to determine current techniques used by spine surgeons for the assessment of pedicle screw accuracy. METHODS: We systematically reviewed the medical literature (OVID Medline, Embase, PubMed) to identify all articles published between 2010 and 2013 that have assessed pedicle screw placement accuracy in humans. Two independent reviewers with a third independent mediator performed study screening, selection and data extraction using a blinded and objective protocol. RESULTS: A total of 68 relevant articles were included in this systematic review, for a total of 3442 patients, 60 cadavers and 43,305 pedicle screws. The most widely used method (37 articles) was based on 2 mm breach increments measured on computer tomography images. The second most widely used method consisted of an "in" or "out" classification system (16 articles). The remaining 15 articles used variable classification systems. Our result suggests that an average of 91.4% of pedicle screws placed with free-hand or fluoroscopy technique where within the safe zone (<2 mm breach) in comparison to an average of 97.3% of pedicle screws using navigation (p < 0.001) for the 2 mm increment method. Similarly, the in or out classification also showed statistically significant difference between free-hand and navigated techniques (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The grading system based on 2 mm increments seems to be the most widely accepted method for determining pedicle screw placement accuracy. All grading systems were based on imaging alone without taking into account the direction of the breach or patient's symptoms.

Midterm Outcomes of the Recently FDA Approved Ceramic on Ceramic Bearing in Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients Under 65 Years of Age.

The present study aimed to evaluate the mid-term results of the fourth generation of ceramic on ceramic (CC) bearing. Demographics, surgical technique, complications, clinical and radiologic outcomes were analyzed in a series of 133 consecutive CC total hip arthroplasties (THAs) with a newest generation CC bearings to determine if these provide safe and well performing bearings. At the last follow-up, there were no cases of ceramic fracture or chipping and no revision surgery necessary for bearing related complication. One hip underwent two staged revision for infection and another underwent revision for dislocation, resulting in an overall 98.5% survival rate at a mean of 6 years. The newest generation of CC bearings provides a reliable and safe bearing in young, active patients undergoing THA.

A comparison of the modified Tokuhashi and Tomita scores in determining prognosis for patients afflicted with spinal metastasis.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with spinal metastasis is not very promising and hard to predict. It is for this reason that scoring systems, such as the modified Tokuhashi and Tomita scores, have been created. We sought to determine the effectiveness of these scores in predicting patient survival. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of all patients treated for spinal metastasis between March 2003 and March 2012 in our centre. We computed the Tokuhashi and Tomita scores and compared them with documented patient survival. The 2 scores were also compared with one another. RESULTS: We identified 128 patients with spinal metastasis. The average survival of patients with predicted poor, average and good prognosis was 5, 17 and 25 months, respectively for the modified Tokuhashi score and 3, 16 and 19 months, respectively, for the Tomita score. Poor, average and good prognosis predictions differed significantly from one another for all 3 categories for the Tokuhashi score (all p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the moderate and good prognoses for the Tomita score (p = 0.15). When comparing both scores, we obtained a weighted κ of 0.4489 (standard deviation 0.0568, 95% confidence interval 0.3376-0.5602), demonstrating moderate agreement between scores. CONCLUSION: Both scores have merit for use in a clinical setting and can be used as tools to help determine treatment choice. The modified Tokuhashi score had better accuracy in determining actual survival.

CONTEXTE: Le pronostic des patients qui ont des métastases vertébrales est plutôt défavorable et difficile à prédire. C'est pour cette raison que des systèmes de classification tels que le score modifié de Tokuhashi et le score de Tomita ont été créés. Nous avons voulu déterminer l'efficacité de ces scores à prédire la survie chez les patients. MÉTHODES: Nous avons passé en revue de manière rétrospective les données concernant tous les patients traités pour métastases vertébrales entre mars 2003 et mars 2012 dans notre centre. Nous avons calculé les scores de Tokuhashi et de Tomita et nous les avons comparés à la survie documentée des patients. Les 2 scores ont aussi été comparés l'un à l'autre. RÉSULTATS: Nous avons recensé 128 patients atteints de métastases vertébrales. La survie moyenne des patients dont le pronostic prévu était défavorable, moyen ou favorable était de 5, 17 et 25 mois, respectivement, selon le score modifié de Tokuhashi et de 3, 16 et 19 mois, respectivement, selon le score de Tomita. Les prédictions pronostiques défavorables, moyennes et favorables ont différé significativement l'une de l'autre pour les 3 catégories du score de Tokuhashi (toutes p < 0,05). On n'a noté aucune différence significative pour ce qui est des pronostics moyens et favorables associés aux scores de Tomita (p = 0,15). Lorsque les 2 scores ont été comparés l'un à l'autre, nous avons obtenu une valeur κ de 0,4489 (écart-type 0,0568; intervalle de confiance de 95 %, 0,3376­0,5602), associée à une concordance modérée des scores. CONCLUSION: Les 2 scores sont utiles dans un contexte clinique et peuvent servir d'outils pour aider à faire le choix du traitement. Le score modifié de Tokuhashi a permis de déterminer la survie réelle avec plus de précision.

Inconsistencies between navigation data and radiographs in total knee arthroplasty are system-dependent and affect coronal alignment.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have compared the effect of different computer navigation systems on postoperative alignment in patients who have had total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We examined 2 computed tomography (CT)-free computer navigation systems by comparing the accuracy of intraoperative measurements to postoperative alignment. METHODS: Patients underwent unilateral TKA performed by a single surgeon using 1 of 2 CT-free navigation systems. We compared final intraoperative tibial and femoral coronal angles and mechanical axis with the same angles measured on standing postoperative radiographs. RESULTS: Groups of 31 and 50 patients underwent TKA with the 2 systems, respectively. We noted a significant difference in the coronal tibial implant angle (1.29º ± 1.35º) and in the mechanical axis (1.59º ± 2.36º) for one navigation system (both p < 0.001), while only the coronal tibial implant angle showed a significant difference (1.17º ± 1.65º, p < 0.001) for the second system. The number of radiographic outliers also significantly differed. A significantly higher proportion (32%; p < 0.01) of patients in the second cohort exhibited unacceptable malalignment compared with the first cohort (24%). CONCLUSION: Navigation systems for TKA continue to increase in sophistication and popularity. Owing to the significant difference in the proportion of alignment outliers in the 2 navigation systems tested in this study, orthopedic surgeons should not consider all TKA navigation systems equivalent. Additional investigations are needed to compare the accuracy of a variety of CT-free and CT-based navigation systems and to confirm our finding that accuracy is system-dependent.

CONTEXTE: Il existe peu d'études ayant comparé divers systèmes informatiques de navigation de guidage servant à vérifier l'alignement postopératoire de l'articulation chez des patients ayant subi une arthroplastie totale du genou (ATG). On a évalué 2 systèmes de navigation de guidage sans base tomodensitométrique en comparant l'exactitude des mesures d'alignement intra-opératoires et celles des mesures postopératoires. MÉTHODES: Des patients ont subi une ATG unilatérale, qui a été pratiquée par un seul chirurgien à l'aide de l'un des 2 systèmes de navigation de guidage sans base tomodensitométrique. On a comparé les mesures intra-opératoires finales de l'angle frontal de l'articulation tibiofémorale et de l'axe mécanique du genou aux angles mesurés sur les radiographies postopératoires en station debout. RÉSULTATS: Un groupe de 31 patients et un groupe de 50 ont subi une ATG réalisée à l'aide des 2 systèmes respectivement. On a observé un écart significatif des mesures de l'angle frontal de l'embase tibiale de la prothèse (1,29 º ± 1,35º) et des mesures de l'axe mécanique du genou (1,59 º± 2,36 º) avec l'un des systèmes de navigation (avec les deux, p < 0,001), tandis qu'avec l'autre, on a observé seulement une différence appréciable des mesures de l'angle frontal de l'embase tibiale (1,17 º± 1,65 º, p < 0,001). On a aussi observé une grande variation du nombre d'aberrations radiographiques. Dans la deuxième cohorte, on a observé une proportion significativement plus importante (32 %; p < 0,01) de patients présentant un défaut d'alignement inacceptable que dans la première (24 %). CONCLUSION: Les systèmes de navigation de guidage servant à réaliser les ATG ne cessent de se perfectionner et d'être de plus en plus prisés. Cependant, en raison de l'écart significatif de la proportion des défauts d'alignement dépistés entre les 2 systèmes de navigation testés au cours de cette étude, le chirurgien orthopédiste ne devrait pas croire que tous les systèmes sont équivalents. Il faudrait mener d'autres études pour comparer la précision de divers systèmes de navigation de guidage sans base tomodensitométrique à celle de systèmes à base tomodensitométrique pour corroborer notre constatation, c'està- dire que la précision dépend du système utilisé.

Comparative Outcomes and Failure Rates of Total Femur Replacement in Oncologic and Nononcologic Indications: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Total femur replacement (TFR) has become increasingly significant as a salvage procedure for both oncologic reconstruction and complex nononcologic conditions such as revision arthroplasty. Despite its effectiveness in limb salvage, TFR is associated with high complication and failure rates, which vary depending on the underlying indication. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases was conducted, focusing on studies that reported outcomes of TFR in oncologic and nononcologic cases. Primary outcomes included failure mode and rates according to the Henderson classification, functional outcomes scores, and mobility status. Data were analyzed using random-effects models and generalized linear mixed models. RESULTS: A total of 35 studies involving 1,002 patients were included. The majority of TFRs were performed for oncologic reasons (63.7%). The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score was 66%, with a limb salvage rate of 89%. The meta-analysis revealed a combined failure rate of 34%. For type 4 failures (infection), nononcologic patients exhibited a significantly higher rate at 18% (95% confidence interval [CI], 12%-26%, I2 = 46%, p < 0.01) compared with 8% in oncologic patients (95% CI, 6%-12%, I2 = 0%). Regarding combined types 1 to 4 failures, oncologic patients had a rate of 20% (95% CI, 25%-52%, I2 = 60%), whereas nononcologic patients faced a higher rate of 37% (95% CI, 12%-26%, I2 = 63%) (p < 0.05), indicating a significant difference. There were no significant differences in the MSTS score. In addition, there were no notable differences when comparing failure modes 1, 2, and 3 independently. Mobility analysis showed that approximately 70% of patients required walking aids after surgery. CONCLUSION: TFR offers a valuable limb salvage option in both oncologic and nononcologic scenarios, despite its high failure rates. Although functional outcomes were similar between groups, the higher failure rate in nononcologic cases and the poor overall quality of evidence warrant further comprehensive assessments into predictors of outcomes to optimize results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The Impact of Adjunct Medical Therapy on Survival after Spine Metastasis: A Systematic Review and Pooled Data Analysis.

Targeted therapy has greatly improved the outlook for patients with spinal metastatic cancers. Scoring systems like the Tokuhashi or Tomita scores are commonly used to predict prognosis and inform surgical decisions, but they are outdated and fail to consider recent advancements. We aimed to investigate the current state of the literature and treatment options pertaining to advancements in targeted therapy compared to other forms of medical management for metastatic spinal tumors. This study represents the first comprehensive systematic review that encompasses the most common primary cancers that metastasize to the spine and evaluates the median overall survival (mOS) across five different medical treatment modalities as well as surgical intervention. Additionally, our study analyzes the tumor receptor status in conjunction with these treatments. A PubMed search was conducted, and according to the PRISMA guidelines, 28 articles out of 1834 met the inclusion criteria. The pooled data analysis highlighted the superior efficacy of targeted therapy, evidenced by a significant improvement in the mOS and lower hazard ratios in patients with lung and breast cancers who received targeted therapy compared to those who did not. Our study provides valuable insights into the recent advancements in the medical management of metastatic spinal tumors. Future indications include incorporating this literature into personalized treatment approaches for metastatic spinal tumors.

Bone Allograft Pedicle Screw Augmentation: A Biomechanical Study.

STUDY DESIGN: We performed a comprehensive cadaveric biomechanical study to compare the fixation strength of primary screws, screws augmented with bone allograft, and screws augmented with polymethylmethacrylate cement. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a novel technique for screw augmentation using morselized cortico-cancellous bone allograft to fill the widened screw track of failed pedicle screws. BACKGROUND: To date, there are no known biological methods available for failed pedicle screw augmentation or fixation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Biomechanical tests were performed using 2 different testing modalities to quantify fixation strength including axial screw pullout and progressive cyclic displacement tests. RESULTS: Fifty vertebrae were instrumented with pedicle screws. Our study showed that bone allograft augmentation using the same diameter screw was noninferior to the fixation strength of the initial screw. In the axial pullout test, screws undergoing bone allograft repair failed at 25% lower loads compared with native screws, and screws augmented with cement showed approximately twice as much strength compared with native screws. In the cyclic displacement test, screws fixed with cement resisted loosening the best of all the groups tested. However, screws augmented with bone graft were found to have an equal strength to native screw purchase. our study did not find a correlation with bone mineral density as a predictor for failure in axial pullout or cyclic displacement tests. CONCLUSION: Bone allograft augmentation for pedicle screw fixation was noninferior to the initial screw purchase in this biomechanical study. This bone allograft technique is a viable option for screw fixation in the revision setting when there is significant bone loss in the screw track.

Does Spinal Cord Type Predict Intraoperative Neuro-Monitoring Alerts in Scoliosis Correction Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Operative and Radiologic Predictors.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVES: Predicting patient risk of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) alerts preoperatively can aid patient counselling and surgical planning. Sielatycki et al established an axial-MRI-based spinal cord classification system to predict risk of IONM alerts in scoliosis correction surgery. We aim to systematically review the literature on operative and radiologic factors associated with IONM alerts, including a novel spinal cord classification. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) Guidelines. A literature search identifying all observational studies comparing patients with and without IONM alerts was conducted. Suitable studies were included. Patient demographics, radiological measures and operative factors were collected. RESULTS: 11 studies were included including 3040 patients. Relative to type 3 cords, type 1 (OR = .03, CI = .01-.08, P < .00001), type 2 (OR = .08, CI = .03, P <.00001) and all non-type 3 cords (OR = .05, CI = .02-.16, P < .00001) were associated with significantly lower odds of IONM alerts. Significant radiographic measures for IONM alerts included coronal Cobb angle (MD = 10.66, CI = 5.77-15.56, P < .00001), sagittal Cobb angle (MD = 9.27, CI = 3.28-14.73, P = .0009), sagittal deformity angle ratio (SDAR) (MD = 2.76, CI = 1.57-3.96, P < .00001) and total deformity angle ratio (TDAR) (MD = 3.44, CI = 2.27-4.462, P < .00001). Clinically, estimated blood loss (MD = 274.13, CI = -240.03-788.28, P = .30), operation duration (MD = 50.79, CI = 20.58-81.00, P = .0010), number of levels fused (MD = .92, CI = .43-1.41, P = .0002) and number of vertebral levels resected (MD = .43, CI = .01-.84, P = .05) were significantly greater in IONM alert patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the relationship of operative and radiologic factors with IONM alerts.

A multimodal neural network with gradient blending improves predictions of survival and metastasis in sarcoma.

The objective of this study is to develop a multimodal neural network (MMNN) model that analyzes clinical variables and MRI images of a soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patient, to predict overall survival and risk of distant metastases. We compare the performance of this MMNN to models based on clinical variables alone, radiomics models, and an unimodal neural network. We include patients aged 18 or older with biopsy-proven STS who underwent primary resection between January 1st, 2005, and December 31st, 2020 with complete outcome data and a pre-treatment MRI with both a T1 post-contrast sequence and a T2 fat-sat sequence available. A total of 9380 MRI slices containing sarcomas from 287 patients are available. Our MMNN accepts the entire 3D sarcoma volume from T1 and T2 MRIs and clinical variables. Gradient blending allows the clinical and image sub-networks to optimally converge without overfitting. Heat maps were generated to visualize the salient image features. Our MMNN outperformed all other models in predicting overall survival and the risk of distant metastases. The C-Index of our MMNN for overall survival is 0.77 and the C-Index for risk of distant metastases is 0.70. The provided heat maps demonstrate areas of sarcomas deemed most salient for predictions. Our multimodal neural network with gradient blending improves predictions of overall survival and risk of distant metastases in patients with soft tissue sarcoma. Future work enabling accurate subtype-specific predictions will likely utilize similar end-to-end multimodal neural network architecture and require prospective curation of high-quality data, the inclusion of genomic data, and the involvement of multiple centers through federated learning.

Controversies in orthopaedic oncology.

Chondrosarcoma is the second most common surgically treated primary bone sarcoma. Despite a large number of scientific papers in the literature, there is still significant controversy about diagnostics, treatment of the primary tumour, subtypes, and complications. Therefore, consensus on its day-to-day treatment decisions is needed. In January 2024, the Birmingham Orthopaedic Oncology Meeting (BOOM) attempted to gain global consensus from 300 delegates from over 50 countries. The meeting focused on these critical areas and aimed to generate consensus statements based on evidence amalgamation and expert opinion from diverse geographical regions. In parallel, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in oncological reconstructions poses unique challenges due to factors such as adjuvant treatments, large exposures, and the complexity of surgery. The meeting debated two-stage revisions, antibiotic prophylaxis, managing acute PJI in patients undergoing chemotherapy, and defining the best strategies for wound management and allograft reconstruction. The objectives of the meeting extended beyond resolving immediate controversies. It sought to foster global collaboration among specialists attending the meeting, and to encourage future research projects to address unsolved dilemmas. By highlighting areas of disagreement and promoting collaborative research endeavours, this initiative aims to enhance treatment standards and potentially improve outcomes for patients globally. This paper sets out some of the controversies and questions that were debated in the meeting.

Outcomes After Abductor Reattachment to Proximal Femur Endoprosthesis After Tumor Resection.

INTRODUCTION: Resection of the proximal femur raises several challenges including restoration of the abductor mechanism. Few evaluated the outcomes of different techniques of abductor fixation to the proximal femur endoprosthesis. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent proximal femoral arthroplasty with a minimum follow-up of 12 months was conducted. Patients were divided into two groups: (1) those with preserved greater trochanter (GT) reattached to the implant and (2) those with direct abductor muscle reattachment. Both groups were compared for surgical and functional outcomes. Group 1 patients were subdivided into those who received GT reinsertion using grip and cables and those reattached using sutures. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were included with a mean follow-up of 49 months. There were 22 patients with reinserted GT and 31 patients with soft-tissue repair. The endoprosthesis revision rate was comparable between groups (P = 0.27); however, the incidence of dislocations was higher in group 2 (0/22 versus 6/31; P = 0.035). Trendelenburg gait (77% versus 74%), use of walking aids (68% versus 81%), and abductor muscle strength were comparable between both groups (P > 0.05). In group 1, 15 patients had GT reinsertion with grip and cables. Of those, five patients (33%) had cable rupture within 13 months of follow-up. GT displacement reached 12 mm at 12 months of follow-up in patients with grip and cables compared with 26 mm in patients with GT suture reinsertion (P < 0.05). DISCUSSION: Although GT preservation did not improve functional outcomes, it was associated with a lower dislocation rate despite frequent cable failure. Less displacement was observed when GT reattachment used grip and cables.

Surgical Management of the Metastatic Spine Disease: A Review of the Literature and Proposed Algorithm.

STUDY DESIGN: Narrative Review. The spine remains the most common site for bony metastasis. It is estimated that up to 70% of cancer patients harbor secondary spinal disease. And up to 10% will develop a clinically significant lesion. The last two decades have seen a substantial leap forward in the advancements of the management of spinal metastases. What once was a death sentence is now a manageable, even potentially treatable condition. With marked advancements in the surgical treatment and post-operative radiotherapy, a standardized approach to stratify and manage these patients is both prudent and now feasible. OBJECTIVES: This article looks to examine the best available evidence in the stratification and surgical management of patients with spinal metastases. So the aim of this review is to offer a standardized approach for surgical management and surgical planning of patients with spinal metastases.

Primary Sarcomas of the Spine: A Systematic Review and Pooled Data Analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review of the literature and pooled data analysis of treatment outcomes of primary sarcomas of the spine. OBJECTIVE: To examine the current literature and treatment options for primary sarcomas of the spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A paucity of literature exists on treatment outcomes of primary sarcomas of the spine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two authors searched PubMed to identify articles for review, and a pooled data analysis was performed to determine overall survival for each type of surgical resection on spine sarcomas. RESULTS: In total, 1776 articles were identified, and 11 met our inclusion criteria for review. In chondrosarcoma, overall survival was significantly higher with en bloc excision when compared with piecemeal resection (HR for piecemeal resection: 4.11; 95% CI: 2.08-8.15). Subgroup analysis showed that the addition of radiation therapy after piecemeal excision increased overall survival to 60 months from 48 months with piecemeal excision alone. In osteosarcoma, there was no significant difference in overall survival between en bloc and piecemeal resection (HR for piecemeal resection: 1.76; 95% CI: 0.776-3.99). In Ewing's sarcoma, overall survival was significantly higher when a successful en bloc resection was achieved and coupled with chemotherapy and radiation therapy for local control (HR for piecemeal resection: 7.96; 95% CI: 2.12-20.1). Interestingly, when a successful en bloc resection could not be achieved, chemotherapy and radiation therapy alone had significantly higher survival than piecemeal resection (HR for piecemeal resection: 2.63; 95% CI: 1.01-6.84). A significantly higher number of local recurrences were associated with the piecemeal resection group in all types of spine sarcomas. CONCLUSION: This review and pooled data seem to favor en bloc excision for local control as the treatment of choice in primary sarcomas of the spine.