Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 63
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Can J Anaesth ; 69(10): 1240-1247, 2022 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35997856

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To test a new approach to address moral distress in intensive care unit (ICU) personnel. METHODS: Using principles of participatory action research, we developed an eight-step moral conflict assessment (MCA) that guides participants in describing the behaviour that they have to implement, the effects this has on them, their current coping strategies, their values in conflict, any other concerns related to the situation, what helps and hinders the situation, new coping strategies, and the effect of the preceding steps on participants. This assessment was tested with eight ICU providers in an 11-bed community ICU. RESULTS: During three one-hour sessions, participants described their moral distress that was caused by the use of ongoing life-support for a patient who the team believed did not prefer this course of care, but whose family was requesting it. Participants experienced frustration and discouragement and coping strategies included speaking to colleagues and exercising. They felt that they were unable to take meaningful action to resolve this conflict. Values that were in conflict in the situation included beneficence and patient autonomy. Based on ranking of helping and hindering factors, the team proposed new strategies including improving consistency of care plans and educating patients' family members and ICU personnel about advance care planning and end-of-life care. After completing this assessment, participants reported less stress and a greater ability to take meaningful action, including some of the proposed new strategies. CONCLUSIONS: We found this new approach to address moral distress in ICU personnel to be feasible and a useful tool for facilitating plans for reducing moral distress.


RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Nous avons souhaité mettre à l'essai une nouvelle approche pour traiter la détresse morale du personnel des unités de soins intensifs (USI). MéTHODE: En nous fondant sur les principes de la recherche-action participative, nous avons développé une évaluation des conflits moraux (ECM) en huit étapes qui guide les participants dans la description du comportement qu'ils doivent mettre en œuvre, des effets que cela a sur eux, de leurs stratégies d'adaptation actuelles, de leurs valeurs en conflit, de toute autre préoccupation liée à la situation, de ce qui aide et entrave la situation, de nouvelles stratégies d'adaptation, et de l'effet des étapes précédentes sur les participants. Cette évaluation a été testée auprès de huit praticiens de soins intensifs dans une unité de soins intensifs communautaire de 11 lits. RéSULTATS: Au cours de trois séances d'une heure, les participants ont décrit leur détresse morale causée par l'utilisation d'un système de réanimation continu pour un patient qui, selon l'équipe, ne préférait pas ce traitement, mais qui était demandé par la famille. Les participants ont éprouvé de la frustration et du découragement et les stratégies d'adaptation comprenaient le fait d'en parler à des collègues et de faire de l'exercice. Ils se sont sentis incapables de poser des gestes significatifs pour résoudre ce conflit. Les valeurs qui étaient en conflit dans la situation comprenaient la bienfaisance et l'autonomie du patient. Sur la base du classement des facteurs d'aide et d'entrave, l'équipe a proposé de nouvelles stratégies, notamment l'amélioration de l'uniformité des plans de soins et l'éducation des membres de la famille des patients et du personnel des soins intensifs sur la planification de soins avancés et les soins de fin de vie. Après avoir terminé cette évaluation, les participants ont déclaré éprouver moins de stress et une plus grande capacité à poser des gestes significatifs, y compris certaines des nouvelles stratégies proposées. CONCLUSION: Nous avons constaté que cette nouvelle approche visant à traiter la détresse morale chez le personnel des soins intensifs était faisable et qu'elle constituait un outil utile pour faciliter les plans de réduction de la détresse morale.


Asunto(s)
Estrés Psicológico , Cuidado Terminal , Adaptación Psicológica , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Principios Morales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
Crit Care Med ; 48(7): 946-953, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32317594

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To examine adverse events and associated factors and outcomes during transition from ICU to hospital ward (after ICU discharge). DESIGN: Multicenter cohort study. SETTING: Ten adult medical-surgical Canadian ICUs. PATIENTS: Patients were those admitted to one of the 10 ICUs from July 2014 to January 2016. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Two ICU physicians independently reviewed progress and consultation notes documented in the medical record within 7 days of patient's ICU discharge date to identify and classify adverse events. The adverse event data were linked to patient characteristics and ICU and ward physician surveys collected during the larger prospective cohort study. Analyses were conducted using multivariable logistic regression. Of the 451 patients included in the study, 84 (19%) experienced an adverse event, the majority (62%) within 3 days of transfer from ICU to hospital ward. Most adverse events resulted only in symptoms (77%) and 36% were judged to be preventable. Patients with adverse events were more likely to be readmitted to the ICU (odds ratio, 5.5; 95% CI, 2.4-13.0), have a longer hospital stay (mean difference, 16.1 d; 95% CI, 8.4-23.7) or die in hospital (odds ratio, 4.6; 95% CI, 1.8-11.8) than those without an adverse event. ICU and ward physician predictions at the time of ICU discharge had low sensitivity and specificity for predicting adverse events, ICU readmissions, and hospital death. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse events are common after ICU discharge to hospital ward and are associated with ICU readmission, increased hospital length of stay and death and are not predicted by ICU or ward physicians.


Asunto(s)
Errores Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Transferencia de Pacientes , Adulto , Canadá/epidemiología , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Transferencia de Pacientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
3.
J Intensive Care Med ; 35(1): 63-67, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28901208

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine whether invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) due to serotype 5, which occurred as a local outbreak in 2006 to 2007, is associated with intensive care unit (ICU) admission, hospital mortality, or organ supports in those who are critically ill. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of patients who presented with IPD to 2 tertiary hospitals in Vancouver, Canada, from July 2004 to June 2007. We compared patient characteristics, interventions, and outcomes between patients who had serotype 5 and other serotypes using bivariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: A total of 149 patients had serotype 5 and 106 had nonserotype 5. Patients with serotype 5 were younger, had lower prevalence of comorbid diseases, and had higher rates of substance use than patients with nonserotype 5. There were no differences in chest tube placement for complications of pneumonia or in ICU admission. Frequency of necrotizing pneumonia and hospital mortality were lower in the serotype 5 group. For the 71 patients with IPD who were admitted to ICU, there was no difference in severity of illness, ICU length of stay, or ICU mortality between the groups. There was also no difference in organ supports except that the serotype 5 group was more likely to receive vasopressors. CONCLUSION: Serotype 5 in patients who have IPD is associated with no difference in ICU admission but with increased use of vasopressors and lower hospital mortality.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Neumocócicas/microbiología , Streptococcus pneumoniae/clasificación , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Enfermedad Crítica , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones Neumocócicas/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Serogrupo
4.
CMAJ ; 190(22): E669-E676, 2018 06 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29866892

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Transfer of patient care from an intensive care unit (ICU) to a hospital ward is often challenging, high risk and inefficient. We assessed patient and provider perspectives on barriers and facilitators to high-quality transfers and recommendations to improve the transfer process. METHODS: We conducted semistructured interviews of participants from a multicentre prospective cohort study of ICU transfers conducted at 10 hospitals across Canada. We purposively sampled 1 patient, 1 family member of a patient, 1 ICU provider, and 1 ward provider at each of the 8 English-speaking sites. Qualitative content analysis was used to derive themes, subthemes and recommendations. RESULTS: The 35 participants described 3 interrelated, overarching themes perceived as barriers or facilitators to high-quality patient transfers: resource availability, communication and institutional culture. Common recommendations suggested to improve ICU transfers included implementing standardized communication tools that streamline provider-provider and provider-patient communication, using multimodal communication to facilitate timely, accurate, durable and mutually reinforcing information transfer; and developing procedures to manage delays in transfer to ensure continuity of care for patients in the ICU waiting for a hospital ward bed. INTERPRETATION: Patient and provider perspectives attribute breakdown of ICU-to-ward transfers of care to resource availability, communication and institutional culture. Patients and providers recommend standardized, multimodal communication and transfer procedures to improve quality of care.


Asunto(s)
Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Transferencia de Pacientes , Canadá , Comunicación , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/normas , Familia/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Transferencia de Pacientes/organización & administración , Transferencia de Pacientes/normas , Evaluación de Procesos, Atención de Salud , Relaciones Profesional-Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Investigación Cualitativa
5.
Crit Care ; 22(1): 19, 2018 01 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29374498

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Little is known about documentation during transitions of patient care between clinical specialties. Therefore, we examined the focus, structure and purpose of physician progress notes for patients transferred from the intensive care unit (ICU) to hospital ward to identify opportunities to improve communication breaks. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study in ten Canadian hospitals. We analyzed physician progress notes for consenting adult patients transferred from a medical-surgical ICU to hospital ward. The number, length, legibility and content of notes was counted and compared across care settings using mixed-effects linear regression models accounting for clustering within hospitals. Qualitative content analyses were conducted on a stratified random sample of 32 patients. RESULTS: A total of 447 patient medical records that included 7052 progress notes (mean 2.1 notes/patient/day 95% CI 1.9-2.3) were analyzed. Notes written by the ICU team were significantly longer than notes written by the ward team (mean lines of text 21 vs. 15, p < 0.001). There was a discrepancy between documentation of patient issues in the last ICU and first ward notes; mean agreement of patient issues was 42% [95% CI 31-53%]. Qualitative analyses identified eight themes related to focus (central point - e.g., problem list), structure (organization, - e.g., note-taking style), and purpose (intention - e.g., documentation of patient course) of the notes that varied across clinical specialties and physician seniority. CONCLUSIONS: Important gaps and variations in written documentation during transitions of patient care between ICU and hospital ward physicians are common, and include discrepancies in documentation of patient information.


Asunto(s)
Transferencia de Pacientes , Médicos/psicología , Informe de Investigación/normas , Canadá , Estudios de Cohortes , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/normas , Documentación/métodos , Documentación/normas , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Registros Médicos , Transferencia de Pacientes/métodos , Habitaciones de Pacientes/organización & administración , Médicos/normas , Estudios Prospectivos , Investigación Cualitativa , Recursos Humanos
6.
Can J Anaesth ; 64(3): 260-269, 2017 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28028673

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Very elderly (over 80 yr of age) critically ill patients admitted to medical-surgical intensive care units (ICUs) have a high incidence of mortality, prolonged hospital length of stay, and dependent living conditions should they survive. The primary purpose of this study is to describe the outcomes and differences in outcomes between very elderly medical patients and their surgical counterparts admitted to Canadian ICUs, thereby informing decision-making for clinicians and substitute decision-makers. METHODS: This was a prospective multicentre cohort study of very elderly medical and surgical patients admitted to 22 Canadian academic and non-academic ICUs. Outcome measures included ICU length of stay and mortality, hospital length of stay and mortality, and disposition following hospital discharge. RESULTS: There were 1,671 patients evaluated in this study. Patient demographics included a mean age of 84.5 yr, baseline Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score of 22.4, baseline Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score of 5.3, overall ICU mortality of 21.8%, and overall hospital mortality of 35.0%. Medical patient median ICU length of stay was 4.1 days, hospital length of stay was 16.2 days, ICU mortality was 26.5%, and hospital mortality was 41.5%. Surgical patient median ICU length of stay was 3.8 days, hospital length of stay was 20.1 days, ICU mortality was 18.7%, and hospital mortality was 31.6%. Only 45.0% of medical patients and 41.6% of surgical emergency patients were able to return home to live. CONCLUSIONS: In this large sample of critically ill medical and surgical patients, the admission SOFA score and hospital lengths of stay were not different between the two groups, but medical patients had longer ICU lengths of stay and higher ICU and hospital mortality than surgical patients.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Tiempo de Internación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Puntuaciones en la Disfunción de Órganos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Estudios Prospectivos
7.
Can J Anaesth ; 63(6): 718-24, 2016 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26911559

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) using histamine-2-receptor antagonists has been a standard of care in intensive care units (ICUs) for four decades. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are increasingly used despite apparently lower background rates of gastrointestinal bleeding and growing concerns about PPI-associated complications. Our objective was to understand the views and prescribing habits amongst Canadian physicians regarding SUP in the ICU and to gauge interest in a future randomized-controlled trial (RCT). METHODS: We created a short self-administered survey about SUP for critically ill adults, evaluated its clinical sensibility, and pilot tested the instrument. We surveyed all physician members of the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group (CCCTG) by e-mail and sent reminders three and five weeks later. RESULTS: We received 94 of 111 (85%) surveys from the validated respondent pool between May and June, 2015. Respondents reported use of SUP most commonly in patients 1) receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (62, 66%), 2) expected to be ventilated for ≥ two days (25, 27%), or 3) receiving mechanical ventilation but nil per os (NPO) (20, 21%). Stress ulcer prophylaxis is discontinued when patients no longer receive mechanical ventilation (75%), no longer are NPO (22%), or are discharged from the ICU (19%). Stress ulcer prophylaxis involves PPIs in 68% of centres. Most respondents endorsed the need for a large rigorous RCT of PPI vs placebo to understand the risks and benefits of this practice. CONCLUSIONS: Stress ulcer prophylaxis is reportedly used primarily for the duration of mechanical ventilation. The CCCTG physicians believe that a placebo-controlled RCT is needed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of contemporary SUP with PPIs.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Antagonistas de los Receptores H2 de la Histamina/uso terapéutico , Úlcera Péptica/prevención & control , Respiración Artificial/efectos adversos , Estrés Fisiológico/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto , Canadá , Enfermedad Crítica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Úlcera Péptica/etiología , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Úlcera
8.
J Intensive Care Med ; 30(7): 413-9, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24509494

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To illustrate the complexities of assessing the influence of individual organizational factors on outcomes for intensive care unit (ICU) patients in Canada. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we used retrospectively collected data from all patients admitted to all ICUs in British Columbia between April 01, 1994, and March 31, 1999, or to 20 ICUs in Ontario during 2002. We used responses to a survey about organizational factors for all ICUs in British Columbia and Ontario that was done in 2001. Clustered data regression models were used to assess the influence of organizational factors on outcomes after adjustment for patient-level confounders. RESULTS: Despite adjustment for age, sex, comorbidity score of patients, and limitation of the data sets to minimize confounding, we found variable relationships between ICU outcomes (hospital mortality, ICU length of stay, and hospital length of stay) and any of "closed" administrative model, daily rounds, presence of an ICU medical director, medical director trained in critical care medicine, presence of a nurse leader in the ICU, nurse-patient ratio, and presence of an ICU pharmacist. Closed administrative model was associated with lower hospital mortality (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.75 [0.66-0.85]), shorter length of ICU stay (rate ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.76 [0.62-0.92]), and shorter length of hospital stay (rate ratio [5% confidence interval]: 0.78 [0.72-0.84]) in nontertiary ICUs but many other "advantageous" factors were associated with higher mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of a consistent relationship between organizational factors and ICU outcomes, and relationships that show increased mortality associated with some advantageous factors, suggests that there is residual confounding in these relationships. Models that adjust for only conventional patient-level confounders are unlikely to provide valid estimates of the influence of organizational factors.


Asunto(s)
Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/normas , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Canadá , Factores de Confusión Epidemiológicos , Estudios Transversales , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Estudios Retrospectivos
9.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 189(10): 1204-13, 2014 May 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24635548

RESUMEN

RATIONALE: Mortality caused by septic shock may be determined by a systemic inflammatory response, independent of the inciting infection, but it may also be influenced by the anatomic source of infection. OBJECTIVES: To determine the association between the anatomic source of infection and hospital mortality in critically ill patients who have septic shock. METHODS: This was a retrospective, multicenter cohort study of 7,974 patients who had septic shock in 29 academic and community intensive care units in Canada, the United States, and Saudi Arabia from January 1989 to May 2008. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Subjects were assigned 1 of 20 anatomic sources of infection based on clinical diagnosis and/or isolation of pathogens. The primary outcome was hospital mortality. Overall crude hospital mortality was 52% (21-85% across sources of infection). Variation in mortality remained after adjusting for year of admission, geographic source of admission, age, sex, comorbidities, community- versus hospital-acquired infection, and organism type. The source of infection with the highest standardized hospital mortality was ischemic bowel (75%); the lowest was obstructive uropathy-associated urinary tract infection (26%). Residual variation in adjusted hospital mortality was not explained by Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, number of Day 1 organ failures, bacteremia, appropriateness of empiric antimicrobials, or adjunct therapies. In patients who received appropriate antimicrobials after onset of hypotension, source of infection was associated with death after adjustment for both predisposing and downstream factors. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomic source of infection should be considered in future trial designs and analyses, and in development of prognostic scoring systems.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Choque Séptico/mortalidad , Anciano , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Canadá/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Enfermedad Crítica/mortalidad , Infección Hospitalaria/diagnóstico , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Arabia Saudita/epidemiología , Choque Séptico/diagnóstico , Choque Séptico/tratamiento farmacológico , Choque Séptico/microbiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
11.
Crit Care Med ; 41(1): 15-23, 2013 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23222254

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Ventilator-associated pneumonia is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia may improve outcomes, but optimal methods to ensure implementation of guidelines in the intensive care unit are unclear. Hence, we determined the effect of educational sessions augmented with reminders, and led by local opinion leaders, as strategies to implement evidence-based ventilator-associated pneumonia guidelines on guideline concordance and ventilator-associated pneumonia rates. DESIGN: Two-year prospective, multicenter, time-series study conducted between June 2007 and December 2009. SETTING: Eleven ICUs (ten in Canada, one in the United States); five academic and six community ICUs. PATIENTS: At each site, 30 adult patients mechanically ventilated >48 hrs were enrolled during four data collection periods (baseline, 6, 15, and 24 months). INTERVENTION: Guideline recommendations for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia were implemented using a multifaceted intervention (education, reminders, local opinion leaders, and implementation teams) directed toward the entire multidisciplinary ICU team. Clinician exposure to the intervention was assessed at 6, 15, and 24 months after the introduction of this intervention. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The main outcome measure was aggregate concordance with the 14 ventilator-associated pneumonia guideline recommendations. One thousand three hundred twenty patients were enrolled (330 in each study period). Clinician exposure to the multifaceted intervention was high and increased during the study: 86.7%, 93.3%, 95.8%, (p < .001), as did aggregate concordance (mean [SD]): 50.7% (6.1), 54.4% (7.1), 56.2% (5.9), 58.7% (6.7) (p = .007). Over the study period, ventilator-associated pneumonia rates decreased (events/330 patients): 47 (14.2%), 34 (10.3%), 38 (11.5%), 29 (8.8%) (p = .03). CONCLUSIONS: A 2-yr multifaceted intervention to enhance ventilator-associated pneumonia guideline uptake was associated with a significant increase in guideline concordance and a reduction in ventilator-associated pneumonia rates.


Asunto(s)
Adhesión a Directriz , Capacitación en Servicio , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/prevención & control , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Canadá , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/diagnóstico , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/terapia , Estudios Prospectivos , Investigación Biomédica Traslacional , Estados Unidos
12.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 14(8): e350-6, 2013 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23863815

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit 24 (FS-ICU 24) survey consists of two domains (overall care and medical decision-making) and was validated only for family members of adult patients in the ICU. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the internal consistency and construct validity of the FS-ICU 24 survey modified for parents/caregivers of pediatric patients (Pediatric Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit 24 [pFS-ICU 24]) by comparing it to McPherson's PICU satisfaction survey, in a similar racial/ethnic population as the original Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit validation studies (English-speaking Caucasian adults). We hypothesized that the pFS-ICU 24 would be psychometrically sound to assess satisfaction of parents/caregivers with critically ill children. DESIGN: A prospective survey examination of the pFS-ICU 24 was performed (1/2011-12/2011). Participants completed the pFS-ICU 24 and McPherson's survey with the order of administration alternated with each consecutive participant to control for order effects (nonrandomized). Cronbach's alphas (α) were calculated to examine internal consistency reliability, and Pearson correlations were calculated to examine construct validity. SETTING: University-affiliated, children's hospital, cardiothoracic ICU. SUBJECTS: English-speaking Caucasian parents/caregivers of children less than 18 years old admitted to the ICU (on hospital day 3 or 4) were approached to participate if they were at the bedside for greater than or equal to 2 days. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Fifty parents/caregivers completed the surveys (mean age ± SD = 36.2±9.6 yr; 56% mothers). The α for the pFS-ICU 24 was 0.95 and 0.92 for McPherson's survey. Overall, responses for the pFS-ICU 24 and McPherson's survey were significantly correlated (r = 0.73; p < 0.01). The average overall pFS-ICU 24 satisfaction score was 92.6 ± 8.3. The average pFS-ICU 24 satisfaction with care domain and medical decision-making domain scores were 93.3 ± 8.8 and 91.2 ± 8.9, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The pFS-ICU 24 is a psychometrically sound measure of satisfaction with care and medical decision-making of parents/caregivers with children in the ICU.


Asunto(s)
Cuidadores/psicología , Enfermedad Crítica , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico , Padres/psicología , Satisfacción Personal , Adulto , Niño , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Psicometría , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
13.
Chest ; 163(5): 1101-1108, 2023 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36574927

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Health care professionals experience moral distress when they cannot act based on their moral beliefs because of perceived constraints. Moral distress prevalence is high among critical care (ICU) clinicians, but varies significantly between and within professions. RESEARCH QUESTION: How can the interindividual variability in moral distress of Canadian ICU physicians be explained to inform future system-based interventions? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We analyzed 135 free-text comments written by 83 of the 225 ICU physicians who participated in an online cross-sectional wellness survey. An interdisciplinary team of five investigators completed the thematic analysis of anonymized survey comments according to published guidelines. RESULTS: Physicians identified contextual and relational factors that contributed to moral distress and work-related stress. Combined sources of distress created high work-related demands that were not always matched by equally high resources or mitigated by work-related rewards. An imbalance between demands and rewards could lead to undesirable individual and collective consequences. INTERPRETATION: Moral distress is experienced variably by ICU physicians and is linked to contextual and relational factors. Future studies should evaluate modifiable factors such as team interactions and the role of professional rewards as mitigators of distress to bring new insights into strategies to improve ICU clinician wellness and patient care.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos , Médicos , Humanos , Canadá , Estudios Transversales , Principios Morales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estrés Psicológico/etiología , Actitud del Personal de Salud
14.
Crit Care Explor ; 5(3): e0879, 2023 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36895887

RESUMEN

Moral distress is common among critical care physicians and can impact negatively healthcare individuals and institutions. Better understanding inter-individual variability in moral distress is needed to inform future wellness interventions. OBJECTIVES: To explore when and how critical care physicians experience moral distress in the workplace and its consequences, how physicians' professional interactions with colleagues affected their perceived level of moral distress, and in which circumstances professional rewards were experienced and mitigated moral distress. DESIGN: Interview-based qualitative study using inductive thematic analysis. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Twenty critical care physicians practicing in Canadian ICUs who expressed interest in participating in a semi-structured interview after completion of a national, cross-sectional survey of moral distress in ICU physicians. RESULTS: Study participants described different ways to perceive and resolve morally challenging clinical situations, which were grouped into four clinical moral orientations: virtuous, resigned, deferring, and empathic. Moral orientations resulted from unique combinations of strength of personal moral beliefs and perceived power over moral clinical decision-making, which led to different rationales for moral decision-making. Study findings illustrate how sociocultural, legal, and clinical contexts influenced individual physicians' moral orientation and how moral orientation altered perceived moral distress and moral satisfaction. The degree of dissonance between individual moral orientations within care team determined, in part, the quantity of "negative judgments" and/or "social support" that physicians obtained from their colleagues. The levels of moral distress, moral satisfaction, social judgment, and social support ultimately affected the type and severity of the negative consequences experienced by ICU physicians. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: An expanded understanding of moral orientations provides an additional tool to address the problem of moral distress in the critical care setting. Diversity in moral orientations may explain, in part, the variability in moral distress levels among clinicians and likely contributes to interpersonal conflicts in the ICU setting. Additional investigations on different moral orientations in various clinical environments are much needed to inform the design of effective systemic and institutional interventions that address healthcare professionals' moral distress and mitigate its negative consequences.

15.
Crit Care Med ; 40(5): 1506-12, 2012 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22511132

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Family satisfaction with critical care is influenced by a variety of factors. We investigated the relationship between measures of organizational and safety culture, and family satisfaction in critical care. We further explored differences in this relationship depending on intensive care unit survival status and length of intensive care unit stay of the patient. DESIGN: Cross-sectional surveys. SETTING: Twenty-three tertiary and community intensive care units within three provinces in Canada. SUBJECTS: One thousand two-hundred eighty-five respondents from 2374 intensive care unit clinical staff, and 880 respondents from 1381 family members of intensive care unit patients. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Intensive care unit staff completed the Organization and Management of Intensive Care Units survey and the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture. Family members completed the Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit 24, a validated survey of family satisfaction. A priori, we analyzed adjusted relationships between each domain score from the culture surveys and either satisfaction with care or satisfaction with decision-making for each of four subgroups of family members according to patient descriptors: intensive care unit survivors who had length of intensive care unit stay <14 days or >14 days, and intensive care unit nonsurvivors who had length of stay <14 days or ≥14 days. We found strong positive relationships between most domains of organizational and safety culture, and satisfaction with care or decision-making for family members of intensive care unit nonsurvivors who spent at least 14 days in the intensive care unit. For the other three groups, there were only a few weak relationships between domains of organizational and safety culture and family satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the effect of organizational culture on care delivery is most easily detectable by family members of the most seriously ill patients who interact frequently with intensive care unit staff, who are intensive care unit nonsurvivors, and who spend a longer time in the intensive care unit. Positive relationships between measures of organizational and safety culture and family satisfaction suggest that by improving organizational culture, we may also improve family satisfaction.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos/organización & administración , Familia , Cultura Organizacional , Satisfacción del Paciente , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Canadá , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Estudios Transversales , Recolección de Datos , Familia/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/normas , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Seguridad del Paciente , Factores Sexuales
16.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 181(9): 1003-11, 2010 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20430926

RESUMEN

RATIONALE: One in three Americans under 65 years of age does not have health insurance during some portion of each year. Patients who are critically ill and lack health insurance may be at particularly high risk of morbidity and mortality due to the high cost of intensive care. OBJECTIVES: To systematically review the medical and nonmedical literature to determine whether differences in critical care access, delivery, and outcomes are associated with health insurance status. METHODS: Nine electronic databases (inception to 11 April 2008) were independently screened and abstracted in duplicate. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: From 5,508 citations, 29 observational studies met eligibility criteria. Among the general U.S. population, patients who were uninsured were less likely to receive critical care services than those with insurance (odds ratio [OR], 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55-0.56). Once admitted to the intensive care unit, patients who were uninsured had 8.5% (95% CI, 6.0-11.1) fewer procedures, were more likely to experience hospital discharge delays (OR 4.51; 95% CI, 1.46-13.93), and were more likely to have life support withdrawn (OR 2.80; 95% CI, 1.12-7.02). Lack of insurance may confer an independent risk of death for patients who are critically ill (OR 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01-1.33). Patients in managed care systems had 14.3% (95% CI, 11.5-17.2) fewer procedures in intensive care, but were also less likely to receive "potentially ineffective" care. Differences in unmeasured confounding factors may contribute to these findings. CONCLUSIONS: Patients in the United States who are critically ill and do not have health insurance receive fewer critical care services and may experience worse clinical outcomes. Improving preexisting health care coverage, as opposed to solely delivering more critical care services, may be one mechanism to reduce such disparities.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica , Atención a la Salud/tendencias , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Seguro de Salud/tendencias , Enfermedad Crítica/mortalidad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
17.
Ann Am Thorac Soc ; 18(8): 1343-1351, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33356972

RESUMEN

Rationale: Understanding the magnitude of moral distress and its associations may point to solutions. Objectives: To understand the magnitude of moral distress and other measures of wellness in Canadian critical care physicians, to determine any associations among these measures, and to identify potentially modifiable factors. Methods: This was an online survey of Canadian critical care physicians whose e-mail addresses were registered with either the Canadian Critical Care Society or the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. We used validated measures of moral distress, burnout, compassion fatigue, compassion satisfaction, and resilience. We also measured selected individual, practice, and workload characteristics. Results: Of the 499 physicians surveyed, 239 (48%) responded and there were 225 usable surveys. Respondents reported moderate scores of moral distress (107 ± 59; mean ± standard deviation, maximum 432), one-third of respondents had considered leaving or had previously left a position because of moral distress, about one-third met criteria for burnout syndrome, and a similar proportion reported medium-high scores of compassion fatigue. In contrast, about one-half of respondents reported a high score of compassion satisfaction, and overall, respondents reported a moderate score of resilience. Each of the "negative" wellness measures (moral distress, burnout, and compassion fatigue) were associated directly with each of the other "negative" wellness measures, and inversely with each of the "positive" wellness measures (compassion satisfaction and resilience), but moral distress was not associated with resilience. Moral distress was lower in respondents who were married or partnered compared with those who were not, and the prevalence of burnout was lower in respondents who had been in practice for longer. There were no differences in any of the wellness measures between adult and pediatric critical care physicians. Conclusions: Canadian critical care physicians report moderate scores of moral distress, burnout, and compassionate fatigue, and moderate-high scores of compassion satisfaction and resilience. We found no modifiable factors associated with any wellness measures. Further quantitative and qualitative studies are needed to identify interventions to reduce moral distress, burnout, and compassion fatigue.


Asunto(s)
Satisfacción en el Trabajo , Médicos , Adulto , Canadá , Niño , Cuidados Críticos , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Principios Morales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
18.
CMAJ ; 182(16): E747-52, 2010 Nov 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20921249

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: High-quality end-of-life care should be the right of every Canadian. The objective of this study was to identify aspects of end-of-life care that are high in priority as targets for improvement using feedback elicited from patients and their families. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, cross-sectional survey involving patients with advanced, life-limiting illnesses and their family caregivers. We administered the Canadian Health Care Evaluation Project (CANHELP) questionnaire along with a global rating question to measure satisfaction with end-of-life care. We derived the relative importance of individual questions on the CANHELP questionnaire from their association with a global rating of satisfaction, as determined using Pearson correlation coefficients. To determine high-priority issues, we identified questions that had scores indicating high importance and low satisfaction. RESULTS: We approached 471 patients and 255 family members, of whom 363 patients and 193 family members participated, with response rates of 77% for patients and 76% for families. From the perspective of patients, high-priority areas needing improvement were related to feelings of peace, to assessment and treatment of emotional problems, to physician availability and to satisfaction that the physician took a personal interest in them, communicated clearly and consistently, and listened. From the perspective of family members, similar areas were identified as high in priority, along with the additional areas of timely information about the patient's condition and discussions with the doctor about final location of care and use of end-of-life technology. INTERPRETATION: End-of-life care in Canada may be improved for patients and their families by providing better psychological and spiritual support, better planning of care and enhanced relationships with physicians, especially in aspects related to communication and decision-making.


Asunto(s)
Actitud Frente a la Muerte , Cuidadores/psicología , Calidad de Vida , Cuidado Terminal/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Canadá , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Cuidados Paliativos al Final de la Vida/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Cuidados Paliativos/psicología , Prioridad del Paciente , Satisfacción del Paciente , Relaciones Profesional-Familia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Cuidado Terminal/psicología , Enfermo Terminal/psicología , Gestión de la Calidad Total
19.
J Intensive Care Med ; 25(3): 149-55, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20097666

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To describe the total and regional capacity for critical care in British Columbia (BC), Canada, and to describe regional variation in number of intensive care units (ICUs), size of ICUs, length of ICU stay, ICU occupancy, key processes of critical care, and hospital mortality for ICU patients in B.C. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we used retrospectively collected data from all patients admitted to an ICU in BC between April 1, 1998, and March 31, 1999, and responses to a survey about organizational factors for all ICUs in BC that was done in 2001 and updated in 2008. RESULTS: The number of ICU beds in each geographic region in BC is inversely related to the population density and population growth within those regions. In addition, the distribution of ICU beds does not match the distribution of specialized and high-risk clinical services. There is wide variation by geographic region and by size of ICU in physician and nurse staffing, physician model of care, availability and participation of respiratory therapists, and other support services in clinical care and in reported use of clinical practice guidelines. CONCLUSION: Variation and lack of availability of key processes for care of critically ill patients in this population identifies opportunities for knowledge translation and systematic improvement including regionalization of care.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Programas Médicos Regionales/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Colombia Británica , Competencia Clínica/normas , Estudios Transversales , Tamaño de las Instituciones de Salud , Capacidad de Camas en Hospitales , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/tendencias , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermeras Administradoras/educación , Enfermeras Administradoras/estadística & datos numéricos , Ejecutivos Médicos/educación , Ejecutivos Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Densidad de Población , Estudios Retrospectivos , Desempleo/estadística & datos numéricos , Recursos Humanos
20.
Palliat Med ; 24(7): 682-95, 2010 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20605850

RESUMEN

The purpose of this study was to further validate a novel instrument to measure satisfaction with end-of-life care, called the Canadian Health Care Evaluation Project (CANHELP) questionnaire. Data were collected by a cross-sectional survey of patients who had advanced, life-limiting illnesses and their family caregivers, and who completed CANHELP, a global rating of satisfaction, and a quality of life questionnaire. We conducted factor analysis, assessed internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha, and evaluated construct validity by describing the correlation amongst CANHELP, global rating of satisfaction and the quality of life questionnaire scores. There were 361 patient and 193 family questionnaires available for analysis. In the factor analysis, we identified six easily interpretable factors which explained 55.4% and 60.2% of the variance for the patient and caregiver questionnaire, respectively. For the patient version, the subscales derived from these factors were Relationship with Doctors, Illness Management, Communication, Decision-Making, Role of the Family, and Your Well-being. For the family questionnaire, the factors were Relationship with Doctors, Characteristics of Doctors and Nurses, Illness Management, Communication and Decision-Making, Your Involvement, and Your Well-being. Each subscale for each questionnaire had acceptable to excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.69-0.94). We observed good correlations between the CANHELP overall satisfaction score and global rating of satisfaction (correlation coefficient 0.49 and 0.63 for patient and family, respectively) which was greater than the correlations between CANHELP and the quality of life instruments. We conclude that the CANHELP Questionnaire is a valid and internally consistent instrument to measure satisfaction with end-of-life care.


Asunto(s)
Cuidadores/psicología , Cuidados Paliativos/psicología , Satisfacción del Paciente , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Cuidado Terminal/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Canadá , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuidados Paliativos/normas , Proyectos de Investigación , Cuidado Terminal/normas , Enfermo Terminal
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA