Is trofinetide a future treatment for Rett syndrome? A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Rett syndrome (RTT) is a rare, life-threatening, genetic neurodevelopmental disorder. Treatment in RTT encounters many challenges. Trofinetide, a modified amino-terminal tripeptide of insulin-like growth factor 1, has demonstrated clinically promising results in RTT. In this study, trofinetide efficacy and safety in RTT are systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed. METHODS: A systematic search of five electronic databases was conducted until January 2024. Review Manager 5.4 software was used for the analysis. The analysis was based on a weighted mean difference and standard error with a confidence interval (CI) of 95%, and a statistically significant P-value was considered if it was < 0.05. The study was registered on PROSPERO with registration number CRD42024499849. Quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE. RESULTS: Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 276 patients were included in the analysis. Trofinetide improved both caregiver outcomes and clinical scales by improving the Rett Syndrome Behavior Questionnaire (RSBQ) (mean difference (MD): - 3.46 points, 95% CI: - 5.63 to - 1.27, P = 0.0002) and Clinical Global Impression Scale-Improvement (CGI-I) (MD: - 0.35, 95% CI: - 0.51 to - 0.18, P < 0.0001), respectively. However, trofinetide neither improved the Caregiver Top 3 Concerns Visual Analog Scale nor the Rett Motor Behavioral Assessment. Regarding safety, trofinetide was significantly associated with vomiting compared to placebo (odds ratio (OR): 3.17, 95% CI: 1.57 to 6.43, P = 0.001). After solving heterogeneity, results showed a statistically significant incidence of diarrhea in the trofinetide (200 mg) group compared to placebo (OR: 18.51, 95% CI: 9.30 to 36.84, P ≤ 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: Trofinetide demonstrated statistically significant improvements in CGI-I and RSBQ in pediatrics and adult patients with Rett. Side effects are limited to vomiting and diarrhea. Although diarrhea yielded an insignificant result in our analysis, it emerged as a cause for treatment discontinuation in the participating trials, and a statistically significant risk for diarrhea emerged when excluding the study using a lower dose of the drug, hence causing heterogeneity, in the meta-analysis. Given the diverse genetic landscape of RTT, future RCTs investigating correlations between RTT genotype and phenotypic improvements by trofinetide will be beneficial. RCTs encompassing male patients with larger and longer cohorts are recommended.

Safety and efficacy of trofinetide in Rett syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

INTRODUCTION: Rett syndrome is a rare genetic neurodevelopmental disorder that predominantly impacts females. It presents with loss of acquired skills, impaired communication, and stereotypic hand movements. Given the limited treatment options for Rett syndrome, there is a dire need for effective interventions. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of trofinetide in Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) that report on Rett syndrome patients. METHODS: We identified 109 articles from four databases (Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL). After removing the duplicates, we narrowed them down to 59 articles for further assessment. We included RCTs that evaluated the efficacy and safety of trofinetide in patients with Rett syndrome. Three studies were eligible for inclusion. Two independent reviewers evaluated the identified studies' titles, abstracts, and full texts, extracting pertinent data. We assessed the quality of the studies using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB) 2.0 tool. We then conducted a meta-analysis using the fixed effects model in the case of insignificant heterogeneity; otherwise, we used the random effects model. Based on the nature of the outcome, we analyzed the mean difference or the odds ratio. Analysis was conducted using RevMan version 5.3. RESULTS: Among the analyzed outcomes in 181 patients in the trofinetide group and 134 patients in the placebo group, significant improvement in Rett Syndrome Behavior Questionnaire (RSBQ) scores was observed at 200 mg dosage (overall mean difference: -3.53, p = 0.001). Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scores improved considerably at 200 mg dosage (overall mean difference: -0.34, p < 0.0001). No substantial changes were observed in Motor Behavioral Assessment (MBA) or Top 3 Caregiver Concerns. We evaluated Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) across the various dosages and noted significant associations with diarrhea (200 mg), vomiting (200 mg), and irritability (200 mg). However, we did not find a significant association between any of the dosages and the incidence of decreased appetite. CONCLUSION: Trofinetide demonstrated potential in improving RSBQ and CGI-I scores at 200 mg dosage. Although no substantial changes were found in MBA and top 3 caregiver concerns. Adverse events were linked to specific dosages.

Managing Gastrointestinal Symptoms Resulting from Treatment with Trofinetide for Rett Syndrome: Caregiver and Nurse Perspectives.

Rett syndrome (RTT) is a rare genetic neurodevelopmental disorder mainly affecting female individuals. Trofinetide was recently approved as the first treatment for RTT, largely on the basis of results from the phase 3 LAVENDER trial, in which trofinetide showed improvements in core symptoms of RTT compared with placebo. However, gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms such as diarrhea and vomiting were commonly reported side effects, and taste was also a reported issue. The objective of this article is to describe the perspectives of five caregivers of girls in trofinetide clinical trials as well as those of three nurse trial coordinators, with a focus on management of GI symptoms of trofinetide treatment.Audio Abstract available for this article. Audio Abstract: Jane Lane provides an overview and discusses key findings of the article titled "Managing Gastrointestinal Symptoms Resulting from Treatment with Trofinetide for Rett Syndrome: Caregiver and Nurse Perspectives." (MP4 83274 KB).

Trofinetide Treatment Demonstrates a Benefit Over Placebo for the Ability to Communicate in Rett Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Trofinetide was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of Rett syndrome (RTT) in March 2023. Benefiting the ability to communicate in RTT is often identified as the most important caregiver goal for new therapies. This analysis reports the communication-related end points from the phase 3 LAVENDER study of trofinetide in RTT. METHODS: Females with RTT, aged five to 20 years, were randomized 1:1 to trofinetide or placebo for 12 weeks. Secondary efficacy end points related to communication were based on change from baseline to week 12 and included the caregiver-rated Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales Developmental Profile™ Infant-Toddler Checklist (CSBS-DP-IT) Social Composite score (key secondary end point; scores ranged from 0 to 26 [higher scores indicated better communication]) and novel clinician rating scales (0 [normal] to 7 [severe impairment]) measuring the ability to communicate choices nonverbally (RTT-COMC) and verbally (RTT-VCOM). RESULTS: Trofinetide demonstrated a statistically significant difference versus placebo for the CSBS-DP-IT Social Composite score (least squares mean [LSM] difference = 1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3 to 1.7; P = 0.0064; Cohen's d effect size = 0.43) and a nominally significant difference for the RTT-COMC (LSM difference: -0.3; 95% CI, -0.6 to -0.0; P = 0.0257; Cohen's d effect size = 0.36). As expected, there was no difference for the RTT-VCOM. CONCLUSIONS: Significant treatment benefit for trofinetide versus placebo was observed in scales measuring the ability to communicate. These scales may be appropriate for future clinical studies in RTT and other neurodevelopmental disorders.

Exposure-Response Efficacy Modeling to Support Trofinetide Dosing in Individuals with Rett Syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Trofinetide was recently approved for the treatment of Rett syndrome (RTT) on the basis of the efficacy and safety findings of the phase 3 LAVENDER study, which used a body weight-based dosing regimen. Exposure-response (E-R) efficacy modeling was used to characterize relationships between trofinetide exposure measures (maximum drug concentration and area under the concentration-time curve for the dosing interval of 0-12 h [AUC0-12]) and efficacy endpoints in RTT clinical studies to support the trofinetide dosing regimen. METHODS: Efficacy endpoints were modeled using trofinetide exposure measures predicted from the population pharmacokinetic model and Bayesian estimates. The analysis population for each E-R model comprised individuals receiving placebo or trofinetide who had available trofinetide exposure measures. Efficacy endpoints were scores from the Rett Syndrome Behaviour Questionnaire (RSBQ), the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement, the Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales Developmental Profile™ Infant-Toddler Checklist (CSBS-DP-IT) Social Composite, and the Rett Syndrome Clinician Rating of Ability to Communicate Choices (RTT-COMC). RESULTS: Higher trofinetide exposure was associated with improvements in RSBQ, CSBS-DP-IT Social Composite, and RTT-COMC scores. Assuming target trofinetide AUC0-12 values of 800-1200 µg·h/mL, the reductions in RSBQ total scores at week 12 were approximately five- to seven-fold greater with trofinetide (range 3.55-4.94) versus placebo (0.76). Significant E-R relationships were also found for the CSBS-DP-IT Social Composite and RTT-COMC scores. CONCLUSION: E-R efficacy modeling demonstrated significant relationships between trofinetide exposure and RSBQ, CSBS-DP-IT Social Composite, and RTT-COMC scores. Trofinetide is efficacious within the target exposure range, supporting the approved dosing regimen for trofinetide. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01703533, NCT02715115, NCT04181723.

Trofinetide is the first approved treatment for people living with Rett syndrome, a rare genetic condition affecting brain development. This approval was based on the findings of clinical studies in which trofinetide showed significant improvements in the symptoms of Rett syndrome. In this study researchers were looking to see if the level of trofinetide in the blood was related to the level of improvement in symptoms observed in clinical studies. Information on the effectiveness of trofinetide was obtained from the phase 3 LAVENDER study which used doses of trofinetide according to body weight. Trofinetide's effectiveness was assessed on the basis of clinical measurements of key Rett syndrome symptoms. All the information on trofinetide dose, blood levels, and how much symptoms changed (i.e., effectiveness of trofinetide) was then used to develop models to predict symptom responses in the observed population. Researchers found that as the blood levels of trofinetide increased the symptom improvement also increased. When the blood levels were at the recommended level that was achieved in the LAVENDER study, the model predicted that symptom improvement was up to seven times greater with trofinetide than having no treatment (i.e., placebo). This study shows a positive relationship between trofinetide blood levels and improvement in the symptoms of Rett syndrome. Trofinetide was effective within the recommended blood level range in the LAVENDER study using the approved weight-based dosing.

Effect of Hepatic Impairment on Trofinetide Exposures Using an In Silico Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model.

INTRODUCTION: Trofinetide is the first drug to be approved for the treatment of Rett syndrome. Hepatic impairment is not expected to affect the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of trofinetide because of predominant renal excretion. This study was conducted to help understand the potential impact of any hepatic impairment on trofinetide PK. METHODS: This study used physiologically based PK modeling to estimate trofinetide exposure (maximum drug concentration and area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity) in virtual patients with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment (per Child-Pugh classification) compared with virtual healthy subjects following a 12 g oral trofinetide dose. RESULTS: In individual deterministic simulations for matched individuals and stochastic simulations at the population level (100 virtual individuals simulated per population), as anticipated, predicted plasma exposures were similar for healthy subjects and for patients with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment. However, predicted blood concentration exposures slightly increased with increasing severity of hepatic impairment because of change in hematocrit levels. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that hepatic impairment is not expected to have a clinically relevant effect on exposure to trofinetide.

Trofinetide is the first approved treatment for Rett syndrome, a rare genetic condition that affects brain development. When a person takes trofinetide, most is removed from the body via the urine in its unchanged form (no chemical alteration). Regulatory requirements mean researchers must confirm the safety of any pharmaceutical drug and evaluate whether changes in liver function lead to harmful levels of drug exposure. Researchers used a computer model to predict how much trofinetide would be present in the blood and plasma (the liquid portion of blood) over time in virtual healthy subjects and virtual patients with varying degrees of liver disease (mild, moderate, or severe). Computer simulations showed that predicted trofinetide levels in plasma were similar in virtual healthy subjects and each virtual patient group with liver disease. Predicted levels of trofinetide in blood were slightly elevated with increasing severity of liver disease. This is because people with liver disease have fewer red blood cells, so the cell portion of blood becomes smaller relative to the liquid portion (plasma), which leads to higher trofinetide concentrations in whole blood (trofinetide minimally enters the red blood cell). The small increase in trofinetide levels in blood and the absence of any change in trofinetide levels in plasma means that people with Rett syndrome and liver disease are unlikely to be exposed to harmful levels of trofinetide after a 12 g oral dose.

Rett Syndrome and the Role of MECP2: Signaling to Clinical Trials.

Rett syndrome (RTT) is a neurological disorder that mostly affects females, with a frequency of 1 in 10,000 to 20,000 live birth cases. Symptoms include stereotyped hand movements; impaired learning, language, and communication skills; sudden loss of speech; reduced lifespan; retarded growth; disturbance of sleep and breathing; seizures; autism; and gait apraxia. Pneumonia is the most common cause of death for patients with Rett syndrome, with a survival rate of 77.8% at 25 years of age. Survival into the fifth decade is typical in Rett syndrome, and the leading cause of death is cardiorespiratory compromise. Rett syndrome progression has multiple stages; however, most phenotypes are associated with the nervous system and brain. In total, 95% of Rett syndrome cases are due to mutations in the MECP2 gene, an X-linked gene that encodes for the methyl CpG binding protein, a regulator of gene expression. In this review, we summarize the recent developments in the field of Rett syndrome and therapeutics targeting MECP2.

Trofinetide for the treatment of Rett syndrome: Results from the open-label extension LILAC study.

BACKGROUND: Trofinetide was approved for the treatment of Rett syndrome based on the results of the phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled, 12-week LAVENDER study. Rett syndrome is a chronic disorder requiring long-term treatment. We report the efficacy and safety results of LILAC, a 40-week, open-label extension study of LAVENDER. METHODS: Females with Rett syndrome aged 5-21 years received open-label treatment with trofinetide for 40 weeks. The primary endpoint was long-term safety of trofinetide; secondary endpoints included the change from baseline at week 40 in the Rett Syndrome Behaviour Questionnaire score and the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement score at week 40. FINDINGS: Overall, 154 participants were enrolled and treated with trofinetide in LILAC. The most common adverse events in LILAC were diarrhea (74.7%), vomiting (28.6%), and COVID-19 (11.0%). Diarrhea was the most common adverse event leading to treatment withdrawal (21.4%). The Rett Syndrome Behaviour Questionnaire mean score (standard error) improvement from the LAVENDER baseline to week 40 in LILAC was -7.3 (1.62) and -7.0 (1.61) for participants treated with trofinetide and placebo in LAVENDER, respectively. Mean Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scores (standard error) at week 40 rated from the LILAC baseline were 3.1 (0.11) and 3.2 (0.14) for participants treated with trofinetide and placebo in LAVENDER, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with trofinetide for ≤40 weeks continued to improve symptoms of Rett syndrome. Trofinetide had a similar safety profile in LILAC as in LAVENDER. FUNDING: The study was supported by Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc. (San Diego, CA, USA). This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04279314).

Recommendations for the management of gastrointestinal comorbidities with or without trofinetide use in Rett syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Although gastrointestinal (GI) comorbidities are experienced by over 90% of individuals with Rett syndrome (RTT), a neurodevelopmental disorder associated with mutations in the MECP2 gene, many neurologists and pediatricians do not rank the management of these comorbidities among the most important treatment goals for RTT. Trofinetide, the first approved pharmacologic treatment for RTT, confers improvements in RTT symptoms but is associated with adverse GI events, primarily diarrhea and vomiting. Treatment strategies for GI comorbidities and drug-associated symptoms in RTT represent an unmet clinical need. AREAS COVERED: This perspective covers GI comorbidities experienced by those with RTT, either with or without trofinetide treatment. PubMed literature searches were undertaken on treatment recommendations for the following conditions: constipation, diarrhea, vomiting, aspiration, dysphagia, gastroesophageal reflux, nausea, gastroparesis, gastritis, and abdominal bloating. EXPERT OPINION: The authors recommend a proactive approach to management of symptomatic GI comorbidities and drug-associated symptoms in RTT to enhance drug tolerance and improve the quality of life of affected individuals. Management strategies for common GI comorbidities associated with RTT are reviewed based on authors' clinical experience and augmented by recommendations from the literature.

Trofinetide for the treatment of Rett syndrome: Long-term safety and efficacy results of the 32-month, open-label LILAC-2 study.

BACKGROUND: Trofinetide was approved for the treatment of Rett syndrome (RTT) in patients aged ≥2 years based on the results of the 12-week, randomized, phase 3 LAVENDER study. In LILAC, a 40-week, open-label extension study of LAVENDER, trofinetide continued to improve the symptoms of RTT, with a similar safety profile as LAVENDER. Here, we report long-term safety and efficacy results of LILAC-2, a 32-month, open-label extension study. METHODS: Females aged 5-22 years who completed LILAC were eligible to enter LILAC-2. Safety and tolerability were assessed with the incidence of adverse events (AEs). Efficacy was assessed with Rett Syndrome Behaviour Questionnaire (RSBQ) and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scores. Caregiver interviews explored the patient's experience with RTT and the efficacy of trofinetide during study participation. FINDINGS: In total, 77 participants were enrolled in LILAC-2. The most common AEs were diarrhea (53.2%), COVID-19 (27.3%), and vomiting (19.5%). The mean (standard error [SE]) change in RSBQ score from LAVENDER baseline to week 104 of LILAC-2 was -11.8 (2.45). The mean (SE) CGI-I score from LILAC baseline to week 12 of LILAC-2 was 3.1 (0.10). Most caregivers (96%; n = 24/25) were satisfied or very satisfied with the benefits of trofinetide. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term treatment with trofinetide continued to improve RTT symptoms, without new safety concerns. Caregivers reported satisfaction with trofinetide related to improvements that were meaningful for their child and themselves. FUNDING: The study was supported by Acadia Pharmaceuticals (San Diego, CA, USA). This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04776746.

A Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling Approach to Assess the Potential for Drug Interactions Between Trofinetide and CYP3A4-Metabolized Drugs.

PURPOSE: Trofinetide is the first drug to be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for use in the treatment of patients with Rett syndrome, a multisystem disorder requiring multimodal therapies. Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 metabolizes >50% of therapeutic drugs and is the CYP isozyme most commonly expressed in the liver and intestines. In vitro studies suggest the concentration of trofinetide producing 50% inhibition (IC50) of CYP3A4 is >15 mmol/L; that concentration was much greater than the target clinical concentration associated with the maximal intended therapeutic dose (12 g). Thus, trofinetide has a low potential for drug-drug interactions in the liver. However, there is potential for drug-drug interactions in the intestines given the oral route of administration and expected relatively high concentration in the gastrointestinal tract after dose administration. METHODS: Using a validated physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model, deterministic and stochastic simulations were used for assessing the PK properties related to exposure and bioavailability of midazolam (sensitive index substrate for CYP3A4) following an oral (15 mg) or intravenous (2 mg) dose, with and without single-dose and steady-state (12 g) coadministration of oral trofinetide. FINDINGS: Following coadministration of intravenous midazolam and oral trofinetide, the PK properties of midazolam were unchanged. The trofinetide concentration in the gut wall was >15 mmol/L during the first 1.5 hours after dosing. With the coadministration of oral midazolam and trofinetide, the model predicted increases in fraction of dose reaching the portal vein, bioavailability, Cmax, and AUCinf of 30%, 30%, 18%, and 30%, respectively. IMPLICATIONS: In this study that used a PBPK modeling approach, it was shown that CYP3A4 enzyme activity in the liver was not affected by trofinetide coadministration, but trofinetide was predicted to be a weak inhibitor of intestinal CYP3A4 metabolism after oral administration at therapeutic doses.

2023 FDA TIDES (Peptides and Oligonucleotides) Harvest.

A total of nine TIDES (pepTIDES and oligonucleoTIDES) were approved by the FDA during 2023. The four approved oligonucleotides are indicated for various types of disorders, including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, geographic atrophy, primary hyperoxaluria type 1, and polyneuropathy of hereditary transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis. All oligonucleotides show chemically modified structures to enhance their stability and therapeutic effectiveness as antisense or aptamer oligomers. Some of them demonstrate various types of conjugation to driving ligands. The approved peptides comprise various structures, including linear, cyclic, and lipopeptides, and have diverse applications. Interestingly, the FDA has granted its first orphan drug designation for a peptide-based drug as a highly selective chemokine antagonist. Furthermore, Rett syndrome has found its first-ever core symptoms treatment, which is also peptide-based. Here, we analyze the TIDES approved in 2023 on the basis of their chemical structure, medical target, mode of action, administration route, and common adverse effects.

Insulin-Like Growth Factor 1 Has the Potential to Be Used as a Diagnostic Tool and Treatment Target for Autism Spectrum Disorders.

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD), a heterogeneous group of neurodevelopmental disorders, is characterized by social impairment and repetitive and stereotypic behaviors. Because of the lack of approved laboratory diagnostic markers and effective therapeutic medications, it is one of the most challenging diseases. Therefore, it is urgent to explore potential diagnosis markers or therapeutic targets. Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) is a neurotrophic growth factor that enhances brain development. IGF-1 levels in body fluids are lower in preschool children with ASD than in typically developing children, which may serve as a potential diagnostic marker. In various ASD models associated with genetic or environmental exposure, IGF-1 treatment can improve core symptoms or pathological changes, including neuronal development, neural cell survival, balance of synaptic excitation and inhibition, neuroimmunology, and oxidative stress status. In March 2023 an IGF-1 derivative was approved as the first drug for treating Rett syndrome, an ASD-related neurodevelopmental disorder, to improve fundamental symptoms such as social communication. Thus, in this review, we present accumulating evidence of altered IGF-1 levels in ASD patients and the possible mechanisms, as well as evidence that IGF-1 treatment improves the pathophysiology in various ASD models. IGF-1 has the potential to be an early diagnosis marker and an effective therapeutic for ASD.

Trofinetide in Rett syndrome: A brief review of safety and efficacy.

Rett syndrome (RTT) is a rare genetic neurological disorder that primarily affects girls and is caused by mainly mutations in the methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MECP2) gene, leading to critical issues in normal brain function. The condition has a global prevalence of 5 to 10 cases per 100,000 females, and there is currently no cure for RTT. However, therapy is available to manage the symptoms and improve quality of life. Trofinetide, an insulin-like growth factor 1, was originally developed as a stroke medication and progressed to Phase II clinical trials, where it exhibited favorable safety and efficacy profiles by improving several core RTT symptoms. Recently, Trofinetide received the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval and orphan drug designation for the treatment of RTT, making it the first approved drug for this rare genetic disorder. It has also shown to be safe, well-tolerated and with no known drug interactions. These findings suggest that Trofinetide is a promising treatment option for individuals with RTT.

Concise Overview of Glypromate Neuropeptide Research: From Chemistry to Pharmacological Applications in Neurosciences.

Neurodegenerative diseases of the central nervous system (CNS) pose a serious health concern worldwide, with a particular incidence in developed countries as a result of life expectancy increase and the absence of restorative treatments. Presently, treatments for these neurological conditions are focused on managing the symptoms and/or slowing down their progression. As so, the research on novel neuroprotective drugs is of high interest. Glypromate (glycyl-l-prolyl-l-glutamic acid, also known as GPE), an endogenous small peptide widespread in the brain, holds great promise to tackle neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, and Huntington's, s well as other CNS-related disorders like Rett and Down's syndromes. However, the limited pharmacokinetic properties of Glypromate hinder its clinical application. As such, intense research has been devoted to leveraging the pharmacokinetic profile of this neuropeptide. This review aims to offer an updated perspective on Glypromate research by exploring the vast array of chemical derivatizations of more than 100 analogs described in the literature over the past two decades. The collection and discussion of the most relevant structure-activity relationships will hopefully guide the discovery of new Glypromate-based neuroprotective drugs.

Trofinetide for Rett Syndrome: Highlights on the Development and Related Inventions of the First USFDA-Approved Treatment for Rare Pediatric Unmet Medical Need.

Rett syndrome (RTT) is a rare disability causing female-oriented pediatric neurodevelopmental unmet medical need. RTT was recognized in 1966. However, over the past 56 years, the United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) has authorized no effective treatment for RTT. Recently, Trofinetide was approved by the USFDA on 10 March 2023 as the first RTT treatment. This article underlines the pharmaceutical advancement, patent literature, and prospects of Trofinetide. The data for this study were gathered from the PubMed database, authentic websites (Acadia Pharmaceuticals, Neuren Pharmaceuticals, and USFDA), and free patent databases. Trofinetide was first disclosed by Neuren Pharmaceuticals in 2000 as a methyl group containing analog of the naturally occurring neuroprotective tripeptide called glycine-proline-glutamate (GPE). The joint efforts of Acadia Pharmaceuticals and Neuren Pharmaceuticals have developed Trofinetide. The mechanism of action of Trofinetide is not yet well established. However, it is supposed to improve neuronal morphology and synaptic functioning. The patent literature revealed a handful of inventions related to Trofinetide, providing excellent and unexplored broad research possibilities with Trofinetide. The development of innovative Trofinetide-based molecules, combinations of Trofinetide, patient-compliant drug formulations, and precise MECP2-mutation-related personalized medicines are foreseeable. Trofinetide is in clinical trials for some neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), including treating Fragile X syndrome (FXS). It is expected that Trofinetide may be approved for treating FXS in the future. The USFDA-approval of Trofinetide is one of the important milestones for RTT therapy and is the beginning of a new era for the therapy of RTT, FXS, autism spectrum disorder (ASD), brain injury, stroke, and other NDDs.

A review of the Rett Syndrome Behaviour Questionnaire and its utilization in the assessment of symptoms associated with Rett syndrome.

The Rett Syndrome Behaviour Questionnaire (RSBQ), which is completed by the caregiver, is one of the most widely used efficacy measures in clinical studies of Rett syndrome (RTT) due to its specificity to the core features of RTT. As healthcare providers participate in routine healthcare assessments of individuals with RTT in clinical practice, there is a need for these providers to understand the psychometric properties of the RSBQ and how it relates to the core clinical features of RTT. Here, we describe the characteristics of the RSBQ, review the literature on its validity and reliability as well as its performance in a phase 2 study and the recent phase 3 LAVENDER study. The RSBQ was first shown to discriminate RTT from other intellectual disorders with good inter-rater and test-retest reliability scores. It was subsequently validated as an appropriate instrument for measuring behavior in females with RTT and adopted as a clinical trial outcome. In LAVENDER, the FDA-approved drug trofinetide significantly improved the RSBQ total score over placebo in girls and women with RTT and change from baseline for all RSBQ subscores were directionally in favor of trofinetide. The change in RSBQ was aligned with the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale, suggesting that improvement in behavioral components may be related to overall clinical status. Given its validity and ubiquity in RTT clinical studies, it is important that the interplay of the domains and the psychometric profile of the RSBQ are understood.

Development of trofinetide for the treatment of Rett syndrome: from bench to bedside.

Rett syndrome (RTT) is rare neurodevelopmental disorder caused by mutations in the MECP2 gene that encodes methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MeCP2), a DNA-binding protein with roles in epigenetic regulation of gene expression. Functional loss of MeCP2 results in abnormal neuronal maturation and plasticity, characterized by loss of verbal communication and loss of fine and gross motor function, among others. Trofinetide, a synthetic analog of glycine-proline-glutamate, was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of RTT in adult and pediatric patients aged 2 years and older. Here, we present the development of trofinetide from bench research to clinical studies and emphasize how the collaboration between academia, the pharmaceutical industry, and patient advocacy led to the recent approval. The bench-to-bedside development of trofinetide underscores the value of collaboration between these groups in the development and approval of treatments for rare diseases.

Design and outcome measures of LAVENDER, a phase 3 study of trofinetide for Rett syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Rett syndrome (RTT) is a debilitating neurodevelopmental disorder with no approved treatments. Trofinetide is a synthetic analog of glycine-proline-glutamate, the N-terminal tripeptide of insulin-like growth factor 1. In a phase 2, placebo-controlled trial in 82 females with RTT aged 5-15 years, a significant (p ≤ 0.042) improvement over placebo was observed with the highest trofinetide dose (200 mg/kg twice daily [BID]) on three measures: Rett Syndrome Behaviour Questionnaire (RSBQ), Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I), and RTT-Clinician Domain Specific Concerns-Visual Analog Scale (RTT-DSC-VAS). Trofinetide was well tolerated at all doses (50, 100, and 200 mg/kg BID). A phase 3 trial utilizing disease-specific and novel scales was designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of trofinetide in girls and women with RTT. METHODS: This 12-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study (LAVENDER; NCT04181723) will evaluate trofinetide in 187 females, aged 5-20 years, with RTT. Co-primary endpoints are the RSBQ and CGI-I scales. Clinical domains of the CGI-I include communication, ambulation, hand use, seizures, attentiveness, and social (eye contact) and autonomic (breathing) aspects. Secondary endpoints will leverage four novel RTT-specific clinician ratings (derived from the RTT-DSC-VAS) of hand function, ambulation, ability to communicate, and verbal communication, and existing scales, to evaluate other core symptoms of RTT, quality of life and caregiver burden. A 40-week, open-label extension study will follow. DISCUSSION: This study was designed using disease-specific scales optimized to demonstrate changes in core symptoms of RTT and may provide the first phase 3 data demonstrating drug efficacy in individuals with RTT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.govNCT04181723.

A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Study of Trofinetide in the Treatment of Fragile X Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: We analyze the safety and tolerability of trofinetide and provide a preliminary evaluation of its efficacy in adolescent and adult males with fragile X syndrome. METHODS: This study was an exploratory, phase 2, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study of the safety and tolerability of orally administered trofinetide in 72 adolescent and adult males with fragile X syndrome. Subjects were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to 35 or 70 mg/kg twice daily trofinetide or placebo for 28 days. Safety assessments included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, electrocardiograms, physical examinations, and concomitant medications. Efficacy measurements were categorized into four efficacy domains, which related to clinically relevant phenotypic dimensions of impairment associated with fragile X syndrome. RESULTS: Both 35 and 70 mg/kg dose levels of trofinetide were well tolerated and appeared to be generally safe. Trofinetide at the 70 mg/kg dose level demonstrated efficacy compared with placebo based on prespecified criteria. On the basis of a permutation test, the probability of a false-positive outcome for the achieved prespecified success was 0.045. In the group analysis, improvement from treatment baseline was demonstrated on three fragile X syndrome-specific outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: Trofinetide was well tolerated in adolescent and adult males with fragile X syndrome. Despite the relatively short duration of the study, a consistent signal of efficacy at the higher dose was observed in both caregiver and clinician assessments, based on a novel analytical model incorporating evaluation of multiple key symptom areas of fragile X syndrome. This finding suggests a potential for trofinetide treatment to provide clinically meaningful improvement in core fragile X syndrome symptoms.