Insufficient Evidence for "Autism-Specific" Genes.

Despite evidence that deleterious variants in the same genes are implicated across multiple neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric disorders, there has been considerable interest in identifying genes that, when mutated, confer risk that is largely specific for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Here, we review the findings and limitations of recent efforts to identify relatively "autism-specific" genes, efforts which focus on rare variants of large effect size that are thought to account for the observed phenotypes. We present a divergent interpretation of published evidence; discuss practical and theoretical issues related to studying the relationships between rare, large-effect deleterious variants and neurodevelopmental phenotypes; and describe potential future directions of this research. We argue that there is currently insufficient evidence to establish meaningful ASD specificity of any genes based on large-effect rare-variant data.

Phenotypic shift in copy number variants: Evidence in 16p11.2 duplication syndrome.

PURPOSE: Recurrent 16p11.2 duplications produce a wide range of clinical outcomes with varying effects on cognition and social functioning. Family-based studies of copy number variants (CNVs) have revealed significant contributions of genomic background on variable expressivity. In this study, we measured the phenotypic effect of 16p11.2 duplications and quantified the modulating effect of familial background on cognitive and social outcomes. METHODS: Genomic and clinical data were ascertained from 41 probands with a 16p11.2 duplication and their first-degree relatives. Paired comparisons were completed to determine the duplication's effect on expected vs actual performance on standardized tests of intelligence (IQ) and social functioning (Social Responsiveness Scale-2). Intraclass correlations between relatives and probands were also calculated. RESULTS: Cognitive and social functioning were significantly lower among individuals with 16p11.2 duplications than their CNV-negative relatives, whereas intraclass correlations between the groups remained high for full-scale IQ and Social Responsiveness Scale-2 scores. CONCLUSION: The 16p11.2 duplication confers deleterious effects on cognition and social functioning, whereas familial background significantly influences phenotypic expression of these traits. Understanding variable expressivity in CNV disorders has implications for anticipatory clinical care, particularly for individuals who receive a genetic diagnosis at an early age, long before the full scope of manifestations becomes evident.

Association of Supernumerary Sex Chromosome Aneuploidies With Venous Thromboembolism.

Importance: An increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) has been reported in men with an additional sex chromosome. The association between other sex chromosome aneuploidies and VTE is not well characterized. Objective: To determine if sex chromosome aneuploidy is associated with VTE. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study of sex chromosome aneuploidy and VTE, performed by analyzing X- and Y-chromosome dosage and VTE incidence in 642 544 individuals from 2 population-scale biobanks: the US Geisinger MyCode Community Health Initiative (N = 154 519) and the UK Biobank (N = 488 025); analysis was limited to participants self-identified as White because of inadequate sample sizes for other race and ethnicity groups. A total of 108 461 unrelated MyCode participants with electronic health record follow-up ranging from September 1996 to December 2020 and 418 725 unrelated British and Irish UK Biobank participants who attended the baseline assessment between March 2006 and October 2010, with follow-up extending to November 2020, were included in analyses of VTE. Exposures: Sex chromosome aneuploidies. Main Outcomes and Measures: Individuals with 1 primary inpatient VTE diagnosis, 2 primary outpatient VTE diagnoses, or a self-reported VTE diagnosis were defined as VTE cases. P values were adjusted for multiple comparisons. Results: Identification of sex chromosome aneuploidy was undertaken among 642 544 individuals aged 18 to 90 years. Identification of a diagnosis of VTE was undertaken among 108 461 unrelated MyCode participants (65 565 [60.5%] female; mean age at last visit, 58.0 [SD, 17.6] years; median follow-up, 15.3 [IQR, 9.7] years) and among 418 725 unrelated UK Biobank participants (224 695 [53.7%] female; mean age at baseline interview, 56.9 [SD, 8.0] years; median follow-up, 12.0 [IQR, 1.6] years). Among MyCode participants, during 10 years of follow-up, 17 incident VTE events per 1353 person-years were detected among those with supernumerary sex chromosome aneuploidy (1.3% per person-year) compared with 2060 per 816 682 person-years among those with 46,XX or 46,XY (0.25% per person-year) (hazard ratio, 5.4 [95% CI, 3.4-8.7]; 10-year risk difference, 8.8% [95% CI, 4.2%-14.0%]; P < .001). Among UK Biobank participants, during 10 years of follow-up, 16 incident VTE events per 3803 person-years were detected among those with supernumerary sex chromosome aneuploidy (0.42% per person-year) compared with 4491 per 3 970 467 person-years among those with 46,XX or 46,XY (0.11% per person-year) (hazard ratio, 4.1 [95% CI, 2.5-6.7]; 10-year risk difference, 3.7% [95% CI, 1.4%-5.9%]; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Adults with supernumerary sex chromosome aneuploidies compared with 2 sex chromosomes had a small but statistically significant increased risk of VTE. Further research is needed to understand the clinical implications of this association.

Utilizing ClinGen gene-disease validity and dosage sensitivity curations to inform variant classification.

Understanding whether there is enough evidence to implicate a gene's role in a given disease, as well as the mechanisms by which variants in this gene might cause this disease, is essential to determine clinical relevance. The National Institutes of Health-funded Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) has developed evaluation frameworks to assess both the strength of evidence supporting a relationship between a gene and disease (gene-disease validity), and whether loss (haploinsufficiency) or gain (triplosensitivity) of individual genes or genomic regions is a mechanism for disease (dosage sensitivity). ClinGen actively applies these frameworks across multiple disease domains, and makes this information publicly available via its website (https://www.clinicalgenome.org/) for use in multiple applications, including clinical variant classification. Here, we describe how the results of these curation processes can be utilized to inform the appropriate application of pathogenicity criteria for both sequence and copy number variants, as well as to guide test development and inform genomic filtering pipelines.

Frequency of truncating FLCN variants and Birt-Hogg-Dubé-associated phenotypes in a health care system population.

PURPOSE: Penetrance estimates of Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome (BHD)-associated cutaneous, pulmonary, and kidney manifestations are based on clinically ascertained families. In a health care system population, we used a genetics-first approach to estimate the prevalence of pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) truncating variants in FLCN, which cause BHD, and the penetrance of BHD-related phenotypes. METHODS: Exomes from 135,990 patient-participants in Geisinger's MyCode cohort were assessed for P/LP truncating FLCN variants. BHD-related phenotypes were evaluated from electronic health records. Association between P/LP FLCN variants and BHD-related phenotypes was assessed using Firth's logistic regression. RESULTS: P/LP truncating FLCN variants were identified in 35 individuals (1 in 3234 unrelated individuals), 68.6% of whom had BHD-related phenotype(s), including cystic lung disease (65.7%), pneumothoraces (17.1%), cutaneous manifestations (8.6%), and kidney cancer (2.9%). A total of 4 (11.4%) individuals had prior clinical BHD diagnoses. CONCLUSION: In this health care population, the frequency of P/LP truncating FLCN variants is 60 times higher than the previously reported prevalence. Although most variant-positive individuals had BHD-related phenotypes, a minority were previously clinically diagnosed, likely because cutaneous manifestations, pneumothoraces, and kidney cancer were observed at lower frequencies than in clinical cohorts. Improved clinical recognition of cystic lung disease and education concerning its association with FLCN variants could prompt evaluation for BHD.

Medical manifestations and health care utilization among adult MyCode participants with neurodevelopmental psychiatric copy number variants.

PURPOSE: Recurrent pathogenic copy number variants (pCNVs) have large-effect impacts on brain function and represent important etiologies of neurodevelopmental psychiatric disorders (NPDs), including autism and schizophrenia. Patterns of health care utilization in adults with pCNVs have gone largely unstudied and are likely to differ in significant ways from those of children. METHODS: We compared the prevalence of NPDs and electronic health record-based medical conditions in 928 adults with 26 pCNVs to a demographically-matched cohort of pCNV-negative controls from >135,000 patient-participants in Geisinger's MyCode Community Health Initiative. We also evaluated 3 quantitative health care utilization measures (outpatient, inpatient, and emergency department visits) in both groups. RESULTS: Adults with pCNVs (24.9%) were more likely than controls (16.0%) to have a documented NPD. They had significantly higher rates of several chronic diseases, including diabetes (29.3% in participants with pCNVs vs 20.4% in participants without pCNVs) and dementia (2.2% in participants with pCNVs vs 1.0% participants without pCNVs), and twice as many annual emergency department visits. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the potential for genetic information-specifically, pCNVs-to inform the study of health care outcomes and utilization in adults. If, as our findings suggest, adults with pCNVs have poorer health and require disproportionate health care resources, early genetic diagnosis paired with patient-centered interventions may help to anticipate problems, improve outcomes, and reduce the associated economic burden.

Clinical validity assessment of genes frequently tested on intellectual disability/autism sequencing panels.

PURPOSE: Neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), such as intellectual disability (ID) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD), exhibit genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity, making them difficult to differentiate without a molecular diagnosis. The Clinical Genome Resource Intellectual Disability/Autism Gene Curation Expert Panel (GCEP) uses systematic curation to distinguish ID/ASD genes that are appropriate for clinical testing (ie, with substantial evidence supporting their relationship to disease) from those that are not. METHODS: Using the Clinical Genome Resource gene-disease validity curation framework, the ID/Autism GCEP classified genes frequently included on clinical ID/ASD testing panels as Definitive, Strong, Moderate, Limited, Disputed, Refuted, or No Known Disease Relationship. RESULTS: As of September 2021, 156 gene-disease pairs have been evaluated. Although most (75%) were determined to have definitive roles in NDDs, 22 (14%) genes evaluated had either Limited or Disputed evidence. Such genes are currently not recommended for use in clinical testing owing to the limited ability to assess the effect of identified variants. CONCLUSION: Our understanding of gene-disease relationships evolves over time; new relationships are discovered and previously-held conclusions may be questioned. Without periodic re-examination, inaccurate gene-disease claims may be perpetuated. The ID/Autism GCEP will continue to evaluate these claims to improve diagnosis and clinical care for NDDs.

Recontacting registry participants with genetic updates through GenomeConnect, the ClinGen patient registry.

PURPOSE: Variant classifications and gene-disease relationships may evolve. Professional societies have suggested patients share the responsibility to remain up-to-date on the implications genetic results have on their health, and that novel methods of recontact are needed. GenomeConnect, the ClinGen patient registry, has implemented a process to provide variant classification and gene-disease relationship updates to participants. Here, we report on our experience with this recontacting process. METHODS: GenomeConnect shares data with ClinVar and Matchmaker Exchange enabling the identification of updates to variant classifications and gene-disease relationships. For any updates identified, the reporting laboratory is contacted, and updates are shared with participants opting to receive them. RESULTS: Of 1,419 variants shared with ClinVar by GenomeConnect, 49 (3.4%) variant reclassifications were identified and 34 were shared with participants. Of 97 candidate genes submitted to Matchmaker Exchange, 10 (10.3%) gene-disease relationships have been confirmed and 9 were shared with participants. Details available from a subset of participants highlight that updated information is not always shared with the patient by testing laboratories. CONCLUSION: Patient registries can provide a mechanism for patients and their providers to remain informed about changes to the interpretation and clinical significance of their genetic results, leading to important implications for care.

Loss of δ-catenin function in severe autism.

Autism is a multifactorial neurodevelopmental disorder affecting more males than females; consequently, under a multifactorial genetic hypothesis, females are affected only when they cross a higher biological threshold. We hypothesize that deleterious variants at conserved residues are enriched in severely affected patients arising from female-enriched multiplex families with severe disease, enhancing the detection of key autism genes in modest numbers of cases. Here we show the use of this strategy by identifying missense and dosage sequence variants in the gene encoding the adhesive junction-associated δ-catenin protein (CTNND2) in female-enriched multiplex families and demonstrating their loss-of-function effect by functional analyses in zebrafish embryos and cultured hippocampal neurons from wild-type and Ctnnd2 null mouse embryos. Finally, through gene expression and network analyses, we highlight a critical role for CTNND2 in neuronal development and an intimate connection to chromatin biology. Our data contribute to the understanding of the genetic architecture of autism and suggest that genetic analyses of phenotypic extremes, such as female-enriched multiplex families, are of innate value in multifactorial disorders.

Variant interpretation is a component of clinical practice among genetic counselors in multiple specialties.

PURPOSE: Genomic testing is routinely utilized across clinical settings and can have significant variant interpretation challenges. The extent of genetic counselor (GC) engagement in variant interpretation in clinical practice is unknown. This study aimed to explore clinical GCs' variant interpretation practice across specialties, understand outcomes of this practice, and identify resource and educational needs. METHODS: An online survey was administered to National Society of Genetic Counselors members providing clinical counseling. RESULTS: Respondents (n = 239) represented all major clinical specialties. The majority (68%) reported reviewing evidence documented by the laboratory for most (>60%) variants reported; 45.5% report seeking additional evidence. Prenatal GCs were less likely to independently assess reported evidence. Most respondents (67%) report having reached a different conclusion about a variant's classification than the testing laboratory, though infrequently. Time was the most commonly reported barrier (72%) to performing variant interpretation, though the majority (97%) indicated that this practice had an important impact on patient care. When presented with three hypothetical scenarios, evidence typically used for variant interpretation was generally applied correctly. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to document variant interpretation practice broadly across clinical GC specialties. Our results suggest that variant interpretation should be considered a practice-based competency for GCs.

Technical standards for the interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen).

PURPOSE: Copy-number analysis to detect disease-causing losses and gains across the genome is recommended for the evaluation of individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders and/or multiple congenital anomalies, as well as for fetuses with ultrasound abnormalities. In the decade that this analysis has been in widespread clinical use, tremendous strides have been made in understanding the effects of copy-number variants (CNVs) in both affected individuals and the general population. However, continued broad implementation of array and next-generation sequencing-based technologies will expand the types of CNVs encountered in the clinical setting, as well as our understanding of their impact on human health. METHODS: To assist clinical laboratories in the classification and reporting of CNVs, irrespective of the technology used to identify them, the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics has developed the following professional standards in collaboration with the National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) project. RESULTS: This update introduces a quantitative, evidence-based scoring framework; encourages the implementation of the five-tier classification system widely used in sequence variant classification; and recommends "uncoupling" the evidence-based classification of a variant from its potential implications for a particular individual. CONCLUSION: These professional standards will guide the evaluation of constitutional CNVs and encourage consistency and transparency across clinical laboratories.

Rare Inherited and De Novo CNVs Reveal Complex Contributions to ASD Risk in Multiplex Families.

Rare mutations, including copy-number variants (CNVs), contribute significantly to autism spectrum disorder (ASD) risk. Although their importance has been established in families with only one affected child (simplex families), the contribution of both de novo and inherited CNVs to ASD in families with multiple affected individuals (multiplex families) is less well understood. We analyzed 1,532 families from the Autism Genetic Resource Exchange (AGRE) to assess the impact of de novo and rare CNVs on ASD risk in multiplex families. We observed a higher burden of large, rare CNVs, including inherited events, in individuals with ASD than in their unaffected siblings (odds ratio [OR] = 1.7), but the rate of de novo events was significantly lower than in simplex families. In previously characterized ASD risk loci, we identified 49 CNVs, comprising 24 inherited events, 19 de novo events, and 6 events of unknown inheritance, a significant enrichment in affected versus control individuals (OR = 3.3). In 21 of the 30 families (71%) in whom at least one affected sibling harbored an established ASD major risk CNV, including five families harboring inherited CNVs, the CNV was not shared by all affected siblings, indicating that other risk factors are contributing. We also identified a rare risk locus for ASD and language delay at chromosomal region 2q24 (implicating NR4A2) and another lower-penetrance locus involving inherited deletions and duplications of WWOX. The genetic architecture in multiplex families differs from that in simplex families and is complex, warranting more complete genetic characterization of larger multiplex ASD cohorts.

Development of a consent resource for genomic data sharing in the clinical setting.

PURPOSE: Data sharing between clinicians, laboratories, and patients is essential for improvements in genomic medicine, but obtaining consent for individual-level data sharing is often hindered by a lack of time and resources. To address this issue, the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) developed tools to facilitate consent, including a one-page consent form and online supplemental video with information on key topics, such as risks and benefits of data sharing. METHODS: To determine whether the consent form and video accurately conveyed key data sharing concepts, we surveyed 5,162 members of the general public. We measured comprehension at baseline, after reading the form and watching the video. Additionally, we assessed participants' attitudes toward genomic data sharing. RESULTS: Participants' performance on comprehension questions significantly improved over baseline after reading the form and continued to improve after watching the video. CONCLUSION: Results suggest reading the form alone provided participants with important knowledge regarding broad data sharing, and watching the video allowed for broader comprehension. These materials are now available at http://www.clinicalgenome.org/share . These resources will provide patients a straightforward way to share their genetic and health information, and improve the scientific community's access to data generated through routine healthcare.

The value of genomic variant ClinVar submissions from clinical providers: Beyond the addition of novel variants.

With the increasing use of clinical genomic testing across broad medical disciplines, the need for data sharing and curation efforts to improve variant interpretation is paramount. The National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) ClinVar database facilitates these efforts by serving as a repository for clinical assertions about genomic variants and associations with disease. Most variant submissions are from clinical laboratories, which may lack clinical details. Laboratories may also choose not to submit all variants. Clinical providers can contribute to variant interpretation improvements by submitting variants to ClinVar with their own assertions and supporting evidence. The medical genetics team at Geisinger's Autism & Developmental Medicine Institute routinely reviews the clinical significance of all variants obtained through clinical genomic testing, using published ACMG/AMP guidelines, clinical correlation, and post-test clinical data. We describe the submission of 148 sequence and 155 copy number variants to ClinVar as "provider interpretations." Of these, 192 (63.4%) were novel to ClinVar. Detailed clinical data were provided for 298 (98.3%), and when available, segregation data and follow-up clinical correlation or testing was included. This contribution marks the first large-scale submission from a neurodevelopmental clinical setting and illustrates the importance of clinical providers in collaborative efforts to improve variant interpretation.

ClinGen's GenomeConnect registry enables patient-centered data sharing.

GenomeConnect, the NIH-funded Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) patient registry, engages patients in data sharing to support the goal of creating a genomic knowledge base to inform clinical care and research. Participant self-reported health information and genomic variants from genetic testing reports are curated and shared with public databases, such as ClinVar. There are four primary benefits of GenomeConnect: (1) sharing novel genomic data-47.9% of variants were new to ClinVar, highlighting patients as a genomic data source; (2) contributing additional phenotypic information-of the 52.1% of variants already in ClinVar, GenomeConnect provided enhanced case-level data; (3) providing a way for patients to receive variant classification updates if the reporting laboratory submits to ClinVar-97.3% of responding participants opted to receive such information and 13 updates have been identified; and (4) supporting connections with others, including other participants, clinicians, and researchers to enable the exchange of information and support-60.4% of participants have opted to partake in participant matching. Moving forward, ClinGen plans to increase patient-centric data sharing by partnering with other existing patient groups. By engaging patients, more information is contributed to the public knowledge base, benefiting both patients and the genomics community.

Evidence-based assessments of clinical actionability in the context of secondary findings: Updates from ClinGen's Actionability Working Group.

The use of genome-scale sequencing allows for identification of genetic findings beyond the original indication for testing (secondary findings). The ClinGen Actionability Working Group's (AWG) protocol for evidence synthesis and semi-quantitative metric scoring evaluates four domains of clinical actionability for potential secondary findings: severity and likelihood of the outcome, and effectiveness and nature of the intervention. As of February 2018, the AWG has scored 127 genes associated with 78 disorders (up-to-date topics/scores are available at www.clinicalgenome.org). Scores across these disorders were assessed to compare genes/disorders recommended for return as secondary findings by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) with those not currently recommended. Disorders recommended by the ACMG scored higher on outcome-related domains (severity and likelihood), but not on intervention-related domains (effectiveness and nature of the intervention). Current practices indicate that return of secondary findings will expand beyond those currently recommended by the ACMG. The ClinGen AWG evidence reports and summary scores are not intended as classifications of actionability, rather they provide a resource to aid decision makers as they determine best practices regarding secondary findings. The ClinGen AWG is working with the ACMG Secondary Findings Committee to update future iterations of their secondary findings list.

Detection of Chromosomal Aberrations in Clinical Practice: From Karyotype to Genome Sequence.

Since the inception of clinical cytogenetics in the late 1950s, the field has witnessed the evolution of multiple methodologies for the evaluation of chromosomal imbalances and rearrangements. From the replacement of solidly stained chromosomes by Giemsa banding (G-banding) to in situ hybridization and microarrays, each technique has sought to detect smaller and smaller chromosomal aberrations across the genome. Microarray analysis has revealed that copy-number variants-a class of mutation resulting from the loss (deletion) or gain (duplication) of genomic material that is >1 kb in size-are among the significant contributors to human disease and normal variation. Here, we evaluate the history and utility of various methodologies and their impact on the current practice of clinical cytogenetics.

ClinGen--the Clinical Genome Resource.

On autopsy, a patient is found to have hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. The patient's family pursues genetic testing that shows a "likely pathogenic" variant for the condition on the basis of a study in an original research publication. Given the dominant inheritance of the condition and the risk of sudden cardiac death, other family members are tested for the genetic variant to determine their risk. Several family members test negative and are told that they are not at risk for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and sudden cardiac death, and those who test positive are told that they need to be regularly monitored for cardiomyopathy on echocardiography. Five years later, during a routine clinic visit of one of the genotype-positive family members, the cardiologist queries a database for current knowledge on the genetic variant and discovers that the variant is now interpreted as "likely benign" by another laboratory that uses more recently derived population-frequency data. A newly available testing panel for additional genes that are implicated in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is initiated on an affected family member, and a different variant is found that is determined to be pathogenic. Family members are retested, and one member who previously tested negative is now found to be positive for this new variant. An immediate clinical workup detects evidence of cardiomyopathy, and an intracardiac defibrillator is implanted to reduce the risk of sudden cardiac death.

Yield of additional genetic testing after chromosomal microarray for diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disability and congenital anomalies: a clinical practice resource of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).

PURPOSE: Chromosomal microarray (CMA) is recommended as the first-tier test in evaluation of individuals with neurodevelopmental disability and congenital anomalies. CMA may not detect balanced cytogenomic abnormalities or uniparental disomy (UPD), and deletion/duplications and regions of homozygosity may require additional testing to clarify the mechanism and inform accurate counseling. We conducted an evidence review to synthesize data regarding the benefit of additional testing after CMA to inform a genetic diagnosis. METHODS: The review was guided by key questions related to the detection of genomic events that may require additional testing. A PubMed search for original research articles, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses was evaluated from articles published between 1 January 1983 and 31 March 2017. Based on the key questions, articles were retrieved and data extracted in parallel with comparison of results and discussion to resolve discrepancies. Variables assessed included study design and outcomes. RESULTS: A narrative synthesis was created for each question to describe the occurrence of, and clinical significance of, additional diagnostic findings from subsequent testing performed after CMA. CONCLUSION: These findings may be used to assist the laboratory and clinician when making recommendations about additional testing after CMA, as it impacts clinical care, counseling, and diagnosis.