Ecological validity of cognitive fluctuations in dementia with Lewy bodies.

OBJECTIVES: Cognitive fluctuations are a core clinical feature of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), but their contribution to the everyday functioning difficulties evident DLB are not well understood. The current study evaluated whether intraindividual variability across a battery of neurocognitive tests (intraindividual variability-dispersion) and daily cognitive fluctuations as measured by informant report are associated with worse daily functioning in DLB. METHODS: The study sample included 97 participants with consensus-defined DLB from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC). Intraindividual variability-dispersion was measured using the coefficient of variation, which divides the standard deviation of an individual's performance scores across 12 normed neurocognitive indices from the NACC neuropsychological battery by that individual's performance mean. Informants reported on daily cognitive fluctuations using the Mayo Fluctuations Scale (MFS) and on daily functioning using the functional activities questionnaire (FAQ). RESULTS: Logistic regression identified a large univariate association of intraindividual variability-dispersion and presence of daily cognitive fluctuations on the MFS (Odds Ratio = 73.27, 95% Confidence Interval = 1.38, 3,895.05). Multiple linear regression demonstrated that higher intraindividual variability-dispersion and presence of daily cognitive fluctuations as assessed by the MFS were significantly and independently related to worse daily functioning (FAQ scores). CONCLUSIONS: Among those with DLB, informant-rated daily cognitive fluctuations and cognitive fluctuations measured in the clinic (as indexed by intraindividual variability-dispersion across a battery of tests) were independently associated with poorer everyday functioning. These data demonstrate ecological validity in measures of cognitive fluctuations in DLB.

Does Social Support Play a Role in the Expression and Everyday Functioning Impact of Apathy in HIV Disease?

Clinically notable apathy occurs in approximately one-third of persons living with HIV (PLWH). Drawing from psychological theory, this cross-sectional study examined the interplay between apathy and social support in persons with (n = 143) and without (n = 61) HIV disease. Analyses were conducted using multiple regression and mediation procedures with 95th percentile bootstrap confidence intervals. Positive HIV serostatus and lower social support were associated with more frequent apathy, independent of other mood symptoms. Social support did not moderate apathy's associations with everyday functioning among PLWH, but post hoc analyses revealed that apathy mediated the relationship between social support and everyday functioning among PLWH. Stronger social support may provide a buffer against the frequency of apathy symptoms in persons with and without HIV disease. The relationship between lower social support and poorer everyday functioning in HIV might be partly explained by apathy. Longitudinal research is needed to examine the mechanisms of these relationships.

RESUMEN: La apatía clínicamente notable se produce en aproximadamente un tercio de las personas que viven con el VIH (PVVS). A partir de la teoría psicológica, este estudio transversal examinó la interacción entre la apatía y el apoyo social en personas con (n = 143) y sin (n = 61) enfermedad de VIH. Los análisis se llevaron utilizando procedimientos de regresión múltiple y mediación con intervalos de confianza bootstrap del 95º percentil. El estado serológico positivo respecto al VIH y un menor apoyo social se asociaron con una apatía más frecuente, independientemente de otros síntomas del estado de ánimo. El apoyo social no moderó las asociaciones de la apatía con el funcionamiento cotidiano entre las PVVS, pero los análisis post hoc revelaron que la apatía mediaba la relación entre el apoyo social y el funcionamiento cotidiano entre las PVVS. Un apoyo social más fuerte puede atenuar la frecuencia de los síntomas de apatía en personas con y sin VIH. La relación entre un menor apoyo social y un peor funcionamiento cotidiano en personas con VIH podría explicarse en parte por la apatía. Se necesitan investigaciones longitudinales para examinar los mecanismos de estas relaciones.

Cognitive Intra-individual Variability in the Laboratory Is Associated With Greater Executive Dysfunction in the Daily Lives of Older Adults With HIV.

BACKGROUND: Executive dysfunction, which is common among persons with HIV (PWH), can have an adverse impact on health behaviors and quality of life. Intra-individual variability (IIV) is a measure of within-person variability across cognitive tests that is higher in PWH and is thought to reflect cognitive dyscontrol. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether cognitive IIV in the laboratory is associated with self-reported executive dysfunction in daily life among older PWH. METHOD: Participants included 71 PWH aged ≥50 years who completed six subtests from the Cogstate battery and two subscales from the Frontal Systems Behavior Scale (FrSBe; self-report version). Cognitive IIV was calculated from the Cogstate as the coefficient of variation derived from age-adjusted normative T scores. RESULTS: Cognitive IIV as measured by the Cogstate showed a significant, positive, medium-sized association with current FrSBe ratings of executive dysfunction but not disinhibition. CONCLUSION: Higher cognitive IIV in the laboratory as measured by the Cogstate may be related to the expression of HIV-associated symptoms of executive dysfunction in daily life for older PWH.

Combined effects of older age and HIV disease on changes in everyday functioning over one year.

Older age and HIV disease are independent risk factors for problems in many aspects of everyday functioning. However, less is known about how these risk factors may combine to influence everyday functioning over time. The current study examined the possible combined effects of age and HIV serostatus on change in everyday functioning over a 1-year period and its specific associations with changes in neurocognition. A repeated measures factorial design was employed. Participants included 77 older persons with HIV (PWH), 35 younger PWH, 44 older HIV-, and 27 younger HIV-adults who each completed baseline and follow-up visits approximately 14 months apart. Everyday functioning was assessed using a standardized self-report measure of activities of daily living (ADLs) at each visit. A comprehensive clinical battery assessed six domains of neurocognition. Raw scores on each neurocognitive measure were converted to sample-based z-scores, from which a global neurocognitive z-score was derived. Older PWH reported the poorest everyday functioning at baseline and follow-up visits at medium-to-large effect sizes. However, these ADL disruptions among older PWH were relatively stable over time, differing significantly from younger PWH who evidenced mild ADL improvements from baseline to follow-up. Within the entire sample, everyday functioning at baseline predicted neurocognitive performance at follow-up, but the reciprocal relationship was not significant. Older adults with HIV have high rates of ADL problems, which appear stable over 1 year, the trajectory of which differed from younger adults with HIV for whom mild improvements were observed. Importantly, the results also suggest that problems with ADLs may sometimes precede neurocognitive declines. Further examination of longitudinal data is needed to elucidate the long-term trajectory of neurocognitive and functional changes in older PWH to support early detection and proper management of clinical care.

Victoria Symptom Validity Test: A Systematic Review and Cross-Validation Study.

The Victoria Symptom Validity Test (VSVT) is a performance validity test (PVT) with over two decades of empirical backing, although methodological limitations within the extant literature restrict its clinical and research generalizability. Chief among these constraints includes limited consensus on the most accurate index within the VSVT and the most appropriate cut-scores within each VSVT validity index. The current systematic review synthesizes existing VSVT validation studies and provides additional cross-validation in an independent sample using a known-groups design. We completed a systematic search of the literature, identifying 17 peer-reviewed studies for synthesis (7 simulation designs, 7 differential prevalence designs, and 3 known-groups designs). The independent cross-validation sample consisted of 200 mixed clinical neuropsychiatric patients referred for outpatient neuropsychological evaluation. Across all indices, Total item accuracy produced the strongest psychometric properties at an optimal cut-score of ≤ 40 (62% sensitivity/88% specificity). However, ROC curve analyses for all VSVT indices yielded statistically significant areas under the curve (AUCs; .73-81), suggestive of moderate classification accuracy. Cut-scores derived using the independent cross-validation sample converged with some previous findings supporting cut-scores of ≤ 22 for Easy item accuracy and ≤ 40 for Total item accuracy, although divergent findings were noted for Difficult item accuracy. Overall, VSVT validity indicators have adequate diagnostic accuracy across populations, with the current study providing additional support for its use as a psychometrically sound PVT in clinical settings. However, caution is recommended among patients with certain verified clinical conditions (e.g., dementia) and those with pronounced working memory deficits due to concerns for increased risk of false positives.

Clinical identification of psychogenic nonepileptic events using combinations of psychological tests in a veteran sample.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with psychogenic nonepileptic events (PNEE) exhibit heterogenous symptoms and are best diagnosed with long-term video-electroencephalogram (vEEG) data. While extensive univariate data suggest psychological tests may confirm the etiology of PNEE, the multivariate discriminant utility of psychological tests is less clear. The current study aggregated likelihood ratios of multiple psychological tests to evaluate incremental and discriminant utility for PNEE. METHODS: Veterans with vEEG-diagnosed PNEE (n = 166) or epileptic seizures (n = 92) completed self-report measures and brief neuropsychological evaluations during the 4-day vEEG hospitalization. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves identified discriminating psychological tests and corresponding cut-scores (0.85 minimum specificity). Likelihood ratios from the remaining cut-scores were sequentially linked using the sample base rate of PNEE (64%) and alternative base rates (10%, 20%, 30%, 40%) to estimate posttest probabilities (PTP) of test combinations. RESULTS: The Health Attitudes Survey, Health History Checklist, and Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form scales FBS-r, RC1, MLS, and NUC were identified as discriminating indicators of PNEE. Average PTPs were ≥90% when three or more indicators out of six administered were present at the sample base rate. Regardless of PNEE base rate, PTP for PNEE was ≥98% when all discriminating indicators were present and 92-99% when five of six indicators administered were present. PTPs were largely consistent with observed positive predictive values, particularly as indicators present increased. SIGNIFICANCE: Aggregating psychological tests identified PNEE with a high degree of accuracy, regardless of PNEE base rate. Combining psychological tests may be useful for confirming the etiology of PNEE.

The Uniform Dataset 3.0 Neuropsychological Battery: Factor Structure, Invariance Testing, and Demographically Adjusted Factor Score Calculation.

OBJECTIVE: The goals of this study were to (1) specify the factor structure of the Uniform Dataset 3.0 neuropsychological battery (UDS3NB) in cognitively unimpaired older adults, (2) establish measurement invariance for this model, and (3) create a normative calculator for factor scores. METHODS: Data from 2520 cognitively intact older adults were submitted to confirmatory factor analyses and invariance testing across sex, age, and education. Additionally, a subsample of this dataset was used to examine invariance over time using 1-year follow-up data (n = 1061). With the establishment of metric invariance of the UDS3NB measures, factor scores could be extracted uniformly for the entire normative sample. Finally, a calculator was created for deriving demographically adjusted factor scores. RESULTS: A higher order model of cognition yielded the best fit to the data χ2(47) = 385.18, p < .001, comparative fit index = .962, Tucker-Lewis Index = .947, root mean square error of approximation = .054, and standardized root mean residual = .036. This model included a higher order general cognitive abilities factor, as well as lower order processing speed/executive, visual, attention, language, and memory factors. Age, sex, and education were significantly associated with factor score performance, evidencing a need for demographic correction when interpreting factor scores. A user-friendly Excel calculator was created to accomplish this goal and is available in the online supplementary materials. CONCLUSIONS: The UDS3NB is best characterized by a higher order factor structure. Factor scores demonstrate at least metric invariance across time and demographic groups. Methods for calculating these factors scores are provided.

Self-perceived cognitive fluctuations and their relationship to everyday functioning in older adults with and without HIV disease.

Objective: HIV is associated with elevated performance-based cognitive intra-individual variability (IIV) in the laboratory that can reflect difficulty regulating cognitive resources over time (i.e., cognitive fluctuations) and disrupt everyday functioning. Whether persons living with HIV (PLWH) experience appreciable cognitive fluctuations in their daily lives is unclear. This study examined the presence of cognitive fluctuations and their relationship to everyday functioning in PLWH. Methods: Participants were 145 PLWH and 61 seronegative individuals age ≥ 50 years who completed a self-report version of the Mayo Fluctuations Scale (MFS), structured psychiatric interview, medical evaluation, and well-validated measures of mood, cognitive symptoms, and activities of daily living (ADLs). A confirmatory factor analysis of the MFS yielded three factors, including a 7-item cognitive fluctuations scale. Results: Univariable analyses showed that HIV was associated with moderately higher MFS Cognitive Fluctuation subscale scores (d = 0.46), but this effect was no longer significant a multiple regression model that included medical comorbidities and affective disorders, which emerged as unique predictors. Of clinical relevance, higher MFS Cognitive Fluctuation subscale scores were independently associated with more frequent cognitive symptoms and dependence in ADLs in the full sample. Conclusions: Higher frequency of self-perceived cognitive fluctuations disrupts management of ADLs among middle-aged and older adults independent of HIV status and general cognitive symptoms. Future studies are needed to understand the full clinical significance of self-perceived cognitive fluctuations among PLWH and their impact on daily life.

A Comprehensive Examination of Clinical Characteristics and Determinants of Long-Term Outcomes in Pediatric Cerebral Sinus Venous Thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: To analyze the clinical and neuroimaging features, risk factors, treatment choices, and long-term clinical outcomes in children with cerebral sinus venous thrombosis (CSVT). METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of children diagnosed with CSVT between 2002 and 2018 at Texas Children's Hospital. RESULTS: A total of 183 children (male: 62.3%) with CSVT were included. The average presenting age was 7.7 years (S.D.: 5.6). The mean follow-up duration was 33.7 months (S.D.: 38.6). The most common presenting clinical feature was headache (36.6%). Head and neck infections other than meningitis (36.6%) were the most common risk factors. Prevalent neurological examination findings included motor deficit (21.3%) and altered mental status (AMS, 20.2%). Neuroimaging features included hemorrhagic infarction (19.6%), ischemic infarction (8.2%), and intracranial hemorrhage without infarction (5.5%). The most common site of thrombosis was the superior sagittal sinus (37.2%), with 78.2% of patients demonstrating involvement of multiple sinuses. Treatment of choice was low-molecular-weight heparin in 69.4% of patients. Factors associated with worse clinical outcomes included head and neck infections, malignancy (other than hematologic), cardiac disease, and recent surgery; seizure and dehydration on initial presentation; motor abnormalities and AMS on initial examination; ischemic infarct only; and involvement of vein of Trolard on neuroimaging. Thrombus condition on repeat imaging, receiving any anticoagulant/antithrombotic treatment, treatment duration, or follow-up duration was not associated with severity of long-term outcome. CONCLUSIONS: CSVT may lead to unfavorable long-term outcomes in a remarkable portion of pediatric patients. Thus, a high index of suspicion and early and appropriate management of pediatric CSVT is imperative.

Development and Validity of Norms for Cognitive Dispersion on the Uniform Data Set 3.0 Neuropsychological Battery.

OBJECTIVE: Cognitive dispersion indexes intraindividual variability in performance across a battery of neuropsychological tests. Measures of dispersion show promise as markers of cognitive dyscontrol and everyday functioning difficulties; however, they have limited practical applicability due to a lack of normative data. This study aimed to develop and evaluate normed scores for cognitive dispersion among older adults. METHOD: We analyzed data from 4,283 cognitively normal participants aged ≥50 years from the Uniform Data Set (UDS) 3.0. We describe methods for calculating intraindividual standard deviation (ISD) and coefficient of variation (CoV), as well as associated unadjusted scaled scores and demographically adjusted z-scores. We also examined the ability of ISD and CoV scores to differentiate between cognitively normal individuals (n = 4,283) and those with cognitive impairment due to Lewy body disease (n = 282). RESULTS: We generated normative tables to map raw ISD and CoV scores onto a normal distribution of scaled scores. Cognitive dispersion indices were associated with age, education, and race/ethnicity but not sex. Regression equations were used to develop a freely accessible Excel calculator for deriving demographically adjusted normed scores for ISD and CoV. All measures of dispersion demonstrated excellent diagnostic utility when evaluated by the area under the curve produced from receiver operating characteristic curves. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study provide evidence for the clinical utility of sample-based and demographically adjusted normative standards for cognitive dispersion on the UDS 3.0. These standards can be used to guide interpretation of intraindividual variability among older adults in clinical and research settings.

Development of the Telephone-based Daily Instrumental Activities of Living (T-DIAL) to assess financial management remotely in older adults.

The current study evaluated the reliability and validity of a novel, performance-based banking task in 60 younger (18-34 years) and 60 older (50-85 years) adults. All participants completed the Telephone-based Daily Instrumental Activities of Living (T-DIAL) using interactive voice response technology to complete a series of mock actions with a financial institution via telephone. The T-DIAL showed strong inter-rater reliability and internal consistency. T-DIAL accuracy was significantly and independently related to better self-reported instrumental activities of daily living and executive functions at a large effect size. Findings from this study provided preliminary supportive evidence for the reliability and validity of the T-DIAL, which had robust associations with manifest everyday functioning and higher-order cognitive ability. Future work is needed on the psychometrics (e.g. test-retest reliability, normative standards), and construct validity (e.g. diagnostic accuracy) of the T-DIAL in neurocognitive disorders and under-served communities for whom remote evaluations might be particularly relevant.

Embedded cognitive and emotional/affective self-reported symptom validity indices on the patient competency rating scale.

OBJECTIVE: Although there is an abundance of research on stand-alone and embedded performance validity tests and stand-alone symptom validity tests (SVTs), less emphasis has been placed on embedded SVTs. The goal of the current study was to examine the ability of embedded indicators within the Patient Competency Rating Scale (PCRS) to separately detect invalid cognitive and/or emotional/affective symptom responding. METHOD: Participants included 299 veterans assessed in a VA medical center epilepsy monitoring unit from 2013-2017 (mean age = 48.8 years, SD = 13.5 years). Two SVT composites were created; self-reported cognitive symptom validity (SVT-C) and self-reported emotional/affective symptom validity (SVT-E). Groups were compared on PCRS total and index scores (i.e., cognitive, activities of daily living, emotional, and interpersonal competencies) using ANOVAs. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses assessed the classification accuracy of the PCRS total and index scores for SVT-C and SVT-E. RESULTS: In ANOVAs, SVT-C was significantly associated with all PCRS indices, while SVT-E was only significantly associated with the PCRS total, emotional, and interpersonal competency indices. Although the PCRS-T ≤ 90 had the strongest classification of SVT-C and SVT-E (specificities: .90, sensitivities: .44 to .50), PCRS index scores showed suggestive evidence of domain specificity, with PCRS-ADL ≤22, PCRS-C ≤ 20, and PCRS-CADL ≤45 best classifying SVT-C (specificities: .92, sensitivities: .33) and the PCRS-E ≤ 18 best classifying the SVT-E group (specificity: .93, sensitivity: .40). CONCLUSION: Results suggest the PCRS may be used to obtain clinically useful information while including embedded indicators that can assess cognitive and/or emotional/affective symptom invalidity.

Dispersion-based cognitive intra-individual variability in dementia with Lewy bodies.

OBJECTIVE: Cognitive fluctuations are characteristic of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) but challenging to measure. Dispersion-based intra-individual variability (IIV-d) captures neurocognitive performance fluctuations across a test battery and may be sensitive to cognitive fluctuations but has not been studied in DLB. METHOD: We report on 5,976 participants that completed the uniform data set 3.0 neuropsychological battery (UDS3NB). IIV-d was calculated via the intra-individual standard deviation across 12 primary UDS3NB indicators. Separate models using mean USD3NB score and the Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) total score tested the reproducibility of the incremental value of IIV-d over-and-above global cognition. Binary logistic regressions tested whether IIV-d could classify individuals with and without clinician-rated cognitive fluctuations. Multinomial logistic regressions tested whether IIV-d could differentiate participants with DLB, participants with Alzheimer's disease (AD), and participants with healthy cognition (CH), as well as the incremental diagnostic utility of IIV-d over-and-above clinician-rated cognitive fluctuations. RESULTS: IIV-d exhibited large univariate associations with clinician-rated and non-clinician-informant reported cognitive fluctuations, which persisted when adjusting for MoCA but not the full battery mean. Of diagnostic relevance, greater IIV-d was consistently associated with DLB and AD relative to CH over-and-above global cognition and clinician-rated cognitive fluctuations. Greater IIV-d was less consistently associated with an increased probability of DLB relative to AD when controlling for global cognition. CONCLUSIONS: IIV-d accurately differentiates DLB from CH over-and-above global cognition and clinician-rated cognitive fluctuations. IIV-d may supplement a thorough clinical interview of cognitive fluctuations and serve as a standardized performance-based indicator of this transdiagnostic phenomenon. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Validity of informant report interpretations: Role of examinee performance and symptom invalidity.

Performance validity tests (PVTs) and symptom validity tests (SVTs) detect inaccuracies in examinee-completed measures, though methods for assessing the accuracy of informant reports-which may be inaccurate due to examinee deception, motivation for external incentives (e.g., disability payments), or attempts to validate examinee experiences-remain underexplored. We used a sample of 72 veteran-informant dyads undergoing evaluation of possible epilepsy-related neurocognitive disorder to assess the association between examinee response invalidity (i.e., performance and/or symptom invalidity) and informant report measures. Examinees completed PVTs, SVTs, cognitive, and self-report measures. Informants completed measures on examinee functioning and their own caregiver burden. Performance invalidity was defined as failure on two or more PVTs. Symptom invalidity for psychopathology symptom reports (SVT-P) and cognitive/somatic symptom reports (SVT-CS) were separately defined via above-threshold scores on two or more SVT criterion. Independent samples t tests demonstrated the associations of the PVT, SVT-CS, and SVT-P groups with informant-report measures. Informants for examinees with performance invalidity reported worse functioning in the examinee than informants for examinees in the valid performance group (medium-large effect sizes). Symptom validity status (for both SVT-CS and SVT-P) was meaningfully but less strongly related to informant-reported examinee functioning (small-medium effect sizes). Neither performance nor symptom invalidity was meaningfully related to informant-reported caregiver burden (negligible effect sizes). Informant reports for examinees with response invalidity should be interpreted with caution. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

When Time is of the Essence: Preliminary Findings for a Quick Administration of the Dot Counting Test.

OBJECTIVE: Performance validity research has emphasized the need for briefer measures and, more recently, abbreviated versions of established free-standing tests to minimize neuropsychological evaluation costs/time burden. This study examined the accuracy of multiple abbreviated versions of the Dot Counting Test ("quick" DCT) for detecting invalid performance in isolation and in combination with the Test of Memory Malingering Trial 1 (TOMMT1). METHOD: Data from a mixed clinical sample of 107 veterans (80 valid/27 invalid per independent validity measures and structured criteria) were included in this cross-sectional study; 47% of valid participants were cognitively impaired. Sensitivities/specificities of various 6- and 4-card DCT combinations were calculated and compared to the full, 12-card DCT. Combined models with the most accurate 6- and 4-card combinations and TOMMT1 were then examined. RESULTS: Receiver operator characteristic curve analyses were significant for all 6- and 4-card DCT combinations with areas under the curve of .868-.897. The best 6-card combination (cards, 1-3-5-8-11-12) had 56% sensitivity/90% specificity (E-score cut-off, ≥14.5), and the best 4-card combination (cards, 3-4-8-11) had 63% sensitivity/94% specificity (cut-off, ≥16.75). The full DCT had 70% sensitivity/90% specificity (cut-off, ≥16.00). Logistic regression revealed 95% classification accuracy when 6-card or 4-card "quick" combinations were combined with TOMMT1, with the DCT combinations and TOMMT1 both emerging as significant predictors. CONCLUSIONS: Abbreviated DCT versions utilizing 6- and 4-card combinations yielded comparable sensitivity/specificity as the full DCT. When these "quick" DCT combinations were further combined with an abbreviated memory-based performance validity test (i.e., TOMMT1), overall classification accuracy for identifying invalid performance was 95%.

Cross-validation of three Advanced Clinical Solutions performance validity tests: Examining combinations of measures to maximize classification of invalid performance.

Use of multiple performance validity tests (PVTs) may best identify invalid performance, though few studies have examined the utility and accuracy of combining PVTs. This study examined the following PVTs in the Advanced Clinical Solutions (ACS) package to determine their utility alone and in concert: Word Choice Test (WCT), Reliable Digit Span (RDS), and Logical Memory Recognition (LMR). Ninety-three veterans participated in clinical neuropsychological evaluations to determine presence of cognitive impairment; 25% of the performances were deemed invalid via criterion PVTs. Classification accuracy of the ACS measures was assessed via receiver operating characteristic curves, while logistic regressions determined utility of combining these PVTs. The WCT demonstrated superior classification accuracy compared to the two embedded measures of the ACS, even in veterans with cognitive impairment. The two embedded measures (even when used in concert) exhibited inadequate classification accuracy. A combined model with all three ACS PVTs similarly demonstrated little benefit of the embedded indicators over the WCT alone. Results suggest the ACS WCT has utility for detecting invalid performance in a clinical sample with likely cognitive impairment, though the embedded ACS measures (RDS and LMR) may have limited incremental utility, particularly in individuals with cognitive impairment.

Evaluation of the classification accuracy of multiple performance validity tests in a mixed clinical sample.

The Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) and Word Memory Test (WMT) are among the most well-known performance validity tests (PVTs) and regarded as gold standard measures. Due to the many factors that impact PVT selection, it is imperative that clinicians make informed clinical decisions with respect to additional or alternative PVTs that demonstrate similar classification accuracy as these well-validated measures. The present archival study evaluated the agreement/classification accuracy of a large battery consisting of multiple other freestanding/embedded PVTs in a mixed clinical sample of 126 veterans. We examined failure rates for all standalone/embedded PVTs using established cut-scores and calculated pass/fail agreement rates and diagnostic odds ratios for various combinations of PVTs using the TOMM and WMT as criterion measures. TOMM and WMT demonstrated the best agreement, followed by Word Choice Test (WCT). The Rey Fifteen Item Test had an excessive number of false-negative errors and reduced classification accuracy. The Digit Span age-corrected scaled score (DS-ACSS) had highest agreement. Findings lend further support to the use of a combination of embedded and standalone PVTs in identifying suboptimal performance. Results provide data to enhance clinical decision making for neuropsychologists who implement combinations of PVTs in a larger clinical battery.

Clinical Profile and Long-Term Outcome in Neonatal Cerebral Sinus Venous Thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Neonatal cerebral sinus venous thrombosis (CSVT) causes high morbidity and mortality. Factors associated with either favorable or unfavorable long-term outcomes have not been clearly established. This study aimed to determine the factors involved in long-term neurological outcomes in patients with neonatal CSVT. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with neonatal CSVT at a single institution. Clinical factors associated with long-term neurological outcomes were examined. RESULTS: A total of 67 patients met study inclusion criteria for radiologically confirmed neonatal CSVT. The mean patient follow-up duration was four years (range one week to 16 years, median six years). We observed a favorable neurological outcome defined by a pediatric stroke outcome measures (PSOM) score of 0 to 0.5 in 26 (53%) of osurviving patients at follow-up. An unfavorable neurological outcome as defined by PSOM score >0.5 was observed in 23 survivors (47%). Death was reported in 18 (27%) patients, of which 10 patients died due to direct complications of CSVT. Congential heart disease and genetic disease were associated with significantly increased odds for all-cause death. Cardiorespiratory failure and altered mental status during the initial neurological examination were significantly associated with increased odds of death due to CSVT. Among surviving patients, higher PSOM scores were associated with premature birth (i.e., gestational age < 37 weeks), traumatic birth, site of thrombosis in the straight sinus, site of thrombosis in the internal cerebral veins, and hemorrhagic infarct. In contrast, lower PSOM scores were associated with a normal neurological examination at presentation, thrombosis in only superficial sinuses, and hemorrhage without infarct. There was no statistically significant association between the type and duration of CSVT treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The major factors influencing outcome of neonates following CSVT included comorbid medical conditions, abnormal neurological examination at presentation, location of venous thrombosis, and type of cerebral injury. These results can help guide further studies in neonatal CSVT aiming to decrease morbidity and mortality with the goal of improving long-term neurological outcomes.

Using multivariate base rates of low scores to understand early cognitive declines on the uniform data set 3.0 Neuropsychological Battery.

OBJECTIVE: Low neuropsychological test scores are commonly observed even in cognitively healthy older adults. For batteries designed to assess for and track cognitive decline in older adults, documenting the multivariate base rates (MBRs) of low scores is important to differentiate expected from abnormal low score patterns. Additionally, it is important for our understanding of mild cognitive impairment and preclinical declines to and determine how such score patterns predict future clinical states. METHOD: The current study utilized Uniform Data Set Neuropsychological Battery 3.0 (UDS3NB) data for 5,870 English-speaking, older adult participants from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center from 39 Alzheimer's disease Research Centers from March 2015 to December 2018. MBRs of low scores were identified for 2,608 cognitively healthy participants that had completed all cognitive measures. The association of abnormal MBR patterns with subsequent conversion to mild cognitive impairment and dementia were explored. RESULTS: Depending on the operationalization of "low" score, the MBR of demographically adjusted scores ranged from 1.40 to 79.2%. Posttest probabilities using MBR methods to predict dementia status at 2-year follow up ranged from .06 to .33, while posttest probabilities for conversion to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) ranged from .12-.32. CONCLUSIONS: The data confirm that abnormal cognitive test scores are common among cognitively normal older adults. Using MBR criteria may improve our understanding of MCI. They may also be used to enrich clinical trial selection processes through recruitment of at-risk individuals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Convergent, Discriminant, and Concurrent Validity of Nonmemory-Based Performance Validity Tests.

To supplement memory-based Performance Validity Tests (PVTs) in identifying noncredible performance, we examined the validity of the two most commonly used nonmemory-based PVTs-Dot Counting Test (DCT) and Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth edition (WAIS-IV) Reliable Digit Span (RDS)-as well as two alternative WAIS-IV Digit Span (DS) subtest PVTs. Examinees completed DCT, WAIS-IV DS, and the following criterion PVTs: Test of Memory Malingering, Word Memory Test, and Word Choice Test. Validity groups were determined by passing 3 (valid; n = 69) or failing ⩾2 (noncredible; n = 30) criterion PVTs. DCT, RDS, RDS-Revised (RDS-R), and WAIS-IV DS Age-Corrected Scaled Score (ACSS) were significantly correlated (but uncorrelated with memory-based PVTs). Combining RDS, RDS-R, and ACSS with DCT improved classification accuracy (particularly for DCT/ACSS) for detecting noncredible performance among valid-unimpaired, but largely not valid-impaired examinees. Combining DCT with ACSS may uniquely assess and best supplement memory-based PVTs to identify noncredible neuropsychological test performance in cognitively unimpaired examinees.