Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureterorenoscopy in the treatment of single upper ureteral calculi measuring 1 to 2 centimeters: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) and flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) in the treatment of single upper ureteral calculi measuring 1 to 2 centimeters. METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis that combines a review of medical records with an outcomes management database. A total of 163 patients who underwent MPCNL and 137 patients who had FURS were identified between January 2017 and December 2021. Demographic data, operation time, hospitalization time, stone-free rate, and complication rate were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Preoperative general data of sex, age, BMI, serum creatinine, time of stone existence, stone hardness, stone diameter, preoperative hydronephrosis, and preoperative infection of the MPCNL group have no statistically significant difference with that of the FURS group. All MPCNL or FURS operations in both groups were successfully completed without any instances of reoperation or conversion to another surgical procedure. Patients who underwent MPCNL had a considerably reduced operation time (49.6 vs. 72.4 min; P<0.001), but a higher duration of hospitalization (9.1 vs. 3.9 days; P<0.001) compared to those who underwent FURS. The stone-free rate in the MPCNL group was superior to that of the FURS group, with a percentage of 90.8% compared to 71.5% (P<0.001). There was no statistically significant disparity in the rate of complications between the two groups (13.5% vs. 15.3%; P = 0.741). CONCLUSION: Both MPCNL and FURS are viable and secure surgical choices for individuals with solitary upper ureteral calculi measuring 1 to 2 cm. The FURS procedure resulted in a shorter duration of hospitalization compared to MPCNL. However, it had a comparatively lower rate of successfully removing the stones and required a longer duration for the operation.There were no substantial disparities observed in the complication rate between the two groups.FURS is the preferable option for treating uncomplicated upper ureteral calculi, whereas MPCNL is the preferable option for treating complicated upper ureteral calculi.Prior to making treatment options, it is crucial to take into account the expertise of surgeons, the quality of the equipment, and the preferences of the patient. TRIAL REGISTRATION: No.

Diabetes Mellitus Might Not Be Associated with Any Stone Component in a Local District.

BACKGROUND: Type II diabetes mellitus (DM) is a risk factor for urinary stones, but the pathogenesis remains unclear. The aim of our study was to present the distribution of stone components between DM and no DM group from a local stone center in China and to help the prevention department in decision-making. METHODS: We reviewed the records of patients with upper urinary stones attending our hospital from January 2015 to September 2018. The patients with complete information were divided into 2 groups: type II DM group (DM group) and without DM group (no DM group). The distribution of stone components was analyzed. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-two patients were complicated with DM, whereas 1,894 (89%) were not. Significant difference was found in the distribution of hypertension and BMI (p = 0, p = 0, respectively). Distribution of sex, age, and stone components did not differ between the 2 groups. By the binary logistic analysis, increasing age and sex seemed to be the main risk factors influencing the stone components. Only the calcium stone seemed to be free of the -impact from age and sex. Occurrence of hypertension is a single risk factor for calcium stone from our analysis. Presence of diabetes and increasing BMI was not found to be significantly associated with the risk for any stone component. CONCLUSIONS: In a local district, DM might not be the main factor associated with an increased risk for uric acid stone formation or any stone component. We should also consider the local characteristics of the stone distribution.

Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy, flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of upper urinary calculi in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) showed relatively high incidence of urinary stones. Enlarged kidneys occupied by cysts could make the stone-removal surgery relatively difficult. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (RPLU), flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (FURL) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the ADPKD patients with upper urinary stones. METHODS: In this study, 45 patients with ADPKD who underwent RPLU, FURL and PCNL procedures were evaluated. Demographic and serum parameters, stone features, outcomes and complications were analyzed. RESULTS: 45 patients were included in the present study, 13 received RPLU, 21 received FURL, and 11 received PCNL. There were no significant differences in demographic and serum parameters between the three groups. Stone-free rates of the three approaches are 100%, 85.7% and 90.9%, respectively. Patients who underwent FURL had shorter mean operative time and postoperative hospital stay. Compared to RPLU and PCNL, FURL resulted in fewer complications, but the difference is statistically non-significant. CONCLUSIONS: RPLU, FURL and PCNL are commonly used surgical methods to solve upper urinary calculi in ADPKD patients and could achieve satisfactory stone clearance. Among them, FURL showed a relative high safety and faster recovery.

Treatment of urinary calculi after Yang-Monti ileal ureter reconstruction: a case report.

BACKGROUND: The development of ureteral calculi after Yang-Monti ileal ureter reconstruction has not been reported. This study was performed to explore the safety and effectiveness of ureteroscopy combined with laser lithotripsy in the treatment of ipsilateral lower ureteral calculi and lower calyceal calculi after Yang-Monti ileal ureter reconstruction. CASE PRESENTATION: A 48-year-old man was admitted to our hospital with ipsilateral distal ureteral calculi and ipsilateral lower calyceal calculi. One year prior to this admission, the patient had undergone Yang-Monti ileal ureter reconstruction due to long-segment ureteral stenosis. After conservative treatment failed, we used a rigid ureteroscope with a holmium laser to break up the distal ureteral calculi, and successfully removed the renal calculi with a digital flexible ureteroscope and basket extractor. CONCLUSION: The successful outcome of the present case suggests that ureteroscopy combined with laser lithotripsy is a valuable option for the management of urinary calculi following Yang-Monti ileal ureter reconstruction.

Smartphone-based stent tracking application for prevention of forgotten ureteral double-J stents: a prospective study.

PURPOSE: Retained or forgotten ureteral stents (FUS) have a potential to cause significant morbidity as well as medico-legal issues and increased cost. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and usefulness of smartphone-based Ureteral Stent Tracker (UST) application and compare the results with basic appointment card system to prevent FUS, prospectively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 90 patients who underwent ureteroscopic stone treatment procedure with indwelling DJ stents were equally distributed into two groups. In group-1, patients were followed using UST application. In group-2, only appointment cards were given to the patients. Two groups were compared in terms of stent overdue times and complete lost to follow up rates. RESULTS: Forty-four patients in group-1 and 43 patients in group-2 completed the study. Among patients, 22.7% in group-1 and 27.9% in group-2 did not return for the stent removal on the scheduled day. In group-1, these patients were identified using the UST and called for the stent removal on the same day. After 6 weeks of maximal waiting period, mean overdue times in group-1 and group-2 were 3.5 days and 20 days, respectively (p = 0.001) . In group-2, 3 patients (6.9%) were lost to follow up, while in group-1, it was none (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found that the patients who were followed by the smartphone-based UST application has less overdue times and lost to follow up cases compared to the basic appointment card system. The UST application easily follows patients with indwelling ureteral stents and can identify patients when overdue.

Ureterolithotripsy for a Ureteral Calculus at the Ureteroureterostomy of a Renal-transplant Recipient.

We describe a 40-year-old living-donor renal-transplant recipient who underwent successful ureterolithotripsy. He had been on hemodialysis for >15 years pre-transplant and underwent ureteroureterostomy along with the surgery. One year post-transplant, ultrasound examination demonstrated hydronephrosis, and CT showed a 6-mm ureteral calculus at the ureteroureterostomy site. No pain and no elevated serum creatinine were present. As the ureter was easily accessed, we performed a ureterolithotripsy, which would confirm whether a suture caused the calculus. Despite ureteral tortuosity, laser stone fragmentation succeeded. The calculus was completely removed with an antegrade guidewire. Mild postoperative ureteral stenosis resolved with a temporary ureteral stent without balloon dilation. Ureterolithotripsy is effective even in renal transplant recipients with ureteroureterostomy.

Epidemiologic study of urolithiasis in seven countries of South-Eastern Europe: S.E.G.U.R. 1 study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate some epidemiological aspects of kidney stones in the South- Eastern European area. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From September 2015 to December 2015, 538 consecutive patients were treated and evaluated for reno-ureteral stones in eight departments in Bulgaria, Greece, Italy, FYR Macedonia, Romania, Serbia and Turkey. RESULTS: The age of onset was lower in Turkey and higher in Italy. The rate of recurrent patients was higher in Romania and Serbia, while first renal stone formers were more frequent in Italy. The previous history of kidney stones, the characteristics of the stones and the dietary habits of the patients were different in different countries. In Bulgaria, Greece and Romania larger calculi from recurrent patients were more frequent. In Italy and Turkey smaller calculi from first renal stone formers were more frequent. CONCLUSIONS: The previous history of kidney stones, the characteristics of the stones and the dietary habits of the patients were different in different countries. A common dietary pattern associated with the formation of kidney stones was not observed, but each country showed different risk factors.

[Flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser lithotripsy for upper urinary tract stones in neurologic patients with severe motor disability]. / L'urétérorénoscopie souple avec fragmentation laser dans le traitement des calculs du haut appareil urinaire chez les patients atteints d'une maladie du système nerveux avec un handicap moteur sévère.

OBJECTIVE: The study's objective was to evaluate the effectiveness and morbidity of flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser lithotripsy for upper urinary tract stones in patients with a nervous system pathology including severe motor disability. METHODS: Between 2006 and 2013, we retrospectively analyzed 83 flexible ureterorenoscopy to treat 63 kidneys in 42 patients. Stone free (SF) kidneys defined as an absence of stones on computerized tomography, renal ultrasound, X-ray or direct ureterorenoscopy, were considered a surgical success. Complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo system. RESULTS: Success rates were 49.2 %, 57.1 % and 58.7 %, respectively after first, second and third flexible ureterorenoscopy procedure. Clearance after one procedure was achieved in 64.3 % of cases involving less than 20mm stones. No major complication (Clavien-Dindo>2) was described (0 %). Complication rates were 44.7 %, with 31.6 % Clavien-Dindo 2. The main complication was urosepsis, which occurred in 27.6 % of cases. CONCLUSION: Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsies for upper urinary tract stones in neurologic patients with severe motor disability are associated with a lower success rate and some frequent low grade complications compared to overall population. In clinical practice, the indications of flexible ureterorenoscopy for these patients seem restricted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5.

Kinking of the upper ureter in CT urography: anatomic and clinical significance.

PURPOSE: Although the course of the ureter is described as a straight descent in the retroperitoneum, kinking of the upper ureter is often seen at imaging. The aim of this study was to investigate kinking of the ureter and its underlying anatomico-clinical significance. METHODS: We evaluated 176 computed tomography (CT) images and classified kinking into three grades: no/mild kinking as Grade 1, moderate as Grade 2, and severe as Grade 3. We defined the "crossing point" (CP) as where the ureter crosses over the gonadal vein and assessed its relation to the kinking. Fourteen halves from seven cadavers were used for examination. Approaching anteriorly, we macroscopically observed the ureter and surrounding structures. RESULTS: On CT, the rate of the radiologically "significant" kinking classified into either Grade 2 or 3 was 18.4 % on the right and 21.8 % on the left. All kinking was either at or above the level of the CP. In cadavers, the ureter was relatively mobile in the perirenal fat and then beginning at approximately the level of the CP became firmly fixed to the anteromedial aspect of the psoas major muscle. CONCLUSIONS: Kinking of the upper ureter is not a clinically significant finding and arises from the ureter having a relatively mobile portion in the perirenal space compared to its caudal portion. The fixation boundary can be identified by observing the CP.

[A Case of Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery for Multiple Encrusted Stones on a Forgotten Ureteral Stent Left for 4 Years].

A 43-year-old man underwent extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for a left ureteral stone and implantation of a loop stent for the treatment of stone pain in February 2011. However, he was lost to follow-up before the complete removal of the stones and stent. He presented to our hospital with left back pain in March 2015. An abdominal radiograph and a noncontrast computed tomography showed extensive stone formation throughout the stent. A single cystolithotripsy and a double endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS)were performed. All the stones and the encrusted ureteral stent were successfully removed.

[A Case Report of 2,8-Dihydroxyadenine Stone].

Here we report a case of a 2,8-dihydroxyadenine (2,8-DHA) stone. A 48-year-old woman arrived at our hospital with left flank pain. She was diagnosed with a left ureteral stone. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) was tried, but the left ureteral stone was radiolucent and ESWL was not effective. Transurethral ureterolithotripsy (TUL) was successful. An analysis of the stone revealed 2,8-DHA. A 2,8-DHA stone is caused by adenine phosphoribosyltransferase (APRT) deficiency. By genetic tests, she was diagnosed with APRT deficiency.

Successful endourological management of the 'forgotten' stent in a transplanted kidney.

BACKGROUND: Ureteric stents are used to prevent urological complications like ureteric fistulas and obstruction in kidney transplants. Despite its advantages, complications arising from delayed removal of a double J (DJ) stent include urinary tract infections, stone encrustation, and migration of the DJ stent [Sansalone et al.: Transplant Proc 2005;37:2511-2515]. Encrustation of the stent makes removal difficult and risks injury to the transplanted kidney. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of retained DJ stent for 19 years presenting with recurrent urinary tract infections. A radiograph revealed a retained ureteric stent extending from the right iliac fossa transplant kidney to the urinary bladder with multiple foci of large calcification along its length. Two sessions of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy along the stent were performed after a percutaneous nephrostomy tube had been placed in the transplanted kidney. Subsequently, the retained DJ stent was removed endoscopically after laser lithotripsy to remnant calcifications. Remnant stone fragments were removed with another session of ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy. The patient achieved complete stent and stone clearance with a functioning graft. CONCLUSION: This case illustrates that significant stone encrustation of the retained stent in a transplanted kidney can be treated successfully with a combination of endourological techniques.

Foreign body stone of the ureter originated from the suture thread: a case report.

Foreign bodies placed into the ureter are uncommon. Unintentionally placed nonabsorbable sutures may cause obstruction and stone formation. If not recognized, the patient may become symptomatic. We present a diagnosis of a rare case from Turkey, in which a ureter stone was formed by a nonabsorbable suture in a male patient with a previous laparotomy.

Is extracorporeal lithotripsy a first-line treatment for urinary stones today?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and complications of extracorporeal lithotripsy (SWL) as a first-line treatment for renal and ureteral stones METHODS: Retrospective and observational study of all the patients treated with lithotripsy in a third level center between January 2014 and January 2021; characteristics of the patients, the stones, complications and results of SWL is recollected. Multivariate logistic regression of the factors associated with stone size reduction was performed. A statistical analysis of the factors associated with additional treatment after SWL and factors associated with complications is also executed. RESULTS: 1727 patients are included. Stone mean size was 9,5mm. 1540 (89.4%) patients presented reduction in stone size. In multivariate analysis, stone size (OR=1.13; p=0.00), ureteral location of the lithiasis (OR=1.15; p=0.052) and number of waves (p=0.002; OR=1.00) used in SWL are the factors associated with reduction of stone size. Additional treatment after lithotripsy was needed in 665 patients (38.5%). The factors associated with the need for retreatment were stone size (OR=1.131; p=0.000), number of waves (OR=1.000; p=0.000), energy (OR=1.005; p=0.000). 153 patients (8.8%) suffered complications after SWL. A statistically significant association was found between the size of the lithiasis (p=0.024, OR=1.054) and the previous urinary diversion (P=0.004, OR=0.571). CONCLUSION: Lithotripsy remains an effective treatment as the first line of therapy for reno-ureteral lithiasis with a low percentage of complications.

Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy with ureteral access sheath in a transplanted kidney: case report and literature review.

This is the case of a 69-year-old woman with a history of right iliac fossa living-related kidney transplant that developed acute renal failure due to an obstructing stone in the proximal transplant ureter. She was successfully treated with mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy wherein a 14-Fr tract was created with serial dilation and a 14-Fr ureteral access sheath was used for access. A flexible ureteroscope with holmium laser and a helical wire basket were used to fragment and extract the stone, respectively. A 10-Fr nephrostomy tube was left for postoperative drainage. There are only a few published reports of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in transplant kidneys, but those reports suggest that the procedure is safe and effective.

Effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in urolithiasis patients under 2 years of age.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we present our extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) outcomes in urolithiasis patients under the age of two. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The procedure was performed with patients < 2 years of age sedated, under anesthesia using ketamine and Dormicum (midazolam), in the supine position. Fragmentation was evaluated by fluoroscopy after the procedure. RESULTS: A total of 74 procedures were performed on 65 kidneys. One patient with bilateral stones had two sessions of ESWL on the right side; three sessions of ESWL were performed in one patient with a unilateral stone, and two sessions were performed in seven patients with unilateral stones. All other patients underwent one session of ESWL. As post-procedural complications, hematuria was observed in 14 patients (12 mild and 2 significant), and vomiting occurred in 1 patient. Ureterorenoscopy was performed in 5 patients, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in 6 patients due to a failed procedure. CONCLUSION: As a result, ESWL treatment is effective and has advantages such as a short hospitalization time, good reproducibility, cost-effectiveness, and a low rate of complications. Therefore, we recommend ESWL as the first-line treatment for renal and proximal ureteral stones in infants < 2 years of age.

OBIETIVO: En este estudio, presentamos nuestros resultados de ESWL en pacientes con urolitiasis menores de dos años. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: El procedimiento se realizó con pacientes menores de dos años sedados, bajo anestesia con ketamina y Dormicum (midazolam), en posición supina. La fragmentación se evaluó mediante fluoroscopia después del procedimiento. RESULTADOS: Se realizaron total de 74 procedimientos en 65 riñones. Un paciente con cálculos bilaterales tuvo dos sesiones de ESWL en el lado derecho; se realizaron tres sesiones de LEOC en un paciente con litiasis unilateral y dos sesiones en siete pacientes con litiasis unilateral. Todos los demás pacientes se sometieron a una sesión de ESWL. Como complicaciones post-procedimiento se observó hematuria en 14 pacientes (12 leves y 2 significativas) y vómitos en 1 paciente. Se realizó URS en 5 pacientes y NLP en 6 pacientes debido a un procedimiento fallido. CONCLUSIONES: Como resultado, el tratamiento de la ESWL es efectivo y tiene ventajas como un tiempo de hospitalización corto, buena reproducibilidad, costo-efectividad y baja tasa de complicaciones. Por tanto, recomendamos la ESWL como tratamiento de primera línea para cálculos renales y ureterales proximales en bebés < 2 años de edad.

Risk factor analysis for infection and bleeding after lateral decubitus percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

This study aimed to explore the risk factors for infection and bleeding after lateral decubitus percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures to prevent their occurrence and improve surgical outcomes. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 356 patients who underwent lateral decubitus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of kidney stones and upper ureteral stones from January 2015 to August 2022. Among them, 290 patients had complete clinical data. General clinical data, perioperative data, and stone characteristics were collected for each patient. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for infection and bleeding after lateral decubitus percutaneous nephrolithotomy. The postoperative infection rate after lateral decubitus percutaneous nephrolithotomy was 19.31%, and the postoperative bleeding rate was 12.07%. Independent risk factors for postoperative infection were multiple stones (P < .001), stone size (P < .001), and stone co-infection (P = .012). Independent risk factors for postoperative bleeding were multiple stones (P = .008) and stone size (P = .014). Multiple stones, stone size, and stone co-infection are independent risk factors for postoperative infection after lateral decubitus percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Multiple stones and stone size are independent risk factors for postoperative bleeding after lateral decubitus percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Does prior failed shock-wave lithotripsy impact outcomes of ureterorenoscopy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing ureterorenoscopy (URS) after failed shock-wave lithotripsy (SWL) (Salvage URS) with those undergoing URS without any history of SWL (Primary URS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched up to 10th January 2021 for studies comparing outcomes of salvage URS vs. primary URS. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for procedure success and complications. Operating time was summarized using mean difference (MD). RESULTS: Seven retrospective studies were included. Meta-analysis indicated no statistically significant difference in the success rates of URS between the salvage URS and primary URS groups (OR: 0.83 95% CI: 0.65, 1.06 I2=0% p=0.13). On subgroup analysis, the success rate was significantly reduced in the salvage URS group for renal stones (OR: 0.55 95% CI: 0.34, 0.91 I2=0% p=0.02) but with no difference for ureter stones OR: 0.90 95% CI: 0.67, 1.21 I2=0% p=0.49). Pooled analysis demonstrated a tendency of longer operating time in the salvage URS group as compared to the primary URS group, albeit with a statistically non-significant difference (MD: 8.91 95% CI: -0.56, 18.38 I2=98% p=0.07). Meta-analysis indicated significantly increased complications in the salvage URS group as compared to the primary URS group (OR: 1.83 95% CI: 1.34, 2.49 I2=0% p=0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from retrospective studies suggests that patients undergoing salvage URS for renal stones have significantly lower success rates which is not the case for ureteral stones. There is a non-significant tendency of increased operating times for salvage URS. Complication rates are significantly higher for salvage URS as compared to primary URS. Future studies with propensity-score matching are required to strengthen current conclusions.

Laparoscopic transperitoneal ureterolithotomy is an effective and safe method for >15 mm impacted ureteral stones in elderly patients: single center 10-year experience.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic ureterolithotomy operation in elderly patients with large and impacted ureteral stones. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2011 and July 2021, 66 elderly patients with impacted, > 15 mm upper and middle ureteral stones underwent laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in our center. The data for all patients were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 65 ± 5.43 years. The mean stone size was 20.2 ± 2.5 mm. The mean operation time was 93.6 ± 13.2 minutes. Among patients, 16 (24.2%) had history of unsuccessful shock wave lithotripsy and 12 (18.1%) patients had history of ureterorenoscopy. Stone-free rate was 95.4% in all patients. Modified Clavien grade 1 complications were seen in 18 patients (27.2%), but no significant perioperative and postoperative complications were observed. Urinary extravasation lasting 5, 7 and 9 days was observed in 5 patients (7.5%) who were treated conservatively. The mean hospital stay was 3.4 ± 1.52 days. The patients were asymptomatic at the 6th week post-op follow-up, and no stones were seen on direct X-ray and abdominal ultrasonography. Intravenous urography and non-contrast tomography (NCCT) taken 3 months later did not show any obstruction or stenosis in the ureter. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy can be considered as the first treatment option for elderly patients with impacted and large ureteral stones, thanks to its high success and acceptable complication rates.