Rod Attachment Induces Significant Strain in Lumbosacral Fixation.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a laboratory investigation. OBJECTIVE: Rod attachment can induce significant pedicle screw-and-rod pre- strain that may predispose the instrumentation to failure. This study investigated how in vitro L5-S1 rod strain and S1 screw strain during rod-screw attachment (pre-strain) compared with strains recorded during pure-moment bending ( test- strain). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The lumbosacral junction is highly vulnerable to construct failure due to rod fatigue fracture, sacral screw pull-out, and screw fatigue fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve cadaveric specimens were instrumented with L2-ilium pedicle screws and rod. Strain gauges on contoured rods and sacral screws recorded strains during sequential rod-to-screw tightening (pre-strains). The same instrumented constructs were immediately tested in a 6-degree-of-freedom apparatus under continuous loading to 7.5 Nm in multidirectional bending while recording instrumentation test-strains. Rod and screw pre-strains and test-strains were compared using 1-way repeated-measures analysis of variance followed by Holm-Sidák paired analysis (significant at P <0.05). RESULTS: The mean first (171±192 µE) and second (322±269 µE) rod attachment pre-strains were comparable to mean test-strains during flexion (265±109 µE) and extension (315±125 µE, P ≥0.13). The mean rod attachment pre-strain was significantly greater than mean test-strains during bidirectional lateral bending (40±32 µE ipsilateral and 39±32 µE contralateral, P <0.001) and axial rotation (72±60 µE ipsilateral and 60±57 µE contralateral, P <0.001). The mean first and second sacral screw pre-strains during rod attachment (1.03±0.66 and 1.39±1.00 Nm, respectively) did not differ significantly ( P =0.41); however, the mean sacral screw pre-strain during final (second) rod attachment was significantly greater than screw test-strains during all directions of movement (≤0.81 Nm, P ≤0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Instrumentation pre-strains imposed during in vitro rod-screw attachment of seemingly well-contoured rods in L2-ilium fixation are comparable to, and at times greater than, strains experienced during in vitro bending. Spine surgeons should be aware of the biomechanical consequences of rod contouring and attachment on construct vulnerability.

Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy Construct Optimization: A Cadaveric Study of Various Multirod and Interbody Configurations.

STUDY DESIGN: Fourteen cadaveric specimens were separated into two groups: (1) L3 pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) or (2) lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF). A 2-rod configuration (2R) was compared with two supplemental rod configurations: 4-rod (4R) with accessory rods (ARs) using connectors or 4R with satellite rods (SRs) without connectors. OBJECTIVE: Compare PSO constructs with different rod configurations and adjacent-level interbody support. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Supplemental rods and anterior column support enhance biomechanical performance. METHODS: Pure moments were applied in (1) intact, (2) pedicle screws and rods, (3) PSO + 2R, (4) 4R AR, and (5) 4R SR conditions. Primary and supplemental rods had strain gauges across the index level. Sacral screw bending moments and range of motion (ROM) were recorded. RESULTS: For TLIF, AR decreased ROM during flexion (P = 0.02) and extension (P < 0.001) versus 2R. For LLIF, AR and SR decreased motion versus 2R during left (AR: P  = 0.03; SR: P  = 0.04) and right (AR: P  = 0.002; SR: P  = 0.01) axial rotation. For LLIF, sacral screw strain increased with SR compared with AR in compression and right lateral bending (P ≤ 0.03). During lateral bending, rod strain increased with PSO+TLIF+SR versus PSO+LLIF+2R and PSO+LLIF+AR (P ≤ 0.02). For LLIF, SR configuration increased rod strain versus AR during flexion, extension, and lateral bending (P≤ 0.01); for TLIF, rod strain increased with SR versus AR during extension (P = 0.03). For LLIF, AR configuration increased posterior supplemental rod strain versus SR during flexion (P = 0.02) and lateral bending (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Both supplemental rod configurations reduced motion in both groups. Constructs with the SR configuration increased the primary rod strain and the sacral screw bending moment compared with AR constructs, which can share strain. Deep-seated SRs, which have become increasingly popular, may be more vulnerable to failure than ARs. LLIF provided more stability in sagittal plane. Protective effect of supplemental rods on rod strain was more effective with TLIF.Level of Evidence: NA.

Accuracy of Subaxial Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement Using Direct Visualization Versus Computed Tomography-Based Navigation.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of operative data from cadaveric cervical spines. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of neuronavigation compared with laminotomy with direct visualization (DV) of the pedicle for placement of subaxial pedicle screws. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Subaxial pedicle screws provide superior fixation compared with other posterior cervical fixation strategies. However, high accuracy is required for safe placement, given the proximity of critical neurovascular structures. Computed tomography (CT)-based neuronavigation has increased in popularity for placement of spinal implants, including subaxial pedicle screws. However, the accuracy of the technique for this application has not been extensively evaluated. METHODS: Six fresh-frozen cadaveric spines (occiput to T2) were prepared. Pedicle screws were placed from C3 to C7 on either side using either the DV or neuronavigation technique (alternating sides between specimens). Pedicles with diameters <4 mm were excluded. For the DV technique, a hemilaminotomy was performed for DV of pedicle borders and to determine appropriate screw medialization and trajectory. Neuronavigation screws were placed using CT-based navigation with a reference frame mounted on the C2 spinous process. Screw position was evaluated using postoperative CT, and breaches were classified using the Neo classification. RESULTS: Fifty pedicle screws were placed at 25 levels in 6 cadaveric spines; 25 screws each were placed using neuronavigation or DV. No significant difference in accuracy was found between the 2 techniques. Three (12%) breaches occurred in the DV group, and 9 (36%) breaches occurred in the neuronavigation group (P=0.10). The breaches were evenly distributed across all levels. There were no high-grade breaches with DV and only 1 (4.0%) with neuronavigation (P>0.99). Average pedicle cortical and medullary bone widths were higher for levels with no breach (P=0.009 and P=0.02, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: High accuracy can be achieved with both neuronavigation and DV for placement of subaxial cervical pedicle screws in cadavers.

Novel Distributed Loading Technique Using Multimaterial, Long-Segment Spinal Constructs to Prevent Proximal Junctional Pathology in Adult Spinal Deformity Correction-Operative Technique and Radiographic Findings.

BACKGROUND: Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and proximal junction failure are common and costly complications after long-segment adult spinal deformity (ASD) correction. Although much research has focused on the concept of "softening the landing" to prevent proximal junction pathologies, long-segment constructs largely deviate from the force-deformation curve of the physiologic spine. Our novel distributed loading technique for ASD correction is described using multimaterial, long-segment constructs to create a biomechanically sound, yet physiologic, decremental stiffness toward the rostral end. METHODS: Operative steps detail the custom-designed constructs of dual-headed pedicle screws and varied rod diameters and materials (cobalt chromium or titanium) for an initial 20 patients (mean 66.6 ± 4.8 years). Standing scoliosis films were obtained preoperatively and at regular intervals postoperatively to assess for PJK. RESULTS: No patient had evidence of PJK or proximal junction failure at latest radiographic follow-up (mean 17.9 months, range 13-25 months). Radiographic findings for sagittal vertical axis averaged 11.2 ± 5.6 cm preoperatively and 3.6 ± 2.3 cm postoperatively. Compared with preoperative parameters, postoperative reductions in pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch averaged 28.7 ± 12.9 degrees, and sagittal vertical axis averaged 7.6 ± 5.2 cm while PJA was essentially unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary results suggest that the distributed loading technique is promising for prevention of PJK with stiffness gradients that mimic the force-deformation curve of the physiologic posterior tension band. Our technique may optimize the degree of stress at the proximal junction without overwhelming the anterior column bony while remodeling and mature arthrodesis takes place.

Biomechanics of open versus minimally invasive deformity correction:​ comparison of stability and rod strain between pedicle subtraction osteotomy and anterior column realignment.

OBJECTIVE: Anterior column realignment (ACR) is a new minimally invasive approach for deformity correction that achieves a degree of lordosis similar to that obtained with pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO). This study compared the biomechanical profiles of ACR with PSO using range of motion (ROM) and posterior rod strain (RS) to gain insight into the ACR technique and the necessary surgical strategies to optimize longevity and stability. METHODS: An in vitro biomechanical study using standard flexibility testing (7.5 Nm) was performed on 14 human cadaveric specimens, separated into 2 groups similar in age, sex, bone mineral density, and intact ROM. For group 1 (n = 7, instrumented L1-S1), a 30° ACR was performed at L3-4. For group 2 (n = 7, instrumented T12-S1), a 30° L3 PSO was performed. Specimens were subjected to nondestructive loads in flexion, extension, axial rotation, lateral bending, and compression. Conditions tested were 1) intact, 2) pedicle screw with 2 rods (PSR), 3) ACR or PSO with 2 rods (+2R), and 4) ACR or PSO with 4 rods (+4R). Primary outcome measures of interest were ROM stability and posterior RS at L3-4. RESULTS: No difference was observed between groups in lumbar lordosis (p = 0.83) or focal angular lordosis at L3-4 (p = 0.75). No differences in stability were observed between ACR+2R and PSO+2R (p ≥ 0.06);​ however, ACR+2R was significantly less stable than PSR in flexion and extension (p ≤ 0.02), whereas PSO+2R was less stable than PSR only in extension (p = 0.04). ACR+4R was more stable than ACR+2R in flexion, extension, left axial rotation, and compression (p ≤ 0.02). PSO+4R was more stable than PSO+2R only in extension (p = 0.04). Both ACR+2R and PSO+2R resulted in significant increases in RS in flexion and extension compared with PSR (p ≤ 0.032). RS in flexion and extension decreased significantly for ACR+4R versus ACR+2R and for PSO+4R versus PSO+2R (p ≤ 0.047). PSO+2R yielded lower RS than ACR+2R in compression (p = 0.03). No differences existed in RS between ACR+4R and PSO+4R (p ≥ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although ACR appeared to be slightly more destabilizing than PSO using traditional 2R fixation, both techniques resulted in significant increases in posterior RS. The 4R technique increased stability in ACR and decreased RS in both ACR and PSO but may be more beneficial in ACR. Longer-term clinical studies are needed to appropriately identify the durability of the ACR technique in deformity correction.

Impact of dual-headed pedicle screws on the biomechanics of lumbosacral junction multirod constructs.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate a novel connector design and compare it with traditional side connectors, such as a fixed-angle connector (FAC) and a variable-angle connector (VAC), with respect to lumbosacral stability and instrumentation strain. METHODS: Standard nondestructive flexibility tests (7.5 Nm) and compression tests (400 N) were performed using 7 human cadaveric specimens (L1-ilium) to compare range of motion (ROM) stability, posterior rod strain (RS), and sacral screw bending moment (SM). Directions of motion included flexion, extension, left and right lateral bending, left and right axial rotation, and compression. Conditions included 1) the standard 2-rod construct (2R); 2) the dual-tulip head (DTH) with 4-rod construct (4R); 3) FACs with 4R; and 4) VACs with 4R. Data were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA. RESULTS: Overall, there were no statistically significant differences in ROM across the lumbosacral junction among conditions (p > 0.07). Compared with 2R, DTH and FAC significantly reduced RS in extension, left axial rotation, and compression (p ≤ 0.03). VAC significantly decreased RS compared with 2R in flexion, extension, left axial rotation, right axial rotation, and compression (p ≤ 0.03), and significantly decreased RS compared with DTH in extension (p = 0.02). DTH was associated with increased SM in left and right axial rotation compared with 2R (p ≤ 0.003) and in left and right lateral bending and left and right axial rotation compared with FAC and VAC (p ≤ 0.02). FAC and VAC were associated with decreased SM compared with 2R in right and left lateral bending (p ≤ 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: RS across the lumbosacral junction can be high. Supplemental rod fixation with DTH is an effective strategy for reducing RS across the lumbosacral junction. However, the greatest reduction in RS and SM was achieved with a VAC that allowed for straight (uncontoured) accessory rod placement.

Functional improvement in hand strength and dexterity after surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective quantitative study.

OBJECTIVE: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is the primary cause of adult spinal cord dysfunction. Diminished hand strength and reduced dexterity associated with CSM contribute to disability. Here, the authors investigated the impact of CSM severity on hand function using quantitative testing and evaluated the response to surgical intervention. METHODS: Thirty-three patients undergoing surgical treatment of CSM were prospectively enrolled in the study. An occupational therapist conducted 3 functional hand tests: 1) palmar dynamometry to measure grip strength, 2) hydraulic pinch gauge test to measure pinch strength, and 3) 9-hole peg test (9-HPT) to evaluate upper extremity dexterity. Tests were performed preoperatively and 6-8 weeks postoperatively. Test results were expressed as 1) a percentile relative to age- and sex-stratified norms and 2) achievement of a minimum clinically important (MCI) difference. Patients were stratified into groups (mild, moderate, and severe myelopathy) based on their modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score. The severity of stenosis on preoperative MRI was graded by three independent physicians using the Kang classification. RESULTS: The primary presenting symptoms were neck pain (33%), numbness (21%), imbalance (12%), and upper extremity weakness (12%). Among the 33 patients, 61% (20) underwent anterior approach decompression, with a mean (SD) of 2.9 (1.5) levels treated. At baseline, patients with moderate and low mJOA scores (indicating more severe myelopathy) had lower preoperative pinch (p < 0.001) and grip (p = 0.01) strength than those with high mJOA scores/mild myelopathy. Postoperative improvement was observed in all hand function domains except pinch strength in the nondominant hand, with MCI differences at 6 weeks ranging from 33% of patients in dominant-hand strength tests to 73% of patients in nondominant-hand dexterity tests. Patients with moderate baseline mJOA scores were more likely to have MCI improvement in dominant grip strength (58.3%) than those with low mJOA scores/severe myelopathy (30%) and high mJOA scores/mild myelopathy (9%, p = 0.04). Dexterity in the dominant hand as measured by the 9-HPT ranged from < 1 in patients with cord signal change to 15.9 in patients with subarachnoid effacement only (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CSM achieved significant improvement in strength and dexterity postoperatively. Baseline strength measures correlated best with the preoperative mJOA score; baseline dexterity correlated best with the severity of stenosis on MRI. The majority of patients experienced MCI improvements in dexterity. Baseline pinch strength correlated with postoperative mJOA MCI improvement, and patients with moderate baseline mJOA scores were the most likely to have improvement in dominant grip strength postoperatively.

Selective posterior cerebral artery amobarbital test: a predictor of memory following subtemporal selective amygdalohippocampectomy.

BACKGROUND: The selective posterior cerebral artery (PCA) amobarbital test, or PCA Wada test, is used to predict memory impairment after epilepsy surgery in patients who have previously had a failed internal carotid artery (ICA) amobarbital test. METHODS: Medical records from 2012 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed for all patients with seizures who underwent a selective PCA Wada test at our institution following a failed or inconclusive ICA Wada test. Standardized neuropsychological testing was performed before and during the Wada procedure and postoperatively in patients who underwent resection. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients underwent a selective PCA Wada test, with no complications. Twenty-six patients with medically refractory epilepsy had a seizure focus amenable to selective amygdalohippocampectomy (AHE). Six patients (23%, n=26) had a failed PCA Wada test and did not undergo selective AHE, seven (27%) declined surgical resection, leaving 13 patients who underwent subtemporal selective AHE. Hippocampal sclerosis was found in all 13 patients (100%). Twelve patients (92%) subsequently underwent formal neuropsychological testing and all were found to have stable memory. Ten patients (77%) were seizure-free (Engel Class I), with average follow-up of 13 months. CONCLUSION: The selective PCA Wada test is predictive of memory outcomes after subtemporal selective AHE in patients with a failed or inconclusive ICA Wada test. Furthermore, given the low risk of complications and potential benefit of seizure freedom, a selective PCA Wada test may be warranted in patients with medically intractable epilepsy who are candidates for a selective AHE and who have a prior failed or inconclusive ICA Wada test.

Optimizing biomechanics of anterior column realignment for minimally invasive deformity correction.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Anterior column realignment (ACR) is a powerful but destabilizing minimally invasive technique for sagittal deformity correction. Optimal biomechanical design of the ACR construct is unknown. PURPOSE: Evaluate the effect of ACR design on radiographic lordosis, range of motion (ROM) stability, and rod strain (RS) in a cadaveric model. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Cadaveric biomechanical study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Seven fresh-frozen lumbar spine cadaveric specimens (T12-sacrum) underwent ACR at L3-L4 with a 30° implant. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measure of interest was maximum segmental lordosis measured using lateral radiograph. Secondary outcomes were ROM stability and posterior RS at L3/4. METHODS: Effect of grade 1 and grade 2 osteotomies with single-screw anterolateral fixation (1XLP) or 2-screw anterolateral fixation (2XLP) on lordosis was determined radiographically. Nondestructive flexibility tests were used to assess ROM and RS at L3-L4 in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Conditions included (1) intact, (2) pedicle screw fixation and 2 rods (2R), (3) ACR+1XLP with 2R, (4) ACR+2XLP+2R, (5) ACR+1XLP with 4 rods (4R) (+4R), and (6) ACR+2XLP+4R. RESULTS: Segmental lordosis was similar between ACR+1XLP and ACR+2XLP (p>.28). ACR+1XLP+2R was significantly less stable than all other conditions in flexion, extension, and axial rotation (p<.014); however, adding an extra screw improved stability to levels equal to 4R conditions (p>.36). Adding 4R to ACR+1XLP reduced RS in all directions of loading (p<.048), whereas adding a second screw did not (p>.12). There was no difference in strain between ACR+1XLP+4R and ACR+2XLP+4R (p>.55). CONCLUSIONS: For maximum stability, ACR constructs should contain either fixation into both vertebral bodies (2XLP) or accessory rods (4R). 2XLP can be used without compromising the maximal achievable lordosis but does not provide the same RS reduction as 4R. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: ACR is a highly destabilizing technique that is increasingly being used for minimally invasive deformity correction. These biomechanical data will help clinicians optimize ACR construct design.

Release of Anterior Longitudinal Ligament in Setting of Unfavorable Vascular Anatomy for Anterior Column Realignment-Technical Note: 2-Dimensional Operative Video.

Anterior column realignment (ACR) with anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL) release from a lateral transpsoas approach is increasingly being used as a minimally invasive technique to restore lordosis. Safe execution requires a plane between the ALL and the anterior vasculature. An unfavorable plane on preoperative imaging is a contraindication to using the technique. We describe a patient undergoing multistage minimally invasive correction of a flat-back deformity who had an unfavorable plane between the ALL and vasculature at L4-5. Patient consent was provided, and Institutional Review Board approval was not required. To safely complete the ALL release and ACR, we elected to sharply incise the lateral aspect of the ligament at L4-5 with direct control of the vessels during the anterior approach for an L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion. We then moved to the lateral transpsoas approach and used controlled distraction techniques to complete the ALL release and then to complete the ACR in a standard fashion. We ultimately achieved excellent realignment with correction of the patient's flat-back deformity using minimally invasive surgical techniques while minimizing vascular risk. Used with permission from Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona.

The Role of Potentially Modifiable Factors in a Standard Work Protocol to Decrease Complications in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Systematic Review, Part 1.

STUDY DESIGN: Structured Literature Review. OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the peer-reviewed literature for potentially modifiable patient and surgical factors that could be incorporated into a Standard Work protocol to decrease complications in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Lean Methodology uses Standard Work to improve efficiency and decrease waste and error. ASD is known to have a high surgical complication rate. Several patient and surgical potentially modifiable factors have been suggested to affect complications, including preoperative hemoglobin, bone density, body mass index (BMI), age-appropriate realignment, preoperative albumin/prealbumin, and smoking status. We sought to evaluate the literature for evidence supporting these factors to include in a Standard Work protocol to decrease complications. METHODS: Each of these six factors was developed into an appropriate clinical question that included the patient population, surgical intervention, a comparison group, and outcomes measure (PICO question). A comprehensive literature search was then performed. The authors reviewed abstracts and analyzed data from included studies. From 456 initial citations with abstract, 173 articles underwent full-text review. The best available evidence for clinical questions regarding the influence of these factors was provided by 93 included studies. RESULTS: We found fair evidence supporting a low preoperative hemoglobin level associated with increased transfusion rates and decreased BMD and increased BMI associated with increased complication rates. Fair evidence supported low albumin/prealbumin associated with increased complications. There was fair evidence associating smoking exposure to increased reoperations, but conflicting evidence associating it with increased complications. There was no evidence in the literature evaluating age-appropriate realignment and complications. CONCLUSION: Preoperative hemoglobin, bone density, body mass index, preoperative albumin/prealbumin, and smoking status all are potentially modifiable risk factors that are associated with increased complications in the adult spine surgery population. Developing a Standard Work Protocol for patient evaluation and optimization should include these factors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Styloidogenic Jugular Venous Compression Syndrome: Clinical Features and Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Styloidogenic jugular venous compression syndrome (SJVCS) is a rare cause of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the pathophysiology and the hemodynamics of SJVCS. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of medical records, clinical images, dynamic venography, and manometry for consecutive patients with SJVCS undergoing microsurgical decompression from April 2009 to October 2017. Patients with IIH with normal venography and manometry findings served as controls. RESULTS: Data were analyzed for 10 patients with SJVCS who presented with headaches. Neck flexion exacerbated headaches in 7 patients. Eleven patients with IIH provided control data for normal intracranial venous pressure and styloid process anatomy. Patients with SJVCS had bilateral osseous compression of venous outflow. The styloid processes were significantly longer in patients with SJVCS than in those with IIH (mean [standard deviation (SD)] distance, 31.0 [10.6] vs 19.0 [14.1] mm; P < .01). The styloid process-C1 lateral tubercle distance was shorter in patients with SJVCS than in those with IIH (mean [SD] distance, 2.9 [1.0] vs 9.9 [2.8] mm; P < .01). Patients with SJVCS had significantly higher global venous pressure and a higher pressure gradient across the stenosis site than controls (mean [SD] pressure, 2.86 [2.61] vs 0.13 [1.09] cm H2O; P = .09). All 10 patients with SJVCS experienced venous pressure elevation during contralateral neck turning (mean [SD] pressure, 4.29 [2.50] cm H2O). All 10 patients with SJVCS underwent transcervical microsurgical decompression, and 9 experienced postoperative improvement or resolution of symptoms. One patient had transient postoperative dysphagia and facial drooping, and another patient reported jaw numbness. CONCLUSION: SJVCS is a novel clinical entity causing IIH. Patients should be evaluated with dynamic venography with manometry. Surgical decompression with removal of osseous overgrowth is an effective treatment in select patients.

Far-lateral Vascularized Rib Graft for Cervical and Lumbar Spinal Arthrodesis: Cadaveric Technique Description.

BACKGROUND: Rotational vascularized autografts are ideal for achieving spinal arthrodesis because they maintain bony vascularization while avoiding the morbidity and challenges of free-tissue transfer. Although proximal ribs are ideal candidates for vascularized bone grafts, their use is restricted to the thoracic spine. This study describes a novel technique for harvesting lateral rib grafts on an intercostal pedicle for use in cervical and lumbar posterolateral arthrodesis. METHODS: Six cadaveric dissections were performed (2 included upper and all 6 included lower rib dissections). Measurements included graft width and thickness, distance reached from harvest level to the top of the graft, and ipsilateral and contralateral spine levels reached by the graft. RESULTS: Overall, 60 lateral rib grafts were harvested. Intercostal vessel pedicles were torn during harvest in 4/48 (8.3%) of the lower rib and 5/12 (41.7%) of the upper rib grafts. Mean measurements of successful upper rib grafts were 1.4 ± 0.12 cm × 0.5 ± 0.15 cm (width × thickness), 14.1 ± 2.79 cm (distance) reached, and C2 (occiput-C4) reached ipsilaterally and C3 (occiput-C5) reached contralaterally. Mean lower rib graft measurements were 1.4 ± 0.26 cm × 0.4 ± 0.15 cm (width × thickness), 18.0 ± 6.19 cm (distance), S1 (L1-S2) reached ipsilaterally, and L4 (L1-S1) reached contralaterally. CONCLUSIONS: It is technically feasible to rotate a far-lateral rib graft on an intercostal pedicle into the posterolateral cervical or lumbar spine for the augmentation of arthrodesis. Upper ribs seem to be more difficult to harvest and rotate while keeping the intercostal pedicle intact than lower ribs.

Retrospective Multicenter Assessment of Rod Fracture After Anterior Column Realignment in Minimally Invasive Adult Spinal Deformity Correction.

BACKGROUND: Anterior column realignment (ACR) was developed as a minimally invasive method for treating sagittal imbalance. However, rod fracture (RF) rates associated with ACR are not known. Our objective was to assess the rate of and risk factors for RF following ACR in deformity correction surgery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter review of patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) who underwent ACR for deformity correction. ASD was defined as coronal Cobb angle ≥20°, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis >10°, sagittal vertical axis ≥5 cm, pelvic tilt ≥25°, or thoracic kyphosis ≥60°. Inclusion criteria were ASD, age >18 years, use of ACR, and development of RF or full radiographs obtained at least 1 year after surgery that did not demonstrate RF. RESULTS: Ninety patients were identified, with mean follow-up of 2.3 ± 1.4 years (age, 64.1 ± 9.4; 54 [60%] women). The most common ACR location was L3/4 (42 cases; 47%). Mean fusion length was 7.5 ± 3.6 levels. Four (4.4%) of 90 patients developed RF within 12 months of surgery. RF occurred adjacent to ACR in all cases; RF was not associated with focal correction (P = 0.49), rod material (P = 0.8), degree of correction (P > 0.07), or interbody at L5/S1 (P = 0.06). RF was associated with longer fusion constructs in univariate (P = 0.002) and multivariate (P = 0.03) analyses. CONCLUSIONS: RF occurred in 4.4% of patients with ASD who underwent ACR with a minimum of 1-year follow-up. RF was not associated with focal correction but appears to be associated with global correction and extent of fixation.

Supplemental rods are needed to maximally reduce rod strain across the lumbosacral junction with TLIF but not ALIF in long constructs.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Rod fracture at the lumbosacral (LS) junction remains challenging in long segment fusions and likely stems from increased LS strain. Reduction of LS instrumentation strain may help reduce fracture rates. PURPOSE: The goal of this investigation was to assess the effect of supplemental posterior 4-rod (4R) construction on LS stability and rod strain compared with standard 2-rod (2R) construction in a long segment fusion model. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Cadaveric biomechanical study. OUTCOME MEASURES: Range of motion (ROM), rod strain, and sacral screw (SS) bending moments during flexion, extension, compression, lateral bending, and axial rotation. METHODS: Standard nondestructive flexibility tests (7.5 Nm) were performed on 14 cadaveric specimens (L1-ilium) to assess ROM stability, rod strain, and SS bending moment of a supplemental 4R construction versus standard 2R construction. Specimens were equally divided into L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) or L5-S1 transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) groups. Three conditions were tested in each group: (1) no lumbar interbody fusion (No LIF)+2R, (2) ALIF or TLIF+2R, and (3) ALIF or TLIF+4R. Data were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) or ANOVA. RESULTS: No differences were observed between groups 1 and 2 for age, sex, bone mineral density, or baseline ROM (p>.09). Overall, TLIF+2R demonstrated greater ROM than ALIF+4R in extension (p=003), with greater rod strain in flexion, extension, and compression (p<.001), and greater SS in compression and AR (p<.04). Compared with TLIF+2R, TLIF+4R resulted in reduced rod strain in flexion, extension, compression, and LB (p<.04), as well as SS in AR (p<.001). The TLIF+4R yielded biomechanics comparable to ALIF+2R in ROM and rod strain but SS inflexion, extension, compression, and AR remained elevated (p<001). The ALIF+4R did not significantly improve ROM, rod strain, or SS (p>.11). CONCLUSIONS: The use of ALIF and adding accessory rods with TLIF significantly reduced LS rod strain in a long segment cadaveric model with iliac fixation. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Reducing strain could decrease the risk of failure associated with long segment fixation.

Operative Management of Idiopathic Spinal Cord Herniation: Case Series and Novel Technique for Repair of Recurrent Herniation.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic spinal cord herniation (ISCH) is a rare pathology of the spine defined by herniation of the spinal cord through a dural defect. OBJECTIVE: To highlight the operative management of ISCH and the surgical nuances of ISCH repairs conducted at our institution. METHODS: This retrospective review examines consecutive patients with ISCH who were treated surgically between January 1, 2010, and July 31, 2017, at Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona. RESULTS: Four patients with ISCH presented with thoracic myelopathy and lower extremity weakness during the study period. Treatment consisted of reduction of the herniated spinal cord and filling of the dural defect with a collagen-based dural regeneration matrix. In 3 patients the dural edges were covered with a collagen-matrix intradural sling, and in 1 patient they were repaired primarily with interrupted sutures. Three of the 4 patients experienced improvement in myelopathic symptoms; the fourth patient suffered neurological decline in the immediate postoperative period. CONCLUSION: ISCH is a complex pathological condition likely to result in progressive myelopathy. Surgery offers patients the possibility of stabilizing the progression of the spinal cord dysfunction and perhaps restoring neurological function. However, extreme care must be taken during surgery to minimize manipulation of the fragile herniated cord.

Posterior open-wedge anterior longitudinal ligament release: Cadaveric technique analysis.

Anterior column release is a powerful surgical technique for achieving spinopelvic balance in adult patients with sagittal plane deformities. We present an alternative strategy for focal deformity correction from a posterior-only approach. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a novel surgical technique called posterior open-wedge diskectomy and anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL) release (POWAR). A cadaveric torso underwent POWARs at the L1-L4 intervertebral disc spaces. Baseline measurements of end-plate angle (EPA), anterior intervertebral disc height (ADH), and posterior intervertebral disc height (PDH) were obtained. These measurements were repeated after three stages of correction: posterior column compression alone, posterior column compression following Schwab grade 2 osteotomies, and posterior column compression following POWAR. A second cadaver underwent posterolateral spinal dissection to demonstrate the pertinent anatomical features relevant to this novel procedure. With each stage of correction, a sequential increase in EPA and ADH and a decrease in PDH were demonstrated. The large increase in ADH seen following POWAR confirmed successful release of the ALL. In situ investigation of the aorta and inferior vena cava following anterior exposure revealed no injury to the great vessels or surrounding structures. Ex vivo testing of the aorta and inferior vena cava took place at the L3-4 level. This testing demonstrated no injury or tears to either vessel. POWAR is a new surgical technique that can provide an alternative to three-column osteotomy for surgeons performing spinal reconstructions in adults through an open, posterior-only approach. Clin. Anat. 32:348-353, 2019. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Iliac screws may not be necessary in long-segment constructs with L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion: cadaveric study of stability and instrumentation strain.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Lumbosacral pseudoarthrosis and instrumentation failure is common with long-segment constructs. Optimizing lumbosacral construct biomechanics may help to reduce failure rates. The influence of iliac screws and interbody type on range of motion (ROM), rod strain (RS), sacral screw strain (SS) is not well-established. PURPOSE: Investigate the effects of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), and iliac screws on long-segment lumbosacral construct biomechanics. STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Fourteen human cadaveric spine specimens. OUTCOME MEASURES: Lumbosacral ROM, RS, and SS. METHODS: Specimens were potted at L1 and the ilium. Specimens were equally divided into either an L5-S1 ALIF or TLIF group and underwent testing in the following conditions: (1) intact (2) L2-S1 pedicle screw rod fixation (PSR-S) (3) L2-ilium (PSR-I) (4) PSR-S+ALIF (ALIF-S) or TLIF (TLIF-S) (5) PSR-I + ALIF (ALIF-I) or TLIF (TLIF-I). Pure moment bending (7.5 Nm) in flexion, extension, lateral bending, axial rotation, and compressive loads (400N) were applied and ROM, SS, and RS were measured. Comparisons were performed using a one-way ANOVA (p<.05). RESULTS: ALIF-S and TLIF-S provided similar decreases in ROM as TLIF-I (p>.05). Compared to PSR-S, PSR-I significantly decreased SS during bending in all directions (p<.02) but increased RS in flexion and extension (p≤.02). Anterior lumbar interbody fusion-S provided similar decreases in SS as TLIF-I in all directions (p>.40) but had significantly less RS than TLIF-I in flexion, extension, compression (p<.01). TLIF-S had more SS than TLIF-I in flexion, extension, axial rotation (p<.02), while TLIF-S had less RS only in flexion (p=.03). Compared to PSR-I, ALIF-I decreased the RS (p<.02) but TLIF-I did not (p>.67). CONCLUSIONS: Iliac screws were protective of SS but increased RS at the lumbosacral junction. Constructs with ALIF and no iliac screws result in comparable SS as constructs with TLIF and iliac screws with significantly reduced RS. If iliac screws are utilized, ALIF but not TLIF reduces the iliac screw-induced RS. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: There is a relatively high incidence of lumbosacral instrumentation failure in adult spinal deformity. Optimizing lumbosacral construct biomechanics may help to reduce failure rates. Iliac screws induce lumbosacral rod strain and may be responsible for instrumentation failure. Constructs with lumbosacral ALIF reduce iliac-screw induced rod strain and may obviate the need for fixation to the ilium.

Disc Geometry is an Accurate Predictor of Lordotic Correction in the Thoracolumbar Spine Following Schwab Grade 2 Osteotomy: A Cadaveric Study and Biomechanical Analysis of Disc Space Changes Following Lordotic Correction.

BACKGROUND: Posterior column osteotomy (PCO) is a powerful technique for correcting lordosis, but the surgical literature lacks objective evidence on preoperative predictors of achievable lordotic correction following PCO. OBJECTIVE: To measure the correlation between disc geometry and achievable lordotic correction following Schwab grade 2 osteotomies and to describe geometric changes to disc space following lordotic correction. METHODS: Schwab grade 2 osteotomies were performed from T1 to S1 in 5 cadavers. Lateral radiographs were taken before and after posterior column compression. Anterior disc height (ADH), middle disc height (MDH), posterior disc height (PDH), and lordotic angles were measured. The association between disc height and lordotic correction was analyzed using linear regression. RESULTS: For all spinal levels (n = 79), PDH was most strongly correlated with lordotic correction (r = 0.72, P < .001). Regional subset analyses showed the strongest correlation between PDH and lordotic correction achievable within the lumbar spine (n = 22, r = 0.77, P < .001), followed by ADH for lower thoracic spine (n = 29, r = 0.65, P < .001) and PDH for upper thoracic spine (n = 28, r = 0.61, P = .001). Postcorrection analysis of disc heights revealed that as lordotic correction increases, the PDH decreases, and the ADH expands. CONCLUSION: PDH is a strong predictor of achievable lordotic correction following Schwab grade 2 osteotomies and compression of an intact disc space. In the lumbar spine, 50% of lordotic change is predictable using PDH alone. Further testing of our linear regression equation is planned for prospective clinical studies, and further testing of postcorrection disc space geometry is planned for future biomechanical and surgical technique studies.

Transpsoas Approach Nuances.

The transpsoas approach is a powerful tool in correcting adult spinal deformity secondary to the degenerative process. It may be used as a stand-alone construct or in combination with other approaches to correct both coronal and sagittal malalignment. Preoperative planning with careful analysis of full-length 36-in radiographs and an MRI of the lumbar spine is essential in determining the safety and feasibility of this approach. Ultimately the goals of deformity correction must be achieved, and lateral lumbar interbody fusion is a valuable tool that can aid in achieving these goals while minimizing perioperative morbidity.