Factors that affect in vitro measurement of the susceptibility of herpes simplex virus to nucleoside analogues.

OBJECTIVES: To identify factors that contribute to variability of HSV antiviral susceptibility breakpoints. METHODS: Acyclovir and penciclovir IC(50)'s for 12 HSV clinical isolates were measured in two laboratories using plaque reduction assay (PRA), an enzyme immunoassay (EIA)-based antigen reduction, and DNA hybridization on Vero, A549, MRC-5, HEL299 and HELG monolayers. Pair-wise comparisons were performed to evaluate variables including testing laboratory, technique, monolayer, and antiviral. The proportion of false results was analyzed using a conventional susceptibility IC(50) breakpoint of 2 microg/ml. RESULTS: Acyclovir-resistant HSV isolates were correctly identified by all methods. In contrast, there were 6-67% of susceptible isolates incorrectly characterized as drug-resistant. Variables associated with these errors included testing site, assay method, cell line and antiviral. A549, DNA hybridization, and penciclovir were associated with the highest IC(50)'s, whereas the PRA, EIA, and human fibroblast-monolayers provided the best differentiation between susceptible and resistant HSV isolates. CONCLUSIONS: The current recommendations to use a single discriminating value to define HSV resistance to nucleoside analogues can be problematic. False results are influenced in various degrees by the laboratory method, tissue culture and antivirals.

Resistance of herpes simplex virus infections to nucleoside analogues in HIV-infected patients.

Antiviral treatment of herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections with nucleoside analogues has been well established for >2 decades, but isolation of drug-resistant HSV from immunocompetent patients has remained infrequent (0.1%-0.7% of isolates) during this period. Even when drug-resistant HSV is isolated from an immunocompetent patient, this virus, with rare exceptions, is cleared normally without adverse clinical outcome. Although drug-resistant HSV is more commonly isolated from immunocompromised patients (4%-7% of isolates) and is more likely to be clinically significant, the prevalence of drug-resistant HSV even among these patients, has been stable over the past 2 decades. Despite this stable prevalence, disease due to drug-resistant HSV remains an important problem for many immunocompromised patients, including those with HIV infection. This article reviews the prevalence, pathogenesis, and implications of drug-resistant HSV infections in HIV-infected patients.

Herpes simplex virus resistance to acyclovir and penciclovir after two decades of antiviral therapy.

Acyclovir, penciclovir, and their prodrugs have been widely used during the past two decades for the treatment of herpesvirus infections. In spite of the distribution of over 2.3 x 10(6) kg of these nucleoside analogues, the prevalence of acyclovir resistance in herpes simplex virus isolates from immunocompetent hosts has remained stable at approximately 0.3%. In immuncompromised patients, in whom the risk for developing resistance is much greater, the prevalence of resistant virus has also remained stable but at a higher level, typically 4 to 7%. These observations are examined in the light of characteristics of the virus, the drugs, and host factors.

Assessing the contribution of the herpes simplex virus DNA polymerase to spontaneous mutations.

BACKGROUND: The thymidine kinase (tk) mutagenesis assay is often utilized to determine the frequency of herpes simplex virus (HSV) replication-mediated mutations. Using this assay, clinical and laboratory HSV-2 isolates were shown to have a 10- to 80-fold higher frequency of spontaneous mutations compared to HSV-1. METHODS: A panel of HSV-1 and HSV-2, along with polymerase-recombinant viruses expressing type 2 polymerase (Pol) within a type 1 genome, were evaluated using the tk and non-HSV DNA mutagenesis assays to measure HSV replication-dependent errors and determine whether the higher mutation frequency of HSV-2 is a distinct property of type 2 polymerases. RESULTS: Although HSV-2 have mutation frequencies higher than HSV-1 in the tk assay, these errors are assay-specific. In fact, wild type HSV-1 and the antimutator HSV-1 PAAr5 exhibited a 2-4 fold higher frequency than HSV-2 in the non-HSV DNA mutatagenesis assay. Furthermore, regardless of assay, HSV-1 recombinants expressing HSV-2 Pol had error rates similar to HSV-1, whereas the high mutator virus, HSV-2 6757, consistently showed significant errors. Additionally, plasmid DNA containing the HSV-2 tk gene, but not type 1 tk or LacZ DNA, was shown to form an anisomorphic DNA structure. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the Pol is not solely responsible for the virus-type specific differences in mutation frequency. Accordingly, it is possible that (a) mutations may be modulated by other viral polypeptides cooperating with Pol, and (b) the localized secondary structure of the viral genome may partially account for the apparently enhanced error frequency of HSV-2.

Susceptibilities of herpes simplex viruses to penciclovir and acyclovir in eight cell lines.

The commonly used antiviral drugs acyclovir (ACV) and penciclovir (PCV) possess similarly potent antiviral activities in vivo against herpes simplex virus (HSV). Assay methods for sensitivity to ACV are not necessarily transferable to PCV, even though the two drugs have similar in vivo potencies and mechanisms of action. We determined by plaque reduction assay the relative activities of ACV and PCV against five laboratory-adapted strains of HSV types 1 and 2 (including sensitive and resistant strains) in seven human cell lines and one nonhuman primate cell line. Seven characteristics were used to evaluate the cell lines. All cell lines were similar in their plating efficiencies and abilities to discriminate between sensitive and resistant HSV isolates. Vero and MRC-5 cells yielded the most discordant 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC50s) for the two HSV types, while Vero and WI-38 VA-13 cells yielded large differences in the IC50s of ACV and PCV. The limited life spans and poor plaque morphologies of the fibroblast lines were undesirable characteristics. Among the transformed cell lines producing well-defined plaques, A549 cells provided the best concordance between IC50s for the two HSV types and two antiherpes drugs. Comparison experiments with a yield reduction format indicated that the use of assays of this type might allow some of the cell-specific properties observed in plaque reduction assays to be avoided.

Comparison of methods for identifying resistant herpes simplex virus and measuring antiviral susceptibility.

BACKGROUND: A number of in vitro assays are used to determine susceptibility of HSV to antiviral agents, but results from these in vitro assays do not necessarily correlate with treatment outcome. OBJECTIVES: A method with improved capability for identifying an isolate as acyclovir (ACV) or penciclovir (PCV) resistant when resistance is borderline could greatly improve the management of HSV disease. STUDY DESIGN: A comparative evaluation of four in vitro assays, plaque reduction (PRA), DNA hybridization, plating efficiency (PEA) and plaque autoradiography (PAR) was performed to accurately identify and measure resistance of a TK-altered clinical HSV isolate (HSV-1 N4) from a patient who was non-responsive to ACV treatment. Two established criteria for the prediction of antiviral resistance, IC(50)> or =2.0 microg/ml or an IC(50) greater than 10x above a sensitive virus IC(50), as well as testing in human (MRC-5) and nonhuman (Vero and CV-1 monkey kidney) cell lines were evaluated. RESULTS: The PRA and DNA hybridization assays accurately identified HSV-1 N4 as ACV(r) in human cells when using the 10x above sensitive virus IC(50) resistance criterion. Moreover, the PEA and PAR assays failed to classify HSV-1 N4 as drug resistant and indicate that these technologies alone are inadequate for identifying resistant virus. CONCLUSIONS: The data presented herein indicate that the PRA and DNA hybridization assays most accurately identified an otherwise borderline-resistant isolate as drug resistant: (i) when a sensitive virus is used within each individual assay as a control, (ii) when ACV and PCV susceptibility is evaluated in human cells, and (iii) when the 10x above sensitive IC(50) criterion is used to classify a virus as drug-resistant. Testing of additional clinical samples is warranted to further confirm these findings.