Regional variation in health care substitution for intrauterine device insertion: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Rising health care costs are a major concern in most Western countries. The substitution of healthcare stands as a strategic approach aimed at mitigating costs while offering medical services in proximity to patients' residences. An illustrative instance involves the migration of outpatient hospital care to primary care settings. Notably, the insertion of intrauterine devices (IUDs) can be safely executed within primary care contexts. In order to establish a pragmatic objective for the rate of IUD substitution, we conducted an evaluation of regional disparities in healthcare substitution pertaining to the insertion of intrauterine devices. Furthermore, we investigated disparities in the follow-up ultrasound and reinsertion of IUDs between primary and secondary healthcare environments. METHODS: All women who underwent IUD insertion in Dutch primary care (by general practitioners and midwives) and secondary care (by hospital physicians) between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2020 were included. The main outcome measures were the case-mix adjusted IUD insertion rates at the regional level by care setting and the proportions requiring follow-up ultrasound and IUD reinsertion within three months. RESULTS: Of the 840,766 IUD placements, 74% were inserted in primary care and 26% in secondary care. The proportion inserted in primary care increased from 70% in 2016 to 77% in 2020. The observed substitution rate ranged from 58 to 82% between regions. Compared with health care professionals in primary care, those in secondary care performed more ultrasounds to verify IUD placement (23% vs. 3%; p-value < 0.01) and more IUD reinsertions within three months (6% vs. 2%; p-value < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: IUDs are increasingly being inserted in Dutch primary care, with peak regional IUD insertion care substitution rates at ≥ 80%. IUD insertion care substitution to primary care appears to be associated with significantly fewer women having follow-up ultrasound or IUD reinsertion within three months.

An in-vivo study of the safety of copper-containing intrauterine devices in 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to prospectively evaluate whether women with copper-containing intrauterine devices (Cu-IUD), currently listed as MR conditional, can safely undergo 3.0 Tesla (3 T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: 73 women, age 18-54 years old, with a Cu-IUD who were undergoing MRI for any reason were included consecutively. Pre- and post-MRI standard pelvic ultrasound examinations were completed to determine the appropriate pre- and post-MRI positioning of the Cu-IUD. Displaced IUDs were defined by IUD crossbars not in the fundal portion of the endometrial cavity, a visualized tip in the mid or lower uterus, any part of the device located in the cervical canal or outside of the endometrial canal, a fractured device, or a non-visualized IUD. Additionally, a questionnaire was completed by participants to determine the level of pre- and post-MRI pelvic pain. RESULTS: There were zero observed displaced Cu-IUDs on post-MRI pelvic ultrasounds (p = 0/70, 95% CI 0, .043). Three participants were dropped from the study due to malpositioned IUDs on pre-MRI pelvic ultrasound. Six patients reported new or worsening pelvic pain/discomfort during or after their MRI examination. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that performing 3 T MRI using a low SAR setting does not cause displacement of Cu-IUDs, with zero out of 70 patients demonstrating IUD displacement.

Intrauterine device (IUD) embedded in bladder wall with calculus formation treated with cystoscopy: a case report.

In the realm of unusual gynecological complications, the displacement of an intrauterine device (IUD) into the bladder, resulting in stone formation, stands out as an exceptionally rare and perplexing condition. Such occurrences challenge diagnostic and therapeutic protocols, often leading to unique case studies that expand our understanding of IUD-related complications. We present an interesting case of a 50-year-old woman with a stone-forming ectopic IUD in the bladder diagnosed with imaging modalities and treated with cystoscopy, with a subsequent resolution of symptoms. This case underscores the importance of considering ectopic IUD placement in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with urinary symptoms and a history of IUD use. Moreover, it emphasizes the role of imaging in the accurate diagnosis of such cases and highlights cystoscopy as an effective treatment modality for the removal of IUD and stones.

Cystoscopic Management of the Intravesical Migration of an Intrauterine Device Complicated by Bladder Stone Formation: A Video Case Report.

Intrauterine device (IUD) migration is a rare complication of IUD placement. The current case is of a 32-year-old lady who presented with pregnancy following IUD failure. Subsequent imaging revealed intravesical migration of the IUD. A cystoscopic evaluation revealed a bladder stone (encrusted IUD), with no breach in the bladder mucosa and no evidence of a fistulous opening. The encrustation was broken down, and an intact IUD was retrieved. This video report shows the management of a migrated IUD complicated by a bladder stone using cystoscopy that not only allowed for a combined diagnostic and therapeutic approach to the extraction of the IUD but also provided information regarding the involvement of the bladder wall and confirmed no extravesical protrusion of the device.

Social Determinants of Health and Patient-Reported Difficult Discontinuation of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception.

Background: Some individuals who receive long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) face barriers to discontinuation. The inability to discontinue a contraceptive method when desired negatively impacts a person's reproductive autonomy. Persons impacted by social determinants of health (SDH) may be disproportionately affected. The objective of this study is to evaluate the association of SDH with patient-reported difficult LARC discontinuation. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis of data from the 2017-2019 cycle of the National Survey of Family Growth was conducted. The main outcome was patient-reported difficulty discontinuing a LARC method (intrauterine device or implant) in the last 10 years. Descriptive statistics were used to identify demographic characteristics and SDH domains. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate associations across SDH domains with difficult LARC removal. Results: A total of 754 respondents reported wanting to have their LARC removed, and 105 (11%) reported difficulty discontinuing LARC methods. One-third of respondents experienced one or more SDH, notably food insecurity (26%) or transportation barriers (30%). After adjusting for age, race, education, geographic location, parity, and body mass index (BMI), persons with one or more SDH had an increased adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for difficultly discontinuing LARCs compared with respondents without any SDH (2.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.21, 3.69). Transportation barriers demonstrated the largest aOR of 2.90 (95% CI: 1.07, 7.87). Conclusions: SDH are associated with challenges to LARC discontinuation. SDH are unique risk factors that can impact one's entire contraceptive experience. A nuanced discussion of SDH at the time of contraceptive counseling may be a critical step in addressing the intersectionality of method selection and reproductive agency.

Advancing Pain Management Protocols for Intrauterine Device Insertion: Integrating Evidence-Based Strategies Into Clinical Practice.

The discomfort and anxiety associated with the intrauterine device (IUD) insertion process is a significant barrier to its adoption as a form of contraception despite its high efficacy. This study aimed to classify and identify methods for minimizing pain and anxiety in IUD implantation in women below the age of 49. A search of publications from online databases, PubMed and Google Scholar, revealed 14 articles that met the inclusion criteria. An analysis of the selected studies showed that several pharmacological and non-pharmacological measures effectively minimized patient discomfort associated with IUD insertion. Of the 14 studies, 12 evaluated pharmacological methods for pain management in IUD insertion, while two studies assessed non-pharmacological methods. The results showed that although the IUD is more effective than other forms of contraceptives, fear of pain related to the insertion process is one of the most significant barriers to the use of an IUD among women. Most studies identified pharmacological methods of pain management for IUD insertion, highlighting a need for more research on non-pharmacological methods to improve patient experiences and reduce associated fears.

Prospective evaluation of ease and difficulties of 872 cases of IUD removals.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to describe the ease and difficulty of removing intrauterine devices (IUDs). METHODS: We conducted a prospective study at the University of XXX, Faculty of Medical Sciences, XXXX. We included women who requested IUD removal. We excluded women with partial IUD expulsion in which the IUD was protruded at the external os. We identified difficult IUD removal when the removal was challenging, including the inability to visualize IUD strings extending from the cervical os. RESULTS: A total of 869 women participated. Women were aged 29.4 ± 8.0 years (mean ± SD; range 14-51) and the duration of IUD use at the time of removal was 4.3 ± 4.2 years. We found that 702 (80.8%) women had visible strings at the external os and the removals were performed at the first attempt without difficulty in 692 (79.6%) participants. Pain was more intense (>4) in cases of difficult removals. After multivariate logistic analysis, difficult removals were associated with users of IUD > 3 years (3 times higher risk); for each previous cesarean delivery, the risk increased by 1.5 times. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that IUD removal is an easy and safe procedure, with only a small proportion of women reporting significant pain with IUD removal.

Comprehensive Evaluation of a Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device (LNG-IUD), Metformin, and Liraglutide for Fertility Preservation in Endometrial Cancer: Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Endometrial cancer is a leading gynecological malignancy, with obesity being a significant risk factor due to increased estrogen production in body fat. Current treatments often involve hysterectomy, which precludes fertility, thus highlighting the need for fertility-preserving options. This study aims to evaluate the combined efficacy of a levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LNG-IUD), metformin, and liraglutide for treating women with endometrial hyperplasia or early stage endometrial cancer while preserving fertility. The study will enroll 264 women aged 18-45 with a BMI > 30 who desire uterine preservation. Participants will be randomized into three groups: LNG-IUD alone, LNG-IUD plus metformin, and LNG-IUD plus metformin and liraglutide. Primary outcomes will include complete pathological remission, while secondary outcomes will assess histological changes, glucose, insulin levels, and weight changes over a 12-month period. This study protocol hypothesizes that LNG-IUD combined with metformin and liraglutide may potentially lead to higher regression rates of endometrial hyperplasia (EH) and early stage endometrial cancer (EC) compared to LNG-IUD alone. Furthermore, the protocol anticipates that these combination therapies will demonstrate good tolerability with minimal adverse effects, suggesting the potential benefit of integrating metabolic interventions with LNG-IUD to enhance treatment efficacy while preserving fertility in women with EH and EC.

[Risks of urogenital infections and expulsion associated with the combination of an IUD and a menstrual cup]. / Étude RIESC : risques d'infections uro-génitales et d'expulsion dans l'association stérilet et coupe menstruelle.

OBJECTIVES: The increase in intrauterine devices (IUDs) contraception, and the growing use of reusables menstrual hygiene products such as the menstrual cup, necessitates an assessment of the implications of their co-use. The objectives are to assess whether women with IUDs who use menstrual cups have an increased risk of IUD expulsion and/or a change in the risk of upper and lower urogenital tract infections compared to women who use other menstrual hygiene products. METHOD: An observational, prospective, multicenter study was conducted in France between 2020 and 2023. Participants were recruited by health professionals and data were collected by telephone questionnaire at the time of IUD insertion and at one year. The primary endpoints were the occurrence of IUD expulsion and the occurrence of urogenital tract infections in menstrual cup users compared to non-users. RESULTS: One hundred and three women out of 119 included were analyzed, 25 of them were regular menstrual cup users and five experienced IUD expulsion. Among regular users, 12% experienced IUD expulsion compared to 2.6% among non-users, with no statistically significant difference (Chi2=3.65; P=0.056). Regarding urogenital tract infections, nine women (36%) of the regular menstrual cup users had urogenital infections, compared with 27 (34.6%) of the non-users or not regular users, with no statistically significant difference. CONCLUSION: The tendency of menstrual cup users to expel their IUDs is a reason for caution, although it is not sufficient to contraindicate co-use. Physicians should therefore systematically screen such co-use and inform patients of the risks and monitoring instructions.

Contraceptive Use Measured in a National Population-Based Approach: Cross-Sectional Study of Administrative Versus Survey Data.

BACKGROUND: Prescribed contraception is used worldwide by over 400 million women of reproductive age. Monitoring contraceptive use is a major public health issue that usually relies on population-based surveys. However, these surveys are conducted on average every 6 years and do not allow close follow-up of contraceptive use. Moreover, their sample size is often too limited for the study of specific population subgroups such as people with low income. Health administrative data could be an innovative and less costly source to study contraceptive use. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to explore the potential of health administrative data to study prescribed contraceptive use and compare these data with observations based on survey data. METHODS: We selected all women aged 15-49 years, covered by French health insurance and living in France, in the health administrative database, which covers 98% of the resident population (n=14,788,124), and in the last French population-based representative survey, the Health Barometer Survey, conducted in 2016 (n=4285). In health administrative data, contraceptive use was recorded with detailed information on the product delivered, whereas in the survey, it was self-declared by the women. In both sources, the prevalence of contraceptive use was estimated globally for all prescribed contraceptives and by type of contraceptive: oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices (IUDs), and implants. Prevalences were analyzed by age. RESULTS: There were more low-income women in health administrative data than in the population-based survey (1,576,066/14,770,256, 11% vs 188/4285, 7%, respectively; P<.001). In health administrative data, 47.6% (7034,710/14,770,256; 95% CI 47.6%-47.7%) of women aged 15-49 years used a prescribed contraceptive versus 50.5% (2297/4285; 95% CI 49.1%-52.0%) in the population-based survey. Considering prevalences by the type of contraceptive in health administrative data versus survey data, they were 26.9% (95% CI 26.9%-26.9%) versus 27.7% (95% CI 26.4%-29.0%) for oral contraceptives, 17.7% (95% CI 17.7%-17.8%) versus 19.6% (95% CI 18.5%-20.8%) for IUDs, and 3% (95% CI 3.0%-3.0%) versus 3.2% (95% CI 2.7%-3.7%) for implants. In both sources, the same overall tendency in prevalence was observed for these 3 contraceptives. Implants remained little used at all ages, oral contraceptives were highly used among young women, whereas IUD use was low among young women. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with survey data, health administrative data exhibited the same overall tendencies for oral contraceptives, IUDs, and implants. One of the main strengths of health administrative data is the high quality of information on contraceptive use and the large number of observations, allowing studies of subgroups of population. Health administrative data therefore appear as a promising new source to monitor contraception in a population-based approach. They could open new perspectives for research and be a valuable new asset to guide public policies on reproductive and sexual health.

A Displaced Intrauterine Device Eroding Into the Sigmoid Colon.

A 36-year-old female presented to the gynecology office eight weeks after the placement of a ParaGard intrauterine device (IUD). Upon gynecologic examination, the strings of the IUD were not found. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed which reported the IUD embedded in the sigmoid colon. Initial diagnostic laparoscopy was done without bowel preparation and revealed an IUD embedded within the sigmoid colon and mesocolon. Colonoscopy did not reveal any breach of the colonic lumen. A second diagnostic laparoscopy was planned with the robotic-assisted technique after bowel preparation. Intraoperative findings during the second operation identified the IUD embedded in the antimesenteric side of the sigmoid colon with surrounding scar tissue to the uterus. The IUD was sharply freed using robotic scissors and the resulting serosal defect was sutured in layers with buttress made of appendices epiploica. The patient recovered well and had an excellent outcome. Our article highlights the minimally invasive method of dealing with a displaced IUD. The use of the robotic technique was helpful in our case to achieve an excellent outcome.

The association of insertion methods on immediate postpartum intrauterine device expulsion rates: A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the method of immediate postpartum IUD (ppIUD) insertion (manual versus ring forceps) and expulsion rate within 6-week postpartum. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who had a singleton vaginal delivery and an immediate ppIUD inserted at Rush University from January 2014 to September 2023. The primary outcome was rate of expulsion within 6-week postpartum. We compared the rate of expulsion by method of insertion, either using a manual technique versus using ring forceps. We performed univariable analysis for the association between baseline maternal characteristics and the primary outcome and we performed multivariable logistic regression to determine the independent association of the method of insertion and the primary outcome. RESULTS: Two hundred nineteen patients met eligibility with 117 immediate ppIUDs inserted manually and 102 inserted with ring forceps. Baseline maternal demographics were similar across study groups. After adjusting for factors selected a priori (estimated blood loss, body mass index, gestational age at delivery, nulliparity, type of IUD), use of ring forceps was more likely to result in expulsion compared to manual insertion (30.4% vs 16.2% respectively; adjusted OR 2.49, 95% confidence interval 1.28-4.90). CONCLUSION: In this retrospective analysis, insertion of immediate ppIUD with ring forceps was independently associated with an increased rate of expulsion within 6 weeks postpartum when compared to manual insertion. IMPLICATIONS: In this setting, ring forceps was associated with high rates of immediate postpartum IUD expulsion compared to manual technique. Studies disagree, suggesting need for additional work.

Taking matters into our own hands? Hierarchies of power and knowledge in online framings of IUD self-removal.

This article examines how intrauterine device (IUD) self-removal is framed in online sources containing the views of contraceptive providers. While research has explored power and knowledge hierarchies in clinical interactions between contraceptive users and providers, and has highlighted the safety of IUD self-removal, little is known about how self-removal is represented by providers in accessible online sources that may be relied upon by contraceptive users for information. A discourse analysis of 42 provider-generated online sources found that provider authority over contraception is reinforced through biomedical constructions of risk and safety in framings of self-removal. The data reveal how the sharing of self-removal experiences between IUD users via online platforms was perceived to threaten contraceptive provider expertise, resulting in the dismissal of users' experiential knowledge. While some sources were supportive, the framings of self-removal discussed in this paper typically mirror the unequal power relations of in-person contraceptive user/provider interactions. The sources analysed therefore demonstrate how power and knowledge hierarchies are reproduced and extend beyond clinical interactions to the digital context, reflecting broader socio-structural controls over bodies, knowledge, and reproductive decision-making.

How have changes in accessibility and public funding influenced contraceptive use among Norwegian adolescents? A cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: The Norwegian Government introduced in 2002 a reimbursement scheme for hormonal contraceptives to adolescents at the same time as public health nurses and midwives received authorization to prescribe hormonal contraceptives. This study examines the impact of increased accessibility and public funding on hormonal contraceptive use among adolescents. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The Norwegian Prescription Database, Statistics Norway, and Norwegian Institute of Public Health served as data sources for this cohort study. The study population comprised 174 653 Norwegian women born 1989-1990, 1994-1995, and 1999-2000. We examined use of hormonal contraceptives through dispensed prescriptions from age 12 through age 19 with duration of first continuous use as primary outcome. The statistical analyses were done in SPSS using chi-squared test, survival analysis, and Joinpoint regression analysis with p-values < 0.05. RESULTS: By age 19, ~75% of the cohorts had used at least one hormonal method. The main providers of the first prescription were general practitioners and public health nurses. Starters of progestogen-only pills (POPs) have increased across the cohorts, while starters of combined oral contraceptives (COCs) have decreased. The use of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) has increased since its inclusion in the reimbursement scheme (2015). Most switchers shifted from COCs or POPs as a start method to implants after LARCs became part of the reimbursement scheme. There has been a significant increase across the cohorts in the number of women who continuously used hormonal contraceptives from start to the end of the calendar year they became 19 years with the same method and after switching methods. We could not correlate changes in decreasing trends for teenage births or induced abortions (Joinpoint analysis) to time for implementation or changes in the reimbursement of hormonal contraceptives from 2002. CONCLUSIONS: Primarily public health nurses and to a lesser extent midwives became soon after they received authorization to prescribe COCs important providers. The expansion of the reimbursement scheme to cover POPs, patches, vaginal ring, and depot medroxyprogesterone acetate in 2006 had minor impact on increasing the proportion of long-term first-time users. However, the inclusion of LARCs in 2015 significantly increased the proportion of long-term first-time hormonal contraceptive users.

Unintended and ectopic pregnancy in woman with iud translocation with history of two times previous cesarean section and history of spontaneous abortion: Case report.

Intrauterine device is a widely used contraceptive method. However, it may translocate to other sites within the pelvic cavity, including the intestines and the bladder. This contraceptive method has failure rate between 1 and 3 out of 100 women/year. The use of intrauterine device also slightly increases the risk of ectopic pregnancy upon its failure. The combination of intrauterine device translocation and contraceptive failure is rare. We present such a case. A 29-year-old woman (Gravida 4, Para 2) presented with a complaint of abdominal pain and presence of blood spotting over the last 7 h. She tested positive for pregnancy. Upon arrival, her vital signs were normal, but she was moderately obese with a body mass index (BMI) of 38.8 kg/m2. She displayed tenderness during abdominal examination and cervical motion tenderness. Her blood test results showed no significant abnormalities. Abdominal ultrasound revealed a translocated part of intrauterine device to the cervix and transvaginal ultrasound confirmed the presence of a hypoechoic complex structure in the left adnexa, measuring 53 mm, alongside free fluid in Morrison's pouch. An emergency laparotomy was performed, revealing a normal uterus and a ruptured left fallopian tube with approximately 800 cc of blood in the abdomen.

Endoscopic Removal of Intrauterine Contraceptive Device From the Descending Colon: A Case Report.

Intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD) is a popular method of contraception used worldwide. Although successful, it can get dislodged from its primary position and perforate the uterine wall. Migration to the colon is an uncommon complication. The patient's symptoms may mimic that of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), including abdominal pain and changes in bowel movements. The correct diagnosis may be missed for long periods of time, leading to unnecessary suffering and potential complications. It is important for healthcare providers to consider the possibility of intrauterine contraceptive device dislodgement and migration while evaluating patients with a history of IUCD presenting with these symptoms, especially if they have a history of IUCD use. We describe a case where an IUCD was found to be dislodged in the colon and successfully removed through colonoscopy. This case highlights the importance of thorough investigation and follow-up in cases of suspected IUCD migration, as well as the potential for endoscopic removal as a safe and effective method for extracting migrated IUCDs in the bowel.

"My IUD is expiring": A national U.S. mystery client study regarding use of the LNG 52-mg IUD for pregnancy prevention beyond 5 years after multiple FDA extensions.

OBJECTIVES: Since 2020, the Food and Drug Administration has approved multiple extensions to the use of the levonorgestrel (LNG) 52-mg intrauterine device (IUD) for pregnancy prevention beyond 5 years. The accessibility of this information to patients calling a reproductive health clinic to schedule replacement remains unknown. We assess the patient experience in accessing information via phone call on the duration of pregnancy prevention for LNG 52-mg IUD. STUDY DESIGN: We utilized a mystery client study design to inquire about LNG 52-mg IUD use beyond 5 years. Purposeful sampling ensured clinic diversity. RESULTS: In June 2022, 18 (32%) clinics offered extended use beyond 5 years, 25 (44%) recommended replacement at 5 years, and 14 (25%) could not provide information. The number of clinics offering extended LNG 52-mg IUD use did not significantly increase in August 2023 (n = 22, 39%, p = 0.27). CONCLUSIONS: Patients scheduling a replacement of the LNG 52-mg IUD may not receive information about use beyond 5 years. IMPLICATIONS: Reproductive health clinics scheduling staff need further training on updated guidelines.

Intrauterine Device Migration: A Diagnostic and Management Dilemma.

Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are an effective method of contraception, with failure rates comparable to sterilization. In rare cases, IUDs can migrate to other sites, including the bladder, cecum, and fallopian tubes. This case reports a 44-year-old woman who was misdiagnosed with a urachal cyst due to the migration of her IUD into the anterior abdominal wall. A laparoscopic retrieval was successfully performed. To prevent any further serious complications, it is imperative to promptly diagnose and manage migrated IUDs.

Immediate and delayed placement of the intrauterine device after abortion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

This article aims to report the comprehensive and up-to-date analysis and evidence of the insertion rate, expulsion rate, removal rate, and utilization rate of immediate placement of intrauterine devices (IUDs) versus delayed placement after artificial abortion. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wanfang databases were comprehensively searched up to January 12, 2024 for studies that compared immediate versus delayed insertion of IUDs after abortion. The evaluation metrics included the number of IUD insertion after surgical or medical abortions, the frequency of expulsion and removal at 6 months or 1 year, the number of continued usage, pain intensity scores, the number of infections, the duration of bleeding, and instances of uterine perforation during or after IUD insertion. Ten randomized controlled articles were eligible, comprising 11 research projects, of which 3 projects involved the placement of an IUD after surgical abortion, and 8 projects involved the placement of an IUD after medical abortion. This included 2025 patients (977 in the immediate insertion group and 1,048 in the delayed insertion group). We summarized all the extracted evidence. The meta-analysis results indicated that for post-surgical abortions, the immediate insertion group exhibited a higher IUD placement rate than the delayed insertion group. After medical abortions, the immediate insertion group showed higher rates of IUD placement, utilization, and expulsion at 6 months or 1 year. The two groups showed no statistically significant differences in the removal rate, post-insertion infection rate, pain scores during insertion, and days of bleeding during the follow-up period. Compared to delayed placement, immediate insertion of IUDs can not only increase the usage rate at 6 months or 1 year but also enhance the placement rate.

IUD Insertion Under Conscious Sedation: Patient Characteristics with Clinical Decisions.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Uptake of intrauterine devices (IUDs) in the adolescent population may be limited by anxiety and pain anticipated during the insertion procedure. Our institution offers conscious sedation for IUD insertion to mitigate this concern. The objective of this study was to identify characteristics and outcomes of teens choosing between two types of conscious sedation for insertion of a levonorgestrel IUD. METHODS: This was a single-site, retrospective cohort study over a one year period, reviewing the electronic medical records of patients who had undergone an attempted IUD insertion using conscious sedation. Conscious sedation included nitrous gas (termed "light" sedation) or intravenous midazolam and fentanyl (termed "moderate" sedation). Patient demographic characteristics and medical and gynecological histories were analyzed. RESULTS: There were 69 attempted IUD insertions during the study period. Most patients (75.36%) were placed under light sedation, and 92.75% were successfully inserted. The only significant factor associated with choice in the type of conscious sedation was previous sexual activity, which increased the odds by 10.0 that the patient would choose light sedation (95% CI, 1.23-81.34; P = 0.031). Differences between other factors (age, history of sexual assault, tampon use, and gender identity) were not statistically significant between successful and failed insertions. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, history of sexual activity significantly differed between patients in our cohort who selected light sedation over moderate sedation. No other factors influenced the choice in sedative or success of IUD insertion. Knowing the characteristics of patients who choose nitrous versus intravenous sedation, and how it relates to successful insertion, may help guide pre-procedural counseling for patients regarding sedation for IUD insertion.