Treatment with nanosomal paclitaxel lipid suspension versus conventional paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer patients - a multicenter, randomized, comparative, phase II/III clinical study.

Background: A novel nanosomal paclitaxel lipid suspension (NPLS), free from Cremophor EL (CrEL) and ethanol, was developed to address the solvent-related toxicities associated with conventional paclitaxel formulation. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of NPLS versus CrEL-based paclitaxel (conventional paclitaxel) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Design: A prospective, open-label, randomized, multiple-dose, parallel, phase II/III study. Methods: Adult (18-65 years) female patients with MBC who had previously failed at least one line of chemotherapy were randomized (2:2:1) to NPLS 175 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (Q3W, n = 48, arm A), NPLS 80 mg/m2 every week (QW, n = 45, arm B) without premedication or conventional paclitaxel (Taxol®, manufactured by Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA) 175 mg/m2 Q3W (n = 27, arm C) with premedication. In the extension study, an additional 54 patients were randomized (2:1) to arm A (n = 37) or arm C (n = 17). Results: Pooled data from the primary study and its extension phase included 174 patients. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR). As per intent-to-treat analysis, ORR was significantly better in the NPLS QW arm as compared to conventional paclitaxel [44.4% (20/45) versus 22.7% (10/44), (p = 0.04)]. An improvement in ORR with NPLS Q3W versus conventional paclitaxel arm [29.4% (25/85) versus 22.7% (10/44)] (p = 0.53) was observed. Disease control rates observed were improved with NPLS Q3W versus conventional paclitaxel Q3W (77.7% versus 72.7%, p = 0.66) and with NPLS QW versus conventional paclitaxel Q3W (84.4% versus 72.7%, p = 0.20), although not significant. A lower incidence of grade III/IV peripheral sensory neuropathy, vomiting, and dyspnea was reported with NPLS Q3W versus conventional paclitaxel Q3W arms. Conclusion: NPLS demonstrated an improved tumor response rate and a favorable safety profile versus conventional paclitaxel. NPLS 80 mg/m2 QW demonstrated a significantly better response versus conventional paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 Q3W. Trial registration: Clinical Trial Registry-India (CTRI), CTRI/2010/091/001344 Registered on: 18 October 2010 (https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?EncHid=MjEzNQ==&Enc=&userName=CTRI/2010/091/001344), CTRI/2015/07/006062 Registered on: 31 July 2015 (https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?EncHid=MTE2Mjc=&Enc=&userName=CTRI/2015/07/006062).

Role of nanosomal paclitaxel lipid suspension (NPLS) in the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) Why was the study done? Paclitaxel is a commonly used drug for the treatment of breast cancer. Conventional formulation of paclitaxel is known to cause side effects like injection site reactions. A newer formulation named NPLS was developed to overcome the limitations of the conventional paclitaxel. The current study was done to compare the safety and effectiveness of NPLS and conventional paclitaxel in patients with advanced breast cancer. What did the researchers do? The research team conducted a large study in multiple hospitals across India, involving women with advanced breast cancer who had experienced treatment failure with previous chemotherapy. A total of 174 patients were randomly assigned to receive either of the three treatment schedules: (1) NPLS every 3 weeks, (2) NPLS every week, (3) conventional paclitaxel every 3 weeks. What did the researchers find? The results showed that NPLS, in a weekly schedule, led to better tumor response rates compared to conventional paclitaxel given every 3 weeks. Additionally, NPLS demonstrated a favorable safety profile, as compared to conventional paclitaxel. What do the findings mean? These findings suggest that NPLS could be a promising alternative for women with advanced breast cancer. NPLS improved the response to treatment, with a better safety profile compared to conventional paclitaxel.

Efficacy and Safety of Nanosomal Docetaxel Lipid Suspension (NDLS) versus Conventional Docetaxel as Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Therapy for Primary Operable Breast Cancer.

Objective: Nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension (NDLS) is a novel formulation developed to overcome toxicity issues caused by excipients (polysorbate 80 and ethanol) present in commercially available docetaxel formulation. We conducted a prospective, observational study to compare the outcomes of nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension (NDLS)-based versus conventional docetaxel-based chemotherapy in primary operable breast cancer. Methods: Sixty adult women with newly diagnosed stage IIb-III breast cancer were included. Patients received NDLS-based (n=30) or docetaxel-based (n=30) chemotherapy. Patients received (1) four cycles of preoperative doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by four cycles of NDLS or docetaxel (T) and surgery (neoadjuvant AC→NDLS [n=9], or neoadjuvant AC→T [n=10]), or (2) four cycles of preoperative AC followed by surgery and postoperative NDLS or T (neoadjuvant AC→adjuvant NDLS [n=14], or neoadjuvant AC→adjuvant T [n=15]), or (3) surgery followed by postoperative AC→NDLS or T (adjuvant AC→NDLS [n=7], or adjuvant AC→T [n=5]) regimens. The study outcomes were pathological complete response (pCR) rates, clinical overall response rates (ORR), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse event (AE) profile. Results: For neoadjuvant AC→T (n=10) vs neoadjuvant AC→NDLS (n=9), the pCR rates were 100% each, and the ORR were 100% vs 88.9% (p=1.0). All patients were alive at 6 months, and the median OS was not reached. Three patients had progressive disease (T: n=2, NDLS: n=1) with a DFS of 12 weeks in all three patients. Grade 3 infusion-related reactions were seen in five patients (16.7%) in T vs none in NDLS arms. Conclusion: NDLS-based neo/adjuvant chemotherapy was efficacious in the treatment of primary operable breast cancer and showed comparable pCR, ORR, DFS and OS rates versus conventional docetaxel. NDLS was better tolerated than conventional docetaxel.

Efficacy and safety of nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension based chemotherapy in metastatic ovarian carcinoma: A retrospective study.

The aim of the current study was to assess the efficacy and safety of nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension (NDLS) based chemotherapy in patients with metastatic epithelial ovarian carcinoma. In the present multicenter study, the medical records of patients who received NDLS (60-75 mg/m2; 3-weekly cycles) based chemotherapy for metastatic epithelial ovarian cancer in routine clinical care were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were followed-up from September 2014 until September 2018. The efficacy endpoints were the overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate measured in accordance with the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours 1.1. Overall survival (OS) and safety were also evaluated. Of the 13 patients evaluated, 46.2% (6/13) received NDLS-based first-line chemotherapy and 53.8% (7/13) patients received second-line chemotherapy [platinum-sensitive, 57.1% (4/7); platinum-resistant, 42.9% (3/7)]. The ORRs were 60.0% (3/5) and 57.1% (4/7) for patients receiving first- and second-line chemotherapy, respectively. The estimated median OS for patients receiving NDLS-based first-line chemotherapy was 17.4 months (follow-up duration, 4.3-49.4 months). The estimated median OS was 26.1 months (follow-up duration, 5.1-37.5 months) in patients with platinum-sensitive disease, whereas the OS was 14.8 months (follow-up duration, 3.5-14.8 months) in patients with platinum-resistant disease. No grade III/IV adverse events (AEs) were observed; ≥1 AE in grade I-II was reported in 84.6% (11/13) of patients. Overall, NDLS-based chemotherapy was efficacious and well-tolerated in the management of metastatic epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

In Silico, In Vitro, and In Vivo Evaluation of Precipitation Inhibitors in Supersaturated Lipid-Based Formulations of Venetoclax.

The concept of using precipitation inhibitors (PIs) to sustain supersaturation is well established for amorphous formulations but less in the case of lipid-based formulations (LBF). This study applied a systematic in silico-in vitro-in vivo approach to assess the merits of incorporating PIs in supersaturated LBFs (sLBF) using the model drug venetoclax. sLBFs containing hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), hydroxypropyl methylcellulose acetate succinate (HPMCAS), polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), PVP-co-vinyl acetate (PVP/VA), Pluronic F108, and Eudragit EPO were assessed in silico calculating a drug-excipient mixing enthalpy, in vitro using a PI solvent shift test, and finally, bioavailability was assessed in vivo in landrace pigs. The estimation of pure interaction enthalpies of the drug and the excipient was deemed useful in determining the most promising PIs for venetoclax. The sLBF alone (i.e., no PI present) displayed a high initial drug concentration in the aqueous phase during in vitro screening. sLBF with Pluronic F108 displayed the highest venetoclax concentration in the aqueous phase and sLBF with Eudragit EPO the lowest. In vivo, the sLBF alone showed the highest bioavailability of 26.3 ± 14.2%. Interestingly, a trend toward a decreasing bioavailability was observed for sLBF containing PIs, with PVP/VA being significantly lower compared to sLBF alone. In conclusion, the ability of a sLBF to generate supersaturated concentrations of venetoclax in vitro was translated into increased absorption in vivo. While in silico and in vitro PI screening suggested benefits in terms of prolonged supersaturation, the addition of a PI did not increase in vivo bioavailability. The findings of this study are of particular relevance to pre-clinical drug development, where the high in vivo exposure of venetoclax was achieved using a sLBF approach, and despite the perceived risk of drug precipitation from a sLBF, including a PI may not be merited in all cases.

Biweekly DoceAqualip in mCRPC patients beyond 20 cycles: A case series.

INTRODUCTION: Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for up to 10 cycles is an accepted standard regimen in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We report our experience with >20 cycles of biweekly nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension (NDLS) treatment in patients with mCRPC. CASE REPORTS: Cases with long-term treatment of NDLS treatment in mCRPC patients were identified from the medical records of Jawaharlal Nehru Cancer Hospital & Research Centre Bhopal, India. A total of three cases with >20 cycles of NDLS are presented here. MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOMES: Overall, the 3 patients received biweekly NDLS at a dose of 45 mg/m2 for 22, 36, and 40 cycles, respectively, except for one patient where NDLS was initiated at 50 mg/m2 and later reduced to 45 mg/m2. All the 3 patients reported prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (>50% decline in PSA levels from baseline). The time to treatment failure (TTF) was 14.8, 18.2, and 20.6 months in these 3 patients, respectively. PSA nadir occurred after 14, 6 and 13 cycles, respectively. The OS was 21.6, 22.2 and 25.8 months, respectively. Anemia, lymphopenia, and neutropenia were the most common adverse events. NDLS treatment was overall well-tolerated without any new safety concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Biweekly NDLS for >20 cycles was effective and well-tolerated in patients with mCRPC. NDLS can potentially be used for long-term management, which may be a requirement for most patients with mCRPC.

Efficacy and safety of nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension-based chemotherapy in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A multicenter retrospective study.

Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is the most common cancer in Indian men. Docetaxel alone or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents is recommended for the management of SCCHN. The present multicenter, retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel docetaxel formulation 'nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension (NDLS)'-based chemotherapy in SCCHN. The medical records of patients with SCCHN, who were treated with NDLS-based chemotherapy and followed up between August 2014 and September 2018, were reviewed. The efficacy endpoints were overall response rate [ORR; complete response (CR) + partial response (PR)] and disease control rate (DCR; CR + PR + stable disease) for patients receiving NDLS-based induction or palliative chemotherapy. Overall survival (OS) and safety were also evaluated. Efficacy evaluation was available in 30/34 patients (induction, 20/23; palliative, 10/11). NDLS-based induction chemotherapy showed an ORR and DCR of 95% and a median OS of 43.5 months (follow-up duration, 0.6-80.3 months). For NDLS-based palliative chemotherapy, the ORR and DCR were 50% and the median OS time was 4.6 months (follow-up duration, 1.8 to 14.3 months). At least one adverse event was reported in 82.6% patients. No new safety concerns were reported. Overall, NDLS-based chemotherapy was effective and well tolerated in the treatment of SCCHN.

Efficacy and safety of nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension based chemotherapy in gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

The current retrospective multicenter study evaluated the efficacy and safety of nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension (NDLS; DoceAqualip) based chemotherapy in patients with gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. The medical charts of patients with gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma, who were treated with NDLS (50-75 mg/m2; 3 weekly cycles) based chemotherapy and followed-up from April 2014 to September 2018, were analyzed. The study endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) in neoadjuvant and metastatic settings. Overall survival (OS) and safety were also evaluated. Of the 43 patients with gastric (n=39) and GEJ (n=4) adenocarcinoma, efficacy evaluation was available in 35 (neoadjuvant, 17/18 patients; metastatic, 18/25 patients). In the neoadjuvant setting, an ORR of 58.82% and a DCR of 94.11% were observed, whereas in the metastatic setting, the ORR was 77.77% and the DCR was 83.33%. In the neoadjuvant setting, at a follow-up ranging from 0.7 to 41.2 months, the median OS was not reached. In the metastatic setting, the median OS was 31.9 months at a follow-up ranging from 0.2 to 50.3 months. At least one adverse event (AE) was reported in 24 patients. Anemia, lymphopenia and thrombocytopenia were the most common hematological AEs, while nausea, vomiting and weakness were the most common non-hematological AEs. NDLS based treatment was well-tolerated without any new safety concerns. Overall, NDLS-based chemotherapy was effective and well-tolerated in the management of gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma.

Nanosomal Docetaxel Lipid Suspension-Based Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: Results from a Multicenter Retrospective Study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension (NDLS, DoceAqualip)-based chemotherapy in breast cancer. METHODS: Medical charts of patients with breast cancer, who were treated and followed up with NDLS (75-100 mg/m2; 3-week cycle)-based chemotherapy from August 2014 to September 2018, were analyzed in this multicenter, retrospective study. The study endpoints were overall response rate (ORR: complete response [CR]+partial response [PR]) and disease control rate (DCR: CR+PR+stable disease [SD]) in neoadjuvant and metastatic settings. Overall survival (OS) and safety were evaluated for all settings. RESULTS: Of 91 patients (neoadjuvant: 12, adjuvant: 61, metastatic: 18), efficacy evaluation in 29 patients (neoadjuvant: 12/12, metastatic: 17/18) demonstrated an ORR and DCR of 100%, respectively, in the neoadjuvant setting, and an ORR of 64.7% and DCR of 70.6%, respectively, in the metastatic setting. At a median follow-up of 21.6 months (range: 2.1 to 49.9 months), median OS was not reached in neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings, and it was 30.4 months in metastatic settings. At least one adverse event (AE) was reported in 59.3% of patients. Anemia, thrombocytopenia, lymphopenia, and neutropenia were the most common hematological AEs reported while hyperglycemia and alteration in liver function tests were the most common non-hematological AEs. NDLS-based treatment was well tolerated without any new safety concerns. CONCLUSION: Nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension-based chemotherapy was efficacious and well tolerated in the treatment of breast cancer. Further, NDLS is being evaluated prospectively in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03671044).

Chase Dosing of Lipid Formulations to Enhance Oral Bioavailability of Nilotinib in Rats.

PURPOSE: Lipid-based formulations (LBF) have shown oral bioavailability enhancement of lipophilic drugs, but not necessarily in the case of hydrophobic drugs. This study explored the potential of lipid vehicles to improve the bioavailability of the hydrophobic drug nilotinib comparing a chase dosing approach and lipid suspensions. METHODS: Nilotinib in vivo bioavailability in rats was determined after administering an aqueous suspension chase dosed with blank olive oil, Captex 1000, Peceol or Capmul MCM, respectively. Absolute bioavailability was determined (relative to an intravenous formulation). Pharmacokinetic parameters were compared to lipid suspensions. RESULTS: Compared to the lipid suspensions, the chase dosed lipids showed a 2- to 7-fold higher bioavailability. Both long chain chase dosed excipients also significantly increased the bioavailability up to 2-fold compared to the aqueous suspension. Deconvolution of the pharmacokinetic data indicated that chase dosing of nilotinib resulted in prolonged absorption compared to the aqueous suspension. CONCLUSION: Chase dosed LBF enhanced the in vivo bioavailability of nilotinib. Long chain lipids showed superior performance compared to medium chain lipids. Chase dosing appeared to prolong the absorption phase of the drug. Therefore, chase dosing of LBF is favourable compared to lipid suspensions for 'brick dust' molecules such as nilotinib. Graphical Abstract The potential of bio-enabling lipid vehicles, administered via chase dosing and lipid suspensions, has been evaluated as an approach to enhance oral bioavailability of nilotinib.

Management of primary squamous cell carcinoma of the pancreas with a nanosomal paclitaxel lipid suspension-based regimen: A case report.

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the pancreas is a rare tumor with only a few case reports available. It is an aggressive form of pancreatic cancer with a poor prognosis. The diagnosis and optimal management of SCC of the pancreas is poorly defined due to the lack of standard treatment or guidelines and owing to the rarity of this malignancy. Patients suffering from SCC of the pancreas do not respond well to chemotherapy or radiotherapy and isolated reports are available on the use of gemcitabine and newer taxane formulations. Surgical resection of the tumor is the most effective modality; however, due to a delay in diagnosis, the majority of pancreatic SCCs remain unresectable. Herein, a case of SCC of the pancreatic tail is reported in a 60-year-old patient who was managed with a combination of albumin-free nanosomal paclitaxel lipid suspension (NPLS) and gemcitabine in a neoadjuvant setting. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first such case report of a locally advanced SCC of the pancreatic tail showing an overall survival of 1 year following treatment with an NPLS based regimen. The treatment was well tolerated with no serious safety concerns.

New Insights into Using Lipid Based Suspensions for 'Brick Dust' Molecules: Case Study of Nilotinib.

PURPOSE: Lipid suspensions have been shown to be a suitable bio-enabling formulation approach for highly lipophilic or 'grease ball' drug molecules, but studies on 'brick dust' drugs are lacking. This study explored the utility of lipid suspensions for enhancing oral bioavailability of the rather hydrophobic drug nilotinib in vivo in rats. METHODS: Four lipid suspensions were developed containing long chain triglycerides, medium chain triglyceride, long chain monoglycerides and medium chain monoglycerides and in vivo bioavailability was compared to an aqueous suspension. Additionally, in vitro lipolysis and wettability tests were conducted. RESULTS: Nilotinib lipid suspensions did not show a bioavailability increase compared to an aqueous suspension. The bioavailability was lower for triglyceride suspensions, relative to both monoglyceride and an aqueous suspension. The long chain monoglyceride displayed a significantly higher bioavailability relative to triglycerides. In vitro lipolysis results suggested entrapment of nilotinib crystals within poorly dispersible triglycerides, leading to slower nilotinib release and absorption. This was further supported by higher wettability of nilotinib by lipids. CONCLUSION: Monoglycerides improved oral bioavailability of nilotinib in rats, relative to triglycerides. For 'brick dust' drugs formulated as lipid suspensions, poorly dispersible formulations may delay the release of drug crystals from the formulation leading to reduced absorption. Graphical Abstract An aqueous and four lipid suspensions have been evaluated in in vitro and in vivo to gain insights into the potential benefits and limitations of lipid suspensions.

Characterization of the suspension stability of pharmaceuticals using a shadowgraphic imaging method.

A new shadowgraphic imaging method and an associated instrument for analyzing the physical stability of pharmaceutical suspensions are introduced in this paper. The new suspension tester consists mainly of a high-resolution camera that takes sequential shadowgraphic images of emulsions or suspensions and a 2D collimated LED for simultaneous whole-sample illumination in bright field. A built-in ultrasonic bath provides controlled initial agitation to the samples of interest. Sequential images acquired by the experimental setup were used to derive normalized transmission profiles from which an instability index was developed for quantitative stability comparison between samples. Instrument performance was verified by measuring the stability of a series of oil-in-water emulsions prepared with surfactant mixtures of different ratios. The new instrument correctly determined the required hydrophilic-lipophilic balance for sunflower oil to be 7.0. The stability of a pressurized suspension of spray dried lipid (DSPC) particles was monitored for 5 days after propellant filling. Although stable for the first 24 h, the lipid suspension was found to decrease in stability from day 1 to day 4. Morphological and spectroscopic analysis revealed that the suspended DSPC particles had reformed into large thin sheets of lipid, thereby causing the gradual stability decrease during the aging study. The effects of initial agitation on the stability of suspensions were demonstrated by agitating a suspension of micronized fluticasone propionate in propellant using a wrist action shaker and an ultrasonic bath respectively. A significant improvement of suspension stability was achieved by replacing the wrist action shaker method with ultrasonic agitation. Simultaneous illumination of the complete suspension, a high image acquisition rate, and controlled initial agitation are features that make this new suspension tester a suitable and more reliable instrument for investigating the stability of pressurized pharmaceutical suspensions.

Efficacy and safety of DoceAqualip in a patient with locally advanced cervical cancer: A case report.

The standard of care for locally advanced cervical cancer has been the combination of a taxane with platinum based therapy. Conventional docetaxel is known to cause hypersensitivity reactions, fluid retention and other toxicities due to polysorbate-80 and ethanol. Corticosteroid premedication prior to docetaxel administration is required to prevent these toxicities, however, toxicities are still observed, sometimes fatal, despite premedication. DoceAqualip, a nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension, developed with lipids generally regarded as safe (GRAS) by the US Food and Drug Administration, is devoid of polysorbate-80 and ethanol. DoceAqualip has been demonstrated to be effective and well-tolerated in various cancer types. The authors' report a case of a patient with Stage IIIB cervical cancer who was treated with carboplatin and DoceAqualip (concurrent ChemoRT) and achieved complete response without any serious adverse events.