Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 155
Filtrar
Más filtros

Base de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cureus ; 16(8): e68349, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39355078

RESUMEN

The FDA's approval of Pfizer's new respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prefusion (preF) vaccine, Abrysvo, marks a critical milestone in infant health and well-being by preventing lower respiratory tract infections in the most vulnerable. The vaccine has been approved for administration to pregnant women at 32 to 36 weeks of gestation and elderly people over 60. This review explores the Abrysvo vaccine, detailing its mechanism, efficacy, safety, and adverse events. It aims to inform healthcare providers about this vital method for safeguarding infant respiratory health through maternal immunization.

2.
Vaccine ; 42(26): 126256, 2024 Sep 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39260053

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although numerous studies support the safety of influenza vaccination during pregnancy, fewer studies have evaluated the risk of miscarriage or considered the effect of prior immunization. METHODS: Using national de-identified administrative claims data from the Optum Labs Data Warehouse, we conducted a claims-based cohort study of 117,626 pregnancies between January 2009 and December 2018. We identified pandemic A(H1N1)pdm09 and seasonal influenza vaccinations using CPT codes. Fetal loss was defined as miscarriage, medical termination, or stillbirth as identified by ICD-10-CM diagnostic codes. Cox proportional hazard models treating influenza vaccination as a time-varying exposure, weighted for loss-to-follow-up and stratified by baseline probability of vaccination, were used to model the risk of fetal loss by exposure to influenza vaccine. RESULTS: About 31.4 % of the cohort had a record of influenza vaccination; 10.0 % were vaccinated before pregnancy only, 17.8 % during pregnancy only, and 3.6 % before and during pregnancy. The risk of miscarriage was 39 % lower among those vaccinated during pregnancy compared to unvaccinated (adjusted hazard ratio, aHR 0.61; 95 % CI 0.50, 0.74) and was similar for medical termination or stillbirth (HR 0.69; 95 % CI 0.45, 1.03 and aHR 0.99; 95 % CI 0.76, 1.30, respectively). Similar results were observed for women who received the vaccine before and during pregnancy. We observed little to no association between vaccination before pregnancy and risk of miscarriage (HR 0.98; 95 % CI 0.76, 1.26), medical termination (HR 1.02; 95 % CI 0.46, 2.24), or stillbirth (HR 1.14, 95 % CI 0.77, 1.69). DISCUSSION: Influenza vaccination was not associated with an increased risk of fetal loss. These results support the safety of influenza vaccine administration even when administered before or early during pregnancy.

3.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 22665, 2024 09 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39349584

RESUMEN

Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is a major cause of pneumonia, sepsis, and meningitis in infants younger than 3 months of age. Furthermore, GBS infection in pregnant women is associated with stillbirths and pre-term delivery. It also causes disease in immunocompromised adults and the elderly, but the highest incidence of the disease occurs in neonates and young infants. At this time, there are no licensed vaccines against GBS. Complete GBS genome sequencing has helped identify genetically conserved and immunogenic proteins, which could serve as vaccine immunogens. In this study, in silico reverse vaccinology method were used to evaluate the prevalence and conservation of GBS proteins in invasive and colonizing isolates from South African infants and women, respectively. Furthermore, this study aimed to predict potential GBS vaccine targets by evaluating metrics such as antigenicity, physico-chemical properties, subcellular localization, secondary and tertiary structures, and epitope prediction and conservation. A total of 648 invasive and 603 colonizing GBS isolate sequences were screened against a panel of 89 candidate GBS proteins. Ten of the 89 proteins were highly genetically conserved in invasive and colonizing GBS isolates, nine of which were computationally inferred proteins (gbs2106, SAN_1577, SAN_0356, SAN_1808, SAN_1685, SAN_0413, SAN_0990, SAN_1040, SAN_0226) and one was the surface Immunogenic Protein (SIP). Additionally, the nine proteins were predicted to be more antigenic than the SIP protein (antigenicity score of > 0.6498), highlighting their potential as GBS vaccine antigen targets.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Estreptocócicas , Vacunas Estreptocócicas , Streptococcus agalactiae , Humanos , Sudáfrica/epidemiología , Streptococcus agalactiae/inmunología , Streptococcus agalactiae/genética , Streptococcus agalactiae/metabolismo , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/microbiología , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/prevención & control , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/inmunología , Femenino , Vacunas Estreptocócicas/inmunología , Lactante , Simulación por Computador , Embarazo , Proteínas Bacterianas/inmunología , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Proteínas de la Membrana/inmunología , Proteínas de la Membrana/genética , Proteínas de la Membrana/metabolismo , Recién Nacido , Adulto
4.
Front Pediatr ; 12: 1386082, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39144471

RESUMEN

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the leading cause of acute lower respiratory infections in children around the world. The post-pandemic era has resulted in a notable increase in reported cases of RSV infections, co-circulation of other respiratory viruses, shifts in epidemiology, altered respiratory season timing, and increased healthcare demand. Low- and middle-income countries are responsible for the highest burden of RSV disease, contributing significantly to health expenses during respiratory seasons and RSV-associated mortality in children. Until recently, supportive measures were the only intervention to treat or prevent RSV-infection, since preventive strategies like palivizumab are limited for high-risk populations. Advances in new available strategies, such as long-acting monoclonal antibodies during the neonatal period and vaccination of pregnant women, are now a reality. As the Regional Expert Group of the Latin American Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (SLIPE), we sought to evaluate the burden of RSV infection in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) region, analyze current strategies to prevent RSV infection in children, and provide recommendations for implementing new strategies for preventing RSV infection in children in LAC region.

5.
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc ; 13(Supplement_2): S110-S114, 2024 Jul 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38995085

RESUMEN

Newborns and young infants are at risk for severe respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) lower respiratory tract infection. Passive immunity is the mainstay of infection prevention in this cohort. Transplacental transfer of maternal antibodies provides the newborn with immediate protection from life-threatening infections, however, is dependent upon gestational age, birth weight, mother's age, recent maternal vaccination, maternal nutritional status, maternal immunocompetence and medical conditions, and placental integrity. Efficient transplacental transfer of RSV-neutralizing antibodies have led to the development and approval of maternal RSV immunization for the protection of the newborn. Additionally, administration of RSV-specific antibodies to infants leads to high serum titers of RSV-neutralizing antibodies and further protection from severe disease.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales , Inmunidad Materno-Adquirida , Inmunización Pasiva , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio , Humanos , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/prevención & control , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/inmunología , Inmunización Pasiva/métodos , Recién Nacido , Lactante , Femenino , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/sangre , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/inmunología , Virus Sincitial Respiratorio Humano/inmunología , Embarazo , Vacunas contra Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/inmunología , Vacunas contra Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/administración & dosificación
6.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1359209, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39040104

RESUMEN

Introduction: Although the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy have been proven, there is still little data explaining neonatal outcomes of maternal pre-pregnancy vaccination. Methods: Here, we investigated the impact of vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection on maternal-neonate immune response in a cohort study involving 141 pregnant individuals, and defined the importance of maternal COVID-19 vaccination timing for its effectiveness. Results and discussion: Our data indicate that vertically transferred maternal hybrid immunity provides significantly better antiviral protection for a neonate than either maternal post-infection or post-vaccination immunity alone. Higher neutralization potency among mothers immunized before pregnancy and their newborns highlights the promising role of pre-pregnancy vaccination in neonatal protection. A comparison of neutralizing antibody titers calculated for each dyad suggests that infection and pre-/during-pregnancy vaccination all support transplacental transfer, providing the offspring with strong passive immunity against SARS-CoV-2. Analysis of neutralizing antibody levels in maternal sera collected during pregnancy and later during delivery shows that immunization may exert a positive effect on maternal protection.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Inmunidad Materno-Adquirida , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunación , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/inmunología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Recién Nacido , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/sangre , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Vacunación/métodos , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/prevención & control , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/inmunología
7.
Biol Trace Elem Res ; 2024 Jun 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38874865

RESUMEN

Contagious ecthyma is a contagious zoonotic disease caused by the Orf virus that can infect farm animals and humans, but no vaccine is available for pregnant mothers. Excessive oxidative stress during pregnancy can suppress the vaccine immune response in pregnant mothers; hence, maternal micronutrient supplementation could effectively improve the immune response, health, and oxidative status during pregnancy. In this study, we employed an 8-week-old pregnant rat model to receive a single intramuscular dose of 200 µg of ORF DNA vaccine with or without vitamin E and selenium supplementation to evaluate their effect on immune responses (specific IgG and IgG isotypes), oxidative stress, liver enzymes, and blood glucose levels in maternal-neonatal serum and milk secretions. Additionally, antioxidant-related gene expressions were analyzed in the maternal placenta and pups' liver. The results showed that supplementation of vitamin E and selenium with ORF DNA vaccination increased the production of specific antibody and IgG isotypes (IgG1 and IgG2a) and reduced the oxidative stress in neonatal-maternal serum and milk compared to both the control group and those vaccinated without supplementation (p < 0.05). Notably, the ORF DNA vaccine did not cause oxidative stress and hepatic damage. However, combined supplementation of vitamin E and selenium with DNA vaccination significantly decreased serum malondialdehyde (MDA) levels and improved the antioxidant-related enzyme activities of glutathione peroxidase (GPX), superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1), and selenoprotein P (SELP) in the maternal placenta and liver of pups (p < 0.05). In conclusion, maternal supplementation of vitamin E and selenium enhanced the immune responses of the ORF DNA vaccine by mitigating oxidative stress in pregnant rats and could thus be a promising strategy for better health outcomes for both mothers and neonates.

8.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2358566, 2024 Dec 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38847198

RESUMEN

A maternal vaccine and long-acting monoclonal antibody (mAb) were recently approved to protect infants against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). We identified subgroups of pregnant people with different preferences for RSV preventives and respondent characteristics associated with subgroup membership. An online survey, including a discrete choice experiment (DCE), was conducted among US pregnant people. RSV preventive attributes included effectiveness, duration of protection during RSV season, injection recipient/timing, preventive type (vaccine or mAb), and type of visit required to receive injection. In DCE choice tasks, pregnant people selected between two hypothetical preventive profiles with varying attribute-levels and a no-preventive option. Logistic regression, including latent class analysis (LCA), was used to analyze the data. Of 992 pregnant people (mean age: 30.0 years), 60.3% were expecting their second/later birth. LCA identified three preference subgroups: 'Effectiveness' (preventive choice mostly driven by increases in effectiveness; 51.4% class membership probability), 'Season' (preventive choice mostly driven by improvement in duration of protection during the RSV season; 39.2% class membership probability), and 'No Preventive' (frequently chose no-preventive option; 9.4% class membership probability). 'Effectiveness' and 'Season' preferred maternal vaccine over mAb; mAb was preferred by 'No Preventive.' Perceiving RSV as serious for infants, higher health literacy, and lower household income were associated with 'Effectiveness.' Perceiving RSV as serious for pregnant people was associated with 'Season.' Perceiving RSV to not be serious for pregnant people and not being employed were associated with 'No Preventive.' Subgroups of pregnant people vary in preferences for RSV preventives. Most pregnant people preferred a maternal vaccine, although some may be more willing to accept alternative preventive options.


Asunto(s)
Análisis de Clases Latentes , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio , Vacunas contra Virus Sincitial Respiratorio , Virus Sincitial Respiratorio Humano , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/prevención & control , Estados Unidos , Adulto , Vacunas contra Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/inmunología , Vacunas contra Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/administración & dosificación , Adulto Joven , Virus Sincitial Respiratorio Humano/inmunología , Lactante , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Prioridad del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Mujeres Embarazadas/psicología , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Adolescente
9.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2361499, 2024 Dec 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38847213

RESUMEN

Maternal vaccination against pertussis is safe and provides effective protection against pertussis for the newborn, but the vaccine coverage rate remains generally low. Norway is currently planning for introduction of routine maternal pertussis vaccination. To assess maternal pertussis vaccination acceptance among pregnant Norwegian women, we surveyed women at 20-40 weeks gestation in 2019. Among the 1,148 pregnant women participating in this cross-sectional study, 73.8% reported they would accept pertussis vaccination during pregnancy if it was recommended, 6.9% would not accept and 19.2% were undecided. Predictors for low likelihood of accepting pertussis vaccination during pregnancy included low confidence in health authorities and in maternal pertussis vaccination safety and effectiveness, low awareness and adherence to influenza vaccination during pregnancy, and low awareness of pertussis vaccination. The major reasons reported for not accepting or being undecided about maternal pertussis vaccination were lack of information on vaccine safety for both mother and child. Most women reported that they would consult their general practitioner or a midwife for information if they were offered maternal pertussis vaccination. General practitioners and midwives were also regarded as the most trustworthy sources of information if the women were in doubt about accepting vaccination. We conclude that information addressing safety concerns and raising awareness about maternal pertussis vaccination could increase acceptance of maternal pertussis vaccination. Our findings highlight the pivotal role of the antenatal and primary health care services in providing such information to pregnant women.


Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Vacuna contra la Tos Ferina , Mujeres Embarazadas , Vacunación , Tos Ferina , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Noruega , Tos Ferina/prevención & control , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacuna contra la Tos Ferina/administración & dosificación , Vacunación/psicología , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Mujeres Embarazadas/psicología , Adulto Joven , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/prevención & control , Adolescente
10.
Vaccine ; 42(22): 126041, 2024 Sep 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38853036

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Maternal vaccination with respiratory syncytial virus prefusion F vaccine (RSVpreF) is effective at preventing RSV-associated lower respiratory tract illness (LRTI) in newborns/infants. METHODS: This subgroup analysis from the global, phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled MATISSE (Maternal Immunization Study for Safety and Efficacy) trial evaluated participants enrolled in Japan. Pregnant women 24-36 weeks' gestation were randomized 1:1 to receive RSVpreF or placebo. Maternal safety endpoints included local reactions/systemic events within 7 days, adverse events (AEs) through 1 month, and serious AEs (SAEs) through 6 months after vaccination. In infants born to maternal participants, safety endpoints included specific birth outcomes, AEs through 1 month after birth, and SAEs and newly diagnosed chronic medical conditions through 12 or 24 months after birth. Vaccine efficacy in infants was assessed against RSV-positive, medically attended LRTI (RSV-MA-LRTI) and severe RSV-MA-LRTI through 180 days after birth. RESULTS: In Japan, 230 maternal participants received RSVpreF and 232 received placebo; 218 and 216 infants born to these mothers, respectively, were analyzed. Observed vaccine efficacy (95 % CIs) against infant RSV-MA-LRTI within 90 and 180 days after birth was 100.0 % (30.9, 100.0; RSVpreF, 0 cases; placebo, 7 cases) and 87.6 % (7.2, 99.7; RSVpreF, 1 case; placebo, 8 cases), respectively. Vaccine efficacy (95 % CIs) against severe RSV-MA-LRTI within 90 and 180 days was 100.0 % (-140.9, 100.0; RSVpreF, 0 cases; placebo, 3 cases) and 75.1 % (-151.5, 99.5; RSVpreF, 1 case; placebo, 4 cases), respectively. No safety concerns were identified. AE rates ≤1 month after vaccination/birth were similar in the RSVpreF (maternal, 16.1 %; infant, 48.6 %) and placebo (19.8 %; 50.5 %) groups. Preterm birth rates were also similar (RSVpreF, 3.2 %; placebo, 6.0 %). CONCLUSIONS: Safety and efficacy data in Japanese participants were consistent with overall MATISSE results, supporting the efficacy of maternal RSVpreF vaccination against severe MA-RSV-LRTI/MA-RSV-LRTI in infants, with no safety concerns. NCT04424316.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio , Vacunas contra Virus Sincitial Respiratorio , Vacunación , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Método Doble Ciego , Pueblos del Este de Asia , Japón , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/prevención & control , Vacunas contra Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/inmunología , Vacunas contra Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/efectos adversos , Virus Sincitial Respiratorio Humano/inmunología , Vacunación/métodos , Eficacia de las Vacunas
11.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 12(5)2024 May 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38793811

RESUMEN

We assessed the impact of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) preventive characteristics on the intentions of pregnant people and healthcare providers (HCPs) to protect infants with a maternal vaccine or monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Pregnant people and HCPs who treated pregnant people and/or infants were recruited via convenience sample from a general research panel to complete a cross-sectional, web-based survey, including a discrete choice experiment (DCE) wherein respondents chose between hypothetical RSV preventive profiles varying on five attributes (effectiveness, preventive type [maternal vaccine vs. mAb], injection recipient/timing, type of medical visit required to receive the injection, and duration of protection during RSV season) and a no-preventive option. A best-worst scaling (BWS) exercise was included to explore the impact of additional attributes on preventive preferences. Data were collected between October and November 2022. Attribute-level preference weights and relative importance (RI) were estimated. Overall, 992 pregnant people and 310 HCPs participated. A preventive (vs. none) was chosen 89.2% (pregnant people) and 96.0% (HCPs) of the time (DCE). Effectiveness was most important to preventive choice for pregnant people (RI = 48.0%) and HCPs (RI = 41.7%); all else equal, pregnant people (RI = 5.5%) and HCPs (RI = 7.2%) preferred the maternal vaccine over mAbs, although preventive type had limited influence on choice. Longer protection, protection starting at birth or the beginning of RSV season, and use for both pre-term and full-term babies were ranked highest in importance (BWS). Pregnant people and HCPs strongly preferred a preventive to protect infants against RSV (vs. none), underscoring the need to incorporate RSV preventives into routine care.

12.
Immun Inflamm Dis ; 12(4): e1257, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38661110

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the world's leading cause of viral acute lower respiratory infections (ALRI) in infants. WHO has identified maternal RSV vaccination a priority and candidate vaccines are in development; however, vaccine hesitancy remains an impediment to successful implementation of maternal immunization. This study, the largest antenatal survey conducted to-date, aimed to examine maternal RSV awareness, likely acceptance of RSV vaccination in pregnancy, and attitudes to maternal vaccination. METHODS: Pregnant women of all gestations attending antenatal clinic of a university maternity hospital in Ireland were invited to participate. An information leaflet provided, consent obtained, and survey administered examining RSV awareness, willingness to avail of antenatal RSV vaccination, factors influencing acceptability and preferred sources of assistance. Research Ethics Committee (REC) approval obtained, and general data protection regulation (GDPR) guidelines followed. RESULTS: 528 women completed the survey. A large proportion (75.6%) had never heard of RSV, yet 48.5% would still avail of a vaccine, 45.8% were undecided and only 5.3% would not. The main factor making vaccination acceptable to women (76.4%) was that it protects their infant from illness (p < .001, CV 0.336 for association with acceptance) and general practitioner (GP) was the preferred guidance source in decision-making (57.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite low levels of maternal awareness of RSV, pregnant women in Ireland are open to availing of antenatal vaccination. Maternal immunization strategies need to focus on infant's protection from RSV-associated ALRI along with vaccine safety, and build on an interdisciplinary collaboration of maternal, neonatal, primary care and public health services.


Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio , Vacunas contra Virus Sincitial Respiratorio , Vacunación , Humanos , Femenino , Irlanda/epidemiología , Embarazo , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/prevención & control , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/psicología , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/inmunología , Adulto , Vacunas contra Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/inmunología , Vacunas contra Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/administración & dosificación , Vacunación/psicología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/prevención & control , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/psicología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/inmunología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven , Vacilación a la Vacunación/psicología , Vacilación a la Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Mujeres Embarazadas/psicología , Virus Sincitial Respiratorio Humano/inmunología , Adolescente
13.
Vaccine ; 42(13): 3230-3238, 2024 May 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38627147

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Capsular polysaccharide (CPS) serotype-specific Immunoglobulin G (IgG) in cord blood has been proposed as a correlate of protection against invasive Group B Streptococcus (iGBS) disease. Although protective levels are required in infants throughout the window of vulnerability up to 3 months of age, little is known regarding the kinetics of GBS-specific IgG over this period. METHODS: We enrolled 33 healthy infants born to mothers colonized with GBS. We collected cord blood and infant blood samples either at one (21-35 days), two (49-63 days), or three months of age (77-91 days). We measured GBS serotype-specific CPS IgG concentrations and calculated the decay rate using a mixed-effects model. We further explored whether the antibody kinetics were affected by common maternal and infant factors and estimated the correlation between IgG concentration at birth and one, two, and three months of age. RESULTS: The half-life estimate of IgG concentration for homologous and non-homologous GBS serotypes in paired samples with detectable IgG levels at both time points was 27.4 (95 % CI: 23.5-32.9) days. The decay rate did not vary by maternal age (p = 0.7), ethnicity (p = 0.1), gravida (p = 0.1), gestation (p = 0.7), and infant sex (p = 0.1). Predicted IgG titres above the assay lower limit of quantification on day 30 strongly correlated with titres at birth (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.71 [95 % CI: 0.60-0.80]). CONCLUSION: Our results provide a basis for future investigations into the use of antibody kinetics in defining a serocorrelate of protection against late-onset iGBS disease.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antibacterianos , Inmunoglobulina G , Infecciones Estreptocócicas , Streptococcus agalactiae , Humanos , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/sangre , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/inmunología , Streptococcus agalactiae/inmunología , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Lactante , Femenino , Recién Nacido , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/inmunología , Masculino , Reino Unido , Sangre Fetal/inmunología , Estudios de Cohortes , Embarazo , Adulto , Serogrupo , Inmunidad Materno-Adquirida
14.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 166(2): 639-643, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38445529

RESUMEN

Group B streptococcus (GBS) poses a significant threat to neonates, leading to morbidity and mortality. Intrapartum antibiotics, although effective, have limitations, prompting the exploration of maternal vaccination. This study reviews the current evidence for maternal GBS vaccination in the prevention of early-onset GBS disease in newborns. A search on Google Scholar, PubMed, and Scopus identified studies assessing the impact of maternal GBS vaccination on early-onset GBS disease. Inclusion criteria comprised English-language clinical trials or observational studies. Data extraction included study details, immunogenicity profiles, effectiveness, safety outcomes, and relevant findings. Qualitative synthesis was employed for data analysis. Five studies meeting the inclusion criteria were reviewed. Maternal GBS vaccines demonstrated efficacy with sustained immunogenicity. Adverse events, although documented, were predominantly non-severe. Variability in immune responses and maternal-to-infant antibody ratios show the need for tailored vaccination approaches. Long-term follow up and surveillance are essential to assess persistence and identify unintended effects. Positive outcomes in vaccine efficacy support GBS vaccination integration into maternal health programs. Implementation challenges in diverse healthcare infrastructures require tailored approaches, especially in resource-limited settings. Overcoming cultural barriers and ensuring healthcare provider awareness are crucial for successful vaccination.


Asunto(s)
Transmisión Vertical de Enfermedad Infecciosa , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo , Infecciones Estreptocócicas , Vacunas Estreptocócicas , Streptococcus agalactiae , Humanos , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/prevención & control , Femenino , Recién Nacido , Vacunas Estreptocócicas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Estreptocócicas/inmunología , Embarazo , Streptococcus agalactiae/inmunología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/prevención & control , Transmisión Vertical de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Vacunación
15.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 12(3)2024 Mar 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38543946

RESUMEN

This study assessed IgG levels to influenza/pertussis and neutralizing antibody (Nab) responses of COVID-19 vaccines in blood of pregnant women following immunization with pertussis (Tdap), influenza, and COVID-19 vaccines. We prospectively collected 71 participants categorized by the following vaccine combinations: 3TI, 4TI, 3T, and 4T groups (three and four doses of COVID-19 vaccines plus Tdap/influenza or Tdap vaccines alone). Our findings have indicated that the 3TI group exhibited elevated IgG levels for influenza B compared to the 3T group (12.90 vs. 7.75 U, p = 0.001); this pattern was not observed for influenza A. Pertussis IgG levels remained uniform across all groups. The 4TI group demonstrated a greater Nab inhibition rate from COVID-19 vaccines compared to both the 3TI and 3T groups (61.34% vs. 22.5% and 15.16%, respectively, p = 0.001). We observed no correlation between Nab inhibition rate and IgG levels for Tdap/influenza, with the exception of a moderate correlation with influenza B in the 3TI group. The efficacy of Tdap vaccine in pregnant women remained consistent, regardless of the administration of COVID-19 or influenza vaccines. Interestingly, without the influenza vaccine, both three and four doses of the COVID-19 vaccine still offered protection against influenza A, but not B. Hence, co-administering COVID-19, influenza, and Tdap vaccines during prenatal care maintains immunogenicity and is highly advised to safeguard pregnant women fully.

16.
Neonatology ; 121(3): 271-282, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38286126

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Severe respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) disease is most prevalent during infancy, particularly in those born prematurely, who benefit least from maternal antibody transfers. Maternal immunization is an attractive prevention leading to vaccine clinical trials. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate recent maternal RSV vaccine trials. METHODS: Following PRISMA-P guidelines for systematic reviews and registered at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, this study shortlisted six randomized clinical trials of suitable quality from four databases. Meta-analysis evaluated vaccine safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy in infants and their mothers. RESULTS: From random-effects and fixed-effects meta-analysis between trial and control arms, the maternal post-vaccination geometric antibody (Ab) titers showed pooled standard mean differences (SMDs [95% CI]) at delivery of (4.14 [2.91-5.37]), (3.95 [2.79-5.11]), and (12.20 [7.76, 16.64]) for RSV neutralizing Ab A, B, and F IgG, respectively. Vaccine administration was more likely than placebo to cause local pain, erythema, swelling, and systemic myalgia. Furthermore, the Ab levels in infants at birth showed pooled SMDs of each RSV A (3.9 [2.81-4.99]), RSV B (1.86 [1.09-2.62]), and RSV F IgG (2.24 [1.24-3.23]). The overall reduction of RSV-related lower respiratory tract infections and hospitalizations in the first 6 months of life was 52% and 48%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Not only does antenatal RSV vaccination look safe and immunogenic in vaccinated mothers, but it also reliably provides effective antibody levels in infants and diminishes RSV-related severe disease in infants under 6 months of age.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio , Vacunas contra Virus Sincitial Respiratorio , Vacunación , Humanos , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/prevención & control , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/inmunología , Vacunas contra Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/inmunología , Vacunas contra Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/administración & dosificación , Lactante , Femenino , Inmunidad Materno-Adquirida , Virus Sincitial Respiratorio Humano/inmunología , Recién Nacido , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Embarazo , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal
17.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob ; 3(1): 100189, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38268538

RESUMEN

Background: Pregnancy is associated with a higher risk of adverse symptoms and outcomes for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection for both mother and neonate. Antibodies can provide protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection and are induced in pregnant women after vaccination or infection. Passive transfer of these antibodies from mother to fetus in utero may provide protection to the neonate against infection. However, it is unclear whether the magnitude or quality and kinetics of maternally derived fetal antibodies differs in the context of maternal infection or vaccination. Objective: We aimed to determine whether antibodies transferred from maternal to fetus differed in quality or quantity between infection- or vaccination-induced humoral immune responses. Methods: We evaluated 93 paired maternal and neonatal umbilical cord blood plasma samples collected between October 2020 and February 2022 from a birth cohort of pregnant women from New Orleans, Louisiana, with histories of SARS-CoV-2 infection and/or vaccination. Plasma was profiled for the levels of spike-specific antibodies and induction of antiviral humoral immune functions, including neutralization and Fc-mediated innate immune effector functions. Responses were compared between 4 groups according to maternal infection and vaccination. Results: We found that SARS-CoV-2 vaccination or infection during pregnancy increased the levels of antiviral antibodies compared to naive subjects. Vaccinated mothers and cord samples had the highest anti-spike antibody levels and antiviral function independent of the time of vaccination during pregnancy. Conclusions: These results show that the most effective passive transfer of functional antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in utero is achieved through vaccination, highlighting the importance of vaccination in pregnant women.

18.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 11(12)2023 Nov 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38140138

RESUMEN

Tetanus, pertussis, influenza, and COVID-19 vaccines are recommended for the prevention of related morbidity and mortality during pregnancy and postpartum. Despite the established benefits of vaccination for prenatal and postnatal women, maternal vaccination is not universally included in routine antenatal programs, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Furthermore, the uptake of recommended vaccines among pregnant and postpartum women remains below optimum globally. This review aimed to map the evidence on interventions to improve knowledge, attitudes, and uptake of recommended vaccines among pregnant and postpartum women. We conducted a comprehensive and systematic search for relevant literature in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCOhost, and Google Scholar. Overall, 29 studies published between 2010 and 2023 were included in this review. The majority (n = 27) of these studies were from high-income countries. A total of 14 studies focused on the influenza vaccine, 6 on the Tdap vaccine, 8 on both influenza and Tdap vaccines, and only one study on the COVID-19 vaccine. Patient-centered interventions predominated the evidence base (66%), followed by provider-focused (7%), health system-focused (10%), and multilevel interventions (17%). Overall, the effect of these interventions on knowledge, attitudes, and uptake of maternal vaccines was variable.

19.
Diseases ; 11(4)2023 11 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37987278

RESUMEN

Special populations, particularly pregnant women, are uniquely susceptible to infectious diseases due to alterations in their immunological, respiratory, and cardiovascular systems during gestation. Influenza infections during the perinatal period have been associated with more severe maternal and perinatal outcomes, underscoring the critical importance of vaccination data for pregnant women. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), all pregnant women and those of childbearing age should receive the inactivated influenza vaccine, irrespective of their pregnancy stage. This study aimed to elucidate factors influencing neonatal antibody presence following maternal influenza vaccination. Conducted through convenience sampling in Athens, Greece, this study involved 78 pregnant women who received flu vaccinations. The participants completed questionnaires covering demographics, obstetric history, attitudes toward influenza vaccination, and knowledge about the influenza virus and pregnancy vaccination. Blood samples were collected from 83 neonates to assess IgG antibody presence. Five of the surveyed women had twin pregnancies. The statistical analysis employed IBM SPSS-Statistics version 26.0. This study revealed the presence of positive influenza A and B antibodies in neonates following maternal immunization. Furthermore, it identified factors such as the gestational week and timing of vaccination during pregnancy that influenced the transfer of antibodies from mother to fetus. These findings offer valuable insights for healthcare professionals to provide informed recommendations on influenza vaccination during pregnancy and empower expectant mothers to make informed decisions about the benefits of immunization.

20.
Vaccine ; 41(51): 7632-7640, 2023 Dec 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37993354

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Assessment of maternal vaccine coverage is important for understanding and quantifying the impact of currently recommended vaccines as well as modeling the potential impact of future vaccines. However, existing data lack detail regarding uptake according to week of gestational age (wGA). Such granularity is valuable for more accurate estimation of vaccine impact. OBJECTIVE: To summarize contemporary maternal Tdap vaccination uptake, overall, yearly, and by wGA, and maternal influenza vaccination uptake, overall, by influenza observation year, immunization month, and delivery month, in the US. METHODS: Female patients 18-49 years of age with a pregnancy resulting in a live born infant (i.e., delivery) between 2017 and 2021 were selected from the Optum electronic health records (EHRs) database. Recently published gestational age algorithms were utilized to estimate wGA. RESULTS: Of 1,021,260 deliveries among 886,660 women between 2017-2021, 55.1% had Tdap vaccination during pregnancy; vaccine coverage varied slightly by year (2017: 56.6%; 2018: 55.2%; 2019: 55.2%; 2020: 54.7%; 2021: 52.1%). Most (64.4%) maternal Tdap vaccinations occurred 27-32 wGA; 79.5% occurred during the entire 10-week recommended vaccination window (27-36 wGA). In the evaluation of influenza vaccination uptake (n=798,113 deliveries; 714,841 women), 33.5% of deliveries had influenza vaccination during influenza observation years 2017-2021, most (73.0%) of which occurred during influenza peak activity months (October-January) with approximately one-quarter (27.0%) of vaccinations having occurred during the off-peak months, mostly in September. CONCLUSIONS: In this large contemporary analysis of EHR data, uptake of Tdap vaccination during pregnancy was consistent with previously published estimates; notably, most vaccination occurred early in the recommended 27-36 wGA window. Maternal influenza vaccination uptake largely correlated with peak influenza activity months and not gestational age. These study findings may have important implications for estimating the potential uptake and impact of future maternal vaccines.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina Acelular , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Vacunas contra Virus Sincitial Respiratorio , Tos Ferina , Embarazo , Lactante , Femenino , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Vacunación , Vacunas Bacterianas , Tos Ferina/prevención & control
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA