Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 69
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis ; 34(6): 1371-1380, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38503618

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Studies have demonstrated that obesity is paradoxically associated with reduced mortality following cardiac surgery. However, these studies have treated various types of cardiac surgery as a single entity. With mitral valve (MV) surgeries being the fastest-growing cardiac surgical interventions in North America, the purpose of this study was to identify the impact of body mass index (BMI) on long-term survival and cardiac remodelling of patients undergoing MV replacement (MVR). METHODS AND RESULTS: In this retrospective, single-center study, 1071 adult patients who underwent an MVR between 2004 and 2018 were stratified into five BMI groups (<20, 20-24.9, 25-29.9, 30-34.9, >35). Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to determine the association between BMI and all-cause mortality. Patients who were underweight had significantly higher all-cause mortality rates at the longest follow-up (median 8.2 years) than patients with normal weight (p = 0.01). Patients who were in the obese group had significantly higher readmission rates due to myocardial infarction (MI) at the longest follow-up (p = 0.017). Subgroup analysis revealed a significant increase in long-term all-cause mortality for female patients who were underweight. Significant changes in left atrial size, mitral valve peak and mean gradients were seen in all BMI groups. CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing mitral valve replacement, BMI is unrelated to operative outcomes except for patients who are underweight.


Subject(s)
Body Mass Index , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Mitral Valve , Obesity , Ventricular Remodeling , Humans , Female , Male , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Time Factors , Mitral Valve/surgery , Mitral Valve/physiopathology , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Aged , Obesity/mortality , Obesity/physiopathology , Obesity/surgery , Obesity/complications , Obesity/diagnosis , Risk Assessment , Adult , Heart Valve Diseases/surgery , Heart Valve Diseases/mortality , Heart Valve Diseases/physiopathology , Cause of Death , Patient Readmission
2.
Heart Lung Circ ; 2024 Jun 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38942621

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The impact of sex on outcomes following surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) remains unclear. It has been proposed that females experience inferior outcomes, but this has yet to be conclusively established, particularly in the long term. The objective of this study is to identify discrepancies in postoperative outcomes between males and females following SAVR to better inform consideration for surgical intervention. METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 4,927 patients who underwent SAVR from 2004 to 2018 at our centre. In total, 531 propensity-matched males and females were included in the final analysis. The primary outcome was mortality at any point during the follow-up period. Secondary outcomes included various measures of postoperative morbidity. Follow-up duration was 15 years. RESULTS: In SAVR all-comers, females experienced inferior short-term mortality, but equivalent mid-term and long-term mortality. Rates of mediastinal bleeding, sternal wound infections, sepsis, heart failure, and pacemaker insertion were all equivalent between the sexes; however, males experienced a higher rate of acute kidney injury and readmission for stroke at the longest follow-up while females experienced a longer intensive care unit and hospital length of stay. In a sub-analysis of isolated SAVR, males and females experienced equivalent early, mid, and late mortality. Of note, a trend towards increased aortic valve reoperation was noted in females at the longest follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Males and females experience equivalent long-term mortality following isolated SAVR. Sex is not an independent risk factor of poor outcomes post-SAVR; however, the increased preoperative risk profile of females requires diligent consideration.

3.
Artif Organs ; 47(11): 1752-1761, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37476924

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Short-term continuous flow (STCF) ventricular assist devices (VADs) are utilized in adults with cardiogenic shock; however, mortality remains high. Previous studies have found that high pre-operative MELD-XI scores in durable VAD patients are associated with mortality. The use of the MELD-XI score to predict outcomes in STCF-VAD patients has not been explored. We sought to determine the relationship between MELD-XI and outcomes in adults with STCF-VADs. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of adults implanted with STCF-VADs between 2009 and 2019. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to predict outcomes and Kaplan-Meier analysis was done to assess survival. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients were included with a median MELD-XI score of 21.2 (IQR 13.5, 27.0). Patients with an unsuccessful wean from support (p < 0.001) or major post-operative bleeding (p = 0.03) had significantly higher pre-implant MELD-XI scores. The optimal MELD-XI cut-point for mortality was 24.9 with 27.8 for major bleeding. Survival was worse among patients in the high-risk MELD-XI group, however, not statistically significant (p = 0.09). Prior ECMO support, but not MELD-XI, was an independent predictor of unsuccessful wean (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operative MELD-XI score was a moderate predictor of unsuccessful wean with limited utility in predicting bleeding in patients on STCF-VAD support. This scoring system may be useful in the clinical setting for pre-implant risk stratification and counseling among patients and outcomes.


Subject(s)
End Stage Liver Disease , Heart Failure , Heart Transplantation , Heart-Assist Devices , Adult , Humans , Heart-Assist Devices/adverse effects , Liver , Retrospective Studies , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Prognosis , End Stage Liver Disease/complications , Severity of Illness Index , Heart Failure/surgery , Heart Failure/complications
4.
Can J Surg ; 66(2): E139-E149, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36931654

ABSTRACT

The apprentice model has traditionally been the primary method of teaching cardiac surgery trainees. Limitations of this model include insufficient time to learn all necessary skills, minimal exposure to rare cases and to complex repair techniques, small number of patients in small centres, high cost and absence of objective measures of feedback. In recent years, simulation-based training (SBT) has been used in order to address the gaps left by the apprentice model. We performed a systematic review of PubMed and Embase for articles investigating the use of SBT in teaching surgical valve techniques published in 2022 or earlier in order to summarize the current literature regarding the use of SBT for trainees learning surgical valve repair and replacement techniques. We compiled data on the impact of SBT on time to completion of tasks, proportion of trainees who committed technical errors, skills scores and theoretical knowledge. Studies in which outcomes were evaluated showed significant improvement in these measures after participation in SBT. Simulation-based training has been shown to improve the surgical skills of trainees in a rela-tively short period. As hands-on experience in the field of cardiac surgery is invaluable and often difficult to reproduce effectively, it is likely that a combination of hands-on training and SBT will be adopted moving forward to provide optimal exposure for surgical trainees.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Simulation Training , Humans , Learning , Clinical Competence , Heart Valves , Teaching
5.
Ann Surg ; 275(6): 1058-1066, 2022 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35081569

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to review the contemporary literature comparing CABG and PCI in diabetic patients providing an up-to-date perspective on the differences between the interventions. BACKGROUND: Diabetes is common and diabetic patients are at a 2-to-4-fold increased risk of developing coronary artery disease. Approximately 75% of diabetic patients die of cardiovascular disease. Previous literature has identified CABG as superior to PCI for revascularization in diabetic patients with complex coronary artery diseas. METHODS: PubMed and Medline were systematically searched for articles published from January 1, 2015 to April 15, 2021. This systematic review included all retrospective, prospective, and randomized trial studies comparing CABG and PCI in diabetic patients. 1552 abstracts were reviewed and 25 studies were included in this review. The data was analyzed using the RevMan 5.4 software. RESULTS: Diabetic patients undergoing CABG experienced significantly reduced rates of 5-year mortality, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, myocardial infarction, and required repeat revascularization. Patients who underwent PCI experienced improved rates of stroke that trended toward significance. CONCLUSIONS: Previous literature regarding coronary revascularization in diabetic patients has consistently demonstrated superior outcomes for patients undergoing CABG over PCI. The development of 1st and 2nd generation DES have narrowed the gap between CABG and PCI, but CABG continues to be superior. Continued investigation with large randomized trials and retrospective studies including long term follow-up comparing CABG and 2nd generation DES is necessary to confirm the optimal intervention for diabetic patients.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Diabetes Mellitus , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Coronary Artery Bypass , Coronary Artery Disease/complications , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/etiology , Humans , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
6.
Xenotransplantation ; 29(6): e12774, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36098060

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Current bioprosthetic heart valve replacement options are limited by structural valvular deterioration (SVD) due to an immune response to the xenogenic scaffold. Autologous mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) recellularization is a method of concealing xenogenic scaffolds, preventing recipient immune recognition of xenogenic tissue heart valves, and potentially leading to reduction in SVD incidence. The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of autologous MSC recellularized tissue on the immune response of human whole blood to bovine pericardium (BP). We hypothesized that autologous MSC recellularization of BP will result in reduced pro-inflammatory cytokine production equivalent to autologous human pericardium. METHODS: Bone marrow, human pericardium, and whole blood were collected from adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. Decellularized BP underwent recellularization with autologous MSCs, followed by co-incubation with autologous whole blood. Immunohistochemical, microscopic, and quantitative immune analysis approaches were used. RESULTS: We demonstrated that native BP, exposed to human whole blood, results in significant TNF-α and IL1ß production. When decellularized BP is recellularized with autologous MSCs and exposed to whole blood, there is a significant reduction in TNF-α and IL1ß production. Importantly, recellularized BP exposed to whole blood had similar production of TNF-α and IL1ß when compared to autologous human pericardium exposed to human whole blood. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that preventing initial immune activation with autologous MSC recellularization may be an effective approach to decrease the recipient immune response, preventing recipient immune recognition of xenogeneic tissue engineered heart valves, and potentially leading to reduction in SVD incidence.


Subject(s)
Mesenchymal Stem Cells , Tissue Engineering , Cattle , Humans , Animals , Tissue Engineering/methods , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha , Transplantation, Heterologous , Pericardium , Tissue Scaffolds
7.
Cardiology ; 147(3): 337-347, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35443246

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Inequalities in postoperative outcomes between males and females are well described with females often experiencing inferior outcomes after heart valve surgery. The recent literature has demonstrated equivalent or improved outcomes for females after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) and replacement (TMVR) is a relatively newer field with significantly less literature comparing sex differences. This systematic review and meta-analysis looks to provide a comprehensive summary of the published literature comparing outcomes between males and females undergoing transcatheter MV interventions. METHODS: PubMed, MEDLINE, and Scopus were systematically searched for all studies comparing outcomes between males and females undergoing TMVr and TMVR. A total of 2,178 English manuscript titles and abstracts were reviewed. Articles were excluded if data were not provided regarding sex differences, transcatheter MV intervention, full-length text was not accessible, or if insufficient data was provided. A total of 2,170 articles were excluded, and 8 articles were included in this study. RESULTS: Pooled estimates of outcomes demonstrated rates of acute kidney injury (OR 1.28 [95% CI, 1.14-1.44; p < 0.0001]) favored females, while rates of major bleeding favored males (OR 0.85 [95% CI 0.76-0.96; p = 0.01]). Rates of mortality, postoperative MI, and stroke did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION: A trend has emerged in heart valve interventions with males tending to have improved outcomes after surgical intervention and females experiencing equivalent or improved outcomes after transcatheter interventions. This meta-analysis identified increased rates of acute kidney injury for males, increased rates of major bleeding for females, and otherwise comparable morbidity and mortality in males and females undergoing TMVr.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Mitral Valve Insufficiency , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Cardiac Catheterization , Female , Humans , Male , Mitral Valve/surgery , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Sex Characteristics , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
8.
Cardiology ; 147(3): 348-363, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35500568

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is the primary cause of late mortality after heart transplantation. We look to provide a comprehensive review of contemporary revascularization strategies in CAV. METHODS: PubMed and Web of Science were systematically searched by 3 authors. 1,870 articles were initially screened and 24 were included in this review. RESULTS: PCI is the main revascularization technique utilized in CAV. The pooled estimates for restenosis significantly favored DES over BMS (OR 4.26; 95% CI: 2.54-7.13; p < 0.00001; I2 = 4%). There were insufficient data to quantitatively compare mortality following DES versus BMS. There was no difference in short-term mortality between CABG and PCI. In-hospital mortality was 0.0% for CABG and ranged from 0.0 to 8.34% for PCI. One-year mortality was 8.0% for CABG and 5.0-25.0% for PCI. CABG had a potential advantage at 5 years. Five-year mortality was 17.0% for CABG and ranged from 14 to 40.4% following PCI. Select measures of postoperative morbidity trended toward superior outcomes for CABG. CONCLUSION: In CAV, PCI is the primary revascularization strategy utilized, with DES exhibiting superiority to BMS regarding postoperative morbidity. Further investigation into outcomes following CABG in CAV is required to conclusively elucidate the superior management strategy in CAV.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Drug-Eluting Stents , Heart Diseases , Heart Transplantation , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Coronary Vessels , Heart Transplantation/adverse effects , Humans , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Treatment Outcome
9.
J Card Surg ; 37(9): 2752-2760, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35652892

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Valvular heart disease (VHD) is a prominent problem in healthcare today with mitral regurgitation (MR) being the leading cause of VHD in the elderly population. While mitral valve repair (MVr) surgery is one of the only options for the end-stage disease, octogenarians are often denied MVr due to concerns with operative mortality and postoperative morbidity. To provide information on this underrepresented group of surgical patients, a systematic approach was taken to review the mortality and morbidity rates of octogenarians who received MVr. METHODS: Pubmed and Medline were searched for articles containing outcomes of octogenarians receiving surgical mitral valve repair (SMVr) or transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) published after 2000. Ten articles met the inclusion criteria for a total of 7968 patients included in the analysis using Microsoft Excel, Version 2105. RESULTS: Short-term mortality rates for SMVr and TMVr were 2.6% and 1.4% for in-hospital, and 7.8% and 3.3% for 30 days, respectively. The average incidence of stroke, acute kidney injury, infection, and major bleeding for SMVr were 3.2%, 11.2%, 7.7%, and 24%, respectively, and 0.3%, 6.7%, 2.7%, and 7.9% for TMVr, respectively. CONCLUSION: Octogenarians receiving SMVr or TMVr experienced similar rates of short-term mortality and morbidity as younger populations, and when considering life expectancy, midterm mortality was also similar. With these results, denying octogenarians MVr operations based on age alone should be reconsidered. Depending on risk factors and comorbidities, either SMVr or TMVr is a viable and relatively safe option for octogenarians with severe MR.


Subject(s)
Heart Valve Diseases , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Mitral Valve Insufficiency , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Heart Valve Diseases/surgery , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Humans , Mitral Valve/surgery , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/etiology , Morbidity , Octogenarians , Treatment Outcome
10.
Int J Obes (Lond) ; 45(12): 2679-2687, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34373569

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Previous literature has demonstrated equivalent or improved survival post mitral valve (MV) surgery amongst patients with obesity when compared to their normal-weight counterparts. This relationship is poorly understood and the impact of body mass index (BMI) on cardiac remodeling has not been established. METHODS: In this retrospective, single-center study, we sought to identify the impact that BMI may have on long-term outcomes and cardiac remodeling post-MV repair. Outcomes were compared between patients of varying BMI undergoing MV repair between 2004 and 2018. The primary outcome was mortality and secondary outcomes included stroke, myocardial infarction, reoperation of the MV, rehospitalization, and cardiac remodeling. RESULTS: A total of 32 underweight, 249 normal weight, 249 overweight, 121 obese, and 50 morbidly obese patients were included in this study. Underweight patients had increased mortality at longest follow-up. Patients with morbid obesity were found to have higher rates of readmission for heart failure. Only underweight patients did not demonstrate a significant reduction in LVEF. Patients with normal weight and overweight had a significant reduction in left atrial size, and patients with obesity had a significant reduction in MV area. CONCLUSIONS: An obesity paradox has been identified in cardiac surgery. While patients with obesity have higher rates of comorbidities preoperatively, their rates of mortality are equivalent or even superior to those with lower BMI. The results of our study confirm this finding with patients of high BMI undergoing MV repair demonstrating equivalent rates of morbidity to their normal BMI counterparts. While the obesity paradox has been relatively consistent in the literature, the understanding of its cause and long-term impacts are not well understood. Further focused investigation is necessary to elucidate the cause of this relationship.


Subject(s)
Atrial Remodeling/physiology , Body Mass Index , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Time , Ventricular Remodeling/physiology , Aged , Alberta , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mitral Valve/surgery , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/physiopathology , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
11.
Scand J Immunol ; 93(4): e13018, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33372305

ABSTRACT

Valvular heart disease continues to afflict millions of people around the world. In many cases, the only corrective treatment for valvular heart disease is valve replacement. Valve replacement options are currently limited, and the most common construct utilized are xenogenic tissue heart valves. The main limitation with the use of this valve type is the development of valvular deterioration. Valve deterioration results in intrinsic permanent changes in the valve structure, often leading to hemodynamic compromise and clinical symptoms of valve re-stenosis. A significant amount of research has been performed regarding the incidence of valve deterioration and determination of significant risk factors for its development. As a result, many believe that the underlying driver of valve deterioration is a chronic immune-mediated rejection process of the foreign xenogenic-derived tissue. The underlying mechanisms of how this occurs are an area of ongoing research and active debate. In this review, we provide an overview of the important components of the immune system and how they respond to xenografts. A review of the proposed mechanisms of xenogenic heart valve deterioration is provided including the immune response to xenografts. Finally, we discuss the role of strategies to combat valve degeneration such as preservation protocols, epitope modification and decellularization.


Subject(s)
Heart Valve Diseases/immunology , Heart Valves/immunology , Heterografts/immunology , Immunity/immunology , Animals , Hemodynamics/immunology , Humans
12.
Curr Opin Cardiol ; 36(5): 652-660, 2021 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34009807

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to compare outcomes of males and females undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), off-pump CABG (OPCAB), minimally invasive direct CABG (MIDCAB), and robotic total endoscopic CABG (TECAB). RECENT FINDINGS: Females demonstrated increased rates of morbidity and mortality post PCI and CABG. In studies that performed risk adjustments, these differences were reduced. Although inferior outcomes were observed for females in some measures, generally outcomes between males and females were comparable post OPCAB, MIDCAB, and TECAB. SUMMARY: Previous literature has demonstrated that females undergoing coronary revascularization experience inferior postoperative outcomes when compared to their male counterparts. The discrepancies between males and females narrow, but do not disappear when preoperative risks are accounted for and when considering minimally invasive approaches such as MIDCAB, OPCAB, and TECAB. Minimally invasive cardiac surgery has demonstrated numerous benefits with reduced morbidity, mortality, and shorter recovery times. In patients with increased comorbidities, minimally invasive approaches confer a greater advantage. As females often fall within this category, it is paramount that the diagnosis and referral process be optimized to account for preoperative differences to provide the most beneficial approach if the disparity between the sexes is to be addressed.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Bypass, Off-Pump , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Coronary Artery Bypass , Female , Humans , Male , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures , Treatment Outcome
13.
Curr Opin Cardiol ; 36(2): 163-171, 2021 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33044266

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We summarize the recent developments in transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) and replacement (TMVR), discuss determinants of MitraClip outcomes in various mitral regurgitation causes, and highlight newly emerging devices and randomized trials. RECENT FINDINGS: The discordant results published in the two recent randomized trials for MitraClip, the COAPT and the MITRA-FR trial have led to the emergence of a new conceptual framework such as the proportionate versus disproportionate mitral regurgitation and hemodynamics assessment tools like the real-time continuous left atrial pressure monitoring. Learning curve and volume-outcome analyses and studies examining the MitraClip usage in patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation are recent developments that have influenced MitraClip regulation and coverage. Several trials for TMVr devices that take an alternative approach to the edge-to-edge repair are underway and advancements in the TMVR technologies are continuing to progress to fill the unmet needs of treating high surgical risk patients whose complex valve anatomy make TMVr unfeasible. SUMMARY: Evidence supports careful analysis of the valve area and left ventricular function in addition to the left atrial hemodynamics will improve the MitraClip outcome. Operator experience plays a greater effect when achieving excellent results with 1+ or less residual mitral regurgitation whereas surgical MVr volume did not influence TMVr outcome. Interventions on the complex primary mitral regurgitation remain under the surgical domain, but MITRA high risk (HR) and REPAIR mitral regurgitation trials are underway to evaluate the role of MitraClip in high to intermediate surgical risk patients with primary mitral regurgitation. Despite the slow developments in TMVR, the results of the early trials of its devices are promising.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Mitral Valve Insufficiency , Cardiac Catheterization , Heart Failure/surgery , Humans , Mitral Valve/diagnostic imaging , Mitral Valve/surgery , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Treatment Outcome
14.
J Card Surg ; 36(2): 565-572, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33350520

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Differences in cardiac remodeling after mitral valve (MV) surgery between the sexes is poorly understood. Inferior outcomes for females undergoing MV surgery compared with males have been suggested in the literature, although causative factors behind this discrepancy have not been identified. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this propensity-matched, retrospective, single-center study, we sought to identify the impact that sex may have on cardiac remodeling and long-term outcomes to better inform clinical decision-making in MV surgical intervention. Outcomes were compared between males and females undergoing MV replacement (MVR) between 2004 and 2018. The primary outcome was cardiac remodeling 1 year postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), reoperation of the MV, and rehospitalization. RESULTS: A total of 311 males and 311 females were included after propensity matching. Both groups demonstrated significant improvement in left atrial remodeling, although only males demonstrated a significant degree of improved left ventricular remodeling while their female counterparts did not. Mortality rates were relatively equivalent between the two groups, although males were more likely to develop sepsis and require rehospitalization due to MI. CONCLUSIONS: There has been little research exploring the differences in cardiac remodeling between the sexes after MVR. The results of this study have suggested that MVR is equally safe for both sexes and has demonstrated a difference in the heart's ability to remodel after MVR. The significance of this difference has the potential to result in largely different clinical outcomes for males and females. Further study is necessary to fully elucidate this relationship.


Subject(s)
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Mitral Valve Insufficiency , Female , Humans , Male , Mitral Valve/surgery , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Ventricular Remodeling
15.
Curr Opin Cardiol ; 35(5): 559-565, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32649351

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to compare outcomes of surgical valve replacement (SVR) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) SVR and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and transcatheter aortic valve replacement and PCI for the treatment of combined coronary artery disease (CAD) and valvular heart disease (VHD). RECENT FINDINGS: Several studies have attempted to identify key differences in outcomes with hybrid MICS SVR and PCI approaches to combined CAD and VHD. Recent studies have demonstrated that MICS SVR and PCI, when compared with conventional open SVR and CABG, demonstrate reduced or unchanged morbidity and mortality. However, the rate of bleeding in MICS SVR and PCI is consistently higher likely because of the effects of antiplatelet therapy. SUMMARY: A shift toward MICS has occurred in the preceding decades, with outcomes improving in recent years. With limited ability to perform CABG through MICS approaches, attempts have been made at hybrid procedures to address multiple presenting concerns while allowing for the benefits of MICS approaches. Hybrid MICS SVR and PCI approaches may provide suitable alternatives to traditional surgical approaches with reduced intra and postoperative morbidity and mortality, with the notable exception of bleeding complications.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Heart Valve Diseases , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Coronary Artery Bypass , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Heart Valve Diseases/surgery , Humans , Treatment Outcome
16.
Curr Opin Cardiol ; 35(2): 101-106, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31834031

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this review, we summarize the history of mitral valve repair, discuss the broad principles of neochord preparation and implantation, and highlight comparative outcomes between mitral valve repair strategies while focusing on the risk of neochordal rupture. RECENT FINDINGS: There have been several recent studies comparing outcomes been leaflet-resection and nonresection, neochord-based mitral valve repair. Operative mortality was very low regardless of repair strategy; however, the rate of mitral valve reoperation is lower in those that undergo a neochord-based repair with overall lower mean mitral gradients postrepair. The introduction of minimally invasive approaches to mitral valve repair has preferentially favored an increase in neochord-based repair, given the technical simplicity compared with resection-based approaches. In very rare cases, neochord rupture can occur, likely secondary to a combination of chordal calcification and mechanical stress. SUMMARY: The method of performing mitral valve repair with neochord implantation has demonstrated superior durability over leaflet resection approaches with equivalent operative outcomes. Although the risk of neochord rupture exists, it is exceedingly rare, and should not be considered a limitation to a neochord-based mitral valve repair. Recurrent mitral regurgitation secondary to neochord rupture is incredibly rare; however, regular echocardiographic evaluation of these patients appears warranted, especially when follow-up extends over 10 years.


Subject(s)
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Mitral Valve Prolapse/surgery , Humans , Mitral Valve/surgery , Reoperation , Respect , Treatment Outcome
17.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 20(1): 255, 2020 05 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32471345

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Most of the studies of obesity and postoperative outcome have looked predominantly at coronary artery bypass grafting with fewer focused on valvular disease. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing aortic valve replacement stratified by body mass index (BMI, kg/m^2). METHODS: The Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease registry captured 4780 aortic valve replacements in Alberta, Canada from January 2004 to December 2018. All recipients were stratified by BMI into five groups (BMI: < 20, 20-24.9, 25-29.9, 30-34.9, and > = 35). Log-rank test and Cox regression were used to examine the crude and adjusted survival differences. RESULTS: Intra-operative clamp time and pump time were similar among the five groups. Significant statistical differences between groups existed for the incidence of isolated AVR, AVR and CABG, hemorrhage, septic infection, and deep sternal infection (p < 0.05). While there was no significant statistical difference in the mortality rate across the BMI groups, the underweight AVR patients (BMI < 20) were associated with increased hazard ratio (1.519; 95% confidence interval: 1.028-2.245) with regards to all-cause mortality at the longest follow-up compared with normal weight patients. CONCLUSION: Overweight and obese patients should be considered as readily for AVR as normal BMI patients.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Aortic Valve/surgery , Body Mass Index , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Obesity/complications , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alberta , Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/mortality , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis/mortality , Databases, Factual , Female , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity/diagnosis , Obesity/mortality , Operative Time , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
18.
J Card Surg ; 35(7): 1653-1656, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32353904

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Atrial septal defects with anomalous venous connections are commonly repaired via sternotomy, requiring careful baffle reconstruction to redirect pulmonary venous return and ensure a durable result. The cosmetically appealing periareolar incision may provide an esthetically superior alternative to the anterolateral minithoracotomy incision used in minimally invasive cardiac surgery. METHODS: We describe a patient with a sinus venosus atrial septal defect and partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection who underwent successful minimally invasive, endoscopic repair with apical vein translocation and autologous pericardial baffle reconstruction through a periareolar approach. RESULTS: Post-operative echocardiography demonstrated excellent results with no residual shunt and a widely patent baffle and preserved biventricular function. At 1-year post-op, our patient has had a greatly improved quality of life and an excellent cosmetic result with normal nipple-areolar sensation. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that periareolar approaches should be considered for all adult patients with simple and complex atrial septal defects.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures/methods , Endoscopy/methods , Heart Septal Defects, Atrial/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Pulmonary Veins/abnormalities , Pulmonary Veins/surgery , Adult , Echocardiography , Female , Heart Septal Defects, Atrial/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Pulmonary Veins/diagnostic imaging , Quality of Life , Sternotomy/methods , Treatment Outcome
19.
J Card Surg ; 35(10): 2657-2662, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32720337

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The opioid epidemic has become a major public health crisis in recent years. Discharge opioid prescription following cardiac surgery has been associated with opioid use disorder; however, ideal practices remain unclear. Our aim was to examine current practices in discharge opioid prescription among cardiac surgeons and trainees. METHODS: A survey instrument with open- and closed-ended questions, developed through a 3-round Delphi method, was circulated to cardiac surgeons and trainees via the Canadian Society of Cardiac Surgeons. Survey questions focused on routine prescription practices including type, dosage and duration. Respondents were also asked about their perceptions of current education and guidelines surrounding opioid medication. RESULTS: Eighty-one percent of respondents reported prescribing opioids at discharge following routine sternotomy-based procedures, however, there remained significant variability in the type and dose of medication prescribed. The median (interquartile range) number of pills prescribed was 30 (20-30) with a median total dose of 135 (113-200) Morphine Milligram Equivalents. Informal teaching was the most commonly reported primary influence on prescribing habits and a lack of formal education regarding opioid prescription was associated with a higher number of pills prescribed. A majority of respondents (91%) felt that there would be value in establishing practice guidelines for opioid prescription following cardiac surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Significant variability exists with respect to routine opioid prescription at discharge following cardiac surgery. Education has come predominantly from informal sources and there is a desire for guidelines. Standardization in this area may have a role in combatting the opioid epidemic.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Opioid-Related Disorders/etiology , Opioid-Related Disorders/prevention & control , Pain Management/methods , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Substance-Related Disorders/etiology , Substance-Related Disorders/prevention & control , Surveys and Questionnaires , Training Support , Canada/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Opioid-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Patient Discharge , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Surgeons
20.
Clin Transplant ; 33(11): e13720, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31556148

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We report on overall survival and valve-related outcomes after bioprosthetic valve replacement in prior transplant recipients. METHODS: From January 2004 to December 2018, 20 consecutive patients (mean age 65.7-years, 90% male) with prior non-cardiac transplantation underwent bioprosthetic aortic (n = 18) or combined aortic and mitral (n = 2) valve replacement. Patients consisted of kidney (n = 14), lung (n = 2), liver (n = 3), and bone-marrow (n = 2) transplants with the most common indication for valve replacement being calcific degeneration (n = 12). Outcomes were measured over a 12-year span, with a median follow-up duration of 3.9 years. RESULTS: Overall survival at 30 days was 100% and at median follow-up was 60%. Acute kidney injury occurred in 50% (n = 10) with temporary dialysis required in 5% (n = 1) and 15% (n = 3) suffered respiratory failure. No patients experienced major bleeding, heart failure, or sternal wound infection. No patients required redo valve replacement during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide contemporary data demonstrating that patients with prior transplant can undergo bioprosthetic valve replacement with acceptable inhospital mortality rates and long-term survival, with a low rate of major morbidity. Furthermore, bioprosthetic valve replacement is a viable option in this group of patients with no redo valve replacement and acceptable long-term hemodynamic valvular function.


Subject(s)
Bioprosthesis/statistics & numerical data , Graft Survival , Heart Valve Diseases/mortality , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Heart Valve Diseases/pathology , Heart Valve Diseases/surgery , Humans , Male , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL