ABSTRACT
Inactivating variants in the centrosomal CEP78 gene have been found in cone-rod dystrophy with hearing loss (CRDHL), a particular phenotype distinct from Usher syndrome. Here, we identified and functionally characterized the first CEP78 missense variant c.449T>C, p.(Leu150Ser) in three CRDHL families. The variant was found in a biallelic state in two Belgian families and in a compound heterozygous state-in trans with c.1462-1G>T-in a third German family. Haplotype reconstruction showed a founder effect. Homology modeling revealed a detrimental effect of p.(Leu150Ser) on protein stability, which was corroborated in patients' fibroblasts. Elongated primary cilia without clear ultrastructural abnormalities in sperm or nasal brushes suggest impaired cilia assembly. Two affected males from different families displayed sperm abnormalities causing infertility. One of these is a heterozygous carrier of a complex allele in SPAG17, a ciliary gene previously associated with autosomal recessive male infertility. Taken together, our data indicate that a missense founder allele in CEP78 underlies the same sensorineural CRDHL phenotype previously associated with inactivating variants. Interestingly, the CEP78 phenotype has been possibly expanded with male infertility. Finally, CEP78 loss-of-function variants may have an underestimated role in misdiagnosed Usher syndrome, with or without sperm abnormalities.
Subject(s)
Alleles , Cell Cycle Proteins/genetics , Cone-Rod Dystrophies/genetics , Founder Effect , Hearing Loss/genetics , Infertility, Male/genetics , Mutation, Missense , Adolescent , Cell Cycle Proteins/chemistry , Cilia/metabolism , Cilia/ultrastructure , Cone-Rod Dystrophies/diagnosis , DNA Mutational Analysis , Female , Fibroblasts/metabolism , Genotype , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Humans , Infertility, Male/diagnosis , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Molecular , Pedigree , Phenotype , Protein Conformation , Structure-Activity Relationship , Syndrome , Exome SequencingABSTRACT
During their development, human T cells undergo similar genomic changes and pass through the same developmental checkpoints as developing thymocytes in the mouse. The difference between both species, however, is that some of these developmental stages are characterized by different phenotypic markers, and as a result, evidence emerges that the molecular regulation of human T cell development subtly differs from the mouse (Taghon et al., Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 360:75-97, 2021; Haddad et al., Immunity 24:217-230, 2006; Hao et al., Blood 111:1318-1326, 2008; Taghon and Rothenberg, Semin Immunopathol 30:383-398, 2008). In this chapter, we describe in detail how the different stages of human T cell development can be characterized and isolated using specific surface markers.
Subject(s)
Thymocytes , Thymus Gland , Humans , Mice , Animals , Cell DifferentiationABSTRACT
Not only is human T cell development characterized by unique changes in surface marker expression, but it also requires specific growth factors and conditions to mimic and study T cell development in vitro. In this chapter, we provide an overview of the specific aspects that need attention when performing T cell differentiation cultures with human hematopoietic and T cell progenitors.