Search details
1.
Characteristics associated with composite surgical failure over 5 years of women in a randomized trial of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
; 228(1): 63.e1-63.e16, 2023 01.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35931131
2.
Improved body image after uterovaginal prolapse surgery with or without hysterectomy.
Int Urogynecol J
; 33(1): 115-122, 2022 Jan.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34432089
3.
Effect of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension on treatment failure in women with uterovaginal prolapse: 5-year results of a randomized clinical trial.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
; 225(2): 153.e1-153.e31, 2021 08.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33716071
4.
Defining mechanisms of recurrence following apical prolapse repair based on imaging criteria.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
; 225(5): 506.e1-506.e28, 2021 11.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34087229
5.
Surgery for urinary incontinence in women: Report from the 6th international consultation on incontinence.
Neurourol Urodyn
; 38(2): 825-837, 2019 02.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30512219
6.
Effect of Vaginal Mesh Hysteropexy vs Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension on Treatment Failure in Women With Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
JAMA
; 322(11): 1054-1065, 2019 09 17.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31529008
7.
The female continence mechanism measured by high resolution manometry: Urethral bulking versus midurethral sling.
Neurourol Urodyn
; 37(5): 1809-1814, 2018 06.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29464812
8.
Updating Evidence for Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
JAMA
; 330(7): 599-600, 2023 08 15.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37581683
9.
Preoperative Urodynamic Parameters (Valsalva Leak Point Pressure and Maximum Urethral Closure Pressure), Urinary Collagen and Plasma Vitamin D Levels as Predictors of Mid Urethral Sling Surgery Outcome.
J Urol
; 196(3): 819-23, 2016 Sep.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27113967
10.
Midurethral slings: evidence-based medicine vs the medicolegal system.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
; 214(6): 708.e1-5, 2016 06.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27105683
11.
Long-term data support slings as the best surgical procedures for stress urinary incontinence.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
; 225(6): 591-592, 2021 12.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34844701
12.
The cost of preoperative urodynamics: A secondary analysis of the ValUE trial.
Neurourol Urodyn
; 35(1): 81-4, 2016 Jan.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25327775
13.
Measuring the impact of a posterior compartment procedure on symptoms of obstructed defecation and posterior vaginal compartment anatomy.
Int Urogynecol J
; 27(12): 1817-1823, 2016 Dec.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27230408
14.
Database Updates and Resulting Changes in Data in Study of Vaginal Mesh Hysteropexy vs Vaginal Hysterectomy.
JAMA
; 325(7): 695-696, 2021 02 16.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33591341
15.
A midurethral sling to reduce incontinence after vaginal prolapse repair.
N Engl J Med
; 366(25): 2358-67, 2012 Jun 21.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22716974
16.
A randomized trial of urodynamic testing before stress-incontinence surgery.
N Engl J Med
; 366(21): 1987-97, 2012 May 24.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22551104
17.
The female urinary microbiome in urgency urinary incontinence.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
; 213(3): 347.e1-11, 2015 Sep.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26210757
18.
Midurethral slings: which should I choose and what is the evidence for use?
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol
; 27(5): 359-65, 2015 Oct.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26308199
19.
Introduction to a new technology for measuring urethral pressures: 3D high-resolution manometry.
Int Urogynecol J
; 26(2): 299-300, 2015 Feb.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25366302
20.
Dynamic maximum urethral closure pressures measured by high-resolution manometry increase markedly after sling surgery.
Int Urogynecol J
; 26(6): 905-9, 2015 Jun.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25636909