ABSTRACT
Research coursework can be challenging for occupational therapy students, thus potentially compromising their engagement in learning. A student engagement framework was used to design and implement an innovative assignment called Researchers' Theater with a cohort of 38 first-semester occupational therapy students. At the beginning of each class, a small group of students led a creative activity to review topics from the preceding week. Student feedback survey results and instructors' observations suggest this framework contributed to students' affective, behavioral, and cognitive engagement. Findings also highlight the potential value of student-led, game-based learning for reinforcing course content.
Subject(s)
Occupational Therapy , Humans , Occupational Therapy/education , Curriculum , Students , Learning , Research , Male , Female , Problem-Based LearningABSTRACT
The use of mixed methods research (MMR) by health scientists has expanded in recent years. The growth of MMR reflects the complexity of health-related research questions including the need to understand stakeholder perspectives. MMR is further incentivized by the release of the National Institutes of Health's (NIH) first version of "Best Practices for Mixed Methods Research in the Health Sciences" in 2011 and their revised version which was released in early 2018, and the increase in federal funding awarded to MMR projects. Realizing the need to train health scientists, several training initiatives are underway. In this commentary, we discuss: characteristics of MMR; the rise of MMR in the health sciences; the growing need and efforts to train health scientists in MMR approaches; and the graduate-level course in MMR that was launched at the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy.
Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/methods , Research Design/trends , Research/education , Humans , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , United StatesABSTRACT
The designing, collecting, analyzing, and reporting of psychological studies entail many choices that are often arbitrary. The opportunistic use of these so-called researcher degrees of freedom aimed at obtaining statistically significant results is problematic because it enhances the chances of false positive results and may inflate effect size estimates. In this review article, we present an extensive list of 34 degrees of freedom that researchers have in formulating hypotheses, and in designing, running, analyzing, and reporting of psychological research. The list can be used in research methods education, and as a checklist to assess the quality of preregistrations and to determine the potential for bias due to (arbitrary) choices in unregistered studies.