Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry ; 33(1): 89-104, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36598585

RESUMEN

Cognitive impairments are proposed as predictors in the differentiation between subjects with psychosis risk syndrome (PRS) who will develop a psychotic disorder (PRS-P) and those who will not (PRS-NP). More in-depth study of the PRS-NP group could contribute to defining the role of cognitive alterations in psychosis. This study aims to analyze cognition of children and adolescents with PRS in terms of their clinical outcome at 18-month follow-up (psychosis, remission, and non-remission) and of determinate predictors of transition to psychosis and remission of PRS. The method is two-site, naturalistic, longitudinal study design, with 98 help-seeking adolescents with PRS and 64 healthy controls (HC). PRS-P (n = 24) and PRS-NP (n = 74) participants were clinically and cognitively assessed at baseline, and when full-blown psychotic disorder had developed or at 18-month follow-up. PRS-P subjects showed lower scores at baseline in processing speed, visuospatial memory, attention, and executive function (cognitive flexibility/processing speed) compared to HC. PRS-NP subjects showed lower baseline scores in verbal working memory and verbal fluency compared to HC. This deficit is also observed in the PRS group of participants still presenting attenuated psychotic symptoms at 18-month follow-up, while PRS subjects in remission showed a similar cognitive profile to HC subjects. Baseline score on processing speed, measured with a coding task, appeared to be a predictive variable for the development of a psychotic disorder. Performance in verbal working memory was predictive of remission in the PRS-NP. Post hoc comparisons indicate the need for careful interpretation of cognitive markers as predictors of psychosis. Cognitive impairments are present in both PRS-P and PRS-NP. Those individuals who recover from PRS show baseline cognitive performance comparable to the HC group. Together with sociodemographic variables, this observation could help in the differentiation of a variety of PRS trajectories in children and adolescents.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Psicóticos , Niño , Humanos , Adolescente , Estudios Longitudinales , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Trastornos Psicóticos/diagnóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Cognición , Síndrome
2.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 84(6)2023 10 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37870364

RESUMEN

Objective: To compare clinical and functional variables among 3 groups of children and adolescents: subjects at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-P) who also have obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS), CHR-P patients without OCS, and healthy controls (HC).Methods: A total of 128 CHR-P patients and 98 HC between the ages of 10 and 17 years were recruited as part of a multicenter prospective longitudinal study conducted in Spain between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2018, with diagnoses made for CHR-P using the Scale of Prodromal Symptoms (SOPS). Two groups were obtained based on Leyton Obsessional Inventory-Child Version (LOI-CV) scores: 64 CHR-P patients with OCS (OCS+) and 64 CHR-P patients without OCS (OCS-). Clinical variables were analyzed with a generalized linear model.Results: Overall, 128 CHR-P patients, 64 (50%) with OCS (mean ± SD age = 15.5 ± 1.4 years, 34.4% male), 64 CHR-P patients without OCS (mean ± SD age = 15.1 ± 1.9 years, 34.4% male), and 98 HC (mean ± SD age = 15.5 ± 1.5 years, 42.9% male), of whom 19 (19.5%) had OCS, were included. Generalized linear model analysis revealed significant differences between the groups. The OCS+ group showed more severe prodromal symptoms (P = .007), worse functioning at baseline (P = .044) and during the previous year (P = .004), and more dysmorphophobic symptoms (P < .001) compared to the OCS- group. OCS+ patients were also more frequently treated with antidepressants (P = .004) than were OCS- patients.Conclusions: In our sample, among children and adolescents with CHR-P, the prevalence of OCS was high (50%). OCS+ subjects had a more severe clinical and functional profile than OCS- subjects. Early detection and treatment of these symptoms can lead to better outcomes for these patients.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo , Trastornos Psicóticos , Humanos , Masculino , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Estudios Longitudinales , Estudios Prospectivos , Síntomas Prodrómicos , Trastornos Psicóticos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Psicóticos/epidemiología , Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo/diagnóstico , Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA