Clinical characteristics and disease course before and after SARS-CoV-2 infection in a large cohort of systemic sclerosis patients.

Background/aim: The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical presentations and adverse outcomes of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and assess the impact of SSc features on the clinical course of COVID-19. Materials and methods: In this multicenter, retrospective study, SSc patients with COVID-19 were included. Clinical features of SSc, along with detailed COVID-19 data, were extracted from medical records and patient interviews. Results: The study included 112 patients (mean age 51.4 ± 12.8 years; 90.2% female). SSc-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD) was evident in 57.1% of the patients. The findings revealed hospitalization in 25.5%, respiratory support in 16.3%, intensive care unit admission in 3.6%, and a mortality rate of 2.7% among SSc patients with COVID-19. Risk factors for respiratory failure, identified through univariate analysis, included ILD (OR: 7.49, 95% CI: 1.63-34.46), ≥1 comorbidity (OR: 4.55, 95% CI: 1.39-14.88), a higher physician global assessment score at the last outpatient visit (OR 2.73, 95% CI: 1.22-6.10), and the use of mycophenolate at the time of infection (OR: 5.16, 95 %CI: 1.79-14.99). Notably, ≥1 comorbidity emerged as the sole significant predictor of the need for respiratory support in COVID-19 (OR: 5.78, 95% CI: 1.14-29.23). In the early post-COVID-19 period, 17% of patients reported the progression of the Raynaud phenomenon, and 10.6% developed new digital ulcers. Furthermore, progression or new onset of dyspnea and cough were detected in 28.3% and 11.4% of patients, respectively. Conclusion: This study suggests a potential association between adverse outcomes of COVID-19 and SSc-related ILD, severe disease activity, and the use of mycophenolate. Additionally, it highlights that having comorbidities is an independent risk factor for the need for respiratory support in COVID-19 cases.

Human Leucocyte Antigen Genotyping in Celiac Disease: Reasons for Inappropriate Use.

BACKGROUND: Celiac disease (CD) is an autoimmune enteropathy, which may need further Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) testing beyond autoantibodies for diagnosis due to the necessity of lifetime gluten restriction. HLA genotyping test is useful in certain scenarios for CD diagnosis and screening. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reasons for inappropriate requesting of HLA testing. METHODS: One hundred and fifteen patients, who had been tested for CD-related HLAs, were included in this study. Final diagnosis, indication of HLA test, serological and histopathological findings were re-evaluated to determine the inappropriate usage of HLA testing. RESULTS: Among all patients, 44 (38.2%) were diagnosed with CD according to their genotyping results. The frequency of DQ 2.5, DQ8 and DQ2.2 haplotypes among these patients was 57.2%, 28.2%, and 14.3%, respectively. HLA test was performed inappropriately in 35 (30.4%) of patients. The most common reason was serology and pathological findings of patients were already conclusive as CD in 15 (42.9%) patients. Serology negative patients were tested without any supporting finding of CD in 11 (31.4%) patients. Last identified reason was that patients whose serology and intestinal biopsy were not conclusive as CD in 9 (25.7%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Before requesting HLA typing test, patient's data should be thoroughly evaluated to confirm the need for test.