The predictive value of multiple electrode platelet aggregometry (multiplate) in adult cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this retrospective observational study is to analyze the value of multiple electrode platelet aggregometry (Multiplate analyzer, Verum Diagnostica, Munich) as a point-of-care (POC) device in adult cardiac surgical patients. METHODS: Two hundred and twenty-three cardiac surgical patients were analyzed preoperatively and postoperatively with multiple electrode platelet aggregometry by stimulation ADPtest, ASPItest, and TRAPtest. End points were postoperative bleeding, need for reexploration, and perioperative transfusions requirements. Furthermore, a literature survey using the key phrases "platelet function" and "cardiac surgery" was performed. RESULTS: When comparing patients with normal Multiplate test results concerning end points, patients with pathological ADPtest (n = 140) needed significant more platelet concentrates (PCs) (p = 0.009), patients with pathological ASPItest (n = 175) did not show any significant differences, and patients with pathological TRAPtest (n = 139) needed more red blood cells (p = 0.008) and PCs (p = 0.02). The literature survey showed 208 hits, spanning the publication years 2002 to 2012 resulted in 123 hits. CONCLUSIONS: The ADPtest and the TRAPtest significantly predict the requirement of perioperative blood transfusion. Therefore, multiple electrode platelet aggregometry is beneficial for POC testing in cardiac surgical patients. Prospective, randomized, and controlled clinical studies are rare.

Cardiac surgery antibiotic prophylaxis and calculated empiric antibiotic therapy.

BACKGROUND: Ongoing debate exists concerning the optimal choice and duration of antibiotic prophylaxis as well as the reasonable calculated empiric antibiotic therapy for hospital-acquired infections in critically ill cardiac surgery patients. METHODS: A nationwide questionnaire was distributed to all German heart surgery centers concerning antibiotic prophylaxis and the calculated empiric antibiotic therapy. RESULTS: The response to the questionnaire was 87.3%. All clinics that responded use antibiotic prophylaxis, 79% perform it not longer than 24 h (single-shot: 23%; 2 doses: 29%; 3 doses: 27%; 4 doses: 13%; and >5 doses: 8%). Cephalosporin was used in 89% of clinics (46% second-generation, 43% first-generation cephalosporin). If sepsis is suspected, the following diagnostics are performed routinely: wound inspection 100%; white blood cell count 100%; radiography 99%; C-reactive protein 97%; microbiological testing of urine 91%, blood 81%, and bronchial secretion 81%; procalcitonin 74%; and echocardiography 75%. The calculated empiric antibiotic therapy (depending on the suspected focus) consists of a multidrug combination with broad-spectrum agents. CONCLUSION: This survey shows that existing national guidelines and recommendations concerning perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis and calculated empiric antibiotic therapy are well applied in almost all German heart centers.

Gentamicin-collagen sponge reduces sternal wound complications after heart surgery: a controlled, prospectively randomized, double-blind study.

OBJECTIVE: Prophylactic retrosternal placement of a gentamicin-collagen sponge has been the subject of several recent clinical studies and is a matter of controversy. The present study is the first controlled, prospective, randomized, double-blind, single-center study to investigate the efficacy of a retrosternal gentamicin-collagen sponge in reducing sternal wound complications after heart surgery. METHODS: From June 2009 to June 2010, 720 consecutive patients who underwent median sternotomy were assigned to a control placebo group (collagen sponge) or an intervention group (gentamicin-collagen sponge). All patients received guideline-compliant perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. The primary end point was the occurrence of deep sternal wound infections within 30 days of index surgery (follow-up period). Secondary end points were the occurrence of superficial sternal wound infections requiring treatment, as well as further clinical parameters, including revision, bleeding volume, and need for transfusions during the follow-up period. RESULTS: A total of 720 of 994 patients (72.4%) were enrolled (control group: n = 367 vs intervention group: n = 353). Risk factors for sternal wound infection and demographic variables were comparable in the 2 groups. The incidence of deep sternal wound infections was 13 of 367 (3.52%) in the control group versus 2 of 353 (0.56%) in the intervention group (P = .014; adjusted odds ratio, 0.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.69). The numbers needed to treat relation for all sternal wound infections and deep sternal wound infections were 26 and 33, respectively. No statistically significant differences were demonstrated concerning secondary end points, such as postoperative bleeding and transfusion of red cell units, thrombocytes, and fresh-frozen plasma. CONCLUSIONS: Routine prophylactic retrosternal use of a gentamicin-collagen sponge in patients undergoing cardiac surgery significantly reduces deep sternal wound infections.

Policies of withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in critically ill patients on cardiac intensive care units in Germany: a national survey.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the decision-making process of withholding and/or withdrawal (WH/WD) of life-sustaining treatment in cardiac intensive care units (ICUs) in Germany. METHODS: A questionnaire regarding 16 medical and 6 ethical questions of WH/WD of life-sustaining treatment was distributed to the clinical director, senior ICU physician and head nurses of all German heart surgery centres (n = 237 questionnaires). Furthermore, we present a literature survey using the key words 'End-of-life care AND withholding/withdrawal of life support therapy AND intensive care unit'. RESULTS: We received replies from 86 of 237 (36.3%) contacted persons. Concerning medical reasons, cranial computed tomography (CCT) with poor prognosis (91.9%), multi-organ failure (70.9%) and failure of assist device therapy (69.8%) were the three most frequently cited medical reasons for WH/WD life-sustaining treatment. Overall, 32.6% of persons answered that ethical aspects influence their decision-making processes. Poor expected quality of life (48.8%), the patient's willingness to limit medical care (40.7%) and the families' choice (27.9%) were the top three reported ethical reasons. There was a significant difference regarding the perception of the three involved professional groups concerning the decision-making parameters: multi-organ failure (P = 0.018), failure of assist device therapy (P = 0.001), cardiac index (P = 0.009), poor expected quality of life (P = 0.009), the patient's willingness to limit medical care (P = 0.002), intraoperative course (P = 0.054), opinion of family members (P = 0.032) and whether decision-making process are done collaboratively (clinical director, 45.7%; ICU physician, 52%; and head of nursing staff, 26.9%). Palliation medication in patients after WH/WD of life-support consisted of morphine (92%) and benzodiazepines (88%). CONCLUSIONS: This survey is a step towards creating standards of end-of-life care in cardiac ICUs, which may contribute to build consensus and avoid conflicts among caregivers, patients and families at each step of the decision-making process.