Entirely robotic cochlear implant surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Robot-assisted cochlear implant surgery (RACIS) as defined by the HEARO®-procedure performs minimal invasive cochlear implant (CI) surgery by directly drilling a keyhole trajectory towards the inner ear. Hitherto, an entirely robotic automation including electrode insertion has not been described yet. The feasability of using a newly developed, dedicated motorised device for automated electrode insertion in the first clinical case of entirely robotic cochlear implant surgery was investigated. AIM: The aim is to report the first experience of entirely robotic cochlear implantation surgery. INTERVENTION: RACIS with a straight flexible lateral wall electrode. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Electrode cochlear insertion depth. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The audiological outcome in terms of mean hearing thresholds. CONCLUSION: Here, we report on a cochlear implant robot that performs the most complex surgical steps to place a cochlear implant array successfully in the inner ear and render similar audiological results as in conventional surgery. Robots can execute tasks beyond human dexterity and will probably pave the way to standardize residual hearing preservation and broadening the indication for electric-acoustic stimulation in the same ear with hybrid implants.

Noise exposure of the inner ear during robotic drilling.

INTRODUCTION: Preserving the cochlear structures and thus hearing preservation, has become a prominent topic of discussion in cochlear implant (CI) surgery. Various approaches and soft surgical techniques have been described when approaching the inner ear. Robot-assisted cochlear implant surgery (RACIS) reaches the round window in a minimally invasive manner by following a trajectory of minimal trauma. This involves the drilling of a keyhole trajectory to the round window, through the facial recess, with no need for a complete mastoidectomy. It involves less drilling, less drilling time and less structural damage. A lot of attention has been paid to the structural traumatic causes of hearing loss but acoustic trauma during the exposure of the inner ear appears to be neglected topic. AIM: The aim was to measure the noise exposure of the inner ear during the robotic drilling of the mastoid and bony overhang of the round window. The results were compared with the milling in conventional cochlear implantation surgery. INTERVENTION: RACIS on fresh frozen human cadavers. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The equivalent frequency-weighted and time-averaged sound pressure level LAF in dB and the noise dose in % derived from a noise damage model, both obtained during RACIS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The robotic drilling of 6 trajectories towards the inner ear were performed, including 4 trajectories through round window access and 2 trajectories through cochleostomy. The results were compared with the data of 7 cases of conventional CI surgery that have been described in literature. The induced equivalent sound pressure level LAF was determined via an accelleration sensor at the zygomatic arch and a calibration according to bone conduction audiometry. A noise dose for the whole procedure was calculated from the equivalent sound pressure level LAF and the exposure time using a noise damage model. A noise dose of 100% is considered a critical exposure limit and values above are considered potentially harmful, with the risk of hearing impairment. RESULTS: The maximum LAF was 82 dB during fiducial screw placement; 87 dB during middle ear access; 95 dB for the accesses through the round window and 88 dB for the accesses through cochleostomy. The noise dose due to the HEARO®-procedure was always far below the critical value of 100%. There was no acoustic trauma of the inner ear in all cases with the noise dose being smaller than 0.1% in five out of the six cases. The maximum LAF in the seven cases of conventional CI surgery was 118 dB with a maximum cumulative noise dose of 172.6%. The critical exposure limit of 100% was exceeded in three cases of conventional CI surgery. CONCLUSION: RACIS provokes significantly less acoustic trauma than conventional mastoid surgery in our findings. There were no observable differences in noise exposure levels between a cochleostomy or a round window approach where the bony overhang needed to be drilled.

True keyhole cochlear implant surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Minimal invasive Robotic Assisted Cochlear Implant Surgery (RACIS) is a keyhole surgery by definition. It is therefore not possible to visualize the electrode array during insertion in the scala tympani. Hitherto, surgeons visualised the round window via the external auditory canal by folding over the tympanic membrane. However, the opening of a tympanomeatal flap is not minimal invasive and is especially in conventional cochlear implantation surgery not even necessary. Here we prove that image guided and robot assisted surgery can also allow correct electrode array insertion without opening the tympanomeatal flap. AIM: The aim is to report the first experience of robotic cochlear implantation surgery fully based on image guided surgery and without the opening of a tympanomeatal flap for electrode array insertion. INTERVENTION: RACIS with a straight flexible lateral wall electrode. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Electrode cochlear insertion depth with RACIS and autonomous inner ear access with full electrode insertion of a flexible lateral wall electrode array. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The audiological outcome in terms of mean hearing thresholds. CONCLUSION: After a series of 33 cases and after fine-tuning the insertion angles and yet another new version of planning software to depict the round window approach, a new clinical routine for inserting electrodes fully based on image guided surgery without opening a tympanomeatal flap was developed in robotic-assisted cochlear implant surgery.

More than 40 years of cochlear implant research: A bibliometric analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Cochlear implantation is the most effective treatment for patients with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss. Much scientific work has been published since their inception. There is a need for a critical reflection on how and what we publish on cochlear implantation. METHODS: All Science Citation Index Expanded featured articles between 1980 and 2022 with the word 'cochlear implants' or 'cochlear implantation' were collected from the Web of Science database. Separate characteristics, such as the publication dates, the journals, the number of citations, the countries of origin, the authors, the institutions and co-occurring keywords, were assessed. RESULTS: 13,934 articles were included in the data analysis. The journals of of Otology and Neurotology, Ear and Hearing and of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology represent the top three most publishing journals. Hannover Medical School, the University of Melbourne and the University of Northern Iowa represent the top three most publishing institutions. DISCUSSION: The amount of scientific publications on cochlear implant technology has increased for the last 40 years. Besides the focus on speech perception, the research landscape on cochlear implantation is broad and diverse. The number of countries and institutions contributing to these publications is limited. CONCLUSION: This bibliometric analysis serves as a quantitative overview of the research landscape on cochlear implantation.