Survival analysis of one-stage exchange of infected unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a single-center study with minimum 3 years follow-up.

PURPOSE: The rates of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are increasing yet little data exists regarding management of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) after UKA, particularly utilizing one-stage revision. The aim of this study was to determine the septic and all-cause revision-free survival of UKA PJIs treated with one-stage revision, as well as functional outcomes and risk factors for failure. METHODS: A retrospective review of one-stage septic revisions with a hinged or rotating hinged implant between 2000 and 2015 at a single institution was performed. Results of 15 patients with a minimum of 3-year follow-up (mean = 93 months; range 37-217) were evaluated by means of infection control, survivorship, patient reported functional score and possible causal factors for a re-revision. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analysis were used. RESULTS: After a mean of 8 years of follow-up infection control rate was 93.3%, the survivorship free of any reoperation, including both septic and aseptic causes, was 80% at 5 years and 64.2% at ten years and average Lysholm score was 72.7 ± 21.3 (33-100). CONCLUSION: One-stage revision for PJI of UKA using a hinged knee design has excellent infection-free survival at mid to long-term follow-up. Likewise, patient reported functional outcomes are promising. However, one-third of patients required aseptic reoperation and aseptic loosening was the dominant etiology.

What Is the Impact of Automated Synovial Cell Counting on Different Aseptic Causes and Periprosthetic Conditions Associated With Revision THA?

BACKGROUND: Studies have suggested that automated synovial cell counting may overestimate the white blood cell (WBC) count, resulting in false positive tests when evaluating patients for the possibility of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after THA. However, associations between WBC counts high enough to mimic PJI in patients whose arthroplasties are not infected but rather are experiencing a variety of aseptic problems-including but not limited to metallosis, polyethylene wear, and recurrent dislocation-have not, to our knowledge, been adequately addressed. In addition, there is a lack of analyses about the polymorphonuclear percentage (PMN%) when assessed by automated analyzers in this context. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: In the context of different indications for aseptic revision and different periprosthetic hip pathologic findings, we asked: (1) What were the synovial WBC count levels, and what proportion of values were above the 2018 International Consensus Meeting (ICM) cutoff (3000 cells/µL)? (2) What were the synovial PMN% levels, and what proportion of values were above the 2018 ICM (70%)? METHODS: We retrospectively studied the preoperative cell count analyses of synovial fluid in patients who underwent revision THA for aseptic reasons at our tertiary referral arthroplasty center between January 2015 and December 2017. We considered all revisions performed on patients during that time potentially eligible, and after prespecified exclusions were applied (exclusions mainly included 15% [197 of 1306] sporadic missing data and 12% [155 of 1306] insufficient synovial fluid obtained in the aspirate), a total of 702 patients undergoing revision THA for aseptic reasons remained for the final analysis. As far as we know, no patients underwent re-revision for PJI at a mean follow-up of 46 ± 11 months, which tends to confirm our impression that indeed these hips did not have PJI. Cell count analyses were conducted using an automated analyzer. Clinical findings, preoperative radiographs, and surgical reports--confirmed by available histologic results--were used to establish diagnoses. We evaluated these hips considering the recommendations of the 2018 ICM (WBC count of 3000 cells/µL and PMN% of 70%) to see what proportion of them would have been characterized as likely having PJI on basis of those cutoff values. The mean WBC count for the entire cohort was 2120 ± 2395 cells/µL. The mean PMN% for the entire cohort was 36% ± 22%. RESULTS: Compared with aseptic loosening and recurrent dislocation, polyethylene wear had the highest mean WBC count (3817 ± 3711 cells/µL; p < 0.001). Of the investigated periprosthetic conditions, wear-induced synovitis had the highest value (4464 ± 3620 cells/µL; p < 0.001). Considering the ICM threshold, polyethylene wear showed the highest proportion of WBC counts above 3000 cells/µL among the indications for aseptic revision (60% [25 of 42]; p < 0.001). Of the periprosthetic conditions, wear-induced synovitis showed the highest proportion beyond the ICM cutoff (60% [50 of 83]; p < 0.001). The mean PMN% for aseptic causes ranged between 28% and 44% without differences among them (p = 0.12). Patients with metallosis had the highest mean PMN% of the periprosthetic conditions investigated (45% ± 25%; p = 0.007). Regarding the ICM threshold, metallosis resulted in the largest proportion of patients with a PMN% above 70% (21% [10 of 47]; p = 0.003), and that for wear-induced synovitis was 6% (5 of 83; p = 0.42) and for osteolysis was 3% (1 of 33; p = 0.51). There were no differences among aseptic loosening, recurrent dislocation, and polyethylene wear in terms of the proportion above 70% among the aseptic revision causes. CONCLUSION: Using automated cell counting, we found that WBC counts differ widely across indications for aseptic revision THA, and a high proportion of patients who underwent revision THA for aseptic reasons had WBC counts above the commonly used threshold of 3000 cells/µL. However, the PMN% was much less affected in several common indications for aseptic revision THA, making this measure more reliable for interpreting aspiration results using an automated analyzer. Based on the data distributions we observed, manual counting techniques might be considered in particular among patients with polyethylene wear, metal-on-metal bearing surfaces, or suspected metallosis. However, an elevated WBC count alone, observed using an automated analyzer in the context of polyethylene wear, should not be considered to be strongly suggestive of PJI, since that finding occurred so commonly among patients without infection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.

High Rate of Reinfection With New Bacteria Following One-Stage Exchange for Enterococcal Periprosthetic Infection of the Knee: A Single-Center Study.

BACKGROUND: A wide range of success rates following the surgical management of enterococcal periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) with a tendency toward worse outcomes have been reported. However, the role of 1-stage exchange remains under-investigated. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate our results after the 1-stage knee exchange for enterococcal PJI. METHODS: Forty patients were retrospectively included between 2002 and 2017 with a mean follow-up of survivors of 80 months (range 22-172; standard deviation [SD] = 5). Polymicrobial infections occurred in 45% (18/40) of patients. Patients' characteristics, joint-related data, and antibiotic therapy were recorded. Rates of enterococcal infection relapse, reinfection with new microorganisms, and re-revision for any reason were determined. Bivariate analysis was conducted to identify risk factors of infection recurrence. RESULTS: Revision surgery was required in 22 cases (55%) with a mean time to revision surgery of 27 months (range 1-78; SD = 25). Indications for aseptic revisions (18%) included aseptic loosening (10%), periprosthetic fracture (5%), and patellar instability (3%). The most common cause of re-revision was a subsequent PJI (15/22; 68%) after a mean time of 22 months (range 1-77; SD = 24). Overall infection recurrence rate was 37.5% (15/40), substantially due to entirely non-enterococcal infections (9/15; 60%). Infection relapse with Enterococci occurred in 4 cases (10%) within 16 months postoperatively. Older patients (P = .05) and male gender (P = .05) were associated with a higher risk of infection recurrence. CONCLUSION: Overcoming the Enterococci using the 1-stage exchange for knee PJI is achievable but the rate of reinfection due to new microorganisms is high . However, the overall infection recurrence rate is comparable to other treatment approaches.

Preliminary clinical results of coated porous tibia cones in septic and aseptic revision knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: To analyze the first results of calcium-phosphate-coated porous tibia cones. METHODS: Patients treated with TrabecuLink®-CaP Cones were retrospectively recruited from January 2016 to December 2017. These custom-made cones were produced using titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4 V (Tilastan®) and using additive manufacturing with a special calcium-phosphate coating (HX®-coating). Clinical outcome was evaluated using Oxford Knee Score. For radiological evaluation of the implants, patients sent us outpatient taken radiographs. A minimum follow-up of one year was required. Lastly, we analyzed postoperative complications and revision rates. RESULTS: 52 patients with revision knee arthroplasty (RKA) were recruited for final analysis, of whom, we had 17 septic RKAs (33%) and 35 aseptic cases of RKA (67%). The bone defects were grouped into 17 AORI Type 2A (32.7%), 14 Type 2B (26.9%) and 21 Type 3 (40.4%). After a mean follow-up of 22 months (13.2-34.8; SD = ± 10), we had 4 surgical revisions (7.7%), 2 septic and 2 aseptic cases. The mean Oxford Knee Score was 28.6 points (8-47; SD = ± 10). 22 of 28 radiographs (78.6%) showed regular positioning of the cones and TKAs at a mean follow-up of 16.8 months (13.2-34.8; SD = ± 6). Three patients (10.7%) showed slight radiolucencies in the bone-cement interfaces and 3 patients (10.7%) had beginning heterotopic ossifications. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the initial clinical results of calcium-phosphate-coated tibia cones showing a good functional outcome. Further research should focus on long-term clinical and radiological follow-up.

Do patients with von Willebrand disease exhibit higher blood loss and revision rates in hip and knee arthroplasty? A case-control study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to compare the perioperative blood loss, need for transfusion and one-year revision rates in patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty who also have a diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD) with a matched control group. METHODS: A retrospective single-centre case-control study was conducted. Fifty-eight patients with VWD and 116 controls (1:2 match) who were operated for primary or revision hip and knee arthroplasty at our hospital were included. Blood loss, haemoglobin (Hb)-drop, need for blood transfusion, intraoperative complications and revision rates within one year were noted in all cases. Outcome measures for subgroups of the primary hip, primary knee, revision hip and revision knee procedures, were also analysed. RESULTS: The mean perioperative Hb-drop was 3.47 (±1.27) g/dL and blood loss was 293 (±97) ml for the VWD group while Hb-drop was 2.85 (±1.21) g/dL and blood loss was 232 (±105) mL for the control group (P < .001). There were no significant increased transfusion rates (P = .264) and revision rates in the VWD group (P = .634). Patients having primary hip surgery had significantly higher Hb-drop (3.68 ± 1.25 g/dL vs 2.62 ± 1.19 g/dL; P = .003), higher blood loss (293 vs 203 mL; P = .002) and increased need for a transfusion (21% vs 2.6%; P = .038) compared to the controls. No outcome measure was found to be significantly different for primary and revision knee surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that patients with VWD undergoing primary or revision total hip and knee arthroplasty have higher levels of blood loss than the control cohort. Perioperative protective measures including meticulous surgical techniques should be considered.

The 2018 International Consensus Meeting Minor Criteria for Chronic Hip and Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Validation From a Single Center.

BACKGROUND: Recently, a revised definition of the minor criteria scoring system for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) was developed by the second International Consensus Meeting on musculoskeletal infection. The new system combines preoperative and intraoperative findings, reportedly achieving high sensitivity and specificity. We aimed to validate the modified scoring system at a high-volume center. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent a revision total hip or knee arthroplasty at our institution from May 2015 to August 2018. Serum C-reactive protein, synovial white blood cell count and polymorphonuclear percentage, leukocyte esterase test, alpha-defensin, microbiological and histologic results, and documented existence of sinus tract and intraoperative purulence were available for all patients. Cases with at least 1 major criterion were considered as infected. Using the new minor criteria, a score of ≥6 reflects PJI, while a score <3 can be considered as noninfected. Sensitivity, specificity, mean accuracy (ACC), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 345 cases were included. A cutoff score of ≥6 points had the following diagnostic performance: area under the curve (AUC) = 0.90; ACC = 0.88; sensitivity = 0.96; specificity = 0.84; PPV = 0.70; NPV = 0.98. Diagnostic performance was better for the hip (AUC = 0.92; ACC = 0.90; sensitivity = 0.96; specificity = 0.86; PPV = 0.81; NPV = 0.98) than the knee (AUC = 0.89; ACC = 0.85; sensitivity = 0.95; specificity = 0.83; PPV = 0.59; NPV = 0.98). CONCLUSION: The modified scoring system proposed by the 2018 International Consensus Meeting in diagnosing PJI showed high sensitivity and a good performance, especially as rule-out diagnostic criteria. The cutoff level seems to be different between the hip and knee. Further validation studies considering the acknowledged limitations are recommended.

Midterm Results After Tantalum Cones in 1-Stage Knee Exchange for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Single-Center Study.

BACKGROUND: The use of tantalum cones to reconstruct extensive bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty has been established. We aimed to evaluate the midterm results after 1-stage knee exchange for periprosthetic joint infection using tantalum cones. METHODS: Seventy-two patients (mean age, 70 ± 8.2 years) treated with a 1-stage exchange for infected total knee arthroplasty using porous tantalum cones, between 2011 and 2016, were retrospectively included. Either rotating or pure hinge system in combination with femoral and/or tibial cones was used. Survivorship analysis (septic and aseptic) was performed. Prospectively, functional outcome was assessed at a mean follow-up of 49.9 ± 18.8 months (range, 24-88). RESULTS: A total of 15 patients (21%) were rerevised, 8 (11.1%) for infection and 7 (10%) for aseptic loosening, requiring cone exchange in 12 patients (17%). Cone-related survival free from any revision was 83% ± 3.8 standard deviation (95% confidence interval, 74-90), and infection-free survival was 89% ± 4.2 standard deviation (95% confidence interval, 76-93). No significant correlation was reported between the types of prosthesis used (P = .8) or implanted cones and failure (P = .6). History of a previous septic revision increased the risk of cone revision after the index surgery (P < .001). Preoperative Hospital for Special Surgery knee score improved from 47 ± 16 (range, 14-87) to 60 ± 17 (range, 24-84) points at the latest follow-up. CONCLUSION: First study reports on outcomes of the 1-stage exchange using tantalum cones for knee periprosthetic joint infection with additional severe bone loss. Midterm cone-related and infection-free survival offered good results and provided reasonable functional outcomes.

What are the Factors Associated with Re-revision After One-stage Revision for Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Hip? A Case-control Study.

BACKGROUND: Despite increased interest in one-stage revision arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip, the reported infection-free proportions after the one-stage approach are still comparable to that of two-stage revision. However, we still lack studies that analyze factors associated with any re-revision after one-stage revision arthroplasty for PJI. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: After one-stage revision arthroplasty for PJI of the hip, what factors were associated with an increased risk of re-revision, and what factors were associated with an increased risk of reinfection? METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective case-control analysis. Patients who underwent one-stage revision arthroplasty for PJI of the hip in our hospital between 2009 and 2017, and who were subsequently re-revised due to any reason, including reinfection, were identified from our electronic medical records. A total of 121 patients who underwent repeat revision for any reason after one-stage exchange for PJI of the hip were identified. The re-revision procedures were performed after a mean of 407 days. The primary reasons for re-revision were repeated hip dislocation in 53 of 121 patients (44%), reinfection including both new and persistent infections in 40 of 121 patients (33%), and aseptic loosening in 16 patients (13%). Forty-three patients underwent another revision procedure after the re-revision procedure (43 of 121; 36%). More than 40 potential patient-, joint- and surgery-related risk factors were investigated and compared with a 1:1 matched control participants by age, sex and year of the one-stage revision. Similar to the re-revision patients, controls were treated for PJI with one-stage revision arthroplasty; however, they did not undergo subsequent revision for any reason by the latest followup examination. The mean followup of the control group was 66 months (range, 17-119 months). The mean length of hospital stay was 26 days in the re-revised group (SD, 11.6 days) compared with 22 days for the controls (SD, 6.6 days). All analyses were performed to identify factors associated with general re-revision and reinfection. RESULTS: The independent factors associated with repeat revision for any reason were persistent wound drainage for at least 1 week (odds ratio [OR], 7.4; 95% CI, 2.6-20.6; p < 0.001), isolation of enterococci (OR, 4.8; 95% CI, 1.4-15.7; p = 0.010), and prior surgery due to infection before the one-stage hip revision (OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 2.0-6.4; p < 0.001). The factors associated with reinfection including both new and persistent infections were prolonged wound drainage (OR, 6.9; 95% CI, 2.2-21.5; p = 0.001) and prior surgery due to infection (OR, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.9-9.5; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged wound drainage after the one-stage revision arthroplasty for PJI of the hip must be treated rigorously. Patients with a history of a prior surgical procedure due to hip infection should be informed about the risk of further re-revision when deciding for the one-stage exchange. In case of enterococcal isolation, surgeons may consider another treatment approach rather than the one-stage exchange. Furthermore, we recommend the use of dual mobility cups when performing the one-stage revision hip arthroplasty to reduce the risk of dislocation.Level of Evidence Level III, therapeutic study.

Clinical Survivorship of Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Hinged Knees and Tantalum Cones at Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up.

BACKGROUND: The reconstruction of severe bone loss utilizing porous tantalum cones in patients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been established in the last years. However, reports on a long-term follow-up to assess the durability of such implants when combined with hinged knee designs are lacking. The current study aimed to evaluate the results of a previous study cohort at a minimum follow-up of 10 years. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed. The initial study cohort comprised of 38 patients who underwent aseptic revision TKA between 2007 and 2009 at a single institution. After exclusion of the deceased patients and patients who were lost to follow-up, 25 patients with hinged knees and 32 cones implanted were included with a minimum follow-up of 10 years (mean = 126.5 months, range 120-142, standard deviation [SD] = 5.92). Survivorship was determined, and re-revisions were observed. Functional Knee Society Score was assessed. RESULTS: After a minimum of 10 years, 24 of 32 cones (75%) had survived without any exchange in 18 patients. Reasons for cone revision included aseptic loosening (5/32 cones; 15.6%) and periprosthetic joint infection (3/32 cones; 9.4%). In 4 of the five revisions due to aseptic loosening, pure hinged knees had been implanted. The mean functional Knee Society Score of the survivors was 69.6 points (range 10-100, SD = 30.85), and the average flexion ability of the knee was 92° (range 30°-120°, SD = 22.09). CONCLUSION: Porous tantalum cones in revision TKA exhibited no favorable but reasonable long-term durability. Rotating-hinge designs should be used whenever possible to reduce the risk of aseptic loosening. Further comparative long-term analyses with other techniques or implants could inform us about the best treatment method.

Interprosthetic Femoral Sleeves in Revision Arthroplasty: A 20-Year Experience.

BACKGROUND: Interprosthetic femoral fractures in patients with ipsilateral stemmed total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be technically demanding to treat surgically. Nonunion and implant failure are among the main complications following fixation of interprosthetic femoral (IF) fractures. Total femoral arthroplasty (TFA) is associated with a high incidence of infection and instability. IF sleeves have been designed to avoid the disadvantages of these techniques and to provide a stable construct. The aim of this study was to present the results with this device from a single center. METHODS: We reviewed 26 patients who underwent revision arthroplasty procedures, using custom-made cemented IF sleeves between 1997 and December 2017 in our institution. Two-part sleeves were used in 18 patients and one-part sleeves in 8 patients. The most common indication was an IF fracture (18 patients). Patients were monitored for postoperative complications, implant failure, and re-revision. The minimum follow-up of the survivors with nonrevised sleeves was 12 months. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were included for the final analysis. The mean survivorship of the IF sleeve was 4.6 years at latest follow-up (mean 48.5 months; range 12 to 156). The overall rate of complications was 47.8%. The rate of mechanical failure was 21.7%. Late infections occurred in 3 patients (13%). At the latest follow-up, the mean Harris Hip Score was 69.9 points (range 39 to 94), and the mean functional Knee Society Score was 42.5 points (range 0 to 90), with average knee flexion of 95° (range 90° to 100°). CONCLUSION: The IF sleeve is a valid technique for the management of selected patients with IF fractures, particularly when a stable fracture fixation is not possible. Hip instability is not a concern, and functional improvement is achievable. Careful planning is required preoperatively to avoid mechanical failure.

Kellgren-Lawrence scoring system underestimates cartilage damage when indicating TKA: preoperative radiograph versus intraoperative photograph.

INTRODUCTION: The Kellgren-Lawrence score helps the orthopedic surgeon to classify the severity of knee osteoarthritis (OA) before total knee arthroplasty (TKA). There might be a discrepancy between subjective complaints of the patients and radiologically visible changes of the knee joint in many cases. In this context, we performed a prospective clinical study to compare the preoperative degree of knee OA using the Kellgren-Lawrence score with the intraoperative extent of cartilage damage during primary TKA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 251 primary TKA surgeries due to a primary knee OA were prospectively included. Preoperative Kellgren-Lawrence score was determined using standardized preoperative plain radiographs of three views; anteroposterior, lateral and skyline of the patella by a senior radiologist. Intraoperatively, in all cases, photographs of the medial, lateral, and patellofemoral joint compartments were taken. Using the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) score, the degree of chondromalacia was assessed. Subsequently, correlation analysis was performed using the Pearson-Clopper 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: There were higher intraoperative scores compared to the preoperative scores in 160 of all cases (63.7% of 251, 95% CI 57.5-69.7%). A mismatch of two score grade points was found in 8.4% (95% CI 5.3-12.5%). The most common mismatch was noted in patients with preoperative Kellgren-Lawrence score of 3 and an intraoperative score of 4 in 48.2% (95% CI 41.9-54.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative radiographs using Kellgren-Lawrence underestimate the severity of knee osteoarthritis. The true extent of articular cartilage damage can be better appreciated intraoperatively. In patients undergoing primary TKA, the correlation of clinical symptoms with radiological findings is crucial in deciding when to perform the surgery. Besides, other imaging modalities may be used as an adjunct when the clinical findings and plain radiographs do not correlate.

High bacterial contamination rate of electrocautery tips during total hip and knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to quantify the bacterial contamination rate of electrocautery tips during primary total joint replacement (TJR), as well as during aseptic and septic revision TJR. METHODS: A total of 150 electrocautery tips were collected between April and July 2017. TJR surgeries were divided into three groups: (1) primary, (2) aseptic and (3) septic revisions. In each group, a total of 50 electrocautery tips were collected. A monopolar electrocautery with a reusable stainless-steel blade tip was used in all cases. The rate of bacterial contamination was determined for all groups. Correlation of exposure time and type of surgery was analyzed. RESULTS: The overall bacterial contamination rate was 14.7% (95% CI 9.4 to 21.4%). The highest contamination rate occurred in the septic revision group (30.0%; 95% CI 17.9 to 44.6%), followed by the primary cases group (10.0%; 95% CI 3.3 to 21.8%) and the aseptic revision group (4.0%; 95% CI 0.5 to 13.7%). Exposure time did not affect the bacterial contamination rate. In 12 out of 15 (80%) contaminations identified in the septic group, we found the same causative microorganism of the prosthetic joint infection on the electrocautery tip. CONCLUSIONS: The bacterial contamination of the electrocautery tips is relatively high, especially during septic hip revision arthroplasty. Electrocautery tips should be changed after debridement of infected tissue.

Utility of histopathological examination in aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty: a preliminary analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The utility of a routine histopathological examination in aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) has not been well explored. We aim to describe the approach and present the results of histopathological examination, focusing on its clinical usefulness in the setting of aseptic revision THA. METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed 285 performed aseptic revision THA with available histopathological reports between 2015 and 2017 at a single institution. We described histopathological requests by the surgical team. Preoperative diagnoses, intraoperative findings, as well as histopathology and culture results were analysed. RESULTS: 13 painful THAs (4.5%) had preoperatively unknown diagnoses. In 10 of them, potential causes of pain were intraoperatively identified. Histopathology confirmed these findings in 8 THAs. 19 THAs (6.7%) revealed unexpected positive cultures (UPC). Histopathology was negative for infection in 18 of them. Among 16 consultants, 3 surgeons requested histopathology in 47% of the cases (130/285), usually to exclude infection (101/285; 35%). Documentation for tissue sample location was lacking in 51% (145/285), and for question asked by the surgeon in 47% (135/285). CONCLUSIONS: Histopathology is deemed a useful confirmatory tool in the context of ruling out infection in UPCs, and in documenting intraoperative findings in painful THAs with unknown preoperative diagnoses. Importantly, the approach to requesting histopathology should be optimised. Further large-scale studies, including cost analyses, are warranted to explore the usefulness of histopathology in routine utility.

First periprosthetic hip infection caused by Eggerthella lenta.

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) caused by anaerobic, Gram-positive bacilli is rare. We present here a case of an 83-year-old female patient who was admitted to our tertiary referral arthroplasty center to treat a complex PJI of her right hip joint after multiple failed surgeries. External and intraoperative cultures reveald growth of Eggerthella lenta (E. lenta). Microbiological identification was fast but in a very few samples. A successful management, comprising of radical debridement with one-stage exchange and an antibiotic treatment with multiple antibiotics, has been achieved at 24-month follow-up. To the best of our knowledge, we have provided the first case study of a hip PJI caused by E. lenta successfully treated with one-stage exchange and an adequate antibiotic treatment.

High re-revision rate following one-stage exchange for streptococcal periprosthetic joint infection of the hip.

INTRODUCTION: This study was undertaken to analyse the outcome of 1-stage exchange in the management of streptococcal periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip at a single hospital. METHODS: We identified 30 patients with a streptococcal PJI of the hip who had been treated by 1-stage exchange at our hospital between 2002 and 2017. Postoperative complications and the need for any subsequent re-revision for infection or other reasons were analysed. The Harris Hip Score (HHS) was evaluated at final follow-up. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 8.2 years (SD 4.1). The overall re-revision rate for any reason was 53% (16/30) at a mean 5.3 years (SD 0.68 years). Re-revision for infection was 20% (6/30) at a mean 1.8 years (SD 0.74 years). All re-revisions for PJI (6/6; 100%) were for relapse of the streptococcal infection. At final follow-up, the mean HHS was 68 points (SD 20). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of re-revision after 1-stage exchange for streptococcal PJI is high. Eradication of a streptococcal PJI of the hip remains challenging. Further extensive and comparative studies between 1-and 2-stage exchange are encouraged.

Do Not Postpone Revision of Worn Conventional Liners in Ceramic-on-Polyethylene Total Hip Arthroplasty: A New Dramatic Failure.

Catastrophic failure of ceramic-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty is still occasionally described. We report on a new case of complete atraumatic penetration of an intact ceramic head through the titanium cup in a cementless total hip arthroplasty due to dramatic polyethylene and metal wear. We reviewed the literature for similar cases and analyzed potential risk factors. Most importantly, revision of radiologically worn liners should not be postponed, especially in young and active patients with conventional liners, because the time to dramatic failure could be shorter than expected.

What to Do When Revision Procedures Fail to Prevent Recurrent Hip Dislocation in THA? A Novel Simple Technique for Selected Patients.

Failure to achieve postoperative stability is disappointing for both surgeons and patients after revision total hip arthroplasty. In particular, when available revision options have been exhausted. We describe our modification of previously reported surgical techniques without revising any component in a high-risk female patient with persistent hip dislocation despite multiple cup revisions using different implants. To stabilize the hip through the posterolateral approach, a synthetic polyethylene tube was used. This relatively simple, modified technique may be a solution in disappointing cases with failure to achieve hip stability in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Intravenous tranexamic acid is associated with safe reduced blood loss and transfusion rate in one-stage exchange for infected hip arthroplasty.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to investigate if the use of intravenous (IV) tranexamic acid (TXA) during one-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip that necessitates an extensive debridement is associated with decreased blood loss, if the rate of blood transfusion that may lead to side effects can be lowered with IV TXA, and if there is any difference regarding the occurrence of postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent one-stage exchange for PJI of the hip with perioperative IV administration of TXA (n=163; 90 males, 73 females; mean age 68±10.3; range, 25 to 90 years) between January 2015 and December 2016 and compared them to another group (n=190; 106 males, 84 females; mean age 71±10.1; range, 39 to 92 years) who underwent one-stage exchange for PJI of the hip without perioperative IV administration of TXA between January 2006 and December 2012. Blood loss, transfusion rates, amount of transfused blood, and occurrence of VTE complications were observed. RESULTS: Mean blood loss of the TXA group was significantly lower than that of the non-TXA group (2.4 L and 4.5 L, respectively; p<0.001). Patients in non-TXA group experienced significantly higher rate of blood transfusion (71.1% and 58.3%, respectively; p=0.014) and higher quantity of transfused packed red blood cells (3.2 and 1.9 units, respectively; p<0.001). There was one patient with VTE complication in each group. CONCLUSION: Even in the presence of infection, usage of IV TXA during one-stage exchange for PJI of the hip is associated with significantly lower blood loss and transfusion rates showing no higher risk of VTE events.