Role of Race/Ethnicity in Donor Decisions about Unrelated Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell Donation: Exploring Reasons for Higher Attrition among Racial/Ethnic Minorities.

There are more than 30 million potential unrelated hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) donors listed on international registries, but 30% to 50% are unavailable after matching a patient. In the United States racial/ethnic minorities opt out of donation at higher rates, and a previous study identified factors associated both with attrition and ethnic group membership. Attrition among minorities is also higher in the Anthony Nolan UK registry (35% in white British [WB] and 56% in nonwhite British [NWB]), but it is not clear what factors produce higher attrition in the United Kingdom and whether they are similar to those found in the United States. Three hundred fifty-seven UK potential donors who matched a patient completed a questionnaire. Key factors were compared by donation decision (continue or opt out) and by race/ethnicity (WB versus NWB). The pattern of UK results was compared with that of the previous US study for variables assessed in both studies. Across WB and NWB donors, higher attrition was associated with poorer physical/mental health, greater ambivalence, and more concerns about donation. Donors who opted out also reported less interaction with the registry, and 16% indicated that more interaction with the registry would have changed their decision. Those opting out of the registry and minorities were both more likely to report religious objections to donation and to mistrust the fairness of HPC allocation. The pattern of findings was similar in UK and US samples. Registries should maintain contact with potential donors after recruitment, aiming to educate members about the donation procedure and to address potential misconceptions associated with religious beliefs and HPC allocation.

Race and ethnicity in decisions about unrelated hematopoietic stem cell donation.

Large international registries of potential unrelated hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) donors, including the National Marrow Donor program (NMDP), continue to face difficulties finding matched donors for racial/ethnic minorities. One reason, in addition to the generally less common HLA types among minority patients, is the much higher registry attrition rate of racial/ethnic minorities compared with whites. Reasons for the higher attrition among minority potential donors remain unexplained. The goal of our cross-sectional telephone interview study was to generate a diverse sample of potential HSC donors who have preliminarily matched a patient and to identify factors associated with race/ethnicity and with the decision to continue toward potential donation or to opt out of the registry. Multiple culturally related, psychosocial, and donation-related factors were associated both with race/ethnic group membership and attrition from the registry. The most consistent factor associated with opting out of the registry across all race/ethnic groups was ambivalence about donation: doubts and worries, feeling unsure about donation, wishing someone else would donate in one's place. Our findings suggest that universal donor recruitment and management approaches based on reducing donation-related ambivalence and tailored messages and strategies for each of the individual race/ethnic groups are important.

Selection of adult unrelated hematopoietic stem cell donors: beyond HLA.

HLA matching is the dominant controllable donor-recipient factor determining the outcome of adult unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation. Beyond HLA, donor selection is often based on donor characteristics such as age, sex, parity, cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus, and ABO blood type. The published evidence to suggest these additional factors are important determinants of survival is weak and is sometimes conflicting. Other factors may be more important for optimal donor selection than the traditional non-HLA factors. These include the donor's geographic location, the performance history of the groups managing the donor, a priori knowledge of the donor's willingness/availability, and others. Implementation of tools to expose this additional donor-related information could significantly alter and aid unrelated donor selection practices.