[Out-of-hospital emergency medicine in Germany, Austria and Switzerland : randomized prospective studies from 1990 to 2012]. / Außerklinische Notfallmedizin in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz : Randomisierte, prospektive Studien von 1990 bis 2012.

BACKGROUND: Only randomized clinical trials can improve the outcome of life-threatening injuries or diseases but observations from England and North America suggest that the number of such randomized clinical trials is decreasing. In this study contributions from German speaking countries with regards to randomized clinical trials in emergency medicine over the last 22 years were investigated. METHODS: The Medline database was searched from January 1990 to December 2012 for prospective randomized clinical trials in the prehospital setting using the criteria "cardiac arrest", "cardiopulmonary resuscitation", "multiple trauma", "hemorrhagic shock", "head trauma", "stroke" as well as myocardial infarction and emergency medical service. Only studies originating from Germany, Austria or Switzerland were included. RESULTS: A total of 474 studies were found and 25 studies (5.3 %) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In the last 22 years German speaking countries have published approximately one prospective, randomized, clinical trial per year on prehospital emergency medicine. The median number of patients included in the trials was 159 (minimum 16, maximum 1,219). Most (80 %) studies originated from Germany and most (64 %) studies were conducted by anesthesiology departments. Cardiac arrest was the most frequent subject of the investigated studies. Approximately 50 % of the studies had financial support from industrial companies. CONCLUSION: A significant increase or decrease in the number of prospective randomized clinical trials in the out-of-hospital setting could not be found in German speaking countries despite the fact that the absolute numbers of studies had increased. Only about one prospective, randomized clinical trial with an emergency medicine core tracer diagnosis originated from Germany, Austria and Switzerland per year.

[Shock wave therapy for recalcitrant plantar fasciitis with heel spur: a prospective randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study]. / Stosswellentherapie bei therapieresistenter Plantarfasziitis mit Fersensporn: eine prospektiv randomisiert plazebokontrollierte Doppelblindstudie.

AIM: Efficacy of low-energy shock wave therapy for recalcitrant plantar fasciitis. METHOD: 32 patients were randomly assigned into real and placebo ESWT groups, treatment comprised 1000 impulses of 0,08 mJ/mm 2 at 14 kV (OssaTron OSA 120, HMT AG, Switzerland) in 12 cases repeated after six weeks or placebo (energy-absorbing foil). Follow-up evaluation (19, 32 and 48 wks.) included specific questionnaire, clinical-functional examination and measurement of plantar pressure while walking (Emed AT-4. pedograph, Novel GmbH, Munich). Examiner and patients were blinded. RESULTS: 88 % of the treatment group were pain free or had good results. None of the placebo group were pain free, 33.3 % had good results (Roles and Maudsley Score). The treatment group showed significantly better outcome for morning and resting pain, pressure stamp-tolerance and walking ability. Pedography did not show a clear correlation between pain relief and load pattern. CONCLUSION: The results of this study corroborate the value of ESWT for recalcitrant plantar fascitis. As a non invasive technique with low side effects, it can complement the row of conservative treatments.