Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Malar J ; 13: 204, 2014 May 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24885621

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Effective case management of uncomplicated malaria is a fundamental pillar of malaria control. Little is known about the various steps in designing interventions to accompany the roll out of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) and artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT). This study documents the process of designing and implementing interventions to change clinicians' practice in the management of uncomplicated malaria. METHODS: A literature review combined with formative quantitative and qualitative research were carried out to determine patterns of malaria diagnosis and treatment and to understand how malaria and its treatment are enacted by clinicians. These findings were used, alongside a comprehensive review of previous interventions, to identify possible strategies for changing the behaviour of clinicians when diagnosing and treating uncomplicated malaria. These strategies were discussed with ministry of health representatives and other stakeholders. Two intervention packages - a basic and an enhanced training were outlined, together with logic model to show how each was hypothesized to increase testing for malaria, improve adherence to test results and increase appropriate use of ACT. The basic training targeted clinicians' knowledge of malaria diagnosis, rapid diagnostic testing and malaria treatment. The enhanced training included additional modules on adapting to change, professionalism and communicating effectively. Modules were delivered using small-group work, card games, drama and role play. Interventions were piloted, adapted and trainers were trained before final implementation. RESULTS: Ninety-six clinicians from 37 health facilities in Bamenda and Yaounde sites attended either 1-day basic or 3-day enhanced training. The trained clinicians then trained 632 of their peers at their health facilities. Evaluation of the training revealed that 68% of participants receiving the basic and 92% of those receiving the enhanced training strongly agreed that it is not appropriate to prescribe anti-malarials to a patient if they have a negative RDT result. CONCLUSION: Formative research was an important first step, and it was valuable to engage stakeholders early in the process. A logic model and literature reviews were useful to identify key elements and mechanisms for behaviour change intervention. An iterative process with feedback loops allowed appropriate development and implementation of the intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01350752.


Asunto(s)
Terapia Conductista , Educación Médica Continua/métodos , Malaria/diagnóstico , Malaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Camerún , Humanos
2.
Value Health ; 17(8): 783-91, 2014 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25498773

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are a valid alternative to malaria testing with microscopy and are recommended for the testing of febrile patients before prescribing an antimalarial. There is a need for interventions to support the uptake of RDTs by health workers. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of introducing RDTs with basic or enhanced training in health facilities in which microscopy was available, compared with current practice. METHODS: A three-arm cluster randomized trial was conducted in 46 facilities in central and northwest Cameroon. Basic training had a practical session on RDTs and lectures on malaria treatment guidelines. Enhanced training included small-group activities designed to change health workers' practice and reduce the consumption of antimalarials among test-negative patients. The primary outcome was the proportion of febrile patients correctly treated: febrile patients should be tested for malaria, artemisinin combination therapy should be prescribed for confirmed cases, and no antimalarial should be prescribed for patients who are test-negative. Individual patient data were obtained from facility records and an exit survey. Costs were estimated from a societal perspective using project reports and patient exit data. The analysis used bivariate multilevel modeling and adjusted for imbalance in baseline covariates. RESULTS: Incremental cost per febrile patient correctly treated was $8.40 for the basic arm and $3.71 for the enhanced arm. On scale-up, it was estimated that RDTs with enhanced training would save $0.75 per additional febrile patient correctly treated. CONCLUSIONS: Introducing RDTs with enhanced training was more cost-effective than RDTs with basic training when each was compared with current practice.


Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos/administración & dosificación , Artemisininas/administración & dosificación , Personal de Salud/educación , Capacitación en Servicio/organización & administración , Malaria Falciparum/diagnóstico , Malaria Falciparum/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Antimaláricos/economía , Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Artemisininas/economía , Artemisininas/uso terapéutico , Camerún , Niño , Preescolar , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Fiebre/etiología , Instituciones de Salud , Humanos , Lactante , Malaria , Malaria Falciparum/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven
3.
Trop Med Int Health ; 17(3): 330-42, 2012 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22098135

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the quality of malaria case management in Cameroon 5 years after the adoption of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT). Treatment patterns were examined in different types of facility, and the factors associated with being prescribed or receiving an ACT were investigated. METHODS: A cross-sectional cluster survey was conducted among individuals of all ages who left public and private health facilities and medicine retailers in Cameroon and who reported seeking treatment for a fever. Prevalence of malaria was determined by rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) in consenting patients attending the facilities and medicine retailers. RESULTS: Among the patients, 73% were prescribed or received an antimalarial, and 51% were prescribed or received an ACT. Treatment provided to patients significantly differed by type of facility: 65% of patients at public facilities, 55% of patients at private facilities and 45% of patients at medicine retailers were prescribed or received an ACT (P = 0.023). The odds of a febrile patient being prescribed or receiving an ACT were significantly higher for patients who asked for an ACT (OR = 24.1, P < 0.001), were examined by the health worker (OR = 1.88, P = 0.021), had not previously sought an antimalarial for the illness (OR = 2.29, P = 0.001) and sought treatment at a public (OR = 3.55) or private facility (OR = 1.99, P = 0.003). Malaria was confirmed in 29% of patients and 70% of patients with a negative result were prescribed or received an antimalarial. CONCLUSIONS: Malaria case management could be improved. Symptomatic diagnosis is inefficient because two-thirds of febrile patients do not have malaria. Government plans to extend malaria testing should promote rational use of ACT; though, the introduction of rapid diagnostic testing needs to be accompanied by updated clinical guidelines that provide clear guidance for the treatment of patients with negative test results.


Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Artemisininas/uso terapéutico , Fiebre/tratamiento farmacológico , Instituciones de Salud , Malaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Extractos Vegetales/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Camerún/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Comercio , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Fiebre/etiología , Instituciones de Salud/economía , Humanos , Lactante , Malaria/epidemiología , Masculino , Oportunidad Relativa , Farmacias , Examen Físico , Prescripciones , Prevalencia , Sector Privado , Sector Público , Adulto Joven
4.
Malar J ; 10: 250, 2011 Aug 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21867552

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Resistance to anti-malarial drugs is a widespread problem for control programmes for this devastating disease. Molecular tests are available for many anti-malarial drugs and are useful tools for the surveillance of drug resistance. However, the correlation of treatment outcome and molecular tests with particular parasite markers is not perfect, due in part to individuals who are able to clear genotypically drug-resistant parasites. This study aimed to identify molecular markers in the human genome that correlate with the clearance of malaria parasites after drug treatment, despite the drug resistance profile of the protozoan as predicted by molecular approaches. METHODS: 3721 samples from five African countries, which were known to contain genotypically drug resistant parasites, were analysed. These parasites were collected from patients who subsequently failed to clear their infection following drug treatment, as expected, but also from patients who successfully cleared their infections with drug-resistant parasites. 67 human polymorphisms (SNPs) on 17 chromosomes were analysed using Sequenom's mass spectrometry iPLEX gold platform, to identify regions of the human genome, which contribute to enhanced clearance of drug resistant parasites. RESULTS: An analysis of all data from the five countries revealed significant associations between the phenotype of ability to clear drug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum infection and human immune response loci common to all populations. Overall, three SNPs showed a significant association with clearance of drug-resistant parasites with odds ratios of 0.76 for SNP rs2706384 (95% CI 0.71-0.92, P = 0.005), 0.66 for SNP rs1805015 (95% CI 0.45-0.97, P = 0.03), and 0.67 for SNP rs1128127 (95% CI 0.45-0.99, P = 0.05), after adjustment for possible confounding factors. The first two SNPs (rs2706384 and rs1805015) are within loci involved in pro-inflammatory (interferon-gamma) and anti-inflammatory (IL-4) cytokine responses. The third locus encodes a protein involved in the degradation of misfolded proteins within the endoplasmic reticulum, and its role, if any, in the clearance phenotype is unclear. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed significant association of three loci in the human genome with the ability of parasite to clear drug-resistant P. falciparum in samples taken from five countries distributed across sub-Saharan Africa. Both SNP rs2706384 and SNP1805015 have previously been reported to be associated with risk of malaria infection in African populations. The loci are involved in the Th1/Th2 balance, and the association of SNPs within these genes suggests a key role for antibody in the clearance of drug-resistant parasites. It is possible that patients able to clear drug-resistant infections have an enhanced ability to control parasite growth.


Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos/farmacología , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Malaria Falciparum/genética , Malaria Falciparum/inmunología , Plasmodium falciparum/efectos de los fármacos , Plasmodium falciparum/inmunología , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Adolescente , África , Antimaláricos/administración & dosificación , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Genómica/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Espectrometría de Masas/métodos , Plasmodium falciparum/aislamiento & purificación
5.
Pan Afr Med J ; 28: 294, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29854067

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Vaginal candidiasis is considered as an important public health problem worldwide and its incidence has increased nowadays. In recent years, inappropriate and disproportionate use of antifungal drugs, automedication as well as non compliance have caused drug resistance. METHODS: This study aimed at determining the in vitro antifungal susceptibility patterns of Candida speciesisolated from female genital tract at Yaoundé Bethesda Hospital in Cameroon. Two hundred and fourthy five women (age range: 15 years to 49 years) attending the hospital were recruited between January and June 2014 in this cross sectional study. Vaginal smears were collected using sterile swabs from each participant and cultured on sabouraud dextrose agar supplemented with chloramphenico l 0.5%; identification of Candida spp. was performed following standard methods. The disk diffusion method was used for antifungal susceptibility testing. RESULTS: Out of the 245 vaginal smears collected, 94 (38.4%) strains of yeast were isolates among which 43 (45.7%) were Candida albicans and 51 (54.3%) were non albicans. The highest susceptibility of the isolates was seen for nystatin 62 (83.78%), ketoconazole 61 (82.43%) and fluconazole 60 (81.08%). CONCLUSION: Despite the noticeable resistance of Candida spp. isolates to miconazole and itraconazole, the results indicate that nystatin, ketoconazole and fluconazole are the drugs of choice for the therapy of vaginal candidiasis in this region.


Asunto(s)
Antifúngicos/farmacología , Candida/efectos de los fármacos , Candidiasis Vulvovaginal/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Camerún/epidemiología , Candida/aislamiento & purificación , Candidiasis Vulvovaginal/epidemiología , Candidiasis Vulvovaginal/microbiología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Frotis Vaginal , Adulto Joven
6.
Health Syst Reform ; 2(4): 373-388, 2016 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31514719

RESUMEN

Abstract-Rigorous evidence of "what works" to improve health care is in demand, but methods for the development of interventions have not been scrutinized in the same ways as methods for evaluation. This article presents and examines intervention development processes of eight malaria health care interventions in East and West Africa. A case study approach was used to draw out experiences and insights from multidisciplinary teams who undertook to design and evaluate these studies. Four steps appeared necessary for intervention design: (1) definition of scope, with reference to evaluation possibilities; (2) research to inform design, including evidence and theory reviews and empirical formative research; (3) intervention design, including consideration and selection of approaches and development of activities and materials; and (4) refining and finalizing the intervention, incorporating piloting and pretesting. Alongside these steps, projects produced theories, explicitly or implicitly, about (1) intended pathways of change and (2) how their intervention would be implemented.The work required to design interventions that meet and contribute to current standards of evidence should not be underestimated. Furthermore, the process should be recognized not only as technical but as the result of micro and macro social, political, and economic contexts, which should be acknowledged and documented in order to infer generalizability. Reporting of interventions should go beyond descriptions of final intervention components or techniques to encompass the development process. The role that evaluation possibilities play in intervention design should be brought to the fore in debates over health care improvement.

7.
Lancet Glob Health ; 2(6): e346-58, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25103303

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The scale-up of malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) is intended to improve case management of fever and targeting of artemisinin-based combination therapy. Habitual presumptive treatment has hampered these intentions, suggesting a need for strategies to support behaviour change. We aimed to assess the introduction of RDTs when packaged with basic or enhanced clinician training interventions in Cameroon. METHODS: We did a three-arm, stratified, cluster-randomised trial at 46 public and mission health facilities at two study sites in Cameroon to compare three approaches to malaria diagnosis. Facilities were randomly assigned by a computer program in a 9:19:19 ratio to current practice with microscopy (widely available, used as a control group); RDTs with a basic (1 day) clinician training intervention; or RDTs with an enhanced (3 days) clinician training intervention. Patients (or their carers) and fieldworkers who administered surveys to obtain outcome data were masked to study group assignment. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients treated in accordance with WHO malaria treatment guidelines, which is a composite indicator of whether patients were tested for malaria and given appropriate treatment consistent with the test result. All analyses were by intention to treat. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01350752. FINDINGS: The study took place between June 7 and Dec 14, 2011. The analysis included 681 patients from nine facilities in the control group, 1632 patients from 18 facilities in the basic-training group, and 1669 from 19 facilities in the enhanced-training group. The proportion of patients treated in accordance with malaria guidelines did not improve with either intervention; the adjusted risk ratio (RR) for basic training compared with control was 1·04 (95% CI 0·53-2·07; p=0·90), and for enhanced training compared with control was 1·17 (0·61-2·25; p=0·62). Inappropriate use of antimalarial drugs after a negative test was reduced from 84% (201/239) in the control group to 52% (413/796) in the basic-training group (unadjusted RR 0·63, 0·28-1·43; p=0·25) and to 31% (232/759) in the enhanced-training group (0·29, 0·11-0·77; p=0·02). INTERPRETATION: Enhanced clinician training, designed to translate knowledge into prescribing practice and improve quality of care, has the potential to halve overtreatment in public and mission health facilities in Cameroon. Basic training is unlikely to be sufficient to support the behaviour change required for the introduction of RDTs.


Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Atención a la Salud/normas , Educación Médica Continua/métodos , Adhesión a Directriz , Malaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Camerún , Competencia Clínica , Análisis por Conglomerados , Femenino , Fiebre/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
8.
Trials ; 13: 4, 2012 Jan 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22225699

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Governments and donors all over Africa are searching for sustainable, affordable and cost-effective ways to improve the quality of malaria case management. Widespread deficiencies have been reported in the prescribing and counselling practices of health care providers treating febrile patients in both public and private health facilities. Cameroon is no exception with low levels of adherence to national guidelines, the frequent selection of non-recommended antimalarials and the use of incorrect dosages. This study evaluates the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of introducing two different provider training packages, alongside rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs), designed to equip providers with the knowledge and practical skills needed to effectively diagnose and treat febrile patients. The overall aim is to target antimalarial treatment better and to facilitate optimal use of malaria treatment guidelines. METHODS/DESIGN: A 3-arm stratified, cluster randomized trial will be conducted to assess whether introducing RDTs with provider training (basic or enhanced) is more cost-effective than current practice without RDTs, and whether there is a difference in the cost effectiveness of the provider training interventions. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients attending facilities that report a fever or suspected malaria and receive treatment according to malaria guidelines. This will be measured by surveying patients (or caregivers) as they exit public and mission health facilities. Cost-effectiveness will be presented in terms of the primary outcome and a range of secondary outcomes, including changes in provider knowledge. Costs will be estimated from a societal and provider perspective using standard economic evaluation methodologies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00981877.


Asunto(s)
Técnicos Medios en Salud/economía , Técnicos Medios en Salud/educación , Antimaláricos/economía , Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Malaria/etiología , Malaria/terapia , Proyectos de Investigación , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Camerún , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina/economía , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Malaria/diagnóstico , Modelos Económicos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/economía , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Soc Sci Med ; 74(10): 1528-35, 2012 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22430000

RESUMEN

In response to widespread overuse of antimalarial drugs, the World Health Organisation changed guidelines in 2010 to restrict the use of antimalarials to parasitologically confirmed malaria cases. Malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have been presented as a means to realize the new guidelines, and National Malaria Control Programmes, including that of Cameroon, are developing plans to introduce the tests to replace microscopy or clinical diagnosis at public health facilities across the country. We aimed to understand how malaria tests and antimalarial drugs are currently used as part of social interactions between health workers and patients at public and mission health facilities in Yaoundé and Bamenda and surrounding districts in the Northwest region of Cameroon. In May to June 2010, we held 17 focus group discussions with 146 health workers involved in clinical care from 49 health facilities. Clinicians enacted malaria as a 'juggling' exercise, involving attention to pathophysiology of the patient as well as their desires and medical reputations, utilising tests and medicines for their therapeutic effects as symbols in the process of care. Parasites were rarely mentioned in describing diagnostic decisions. These enactments of malaria contrast with evidence-based guidelines emanating from WHO, which assume the parasite is the central driver of practice. If RDTs are to be taken up in practice, public health practitioners need to pay careful attention to the values and priorities of health workers and patients if they are to work with them to improve diagnosis and treatment of febrile illnesses.


Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Malaria Falciparum/diagnóstico , Adulto , Antimaláricos/normas , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Camerún , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico/métodos , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico/normas , Toma de Decisiones , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Guías como Asunto , Humanos , Malaria Falciparum/tratamiento farmacológico , Malaria Falciparum/parasitología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Plasmodium falciparum/aislamiento & purificación , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Organización Mundial de la Salud
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA