Development of an adapted Clinical Global Impression scale for use in Angelman syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) and CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) scales are widely accepted tools that measure overall disease severity and change, synthesizing the clinician's impression of the global state of an individual. Frequently employed in clinical trials for neuropsychiatric disorders, the CGI scales are typically used in conjunction with disease-specific rating scales. When no disease-specific rating scale is available, the CGI scales can be adapted to reflect the specific symptom domains that are relevant to the disorder. Angelman syndrome (AS) is a rare, clinically heterogeneous condition for which there is no disease-specific rating scale. This paper describes efforts to develop standardized, adapted CGI scales specific to AS for use in clinical trials. METHODS: In order to develop adapted CGI scales specific to AS, we (1) reviewed literature and interviewed caregivers and clinicians to determine the most impactful symptoms, (2) engaged expert panels to define and operationalize the symptom domains identified, (3) developed detailed rating anchors for each domain and for global severity and improvement ratings, (4) reviewed the anchors with expert clinicians and established minimally clinically meaningful change for each symptom domain, and (5) generated mock patient vignettes to test the reliability of the resulting scales and to standardize rater training. This systematic approach to developing, validating, and training raters on a standardized, adapted CGI scale specifically for AS is described herein. RESULTS: The resulting CGI-S/I-AS scales capture six critical domains (behavior, gross and fine motor function, expressive and receptive communication, and sleep) defined by caregivers and expert clinicians as the most challenging for patients with AS and their families. CONCLUSIONS: Rigorous training and careful calibration for clinicians will allow the CGI-S/-I-AS scales to be reliable in the context of randomized controlled trials. The CGI-S/-I-AS scales are being utilized in a Phase 3 trial of gaboxadol for the treatment of AS.

Gaboxadol in Fragile X Syndrome: A 12-Week Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Phase 2a Study.

Background: Fragile X syndrome (FXS), the most common single-gene cause of intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder (ASD), is caused by a >200-trinucleotide repeat expansion in the 5' untranslated region of the fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) gene. Individuals with FXS can present with a range of neurobehavioral impairments including, but not limited to: cognitive, language, and adaptive deficits; ASD; anxiety; social withdrawal and avoidance; and aggression. Decreased expression of the γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptor δ subunit and deficient GABAergic tonic inhibition could be associated with symptoms of FXS. Gaboxadol (OV101) is a δ-subunit-selective, extrasynaptic GABAA receptor agonist that enhances GABAergic tonic inhibition, providing the rationale for assessment of OV101 as a potential targeted treatment of FXS. No drug is approved in the United States for the treatment of FXS. Methods: This 12-weeks, randomized (1:1:1), double-blind, parallel-group, phase 2a study was designed to assess the safety, tolerability, efficacy, and optimal daily dose of OV101 5 mg [once (QD), twice (BID), or three-times daily (TID)] when administered for 12 weeks to adolescent and adult men with FXS. Safety was the primary study objective, with key assessments including treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), treatment-related adverse events leading to study discontinuation, and serious adverse events (SAEs). The secondary study objective was to evaluate the effect of OV101 on a variety of problem behaviors. Results: A total of 23 participants with FXS (13 adolescents, 10 adults) with moderate-to-severe neurobehavioral phenotypes (Full Scale Intelligence Quotient, 41.5 ± 3.29; ASD, 82.6%) were randomized to OV101 5 mg QD (n = 8), 5 mg BID (n = 8), or 5 mg TID (n = 7) for 12 weeks. OV101 was well tolerated across all 3 treatment regimens. The most common TEAEs were upper respiratory tract infection (n = 4), headache (n = 3), diarrhea (n = 2), and irritability (n = 2). No SAEs were reported. Improvements from baseline to end-of-treatment were observed on several efficacy endpoints, and 60% of participants were identified as treatment responders based on Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement. Conclusions: Overall, OV101 was safe and well tolerated. Efficacy results demonstrate an initial signal for OV101 in individuals with FXS. These results need to be confirmed in a larger, randomized, placebo-controlled study with optimal outcomes and in the most appropriate age group. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03697161.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Risperidone Subcutaneous Implants in Stable Patients With Schizophrenia.

A subcutaneous risperidone implant (RI) formulation was developed to improve medication adherence in schizophrenia. Two phase 1 studies were conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of RI in adult patients with schizophrenia. In study 1, all subjects were stable on 4 mg oral risperidone; subsequently, the first subject received 375 mg RI for 1 month, and the remaining subjects received 375 mg RI for 3 months. In study 2, all subjects were stable on oral risperidone 4 mg, 6 mg, or 8 mg and subsequently received RI 480 mg, 720 mg, or 960 mg, respectively, for 6 months. Blood samples were collected at prespecified time points. Various pharmacokinetic parameters were determined in both studies. In both studies risperidone total active moiety plasma concentrations following RI increased slowly, reached therapeutic levels within approximately 2 days, and remained relatively stable. In study 1, the average concentration for RI was 81.3% of the oral trough concentration and 27.5% of the oral peak concentration. In study 2, the steady-state concentration for RI was comparable to the oral trough concentration of the corresponding dose. Patient disease status remained stable with no major safety issues. RI may represent an alternative formulation for schizophrenia treatment with a lower peak-to-trough plasma drug ratio than oral risperidone.

Intravenous zoledronic acid 5 mg in the treatment of postmenopausal women with low bone density previously treated with alendronate.

This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter trial assessed safety and efficacy of a single dose of IV zoledronic acid (ZOL) 5 mg vs. oral alendronate (ALN) 70 mg weekly in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density (BMD) who had previously been treated with ALN. Postmenopausal women who were receiving oral ALN for at least 1 year immediately prior to randomization and with lumbar spine or femoral neck BMD T-score values < or = -2.0 prior to initiation of ALN were randomized to one 15-min IV infusion of ZOL 5 mg plus 52 weeks of oral placebo (n=113) or one IV infusion of placebo plus 52 weeks of oral ALN 70 mg (n=112). End points included percent change in lumbar spine BMD from baseline to month 12 and relative change from baseline in urine N-telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX), serum C-telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX), amino terminal propeptides of type I collagen (PINP), and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (bone ALP) over 12 months. Adverse events, bone histomorphometry and microscopic appearance, and patient preference for the 2 treatment regimens were also assessed. In this study, a single infusion of ZOL 5 mg maintained BMD 12 months following the switch from oral ALN in women with osteoporosis. The mean duration of prior ALN therapy at baseline was 4 years. Mean biomarker levels in the ALN 70-mg group remained at or close to baseline levels for the duration of the study. In the ZOL 5-mg group, mean biomarker levels were reduced from baseline after 3 months, returned to baseline after 6 months, and increased thereafter but remained within the premenopausal range. The overall rates of adverse events were comparable in the 2 groups (ZOL 5 mg, 86.7%; ALN 70 mg, 80.4%). Headache occurred more commonly within the first 3 days after infusion with ZOL 5 mg (12.4%) than with ALN 70 mg (6.3%). Bone biopsies indicate that both treatments decrease excessive remodeling seen in osteoporosis. The majority (78.7%) of patients expressed preference for once yearly infusion over weekly oral therapy. We conclude that patients can be switched from oral ALN to ZOL 5 mg infusion with maintenance of therapeutic effect for at least 12 months and that patients prefer a once yearly infusion to weekly oral therapy.

Oral Migalastat HCl Leads to Greater Systemic Exposure and Tissue Levels of Active α-Galactosidase A in Fabry Patients when Co-Administered with Infused Agalsidase.

UNLABELLED: Migalastat HCl (AT1001, 1-Deoxygalactonojirimycin) is an investigational pharmacological chaperone for the treatment of α-galactosidase A (α-Gal A) deficiency, which leads to Fabry disease, an X-linked, lysosomal storage disorder. The currently approved, biologics-based therapy for Fabry disease is enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) with either agalsidase alfa (Replagal) or agalsidase beta (Fabrazyme). Based on preclinical data, migalastat HCl in combination with agalsidase is expected to result in the pharmacokinetic (PK) enhancement of agalsidase in plasma by increasing the systemic exposure of active agalsidase, thereby leading to increased cellular levels in disease-relevant tissues. This Phase 2a study design consisted of an open-label, fixed-treatment sequence that evaluated the effects of single oral doses of 150 mg or 450 mg migalastat HCl on the PK and tissue levels of intravenously infused agalsidase (0.2, 0.5, or 1.0 mg/kg) in male Fabry patients. As expected, intravenous administration of agalsidase alone resulted in increased α-Gal A activity in plasma, skin, and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) compared to baseline. Following co-administration of migalastat HCl and agalsidase, α-Gal A activity in plasma was further significantly increased 1.2- to 5.1-fold compared to agalsidase administration alone, in 22 of 23 patients (95.6%). Importantly, similar increases in skin and PBMC α-Gal A activity were seen following co-administration of migalastat HCl and agalsidase. The effects were not related to the administered migalastat HCl dose, as the 150 mg dose of migalastat HCl increased α-Gal A activity to the same extent as the 450 mg dose. Conversely, agalsidase had no effect on the plasma PK of migalastat. No migalastat HCl-related adverse events or drug-related tolerability issues were identified. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01196871.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Migalastat HCl and Effects on Agalsidase Activity in Healthy Volunteers.

Migalastat HCl is an investigational, oral treatment for Fabry disease, an X-linked lysosomal storage disorder. Four Phase 1 studies were conducted to determine the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and tolerability of migalastat. Healthy volunteers (N = 124), 18-55 years old, received migalastat HCl single (25 mg-2000 mg) or twice-daily doses (50 mg, 150 mg) for 7 days in a double-blind, placebo-controlled fashion. Migalastat pharmacokinetics were dose-proportional (AUC∞ range: 1129-72 838 ng h/mL, Cmax range: 200.5-13 844 ng/mL, t1/2 3-4 hours). Steady state was achieved by Day 7. Up to 67% of the dose was excreted as unchanged drug in urine. Increased α-Gal A activity was dose related. No abnormal cardiac effects, including prolonged QTc intervals, were observed. The pharmacokinetics of migalastat were well characterized in these Phase 1 studies conducted healthy volunteers. The 150 mg dose of migalastat HCl administered BID for 7 days was generally safe and well tolerated. A TQT study demonstrated lack of a positive signal at therapeutic and supra-therapeutic doses. Increases in α-Gal A enzyme activity for the 150 mg dose observed in healthy subjects suggested a successful proof of mechanism for further investigations.