RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite the unprecedented surge in the incidence of mucormycosis in the COVID-19 era, the antifungal susceptibility patterns (ASPs) of COVID-19 associated mucormycosis (CAM) isolates have not been investigated so far and it is unclear if the high mortality rate associated with CAM is driven by decreased susceptibility of Mucorales to antifungal drugs. OBJECTIVES: To describe the clinical, mycological, outcome and in vitro ASPs of CAM cases and their etiologies from Iran. PATIENTS/METHODS: A prospective study from January 2020 to January 2022 at a referral tertiary hospital in Tehran, Iran was conducted for screening mucormycosis through histopathology and mycological methods. The identity of Mucorales isolates was revealed with ITS-panfungal PCR& sequencing and MALDI-TOF. The AS for amphotericin B, itraconazole, isavuconazole and posaconazole was cleared according to the EUCAST antifungal susceptibility testing protocol. RESULT: A total of 150 individuals were diagnosed with CAM. Males constituted 60.7% of the population. The mean age was 54.9 years. Diabetes was the leading risk factor (74.7%). The median interval between diagnosis of COVID-19 and CAM was 31 days. The recovery rate of culture was as low as 41.3% with Rhizopus arrhizus being identified as the dominant (60; 96.7%) agent. Amphotericin B (MIC50 = 0.5 µg/ml) demonstrated the highest potency against Mucorales. CONCLUSION: Majority of the cases had either diabetes, history of corticosteroid therapy or simultaneously both conditions. Accordingly, close monitoring of blood glucose should be considered. The indications for corticosteroids therapy are recommended to be optimized. Also, an anti Mucorales prophylaxis may be necessitated to be administrated in high risk individuals. Although amphotericin B was the most active agent, a higher rate of resistance to this antifungal was noted here in comparison with earlier studies on mucormycetes from non-CAM cases.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus , Mucorales , Mucormicosis , Masculino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mucormicosis/diagnóstico , Mucormicosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Mucormicosis/epidemiología , Antifúngicos/farmacología , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Anfotericina B/farmacología , Anfotericina B/uso terapéutico , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Irán/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) are among the most common nosocomial infections with different clinical and microbiological characteristics. We studied these characteristics in critically ill patients. METHODOLOGY: This research was a cross-sectional study conducted on intensive care unit (ICU) patients with CAUTI. Patients' demographic and clinical information and laboratory data, including causative microorganisms and antibiotic susceptibility tests, were recorded and analyzed. Finally, the differences between the patients who survived and died were compared. RESULTS: After reviewing 353 ICU cases, 80 patients with CAUTI were finally included in the study. The mean age was 55.9 ± 19.1 years, 43.7% were male and 56.3% were female. The mean length of infection development since hospitalisation and hospital stay were 14.7 (3-90) and 27.8 (5-98) days, respectively. The most common symptom was fever (80%). The microbiological identification showed that the most isolated microorganisms were Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Enterobacteriaceae (75%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (8.8%), Gram-positive uropathogens (8.8%) and Acinetobacter baumannii (5%). Fifteen patients (18.8%) died among whom infections with A. baumannii (75%) and P. aeruginosa (57.1%) were associated with more death (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Although A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa can be the most important pathogens for death, MDR Enterobacteriaceae are still a serious concern as causes of CAUTIs.
Asunto(s)
Acinetobacter baumannii , Infección Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Irán/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Enfermedad Crítica , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Catéteres , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana MúltipleRESUMEN
Background & Objective: Antibiotic resistance, especially in the form of multidrug-resistant (MDR), is a big problem, especially in intensive care units (ICUs). This study aimed to evaluate antibiotic resistance and MDR patterns among patients hospitalized in the ICUs in one of the large referral centers in Iran. Methods: The present study was conducted at Imam Khomeini Hospital in Tehran (a great referral hospital), which admits critically ill patients requiring ICU services. To determine the rate of positive cultures for resistant strains, the patient's blood specimens were sent to the laboratory of the hospital for inoculation on proper culture media within 2 hours of extraction. Antimicrobial susceptibility tests were done using the Bauer-Kirby disk diffusion method. Results: A total of 1,755 samples were collected from the patients to assess microbial strains and antibiotic resistance. The most common microbial strains detected in the cultures extracted from peripheral blood samples were Klebsiella pneumonia (22.1%), Staphylococcus epidermidis (7.9%) and another coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (15.0%). The antibiogram test showed antibiotic resistance in 1,509 cases, leading to a resistance prevalence rate of 85.9%. The most common antimicrobial resistance observed was against cotrimoxazole (61.7%), ciprofloxacin (51.3%), imipenem (50.0%), and ampicillin (49.6%). The rate of MDR was found to be 96.3%. Conclusion: In Iran's ICUs, a significantly high level of antibiotic resistance may be seen especially the MDR pattern, which indicates the need to change the pattern of prescribing and managing these drugs in ICU centers.
RESUMEN
Background and Purpose: The pandemic of COVID-19 has caused a worldwide health crisis. Candidemia is a potentially lethal condition that has not yet been enough discussed in patients with COVID-19. The current study aimed to investigate the prevalence of candidemia among Iranian COVID-19 patients and characterize its causative agents and the antifungal susceptibility pattern. Materials and Methods: The present cross-sectional survey was carried out from March 2020 to March 2021 at Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran, Iran. Blood specimens were obtained from patients with confirmed coronavirus infection who also had criteria for candidemia and were examined for any Candida species by conventional and molecular techniques. Susceptibility of isolates to amphotericin B, voriconazole, itraconazole, fluconazole, caspofungin, and 5-flucytosine was tested using the CLSI broth dilution technique. Results: In total, 153 patients with COVID-19 were included and candidemia was confirmed in 12 (7.8 %) of them. The majority of patients were ≥ 50 years of age (n=9) and female (n=8). Moreover, 6 out of the 12 patients were diabetic. The presence of central venous catheters, broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy, ICU admission, and mechanical ventilation was observed in all patients. The C. albicans (n=7, 58.3 %) and C. dubliniensis (n=2, 16.7%) were the most common isolated species. Amphotericin B and 5-flucytosine were the most active drugs. Despite antifungal treatment, 4 out of 12 patients (33.3 %) died. Conclusion: Due to the high mortality, the early diagnosis and proper treatment of candidemia are essential requirements for optimal clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients.