Peritoneal catheters in neonates undergoing complex cardiac surgery: a multi-centre descriptive study.

BACKGROUND: The use of peritoneal catheters for prophylactic dialysis or drainage to prevent fluid overload after neonatal cardiac surgery is common in some centres; however, the multi-centre variability and details of peritoneal catheter use are not well described. METHODS: Twenty-two-centre NEonatal and Pediatric Heart Renal Outcomes Network (NEPHRON) study to describe multi-centre peritoneal catheter use after STAT category 3-5 neonatal cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass. Patient characteristics and acute kidney injury/fluid outcomes for six post-operative days are described among three cohorts: peritoneal catheter with dialysis, peritoneal catheter with passive drainage, and no peritoneal catheter. RESULTS: Of 1490 neonates, 471 (32%) had an intraoperative peritoneal catheter placed; 177 (12%) received prophylactic dialysis and 294 (20%) received passive drainage. Sixteen (73%) centres used peritoneal catheter at some frequency, including six centres in >50% of neonates. Four centres utilised prophylactic peritoneal dialysis. Time to post-operative dialysis initiation was 3 hours [1, 5] with the duration of 56 hours [37, 90]; passive drainage cohort drained for 92 hours [64, 163]. Peritoneal catheter were more common among patients receiving pre-operative mechanical ventilation, single ventricle physiology, and higher complexity surgery. There was no association with adverse events. Serum creatinine and daily fluid balance were not clinically different on any post-operative day. Mortality was similar. CONCLUSIONS: In neonates undergoing complex cardiac surgery, peritoneal catheter use is not rare, with substantial variability among centres. Peritoneal catheters are used more commonly with higher surgical complexity. Adverse event rates, including mortality, are not different with peritoneal catheter use. Fluid overload and creatinine-based acute kidney injury rates are not different in peritoneal catheter cohorts.

Paediatric cardiac rapid response systems: a survey of multicentre practices.

INTRODUCTION: While the efficacy and guidelines for implementation of rapid response systems are well established, limited information exists about rapid response paradigms for paediatric cardiac patients despite their unique pathophysiology. METHODS: With endorsement from the Paediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Society, we designed and implemented a web-based survey of paediatric cardiac and multidisciplinary ICU medical directors in the United States of America and Canada to better understand paediatric cardiac rapid response practices. RESULTS: Sixty-five (52%) of 125 centres responded. Seventy-one per cent of centres had ∼300 non-ICU beds and 71% had dedicated cardiac ICUs. To respond to cardiac patients, dedicated cardiac rapid response teams were utilised in 29% of all centres (39% and 5% in centres with and without dedicated cardiac ICUs, respectively) [p = 0.006]. Early warning scores were utilised in 62% of centres. Only 31% reported that rapid response teams received specialised training. Transfers to ICU were higher for cardiac (73%) compared to generalised rapid response events (54%). The monitoring and reassessment of patients not transferred to ICU after the rapid response was variable. Cardiac and respiratory arrests outside the ICU were infrequent. Only 29% of centres formally appraise critical deterioration events (need for ventilation and/or inotropes post-rapid response) and 34% perform post-event debriefs. CONCLUSION: Paediatric cardiac rapid response practices are variable and dedicated paediatric cardiac rapid response systems are infrequent in the United States of America and Canada. Opportunity exists to delineate best practices for paediatric cardiac rapid response and standardise practices for activation, training, patient monitoring post-rapid response events, and outcomes evaluation.

An evaluation of the outcomes associated with peritoneal catheter use in neonates undergoing cardiac surgery: A multicenter study.

Objective: The study objective was to determine if intraoperative peritoneal catheter placement is associated with improved outcomes in neonates undergoing high-risk cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Methods: This propensity score-matched retrospective study used data from 22 academic pediatric cardiac intensive care units. Consecutive neonates undergoing Society of Thoracic Surgeons-European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery category 3 to 5 cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass at centers participating in the NEonatal and Pediatric Heart Renal Outcomes Network collaborative were studied to determine the association of the use of an intraoperative placed peritoneal catheter for dialysis or passive drainage with clinical outcomes, including the duration of mechanical ventilation. Results: Among 1490 eligible neonates in the NEonatal and Pediatric Heart Renal Outcomes Network dataset, a propensity-matched analysis was used to compare 395 patients with peritoneal catheter placement with 628 patients without peritoneal catheter placement. Time to extubation and most clinical outcomes were similar. Postoperative length of stay was 5 days longer in the peritoneal catheter placement cohort (17 vs 22 days, P = .001). There was a 50% higher incidence of moderate to severe acute kidney injury in the no-peritoneal catheter cohort (12% vs 18%, P = .02). Subgroup analyses between specific treatments and in highest risk patients yielded similar associations. Conclusions: This study does not demonstrate improved outcomes among neonates with placement of a peritoneal catheter during cardiac surgery. Outcomes were similar apart from longer hospital stay in the peritoneal catheter cohort. The no-peritoneal catheter cohort had a 50% higher incidence of moderate to severe acute kidney injury (12% vs 18%). This analysis does not support indiscriminate peritoneal catheter use, although it may support the utility for postoperative fluid removal among neonates at risk for acute kidney injury. A multicenter controlled trial may better elucidate peritoneal catheter effects.

Cumulative comorbid conditions influence mortality risk after staged palliation for hypoplastic left heart syndrome and variants.

OBJECTIVE: Prematurity, low birth weight, genetic syndromes, extracardiac conditions, and secondary cardiac lesions are considered high-risk conditions associated with mortality after stage 1 palliation. We report the impact of these conditions on outcomes from a prospective multicenter improvement collaborative. METHODS: The National Pediatric Cardiology Quality Improvement Collaborative Phase II registry was queried. Comorbid conditions were categorized and quantified to determine the cumulative burden of high-risk diagnoses on survival to the first birthday. Logistic regression was applied to evaluate factors associated with mortality. RESULTS: Of the 1421 participants, 40% (575) had at least 1 high-risk condition. The aggregate high-risk group had lower survival to the first birthday compared with standard risk (76.2% vs 88.1%, P < .001). Presence of a single high-risk diagnosis was not associated with reduced survival to the first birthday (odds ratio, 0.71; confidence interval, 0.49-1.02, P = .066). Incremental increases in high-risk diagnoses were associated with reduced survival to first birthday (odds ratio, 0.23; confidence interval, 0.15-0.36, P < .001) for 2 and 0.17 (confidence interval, 0.10-0.30, P < .001) for 3 to 5 high-risk diagnoses. Additional analysis that included prestage 1 palliation characteristics and stage 1 palliation perioperative variables identified multiple high-risk diagnoses, poststage 1 palliation extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support (odds ratio, 0.14; confidence interval, 0.10-0.22, P < .001), and cardiac reoperation (odds ratio, 0.66; confidence interval, 0.45-0.98, P = .037) to be associated with reduced survival odds to the first birthday. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of 1 high-risk diagnostic category was not associated with decreased survival at 1 year. Cumulative diagnoses across multiple high-risk diagnostic categories were associated with decreased odds of survival. Further patient accrual is needed to evaluate the impact of specific comorbid conditions within the broader high-risk categories.

Post-traumatic stress disorder in an emergency department population one year after Hurricane Katrina.

BACKGROUND: Hurricane Katrina resulted in a significant amount of injury, death, and destruction. STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of, and risk factors for, symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in an emergency department (ED) population, 1 year after hurricane Katrina. METHODS: Survey data including the Primary Care PTSD (PC-PTSD) screening instrument, demographic data, and questions regarding health care needs and personal loss were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Seven hundred forty-seven subjects completed the survey. The PC-PTSD screen was positive in 38%. In the single variate analysis, there was a correlation with a positive PC-PTSD screen and the following: staying in New Orleans during the storm (odds ratio [OR] 1.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-2.34), having material losses (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.03-2.60), experiencing the death of a loved one (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.35-1.87), needing health care during the storm (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.48-2.73), and not having health care needs met during the storm (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.26-3.18) or after returning to New Orleans (OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.40-3.73). In the multivariate analysis, the death of a loved one (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.26-2.78), being in New Orleans during the storm (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.22-2.33), and seeking health care during the storm (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.22-2.35) were associated with positive PC-PTSD screens. CONCLUSIONS: There was a high prevalence of PTSD in this ED population surveyed 1 year after hurricane Katrina. By targeting high-risk patients, disaster relief teams may be able to reduce the impact of PTSD in similar populations.

Association of Social Determinants of Health With Rapid Response Events: A Retrospective Cohort Trial in a Large Pediatric Academic Hospital System.

Background: Social determinants of health (SDH) are known to impact hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) outcomes. Little is known about the association between SDH and pediatric rapid response (RR) events and understanding this impact will help guide future interventions aimed to eliminate health disparities in the inpatient setting. Objectives: The primary objective of this study is to describe the association between SDH and RR utilization (number of RR events, time to RR event, shift of event and caller). The secondary objective is to determine if SDH can predict hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU transfer, critical deterioration (CD), and mortality. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted. We reviewed all RR events from 2016 to 2019 at a large, academic, pediatric hospital system including a level 1 trauma center and two satellite community campuses. All hospitalized patients up to age 25 who had a RR event during their index hospitalization were included. Exposure variables included age, gender, race/ethnicity, language, income, insurance status, chronic disease status, and repeat RR event. The primary outcome variables were hospital LOS, ICU transfer, CD, and mortality. The odds of mortality, CD events and ICU transfer were assessed using unadjusted and multivariable logistic regression. Associations with hospital LOS were assessed with unadjusted and multivariable quantile regression. Results: Four thousand five hundred and sixty-eight RR events occurred from 3,690 unique admissions and 3301 unique patients, and the cohort was reduced to the index admission. The cohort was largely representative of the population served by the hospital system and varied according to race and ethnicity. There was no variation by race/ethnicity in the number of RR events or the shift in which RR events occurred. Attending physicians initiated RR calls more for event for non-Hispanic patients of mixed or other race (31.6% of events), and fellows and residents were more likely to be the callers for Hispanic patients (29.7% of events, p = 0.002). Families who are non-English speaking are also less likely to activate the RR system (12% of total RR events, p = 0.048). LOS was longest for patients speaking languages other than Spanish or English and CD was more common in patients with government insurance. In adjusted logistic regression, Hispanic patients had 2.5 times the odds of mortality (95% CI: 1.43-4.53, p = 0.002) compared with non-Hispanic white patients. Conclusion: Disparities exist in access to and within the inpatient management of pediatric patients. Our results suggest that interventions to address disparities should focus on Hispanic patients and non-English speaking patients to improve inpatient health equity. More research is needed to understand and address the mortality outcomes in Hispanic children compared to other groups.

Redefining the Relationship: Palliative Care in Critical Perinatal and Neonatal Cardiac Patients.

Patients with perinatal and neonatal congenital heart disease (CHD) represent a unique population with higher morbidity and mortality compared to other neonatal patient groups. Despite an overall improvement in long-term survival, they often require chronic care of complex medical illnesses after hospital discharge, placing a high burden of responsibility on their families. Emerging literature reflects high levels of depression and anxiety which plague parents, starting as early as the time of prenatal diagnosis. In the current era of the global COVID-19 pandemic, the additive nature of significant stressors for both medical providers and families can have catastrophic consequences on communication and coping. Due to the high prognostic uncertainty of CHD, data suggests that early pediatric palliative care (PC) consultation may improve shared decision-making, communication, and coping, while minimizing unnecessary medical interventions. However, barriers to pediatric PC persist largely due to the perception that PC consultation is indicative of "giving up." This review serves to highlight the evolving landscape of perinatal and neonatal CHD and the need for earlier and longitudinal integration of pediatric PC in order to provide high-quality, interdisciplinary care to patients and families.

Pediatric Palliative Care in the Heart Failure, Ventricular Assist Device and Transplant Populations: Supporting Patients, Families and Their Clinical Teams.

Heart failure is a life-changing diagnosis for a child and their family. Pediatric patients with heart failure experience significant morbidity and frequent hospitalizations, and many require advanced therapies such as mechanical circulatory support and/or heart transplantation. Pediatric palliative care is an integral resource for the care of patients with heart failure along its continuum. This includes support during the grief of a new diagnosis in a child critically ill with decompensated heart failure, discussion of goals of care and the complexities of mechanical circulatory support, the pensive wait for heart transplantation, and symptom management and psychosocial support throughout the journey. In this article, we discuss the scope of pediatric palliative care in the realm of pediatric heart failure, ventricular assist device (VAD) support, and heart transplantation. We review the limited, albeit growing, literature in this field, with an added focus on difficult conversation and decision support surrounding re-transplantation, HF in young adults with congenital heart disease, the possibility of destination therapy VAD, and the grimmest decision of VAD de-activation.